Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Summer Meeting 11 9104-1 Preparing for...

Company Confidential

Registration Management Committee (RMC) Summer Meeting

11

9104-1Preparing for the Second Ballot

Atlanta, GAJuly 20, 2010

Michael C Roberts9104/1 Team Lead

Boeing

RMC Summer MeetingAtlanta, GA

July 20-21, 2010


Atlanta, GAJuly 20-21, 2010 2

Agenda / Contents

•Task & History

•Team Activities

•Team Recommendations

•Other Significant Changes

•What Does This Mean To RMC Members

•Latest Schedule

•Q & A



9104/1 Rewrite Team

Roll Name Sector Representing Company

Team Leader Mike Roberts AAQG OPMT Boeing

Team Sponsor Rick Downs AAQG OPMT Chair Cessna

Team Member Tim Lee AAQG OPMT Boeing

Team Member Vince May AAQG OPMT Honeywell

Team Member Rich Vinton AAQG RMC / AAQG Raytheon

Team Member Mike Gallagher AAQG OPMT Lockheed

Team Member Patrice Bleau AAQG RMC Bombardier

Team Member Reg Blake AAQG CBs IAAR

Team Member Lori Scheid-Gillespie AAQG ABs ANAB

Team Member Gualtiero Arsento EAQG OPMT Alenia

Team Member Herbert Mairose EAQG OPMT Airbus

Team Member Ian Folland EAQG ABs UKAS

Team Member Hans Luuijt EAQG OASIS ASD

Team Member Giuseppe Leoni EAQG OPMT Agusta Westand

Team Member Tamaki Nishio APAQG OPMT IHI

Team Member Akihiro Iguro APAQG MHI

Team Member Shuji Komori APAQG JRMC FHI

SAE Editor Jeff Wood AAQG SAE SAE



Original Task Requirements

•Complete the Trilogy of 9104-series documents, by revising 9104A

•Remove sections made redundant by the release of 9104/2 (Oversight) and 9104/3 (Auditor Training and Qualification)

•Address the areas of ICOP concern, by enhancing/revising topics identified in the OPMT FMEA (eg. audit days, multi-site, etc.)

•Upgrade to the new ISO and IAF audit docs.



History

•Project initiated in Melbourne AUS in Apr. ’07

•Team activity at each Spring and Fall IAQG OPMT meeting

•Full week face-to-face in Long Beach, Jun. ’08

•Several focus meetings due to controversial topics (eg. audit day table, multi-site, ASRP)

•Formal Preliminary Review 8/09 to 11/09

•Formal Ballot initiated 1/10



History CONTINUED

• Ballot failed in the Americas (3/10) due to controversy over definition of ‘site’

• Ballot failed in Asia (3/10) due to mandatory audit days and a variety of individual concerns.

• Ballot stopped in Europe (4/10) due to majority voting ‘disapprove’ due to mandatory (no reductions) requirements of audit day table

• Discovered that Europe and Asia have not been following IAF audit day requirements. They fear the consequences and costs of requiring suppliers to meet the new “increased day” requirements.

• In total, over 60 pages (over 350 comments) were collected related to the ballot process.



History CONTINUED

• At the Wash DC IAQG meeting, the OPMT reached an impasse; it was unable to achieve consensus as to what direction would be given to the 9104/1 team to solve the ballot failure issues.

• The OPMT Sector Leads brought the issue to the SWG for guidance and direction. Some on SWT questioned whether ISO 9001-basis and ISO/IAF compliance was necessary.

• The SWG ordered that a special, ‘non-advocate’ team be commissioned to review the issues, identify and resolve conflicts, and define new requirements that, as a minimum, meet the ISO 17xxx and IAF-MD standards.

• The team was given a June 23rd deadline to complete.



History CONTINUED

The Special Non-Advocate Review TeamFacilitators:

• Ian Folland & Tim Lee

Team Members:

• Roger Bennett - International Independent Organization for Certification (IIOC) – IAF MD 1 Convener and IAF MD 5 Co-convener

• Reg Blake - Certification Body (CB) representing the Independent Association of Accredited Registrars (IAAR)

• Norbert Borzek - German AB - DAkkS – Chair of the IAF Technical Committee .

• Patrick Boucheron – Turbomeca, France, OPMT Voting Member

• Buddy Cressionnie - IAQG 9100 International Document Representative (IDR)

• Randy Dougherty – USA AB - ANAB Director – Chair of the IAF

• Michel Jacquaniello – Zodiac Aerospace, France

• Kunihiro Tanabe - Japanese AB - JAB

• Norikazu Tsuchiya – KHI, Japan, OPMT Voting Member



Team Recommendations

•The special team recommended retaining the previously developed (first ballot) audit day table [Table 2] and multiple site requirements table [Table 6].

•The team developed new definitions and criteria for ‘sites’.

•The team created a detailed 17 page “Recommendations” document and “9104/1 Certification Matrix”



Sites – New Organizational Structures

•Single Site

•Multiple Site

•Campus

•Several Sites

•Complex Sites

These take into

consideration the unique

organizational structures

that exist in the Aviation,

Space, and Defense

industry today.

•Tim Lee will present a detailed description for each of these new site structure definitions.



Other Significant Changes Unchanged From Previous Ballot Failure

• Defines AQMS and ICOP

• Updates with the new ISO-17xxx-series and IAF MD-x –series requirements standards

• Sets surveillance requirements (# files, # assessments)

• Sets CB requirements (OASIS data responsibility, administrator, resolution process, suspension and withdrawal requirements, ASRP and CAAT rules, export and confidentiality rules)

• Sets auditing rules (team lead must be AEA and on-site, site-limited to two certification cycles, 8 hour audit day)

• Sampling of sites limited to 9120 and in same country



Other Significant Changes CONTINUED

• Rules for certificate issuance and transfers, loss of certification, scope changes

• Rules for adding and auditing multiple AQMS standards

• Introduces Auditor Authentication Bodies (AABs) and Training Provider Approval Bodies (TPABs)

• Rules for OASIS responsibility and administration

• Authority of OPMT and SMS structures

• Requirements for OASIS Feedback Process

• Rules for organization access, loss notification, T1 data

• Rules for confidentiality and conflict of interest



What Does This Mean To The RMC

• We have been waiting 4 years to complete the Trilogy.

• We had to compensate by preparing alternate plans for the implementation of 9100C and 9101D.

• Due to the new ‘site’ structures for organizations, new audit planning will be required for each certified organization.

• There is a higher level of expectation of auditor competency.

• While 9100 focuses on process, 9104/1 adds focus to the ‘central function’ processes.

• OASIS changes will be required.



Latest Schedule20-Aug-10 Complete Draft Revision (30 days) [ 28 ]

30-Aug-10 Complete IAQG Editor Review (10 Days) [ 38 ]

7-Sep-10 Complete 9104/1 Team Review (1 Week) [ 45 ]

13-Sep-10 Complete Sector LT Review - Obtain Go-Forward Approval (2 weeks) [ 51 ]

13-Sep-10 Begin Ballot [ 51 ]

13-Oct-10 Ballot Complete in Americas (1 month) [ 81 ]

13-Nov-10 Ballot Complete in Asia-Pacific (2 months) [ 111 ]

13-Jan-11 Ballot Complete in Europe (4 months) [ 171 ]

1-Feb-11 Complete Review of Comments (2 weeks) [ 189 ]

1-Mar-11 Complete Review by Sector Standards Councils (30 days) [ 219 ]

15-Mar-11 Publish (English Version) (2 weeks) [ 233 ]



Questions ?

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Summer Meeting 11 9104-1 Preparing for...

Documents

Transcript of Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Summer Meeting 11 9104-1 Preparing for...