Company Confidential 8/18/2015 Performance stream status EAQG performance benchmark York General...
-
Upload
donna-walsh -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Company Confidential 8/18/2015 Performance stream status EAQG performance benchmark York General...
Company Confidential
04/19/23
Performance stream statusEAQG performance benchmark
York General Assembly
Alain Bonnard Christian BuckOctober 22nd 2010
• Product and Services Quality and Delivery will have improved 20% per year throughout the product lifecycle
• Robust processes achieved throughout the Supply Chain (SCMH supplier maturity assesment level 3 or better)
• IAQG Quality management system certification program robust, recognised and valued
• 90% of the industry supply chain certified to IAQG Quality Management System Standards
Performance stream supports IAQG 5 years vision development
Aerospace and Defense Performance Index
• A process consolidating, reporting and publishing the measurement of the whole aerospace and defense supply chain progresses toward the 20% improvement goal
• Based on observed and sampled On Time Deliveries – On Quality Deliveries
• Measurements based on standard “metrics definitions”
• A process allowing each supplier to find its position within the index and to set improvement objectives by itself or in the frame of a customer-supplier relationship
Performance Index Process Loop
Suppliers & customers set improvement
goals
Each supplier is able to find its position in
the index
Suppliers OTD OQD
IAQG members select a
representative sample of
suppliers data
IAQG members provide data to
Performance Agency
(suppliers anonymous)
IAQG members observe their
suppliers performances
IAQG publishes data (e.g. next
slide)
IAQG Council review to 20% improvement
goal
Performance Agency
consolidates data (members
anonymous)
4
5
Average
Excellent
Weak
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
ppm
http://w w w .icare-gie.com
On Quality Performances2007/2008 Evolution
2007
2007
2008
2008
Improvement
Deterioration
2007: 443 ppm 2008: 392 ppm
Item Escape Rates Distribution Sample of 138 suppliers
2007: 4000 ppm 2008: 3500 ppm
2007: 10 ppm 2008: 5 ppm
Performance Index Possible Publication
EAQGSupply Chain
Benchmarking
Benchmarking
Alain BONNARDEAQG Operations Manager
IAQG General AssemblyYork, UK, October 22nd, 2010
Benchmarking ProjectBenchmarking Project
EAQG Initiative launched within the IAQG European Sector
• Project concept defined in 2009• Decision to proceed taken in September 2009• Considered as a Pilot Case• Participation from EAQG Company Members
based on a voluntary basis• Data collection started in January 2010
EAQG Benchmarking Project
7
Goal:Get EAQG Supply Chain 2010 Performance level
Benchmarking PrinciplesBenchmarking Principles
• 2 Performance Metrics
» Conformity (Item Escape rate in PPM)
» Punctuality (On time Delivery in %)
• Suppliers Performance only
» Average of EAQG Suppliers Performance for each Business Unit (if any, optional*) identified by EAQG participating companies (2 data / Per Business Unit)
» Average of EAQG Suppliers Performance for each Technological Segment (Optional*) of each Business Unit (2 data / Per Business Unit / Per Technological Segments)
1. Benchmarking Principles
(Optional*) : To be decided by EAQG participating Companies
8
Benchmarking PrinciplesBenchmarking Principles
• General results
(All Technological Segments together = Average ofSuppliers Performance for each Business Unit identified by EAQG Companies)– Graph / metric
» Conformity (Item Escape rate in PPM)» Punctuality (On time Delivery in %)
– Graph / metric per Technological Segment
(for EAQG participating companies willing to have Technological segments)
1. Benchmarking Principles (Cont’d)
Each EAQG Member is receiving the same General results
9
Benchmarking PrinciplesBenchmarking Principles
• Customized results
(per company)
– Graphs / Metric (Conformity & Punctuality) with identification of your company Business Units (Optional*)
– Graphs / Metric per Technological Segment (Optional*) with identification of your company Business Unit
(Optional*) : To be decided by EAQG participating Companies
1. Benchmarking Principles (Cont’d)
Each EAQG Member is receiving the Graphs with its Business Units Company positions on the graph
10
Metrics DefinitionMetrics Definition
» Conformity:
• Escape – Non Conformity level after delivery to the customer Item Escape Rate expressed in PPM
(Definition in § 7.1.1 IER)
» Punctuality:
• On Time Delivery of items to the customer Delivered items expressed in %
(Definition in § 8.1 OTD)
According to Metrics definitionmade by EAQG Working Group
Period of Measurement: 6 months rolling average or in exceptional case 12 months based on volume of parts
Double click to open the document
2. Metrics Definition
11
Industry SegmentsIndustry Segments
• Option to have the benchmarking results per Technological Segment
• 5 defined Technological Segments made by the dedicated Working Group
after collection of identified segments made by each EAQG participating Member
(See 5 Segments next slide)
Benchmarking per Technological Segment
3. Technological Segments
12
Industry SegmentsIndustry Segments
3. Technological Segments Definition
EAQG segment id. EAQG segments keywords
TS1 Details parts or machined parts or metal machining or manufactured parts or finished parts
TS2 Systems or equipments or avionics or others sub systems suppliers
TS3 Raw material or forging or casting or non metallic material or plastics parts suppliers
TS4 Hardware or technical products or fasteners or wiring
TS5 Barrels, aerostructures, structures suppliers
13
EAQG MembersEAQG Members4. EAQG Company members
Advanced Electronics Company
AgustaWestland
Airbus
Airbus Military
Alenia
AVIO
BAE Systems
CassidianDassault Aviation
EADS ASTRIUM
Elbit Systems
Eurocopter
Fokker Aerospace
GE Aviation Systems
HEGAN (ITP)
Hispano Suiza
IAI
Liebherr
MBDA
Meggitt
Messier-Dowty
MTU
PFW
RAFAEL
Rolls-Royce
SAABSAFRAN
SAGEM
SNECMA
SONACA
SUKHOI
THALES
Turbomeca
Volvo Aero.ZODIAC Aerospace
14
5. Participating EAQG Company members
EAQGBench-
marking2010
Number of EAQG Members
participating
Number of EAQG Members
NOT participating
Total EAQG Company Members
Partici-pation Rate
22 13 35 63 %
Percentage of participation:
• / of Total EAQG Companies: 63 %
Participating EAQG MembersParticipating EAQG Members
15
Benchmarking ResultsBenchmarking Results
Benchmarking
55184
All
16
Benchmarking ResultsBenchmarking Results
All
69 %
Benchmarking
22
Benchmarking ResultsBenchmarking Results
Benchmarking
Comparison with Automotive industries
All
39355184
AutomotiveAerospace & Defence
28
Benchmarking ResultsBenchmarking Results
Benchmarking
Comparison with Automotive industries
All
95 %69 %
AutomotiveAerospace & Defence
29
Benchmarking ResultsBenchmarking Results
Data Type Ave-rage TS1 TS2 TS3 TS4 TS5
Conformity (ppm) 55.184 15.979 130.638 55.081 46.663 5.209
Punctuality (%)69 77 68 80 79 67
ComparisonAerospace & Defence Automotive
Conformity (ppm)55.184 393
Punctuality (%)69 95
6. Benchmarking Results Benchmarking
30
Next StepsNext Steps
7. Next Steps
Extend Performance Metrics initiative at IAQG level (IAQG Strategy Improvement stream – Performance)
To be implemented early 2011 at International level
31
32
Performance Index Development • Whole Aerospace and Defense Supply Chain is estimated
to :
– 14000 sites certified to 9100, 9110 or 9100 sites
– 8000 sites planning certified (rough order of magnitude)
– Several thousands of other suppliers
• A representative sample of this supply chain is around 500 suppliers,
• Global development plan leads to first index publication in spring next year
•Any suppliers willing to join are welcome
33
Questions?