Community Profile: Tulsa County

COMMUNITY PROFILE:

TULSA COUNTYFOCUS ON WOMEN

Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human

Services Commission

Presented to The Mayor’s Commission on the Status of Women

August 3, 2013

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDSTotal populationSexAgeRace and Hispanic Origin

Click icon to add picture

1910

1914

1918

1922

1926

1930

1934

1938

1942

1946

1950

1954

1958

1962

1966

1970

1974

1978

1982

1986

1990

1994

1998

2002

2006

2010

2014

2018

2022

2026

2030

2034

2038

2042

2046

2050

2054

2058

2062

2066

2070

2074

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

34995

109023

187574193363

251686

346038401663

470593503341

563299603403

Tulsa County2012 to 2075 Forecast

Based on Linear Trend From 1960 to 2011

Tulsa County Annual Estimates 1960-2011 (Source: US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division)Linear TrendlineTulsa Forecast 2012-2075 (Source: Oklahoma Department of Commerce)Tulsa Decennial Census 1910-2010 (Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census)

934,215

DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION BY AGE BY SEX: TULSA COUNTY, 2012

Total Under 5 Under 18 65+ 85+0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

48.7% 50.7% 51.2%41.8%

32.4%

51.3% 49.3% 48.8%58.2%

67.6%

FemaleMale

Source: US Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates.

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN LIFE EXPECTANCY

Life expectancy for men and women in 1920 was 1 year difference

Life expectancy for men and women in 1990 was 7 years difference

Life expectancy for men and women in 2011 is 5 years difference

At birth, there are more males than females. By age 36, the trend turns to more females than males. At age 100, women outnumber men by 8 to 1

LIFE EXPECTANCY BY SEX: U.S., 1900 TO 2011, AND TULSA COUNTY, 2009

1900 1920 1940 1960 1990 2011 Tulsa Co.

2009

-

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

48.354.6

65.2

73.178.8 81.1 78.5

46.353.6

60.866.6

71.876.3

73.3Female Male

Source: US Census Bureau, 2012 Population Estimates.

Population Trends and Projections by Age GroupTulsa County, 1970 - 2030

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2010 Censuses; US Census Bureau, Population Estimates Division, Population Projections, 2000 - 2030.

6.3

6.6

7.4

7.4

7.7

7.7

8.5

16.6

17.1

18.2

18.9

18.4

19.8

25.9

9.2

9.7

9.7

10

10.1

13.5

10.7

47.8

50.5

52.6

51.9

52.2

49.1

46.2

17.5

14.1

10.4

10.4

10.4

9

8.1

2030

2020

2010

2000

1990

1980

1970

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of population

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-64 65-84 85+

1.9

1.4

1.2

.9

.6

Pro

ject

ions 2.5

2.1

Race Comparison for Total Population and Young ChildrenTulsa County, 2012 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, Population Division, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race, and Hispanic Origin for the United States and States: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012,“ June 2013; US Census Bureau, Population Division, “Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race, and Hispanic Origin for Counties: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012,“ June 2013.

396,48064.6%

64,21010.5%

35,5735.8%

15,1832.5%

32,2465.3%

70,12411.4%

21,94648.4%

5,45612.0% 2,799

6.2%

1,2232.7%

4,91010.8%

9,05019.9%

White Black American Indian Asian Other/2+ races Hispanic/Latino

Total population = 613,816 Under 5 population = 45,384

10

DISTRIBUTION OF CHILDREN UNDER AGE 5 BY RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN: TULSA COUNTY, 2000 & 2010

2,500

7,500

12,500

17,500

22,500

27,500

32,500

37,500

42,500

NH White NH Black NH Am. Ind.

NH Asian NH 2+ races

Hispanic

2000 24962 5981 2495 722 2834 4323

2010 21430 5427 2930 1095 4475 9231

2,500

7,500

12,500

17,500

22,500

27,500

Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Censuses.

+7.9%

-14.1%

-9.3%

+17.4%+51.7%

+57.9%

+113.5%

FAMILY, CHILDREN AND YOUTH


FAMILY

MARITAL STATUS AMONG WOMEN AGE 20 AND OVER: TULSA COUNTY, 2011

20 & over 20-34 35-64 65+0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

19.8%

49.1%

9.8%

2.8%

51.1%

40.3%

60.5%

41.8%

2.3% 2.6% 2.7% 0.5%

9.7%

0.8%4.0%

38.8%

17.1%

7.3%

23.0%

16.1%

Never married Now married SeparatedWidowed Divorced

Source: US Census Bureau, 2011 American Community Survey.

Living Arrangements of Related Children Under 18Tulsa County, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2010

Source: US Census Bureau, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 & 2010 Censuses.

Married Couple Male-headed Female-headed Other relatives0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100% 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

1970 82% 1% 11% 4%

1980 74% 2% 16% 6%

1990 71% 3% 18% 5%

2000 65% 5% 21% 7%

2010 61% 7% 23% 9%

Children living with 1 or both parents

Children in Non-Traditional SettingsTulsa County, 2000 and 2010

Source: US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census; Oklahoma Department of Human Services.

Living withgrandparents

Living withother relatives

Foster care Institutions0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000 2000 2010

2000 7,942 2,565 746 335

% of children 5.4 1.7 0.5 0.2

2010 10,434 3,404 1,105 282

% of children 6.8 2.2 0.7 0.2

16

FAMILY TYPE FOR CHILDREN UNDER AGE 6 BY RACE AND ETHNICITY, TULSA COUNTY 2010

Total NH White

Black Am. Ind. Asian Other 2+ races

Hispanic0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

66.2%73.2%

29.3%

58.4%

89.8%

73.0%55.5%

71.5%

8.9%8.0%

10.5%

11.5%

4.1%

10.3%

11.0%

9.9%

24.9%18.7%

60.2%

30.1%

6.1%16.7%

33.4%

18.6%

Married couple Male-headed Female-headed

Source: US Census Bureau, 2010 Census.

Oklahoma’s Prison PopulationFiscal Years 1950 - 2008

Source: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2008

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000Prison population

INCARCERATION OF WOMEN

Oklahoma has the highest female incarceration rate among states at 132/100,000 – almost double national average (68)

2,700 Oklahoma women were incarcerated in 2011 67% for non-violent offenses

3% of Oklahoma children have at least one parent in prison Children with an incarcerated parent are five times more likely to

spend time in prison themselves Average length of stay is 1.9 years 3 year recidivism rate is 14.4% Offense categories (fy2010 receptions)

Possession/obtaining CDS: 23.8% Distribution CDS: 19.1% Forgery: 8.5% Larceny: 7.1% Assault: 7.0%

PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED MOTHERS IN OKLAHOMA

Fath

er

Mat

erna

l gra

ndm

othe

r

Mot

her's

sibling

Other

relativ

es o

f mot

her

Pate

rnal g

rand

mot

her

Foster

car

e0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0% 31.0%28.0%

8.0% 8.0%6.0% 6.0%

Source:

LIVE BIRTHS BY RACE/HISPANIC ORIGIN, TULSA COUNTY, 1991-2008

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

NH White

NH Black

NH Amer. Ind.

NH Asian/PI

Hispanic

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (11/2012).

TOTAL FERTILITY RATES BY RACE/HISPANIC ORIGIN, TULSA COUNTY, 1991-2008

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

NH White NH Black NH Amer. Ind.NH Asian/PI Hispanic Total

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

Summary of Risk Factors for InfantsTulsa County and State of Oklahoma, 2008

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.

12.1%

43.9%

8%

23.2%

7%

1.8%

31.5%

17.6%

12.2%

13.7%

42.3%

5.4%

21.4%

6.9%

1.4%

34.8%

20.5%

11%

Teen mother(age 15-19)

Unmarried mother

Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

Premature(<37 weeks gest.)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of Births

Tulsa Co.

Oklahoma

Tulsa County births: 9,530Oklahoma births: 54,753

23

BIRTHS BY MOTHER’S EDUCATION LEVEL FOR TULSA COUNTY, 2008

Less than HS HS diploma Some college College degree

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

2,210

3,359

1,716

2,233

(23.2%)

(35.3%)

(18.0%)

(23.5%)

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health (OK2SHARE).

Infant Mortality RatesTulsa County and Oklahoma, 1980 through 2008

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health website, OK2SHARE.

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

0

5

10

15

20Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births

Tulsa County Oklahoma

Tulsa County 10.412.3 1010.7 9.810.7 9.9 8.8 10.4 9.5 9 9.2 8.3 10.3 9.7 9.3 9.1 6.9 6.9 7.1 9 7 8.8 7.5 6.6 8.2 8.7 9.4 7.5

Oklahoma 12.311.411.910.310.210.6 9.9 9.2 8.7 8.1 9 9.3 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.4 7.4 8.5 8.5 8.4 7.2 8.1 7.8 7.9 8.1 8 8.6 7.3

In 2009, there were 72 infant deaths in Tulsa County, 121 in Oklahoma County, and a total of 430 in the state.

“Healthy People 2020” goal = 6.0

per 1,000

WOMEN AS CAREGIVERS

Total of 65.7 million caregivers in the US (29% of adult population)

An estimated 66% of caregivers are women

The average caregiver age is 48

CHILDREN AND YOUTH

OKLAHOMA RANKINGS ON INDICATORS OF CHILD WELL-BEING

Indicator Oklahoma rank

Best State (#1)

Worst State (#50)

Overall child well-being

36 New Hampshire

New Mexico

Economic well-being 25 North Dakota Mississippi

Education 40 Massachusetts

Nevada

Health 43 Maine Montana

Family and Community

39 New Hampshire

Mississippi

Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation, “KIDS COUNT Data Book, 2013.”

OKLAHOMA RANKINGS ON SPECIFIC CHILD INDICATORS

IndicatorU.S. rate

Tulsa County

rate

Oklahoma rate

Oklahoma rank

Best rank

Median family income $58,000 $54,442 $49,400 7 50

Children in poverty 23% 23% 23% 30 1

Children below 200% poverty 45% 47% 49% 35 1

Population in poverty 16% 15% 17% 33 1

Children 3 & 4 not enrolled in preschool 54% 50% 59% 34 1

Population 25-34 not high school graduate

12% 15% 13% 36 1

Children living in concentrated poverty 12% 16% 12% 34 1

Children in single parent families 35% 30% 36% 30 1

Children living with neither parent 5% 10% 6% 41 1

Low birth weight babies 8.1% 8.8% 8.4% 30 1

Children confirmed victims of maltreatment

9/1,000 9/1,000 8/1,000 19 1


THE ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACE) STUDY PYRAMID

Early Death

Disease, Disability and Social Problems

Adoption of Health-risk Behaviors

Social, Emotional and Cognitive Impairment

Disrupted Neurodevelopment

Adverse Childhood Experiences

Conception

Death

Mechanisms by which Adverse Childhood Experiences Influence Health and Well-being

throughout the LifespanSource: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “About the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study.”

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES…

Recurrent physical abuse

Recurrent emotional abuse

Sexual abuse

An alcohol or drug abuser

An incarcerated household member

Someone who is chronically depressed, suicidal, institutionalized or mentally ill

Mother being treated violently

Living with one or neither parent

Emotional or physical neglect

Source: The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study website: www.acestudy.org, “What are Adverse Childhood Experieinces (ACE’s).”

…GROWING UP IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES:

Smoking

Overeating

Physical inactivity

Heavy alcohol use

Drug use

Promiscuity

…ADOPTION OF HEALTH RISK BEHAVIORS…

Nicotine addiction

Alcoholism

Drug addiction

Obesity

Depression

Suicide

Injuries

Unintentional pregnancy

Adolescent pregnancy

Heart disease

Cancer

Chronic lung and liver disease

Stroke

Diabetes

Fetal death

Sexually transmitted diseases

…DISEASE, DISABILITY AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS

IN ADULTHOOD

ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCESCOUNTY RANKINGS

Rankings: 1 = best, 77 = worst*Indicates a tie with at least one other county

Source: Oklahoma KIDS COUNT Factbook, 2006-2007, Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy

Tulsa County

Parental separation or divorce 49

Incarcerated household member 76

Mentally ill household member 77

Substance abusing household member

76*

Violence against mother 57

Psychological, physical & sexual abuse

12

Emotional & physical neglect 4

Overall ranking 31

Child Abuse and Neglect Reports Received and Accepted for Investigation or Assessment

Oklahoma, Fiscal Year 2000 - 2012

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000Number of reports received and accepted

Reports received 53,548 53,460 53,562 57,383 59,329 61,613 63,128 63,931 65,493 64,293 64,710 66,541 68,111

Reports accepted 35,477 35,360 38,077 36,967 36,232 36,605 36,445 36,034 35,080 30,625 28,638 29,468 32,421

Notes: Each “report” of child abuse and/or neglect “received” and “accepted” may involve multiple children.

Number of Children Assessed or Investigated and Confirmed as Victims of Child Abuse and Neglect

Oklahoma, Fiscal Year 2000- 2012

Source: Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000Number of children

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%Confirmation rate

Assessed or Investigated 62,023 56,251 62,795 62,626 60,770 61,926 63,116 62,559 61,327 53,394 45,811 48,393 44,232

Confirmed 14,273 13,394 13,903 12,971 12,347 13,328 13,827 13,191 11,714 8,605 7,248 8,110 9,842

Confirmation rate 23% 24% 22% 21% 20% 22% 22% 21% 19% 16% 16% 17% 22%

Notes: Each child assessed, investigated or confirmed for child abuse and/or neglect indicates one child. Since a child may be assessed, investigated or confirmed multiple times in a year, these values are not necessarily unduplicated counts of children. “Confirmation rate” is the number of children confirmed abused and/or neglected per 100 children investigated or assessed.

Child Deaths Due to AbuseOklahoma, Fiscal Years 1978 - 2010

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Children & Family Services Division.

75

12 13

1821

16 16

24

31

2325

18

38

2023

3134

29

4245

47 48

3835

27

51

40

32

3941

52

38

1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 20100

10

20

30

40

50

60

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

A woman is assaulted or beaten every 9 seconds in the US

Nationally, 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men have experienced severe physical violence by an intimate partner

876 homicides due to domestic violence identified from 1998 to 2008 in Oklahoma

Men who as children witnessed their parents’ domestic violence were twice as likely to abuse their own wives than sons of nonviolent parents

PERCENTAGE OF 4TH GRADERS NOT PROFICIENT IN READING BY RACE AND HISPANIC ORIGIN: UNITED STATES: 2011


HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATES: TULSA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 2011-12 SCHOOL YEAR

Econ. disadvantaged

White

Hispanic

Asian

American Indian

Black

All students

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

80%

86%

84%

92%

81%

85%

85%

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Education, Office of Accountability, 2011-12 AMO (Annual Measurable Objectives); Oklahoma State Department of Education ”no child Left Behind Act” Annual Report Card 2010-11.

Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

38.3%

19.1%

4.2%

17.2%

22.7%

7.2%

19.7%

38.7%

23.1%

3.8%

25.6%

18.1%

8.2%

24.1%

Alcohol

Marijuana

Methamphetamine

Offered/sold/givenillegal drugs at school

Smoked cigarettesduring past month

Drove after/while drinkingalcohol in past month

Rode with drinkingdriver in past month

0% 20%40%60%80%100%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2011 Oklahoma

2011 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Alcohol, Other Drug & Tobacco Use

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S., 2011

Used once or more during past 30 days...

Ever used...

Source: Centers for Disease Control, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System; Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE.

50.5%

5%

57.1%

20.5%

6.3%

33%

50.8%

47.4%

6.2%

60.2%

18%

7.8%

28.2%

49.5%

Ever hadsexual intercourse

Had sex before age 13

Used condom last time

Used birth controlpills last time

Attempted suicidein past year

Overweight or obese(according to BMI)

Physical activity for60 min/day 5 of past 7 days

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2003 Oklahoma

2005 Oklahoma

2007 Oklahoma

2009 Oklahoma

2011 Oklahoma

2011 US

Youth Risk Behavior Survey:Summary of Sexual Behaviors, Suicide & Physical Health

High School Students, Oklahoma, 2003 through 2011, and U.S., 2011

na

Characteristics of Births to Teen Mothers (Age 15-19)Tulsa County and State of Oklahoma, 2008

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Vital Statistics.

87.7%

10.4%

59%

7.7%

2%

61.1%

39.9%

12.3%

20.9%

2.8%

81.6%

7.1%

54.1%

7.9%

1.8%

67.6%

46.9%

11.6%

20.8%

3.6%

Unmarried

Poor prenatal care(3rd trimester/no care)

Mother w/ <12th gradeeducation

Low birthweight(1500-2499 grams)

Very low birthweight(<1500 grams)

Short birth spacing(<24 mos. apart)

Very short birth spacing(<18 mos. apart)

Premature(<37 weeks gest.)

1+ previous births

2+ previous births

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Births

Tulsa Co.

Oklahoma

Tulsa County births to teens: 1,152Tulsa County teen birth rate: 60.1 (per 1,000 females age 15-19)

Oklahoma births to teens: 7,492Oklahoma teen birth rate: 60.2 (per 1,000 females age 15-19)

AGING POPULATION

THE AGING POPULATION IN TULSA COUNTY IS PREDOMINANTLY FEMALE, MANY LIVE ALONE AND OVER A THIRD HAVE A DISABILITY

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

58.4%

28.7%

3.8%

23.5%20.7%

36.6%

1.8%


LIVING ARRANGEMENTS OF PERSONS 65 AND OLDER: TULSA COUNTY, 2011

21,411

48,883

2,826 1,571

Live aloneFamily householdsGroup quartersOther

28.7%

2.1%3.8%

65.4%


ECONOMIC CONDITIONSLabor force participationLiving wage and povertyRole of educationProgram participationIncome inequality


LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION

Unemployment RatesTulsa County and Oklahoma, 1990 - 2013

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

1 1

20

12

Ma

y 2

01

3

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

Unemployment Rate

Tulsa Couny Oklahoma

Tulsa Couny 4.3 5.1 5.6 6.1 5.4 4.0 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.4 2.8 3.3 5.0 6.0 4.9 4.2 3.9 3.9 3.6 6.8 7.5 6.4 5.5 5.4

Oklahoma 5.7 6.2 6.2 6.0 5.6 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.4 3.6 3.1 3.7 4.8 5.6 5.0 4.5 4.1 4.1 3.7 6.7 6.9 5.9 5.2 5.3

48

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES FOR PERSONS 16 & OLDER BY SEX

1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

MenWomenBoth sexes

Source: Toossi, Mitra. “Employment Outlook: 2010-2020: Labor Force Projections to 2020: A More Slowly Growing Workforce,” Monthly Labor Review, January 2012.

57.1%

68.2%62.5%

Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (5/20/2013).

49

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES AMONG PERSONS 16 TO 19 BY SEX

1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

MenWomenBoth sexes


25.2%

27.9%

26.5%


50


1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

MenWomenBoth sexes


62.3%

69.4%65.9%


51


1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

MenWomenBoth sexes


74.6%

88.1%

81.3%


52


1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

MenWomenBoth sexes


27.5%

35.1%

31.0%


53

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES AMONG PERSONS 75 & OLDER BY SEX

1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

MenWomenBoth sexes


8.0%

12.8%

10.0%


54

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION RATES FOR PERSONS 16 & OLDER BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND BY SEX

1990 2000 2010 2020 Proj.

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

Hispanic menAsian menNH White menOther race menBlack menOther race womenBlack womenNH White womenAsian womenHispanic women


71.0%

63.4%

67.2%

75.9%

56.1%56.1%

63.1%59.5%57.9%57.2%


LIVING WAGE AND POVERTY

COMPARISON OF SELF-SUFFICIENCY WAGE TO POVERTY GUIDELINES, BY SIZE OF FAMILYTULSA COUNTY, 2013

Family Size

Self-Sufficiency

Wage (annual)

Poverty Guidelines (annual)

Dollar Difference

Self-Sufficiency Percent of Poverty

One person

$21,227($10.05/hour)

$11,490($5.44/hour)

$9,737 185%

Two persons

$38,033($18.01/hour)

$15,510($7.34/hour)

$22,523 245%

Three persons

$43,526($20.61/hour)

$19,530($9.25/hour)

$23,996 223%

Four persons

$51,027($12.08/hour/

adult)

$23,550($5.58/hour/

adult)$27,477 217%

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wages shown in table, family of two consists of one adult and one preschooler; family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child; family of four consists of two adults, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment.

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/24/2013, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2013.

Family of Three, Tulsa County, 2013

$75,160

$54,442

$39,730

$10,800$15,312

$19,530

$36,131

$21,502

WelfareWage

MinimumWage

PovertyWage

185% PovertyWage

EstimatedMedian Family

Income*(2007-11 ACS)

$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000Annual Wage

Self-Sufficiency Wage = $43,526($20.61/hr)

Comparison of Wages: Self-Sufficiency, Welfare, Minimum, Poverty, 185% of Poverty, and Median Family Income

($5.12/hr) ($7.25/hr) ($9.25/hr) ($17.11/hr)

Married-couple families w/ children <18

($26/hr)

All families w/ children <18

Male-headed families w/ children <18

Female-headed families w/ children <18

($36/hr)

($10/hr)

($19/hr)

Source: Oklahoma Association of Community Action Agencies and the Oklahoma Asset Building Coalition, December 2009, The Self-Sufficiency Standard for Oklahoma 2009; Federal Register Notice, 01/24/2013, Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines; Oklahoma State Dept. of Human Services; U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.

Notes: For the self-sufficiency wage, family of three consists of one adult, one preschooler and one schoolage child. Hourly wages given assume full-time, year-round employment. Welfare wage is the combined value of TANF, SNAP, & WIC. Values shown for median family income are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

Median Family IncomeBy Family Type and Presence of Children under 18

State of Oklahoma and Tulsa County, 2007-11 Estimates

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.

$50,834

$67,153

$20,761

$34,382

$54,442

$75,160

$21,502

$39,730

$58,588

$64,099

$36,811

$43,880

$64,983

$73,226

$39,728

$45,427

Oklahoma

All families

Married-couple

Female-headed

Male-headed

Tulsa County

All families

Married-couple

Female-headed

Male-headed

$0$25,000$50,000$75,000

Families WITH children

$0 $25,000 $50,000 $75,000

Families WITHOUT childrenNote: Values shown are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

Ratio of Income to Poverty LevelPercentage of Total Population and Selected Age Groups

Oklahoma and Tulsa County, 2007-11 Estimates

Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.

Totalpop

Under18

Under6

65+ Totalpop

Under18

Under6

65+0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percentage of population

Below 100% Below 185% Below 200%

Below 100% 16% 23% 27% 10% 15% 23% 27% 8%

Below 185% 35% 45% 51% 31% 32% 44% 50% 26%

Below 200% 38% 49% 55% 35% 35% 47% 53% 30%

Oklahoma Tulsa County

Note: Values shown are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

Ratio of Income to Poverty Level: 100%Percentage of Total Population and Sex and Age

Tulsa County, 2007-11 Estimates


Total pop Under 6 6-18 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75 & older0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%Percentage of population

Female Male

Female 16.4% 27.3% 19.9% 26% 20.8% 14.2% 9.9% 9.4% 8% 10.8%

Male 13.7% 26.7% 20.5% 17.4% 11.8% 10.1% 8.7% 8.5% 6.2% 7.1%

Poverty Level by Family TypeTulsa County, 2007-11 Estimates


11.1%

4.9%

8.1%

8.2%

16.3%

4.9%

2.3%

13.5%

16.8%

12.2%

30%

15%

8.8%

32.2%

40.8%

45.8%

59.7%

32.5%

9.8%

All families

Married-couple family:

With related children under 18 years:

Under 5 years only

Under 5 years and 5 to 17 years

5 to 17 years only

No related children under 18 years

Male householder, no wife present:


Under 5 years only


5 to 17 years only


Female householder, no husband present:


Under 5 years only


5 to 17 years only


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF PERSONS LIVING IN POVERTY, 2007-11

An estimated 88,355 persons live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 15.1%

In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 74,217 personslive in poverty, for a rate of 19.4%.

9400.05

9400.06

95

55

78.02

59

77.02

56

58.08

66

54.0254.01

111

78.01

93

75.16

58.07

67.07

67.08

73.08

67.05

2

94.01

91.04

75.13

92

49

1

94.0290.03

65.07

77.01

91.01

29

76.24

76.38

65.06

75.15

90.07

90.09

67.03

62

27

57

67.01

34

88

58.05 58.06

75.0675.08

79

25

4847

12

58.01

821614 6015

5

75.1176.35

85.02

76.37

74.09

76.36

90.08

75.24

84

87

38

52

53

37

40

86

70

42 39

75.20

73.11

74.07

30

51

17

80.01

76.34

8372 89

6

13

7

45

9

80.02

76.25

8

71.02

44

10

76.11

73.05

23.01

75.03

76.14 76.19 74.11

69.07

76.39

71.01

76.30

75.22

76.32

76.09

69.06

76.33

76.15

69.05

74.1574.12 74.08

76.16

75.12

73.10

76.13

69.02

73.06

69.03

90.06

74.14

69.01

75.10

73.12

41.01

75.07

75.19

76.17

76.31

76.18

75.18

75.23

76.29

76.20 74.13 74.02

43.02

50.02

90.04

74.10

43.01

18 73.0919

4631 32 36

35

76.12

3334

85.01

2120

68.01

50.01

76.4176.42

68.03

76.08

Percent in Poverty

Less than 5%

5 to 9%

10 to 24%

25 to 32%

33% or greater

City of Tulsa

Apache

96th

66th

121st

91st

Admiral

31st

61st

49th

W151st

181st

Pine

36th

65th

W

193r

d E

177t

h E

161s

t E

97t h

W

81st

W

113t

h W

126th

Source: US Census Bureau, 2007-11 American Community Survey.Prepared by the Community Service Council with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission (4/9/13)

Estimated Percentage of Persons Living in Poverty, 2007-11Tulsa County and Part Osage County by Census Tract

Note: Data estimates used for this map are based on a sample survey, and due to the small geographicarea, margins of error are very high.

Peo r

i a

Min

go

145 t

h E

Gar

nett

Mem

oria

l

Yale

Sher

idan

Har

vard

Lew

is

129 t

h E

33rd

W

Uni

on

Elw

o od

2013 poverty guidelinesfor family of 3:

100% = $19,530130% = $25,389185% = $36,131

An estimated 14,132 children under age 6 live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 27.0%.

In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 12,121 children under age 6 live in poverty, for a rate of 35.2%.

ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN UNDER AGE 6 LIVING IN POVERTY, 2007-11

9400.05

9400.06

95

55

78.02

59

77.02

56

58.08

66

54.0254.01

111

78.01

93

75.16

58.07

67.07

67.08

73.08

67.05

2

94.01

91.04

75.13

92

49

1

94.0290.03

65.07

77.01

91.01

29

76.24

76.38

65.06

75.15

90.07

90.09

67.03

62

27

57

67.01

34

88

58.05 58.06

75.0675.08

79

25

4847

12

58.01

821614 6015

5

75.1176.35

85.02

76.37

74.09

76.36

90.08

75.24

84

87

38

52

53

37

40

86

70

42 39

75.20

73.11

74.07

30

51

17

80.01

76.34

8372 89

6

13

7

45

9

80.02

76.25

8

71.02

44

10

76.11

73.05

23.01

75.03

76.14 76.19 74.11

69.07

76.39

71.01

76.30

75.22

76.32

76.09

69.06

76.33

76.15

69.05

74.1574.12 74.08

76.16

75.12

73.10

76.13

69.02

73.06

69.03

90.06

74.14

69.01

75.10

73.12

41.01

75.07

75.19

76.17

76.31

76.18

75.18

75.23

76.29

76.20 74.13 74.02

43.02

50.02

90.04

74.10

43.01

18 73.0919

4631 32 36

35

76.12

3334

85.01

2120

68.01

50.01

76.4176.42

68.03

76.08

Under 6: Percent in PovertyLess than 10%

10 to 24%

25 to 32%

33 to 49%

50% or greater

City of Tulsa

Apache

96th

66th

121st

91st

Admiral

31st

61st

49th

W

151st

181st

Pine

36th

65th

W

193r

d E

177t

h E

161s

t E

97t h

W

81st

W

113t

h W

126th


Estimated Percentage of Persons Under Age 6 Living in Poverty, 2007-11

Tulsa County and Part Osage County by Census Tract


Peo r

i a

Min

go

145 t

h E

Garn

ett

Mem

oria

l

Yale

Sher

idan

Harv

ard

Lew

is

129 t

h E

33rd

W

Uni

on

Elw

o od


100% = $19,530130% = $25,389185% = $36,131

An estimated 33,867 children under age 18 live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 22.6%.

In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 28,762 children under age 18live in poverty, for a rate of 30.6%.

ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN UNDER AGE 18 LIVING IN POVERTY, 2007-11

9400.05

9400.06

95

55

78.02

59

77.02

56

58.08

66

54.0254.01

111

78.01

93

75.16

58.07

67.07

67.08

73.08

67.05

2

94.01

91.04

75.13

92

49

1

94.0290.03

65.07

77.01

91.01

29

76.24

76.38

65.06

75.15

90.07

90.09

67.03

62

27

57

67.01

34

88

58.05 58.06

75.0675.08

79

25

4847

12

58.01

821614 6015

5

75.1176.35

85.02

76.37

74.09

76.36

90.08

75.24

84

87

38

52

53

37

40

86

70

42 39

75.20

73.11

74.07

30

51

17

80.01

76.34

8372 89

6

13

7

45

9

80.02

76.25

8

71.02

44

10

76.11

73.05

23.01

75.03

76.14 76.19 74.11

69.07

76.39

71.01

76.30

75.22

76.32

76.09

69.06

76.33

76.15

69.05

74.1574.12 74.08

76.16

75.12

73.10

76.13

69.02

73.06

69.03

90.06

74.14

69.01

75.10

73.12

41.01

75.07

75.19

76.17

76.31

76.18

75.18

75.23

76.29

76.20 74.13 74.02

43.02

50.02

90.04

74.10

43.01

18 73.0919

4631 32 36

35

76.12

3334

85.01

2120

68.01

50.01

76.4176.42

68.03

76.08

Under 18: Percent in Poverty

Less than 10%

10 to 24%

25 to 32%

33 to 49%

50% or greater

City of Tulsa

Apache

96th

66th

121st

91st

Admiral

31st

61st

49th

W

151st

181st

Pine

36th

65th

W

193r

d E

177t

h E

161s

t E

9 7t h

W

81st

W

113t

h W

126th


Estimated Percentage of Persons Under Age 18 Living in Poverty, 2007-11



Peor

ia

Min

go

145t

h E

Garn

ett

Mem

oria

l

Yale

Sher

idan

Harv

ard

Lew

is

129t

h E

33r d

W

Uni

on

Elw

ood


100% = $19,530130% = $25,389185% = $36,131

An estimated 5,696 persons age 65 and over live in poverty in Tulsa County, for a rate of 8.2%.

In the City of Tulsa, an estimated 4,574 persons age 65 and over live in poverty, for a rate of 9.6%.

ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE OF PERSONS 65 & OVER LIVING IN POVERTY, 2007-11

9400.05

9400.06

95

55

78.02

59

77.02

56

58.08

66

54.0254.01

111

78.01

93

75.16

58.07

67.07

67.08

73.08

67.05

2

94.01

91.04

75.13

92

49

1

94.0290.03

65.07

77.01

91.01

29

76.24

76.38

65.06

75.15

90.07

90.09

67.03

62

27

57

67.01

34

88

58.05 58.06

75.0675.08

79

25

4847

12

58.01

821614 6015

5

75.1176.35

85.02

76.37

74.09

76.36

90.08

75.24

84

87

38

52

53

37

40

86

70

42 39

75.20

73.11

74.07

30

51

17

80.01

76.34

8372 89

6

13

7

45

9

80.02

76.25

8

71.02

44

10

76.11

73.05

23.01

75.03

76.14 76.19 74.11

69.07

76.39

71.01

76.30

75.22

76.32

76.09

69.06

76.33

76.15

69.05

74.1574.12 74.08

76.16

75.12

73.10

76.13

69.02

73.06

69.03

90.06

74.14

69.01

75.10

73.12

41.01

75.07

75.19

76.17

76.31

76.18

75.18

75.23

76.29

76.20 74.13 74.02

43.02

50.02

90.04

74.10

43.01

18 73.0919

4631 32 36

35

76.12

3334

85.01

2120

68.01

50.01

76.4176.42

68.03

76.08

Percent 65+ in Poverty

Less than 5%

5 to 9%

10 to 19%

20 to 29%

30% or greater

City of Tulsa

Apache

96th

66th

121st

91st

Admiral

31st

61st

49th

W

151st

181st

Pine

36th

65th

W

193r

d E

177t

h E

161s

t E

9 7t h

W

81st

W

113t

h W

126th


Estimated Percentage of Persons Age 65 and Over Living in Poverty, 2007-11



Peor

ia

Min

go

145t

h E

Garn

ett

Mem

oria

l

Yale

Sher

idan

Harv

ard

Lew

is

129t

h E

33r d

W

Uni

on

Elw

ood


100% = $19,530130% = $25,389185% = $36,131

ROLE OF EDUCATION

Educational Attainment for Persons Age 25 & Older, by SexTulsa County, 2007-11 Estimates


11.8%

26.7%

24.2%

8.1%

19.9%

6.2%

2.1%

0.9%

11.1%

27.7%

25.4%

8.4%

19.3%

6.3%

1.2%

0.6%

12.5%

25.7%

23%

7.8%

20.5%

6.1%

3.1%

1.3%

Less than high school

High school graduate

Some college

Associate degree

Bachelor's degree

Master's degree

Professional school degree

Doctorate degree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Percent of persons 25+

Total

Female

Male

Note: Values shown are midpoint estimates within a 90% confidence range, which can be very wide. Estimates with margins of error exceeding +/- 10% of estimate are shown in italics.

REAL HOURLY WAGE BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENTUNITED STATES, 1973-2012

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45

Less than high school High school Some college College Advanced degree

2012 dol-lars

Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th Edition, table 4.14.

$29.56

$24.46

$18.06

$16.77

$14.63

$37.34

$28.28

$17.30

$15.78

$11.75

REAL HOURLY WAGE BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR WOMENUNITED STATES, 1973-2012

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45


2012 dol-lars


$25.30

$19.10

$13.79

$12.76

$10.31

$31.55

$24.21

$15.53

$13.70

$10.06

REAL HOURLY WAGE BY EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR MENUNITED STATES, 1973-2012

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

2012

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45


2012 dol-lars


$31.07

$27.97

$20.73

$20.27

$17.10

$43.42

$32.54

$19.20

$17.41

$12.75

Real Hourly Wage by Educational Attainment, by SexUnited States, 2012

Less thanhigh school

High school College degree Advanced degree$0.00

$10.00

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00

$50.00Real hourly wage (2012 dollars)

Both sexes Women Men

Both sexes $11.75 $15.78 $28.28 $37.34

Women $10.06 $13.70 $24.21 $31.55

Men $12.75 $17.41 $32.54 $43.42

Women % of Men 78.9% 78.7% 74.4% 72.7%

Source: Economic Policy Institute, The State of Working America, 12th edition, table 4.14.

INCOME INEQUALITY

76

Oklahoma = 8.0

Map credit: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012.

77

TRENDS IN AVERAGE INCOMES OF HOUSEHOLDS BY QUINTILE: 1977-79 TO 2008-10: OKLAHOMA AND UNITED STATES (IN 2009 DOLLARS)

'77-79 '98-00 '05-07 '08-10 '77-79 '98-00 '05-07 '08-10 $-

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$17,537 $19,961 $18,464 $19,827 $19,329 $21,938 $20,660 $20,510

$32,760 $36,947 $35,576 $38,256 $35,393 $42,158 $42,015 $40,506

$45,489 $53,112 $52,751 $54,940

$48,961 $61,395 $62,137 $60,132

$61,263 $75,298 $74,624 $76,132

$64,875

$85,377 $88,025 $85,900

$95,488

$145,324 $156,501 $158,135

$100,499

$158,219 $171,800

$164,494

Bottom Quintile 2nd Quintile Middle Quintile 4th Quintile Top Quintile

Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute, “Pulling Apart: A State-by-State Analysis of Income Trends,” November 15, 2012.

Oklahoma United States

78

SHARES OF AGGREGATE HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY QUINTILE: 2011: TULSA, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA AND UNITED STATES

3.2% 8.5%

14.5%

23.0%

50.8%

Lowest Quintile

Second Quintile

Third Quintile

Fourth Quintile

Highest Quintile

3.5%8.8%

14.8%

23.3%

49.6%

3.3%8.5%

14.0%

22.3%

51.9%

US

Oklahoma Tulsa County

City of Tulsa

2.8%7.6%

12.8%

20.6%56.3%


PROGRAM PARTICIPATION

Participation in Public Assistance ProgramsNumber of Participants and Percentage of Population Participating

During a Single Month, Tulsa County, 2012

116,415

76,569

3,829

9,063

3,667

89,325

2,720

34,358

6,314

19.3%

47%

43.5%

20.2%

8.2%

14.8%

1.8%

55.1%

10.1%

Soonercare Total (185%/100%)

Soonercare <19 (185%)

WIC Infants (185%)

WIC age 1-5 (185%)

Child Care Subsidy <5 (185%)

SNAP Total (130%)

TANF <18 (50%)

Elem. School Free Lunch (130%)

Elem. School Reduced Lunch (185%)

050,000100,000150,000

Number of Participants

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Percent of Population

Source: Oklahoma Dept. of Human Services, Statistical Bulletin, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-12; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census; Oklahoma State Department of Health-WIC Service, Caseload Report, Jan. 2012; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Fast Facts, Jan.2012.

INCOME GUIDELINES FOR FREE AND REDUCED PRICE MEALS FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2012-13

Source: Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 57, March 23, 2012

Household Size

Federal Poverty

Guidelines

Reduced Price Meals: 185% of

poverty

Free Meals: 130% of poverty

1 $11,170 $20,665 $14,521

2 $15,130 $27,991 $19,669

3 $19,090 $35,317 $24,817

4 $23,050 $42,643 $29,965

5 $27,010 $49,969 $35,113

6 $30,970 $57,295 $40,261

7 $34,930 $64,621 $45,409

8 $38,890 $71,947 $50,557For each add’l member, add

$3,960 $7,326 $5,148

Elementary School Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Lunch Program

By School District, Tulsa County, 2011-12 School Year

Source: Oklahoma State Dept. of Education, Low Income Report for 2011-2012.

55.5%

80.8%

58.4%

62.6%

54.2%

55.8%

58.4%

45.6%

42.6%

34.3%

33.6%

30.5%

29.4%

28.3%

18.7%

9.5%

9.5%

16.3%

9.8%

14%

11.1%

7.3%

9.5%

2.4%

10%

10.6%

9.6%

7.5%

7.8%

4.2%

Tulsa County Total

Tulsa

Keystone

Sperry

Sand Springs

Union

Liberty

Skiatook

Glenpool

Collinsville

Broken Arrow

Berryhill

Jenks

Owasso

Bixby

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percent of Students Eligible

Free Reduced

Free lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 130% of poverty, which currently is $25,389 for a family of three.

Reduced lunch eligibility requirement: annual household income below 185% of poverty, which currently is $36,131 for a family of three.

Health StatusOklahoma and United States, 1996 - 2012

Source: United Health Foundation, “America’s Health Rankings.“

'96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '120%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%Percent adults reporting fair or poor health

0

10

20

30

40

50State rank

Rank Oklahoma US

Rank 26 32 28 25 42 34 45 41 41 44 42 46 43 42 42 45 41

Oklahoma 13.1% 14% 13.4% 12.6% 17.4% 15.3% 19.6% 17.7% 17.8% 19.7% 18.7% 20.2% 19.2% 18.7% 19.6% 20.5% 20.2%

US 12.9% 12.9% 12.8% 12.6% 13% 13.9% 14% 14.7% 14.7% 14.9% 14.8% 14.7% 14.9% 14.4% 14.5% 14.7% 16.9%

Prevalence of ObesityOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2012


'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%Percent of population estimated to be obese

0

10

20

30

40

50State rank

Rank Oklahoma US

Rank 23 23 22 37 14 14 12 27 14 35 37 22 38 29 37 37 38 44 43 46 46 40 45

Oklahoma 11.6% 11.6% 11.9% 14.1% 12.1% 13.2% 13.5% 16.8% 15.1% 19.5% 21.1% 19.7% 22.6% 22.9% 24.4% 24.9% 26.8% 28.8% 28.8% 30.9% 32% 31.3% 31.1%

US 11.6% 11.6% 12.6% 12.6% 13.7% 14.4% 15.9% 16.8% 16.5% 18.3% 19.6% 20% 20.9% 21.9% 22.9% 23.2% 24.4% 25.1% 26.3% 26.7% 26.9% 27.5% 27.8%

Prevalence of SmokingOklahoma and United States, 1990 - 2012


'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%Percent of population over 18 that smoke regularly

0

10

20

30

40

50State rank

Rank Oklahoma US

Rank 44 42 42 40 37 45 15 28 36 32 41 27 49 42 36 47 46 47 48 46 48 48 47

Oklahoma 33% 28.7% 28.7% 26.6% 25% 26.1% 21.7% 24.1% 24.6% 23.9% 25.2% 23.3% 28.7% 26.6% 25.1% 26.1% 25.1% 25.1% 25.8% 24.7% 25.5% 23.7% 26.1%

US 29.5% 25.2% 25.2% 22.7% 23% 22.2% 22.7% 23.5% 23.2% 22.9% 22.8% 23.2% 23.2% 23.2% 22% 20.9% 20.6% 20.1% 19.8% 18.3% 17.9% 17.3% 21.2%

Cancer Diabetes Heart Dis-ease

Stroke Chronic Low. Resp.

Disease

Accidents Suicide Alzheim. Disease

Total pop 179.6 18.6 219.1 56.7 61.4 61.3 15.1 22.7

Female 150.4 16.4 159.1 57.2 55.6 42.3 5 24.9

Male 221.9 20.9 307 55.6 72.3 83.4 25.8 17.9

25

75

125

175

225

275

325Total pop

Female

AGE-ADJUSTED MORTALITY RATES BY CAUSE BY SEX: TULSA COUNTY, 2009

Source: Oklahoma State Department of Health, OK2SHARE, Mortality Data.

Health Insurance Status, by AgeOklahoma, 2010-11

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, StateHealthFacts.org; Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Oklahoma County Chartbook, May 2009.

1,711,300(46.0%)

156,300(4.2%)

594,100(16.0%)

538,500(14.5%)

79,100(2.1%)

638,500(17.2%)

438,200(45.2%)

42,700(4.4%)

392,400(40.5%)

96,500(10.0%)

1,276,000(51.1%)

112,100(4.5%)

456,500(18.3%)

114,300(4.6%)

538,700(21.6%)

Employer Individual Medicaid Medicare Other public Uninsured

Total Population Under Age 19 Age 19-64

Estimated uninsured non-elderly population, 2008 (Oklahoma Health Care Authority, May 2009):

~ Tulsa County: 16.1%

COMMUNITY PROFILE:

TULSA COUNTYFOCUS ON WOMEN

Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the

Metropolitan Human Services Commission

…is available on our website: www.csctulsa.org

Community Profile: Tulsa County

Documents

Transcript of Community Profile: Tulsa County