Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN-08-01 & RZ-OTH-08-08.

Community DevelopmentDepartme

nt

FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN-08-01LU-MIN-08-01

&&RZ-OTH-08-08RZ-OTH-08-08


nt

Background and Location MapTOTAL 8.5 ACRES• Applicant/Owner –

Christ the King Evangelical Lutheran Church & Preschool Inc.


nt

Background and Location Map• Current FLUM – Ag. &

Timberlands, Mixed Use

• Proposed FLUM – Institutional

• Current Zoning – COM-3 & Agriculture

• Proposed Zoning – Public/Semipublic


nt

EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE MAP

• North-Mixed Use• West- Ag. &

Timberlands• South-Mixed Use &

Ag. & Timberlands• East-Residential


nt

EXISTING ZONING• North- Suburban

Estate-1 • West- Agriculture• South- Agriculture

& Com-3• East- Single-family

Residential


nt

EXISTING USES• North-Animal

Boarding

• West-Vacant

• South-Vacant

• East-Single-family residential


nt

MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS

# of Acres Maximum FAR Maximum Sq. Ft.(1)

Proposed FLUM: Institutional 8.57 0.30 111993

Current FLUM: Agriculture & Timberlands (Flagler County designation)

5.07 0.35 77297

Mixed Use (City Designation) 3.5 0.50 76230Maximum Intensity Permitted Under Current FLUM 153527

NET CHANGE -41534Footnotes:(1) M ax Sq. Ft. = # of Acres X M ax. FAR X 43560 sq.ft/acre

TABLE 1 - FLUM DESIGNATION MAXIMUM DENSITY/INTENSITY ALLOWED


nt

PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS

TABLE 2: PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS

NON-RESIDENTIAL USES

Intensity(1) Transportation

(ADT)(2)

Potable Water

(GPD)(3)Wastewater

(GPD)(4)Stormwater Drainage(5)

Solid Waste, Recreation and

Parks, and Public Education(6)

Proposed FLUM (Institutional) 111993 sq. ft. 6048 19039 11199 N/A N/A

Current FLUM (Mixed Use) 3.5 acres with Max. FAR of .5 76230 sq. ft. 3273 12959 7623 N/A N/A

Current FLUM (Agriculture & Timberlands ) 5.07 acres with

35% Max. Lot coverage 77297 sq. ft. 2789 13141 7730 N/A N/A

NET CHANGE: -41534 sq. ft. -15 -7061 -4153 N/A N/A


nt

ENVIRONMENTAL/CULTURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS

• Topography and Soil Conditions– The proposed FLUM change will not

negatively impact the surrounding topography.

• Floodplains– Any proposed development will comply with

the City’s FEMA approved Floodplain regulation.


nt


• Vegetative Communities– Upland areas exist in sufficient acreage to be

developed without impacting on-site wetlands.

• Protected Species Distribution/Wildlife Utilization – On-site wetlands provide the bulk of habitat

resources. Staff is recommending the on-site wetlands and associated upland buffer be placed in a conservation designation. However, additional assessments will be required for site plan purposes to further verify wildlife utilization.


nt


• Environmental Sensitive Features– Due to the nature of the connection to off-

site wetlands, development of the site will likely not be impacted.

• Groundwater Resource Protection– Due to the site’s development intensity

remaining relatively the same, it is highly unlikely that the land use activities associated with the proposed FLUM change will impact the potable water supply.


nt


• Historical Resources– It cannot be concluded at this time that

historical resources exist on the subject property due to lack of reference material and on-site investigations; however, existing regulations exist to protect against impact to historical resources during development.


nt

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS• North-Animal

Boarding

• West-Vacant

• South-Vacant

• East-Single-family residential


nt

LAND USE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS

• North-Mixed Use• West- Ag. &

Timberlands• South-Mixed Use &

Ag. & Timberlands• East-Residential


nt

CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES

• Policy 1.1.1.1 (B) – Institutional – This FLUM designation identifies areas for public and private educational uses, public buildings, offices limited to supporting institutional uses, hospitals, civic uses, churches and religious venues, public safety, service and social clubs …


nt

CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES

• Policy 1.1.1.1 (F.) – Conservation – This FLUM provides for preservation of large interconnected wetland systems and other environmentally sensitive areas…


nt

CONSISTENCY WITH REZONING CRITERIA1. Whether it is consistent with all adopted elements of the

Comprehensive Plan.– Staff Finding: Staff finds the proposed rezoning consistent with the

Comprehensive Plan.

2. Its impact upon the environment or natural resources. – Staff Finding: Environmental impact will depend upon the

development program for the church. Factors that affect the development program and subsequently the environmental features found on the property include but are not limited to the amount of required fill material, based upon the development program, avoidance of encroachment into the floodplain and the timing of water and sewer services to the site.

– Staff is recommending that a 2.0 acre wetland along with the designated upland buffer found be assigned a FLUM designation of “Conservation”. The compatible zoning district with “Conservation” is “Preservation.”


nt

CONSISTENCY WITH REZONING CRITERIA3.Its impact on the economy of any affected area.

– Staff Finding: No impact.

4.Notwithstanding any provisions of the land development regulations, its impact upon necessary governmental services such as schools, sewage disposal, potable water, drainage, fire and police protection, solid waste, or transportation systems. – Staff Finding: The proposed rezoning will not negatively impact

the available public infrastructure or services.


nt

CONSISTENCY WITH REZONING CRITERIA5. Any changes in circumstances or

conditions affecting the area. – Staff Finding: Voluntary annexations results in

changed circumstance requiring the City to designate the parcel in accordance with the City’s land development criteria.

6. Any mistakes in the original classification. – Staff Finding: There were no mistakes made in the

original classification.


nt

CONSISTENCY WITH REZONING CRITERIA• 7. Its effect upon the use or value

of the affected area. – Staff Finding: The rezoning allows the City to

plan for the future of this and the surrounding area.

• 8. Its impact upon the public health, welfare, safety, or morals. – Staff Finding: No impacts.


nt

FINDINGS• The proposed FLUM amendment is

generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.


nt

RECOMMENDATION-FLUM AMENDMENT• Staff recommends the approval of the

proposed FLUM amendment from A&T and Mixed Use to Institutional.

• Staff recommends that the 2.0 acre wetland and associated upland buffer found along the western border of the parcel be designated Conservation


nt

RECOMMENDATION-FLUM AMENDMENT


nt

RECOMMENDATION-REZONING• Staff recommends the approval of the

proposed zoning map amendment from COM-3 and Agriculture to Public/Semipublic Use.

• Staff recommends that the 2.0 acre wetland and associated upland buffer found along the western border of the parcel be designated as Preservation.


nt

RECOMMENDATION-REZONING

Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN-08-01 & RZ-OTH-08-08.

Documents

Transcript of Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN-08-01 & RZ-OTH-08-08.