Communicating = telling a compelling story
description
Transcript of Communicating = telling a compelling story
Communicating = telling a compelling story
• Sometimes to an overwhelmed, overworked, uninvested audience
understand and pitch to your audience• Writing
• Abstracts• Papers• Grants
• Talks• Abstracts• Invited presentations• A job talk
The KISS convention
Not that KISS convention
Keep It Simple, Stupid
Abstracts and papers
• Keep on message: what are you asking, how did you address it, what happened when you did what you said you would do, what do you conclude
• You do not need or want to review the entire world literature
• Writing an abstract: analogies to crossword puzzles. • Abstracts:
• Avoid too many abbreviations; if you must abbreviate, avoid abbreviations in the conclusions.
• State a specific conclusion.
Presentations/job talk
• Know the audience. • Start where they are comfortable: a clinical
vignette, a simple cartoon…• Make the broad question you are addressing clear
at the beginning, and throughout (e.g. repeat slides/flow diagram)
• Leave the last bit for future tense, exciting new data …Where are you going, why is it important, you can do it.
Rule #1
A high junk:data ratio
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Better
0
2
4
6
0 2 4 6
Another example of chart junk, in my opinion
The PowerPoint default
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
EastWestNorth
The PowerPoint default minus the chart junk
0
25
50
75
100
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
EastWestNorth
Patterns and red don’t work on a blue background
0
25
50
75
100
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
EastWestNorth
How much data is there anyway?
0
25
50
75
100
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
East
West
North
How much data is are there anyway?
0
25
50
75
100
1 2 3 4
North
WestEast
quarter
7% of US males are color blind. Another reason to avoid red on blue
0 mV
-90 mV
stimulate
0
1 2
34
cell
bath
amplifier records voltage difference between the tips of the two glass microelectrodes
Use the features of PowerPoint
Use the features of PowerPoint
0 mV
-90 mV
stimulate
0
1 2
34
cell
bath
amplifier records voltage difference between the tips of the two glass microelectrodes
Grant-writing: scientific focus
• State a specific over-arching hypothesis and Specific Aims that are testable and important
• Stay away from the trivial• Balance between the do-able and the overly
ambitious• Focus on the problem, not the method
• Not: “we will use a newly-developed mouse to test this idea” but “we will test this idea. One approach is to use a newly-developed mouse…”
• Pick an important problem = advice for your scientific life
Pretty good, huh? And not a single lesson….
Quiz #1
Calypso receiving Telemachus and Mentor in the GrottoWILLIAM HAMILTON RA1751 – 1801
MENTOR: in Greek mythology, friend of Odysseus and tutor of Telemachus. On several occasions in the Odyssey, Athena assumes Mentor’s form to give advice to Telemachus or Odysseus. His name is proverbial for a faithful and wise adviser.
MentoringThere is no one who does not need a mentorDon’t re-invent the wheel – it’s been done before
What goes into a grant?• The science:
• Specific aims• Background and significance• Preliminary data• Methods
• Other stuff that might influence a score:• The investigator• The environment
• Stuff that doesn’t usually influence a score:• The budget
Some grant writing do’s and don’ts
• Reviewers are not infinitely patient.• Make your case on page 1• Make it clearly• Make it legibly• Spell-check• Learn to like to write• Finish the first draft weeks ahead of time
• Time for you to re-review (pretend you didn’t write it)• Time for your mentor and other colleagues to review
• Daily (at least!) backups
Grant writing do’s and don’ts
By the time a reviewer gets to a description of what you propose to do, they should already be convinced that
• the problem is important. • Don’t “characterize”, “describe”, etc. Rather, “test hypothesis”,
“identify…”, “determine the role of…”
• Avoid elevator science: A and C go up; B and D go down…
• the experiments are do-able
• you can do them
• Writing the Specific Aims section (to be discussed)
Some other specifics• Background and significance:
• Don’t review everything there is to know; review what is important to your proposal, introduce new methods. Self-citation is OK in moderation here.
• Preliminary data:• They know what you want to do. Convince them you can do it.
• As soon as you think you are going to write a grant, think about what preliminary data you will need. Don’t leave this for later…
• Methods:• My preference: describe the experiments, pitfalls, interpretation
that will address each Specific Aim; put the details in a separate section at the end.
Form issues
• The Figure 1 Strategy• Fonts and figures• Every paragraph should have a header• Timetable:
• At the end of the Methods section• Reviewers will pillory you for not presenting them• They are near-meaningless, in my opinion.
5 sentences describe the preliminary data and the question to be addressed in Specific Aim 1
Same words for the Specific Aim. The details get increasingly clear as the reviewer reads on
A header for each paragraph
VSMC
ACE
ANGIOTENSINOGEN
ANG I
PAI-1
RENIN
ANG II
KININOGEN
BRADYKININ
INACTIVE PEPTIDES
t-PA
KALLIKREIN
ACE REGULATES VASCULAR FIBRINOLYTIC BALANCE
EC
ANG IV ALDOSTERONE
Inconceivable!I don’t think that word means what you think it means
A picture is worth more than a thousand words…it’s worth hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars
0
2
4
6
8
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36
time
concentration
0
2
4
6
8
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36
time
concentration
A visual issue in graphics generation
A visual issue in graphics generation
0
4
8
0 8 16 24 32
time
con
cen
trat
ion
0
4
8
0 8 16 24 32
time
con
cen
trat
ion
I have a bad feeling about this
The review process
• Imperfect
• Usually impersonal
• Participate on grant review committees if the opportunity arises
• Find out who will review your grant. Cite them (moderately) in the text.
Leave the gun; bring the cannoli
A bad attitude to the review process
NIH Review Criteria
• Significance• Approach• Innovation• Environment• Investigator
• Importance of each component varies during career development
You hear that Mr. Anderson? That is the sound of inevitability….
An unfunded grant is a re-submittable grantAlso, thanks to the miracles of modern word-processing, a written grant need not be submitted to only one funding agency.
Budgets 101
• PI• The concept of % effort
• Other faculty
• Support personnel• 1-2.5 technical people per PI/grant
• Rule of thumb: <70% of year 1 effort to personnel
Budgets 101
• Equipment
• Supplies: • $1000/month/pair of hands• Mice cost a lot
• “Other”: e.g. travel, service contracts
Budgets 101
• What is an indirect cost?• Who actually gets the grant?• What happens if you move?• Modular budgeting• Departmental sign-off• Why those guys in Grants and Contracts are your
friends• A good paradox: Agencies fund science, NOT
your Specific Aims
The tensions of academic life
• Salary issues• Will I get funded next time round?• My mentor isn’t giving me good advice• My mentor isn’t letting me become independent• My mentor is letting me become too independent• I am independent, but no one outside my
university knows it• My spouse hates me and my kids don’t know me
It's not spaghetti, it's linguiniNow it's garbage.
Throw enough linguini against the wall, and some of it will stick