Communicating in a crisis - Resilience Guard€¦ · Communicating in a crisis When developing...

2
Communicating in a crisis When developing crisis management plans, one of the most important elements is how to commu- nicate during an incident. Whatever procedures you have set up – telephone trees, automated systems or pre-recorded announcements on an incident line – your plans should include a method of two-way communication, allowing employees to confirm they are safe. As an organisation you firstly need to be able to speedily alert employees to an incident – such as an armed robbery at a branch, failure of the company’s computer network or a fire at head office - and, secondly, keep them updated on developments so they are not forced to rely on external sources like the internet or TV news. But your employees are only one of the audiences who need to be considered. You also need to communicate with customers, proactively informing them of the situation so they don’t hear the news second hand and allaying their concerns about your ability to provide goods or services. Then there are your key suppliers, any partners and other stake- holders who must be informed of any incident and its probable impact. As well as establishing clear crisis communication procedures, organisations should consider the way they plan to communicate to prevent negative public perception of the company’s response, which can lead to untold reputational damage. For example, in what must surely rank as one of the most public communications gaffes in recent times, Tony Hayward, chief executive of BP at the time of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill that killed 11 workers, notoriously remarked, “I’d like my life back.” TM

Transcript of Communicating in a crisis - Resilience Guard€¦ · Communicating in a crisis When developing...

Page 1: Communicating in a crisis - Resilience Guard€¦ · Communicating in a crisis When developing crisis management plans, one of the most important elements is how to commu-nicate during

Communicating in a crisis

When developing crisis management plans, one of the most important elements is how to commu-nicate during an incident. Whatever procedures you have set up – telephone trees, automated systems or pre-recorded announcements on an incident line – your plans should include a method of two-way communication, allowing employees to confirm they are safe.

As an organisation you firstly need to be able to speedily alert

employees to an incident – such as an armed robbery at a branch,

failure of the company’s computer network or a fire at head office -

and, secondly, keep them updated on developments so they are

not forced to rely on external sources like the internet or TV news.

But your employees are only one of the audiences who need to be

considered. You also need to communicate with customers,

proactively informing them of the situation so they don’t hear the

news second hand and allaying their concerns about your ability to

provide goods or services.

Then there are your key suppliers, any partners and other stake-

holders who must be informed of any incident and its probable

impact.

As well as establishing clear crisis communication procedures,

organisations should consider the way they plan to communicate to

prevent negative public perception of the company’s response,

which can lead to untold reputational damage. For example, in what

must surely rank as one of the most public communications gaffes

in recent times, Tony Hayward, chief executive of BP at the time of

the Deepwater Horizon oil spill that killed 11 workers, notoriously

remarked, “I’d like my life back.”

One mistake many firms unwittingly make is to task their

lawyer with being the company spokesperson during a crisis

precisely because they are scared of making a hash of

things. This can backfire badly, particularly in situations that

involve loss of life, giving the impression that the company is

defensive, has something to hide and is more concerned

about the possibility of legal action than the welfare of its

employees.

So think carefully about who will be responsible for dealing

with the media, concerned employees and grieving relatives

and how your message will come across. Some companies

mistakenly assume that just because their senior executives

have reached the positions they have that they will instinc-

tively be good communicators but this is by no means

always the case. Seriously consider media training for those

who might be tasked with communicating in a crisis. Your

nominated spokespeople need to rehearse so they do not

have to learn how to respond to sometimes hostile question-

ing for the first time in a real-life crisis.

AirAsia chief executive Tony Fernandes got it absolutely right

as the story of the disappearance of flight QZ8501 to

Indonesia unfolded. Instead of being pictured on TV news in

a plush executive office (ivory tower) he was recorded at the

airport in Surbaya among the throng of desperately worried

relatives of the 155 passengers on board.

Wearing an ID card on a lanyard around his neck (just like his

employees) and clearly speaking from the heart, rather than

a pre-prepared press statement, he said, “We are very

devastated by what's happened, it's unbelievable. Our

concern right now is for the relatives and for the next of kin -

there is nothing more important to us, for our crew's family,

and for the passengers' families.”

Later tweeting, "This is my worst nightmare," all his actions

showed that he and his employees were part of one big

family and that they and the passengers’ relatives were ‘all in

it together’.

Demonstrating both preparedness and compassion, AirAsia

responded promptly to the terrible tragedy, mobilising a

support team to help take care of relatives' immediate

needs, including accommodation and travel arrangements.

Contrast this corporate behaviour with that of BP’s Tony

Hayward, who was vilified for a series of ill-timed comments

including the claim that the largest marine oil spill in history, a

tragedy for both the workers killed and sea life affected, was

“relatively tiny” compared with the “very big ocean”. Should

your business be caught up in a disaster, which company’s

approach would you prefer to emulate?

TM

Page 2: Communicating in a crisis - Resilience Guard€¦ · Communicating in a crisis When developing crisis management plans, one of the most important elements is how to commu-nicate during

Resilience Guard GmbH, Zürcherstrasse 37d, CH-8852, Altendorf, Switzerland

T +41 79 2525007, E [email protected]

When developing crisis management plans, one of the most important elements is how to commu-nicate during an incident. Whatever procedures you have set up – telephone trees, automated systems or pre-recorded announcements on an incident line – your plans should include a method of two-way communication, allowing employees to confirm they are safe.

As an organisation you firstly need to be able to speedily alert

employees to an incident – such as an armed robbery at a branch,

failure of the company’s computer network or a fire at head office -

and, secondly, keep them updated on developments so they are

not forced to rely on external sources like the internet or TV news.

But your employees are only one of the audiences who need to be

considered. You also need to communicate with customers,

proactively informing them of the situation so they don’t hear the

news second hand and allaying their concerns about your ability to

provide goods or services.

Then there are your key suppliers, any partners and other stake-

holders who must be informed of any incident and its probable

impact.

As well as establishing clear crisis communication procedures,

organisations should consider the way they plan to communicate to

prevent negative public perception of the company’s response,

which can lead to untold reputational damage. For example, in what

must surely rank as one of the most public communications gaffes

in recent times, Tony Hayward, chief executive of BP at the time of

the Deepwater Horizon oil spill that killed 11 workers, notoriously

remarked, “I’d like my life back.”

www.resilienceguard.ch

One mistake many firms unwittingly make is to task their

lawyer with being the company spokesperson during a crisis

precisely because they are scared of making a hash of

things. This can backfire badly, particularly in situations that

involve loss of life, giving the impression that the company is

defensive, has something to hide and is more concerned

about the possibility of legal action than the welfare of its

employees.

So think carefully about who will be responsible for dealing

with the media, concerned employees and grieving relatives

and how your message will come across. Some companies

mistakenly assume that just because their senior executives

have reached the positions they have that they will instinc-

tively be good communicators but this is by no means

always the case. Seriously consider media training for those

who might be tasked with communicating in a crisis. Your

nominated spokespeople need to rehearse so they do not

have to learn how to respond to sometimes hostile question-

ing for the first time in a real-life crisis.

AirAsia chief executive Tony Fernandes got it absolutely right

as the story of the disappearance of flight QZ8501 to

Indonesia unfolded. Instead of being pictured on TV news in

a plush executive office (ivory tower) he was recorded at the

airport in Surbaya among the throng of desperately worried

relatives of the 155 passengers on board.

Wearing an ID card on a lanyard around his neck (just like his

employees) and clearly speaking from the heart, rather than

a pre-prepared press statement, he said, “We are very

devastated by what's happened, it's unbelievable. Our

concern right now is for the relatives and for the next of kin -

there is nothing more important to us, for our crew's family,

and for the passengers' families.”

Later tweeting, "This is my worst nightmare," all his actions

showed that he and his employees were part of one big

family and that they and the passengers’ relatives were ‘all in

it together’.

Demonstrating both preparedness and compassion, AirAsia

responded promptly to the terrible tragedy, mobilising a

support team to help take care of relatives' immediate

needs, including accommodation and travel arrangements.

Contrast this corporate behaviour with that of BP’s Tony

Hayward, who was vilified for a series of ill-timed comments

including the claim that the largest marine oil spill in history, a

tragedy for both the workers killed and sea life affected, was

“relatively tiny” compared with the “very big ocean”. Should

your business be caught up in a disaster, which company’s

approach would you prefer to emulate?

About the authorJohn Zeppos FBCI is managing parter of Resilience Guard

GmbH based in Zurich, Switzerland.

[email protected]

www.resilienceguard.ch

TM