Common Types of Structural Systems in Tall Buildings

download Common Types of Structural Systems in Tall Buildings

of 3

Transcript of Common Types of Structural Systems in Tall Buildings

  • 7/23/2019 Common Types of Structural Systems in Tall Buildings

    1/3

    COMMON TYPES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS IN TALL BUILDINGS Moment resisting frame system

    Braced frame system Shear wall system Advanced structural forms- tubular systems 2.1 RIGID

    FRAMES It is a system that utilizes the moment resisting connection between the columns and beams

    throughout its perimeter to resist lateral loads applied. It may be used to provide lateral load resistance

    for low rise buildings. Generally its less stiff than other systems. This is also known as sway frames or

    moment frames. 2.2 BRACED FRAME To resist lateral deflections, the simplest method from theoretical

    standpoint is intersection of full diagonal bracing or X bracing. It works well for 20 to 60 storey height but

    does not give room for opening such as door and windows. To provide more flexibility for placing of doors

    and windows, K bracing system is preferred. If we need to provide larger openings, we can use full storey

    knee bracing system. It is found to be efficient in energy dissipation during earthquake loads by forming

    plastic hinges in beam at the point of intersection of bracings with the beams. 2.3 SHEAR WALLS The

    lateral loads are assumed to be concentrated at floor levels. The rigid floors spread these forces to the

    columns or walls in the building. Specially designed reinforced concrete walls parallel to directions of load

    are used to resist a large part of the lateral loads caused by winds or earthquakes by acting as deep

    cantilever beams fixed at foundation. These elements are called shear walls. They extend over the full

    length of the building. Frequently, buildings have interior concrete core walls around the elevator, stair

    and service wells. Such walls may be considered as shear walls. The above systems discussed are not

    efficient for building greater than 60 storeys 2.4 ADVANCED STRUCTURAL FORMS They are: Framed

    tube structure (a) Braced tube structure (b) Tube in tube structure (c) Bundled tube structures (d) (d)

    3. TUBE Tube is a system where in order to resist lateral loads (wind, seismic etc.) a building is designed

    to act like a hollow cylinder cantilevered perpendicular to ground. This system was first introduced by

    Fazlur Rahman Khan. The first example of a tubes use is 43-storey khan designed Dewitt-chestnut

    apartment building in Chicago. Fazlur Khan defined a framed tube structure as a 3 dimensional space

    structure composed of 3,4 or possibly more frames, braced frames or shear walls joined at or near their

    edges to form a vertical tube like structural system capable of resisting lateral forces in any direction by

    cantilevering from the foundation This laid the foundation for tube structural design of many later

    skyscrapers including John Hancock Centre, Wilis tower, W.T.C, Petronas tower 3.1 CONCEPT OF

    TUBULAR SYSTEM The main idea of tubular system is to arrange the structural elements so that the

    system can resist the loads imposed on the structure efficiently particularly the horizontal loads. In this

    arrangement several elements contribute to the system i.e. slabs, beams, girders, columns. Unlike mostoften, the walls and cores are used to resist the horizontal loads, in tubular system the horizontal loads are

    resisted by column and spandrel beams at the perimeter of the tubes. Many tall buildings have adopted

    this system and the very first building designed using tubular concept was sears tower. The exterior

    framing is designed sufficiently strong to resist all lateral loads on the building, thereby allowing the

    interior of the building to be simply framed for gravity loads. Interior columns are comparatively few and

    located at the core. The distance between the interior and the exterior is spanned with beams or trusses

    and intentionally left column free. This maximizes the effectiveness of the perimeter tube by transferring

    some of the gravity loads within the structure to it and increases its ability to resist overturning due to

    lateral loads. Tubular structure is a structure with closed column space between two to four metres and

    joined by deep spandrel beam at the floor level Group of columns perpendicular to the direction of

    horizontal load is called flanged frame and group of columns parallel to the direction of horizontal load is

    called web frames. Since the columns are close to each other and the spandrel beams are deep, thestructure can be considered as perforated tube and behaves as cantilevered tube. The flanged frame

    columns will resist the axial forces (tension and compression) and web will resist the shear forces. Taking

    a pure rectangular tube, as shown in figure 1. The thickness of the wall is t, the length of tube is b and

    width is d. The contribution of flanged frame and web to resist the horizontal load for pure rectangular

    tube can be obtained by calculating exact moment of inertia as When MI of flanges about their own axis is

    neglected, the MI of tube becomes For square tube, b=d, then the section modulus becomes Stress at

    extreme fiber where M is the overturning moment at the floor level and d is the between the two extreme

  • 7/23/2019 Common Types of Structural Systems in Tall Buildings

    2/3

    fibers Portion of overturning moment carried by flange Portion of overturning moment carried by web

    Therefore, it is obvious that the largest portion of overturning moment is carried by flanges i.e. 75% of M

    and the remaining 25% by webs. This is due to the fact that Z of the square tube is a function of the square

    of the distance between the extreme fiber and width of high rise buildings is usually large. Hence, tubular

    system is an efficient system to resist horizontal loads. 4. FRAMED TUBE STRUCTURES Frames consist

    of closely spaced columns, 2 to 4 m between centers joined by deep girders. The idea is to create a tube

    that will act like a continuous perforated chimney or stack. The lateral resistance of framed tube structureis provided by stiff moment resisting frames that form a tube around the perimeter of the building. The

    gravity loading is shared between tube and the interior columns. This structural form offers an efficient,

    easily constructed structure appropriate for buildings having 40 to 100 storeys. W.T.C When lateral loads

    act, the perimeter frames aligned in the direction of loads acts as the webs of massive tube cantilever and

    those normal to the direction of the loading act as the flanges. Even though framed tube is a structurally

    efficient form, flange frames tend to suffer from shear lag. This results in the mid face flange columns

    being less stressed than the corner columns and therefore not contributing to their full potential lateral

    strength. Aesthetically the tube looks like the grid like faade as small windowed and is repetitious and

    hence use of fabrication in steel makes construction faster. E.g.: Aon Centre and W.T.C towers 5. BRACED

    TUBE STRUCTURES Further improvement of tubular structure can be made by cross bracings the frame

    with X-bracings over many storeys. As the diagonals of the braced tube are connected to the column at

    each intersection, they virtually eliminate the effects of shear lag in both flange and web frames. As a

    result, the structure behaves under lateral loads more like a braced frame reducing bending in the

    members of the frame. JOHN HANCOCK BUILDING Hence spacings of columns can be increased and

    the depth of girders will be less, thereby allowing large size windows than in conventional framed tube

    structures. In braced tube structures, the braces transfer axial load from more highly stressed columns to

    less highly stressed columns and eliminates difference between load stresses in columns. E.g.: Chicagos

    John Hancock building, The Citigroup Center, Bank of China Tower 6. TUBE IN TUBE STRUCTURES

    This is a type of framed tube consisting of an outer-framed tube together with an internal elevator and

    service core. The inner tube may consist of braced frames. The outer and the inner tubes act jointly in

    resisting both gravity and lateral loading in steel framed buildings. However, outer tube usually plays a

    dominant role because of its much greater structural depth. This type of structures is also as hull and core

    structures. 7. BUNDLED TUBE The bundled tube system can be visualized as an assemblage of individualtubes resulting in multiple cell tube. System allows for greatest height and most floor area. E.g.: Sears

    Tower In this system, introduction of internal webs greatly reduces the shear lag in the flanges. Hence

    their columns are more evenly stressed than in the single tube structures and their contribution to the

    lateral stiffness is greater. SEARS TOWER 8. ADVANTAGES OF TUBULAR SYSTEMS IN TALL

    BUILDINGS Offers some clear advantage from materials standpoint. Designed well, tubular forms have

    been known to utilize the same amount of material as would have been employed for a structure that is

    half as large or framed conventionally. Allows greater flexibility in planning of interior space since all the

    columns and lateral system is concentrated on the perimeter of structure. This allows a column free space

    in the interior Regularity in the column schedule allows off-site fabrication and welding where speed can

    be achieved while still confronting to quality Wind resisting system since located on the perimeterof the

    building meant that maximum advantage is taken of the total width of the building to resist overturning

    moment Identical framing for all floors because floor members are not subjected to varying internalforces due to lateral loads 9. CRITICISM TO TUBULAR STRUCTURAL FORMS While it allows high rise

    construction with greater efficiency, it significantly reduces the size of the opening in the building. So

    while occupants are working or living at greater heights, their view of world outside is rather obstructed.

    The finite rigidity of the girders and the connections also lead to a deviation from the standard linear

    distribution of axial forces across the flange and web columns assumed in beam theory. This non linearity

    in axial force distribution is known as shear lag and is an effect that has to be accounted for in the design

    of tubular structures since it has an effect on overall lateral stiffness of the structure. 10. SHEAR LAG

  • 7/23/2019 Common Types of Structural Systems in Tall Buildings

    3/3

    EFFECT In actual tubular structure, the distribution of axial forces along the flanged frame columns at

    one floor is not uniform and the distribution of shear forces along the web is not linear. This is mainly due

    to the flexibility of the tubular structures and is called shear lag effect Along the flanges, this non linearity

    can result in the corner or exterior columns experiencing greater stress than the center or interior

    columns. This is known as positive shear lag. However negative shear lag has been discovered to exist and

    this is opposite of positive shear lag and the corners are less stressed than the center columns. This

    deviation from traditional beam bending behaviour naturally has implications on bending stiffness of thebuilt up structure. The presence of shear lag thus prevents the full potential in terms of rigidity of the

    structure to be adopted. In order to qualify the magnitude and presence of shear lag, two measures have

    generally been used Involves the ratio of slopes of the stress distributions with and without shear lag for

    web panels Ratio of stressbetween the corner and the center column for flange panels. In either case, as

    the ratio gets to unity, shear lag ceases to exist. 11. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Strength of tubular form

    arises from the utilization of the entire building perimeter to resist lateral loads. The goal is for the entire

    perimeter to function compositely and behave as a large cantilever beam anchored rigidly into the ground.

    In order to achieve this composite behavior, columns are closely spaced with deep spandrel beams

    connecting them. However due to the thinness of the tube wall and finite rigidity of spandrel beams, the

    assumption of classical beam bending are violated and structure cannot be accurately analyzed as pure

    cantilever beam bending beam. Two assumptions in traditional bending theory which are violated by the

    structural behavior of tubular structures are 1) Plane section remaining plane 2) Linear stress distribution

    in web Under lateral loading, plane sections do not remain plane due to differential elongation of columns

    along the flange which result from local deformation of connecting spandrels. This leads to non-linear

    axial stress distribution in both flange and web panel which is called shear lag. Side view of axial

    deformation of flange of frames causing shear lag effect Another reason why tubular structure cannot be

    readily analyzed as a cantilever beam is the occurrence of shear deformation. The finite rigidity of

    columns and spandrel beams give the structure a finite shear rigidity that allows shear deformation to

    occur. This shear mode of deformation is ignored in classical bending theory. Hence analysis of tube

    structures is based on 3 dimensional analysis using finite element. 12. CONCLUSION 1. The tubular

    systems are one of the most effective way of construction of high rise buildings 2. They are extensively

    used in the construction nowadays 3. The Burj Khalifa, which is the tallest building uses the bundled tube

    design concept