Comments on Progressive Taxation conference on ... · 10/18/2019 · “Facts” about wealth...
Transcript of Comments on Progressive Taxation conference on ... · 10/18/2019 · “Facts” about wealth...
Comments on Progressive Taxation conference on “Rethinking InequalityPolicies”
1/22
Wojciech Kopczuk Columbia University
Peterson Institute for International Economics October 2019
“Facts” about wealth inequality — Saez-Zucman (2019)
(a) Top 0.1% wealth share
5%
0%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1913
1918
1923
1928
1933
1938
1943
1948
1953
1958
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
2003
2008
2013
ltiplierEsta (adju
te mu sted)
SCF+Forbes 400
Capitalization
Revised capitalization
2/22
“Facts” about wealth inequality —Smith-Zidar-Zwick (2019)
A. Top 0.1% Share of Total Wealth
510
1520
25S
hare
of T
otal
Hou
seho
ld W
ealth
(%)
1915 1925 1935 1995 2005 20151945 1955 1965 1975 1985
Baseline Saez and Zucman (2016)Estate tax data (Kopczuk and Saez, 2004) Our Preferred EstimateRaw SCFRaw SCF + Forbes 400
3/22
“Facts” about income inequality
0%4/22
5%
10%
15%
20%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Auten-Splinter
PSZ
PSZ vs AS — imputations, things we do notknow
5/22
Table 4: Decomposition of top one percent income shares by approaches
Auten-Splinter approach PSZ approach Percentage point Percentage point
1962 1979 2014 1979–2014 1962–2014
Pre-tax incomeUnderreported income by IRS audit data Underreported income by positive income 0.1 1.0 2.2 1.2 2.1Include distributed & other retirement income PSZ private retirement distribution 0.3 0.2 1.3 1.1 1.1Non-retirement pre-tax corporate income PSZ non-retirement pre-tax corp. income 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.2Other taxes by disposable income less savings Other taxes by factor income less savings 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.3Various corrections to tax income definition Use uncorrected tax return market income -0.1 -0.1 0.4 0.6 0.5Imputed rent by property tax deductions Imputed rent by housing wealth estimates 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 -0.2Limit returns to adult residents No adjustment -0.1 0.2 0.2 -0.1 0.3Groups by individuals/size-adjusted incomes Groups by adults/equal-split married inc. -0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4Non-profits/govt. income half per capita Non-profits/govt. income all by income * * 0.1 * *Social insurance benefits/deficit excluded Social insur. ben./def. incl., taxes deducted 0.2 * -0.1 -0.1 -0.2Federal Reserve payments by mortgage interest Fed. Res. payments by income * * 0.1 0.1 0.1Inflation correction No correction * -0.5 -0.1 0.5 *
Pre-tax differences (PSZ less AS) & totals 1.6 1.7 5.9 4.3 4.4
After-tax incomeGovt. consumption allocated half per capita Govt. consumption all by after-tax income 0.8 0.7 1.2 0.5 0.4Non-SS deficits by federal income taxes Half by government transfers, half taxes -0.2 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.7Government transfers as described in text PSZ transfers distribution -0.3 -0.2 * 0.2 0.3Estate tax by prior decade decedent income Estate tax by wealth distribution * * * * *Corporate taxes by wages and corp. ownership Corporate taxes by capital ownership -0.2 -0.3 -0.3 * -0.1Other taxes by disposable income less savings Other taxes by factor income less savings -0.2 -0.1 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1After-tax differences (PSZ less AS) & totals 0.2 0.3 1.1 0.8 0.9
level difference difference in changes
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
6/22
International comparisons — data problems in Norway(!), Alstadsæter et al. (2019)
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Shar
e of
tota
l inc
ome
accr
uing
to to
p1%
● ● ● ● ●
●● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● Overall Income before Capital Gains and Dividends,ICOverall Income with Dividends before Capital Gains, IB
0.002000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 7/22
BOverall Income with Dividends and Capital Gains, ICG
International comparisons — data problems in Norway(!), Alstadsæter et al. (2019)
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Shar
e of
tota
l inc
ome
accr
uing
to to
p1%
● ● ● ● ●
●● ● ● ● ● ● ●
● Overall Income before Capital Gains and Dividends,ICOverall Income with Dividends before Capital Gains, IB
0.002000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 8/22
Overall Income with Dividends and Capital Gains, ICGB
Overall Income with Retained Earnings before Capital Gains, ID
International comparisons — data problems in Norway(!), Alstadsæter et al. (2019)
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Shar
e of
tota
l inc
ome
accr
uing
to to
p1%
●
●
●●
●
●
●● ● ● ● ● ●
● Overall Income with Dividends before Capital Gains,IBOverall Income, Imputed Based on DividendsOverall Income with Retained Earnings before Capital Gains, ID
0.002000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 9/22
Revenue (%GDP) — VAT andexcise%
GD
P
10
20
30
40
Revenue: 25.9%
Revenue: 32.7%
Revenue: 34.0%
4.4% 6.8%
Highest VAT revenue: Denmark 9.4%New Zealand 9.4%Hungary 9.3%Sweden 9.2%Finland 9.1%
Specific/excise VAT Sales All other sources
0United States Canada OECD − Average
10/22
Revenue (%GDP) — income and corporatetax
10
20
30
40
All consumption Corporate Income All other sources
0United States Canada OECD − Average
11/22
Revenue (%GDP) — Social Security and payroll taxes
10
20
30
40
Consumption+Income+Corporate
0United States Canada OECD − Average
12/22
Social Security/payroll All other sources
Revenue (%GDP) — estate/gift and wealth taxes
10
20
30
40
All other sources Wealth Estate, gift, inheritance
0United States Canada OECD − Average
13/22
Incidence changes
14/22
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
15/22
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
16/22
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
17/22
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
18/22
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
19/22
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
20/22
“Facts” about progressivity — SZ (2019) vs PSZ (2018)
21/22