Comm2 Tb Arp

4
TB_PP_Family name | 1 Comm 2 – Prof. Miren Morales Tentative Bibliography for ARGUMENTATIVE RESEARCH PAPER Section: ____________ Name: ______________________________________________________ Score: _________________ Degree: ________________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Reminder: You should ONLY do this tentative bibliography (TB) AFTER you have already done your preliminary research and have acquired enough sources to choose a solid topic. A. I decided to work on the ISSUE on: Example: Bilingual Language Education _______________________________________________________________________ B. My tentative ARGUMENTATIVE TOPIC is: Example: 1) (Con) All English policy in English subject classroom interaction versus (Pro) allowing mother-tongue based language education, code-switching, and code mixing. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ 2) Claim (stand on the issue): I am for Pro-stand ______________________________________________________________________________ _______________ ______________________________________________________________________________ _______________ C. The contextual focus of my paper is written below (research based): {my example only} 1. Audience: Filipino bilingual or multilingual students ______________________________________________________________________________ _______________ Age Bracket: General Public ______________________________________________________________________________ _______________ Philosophy: Mother-tongue based education

description

From Professor Miren M. Morales

Transcript of Comm2 Tb Arp

TB_PP_Family name | 1

Comm 2 Prof. Miren Morales

Tentative Bibliography for ARGUMENTATIVE RESEARCH PAPERSection: ____________

Name: ______________________________________________________ Score: _________________

Degree: ________________________________________________ Date: _______________________

Reminder: You should ONLY do this tentative bibliography (TB) AFTER you have already done your preliminary research and have acquired enough sources to choose a solid topic.

A. I decided to work on the ISSUE on:

Example: Bilingual Language Education

_______________________________________________________________________

B. My tentative ARGUMENTATIVE TOPIC is: Example:1) (Con) All English policy in English subject classroom interaction versus (Pro) allowing mother-tongue based language education, code-switching, and code mixing. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2) Claim (stand on the issue): I am for Pro-stand_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

C. The contextual focus of my paper is written below (research based): {my example only}1. Audience: Filipino bilingual or multilingual students

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Age Bracket: General Public_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Philosophy: Mother-tongue based education

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Scope: Basic Education in Public Schools only outside Metro Manila

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Context: The social relevance of my paper is to assist the underprivileged population in the remote areas which are at risk in terms of access to literacy and resources towards a more effective language education that is more scientific and more ethical and culturally sensitive and at the same time viable._______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

3. Purpose:I want to show based on empirical researches and actual classroom practices from documented testimonies that the traditional code-mixing and code-switching which was viewed as negative phenomena in English language teaching is in fact not detrimental to English language proficiency but may be used as a scaffold for faster target language acquisition and that this traditional negative view is decontextualized analysis at best and politically motivated at worst from monolingual language speakers viewpoint. I will show that the advantages of pro outweight the disadvantages given by the con-side.____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________4. Other contextual considerations (oriented by your chosen topic): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ etc.D. The following are combinations of key words that I use to search online materials and online library catalogues to find relevant articles and books:

1. _______________________________________________________________

2. _______________________________________________________________

3. _______________________________________________________________

4. _______________________________________________________________

5. _______________________________________________________________

E. I have checked both land library and online library resources, and I found the following resources:Minimum of 7 sources for Pro:

List the arguments and evidences supporting the pro-side:Complete Bibliographic Citation using correct APA style format for documentation:

(Add the name of the library and Call Number for print, non-e sources.)Type of SourceArguments and evidences supporting the pro-side:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Minimum of 4 sources for Con:

List the arguments and evidences supporting the con-side:

Complete Bibliographic Citation using correct APA style format for documentation:

(Add the name of the library and Call Number for print, non-e sources.)Type of SourceArguments and evidences supporting the pro-side:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Position Paper Tentative Planning Outline:

N.B. 1

You should use a tradtional outline. You have two options each aspect: 2-level or 3-level, whichever is more appropriate) Topic or sentence outline. The tentative planning outline is not final (for the final outline attached to your Position Paper, you may use decimal coding outline)

N.B. 3

You are encouraged to go beyond the minimum number of sources.

Do NOT choose the example topic otherwise ALL of you would have the same topic; besides, that is MY position paper.

If you have any questions about this requirement and other matters related to the final paper, DONT go to each other, rather ASK ME via text or personal appointment (do not email me unless you TEXT 1st)

* Deadline for submission is March 18 (MTh classes) and 19 (TF classes), 2013.