Comcast Proprietary and Confidential Next Gen Access Architecture July, 2011 CCAP (CMAP) Program at...
-
Upload
preston-rho -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Comcast Proprietary and Confidential Next Gen Access Architecture July, 2011 CCAP (CMAP) Program at...
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Next Gen Access Architecture
July, 2011
CCAP (CMAP) Program at Comcast
SCTE 2011
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Why would MSOs need CCAP?• Engineering: Capacity and efficiency, frees significant HE capacity
50% space savings with 4x capacity 60% power savings plus less cooling Improve existing UPS and battery backup performance
• Architecture: Simplicity and flexibility is already a key driver Minimum, simplified combining wiring Full-spectrum, MPEG/DOCSIS QAMs, easier migration to ADS Future proof, single access platform
• Purchasing: Cost will quickly become a big driver CMTS 4-6 DOCSIS channel cost equals CCAP 16 DOCSIS + 16 MPEG Channels !!
• Operations: Reliability and manageability will also drive adoption Fully redundant (N+1 LC & 1+1 Commons) Configuration change between QAM types vs. equipment swap-out Much shorter maintenance window (ISSU) Far less equipment to manage and maintain
2
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Top view of headend rack line-up
Each box represents a rack
Example for illustrative purposes
Top view of headend rack line-up
Each box represents a rack
Example for illustrative purposes
CCAP space efficiency exampleToday’s HE: 16 NC QAMs per SG
Digital Broadcast
VOD
CMTS
Combiner & Amps
Lasers & Receivers
SDV
After CCAP: 64 NC QAMs per SG
NOTES:• Deployment example assuming 40K homes passed, 200 nodes, 140 D3 HSD service groups at 16 SG/chassis,
120 VOD SGs @ 6QAMs/SG and 4 QAMs/RF Port, and same SDV service groups.• Larger or smaller headends would scale accordingly, but savings will be proportional.
1/21/2Space
Space
4x 4x
Capacity
Capacity
3
CCAP eliminates the need for headend expansions
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
CCAP yearly power savings in a typical headend
4
CCAP saves 60% of power, not including cooling energy savings!CCAP saves 60% of power, not including cooling energy savings!
UPS and battery requirements are also reduced – existing capacity UPS and battery requirements are also reduced – existing capacity will last considerably longer when power is interrupted. will last considerably longer when power is interrupted.
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Integrated Integrated CCAPCCAP
CCAP in a nutshellCCAP DS Port AssignmentsCCAP DS Port Assignments
DS RF Port
32/48/64 NC QAMs +
96 BC QAMs
HSD CDV
VODnDVR
SDV
DO
CS
ISM
PE
G T
S
Simplify, and eventually
eliminate RF Combining
AVS
Bro
ad
ca
st
US
DS
Legacy OOB
Narrowcast & Broadcast Digital Services
CCAPAnalog
SplitLegacy OOB
Modular Modular CCAPCCAP
USUS R
edun
danc
yUS US US USDSDS
Red
unda
ncy
DS DS DS DSXR1
XR2
Power Supply
Modules
Primary Switch/Route Engine
12 Ports/DS Card32/48/64 Narrowcast QAMs/Port
96 Broadcast QAMs/Port
Fan Modules
Intake Air
Primary 100-Gig-E Ports
Secondary 100-Gig-E Ports
Exhaust Air
Secondary Switch/Route Engine
24 Ports/US Card(Implemented using
high density UCH w/
MCX-75 connectors)
Front View16U Chassis
Rear View16U Chassis
• Converged Cable Access Platform• Combines the functions of the CMTS and Edge QAM• Implements all narrowcast and broadcast QAMs
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Operational features of CCAP
6
Open decryption/encryption interfaces
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Integrated vs. Modular CCAP components
7
Each approach has pros and cons
HE Router ICCAPI-CCAPSingle CCAP
Vendor
IP
Routing
HE Router / M-CCAP PS ICCAPM-CCAP
ASBest-in-Class
Expertise
PASI
Sub & Flow Management
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
CCAP use cases examples (two of several)
8
Where I-CMTS exists
US
DS
To
day
To
day
Fu
ture
Fu
ture
HE Router
Bc
as
t
VO
D
SD
V
URURI-CMTS
US
HE Router
URI-CCAP
US
DS
HE Router
BC
as
t
VO
D
SD
V
M-CMTS Core
URUEQAM
US DS
HE Router
M-CMTS Core
URM-CCAP ASin DS mode
DS
HE Router / M-CCAP PS
URM-CCAPAS
US
DS
US
HE Router
URURI-CCAP
DS
Add density with CCAP Access Shelf
in DS-only mode
Add density with CCAP Access Shelf
in DS-only mode
Shorter TermShorter Term
Lo
ng
er T
erm
O
pti
on
sL
on
ger
Ter
m
Op
tio
ns • Migrate to
I-CCAP & relocate CCAP-AS
• Or, add CCAP PS
• Existing Router w/PS SW
• Add US LCs
…M-CCAP
For M-CMTS marketsFor M-CMTS markets
Eventually I-CCAP or…
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
CCAP migration options
9
Capacity Augment
New ServiceDeployment
InfrastructureUpgrade
• Drop in CCAP as SGs are split or EQAMs/CMTSs are added
• Keep current equipment and eventually move to other locations
• Add CCAP for new service• Maintain existing equipment
for existing services• Eventually integrate other
services into CCAP
• Add CCAPs for all SGs in key HEs
• Independent of services• Existing equipment relocated
Broadcast and OOB
SDV/VOD EQAMs
CMTSs
Combiner
Lasers and Receivers
Existing SGs New SGs
CCAP
Existing SGs
CCAP for New Service
Broadcast and OOB
SDV/VOD EQAMs
CMTSs
Combiner
Lasers and ReceiversExisting SGs
CCAP
Broadcast and OOB
Combiner
Lasers and Receivers
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Preparing for CCAP
10
• Work underway in the many areas at Comcast: Systems: configuration, monitoring, logging, fault detection, trouble
management, inventory, databases, etc. Operations: changes to deploy and manage single device Testing: process (who/how/when and what order), and edge QAM, DRFI
performance, new features, and new services (RS-DVR, AVS)
• Deployment planning: Network models for system types: very large to very small HEs Trials starting in 2011: operational readiness focus, not equipment
• New combiner equipment: optimized for CCAP and remaining inputs
• Working with Motorola and Cisco on encryption licensing model and ECMG implementation plan
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
• CCAP-like network to understand technical/ops issues and prepare Operational processes, tools, network engineering, etc.
• The trial is about MSO operations, NOT to test equipment
• The scope will be minimal but meaningful (few service groups)
CCAP operational readiness trial – concept diagram
11
DS
US
VOD
SDV
BCAST
OTHER QAMs
6
4
4
4
20-24
DTA2-4
ANALOGTEST
~120
All servicesM-CMTS
Core
M-CCAP ASin DS-only mode
Co
mb
ine
r
Collaborative effort with Cox and Rogers
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Completing CCAP specifications• Large team of industry experts developing CCAP specs
Key engineers and architects from all EQAM and CMTS vendors Agreements with Cablevision, Charter, Cox, LGI/UPC, NCTC, Rogers, and
others, plus working with TWC on common requirements Direct support from CableLabs; now working on CL CCAP Specs Cable Europe Labs representing the 15 largest MSOs in Europe
• MSO specification documents:
Phase 1 completed in March 2010 (focus on HW & Functions)
Phase 2 completed in July 2010 (added Config & Mgmt and PASI)
Phase 3 completed in Nov. 2010 (expanded all specs; wrote CL TR) Phase 4 in progress, adding adv. Functions, ATP and updated CL TR (target
Sept. ’11)
– CableLabs working on CCAP OSSI and PASI specs
– Changed name to converge TWC and Comcast efforts12
Comcast Proprietary and Confidential
Summary and conclusions• CCAP Platform is the Next Gen CMTS and Edge QAM
Natural technology evolution; cost effective, simple and redundant Supports all digital services (VOD, SDV, Broadcast, HSD/voice) Easy migration from MPEG-TS to DOCSIS
• Many MSOs need the CCAP ASAP Operational simplicity and benefits are staggering CCAP QAMs are much more cost effective
• Expect initial trials in 2011 and initial deployments in 2012
• Please let us know of any interest in participating, or of questions, comments and especially suggestions
13
Thank You!!