Combining Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) with Acoustic Arrays to Enhance Interpretation...
-
Upload
darleen-lindsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Combining Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) with Acoustic Arrays to Enhance Interpretation...
Combining Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) with
Acoustic Arrays to Enhance Interpretation of Fish
Movements.Roger A. Rulifson, Jennifer Cudney-Burch, Roger A. Rulifson, Jennifer Cudney-Burch,
Ryan MulliganRyan Mulligan1, 1, and Andrea Dell’Apaand Andrea Dell’ApaInstitute for Coastal Science and PolicyInstitute for Coastal Science and Policy
East Carolina UniversityEast Carolina University11Queen’s University, Kingston, OntarioQueen’s University, Kingston, Ontario
Mid-Atlantic Regional Association Coastal Ocean Observing System
Baltimore, November 1, 2012
Concerns of the Eastern Seaboard• Wind farms• Offshore oil• Wave/tidal power• Climate
change/sea level rise
• Storm surge
Concerns of the Eastern Seaboard• Wind farms• Offshore oil• Wave/tidal power• Climate
change/sea level rise
• Storm surge
Concerns of the Eastern Seaboard• Wind farms• Offshore oil• Wave/tidal power• Climate
change/sea level rise
• Storm surge
Concerns of the Eastern Seaboard• Wind farms• Offshore oil• Alternative energy• Climate
change/sea level rise
• Storm surge
Isabelle Inlet, Hatteras Island, NC
North Carolina Concerns• Wind farms• Offshore exploration for
natural gas• Barrier Island development/
inlet stabilization• Wave and tidal energy• Military uses – acoustics,
bombing ranges, etc.• Sustainability of commercial &
sport fisheries• Sea level rise/storm surge A migratory fish
Coastal Migratory Pathways• Marine mammals• Sea turtles• Atlantic and shortnose
sturgeons• Coastal pelagic sharks,
skates and rays• Anadromous fishes
(striped bass, shads, river herrings)
• Coastal & estuarine dependent species
• What influences seasonal migrations along the coast?
• What role does Cape Hatteras play in influencing timing and continuance of coastal migratory pathways?
Basic Questions --
Spiny Dogfish Squalus acanthias
• Animal behavior in nature can tell us what habitats are “best”
• Changing use patterns often correlated with anthropogenic change
• Spiny dogfish – most hated and most abundant coastal shark in the world
Historical Migratory Paradigm
United States
Canada
Atlantic OceanWinter
Summer 32
5
4
1Atlantic Ocean
United States
Canada
A B
Overwinter off North Carolina
Springtime northward movement to New England and Canada
Fall southward movement to North Carolina
Northwest Atlantic Ocean
www.fishbase.org
Management practices in the NW Atlantic Ocean were based on:
Generalized knowledge of distribution and abundance patterns from the NEFSC trawl surveys and supporting scientific research
Temperatures8 – 11o C
Water depths to 300 m
Salinities 32-35 ppt
Connecting habitats (NEFSC data) averaged over
entire Eastern Seaboard
Pamlico Sound
Albemarle Sound
Cape Hatteras
Traditional Mark and Recapture Locations Using Commercial Fishing Vessels
East Carolina University mark/recapture studies, 1996-2011
Non-Acoustic Tagging Research,1996-2007
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Days At Large (DAL)
Dis
tan
ce T
rave
led
(K
m)
Days at large (DAL)
Dis
tan
ce (
Km
)
Calendar date
Methods• Mark-recapture tag study (1996-2008)• Floy single barb dart with stainless steel insert
Seasonal Shifts in Sea Surface Temperature (SST)
Winter SST Summer SST
Habitats in Study Area
Cape Lookout (wind data)
Cape Hatteras
Methods: Acoustic Tag Study
Acoustic Results(Single detection rate coast-wide)
Year released
Number released
Number detected
Detection rate
2009 53 39 78%
2010 40 35 87.5%
Overall 93 74 80%
Overall Mark/Recapture rate of 47,000 releases = 1.2%
Preliminary Results: Array Detection
Acoustic Detections Confirm Seasonal Migration Pattern
North Carolina
Delaware Bay
Gulf of Maine
Acoustic Array – always nice to have new stuff!
NOTE: This was covered with red bottom paint prior to deployment.
RDI Workhorse and Trawl Deflector
Retrieval 6 weeks later – paint completely removed; bio-fouling
Acoustic Array, or “Listening Fence”
VR2W
Shallow ADCP: 30 ft
Deep ADCP: 70 ft
Mid-site @ 45 ft, (not processed)
Summary of Detections (Array)
Dogfish Passage, Jan-Apr 2009Bo
ttom
wat
er te
mpe
ratu
re (C
)
Detected on multiple receivers mid-array
Deep Currents - 2009East
West
North
South
V
U
Deep Currents - 2009East
West
North
South
Shallow Currents - 2009East
West
North
South
u
v
Shallow Currents - 2009East
West
North
South
Shallow Location1
2
1 2
Shark #54099
Shallow Location1
2
1 2
Shark #54099
Shallow Water Fish Detections• Currents at the deep and
shallow site are very similar, indicating a relatively uniform along-shelf flow.
• Fish detections are generally more common when the current are moderate (0.2-0.4 m/s) and are flowing eastward (+u component).
V
U
East
West
2009 Detectionsvs.
Bottom Temperature(ADCP)
ShallowRange: 6.3 – 18.7 ºCDetections: 9.0, 10.5 – 12.0 ºC
DeepRange: 7.6 – 18.8 ºCDetections: 9.5, 12.0 – 13.0 ºC
Published Temp Associations:47 ºF or 8.3 ºC
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Frequency of Occurrence
Tidal
Heigh
t (m
)
100100 50 50
Preference for a specific tidal height ?
MLLW
February 2010
# of detections
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Frequency of Occurrence
Tidal
Heigh
t (m
)
100100 50 50
A lot of sharks detected around MLLW
February 2010
# of detections
-0.1
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Frequency of Occurrence
Tidal
Heigh
t (m
)
100100 50 50
A peak in the detections at a monthly tidal minimum( 8 sharks, 733 detections)
February 2010
# of detections
February 2010
1-week example
Tid
al Height (m
) February 14 – 21, 2010
Tid
al Height (m
) February 14 – 21, 2010
March 1-7, 2010T
idal H
eight (m)
Biological Observations• 1/3 of the tagged sharks moved around Cape Hatteras• Redetection rates are very high (80%) compared to
conventional floy tag studies (1-4%)• Sharks encountered the array multiple times within a
season (2-8 separate days)• Residence time varied (10 minutes – 24 hours; multiple
days in a row)• Crepuscular onshore / offshore movements ?????• Hatteras Bight is an important migration pathway for
species of concern (Atlantic sturgeon & sand tiger sharks)
Remaining Challenges• Behavioral data needs to be coupled with environmental
data for context – WHY do these animals move when they do?
• Hatteras Bight is very dynamic – need to combine multiple types of environmental data together to understand the system
• Better methods for array deployment including receivers, ADCPs, and passive acoustic devices (high energy, commercial fishing)
Acoustic Wave GliderWeather Station
Water Current Speed & Direction;Wave Direction; Depth
Salinity & Temperature
Acoustics –Active & Passive
Acknowledgements• North Carolina Sea Grant• Dewey Hemilright (F/V TarBaby)• Chris Hickman (F/V BoutTime)• Coastal Resources Management Ph.D
Program, ECU• ICSP, ECU• Office of Diving / Water Safety, ECU• Department of Biology, ECU• Department of Physics, ECU• Department of Geography, ECU• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service• Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission• Island Hide-A-Way Campground
(Buxton, NC)• N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries• Oden’s Dock Marina (Hatteras, NC)• Avon Seafood (Hatteras, NC)• Vemco sales and support team• Knauss Fellowship Team / NOAA /
National Sea Grant Office
• Hans Vogelsong, ECU• Lauriston King• John Rummel• Steve Sellers• Eric Diaddorio• Mike Baker• Mark Keusenkothen• Sara Miribilio• Cecilia Krahforst• Andrea del’Apa• Katie Kleber• Lyndell Bade• Dan Furinsky• Tim Wamer• Jim Saupe• Gene Oakley• Chris Bonnerup• Garry Wright• Chuck Bangley• Craig Harms,DVM (NCSU)• Dorcas O’Rourke, DVM (ECU IACUC)• Tom Savoy (CTDEP)• Dewayne Fox (DSU)• Bill Hoffman (Mass. DMF)• Paul Music (WHOI)
And the friends, family, and colleagues whose names don’t fit!