Com Mu Tar Ism

8/8/2019 Com Mu Tar Ism

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/com-mu-tar-ism 1/9

Home Alex Jones Radio Show News Sections Multimedia Prison Planet Forum Shop Advertise Contact Search

of 9An open letter to all members of local Tea Parties

10/9/2010http://www.infowars.com/an-open-letter-to-all-members-of-local-tea-parties/



An open letter to all members of local Tea Parties

Niki Raapana

Living Outside the Dialectic

October 7, 2010

Every policy the Tea Party has protested is based entirely in communitarian ideology. From National

Health Care to the Bank Bailout to the Stimulus Package to Stop the IRS and End the Fed, it’s all

communitarian. Yet the actual word, communitarianism, is missing from your protests and debates.

Our entire country is being led down a communitarian path without any idea of how it’s happening. So,I’d like to present it to you as a topic for discussion.

This is not an attempt to take-over or co-opt your party. I have zero aspirations for political or

leadership positions. Simply bringing the topic of communitarian development before American voters

has been the driving force behind everything I’ve written about it for the past ten years. My primary

goal is to make the changeover to communitarian government open to public debates in every affected

country.

Communitarianism is the belief that individual and national sovereignty must be balanced against the

needs of the global collective. Their entire foundation for forced social evolution rests on their Big Idea

that all the world’s people will be “free” after everyone gives up any claims to their personal freedom.

Defined as the new “spirit” of community, Communitarians believe they are leading mankind into an

advanced moral and spiritual state of being. Across the globe, communitarian gurus promote a global

program designed to create one big, planned, gated community. They call it sustainable community

development.

Anti communitarianism is the antithesis to communitarianism. That means we think the opposite of

communitarians. We d isagree with their Big Idea. We oppose forced social evolution. We disrespecttheir organizations. We object to communitarian programs, policies, and laws being enforced upon

nations that have not legally ad opted supremacy of communitarian law . We hate what they’ve done to

America.

The Anti Communitarian League began in Seattle, Washington in the spring of 1999. We were renters

who became targets in a huge land war between the community planners and our wealthy landlord. I

spent three years volunteering my time to help “slumlord” Hugh Sisley resist hostile, “innovative”

government land use actions against him and hi s tenants. (Sisely and the City won; We the Tenants

lost.)

The City of Seattle and King County government had established new agencies with new agency rules.

These offices were granted expanded power t o write and enforce new judicial administrative

regulations. Their new laws supposedly completely overruled our 4th and 5th Amendment Rights.

When we complained and insisted on a Redress of Grievances, City officials told us our rights had

already been balanced against the “rights of the community at large.” When they could not provide

evidence for this drastic change to U.S. Rule of Law, I began reading everything about it that I could

find .

I learned very quickly that this wasn’t just an ordinary local land dispute. It was apparent to me that we

were on the front lines of a massive multi-front war against our individual, state and national freedom.

It took me a full year of reading before I identified the replacement system driving the new actions.

American officials rarely tell American voters the name of the new system. The Reinvention of America

into a Sustainable Communitarian Paradise was never supposed to be debated or voted upon by the

American people. By the time we found out about it, it was, according to our officials, already a “done

deal.”

In the beginning I was still naive enough to think lots of other Americans would join in our fight. I

asked everyone I saw if they knew the Bill of Rights had been replaced with communitarian values.

Most of them laughed right in my face. I wrote hundreds of snail mail letters and spent thousands of

hours studying, reading, and hoping someone more qualified would take over the resistance. I was

shocked to learn we were the only anti communitarians in the United States. I remain horrified by the

fact that every university in the country teaches communitarianism yet our original thesis against it is

the only one ever written.

A lengthy study of the recently available online documents about your party shows me that your loosely affiliated organizations have not taken an official position on the philosophy that drives the

Reinvention of American Government. I’ve found a few local groups that have posted information

about UN Local Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. I haven’t found any local Tea Party groups

(besides affiliates of Gigi Bowman in NY) who are being asked to discuss or vote on communitarian

changes to the U.S. system.

Since my above definition of anti communitarian thinking is based entirely in my own personal

research, experience and understanding, it’s only fair to provide you with a short synopsis of who I am

and how I came to be an anti communitarian thinker.

In the early 80s while I was attending college in Anchorage, Alaska (and bartending nights at

Whitekey’s Fly By Night Club) I became a registered Libertarian voter. My friend Kenzo and I even

attended a fund raiser for Dick Randolf and won a lunch “date” with Ed Clark. Having read At las





Shrugged in the sixth grade, I thought I knew what the Libertarians stood for.

When I transferred to UMAss, Amherst in 1984, I did deep background research on U.S. policies

toward the Sandinistas and found myself opening up to socialism. After writing two extra credit

documentaries on U.S. Economic Policy in Central America, I began identifying my politics as

Libertarian, Socialist & Feminist, and later added Green to my list. (I never identified with either t he

Democrats or the Republicans.)

I think I clicked with the Libertarians because I was convinced they represented individual liberty. My

freedom to move whenever I want to move on means everything to me. But I a lso come from German

Wisconsin farm stock and have a deep respect for people who work the land. I admired the socialists

because I thought they represented land starved Nicaraguans against the arable land gluttony of the

ruling Somoza family. I grew up on Steinem and Bella and had always considered myself a feminist. I

love camping and being in the woods, so I naturally assumed that’s what being a Green was a ll about.

It was only after I began fighting the new community development policies in 1999 that I did a

thorough vetting of all my political beliefs. What I learned was most difficult to swallow.

My first realization was that the Libertarian Party was unwilling to step up and debate the

communitarians, even after W ashington Post columnist E.J. Dionne wrote that the “last great debate”

in American politics was between the Libertarians and the Communitarians. I later realized the party’s

founders were internationalists promoting free market/free trade communitarianism in the United

States.

My second realization was that Bella signed the Communitarian Platform. Feminism, as it turns out, is

just another dialectical branch of c ommunitarianism.

My third big realization was the role socialism plays in the phony dialectical evolution into

communitarianism. Socialism, like capitalism, exists only to further the communitarian synthesis.

The Green Party ended up being number two on my enemy list, the first place reserved forever for their

ideological affiliate Dr. Amitai Etzioni, founder of the Communitarian Network.

By 2002 I decided I would only vote for candidates who defend the U.S. Bill of Rights by o penly

attacking communitarian policies in the U.S.. Obviously I’ve never voted since then.

Focusing mainly on The Communitarian Reinvention of American Government under Presidents

Clinton and Bush II, some of my ACL research was devoted to minor communitarian Third Way

politicans like Senator Evan Bayh. I did make note of Senator Barack Obama’s introduction as the

Third Way Wonder Boy in 2004. All I needed to know about Obama when he ran for president was the

fact that Communitarian Platform signer Professor John McNight also signed Obama’s Harvard Law

School application.

It was during the 2008 elections that I

became acquainted with some people who

supported Ron Paul. When I was unable

to find Congressman Paul using the wordcommunitarianism once in a ll his years of

published speeches against the U.N.

Agenda, and his office never responded to

my inquiries, I refused to endorse him on

my websites. The ACL has endorsed only a

couple of candidates in our entire time

online, and one’s a Canadian. When the

Ron Paul Revolution became the Tea

Party protests, I didn’t join, but I was

happy to see the turnouts. I was relieved

that our people were finally showing some gumption.

I am now convinced your smallest local groups are in the position of taking any political direction the

members choose to take. Maybe once your members are introduced to their enemies as communitarian

thinkers, you can stop everyone else and their brother from defining what it is you stand against.

“Vast forests have already been sacrificed to the public debate about the Tea Party: whatit is, what it means, where it’s going. But after lengthy study of the phenomenon, I’ve

concluded that the whole miserable narrative boils down to one stark fact: They’re full of

shit. All of them.” http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/210904

According to the Communitarians, the U.S. Constitution (and all national government) is “outdated”

and poses a barrier to achieving world peace and justice. This appears to be in direct opposition to your

principles:

“There already is a universally accepted national tea party statement and a national tea

party platform. We’ve had them for a long time. The national tea party statement is called

the Declaration of Independence, and the national tea party platform is the Constitution

of the United States. And come to think of it, I c an name six or seven national tea party

leaders—revered figures who command the movement’s loyalties. Their names are

A D V E R T I S E M E N T





among those signed at the bottom of our national tea party statement and our national

tea party platform. They are John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin

Franklin, George Washington, James Madison.” Tea Party Dec laration of Independence

from Political Party Loyalties By Paul Beaird March 23, 2010

There are several indications your party is being misled and co-opted by communitarians.

1. Some people are already calling you communitarians:

“They’re what I call “molecular,” or communitarian, individualists — that is, individualscooperating with others to achieve what the politicians promise but can’t deliver.”

http://www.thenews.com.pk/03-10-2010/opinion/7993.htm

2. Branches of your movement are tricking you into supporting Right Wing Conservative

Communitarians like Pa lin and Beck:

Sarah Palin, Tea Party darling, targets Democrats backing ‘Obamacare’ on website ‘Take Back the 20′

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/09/24/2010-09-

24_sarah_palin_tea_party_darling_targets_democrats_backing_obamacare_on_website_tak.html

3. Communitarianism is a social science that infiltrates national and state governments via social

development programs. It’s called Socio-Economics. Why would Tea Party members discount it as an

issue?

“This is not a movement based on social issues,” Melanie Morgan, a former talk show

host who has been active in Tea Party Express, told USA TODAY earlier this year. “Many

conservatives are involved only because of the fiscal aspect of smaller government, of

lower taxation, of an accountability as far as the debt is concerned, the runaway spending by the liberal C ongress.” http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2010-09-20-

values20_ST_N.htm

4. The Left Wing Communitarian President of the United States is using Right Wing Communitarian

Shills and Rolling Stone Magazine to slander you as corporate backed phonies:

RS: What do you think of the Tea Party and the people behind it?

Obama: I think the Tea Party is an amalgam, a mixed bag of a lot o f different strains in

American politics that have been there for a long time. There are some strong and sincere

libertarians who are in the Tea Party who generally don’t believe in government

intervention in the market or socially. There are some social conservatives in the Tea

Party who are rejecting me the same way they rejected Bill Clinton, the same way they

would reject any Democratic president as being too liberal or too progressive. There are

strains in the Tea Party that are troubled by what they saw as a series of instances in

which the middle-class and working-class people have been abused or hurt by special

interests and Washington, but their anger i s misdirected.

And then there are probably some aspects of the Tea Party that are a little darker, that

have to do with anti-immigrant sentiment or are troubled by what I represent as the

president. So I think it’s hard to characterize the Tea Party as a whole, and I think it’s still

defining itself.

RS: Do you think that it’s being manipulated?

Obama; There’s no doubt that the infrastructure and the financing of the Tea Party come

from some very traditional, very powerful, special-interest lobbies. I don’t think this is a

secret. Dick Armey and FreedomWorks, which was one of the first organizational

mechanisms to bring Tea Party fo lks together, are financed by very conservative

industries and forces that are opposed to enforcement of environmental laws, that are

opposed to an energy policy that would be different than the fossil-fuel-based approach

we’ve been taking, that don’t b elieve in regulations that protect workers from safety

violations in the workplace, that want to make sure that we are not regulating the

financial industries in ways that we have.

There’s no doubt that there is genuine anger, frustration and anxiety in the public at large

about the worst financial crisis we’ve experienced since the Great Depression. Part of

what we have to keep in mind here is this recession is worse than the Ronald Reagan

recession of the Eighties, the 1990-91 recession, and the 2001 recession combined. The

depths of it have been profound. This body politic took a big hit in the gut, and that

always roils up our politics, and can make people angry. But because of the ability of a lot

of very well-funded groups to point that anger — I think misdirect that anger — it is

translating into a relevant political force in this election.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/209395

5. Obama’s and the RS writer’s opinion seems to be completely at odds with average people’s opinion

within the movement:





“Obama could not be more wrong — in fact, his thinking shows a lot more about his

problems than the tea party’s. If the Tea Party is be ing run by special interest lobbies,

then our special interest lobbies are in a lot of trouble. The convention was held at the

Mill Valley community center. There were about 500 people there; it was standing room

only. They spent the whole day milling about between different tables t hat represented

various groups, ranging from the NRA to the seller of a cookbook of “conservative

recipes.” I didn’t look, but I assume it was full of recipes for meatloaf and mashed

potatoes with nary a sprig of endive in sight. There were funny T-shirts, cut-outs where

you can get your picture taken next to Lincoln, Reagan, or Palin, and lots of sugary foods

from Costco.

Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad)

It was all very unprofessional, by which I mean that it did not seem the least bit stage

managed or fake, in the way that the events put on by professional political operatives

usually are. It was all quite spontaneous. Here’s an example. The speakers were

unorganized, and had to speak in the hall in competition with all of the tables. So if

people were not interested in a speaker, they would just go on buying and selling books

and T-shirts or signing up for petitions, and eventually the speaker would be drowned

out. If they were interested, the chatter would stop and eventually people would stop and

listen. It was, in a charming way, the competition of the free market of ideas at work.

http://www.libertycentral.org/president-obama-is-wrong-about-the-tea-party-2010-10

JakeSense, 19 September 2010 12:30AM said, Please stop repeating the lie that Tea Party

members are “Conservatives”. Numerous polls in the US consistently show that almost

half of people who identify with the Tea Party — myself included — are Liberal

Democrats. The Tea Party has one, and only one goal — Fiscal Responsibility. Just

because some fools (Sarah Palin and Glen Beck) are trying to co-opt the Tea Party does

not make any the rest of us Conservative. We can disagree vehemently with Palin and

Beck, yet still think the government must learn to balance it’s budget, stop piling on so

much debt and the Federal government spending is out of control.

http://www.alternet.org/story/148206/this_country_just_can%

27t_deal_with_reality_any_more

6. Communitarian Radicals think they are the experts on what you really mean:

“When tea party activists say they want to change Washington, what they mean is, they

want to get rid of politics.” http://perspectives.thirdway.org/?p=874

I realize “forests” have already been cut down trying to explain your Tea Party. There appears to be a

few solid and agreed upon principles behind it, but every description of what you represent

incorporates the writer’s personal views and political beliefs into their definition of you. From Obama

down to each local group online, the Tea Party is whatever you want it to be. Now that I fully grasp that

amazing truth, may I humbly suggest you consider adding anti communitarianism to your local group’s

discussion list next time you meet up?

Sincerely,

Niki Raapana

Anti Communitarian League

Print this page.

Comment Rules

Login

Username:

Password:

Remember me

Register

Lost your password?

33 Responses to “An open letter to all members of local Tea Parties”

motley Says:

October 7th, 2010 at 9:33 am

Login »





Thanks for a very well thought out and written letter. I have heard of this philosophy, but only inbrief passing. I think everyone should read this and give it at least some thought. I have also cometo the conclusion that no gov’t is the only answer, a move back to local rule and self sustainingcommunities is probably the only true answer.

OOPS Reply:October 7th, 2010 at 3:09 pm

OH, ANOTHER WORD TO ADD TO MY LIST….Everytime I see or hear these words it makes me want to pull the trigger!Global, global warming, climate change, vaccination, bailout, evolution, czar, intrinsic value, double-dip…..I could go on forever!

Francis Marion Reply:October 8th, 2010 at 1:47 am

“Communitarianism”. Another name for socialism, communism,rabid liberalism, etc.OF COURSE we are against “communitarianism”. Its just not

a word used in the everyday American lexicon.So this person coins a 25 cent word and claims “nobody knowsabout or refers to it” . BIG DEAL. “A rose by any other name…”.The author is hungry for personal recognition. OK we see youlike the word “communitarianism” as a descriptive term.But if Ron Paul starts using it in speeches people who alreadyknow what fascism, socialism, communism and the New WorldOrder is will say: “What the hell is that?”

If the author likes their favorite word, sobeit. Don’t try andforce everyone to learn and use it just because it best describesthe New World Order to YOU.

The GLB Reply:October 8th, 2010 at 12:03 pm

Francis, thank you for stating what to me is obvious. You are completely correct: why use a wordwith which most people are unfamiliar; and why not endorse Ron Paul when he is against everything

a ‘Communitarian’ represents, but doesn’t use that ’25 cent word’ to identify them.

highmountaindrifterReply:October 8th, 2010 at 9:38 am

i am with you.all we need is somethingto set our site on.then pull the trigger

Sir Baby De Porky Reply:October 8th, 2010 at 5:53 am

That’s a pipe dream …

A country needs ONE good king …

P.S. There is no other way !!!

blueyou Reply:October 8th, 2010 at 4:34 pm

Right over our heads..wake up—wake up—-wake upGot Jam?Mint

patriot1776 Reply:October 9th, 2010 at 1:02 pm

THIS GUY IS A STUPID BRIT PHEASANT

HE DOESNT KNOW WHAT FREEDOM IS.


Motley, you would serve yourself well to watch, even, the abridged version of “The American Formof Government”, (free on youtube) because your statement, ‘I have also come to the conclusion that

no gov’t is the only answer…” shows that you are historically unaware of what the founding fathersdeclared, ‘that gov’t is a necessary evil.’ They were also aware that it needed to be limited, thus theConstitution and the Bill of Rights.

No gov’t leads to Anarchy, which leads to an Authoritarian/Totalitarian Despotic rule by anOligarchy.

Trust me, you do not want ‘no gov’t’.

Battle Hymn Says:


I like this Anti Communitarian League. Excellent article.

theburren Says:


All in favor of adding anti communitarianism to the local group discussion lists say Aye~

roaddog6 Says:


we’ll probably never know how far down the rabbit hole goes.

theburren Reply:October 7th, 2010 at 11:09 am

Probably goes all the way to China:)





ReyZ Says:

October 7th, 2010 at 12:12 pm

Niki,

I must congratulate you on one of the best written articles I have ever come across regarding thetrue meaning of constitutional conservatism.

I shall endeavor to learn more about your organization.

Cydonia Says:October 7th, 2010 at 4:03 pm

The word “communitarianism” is just another NWO buzzword like antidisestablishmentarinism from

the 1960s. It is a load of crap that this article even appears here. It was a waste of my time to evenread this article.

As for the “Tea Party”, it is an attempt to include under central control all those who belong to NOparty. People should carry signs that say “NO party” at the “Tea party” rallies.

wolfhausen Says:


i agree this article is complete garbage.

magnacarta Says:


OHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM OHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMOHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM OMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

OMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM OMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

centerline Says:


Its so simple even a caveman can figure it out.Go and simply read what the people in the tea partywants,Its very simple.I don’t think they have some big secret agenda.And yet no one gets it..

centerline Reply:October 7th, 2010 at 8:46 pm

WE THE PEOPLE

LindaI Reply:October 8th, 2010 at 10:43 am

Exactly…We the People. Stay focussed on the Bill of Rights. Every person, at any given time, is in his

own stage of understanding and development. The Bill of Rights guaranteed our freedom to choosewhatever quest we like, as long as we do not harm others in their quest for understanding anddevelopment.

TechiePatriot Says:


I have a better word for it than “communitarian ” I like to think more of TREASON.

calvin Says:


Oh whatever — there’s a term that has no legs… “communitarian” — and what about “anti-

communitarian” — wow… that’s going to catch like wild fire

Please… you know… think about it, the idiotic Libertarians with their “anti-government” stance cannever answer for what happens to workers in events like the “shirtwaist fire of 1911″ or about thecoal mines in eastern pennsylvania where the owners had virtual slave labor without anygovernment regulation. Hasn’t it become clear that the M.O. of the “entrepeneur” the “capitalist” (asit were) is completely sociopathic and without remorse?

Somebody needed to intervene, or perhaps somebody _didn’t_ need to intervene. What protectiondid those mine workers have against the Pinkertons hired by the owners to kill them? Certainlygovernment didn’t protect them.

I think this country is a gaggle of jackasses who are historically illiterate. You’re going to get what

you deserve. Go on an airplane and get a taste of the future. Meanwhile, you can all just blow me.


Calvin, I especially loved the redundancy of this statement: Anti communitarianism is the antithesisto communitarianism.

Wow, that’s deep. I think I could write a whole series of papers using that premise.

To the Author: Anti ‘anything’ is the antithesis of ‘anything’, e.g. the Anti-Christ is the antithesis of the Christ. Do you see how that works, or do you need more examples?

rajy Reply:October 8th, 2010 at 2:37 pm

Hey calvin. The government intervened to stop the union miners from standing up for themselvesnot to stop the mining company from killing/giving slave wages.

get you facts straight.





patriot1776 Reply:October 9th, 2010 at 1:04 pm

THTS RIGHT, THE MINERS THEMSELVES STOOD UP AND BANED TOGEATHER ALL OF THEMWEARING RED HANKERCHIEFS

HENSE THE TERM RED NECK

A COMPLIMENT, NOT AN INSULT.

NUTS Says:


“We The People” are the only party needed!

dollop of tennessee Says:


Here is the condensed version.

We, the Tea Party, are fighting the Fascist takeover of America, and in our midst we have sometraitors to the cause who are preying upon the woefully ignorant.

There is nothing new under the sun.

John Says:


Here please find an outline of the Communitarian objectives:

**http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communitarian/niki.htm

(please paste without the asterisks)

Here you will find some info on the founder thereof (Amitai Etzioni, a ‘Jew’ by the way)

and the address of The Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies at gwu:

**http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/general_biography_information.html

It is part and parcel of UN Agenda 21, and contrary to some comments here,

is very real and very relevant.

Incidentally, the author did not coin the term.

John

pattybsl Says:


remember the Borg?

madmuo Says:


Hey John, I’m curious, what ethnic/religous group do YOU belong to, Catholic, Hindu, or NativeAmerican? Let’s try a little experiment, ok? The next time you think “Jew” try to conciously replacethat word with the name or YOUR ethnic/religous group, I know, I know, they did that with the Blueeyes/Brown eyes thing in third grade, but you obviously didn’t get it then, so please try again, eh?I’m just sayin’…..

John Reply:October 9th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

No, you are accusing me of being a racist.

Judaism is a belief system (a creed), not a race or a bloodline.

I DO discriminate by creed, as it extends to behavior.

I mentioned he was a ‘Jew’ because the ‘Jew’s consider themselves ‘Gods Chosen’

(and are atheists!) and consider us to be cattle and them the rancher.

They also pride themselves on being clever and deceptive and taking undue advantage.

They have one set of rules for them, and a different one for the ‘outsiders’ (untermunchen).

They are not alone in that but they are the only ones openly extorting the USA

using nuclear weapons stolen (gifted) by the USA and demanding to ‘Rule the World’.

This renders them quite unique and so worthy of note.

For this reason and for the reason that the ‘Jews’ created communism,

and were instrumental in tricking the US into ww1 and ww2, and more recent

adventures in the middle east.

I consider communitarianism to be a part of a bigger plan, one with three world wars,

like Albert Pike mentioned.

And if the ‘Protocols of Zion” are a forgery, they are a surprisingly accurate one.

Please find and read The Secret History of the Atomic Bomb by Eustace Mullins,

learn about the real reason the atomic bomb was developed, to produce the UN,





a product of the International Bankers.

These creeps have been scamming on us since before you were born.

John


Might want to check out the ‘Dominionists’ if you are into the

study of belief systems.

Some say they have taken over the ranks of the US defense establishment.

Look at stories from the USAF Academy for example..

These folks might be trying to do their interpretation of ‘God’s Will’

using hijacked US nuclear weapon(s) (MINOT).

Please be aware that the ‘Project for a New American Century’ (PNAC) document

has a doppelganger in Israel called ‘Clean Break’.

Both were written by the same people.

John


And here is another bit to chew on..

The ‘six million’ figure did not originate post ww2, and in fact was mentioned

before ww2 even started.

It seems that a part of the mythology is that six million must die

in order for some messiha to arrive with the standard thousand years bit.

These people are acting out a vile passion play.

We have free will, you need not perform to script!!

Now.. the Israelis seem to have a preoccupation with getting six million there,

and I suspect that the British Empire set Israel up to be destroyed,

thereby satisfying both parties wishes.

Food for Thought.

John

Join the discussion, sign up/login to post a comment!

© 2010 Infowars.com is an Free Speech Systems, LLC company. All rights reserved.


Com Mu Tar Ism

Documents

Transcript of Com Mu Tar Ism