Colonoscopy Not the cure for Acute Lower GI Bleeding Liz O’Gorman Surgical Intern Cork University...
-
Author
holly-hines -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Colonoscopy Not the cure for Acute Lower GI Bleeding Liz O’Gorman Surgical Intern Cork University...
-
ColonoscopyNot the cure for Acute Lower GI BleedingLiz OGormanSurgical InternCork University Hospital
-
Acute within 24 hours
LGIB in Irish Healthcare System- Diverticular Bleed- Angiodysplasia- IBD/Colitis- Neoplasia- Rectal Trauma- Iatrogenic
Aim of Colonoscopy is to diagnose and treat bleeding sources
I will discuss:
1. Limitations of colonoscopy
2. Risks of colonoscopy
3. Better alternative options
-
Why not perform Colonoscopy?
-
Long standing debate
Numerous studies tried to address this question
No gold standard test for acute LGIB
-
AIM = treat and diagnose bleeding source1 need to identify source
2 facilities to implement treatment
-
Limitations of Colonoscopy
-
1. Bowel PreparationUnique to endoscopic interventions
Cleansing bowel of stool and blood imperative to diagnosis
Unprepped- caecum in 55-70% Chaudry at al- reduced identification of bleeding sites Tada et al- increased risk of perforation Strate et al
-
Diverticular bleeds- multiple subtle bleeding sites- active bleeding identified 21% Jensen et al, 2000- aggressive bowel prep
Green at al, 2005- 62-64% endoscopic view rated poor to fair
-
2. Stigmata of HaemorrhageDiagnostic interventions alone do not alter rebleeding and operative rates
Variable reports of identification- 7.7% 43 % Angtuaco et al, 2001; Schmuelewitz et al, 2003
Bleeding intermittent- difficult to differentiate fresh blood from old blood and stool
20% haematochezia secondary to Upper GI bleed - Jensen et al, 1998; Laine et al 2010
-
3. Your EnvironmentNot all centres have same access to on call colonoscopy
Trained personel- trained nursing staff- endoscopy suite / OT- anaesthetist if pt unstable
Waiting for prep increases likelihood of out of hours colonoscopy
Strate et al, 2003- median time from admission to colonoscopy 17hours for LGIBmanaged with urgent colonoscopy
-
Risks
-
1. Perforation
Low: 0.3-1.3%
Catastrophic with high mortality patient already compromised
-
2. Volume ShiftsRapid bowel preps
Haemodynamically compromised patients
Renal compromise and electrolyte imbalances Goldman et al,1982
Left ventricular dysfunction- exacerbation of symptoms and ECF volume overload
-
Alternatives
-
AngiographyDiagnostic and therapeuticSuperselective embolisation
Meta-analysis J GI Surg 2005 Khanna A et al- Diverticular Bleed 85% success*if fails < 2 days- Non-diverticular Bleed 50% success* if fails < 2 days
-
CT AngiographyTriage prior to angiography (avoid risks associated with intervention)
ALL patients with a suspected, known or previously treated AAA- ? Aortoenteric fistula
Bleeding of 2cc/sec
-
Radionucleotide ScintigraphyRadiolabelled RBCs (99mTc)
Identifies LGIB site in up to 78% of cases
Bleeding of 0.2 cc/sec
No intervention risks
-
SummaryColonoscopy- difficult to reach caecum without aggressive bowel prep- difficult to identify bleeding source even with bowel prep- prep associated electrolyte disturbances and volume shifts- risk of perforation- median time from admission 17hours ? acute
Alternatives- CT / CT Angio / Radionucleotide Scans
-
BOTTOM LINEColonoscopy diagnostically poor in acute LGIB
You can not treat something you can not diagnose
Acute lower GI bleeding usually stops without intervention
-
Thank You