College Persistence and Completion Strategies: Opportunities for Scaling Up
description
Transcript of College Persistence and Completion Strategies: Opportunities for Scaling Up
College Persistence and Completion Strategies: Opportunities for Scaling Up
Terry E. SpradlinDavid J. Rutkowski
Nathan A. BurroughsJustin R. Lang
October 29, 2010
Setting the Stage
2
Austra
lia
Poland
Portug
al
Icelan
d
Slovak
Rep
ublic
New Zea
land
Norway
Korea
Finlan
d
Russia
n Fed
eratio
n
Sweden
United
Stat
es1
Netherl
ands
Israe
l
Denmark
United
King
dom
Hunga
ry
Czech
Rep
ublic
OECD avera
ge
Sloven
ia
EU19 av
erage Ita
ly
Austria
Japa
n
Irelan
dChil
e
Greece
Estonia
Spain
Switzerl
and
German
y
Mexico
Belgium
Turkey
Luxe
mbourg
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Entry rates into Type A tertiary education (1995, 2000 and 2008)2008 1995 2000
1. The entry rates for tertiary-type A programmes include the entry rates for tertiary-type B programmes. Countries are ranked in descending order of entry rates for tertiary-type A education in 2008.Source: OECD. Table A2.4. See Annex 3 for notes (www.oecd.org/edu/eag2010).
College Access
College access has improved dramatically nationwide, and in Indiana alone the college-access rate has
increased from 33% in 1986 to 63% today.
3
An Example!Indiana’s 21st Century Scholars
Began in 1990 as Indiana's way of raising the educational aspirations of low and moderate-income families
At 6th-8th Grade the Scholars make a pledge to:• Graduate with an Indiana High School Diploma • Achieve a cumulative high school GPA of at least 2.0 on a 4.0 scale.• Not use illegal drugs or alcohol, or commit a crime.• Apply for admission to an eligible Indiana college, university or proprietary school as• a high school senior.• Apply on time for state and federal financial aid. The Program Provides:• Undergraduate tuition scholarship to an eligible college or university;• 14 Twenty-first Century Scholars Regional Support Programs throughout the state that offer activities such
as tutoring, mentoring, and college visits.• Annual statewide and regional parent conferences.• Monthly regional parent meetings.
4
A little more…
– Over 60% are first-generation students
– 40% of Scholars are minority students
– Average family income is 58% less than the average FAFSA filer
– Scholars are much more likely to attend college than other Pell Grant-
eligible students (the most appropriate comparison group)
– However, persistence and completion rates for Scholars are statistically
indistinguishable from the Pell Grant-eligible group
5
Policy Shifts
• Access remains a concern
• But what happens once access improves?
– In other words is it enough to simply get a student’s foot in the door?
6
Turning Towards Persistence
• Many strategies to improve college persistence and completion remain problematic.
– Graduate with four year degree within 6 years• Indiana=55% U.S.= 56%
– Graduate with two year degree within 3 years • Indiana=27% U.S.=28%
– Degree attainment varies greatly by race/ethnicity
7
Objectives of Report
• Examine existing research on outcomes of programs designed to increase higher education success of underrepresented student populations
• Identify effective programs and/or strategies for replication or scaling up
• Take an inventory of existing retention and persistence initiatives currently in use at Indiana institutions
8
So…
What did we learn?
9
Literature
• Academic literature is helpful and plentiful on this topic. – Perhaps the most highly researched topic in American
higher education (Seidman, 2005). • Fortunately for us we have one of the foremost experts
in the field on our panel today!
– There exist a number of models…• But they largely suggest that the decision to remain in
college is the product of a number of different influences. How these influences operate is a more difficult topic.
10
Literature
• Academic preparation is a largely agreed-upon variable
– Important to achieve a “match” between the level of commitment, ability and institutional rigor
– High School GPA appears to be strongest predictor of degree completion
– First semester freshman GPA appears to be strongest factor in persistence to sophomore year
11
Literature
• However, some researchers posit that 75% of all dropout decisions are non-academic in nature, and three “lenses” have appeared through which persistence can be viewed
• Financial factors
• Psychological factors
• Institutional factors
12
Financial
• When controlling for various factors, aid awards appear to increase persistence for wealthier students but the effects can be less clear for lower-income students.
• Financial issues go well beyond tuition.
• Students indicate that employment is a major academic impediment, and several studies have reported a negative retention effect associated with a part-time job
13
Psychological
• Multiple studies identify a need for underrepresented students to feel a sense of “fit” on campus
• This need is difficult to measure objectively– Attendance with existing friends– Customized orientation or interaction programs– Noticeable minority population
• Family support or “cultural capital” is important• Family responsibilities, such as dependents or siblings,
interfere with academic success
14
Institutional
• Mentoring Programs– The efficacy of these programs appears weak, but there
are successful successes like Purdue’s HORIZONS program– The existing research is fairly thin
• Learning Communities– Consists of groups of students who attend scheduled
classes and structured social events together– Includes both residential and non-residential communities– Results are equivocal
15
Institutional
• Faculty-Student Interaction– Studies have noted a possible positive effect– More research is needed on this level
• Transition and Orientation Programs– This category has a large amount of research
demonstrating a positive effect.– Students indicate programs are critical to their success.
• Advising– Targeted advising for at-risk groups and freshmen is
frequently reported as desirable by all students.
16
Interventions Among Selected High Persistence Institutions
17
In a review of 45 institutions with evidence of retention improvements, several common program types emerged:
Campus-Based Retention Programs
Some observations:
– Counseling and mentoring programs (71% of programs)– Freshman-specific programming (38%)– Transition/orientation programs and early-warning
tracking systems (29%)– Learning communities (27%)– Student-faculty interaction programs and additional
academic support (24%)
18
Indiana Retention Programs
• Within Indiana, a survey of 28 public and private institutions provided some enlightening findings:
– All of the previously-noted methods are in use
– No two campuses use the same mix
– The institutions with the largest persistence issues have the most
extensive programs (IUPUI, Ivy Tech)
– Additional academic support is the most common method utilized
– Learning communities are the least common approach
19
Overview of Retention Interventions at Indiana Institutions
20Includes data from 28 of approximately 51 institutions
Recommendations
Access Is Not EnoughExpand Financial Assistance
• Should address the hidden costs of attending college
Indiana can build upon Twenty-First Century Scholars Program
• IU has expanded the program to cover all costs• Funding for this program will need to be expanded and
alumni may be a good source
21
Recommendations
More Information Is Needed• Improve data collection systems
– Similar and comparable data across systems and states.– Policy sharing (Complete College America)– Better support for research
22
Recommendations
Tailor Programs to Specific Needs
• Target At-Risk Student• Target Non-residential and 2-year Colleges
– These students face different challenges than traditional Universities
• Adopt a Comprehensive Strategy – College retention programs should be as unique as the
students.
23
24
Thank You