College Of The Redwoods Examination Of Class Scheduling A p r i l 2 0 1 0.

College Of The Redwoods

Examination Of Class Scheduling

A p r i l 2 0 1 0

Scheduling Assessment PurposeScheduling Assessment Purpose

Determine The Effectiveness Of The Class Scheduling Process Cancellations Efficiency Facility Utilization Curriculum

Scheduling Assessment ProcessScheduling Assessment Process

Phase I Interviewed Persons Relevant To The Scheduling

Process Across College Of The Redwoods Examination Of Class Schedule Data

Phase II Installation Of ClassTracks Software For

Continued Schedule Examination Training Of Key Personnel On Software


Phase III Presentation Of Class Schedule Information

Phase IV Delivery Of Detailed Reports For College

Scheduling Assessment OutcomesScheduling Assessment Outcomes

Effectiveness Of The Class Scheduling Development Process

Efficiency By Location, Division, And Discipline In Scheduling

Maximizing Utilization Of Facilities Curriculum Scheduling

Effectiveness In Offering The Course Mix Each Semester By Curriculum Area


On-Site Visit And Interviews With Personnel At College Of The Redwoods December 1, 2009

Final Data Received From College February 26, 2010/ April 14, 2010

ClassTracks Software Preliminary Training February 2 And 9, 2010

Scheduling Data Analysis Report (April 2010)

Schedule ProcessSchedule Process


Academic Calendar Set Each Department Has Similar But Unique

Processes For Developing Schedule Use Past History

“Know” What Classes Fill First “Keep In Head” What Classes Are Offered Each

Fall Or Spring Only One Area Keeps A Two-Year Schedule Of

Classes And Evaluates Past Offerings With Data


Preliminary List Of Classes Developed Full-Time Faculty Input

When Faculty Are Available To Teach Input On Classes Preferred

Adjunct Faculty Input Consistent Adjuncts In Some Areas And Their Availability

To Teach Availability Of Adjuncts To Schedule Classes Scheduled Without Faculty Assignments

Area Coordinators


Room Search Begins “The Scavenger Hunt”

Some Rooms Are Owned By Some Departments These Are Scheduled First

Some Areas Have Basically No Space And Have “Dibs” On Rooms

Schedule In These Rooms

Administrative Assistants Start Looking For Rooms And Calling In Favors

Even Having To Go Look At Rooms

Some Sections Simply Not Assigned Rooms


Schedule Entered Into Computer System Copies Circulated For Review And Proofing

Again, And Again, And Again …

Do Not Appear To Have A Formal Process For Changes During Review

Adding And Cancelling Classes Signatures For Changing, Adding, Etc.


Schedule Ready For Publication Final Proof Changes Still Being Made

Post To Web

Issues Noted In InterviewsIssues Noted In Interviews

Classroom Issues Perception Of Space Issues At Eureka Campus

Not Enough Rooms At Key Fill Times

Off-Site Locations Actually Limited On Classrooms More Efficient In Scheduling

Rooms A Major Problem All Rooms Not Created Equal Each Division Has Different Needs For Rooms

SMART Classroom Fights


Classroom Issues Room Ownership

Some Departments “Own Rooms,” Others Have “Dibs” On Rooms

AOA’s Have Knowledge About Rooms But Are Bypassed Or Have To Get On Phone And Find Rooms

No Clear Authority Over Who Has Final Room Assignment

Physical Room Inventory State Information May Not Be Correct No Easy Way To See Room Features


Input Into Scheduling Process Very Little Data Used In Developing Schedules

“Know” What Classes Fill First Difficult To Obtain Little Historical Data Available At Fingertips For

Analysis Only One Department Actually Uses Data

Concern Over Apparent Disregard Of FTES Targets In Scheduling

California Driven By FTES


Input Into Scheduling Process Little To No Input From Key Student Services

Personnel Example: Remedial And Developmental

Student Services Personnel Test And Know Numbers Disconnect Between Testing And Seats Offered Without Seats Students Cannot Enroll And Continue

Interaction With Students In Scheduling And Advising Provides Input But No Avenue For Forwarding That Input To Schedule Decision Makers


Cancellation Issues Impacts On Attainment

Students Concerned Classes Needed For Graduation Cancelled Within 3rd Day Of Registration Or After Classes Start

Impacts On Schedules AOA’s Call And Inform Students Classes Are Cancelled

(Depends On Area) Student Services Has No Direct Authority On Informing

Students Of Cancellations Students Have To Fill In Schedule


Course Availability Students Report Not Being Able To Get Classes

Needed To Graduate Or Transfer Classes Needed For Graduation Cancelled Required Class Fills Within Three Days Of

Registration Start And Another Class Not Opened Unsure What Semester “Required” Courses Will Be

Offered Programs Not Laid Out By Recommended Semester


Curriculum Scheduling Discussion Of Two-Year Schedule

One Department Does That Now, Majority Do Not

Students Cannot Get Through Curriculum In A Reasonable Time

Cannot Plan A Student’s Degree Plan With The Current System

Cannot Assure A Student Of The Class Offerings Major Impact On Recruiters And Advisors


General Education Scheduling Concern About Offering Too Many General

Education Courses And Dilution Of General Education Course Enrollees

Spread Out Too Thin Many Options For General Education Scheduling

Who Determines Best Gen Ed Options To Schedule? Which Ones Really Needed For Transfer Partners?

Departments Schedule In Isolation Of Each Other


Daily Scheduling Issues Pass Time

Chancellor Requires 10 Minute Pass Time College Has 5 Minute Pass Time Fall 2009 And Spring

2010 M/ W Blocks Are 8:30-9:55am, 10:00-11:25am, 11:30-12:55am,

1:00-2:25pm, 2:30-3:55pm, 4:00-5:25pm

Nationally 10 To 15 Minute Pass Times Solving Issue - Fall 2010 Moving To 10 Minute Pass Time

M/ W Blocks Are 8:30-9:55am, 10:05-11:30am, 11:40-1:05pm, 1:15-2:40pm, 2:50-4:15pm, 4:25-5:50pm


Daily Scheduling Issues Faculty Scheduling

Difficulty Being Scheduled Evening And Then Early Morning Next Day

College Hour Students Noted Need For A College Hour For

Meetings


More Diverse Scheduling Needed Monday/ Wednesday/ Friday Classes Needed

Miss One Day Only Miss 1/3 Of Class Not Half Friday Dead

Evening Classes – After 6PM Can Work Full-Time And Still Attend

Weekend Classes Adult Students Faculty Now Teach On Weekend

Services Not Available To Support Weekend Classes


More Diverse Scheduling Needed Online Classes

Provide More Options For Online Can Increase Load Without Attending

Course Dilution Concern About Spreading Schedule Too Thin Over

Off-Sites Goals For Sites

Who Is Responsible For Scheduling Off-Sites?


Adjunct Availability Concerns Over Availability Of Qualified

Adjuncts Difficult To Find In Off-Sites Some Have Been Employed For Years Invite Some To Not Return

Fact Or FictionFact Or Fiction

Data Analysis Will Examine These Issues Cancellation Analysis Efficiency Analysis Utilization Analysis Curriculum Analysis

Data Used For AnalysisData Used For Analysis

Data RequirementsData Requirements

Fall 2006 To Spring 2010 Detailed Section Information By Semester

Class Title, Division, Class Subject, Class Number, Site, Class ID, Class Status, Room Description, Building Name, Room Cap, Instructor, Meeting Days, Start Date, End Date, Start Time, End Time, Credit Hours, Enrollment, Enrollment Cap, Instructor Contact Hours, Component Code, Instructor Class Description, Program Type, Credit/ Noncredit, Instructor Mode, Instructor Load, Instructor ID, Section Revenue, Section Expense, Semester, Year, Unique Course Identifier, Cross-Listed Courses, Cancel Date, Class Enrollment Status


Fall 2006 To Spring 2010 Semesters Census And End Of Semester Data Files Were Sent In csv Formats Room Capacities Were An Issue

College Corrected Some Used The State Report For Capacities For Some Still Not Totally Accurate


Fall 2006 To Spring 2010 Semesters Section Data Loaded Into ClassTracks For

Analysis Provides Semester And Multi-Semester Reports

Reports Will Be Made Available In Final Report

Location, Division, And Discipline

Cancellation AnalysisCancellation Analysis

(See Appendix A)(See Appendix A)


Cancellations Impact On Room Availability Impact On Students Building Schedules Impact On Enrollments Impact On Student Services Personnel Impact On Academic Services


Examined Cancellation Rates For Fall 2006 To Spring 2010 Location

Site + Off-Site For Location

Division Discipline Course Section

Cancellation – CollegeCancellation – College

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA2006

WI2007

SP2007

SU2007

FA2007

WI2008

SP2008

SU2008

FA2008

WI2009

SP2009

SU2009

FA2009

SP2010

Per

cent

Sec

tions

Can

celle

d

College Of The Redwoods

Most Colleges Fall In This Range

Cancellation By SiteCancellation By Site

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA2006

WI2007

SP2007

SU2007

FA2007

WI2008

SP2008

SU2008

FA2008

WI2009

SP2009

SU2009

FA2009

SP2010

Per

cent

Sec

tions

Can

celle

d

ARC DN+DNOC EDTN EKA EOC KT MC+MCO MCKL VC


Cancellation By DivisionCancellation By Division

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA2006

WI2007

SP2007

SU2007

FA2007

WI2008

SP2008

SU2008

FA2008

WI2009

SP2009

SU2009

FA2009

SP2010

Per

cent

Sec

tions

Can

celle

d

ALSS ATHPE BTECH HCMM HOCC MSE PSC SLSS


Cancellation By DivisionCancellation By Division

Fall 2009 SLSS (35.6%) BTECH (19.1%) ALSS (12.7%) PSC (12.5%) HCMM (7.7%) MSE (7.1%) ATHPE (2.8%) HOCC (2.4%)

Fall 2008 SLSS (21.6%) MSE (19.0%) ATHPE (15.2%) BTECH (9.6%) HCMM (8.1%) PSC (7.7%) HOCC (2.8%) ALSS (2.6%)

Cancellation By CourseCancellation By Course

Review Cancellations By Course Number Of Sections Offered Fall 2006 To

Spring 2010 Number Sections Active Number Sections Cancelled

Percent Sections Offered By Courses Active And Cancelled

Example

Cancellation By CourseCancellation By Course

Course CancellationsCourse Cancellations FA 2005 To SPR 2010 FA 2005 To SPR 2010

39 Courses Had 100% Of

Sections Cancelled

Courses 100% CancelledCourses 100% Cancelled

AG 11: Sustainable Animal Production AJ 88B: Basic Academy Preparation ART 20: Illustration ART 47: Etching Techniques ASTRO 99A: Current Issues in Astro BT 63: Desktop Publishing Application BT 88: Experimental Crse in Bus Tech BUS 33: International Business BUS 81A: Individual Income Tax Law BUS 81B: Corp Partn Income Tax Law BUS 82L: Volunteer Income Tax Assist

CINE 8: Screenwriting CR 119P: Reporting Procedures

Research CR 119R: CSR-RPR Examination

review DHET 166: Theory Op of Ag Equip DHET 40: Ind Study Diesel Heavy

Equip DM 75B: 2-D Animation II DT 63: Mechanical Design Drafting DT 81: 3-D Character Modeling Anim ECE 10LB4: Fld Plcmnt Schl-Age Chld

Care ECE 15: School-Age Children In Child

Care ENGL 10: Intro to Classical Literature

Courses 100% CancelledCourses 100% Cancelled

ENGR 99: Selected Topics in Engineering

FRNC 8A: Elem Conversational French I

GEOL 130G: Coastal Geology GEOL 99: Selected Topics in Geology GEOL 99B: Geology of Centerville

Scotia GERM 11A: Begin Conversational

German I GS 1: College Success HRC 27: Do Not Use JPN 8A: Elem Convers Japanese I NAS 13: Native Cultures NW

California NR 68: Introduction to ARCGIS

PE 14: Defensive Tactics PE 43: Aquatic Fitness PE 60: Fndtns of Recreational

Studies PSYCH 20: Biological Psychology RE 12: Real Estate Law WT 67: Special Welding Laboratory

Cancellation By SectionCancellation By Section

Review Cancellations By Section And Times By Course Sections Offered Fall 2006 To Spring 2010

Times Of Sections Offered Percent Fill Rate

Students Enrolled By Class Cap (Academic, Not Room Cap)

Cancellations

Example

BT 158BT 158

Two Degree Impacts:BT AS Office Professional

BUS Certificate Of Achievement, Medical Office Business Skills (Mendocino)

Cancellation Dates Fall 2009Cancellation Dates Fall 2009

01/06/10

10/01/09

09/22/09

09/17/09

09/10/09

08/31/09

08/24/09

08/20/09

08/18/09

08/14/09

08/12/09

08/10/09

08/06/09

07/30/09

07/28/09

07/24/09

07/22/09

07/20/09

07/15/09

07/13/09

07/09/09

06/08/09

05/20/09

05/05/09

03/26/09

Da

tes

2520151050

Sections Cancelled

Fall 2009 Cancellations By Date

August 27, 2009 First Day Of Classes

172 Total Sections Cancelled

Cancellation Dates Spring 2010Cancellation Dates Spring 2010

02/12/10

01/26/10

01/19/10

01/12/10

01/07/10

12/30/09

12/17/09

12/15/09

11/24/09

11/17/09

11/12/09

11/09/09

11/05/09

11/03/09

10/22/09

10/09/09

10/06/09

10/01/09

09/29/09

Da

tes

806040200

Sections

Spring 2010 Cancellation Dates

January 16, 2010 First Day Of Classes

136 Total Sections Cancelled

RecommendationsRecommendations

Cancellation Rate For Credit For College Should Be Below 10%

Stop Offering Cancelled Sections Next Semester If Single Section Of Course

Wait At Least A Semester If Cancelled Last Two Semesters, Wait A Year

If Multiple Sections Of Course Evaluate Course Efficiency


College Will Provide Easy-To-Use Trend Information For Scheduling Data Has Been Limited Trend Data Needed On A By-Section Basis

During The Planning Process


Develop A Pre-Schedule Conference For Input Early In The Schedule Development Process,

Conduct A Scheduling Conference Between Department Chairs And Student Services Personnel

Goal Is To Provide Input Into The Schedule Development Process

New Courses Needed, Priorities For Scheduling, Etc.


Review The Courses With High Cancellation Rates (50%+) Utilize The Course Status Report

Review Day Of Week And Time For Courses

Cancellations Impact Rooms Blocking Rooms During Key Times

Large Percent Cancelled Were Between 8am And Noon

Unless Rooms Reassigned For Late Start, Lose Utilization For Room And Buildings


Cancellations Impact Curriculum If Course Is Continually Cancelled, Impacts

Students’ Ability To Complete Curriculum Adjust Curriculum

Some Courses May Need To Be Removed If They Are Low Fill And Cancel Regularly

Impacts Efficiency Determine If Fewer Sections Are Needed In

Upcoming Schedule Spreading Fewer Students In Classes

Efficiency AnalysisEfficiency Analysis

(See Appendix B)


Examined Sections Offered Across Colleges Fall 2006 To Spring 2010 Concentrated On Fall And Spring Winter And Summer Data Is Available

Goal Is To Minimize Number Of Sections While Increasing Enrollments In Each Section Increasing Efficiency


Efficiency Defined By Fill Rate Number Of Students Divided By Class Cap

Student Enrollment Cap, Not Physical Room Capacity

Also Has An Impact On Room Usage Class Cap Substantially Lower Than Physical

Room Capacity

Efficiency Rates – CollegeEfficiency Rates – College

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA2006

WI2007

SP2007

SU2007

FA2007

WI2008

SP2008

SU2008

FA2008

WI2009

SP2009

SU2009

FA2009

SP2010

Percent Seats Filled CENSUS Average Course Size CENSUS


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA2006

WI2007

SP2007

SU2007

FA2007

WI2008

SP2008

SU2008

FA2008

WI2009

SP2009

SU2009

FA2009

SP2010

Percent Seats Filled END Average Course Size END


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA2006

WI2007

SP2007

SU2007

FA2007

WI2008

SP2008

SU2008

FA2008

WI2009

SP2009

SU2009

FA2009

SP2010

Percent Seats Filled END Average Course Size END

Percent Seats Filled CENSUS Average Course Size CENSUS


Efficiency Rates By Site (Census)Efficiency Rates By Site (Census)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA 2009 SP 2010

Per

cen

t S

eats

Fil

led

ARC DN+DNOC EDTN EKA EOC KT MC+MCO MCKL VC SH

*Some EOC And PSC SP 2010 Classes Not Yet Held

Efficiency Rates By Division (Census)Efficiency Rates By Division (Census)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

FA 2009 SP 2010

Per

cent

Sea

ts F

illed

ALSS ATHPE BTECH HCMM HOCC MSE PSC SLSS Column 9

*PSC SP 2010 Classes Not Yet Held

Discipline Efficiency Fall 2009Discipline Efficiency Fall 2009

FT 100.00% MA 95.00% WAT 95.00% WT 93.00% SPCH 92.10% LVN 90.80% AJ 90.40% DA 89.50% BIOL 88.50% SNLAN 87.00% CET 86.70%

HO 85.60% GEOL 85.20% AT 85.00% FRNC 82.90% CT 82.70% ASTRO 82.50% CHEM 81.80% HIST 77.50% PSYCH 77.20% ART 77.10% MATH 76.90%


BT 76.10% ENGL 76.00% SPAN 76.00% HE 75.30% OCEAN 75.30% NURS 74.80% FNR 73.60% JPN 73.20% CIS 73.10% READ 73.00% PHIL 72.60%

METEO 72.50% ENVSC 71.60% MT 71.10% POLSC 70.60% JOURN 70.00% ECE 69.80% DRAMA 68.30% ANTH 67.20% IT 65.70% SOC 65.70% ADCT 65.50%


CINE 64.90% PE 64.90% DM 64.60% MUS 64.40% LIBR 64.10% PHYS 63.50% GS 61.00% GERM 60.70% GEOG 60.20% NAS 59.50% HRC 58.10%

AG 55.40% ECON 54.90% BUS 54.80% GUID 52.40% RE 52.00% DHET 46.40% DT 46.30% DANCE 45.50% ENGR 37.60% PHYSC 32.50% CE 13.30%

ECON 1 – FA 2009ECON 1 – FA 2009

ART 17 - Example Fall 2009ART 17 - Example Fall 2009

Art 17 – 8 Sections Active, 168 Students Enrolled EKA CampusMax Students Of 30 Per Section

6 Sections Of 30 Will Accommodate Enrollment – Gain At Least One Room

BUS – Course Report ExampleBUS – Course Report Example

BUS 10 – Section Report ExampleBUS 10 – Section Report Example

Issues To AddressIssues To Address

Two Issues Impacting Efficiency One Course, One Section Issue Courses With Multiple Sections

Number Of Sections Fall 2009Number Of Sections Fall 2009

0

50

100

150

200

250

Fall 2009

Courses Offered With 1 Section Courses Offered With 2 Sections

Courses Offered With 3 To 5 Sections Courses Offered With 6 Or More Sections

Efficiency 44%

Efficiency 63% Efficiency 68%

Efficiency 69%


Two Issues Impacting Efficiency One Course, One Section Issue

Courses With Less Than 70% Fill Should Be Offered Less Often – Not Every Semester

Examine Impact On Curriculum

Courses With Multiple Sections Courses With Less Than 80% Examined For

Fewer Sections Needed Must Take Locations And Time Frames Into

Account


Issues Solved By Improving Efficiency Higher Fill Rate, More Efficient Less Reliance On Adjuncts

Cited As A Major Issue

Faculty Availability For New Program Development

More Room Capacity Frees Up A Room, Potentially At A Key Fill Time


Examine Courses With Less Than 70% Seats Filled Higher Fill Rate, More Efficient One Section May Be Needed Rather Than Two

Savings On Faculty Cost Can Reallocate Faculty To New Program Offering

Or Reduce Adjunct Cost Frees Up A Room, Potentially At A Key Fill Time

Utilization AnalysisUtilization Analysis

(See Appendix C)

Classroom UtilizationClassroom Utilization

Issue To Address Is Whether The College Is Completely Full With No Excess Capacity Number Of Seats Available Per Hour Versus

Students Limited Room Capacity Information Available

Number Of Rooms Used And Hours Rooms Used Per Week

Fall 2006 To Spring 2010 Examined

Classroom Utilization All CollegeClassroom Utilization All College

Percent Seats Filled By Day

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday

Spring 2009 % % % % % %Fall 2008 % % % % % %Spring 2008 % % % % % %Fall 2007 % % % % % %Spring 2007 % % % % % %Fall 2006 % % % % % %Spring 2006 % % % % % %Fall 2005 % % % % % %

Calculated as students divided by room capacity – could not calculate since room capacities were not included in the data

Room UsageRoom Usage Fall 2009

Percent Rooms Used Per Hour (Census) Eureka

On-Campus Only

Other Locations On-Campus Only

Fall 2009 EKA (89 Rooms)Fall 2009 EKA (89 Rooms)

Time

Rooms used per day per hour. Percent utilization is based on the number of classroom hours used each day.Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday

Rooms % Util Rooms % Util Rooms % Util Rooms % Util Rooms % Util Rooms % Util Rooms % Util

06:00-07:00 0 0.0% 2 2.2% 3 3.4% 2 2.2% 2 2.2% 1 1.1% 0 0.0%

07:00-08:00 0 0.0% 3 3.4% 4 4.5% 2 2.2% 3 3.4% 1 1.1% 0 0.0%

08:00-09:00 1 1.1% 41 46.1% 38 42.7% 41 46.1% 36 40.4% 21 23.6% 5 5.6%

09:00-10:00 2 2.2% 47 52.8% 45 50.6% 47 52.8% 44 49.4% 32 36.0% 11 12.4%

10:00-11:00 2 2.2% 57 64.0% 59 66.3% 57 64.0% 58 65.2% 38 42.7% 14 15.7%

11:00-12:00 3 3.4% 61 68.5% 67 75.3% 61 68.5% 66 74.2% 36 40.4% 15 16.9%

12:00-13:00 2 2.2% 54 60.7% 58 65.2% 54 60.7% 56 62.9% 24 27.0% 16 18.0%

13:00-14:00 3 3.4% 54 60.7% 49 55.1% 56 62.9% 49 55.1% 27 30.3% 14 15.7%

14:00-15:00 3 3.4% 58 65.2% 55 61.8% 63 70.8% 57 64.0% 27 30.3% 14 15.7%

15:00-16:00 2 2.2% 46 51.7% 47 52.8% 50 56.2% 50 56.2% 23 25.8% 13 14.6%

16:00-17:00 2 2.2% 33 37.1% 34 38.2% 33 37.1% 36 40.4% 10 11.2% 8 9.0%

17:00-18:00 0 0.0% 31 34.8% 24 27.0% 29 32.6% 25 28.1% 3 3.4% 1 1.1%

18:00-19:00 0 0.0% 44 49.4% 48 53.9% 46 51.7% 46 51.7% 7 7.9% 0 0.0%

19:00-20:00 0 0.0% 44 49.4% 49 55.1% 47 52.8% 47 52.8% 7 7.9% 0 0.0%

20:00-21:00 0 0.0% 28 31.5% 33 37.1% 33 37.1% 31 34.8% 5 5.6% 0 0.0%

21:00-22:00 0 0.0% 11 12.4% 15 16.9% 16 18.0% 15 16.9% 5 5.6% 1 1.1%

22:00-23:00 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 3 3.4% 1 1.1% 2 2.2% 1 1.1% 1 1.1%

23:00-24:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Fall 2009 ARC (5 Rooms)Fall 2009 ARC (5 Rooms)

Time



08:00-09:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

09:00-10:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

10:00-11:00 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%

11:00-12:00 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%

12:00-13:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0%

13:00-14:00 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 4 80.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%

14:00-15:00 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 4 80.0% 4 80.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0%

15:00-16:00 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 4 80.0% 4 80.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0%

16:00-17:00 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0%

17:00-18:00 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

18:00-19:00 0 0.0% 4 80.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

19:00-20:00 0 0.0% 4 80.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

20:00-21:00 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

21:00-22:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Fall 2009 DN (13 Rooms)Fall 2009 DN (13 Rooms)

Time



06:00-07:00 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%

07:00-08:00 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%

08:00-09:00 0 0.0% 8 61.5% 6 46.2% 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 4 30.8% 0 0.0%

09:00-10:00 1 7.7% 9 69.2% 6 46.2% 9 69.2% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 1 7.7%

10:00-11:00 1 7.7% 9 69.2% 7 53.8% 8 61.5% 6 46.2% 4 30.8% 1 7.7%

11:00-12:00 1 7.7% 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 4 30.8% 1 7.7%

12:00-13:00 1 7.7% 4 30.8% 3 23.1% 3 23.1% 3 23.1% 5 38.5% 1 7.7%

13:00-14:00 1 7.7% 8 61.5% 9 69.2% 9 69.2% 9 69.2% 4 30.8% 1 7.7%

14:00-15:00 1 7.7% 8 61.5% 10 76.9% 8 61.5% 10 76.9% 3 23.1% 1 7.7%

15:00-16:00 1 7.7% 9 69.2% 7 53.8% 10 76.9% 7 53.8% 3 23.1% 1 7.7%

16:00-17:00 1 7.7% 6 46.2% 5 38.5% 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 3 23.1% 1 7.7%

17:00-18:00 0 0.0% 8 61.5% 8 61.5% 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%

18:00-19:00 0 0.0% 9 69.2% 9 69.2% 8 61.5% 7 53.8% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%

19:00-20:00 0 0.0% 9 69.2% 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 7 53.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

20:00-21:00 0 0.0% 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 4 30.8% 6 46.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

21:00-22:00 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 2 15.4% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Fall 2009 EDTN (6 Rooms)Fall 2009 EDTN (6 Rooms)

Time



08:00-09:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 4 66.7%

09:00-10:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 5 83.3%

10:00-11:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 5 83.3%

11:00-12:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 5 83.3%

12:00-13:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 5 83.3%

13:00-14:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 3 50.0% 4 66.7%

14:00-15:00 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 4 66.7% 3 50.0% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 4 66.7%

15:00-16:00 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 4 66.7%

16:00-17:00 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 2 33.3%

17:00-18:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

18:00-19:00 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 4 66.7% 5 83.3% 4 66.7% 3 50.0% 0 0.0%

19:00-20:00 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 4 66.7% 5 83.3% 4 66.7% 3 50.0% 0 0.0%

20:00-21:00 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 0 0.0%

21:00-22:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 0 0.0%

Fall 2009 KT (6 Rooms)Fall 2009 KT (6 Rooms)

Time



08:00-09:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

09:00-10:00 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

10:00-11:00 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

11:00-12:00 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

12:00-13:00 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

13:00-14:00 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

14:00-15:00 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

15:00-16:00 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

16:00-17:00 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

17:00-18:00 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 4 66.7% 5 83.3% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

18:00-19:00 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 3 50.0% 6 100.0% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

19:00-20:00 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 1 16.7% 6 100.0% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

20:00-21:00 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

21:00-22:00 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

22:00-23:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Fall 2009 MCKL (5 Rooms)Fall 2009 MCKL (5 Rooms)

Time



08:00-09:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0%

09:00-10:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0%

10:00-11:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0%

11:00-12:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0%

12:00-13:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0%

13:00-14:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

14:00-15:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

15:00-16:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

16:00-17:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

17:00-18:00 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

18:00-19:00 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 5 100.0% 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

19:00-20:00 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 5 100.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

20:00-21:00 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

21:00-22:00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Fall 2009 MC (13 Rooms)Fall 2009 MC (13 Rooms)

Time



08:00-09:00 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%

09:00-10:00 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 3 23.1% 8 61.5% 3 23.1%

10:00-11:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 7 53.8% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 8 61.5% 3 23.1%

11:00-12:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 7 53.8% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 8 61.5% 3 23.1%

12:00-13:00 0 0.0% 3 23.1% 6 46.2% 3 23.1% 4 30.8% 8 61.5% 3 23.1%

13:00-14:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 4 30.8% 4 30.8% 3 23.1%

14:00-15:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 4 30.8% 4 30.8% 3 23.1%

15:00-16:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 6 46.2% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 4 30.8% 3 23.1%

16:00-17:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 5 38.5% 5 38.5% 4 30.8% 4 30.8% 2 15.4%

17:00-18:00 0 0.0% 3 23.1% 3 23.1% 3 23.1% 2 15.4% 1 7.7% 1 7.7%

18:00-19:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 8 61.5% 7 53.8% 7 53.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

19:00-20:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 8 61.5% 7 53.8% 7 53.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

20:00-21:00 0 0.0% 6 46.2% 7 53.8% 7 53.8% 6 46.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

21:00-22:00 0 0.0% 3 23.1% 6 46.2% 4 30.8% 5 38.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%


Designate A Campus Scheduler Responsible For Room Assignments

Has Final Authority For Assignments Reviews All Room Assignments And Locations Reviews Schedule For Errors

Review Of Space Utilization Physical Room Inventory

Departments Have Seniority For Rooms But Not Ownership

Recommendation Recommendation

Scheduler Works With Physical Facility Department And State Correct Room Capacities Impact On Potential Funding For Space

Designate Rooms For Meeting Length Different Credit Courses Have To Meet In Varying

Time Blocks For Example, Assign 4 Credit Classes To Specific Rooms

Minimizes The Time Room Is Empty

Room Utilization By SectionRoom Utilization By Section

324

64

82

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Fall 2009

Room Capacity Greater Than Class Cap Room Capacity = Class Cap

Room Capacity Less Than Class Cap


Conduct A Physical Room Capacity, Merge Into Data, And Assess Class Caps Versus Room Capacity Issue To Address Is Whether The Rooms

Are Being Assigned Correctly Room Ownership May Impact Maximizing

Utilization Of Room


Example Class Cap 20 In A Room That Physically Holds

35 People Reallocate Room To Another Class

This Removes Up To 15 Seats Per Hour During High Fill Times

20 Seat Enrollment Cap In A Room Of 35 10 Sections Can Remove 150 Seats Per Time Slot


Movement Has Been To Five-Day Schedules MWF, MW, TTh Explore Options For College – Friday Low

Utilization

Curriculum AnalysisCurriculum Analysis

(See Appendix D)

Curriculum IssuesCurriculum Issues

Completion Issues Whether All Courses Are Offered For Degree

Programs Day, Evening, Weekend Programming

Input Curriculum From Current Catalog Catalog Lists Degrees Offered By Sites

Page 40 And 41

Examined To Determine Whether Students Could Have Completed In Last Four Year

Program AnalysisProgram Analysis

72

1216

28

813

0

20

40

60

80

100

EKA DN MC

Total Academic Awards Programs With Courses Missing Last Four Years

BUS Certificate – Desktop PublishingBUS Certificate – Desktop Publishing

BT 63, BT 162, BUS 152 MissingEvening Maybe? Not Morning

Desktop Publishing – Fall 2009Desktop Publishing – Fall 2009

Desktop Publishing – Spring 2010Desktop Publishing – Spring 2010


37% Of Programs Listed In Catalog Could Not Be Completed In Last Four Years Curriculum Needs To Be Examined And Either

Changed Or Courses Taught Timing Of Courses

Courses In Major Area Are Offered All Over Time Frames

No Real Planning Of When Degree Is Offered During Day No Coordination Between Departments


Develop Curriculum Sheets For Degrees Outline Recommended Semesters Courses

Should Be Taken Curriculum Sheets Should Be Available

Online


Plan Schedule For Two Years Annual Schedule Master Examine Curriculum Offerings Plan Curriculum Work With Student Services Communicate To Students


Ensure All Programming For Degrees Will Be Offered In Reasonable Time Frame

Define All Programs Which Can Be Offered Day, Evening Or Online Market These Programs Develop Accelerated Classes For These

Programs


General Education College May Be Offering Too Many General

Education Courses Spreads Enrollments Out Too Thin Across Too

Many Courses

Gen Ed C. Humanities – ENGL 18Gen Ed C. Humanities – ENGL 18

ENGL 18ENGL 18

Gen Eds Offered By CollegeGen Eds Offered By College

6 6

30 2833 31

35 35

49

39

5 5

0

20

40

60

80

100

Courses Offered By College

CSU Gen Eds A. Communication

CSU Gen Eds B. Scientific InquiryAnd Quanitative Reasoning

CSU Gen Eds C. Arts AndHumanities

CSU Gen Eds D. Social Sciences

CSU Gen Eds E. LifelongLearning

Gen Ed A. Natural Science

Gen Ed B. Social Science

Gen Ed C. Humanities

Gend Ed D. Language AndRationality

Gen Eds – Liberal ArtsGen Eds – Liberal Arts

3

7

0

0

0

2

7

0

9

43

9

30

43

5

21

57

0 20 40 60 80 100

AOE Agriculture

AOE Behavioral And Social Science

AOE Business

AOE Fine Arts

AOE Humanities And Communications

AOE Math

AOE Science

AOE Science Education

Core Courses

Additional Courses


Appoint A Faculty Committee Examine All General Education

Components Being Offered For CSU And UC Transfer

Options For Liberal Arts Area Of Emphasis (AOE) Realistic Or Not?

Online DeliveryOnline Delivery

10611015

73 66

462 491

47 46

-150

100

350

600

850

1,100

Fall 2009 Spring 2010

Total Sections Online Sections Total Courses Online Courses

Online DeliveryOnline Delivery

Expect Minimum Of 15% Of Sections Online 7% In Fall 2009 6.5% In Spring 2010 Need To Expand The Number Of Online

Sections Define Courses Needed For Online

Liberal Arts Degree


Explore Additional Alternative Delivery Formats Internet Courses

iPod, Internet Streaming

Blended/ Hybrid Courses Lecture And Online


Explore Additional Alternative Delivery Formats Fast Track/ Accelerated Program

Accelerated Program To Obtain A Degree, Not Just Classes Offered

Depending On The Program, Students Can Complete A Degree By Attending One Class Meeting Per Week Over An Approximate 2 To 2-1/2 Year Period

QUESTIONS?

College Of The Redwoods Examination Of Class Scheduling A p r i l 2 0 1 0.

Documents

Transcript of College Of The Redwoods Examination Of Class Scheduling A p r i l 2 0 1 0.