Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution...

21
Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology- enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education Beat A. Schwendimann, Ph.D. UC Berkeley/ The University of Sydney CSCL 2013

Transcript of Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution...

Page 1: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Beat A. Schwendimann, Ph.D.

UC Berkeley/ The University of Sydney

CSCL 2013

Page 2: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Time in the science classroom is short and precious

On average, 3-10 hours on evolution (Berkman 2008)

Page 3: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

“Evolutionary theory is probably oneof the most

counterintuitive ideas the human mind has encountered, so far.”

Evans (2008)

Page 4: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Repertoire of alternative ideas

Page 5: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Knowledge Integration

Page 6: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Genotype - Phenotype

Genotype Phenotype?

Page 7: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Knowledge Integration Map (KIM)

Page 8: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Two Treatment Groups

Generation

Critique

Page 9: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Gene Pool Explorer

Page 10: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Classroom Implementation

9th/10th grade science classroom93 students5-6 hours

Page 11: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Knowledge Integration ScoreSample question: What changes occur gradually over time in groups of finches that live in different environments?

KI score Sample answer

No answer 0 None

Off-task 1 I don’t know

Incorrect 2 Finches develop new beaks because they need to adapt to a new environment.

Partially correct 3 Finches inherit traits from their parents.

Basic correct 4 Finches have differently shaped beaks that give them different chances to survive natural selection.

Complex correct 5 Natural selection causes those finches with helpful mutations to their beaks to be more genetically fit and adapt to the environment better. Therefore, the finches with the beaks adapted to their environment are more likely to reproduce and the trait gradually becomes dominant in the group.

Page 12: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Knowledge Integration Gains

Page 13: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Using Normative Evolution Ideas

0=Non-normative ideas; 1=partial; 2=normative ideas

Page 14: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Student Example: Pre-Test

Page 15: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Student Example: Post-Test

Page 16: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

KIM cross-link changes

Page 17: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

KIM idea “Mutation”

Page 18: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Time spent on KIM tasks

Page 19: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Findings

• KIM critique tasks took only half the amount of time than the KIM generation tasks

• Knowledge Integration Maps can elicit and facilitate cross-connections between genotype and genotype ideas

• Both treatment groups showed similar knowledge integration pre-posttest gains

Page 21: Collaboratively generating and critiquing technology-enhanced concept maps to improve evolution education

Questions?