Collaborative research - the EPAD · 2016-10-28 · Pieter Jelle Visser (VU-VUmc) Gerald Luscan...
Transcript of Collaborative research - the EPAD · 2016-10-28 · Pieter Jelle Visser (VU-VUmc) Gerald Luscan...
Collaborative research - the EPAD
(European Prevention of Alzheimer’s
Dementia) Project
Prof Craig RitchieDirector: Centre for Dementia Prevention
University of Edinburgh
NHS Research Scotland Annual Conference
Glasgow: 26th October 2016
Presentation Summary
• An (overdue) ‘paradigm shift’
– “Alzheimer’s Disease is a condition of midlife
presenting as Alzheimer’s dementia in late life”1
• European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia
(EPAD) Project2
1: Ritchie K, Ritchie CW et al. Does late onset Alzheimer's Disease really begin in mid-life.
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions. 2015; 1(2):122–130
2: Ritchie CW et al. The European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) Consortium: A
platform to enable the secondary prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia through improved Proof of
Concept Trials. Lancet Psychiatry 2016 Feb;3(2):179-86
Biomarkers and Alzheimer’s Disease
Biomarkers and Alzheimer’s Disease
• Amyloid Pathology
• Tau Pathology
• Cerebrovascular Changes
• a-synuclein
• Blood Brain Barrier Integrity
• Glial activation and inflammation
• Oxidative stress
• Mitochondrial dysfunction
• Synaptic dysfunction
• Metal dyshomeostasis
• Apoptosis
• Insulin resistance
• mTOR signalling
• b-HSD function
PREVENTION PREMISED ON
UNDERSTANDING DISEASE BEFORE
DEMENTIA
SECONDARY PREVENTIONPRIMARY
PREVENTION
PREVENTION PREMISED ON UNDERSTANDING DISEASE BEFORE DEMENTIA
Secondary Prevention of Dementia
The three steps to achieve secondary prevention:
•STEP 1: Identifying the ‘at risk’ person– Risk factors (fixed and modifiable)
– Cognitive profile (not ‘symptoms’)
– Biomarker evidence of disease
– Changes in these over time
Can we develop an accurate prediction algorithm/score?
Secondary Prevention of Dementia
The three steps to achieve secondary prevention:
• STEP 2: Tailoring treatment– Reducing modifiable risk factors
– Enhancing resilience
– Disease course modification through specific drug intervention(s)
Secondary Prevention of Dementia
The three steps to achieve secondary prevention:
STEP 3: Measuring success
– Individual’s probability status reduces• Cognition improves
• Biomarkers normalise
• Risk of dementia decreases
Ongoing clinical trials in Alzheimer disease (AD)
β amyloid
† Currently approved for AD treatment
Tau
Cholinergics
Others
Mangialasche , Kivipelto et al, modified 2013 from Lancet Neurology, 2010
Aß production
Aß clearance
Aß aggregation
More than 200 drug
development failures in
the last 30 yearsSchneider Mangialasche
Kivipelto et al., JIM 2014
WRONG METHODOLOGY
– High Screen Failure
WRONG POPULATION
– Target population pre-clinical
WRONG OUTCOMES
– Outcome measures (biological and clinical) need to
track relevant change
WRONG ANALYTICAL APPROACH
– No interim decision points for adaptation
The Problem Statement:
EPAD Consortium Developed
• €64M+ Funding from IMI
• Commenced January 2015
• Managed and Sponsored by University of Edinburgh
“The European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia
(EPAD) project aims to develop an infrastructure
that efficiently enables the undertaking of adaptive,
multi-arm Proof of Concept studies for early and
accurate decisions on the ongoing development of
drug candidates or drug combinations for the
secondary prevention of Alzheimer’s dementia”.
European Prevention of
Alzheimer’s Dementia (EPAD)
1
4
Stepped Approach
Define criteria for identifying AD pathology early in the course ofdisease in people who have no or minimal symptoms.
EPAD Register: JANUARY 2016
– Identifying these individuals from existing population and clinical cohorts orregisters.
EPAD Cohort: MAY 2016 (n=42)
– Developing a large longitudinal cohort study to ease identification for trialinclusion, provide trial run-in data and generate high quality data for updatingAD disease models, including defining risk for developing AD and evaluatingefficacy.
EPAD Trial: Q4 2017
– Establishing a protocol and infrastructure for a standing, double-blind, adaptive,proof-of-concept clinical trial for secondary prevention of AD.
IMI Expert Panel Hearing, 7 October 2014
This is EPAD!!
15
WP 5-8: Supporting Work Packages
The E
PAD
Deliv
ery
Clu
ster
From Parent Cohort to PoC
16
The EPAD PoC Trial (n=1,500)
17
Allows early decisions on progression to longer term clinical outcomes by impact onpre-defined and target-specific intermediary phenotype.
Scandinavian Collaborations
Partner:
GEDOC and Miia Kivipelto/ Laura
SNAC-K Fratiglioni
External partners:
FINGER Miia Kivipelto
CAIDE Miia Kivipelto
DDRC Steen Hasselbalch
Register Oslo cohort Nenad Bogdanovic
Benelux Collaborations
Partner:
Amsterdam Philip Scheltens
External partner:
Antwerp Sebastian Engelborghs
French Collaborations
Partner:
Toulouse Bruno Vellas
External partners:
Bordeaux Dijon
Lille Limoges
Lyon Marseille
Montpellier Nancy
Nantes Paris -Broca
Paris Sud Paris Nord
Rennes Strasbourg
Spanish and Portugese Collaborations
Partner
ALFA (BBRC)/IDIBAPS José Luis Molinuevo
External partners
CITA Pablo Martínez-Lage
Fundacion Reina Sofia Miguel Medina
Sant Pau Alberto Lleó
Coimbra Catarina Oliveira
Lisbon Alexandre de Mendonça
Swiss Collaborations
Partner:
Geneva Panteleimon
Giannakopoulos
External partners:
Zurich Christoph Hock/
Anton Gietl
Lausanne cohort 65+ Brigitte Santos-
Eggimann
Bus Sante Idris Guessous
MentDis_ICF65+ Alessandra Canuto
Colaus/PsyCoLaus Martin Preisig
Italian Collaborations
Partner:
ADWIBO Brescia Giovanni B Frisoni/
Cristina Muscio
External partners:
InChianti Luigi Ferrucci
ILSA Emanuele Scafato
UK and Irish Collaborations
Partners:
PREVENT Craig Ritchie
Generation Scotland David Porteous
UK Biobank Cathie Sudlow
DCR Simon Lovestone
Numerous DPUK Cohorts
Potentially NICOLA and TILDA from NI &Eire
EPAD is a massive and ambitious EU collaboration led
from Scotland.
The driving force for EPAD was that multiple design,
scientific and delivery features of AD trials needed a
reboot…
Recruitment methodology is ambitious, costly and
innovative BUT…..
If successful will have major impact on delivering more
therapies more quickly to prevent dementia
Conclusions
National Leads
Ritchie/Gallacher - UK & Ireland
Miia Kivipelto - Scandinavia
José Luis Molinuevo – Spain/Portugal
Philip Scheltens - Benelux
Giovanni Frisoni - Switzerland/Italy
Bruno Vellas - France
Acknowledgements
Work Package Leads
WP1Simon Lovestone (UOXF)
Andrew Satlin (Eisai)
Gary Romano (JPNV)
WP2Adrian Mander (MRC)
Shobha Dhadda (Eisai)
Scott Berry (BERRY)
Kristian Windfeld (Lundbeck)
WP3Pieter Jelle Visser (VU-VUmc)
Gerald Luscan (Pfizer)
WP4Craig Ritchie (UEDIN)
Catherine Debove (BI)
Miia Kivipelto (KI)
Mila Etropolski (JPNV)
WP5Carlos Díaz (SYNAPSE)
Serge Van der Geyten (JPNV)
WP6Jean Georges (AE)
Sean Knox (NOV)
WP7José Luis Molinuevo (BBRC)
Frank Tennigkeit (UCB)
Saira Ramasastry (SYNAPSE)
WP8Edo Richard (RUMC)
Luc Truyen (JPNV)
Carol Brayne (UCAM)
Shirlene Badger (UCAM
Executive Committee & PMO
Serge Van der Geyten (JPNV)
Luc Truyen (JPNV)
Andrew Satlin (Eisai)
Craig Ritchie (UEDIN)
Simon Lovestone (UOXF)
José Luis Molinuevo (BBRC)
Carlos Díaz (Project Manager)
Sandra Pla (member of PMO)
Lennert Steukers (member of PMO)
Mila Eltropolski (JPNV – member of PMO)
Judi Syson (UEDIN – member of PMO)
The research leading to these results has received support
from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking
under grant agreement n° 115736, resources of which are
composed of financial contribution from the European
Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)
and EFPIA companies’ in kind contribution.
Acknowledgment