cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

7
Cold Ironing BP’s Alaskan Class Tankers at BP’s Berth 121 in the Port of Long Beach Part 2 Presenter – Craig Smith

Transcript of cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

Page 1: cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

Cold Ironing BP’s Alaskan Class Tankers at BP’s Berth 121 in the Port of Long Beach

Part 2

Presenter – Craig Smith

Page 2: cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

Design Requirements

SAFETY, SAFETY, SAFETY!

No impact to berth operations :

During construction or from final design

Connection basics :

Plugs and cables must be suitable for marine environment

Vessel alignment for initial connection capable of +/- 11 feet fore and aft

Connection must be sufficiently automated to :

Minimize vessel crew / Require only 1 terminal employee to deliver cables

Enable connection & energizing process in < 2 hours

Allow for bumpless transfer (no blackout)

During cargo operations the system must allow for :

Overall change in height of 46 feet

Limited movement – 4 feet in either direction

Support of cables throughout discharge; no tension on plugs

Emergency shut down of power supply and disconnect

Page 3: cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

Scale = 100 feet

Vessel connection box

How it will Work

Cable Reel

Cable Reel Platform

Cable Reel

New walkway and shore cable route

Page 4: cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

1 2 43

Vessel Generators MAN B&W 6L48/60 – 6.3MW

Page 5: cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

Expected Emission Savings

Scenario

Estimated Emission Reductions

Incremental to base case, Net of land-based power plant

NOx CO PM ROG SOx

BASE CASE: No changes

No SSP’s ; 0.8% S fuel oil 0 0 0 0 0

COLD IRONING – Alaskan Class Vessels (short tons/ship call)

No SSP’s 1.8 0.09 0.07 0.3 0.5

Annual Emission Reductions for Alaska Class Vessels – Tons (Assume 12 Calls/Yr.) 22.1 1.1 0.8 3.4 6.3

Annual Emission Reduction for Ecstasy Cruise Ship (Environ LB Port Study - 2004) 69.3 2.9 6.34 0.8 51.9

Page 6: cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

Summary –

Cold ironing can be considered for the Alaskan Class vessels at Berth 121 since: Infrastructure in place for Shoreside Booster Pumps Diesel electric vessel design Vessel visit frequency for ANS fleet Shared capital expense with POLB

Cold ironing is clearly not a universal solution to reduce oil tanker emissions

Regulations should not dictate which technology is used to achieve emission reductions

Cold ironing is a more expensive option making voluntary participation less likely – use of emission reduction credits could help offset this expense and provide short-term incentives

Cold Ironing BP’s Alaskan Class Tankers at Berth 121

Page 7: cold-ironing-bps-alaskan-class-tankers-at-bps-berth-121-in3685 (1).ppt

Any Questions?