Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

26
The evolution of capital structure and operating performance after LBOs: Evidence from US tax returns Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

description

The evolution of capital structure and operating performance after LBOs: Evidence from US tax r eturns. Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011. Motivation. Difficult to study what happens after firms go private—No longer file financial statements. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Page 1: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

The evolution of capital structure and operating performance after LBOs:

Evidence from US tax returns

Cohn, Mills, and ToweryUBC Winter Conference, 2011

Page 2: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Motivation

• Difficult to study what happens after firms go private—No longer file financial statements.

• Existing evidence largely based on:– Firms with public debt outstanding.– Firms that exit (provide some backward looking

data).• Firms do have to file tax returns!– Unique access to tax returns allows for a more

complete view.

Page 3: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Questions addressed

• What are the real and financial effects of LBOs?– Real Effects:• Do better incentives provided by concentrated

ownership and disciplining effects of debt lead to better operating performance?

– Financial Effects:• How does leverage evolve after the LBO

– Temporary versus permanent effects on capital structure.– Tax implications.

Page 4: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

LBO TrendsAxelson et al. (2009)

Page 5: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Answers

Page 6: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Answers

Page 7: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

What should one expect?

• Practitioners talk about three sources of gains in LBOs.– Deleveraging.– Multiples expansion.– Operating Improvements.– Generally target >20% IRR to LP’s.

Page 8: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

DeleveragingYear

0 1 2 3 4 5Free Cash Flow 100 100 100 100 100 100Debt Repayment -100 -100 -100 -100 -100

Debt Levels 750 650 550 450 350 250

FCF Multiple 10 10 10 10 10 10

Enterprise Value 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000Less Debt -750 -650 -550 -450 -350 -250Equity Value 250 350 450 550 650 750

IRR 24.57%

Page 9: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Multiples ExpansionYear

0 1 2 3 4 5Free Cash Flow 100 100 100 100 100 100Debt Repayment 0 0 0 0 0

Debt Levels 750 750 750 750 750 750

FCF Multiple 10 11 12 13 14 15

Enterprise Value 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Less Debt -750 -750 -750 -750 -750 -750Equity Value 250 350 450 550 650 750

IRR 24.57%

Page 10: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Operating ImprovementsYear

0 1 2 3 4 5Free Cash Flow 100 110 120 130 140 150Debt Repayment 0 0 0 0 0

Debt Levels 750 750 750 750 750 750

FCF Multiple 10 10 10 10 10 10

Enterprise Value 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500Less Debt -750 -750 -750 -750 -750 -750Equity Value 250 350 450 550 650 750

IRR 24.57%

Assets 1000 1100 1210 1330 1460 1600ROA 10.0% 10.0% 9.9% 9.8% 9.6% 9.4%

Page 11: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

LBO Value Creation

Page 12: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Comments

• Paper would benefit from some structured hypotheses.– Jensen’s Free Cash Flow.• Decrease in investment and increase in profitability.

– Underleverage.• Permanent increase in leverage.

– Debt used as a transaction mechanism.• Transitory increase in leverage.

Page 13: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Why do firms go private?

Page 14: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Comments

• Need for some better comparisons to existing studies.– Mainly regarding how the tax data compares to Gaap

financials.– Would be useful to compare your measures versus the

gaap data pre-LBO and then during the LBO for the sample of public debt users.

• EBIT versus EBIAT.– I think you actually report earnings before interest

after tax.

Page 15: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Axelson et al. (2009)

Page 16: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Hotchkiss et al. (2010)

Page 17: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

This paper

Page 18: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

This PaperMeans

Pre (t-1) Post (t+2)Debt 446.60 749.20EBITDA 26.90 52.40Interest 17.70 45.50Total Assets 679.00 897.10Int Cov 1.52 1.15Debt/EBITDA 16.60 14.30D/A 0.66 0.84Asset Growth 0.32

Page 19: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Incentives and Performance Improvements (Oyer and Leslie)

– Difficult to observe counterfactual.– Significant Heterogeneity.

Page 20: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Leverage changes

• If this is an optimal capital structure why can’t public firms replicate this?– If the tax benefits are so large???– What is special about the LBO structure to support

so much debt?• Debt overhang?• Ability of sponsors to minimize risk/reduce bankruptcy

costs?• Private versus public?

– Reduce leverage again after an IPO.

Page 21: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Are LBOs Underlevered?Axelson et al. (2009)

Page 22: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Why isn’t leverage decreased?

Page 23: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Oyer and Leslie

Increase in leverage is not permanent.

Page 24: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Comments

• This does not look like Jensen’s free-cash flow hypothesis.– Higher incentives and debt curtail wasteful

spending by managers and focus attention on cash flow generation.• No substantial operating improvements.• Significant asset growth.• Financed largely by debt.• Why does interest coverage hardly change despite

increased debt?

Page 25: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Is Asset Growth From Cash?Kwik Fit LBO

Page 26: Cohn, Mills, and  Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

Conclusions

• Observe LBOs throughout the lifecycle.• How does the data compare to Compustat?• More direct tests of hypotheses.• Heterogeneity in LBOs.– Underleveraged prior to LBO?– Free cash flow problems?– Overinvestment?