Cognitive theory
-
Upload
yaseen-zebary -
Category
Education
-
view
87 -
download
2
Transcript of Cognitive theory
![Page 1: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cognitive approaches to second
language learning
Yaseen Taha
![Page 2: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Schools of thought
cognitive approaches
Behaviourism
Learning strategies
Processing approaches
![Page 3: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What are the Schools of thought?
![Page 4: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Schools of thought
Structural linguistics and
behavioral psychology
1900s, 1940s, 1950s
Generative linguistics and
cognitive psychology
1970s, 1980s
Constructivism 1980s, 1990s,
2000s
![Page 5: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What does cognitive theory mean?
A theory of learning processes that focuses on how people
think, understand, and know. It does not specifies
precisely what is learned, what content will be easiest (or
most difficult) to learn, or what learners will select to
learn at different stages of development or levels of
mastery of a complex skill. It came about as a reaction to
behaviorism.
A cognitive theory of learning sees second language
acquisition as a conscious and reasoned thinking process,
involving the deliberate use of learning strategies.
![Page 6: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Important cognitive theorists
Allan Paivio, Robert Gagne, Howard Gardener, Benjamin Bloom.
![Page 7: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Behaviourism
a highly influential academic school of psychology. It assumes
that a learner is essentially passive, responding to environment
stimuli. Believes that a learner starts out with a clean slate, and
behavior is shaped by positive and negative reinforcement.
Reinforcement, positive or negative increases the possibility of an
event happening again. Punishment, both positive and negative,
decreases the possibility of an event happening again.
It implies that the learner responds to environmental stimuli
without his/her mental state being factor in the learners' behavior.
Individual learns to behave through conditioning.
![Page 8: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Comparison between BEHAVIORIST theory and COGNITIVIST
theory
Behaviorism is a learning theory
As a formation of habit,
conditioning
Practice is necessary, constant
repetition
Learner is passive
Behaviorists: teach, plan, present
language item, make Students
repeat
Errors are forbidden
Ignored thought and emotions
Cognitivism is a learning theory, based on how people think not a theory that specifies precisely what is learned what content will be easiest to learn, or what learners will select tolearn at different stages of development
Learning results from internal activity (mental processes)
Practice is necessary, but rote learning and meaningless repetition is out.
Learners process, store, and retrieve information
Cognitivists: creates opportunities for learning to occur
Errors can be. Through them one can learn
![Page 9: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Universal Grammar theorists were interested in competence of second
language grammars, and in its construction. They are not centrally concerned
with how learners access this linguistic knowledge in real time, or in the
strategies they might employ when their incomplete linguistic system lets
them down, or why some individuals are substantially better than others at
learning other languages. For cognitive theorists, on the other hand, these
are central issues.
![Page 10: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Dichotomy between linguistics
language
A separate innate module in the mind
Another form of information processed by
general mechanisms
![Page 11: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Researchers
believe that there is a language-specific module for first languageacquisition, but that the learning of second languages is differentand relies on general cognitive mechanisms.
Even for first language acquisition, some researchers believe thatsome aspects of language acquisition are innate and other aspectsnot.
![Page 12: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Cognitive theorists
Pienemann, or Towell and Hawkins belong to Processing approaches.
These approaches investigate how second language learners processlinguistic information, and how their ability to process the secondlanguage develops over time. They are focused primarily on thecomputational dimension of language learning, and might or might notbelieve that language is a separate innate module. (information-processing approaches)
N.C. Ellis, MacWhinney, or Tomasello belong to emergentism,constructionist approaches ( the acquisition of language from theconstructionist or emergentist point of view).
![Page 13: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Processing approaches
they are interested in the way in which the brain's processing mechanisms deal
with the second language.
The first approach, information processing, investigates how different
memory stores (short-term memory (STM); long-term memory (LTM) -
declarative and procedural) deal with new second language information, and
how this information is automatized and restructured through repeated
activation.
The second approach, processability theory, looks more specifically at the
processing demands made by various formal aspects of the second language,
and the implications for learnability and teachability of second language
structure.
![Page 14: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The multi-store model of memory
![Page 15: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Information-processing models of second
language learning
McLaughlin's (1987, 1990) information-processing model
Anderson's Active Control of Thought (ACT*) model (1983 , 1985)
![Page 16: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Second language learning is viewed as the acquisition of
a complex cognitive skill. To learn a second language is
to learn a skill, because various aspects of the task must
be practised and integrated into fluent performance.
These two notions - automatization and restructuring
- are central to cognitive theory. (McLaughlin, 1987, pp.
133-4)
![Page 17: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Automatization
the way in which we process information may be either controlled orautomatic, and that learning involves a shift from controlled towardsautomatic processing.
Learners first resort to controlled processing in the second language.This controlled processing involves the temporary activation of a selectionof information nodes in the memory. Such processing requires a lot ofattentional control on the part of the subject, and is constrained by thelimitations of the short-term memory.
For example, a beginner learner wanting to greet someone in the secondlanguage might activate the following words: Good Morning How Are You?Initially, these words have to be put together in a piecemeal fashion, one at atime (assuming they have not been memorized as an unanalysed chunk).
![Page 18: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Through repeated activation, sequences first produced by
controlled processing become automatic. Automatized sequences
are stored as units in the long-term memory, which means that
they can be made available very rapidly whenever the situation
requires it. So, in the above example, once a learner has activated
the sequence Good Morning How Are You? a large number of
times, it becomes automatic, that is, it does not require attentional
control. However, once acquired, such automatized skills are
difficult to delete or modify.
![Page 19: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Learning in this view is seen as the movement from controlled to
automatic processing via practice (repeated activation). When this shift
occurs, controlled processes are freed to deal with higher levels of
processing (i.e. the integration of more complex skill clusters), thus
explaining the incremental (step by step) nature of learning. It is
necessary for simple sub-skills and routines to become automatic before
more complex ones can be tackled. Once our learner has automatized
Good Morning How Are You?, he or she is free to deal with the
learning of more complex language, as the short-term memory is not
taken up by the production of this particular string.
![Page 20: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
This continuing movement from controlled to automatic processingresults in a constant restructuring of the linguistic system of thesecond language learner. Second language learners often start bymemorizing unanalysed chunks of language, which will later beanalysed and give rise to productive rules . For example, a learnermight first memorize a question as an unanalyzed chunk, forexample Have you got a pet?, without having a productive rule forinterrogatives, involving inversion. When this learner startsgenerating interrogatives that are not rote-learned chunks, he or shemight produce an alternative, uninverted form, such Has you havepet?
![Page 21: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Anderson's Active Control of Thought (ACT*) model (1983 ,
1985)
Another processing model from cognitive psychology, which has also beenapplied to aspects of SLL.
It enables declarative knowledge (i.e. knowledge that something is the case) tobecome procedural knowledge (i.e. knowledge how to do something).
One of the major differences is that Anderson posits three kinds of memory: aworking memory, similar to McLaughlin's short-term memory and thereforetightly capacity-limited, and two kinds of long-term memory - a declarative long-term memory and a procedural long-term memory. Anderson believes thatdeclarative and procedural knowledge are different kinds of knowledge that arestored differently.
![Page 22: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Declarative Knowledge (i.e. knowledge that something is the case)
Procedural Knowledge (i.e. knowledge how to do something).
For example: If you are learning to drive, you will be told that if the engine is
revving too much, you need to change to a higher gear; you will also be told how
to change gear. In the early stages of learning to drive, however, knowing that
(declarative knowledge) you have to do this does not necessarily mean that you
know how (procedural knowledge) to do it quickly and successfully. In other
words, you go through a declarative stage before acquiring the procedural
knowledge linked with this situation. With practice, however, the mere noise of
the engine getting louder will trigger your gear changing, without you even
having to think about it. This is how learning takes place in this view: by
declarative knowledge becoming procedural and automatized.
![Page 23: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Let us illustrate with an example how the notions of declarative and
procedural knowledge could apply to SLL. If we take the example of the
third person singular -s marker on present tense verbs in English, the
classroom learner might initially know, in the sense that she has
consciously learnt the rule, that s/he + Verb requires the addition of an -s to
the stem of the verb. However, that same learner might not necessarily be
able to consistently produce the -s in a conversation in real time. This is
because this particular learner has declarative knowledge of that rule, but it
has not yet been proceduralized. After much practice, this knowledge will
hopefully become fully proceduralized, and the third person -s will be
supplied when the context requires it.
![Page 24: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
According to Anderson, the move from declarative to
procedural knowledge takes place in three stages
1. The cognitive stage: a description of the procedure is learnt.
2. The associative stage: a method for performing the skill is
worked out.
3.The autonomous stage: The skill becomes more and more rapid
and automatic.
![Page 25: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
In the examples outlined above, in the cognitive stage, the learner would learn
that the clutch pedal has to be pushed down and the gear lever moved to the
correct position, or, in the case of the language example, that an -s must be
added to the verb after a third person subject.
In the associative stage, the learner would work out how to do it, that is, how
to press the pedal down and how to get the gear lever in the correct position, or
how to add an -s when the context requires it. In other words, the learner learns
to associate an action (or a set of actions) with the corresponding declarative
knowledge.
In the autonomous stage, our learner's actions (changing gear or adding an -S)
become increasingly automatic, to the point that the corresponding declarative
knowledge may even be lost; in other words, our learner might not be able to
explain or even be conscious of what they are doing.
![Page 26: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
When tasks become proceduralized, they are accessed automatically, withouthaving to resort to the working memory, which is limited in its processingcapacity.
Here, we see the basic suggestions that the learner's speech becomes morefluent as more knowledge becomes proceduralized, and is thereforeaccessed more quickly and efficiently. We can also see how, as knowledgebecomes proceduralized, the working memory is freed to work on higherlevel knowledge.
What do Learning strategies mean?
![Page 27: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
procedures undertaken by the learner, in order to make their ownlanguage learning as effective as possible. Learning strategies arespecial ways of processing information that enhancecomprehension, learning or retention of information. They mayinclude:
Learning strategies must not be confused with communicationstrategies, although there is some overlap; their focus is onfacilitating learning.
communication strategies are used in order to overcome a specificcommunicative problem.
![Page 28: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Learning Strategies:
Metacognitive strategies
Cognitive Strategies
Social or Affective Strategies
![Page 29: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Metacognitive Strategies
It is important but overlooked
Thinking about thinking in another words knowing what we know and what we do not know
They are techniques that help people become more successful learners
When you read something you have strategies so in thinking also
Before: developing a plan (you can ask yourself why am I doing this, what should I do first, how much time do I need to do this,,
During: monitoring the plan: how am I doing, am I on the right track, am I getting close to my goals, do I need to do if I do not get it
After: Evaluating the plan: how did I do,, did I do better or worse than I thought
![Page 30: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Before beginning while working After completing
a task on a task the task
Set goals: plan the check on the task Assess how well you have
Content sequence task accomplish the task
Choose strategies check the how well you have used
comprehension the learning strategies
check the production Identify changes to be
made next time
Planning/ Organizing MonitoringEvaluating
![Page 31: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Cognitive strategies
Rehearsal (repeating)
Organization (grouping, classifying)
Inferencing (Using information in text to guess meanings or
new linguistic items, predict outcomes or complete missing
parts)
Summarizing (restate most important points, condense key
words, remove repetition,
Deducing (applying rules to the understanding of language)
Imagery (using visual images)
![Page 32: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Transfer (using known linguistic information to
facilitate a new learning task)
ex. Learning to drive a car helps a person to later drive
truck),
ex. mathematics; physics…
Elaboration (linking ideas contained in new information,
or integrating new ideas with known information)
![Page 33: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Social or Affective strategies
Cooperation : working with peers to solve a problem, pool information,check notes or get feedback on a learning activity
Questioning for clarification: eliciting from a teacher or peer additionalexplanation, rephrasing or examples.
Self-talk: Using mental redirection of thinking to assure oneself that alearning activity will be successful or to reduce anxiety abouta task.
![Page 34: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Theories of second language processing
Processability theory
Perceptual Saliency approach
Processability theory Processability theory is part of the cognitiveapproach to second language acquisition that attempts to increaseunderstanding of the ways L2 learners restructure their interlanguageknowledge systems.
LikeTowell and Hawkins, the Processability theory outlined by Pienemann(1998, 2003) also claims we need to use both a theory of grammar and aprocessing component in order to understand second language acquisition. Thetheory of grammar, titled Lexical Functional Grammar, also differs from theChomskyan theory. Suffice it to say that Lexical Functional Grammar,
![Page 35: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
unlike Universal Grammar, is a theory of grammar that
attempts to represent both linguistic knowledge and
language processing within the same framework. Unlike
Universal Grammar, which is exclusively a theory of
linguistic knowledge, Lexical Functional Grammar aims
to be psychologically plausible, that is, to be in line with
the cognitive features of language processing
![Page 36: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Processability theory aims to clarify how learners acquire the
computational mechanisms that operate on the linguistic
knowledge they construct. Pienemann believes that language
acquisition itself is the gradual acquisition of these computational
mechanisms
The basic logic behind Processability theory is that learners
cannot access hypotheses about the second language that they
cannot process. They are claimed to have a Hypothesis Space,
which develops over time according to the following hierarchy of
processing resources
![Page 37: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Level 1: lemma access; words; no sequence of constituents.
Level 2: category procedure; lexical morphemes; no exchange of
information - canonical word order.
Level 3 : phrasal procedure; phrasal morphemes.
Level 4: simplified S-procedure; exchange of information from
internal to salient constituent.
Level 5: S-procedure; inter-phrasal morphemes; exchange of
information between internal constituents.
Level 6: Subordinate clause procedure.
![Page 38: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Teachability
Pienemann developed his Processability theory in order to explain thewell documented observation that second language learners follow afairly rigid route in their acquisition of certain grammatical structures.This notion of route implies that structures only become learnable whenthe previous steps on this acquisitional path have been acquired.
The predictions of the Teachability hypothesis are as follows:
• Stages of acquisition cannot be skipped through formal instruction.• Instruction will be most beneficial if it focuses on structures from 'the
next stage
![Page 39: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Operating principles and first language acquisition
Slobin's (1973 , 1979, 1985) operating principles are based on the claim that 'certainlinguistic forms are more "accessible" or more "salient" to the child than others
Operating Principle A: pay attention to the ends of words.
Operating Principle B: there are linguistic elements that encode relations betweenwords.
Operating Principle C: avoid exceptions.
Operating Principle D: underlying semantic relations should be marked overtlyand clearly.
Operating Principle E: the use of grammatical markers should make semanticsense.
![Page 40: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Operating principles in second language acquisition The one-to-one principle
an interlanguage system should be constructed in such a way that anintended underlying meaning is expressed with one clear invariantsurface form (or construction). Example: Learners of German initiallymaintain an SVO word order in all contexts, in spite of the fact thatGerman word order is not so consistent (Clahsen, 1984).
the one-to-one principle means that learners of English will often startwith just one form for negation (e.g. no the dog; he no go), but oncethis form has been incorporated into their interlanguage, they are able tonotice other forms and differentiate the environment in which theyoccur.
![Page 41: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The relexification principle
when you cannot perceive the structural pattern used by the
language you are trying to acquire, use your native language
structure with lexical items from the second language. Example:
Japanese learners of English sometimes use Japanese SOV word
order in English in the early stages, with English lexical items.
![Page 42: Cognitive theory](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042818/55ab75ec1a28aba2588b474d/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Thanks For Listening