Coen van der Krogt Product Sales Manager December 9, 2010 c.krogt@elsevier
description
Transcript of Coen van der Krogt Product Sales Manager December 9, 2010 c.krogt@elsevier
1
Coen van der KrogtProduct Sales ManagerDecember 9, [email protected]
Innovative Ways to Support Researchers and Research Management
SciVal Spotlight
2
Multiple Trends Impact The Research Landscape
Improve research outcomes
Multidisciplinarity
Competition / CollaborationHigh mobility
Accountability / Government policies
ResearchStrategy
& Research
Performance
3
Scopus Supporting Researchers Supporting Performance Evaluation Basis for analytical and workflow tools from the SciVal suite
SciVal SpotlightSupporting Research Management
Agenda
4
Scopus - Most comprehensive Abstracts and Citations database
Increased prestige, ranking and funding because you . . .
. . . improve your institutional productivity . . .
. . . by enabling the management to make better decisions . . .
. . . and improving student and researcher productivity . . .
…because Scopus (a) enables you to evaluate performance and quality accurately . . .
. . . (b) offers you the most efficient and effective search . . .
. . . and (c) provides access to the most comprehensive content . . .
. . . thereby unlocking the library’s full potential enabled by . . .
Best evaluation of performance and quality:• Broadest coverage of peer-reviewed, high quality journals• Globally as well as locally• More accurate citation count, fairer recognition for work
Improve productivity of Researcher and Student:• Most efficient and effective search• Access to most comprehensive content
Secure institutional success . . .
5
Scopus has significantly more journals in its database than WoS
Source: JISC Collections Academic Database
WoS total: 11,419 Scopus total: 19,981
Unique WoS titles: 896
Unique Scopus titles:
9,458
Joint titles:10,523
Year 2010
6
Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
0
1000
2000
Humanities & creative arts
0
2000
4000
6000
Engineering & environmental Sciences
Social, Behavioural & Economic Sciences
0
1250
2500
0
2500
5000
Mathematics, Information & Communication Sciences
0
2000
4000
Biological Sciences and Biotechnology
0
3500
7000
Biomedical &Clinical Research
0
1500
3000
Public and Health Services
Scopus has a large article coverage per subject area
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Scopus versus WoS content coverage (number of journals)Scopus
Web of Science
7
7
Less than 10% of our nearest competitor’s journals come from outside North America and Western Europe
Scopus has more than 20% of its journals from outside this region
Scopus covers “local” content for local audiences and for audiences who want to know what is happening elsewhere
a perfect global coverage
Scopus
Web of Science
300
150
0
500
250
0
2,000
1,000
0
2,000
1,000
0
8,000
4,000
0
8,000
4,000
0
600
300
0
Scopus versus WoS geographical coverage (number of journals)
8
Example: higher coverage of local journals from Croatia in Scopus
78 active titles (total 104, including 26 inactive titles)
January 2010 Figures
+229% (active
titles)
9
Journal Evaluation – some challenges:
• I’m a publishing author in a niche area, how can I compare with researchers in another scientific field?
• How can I get a value that reflects citation behaviour in my research area?
• It’s 2010 – why can I only get a ranking relevant to 2008?• Where can I find the data that have been used to generate
this number?• The Impact Factor does not cover the journal I’m publishing
in. What now?
Summary: Difficult to compare Not recent enoughLack of clarity of data originLack of coverage
10
January 2010: 2 new journal metrics in Scopus - SJR and SNIP
SJR - SCImago Journal Rank
SNIP - Source-Normalized Impact per Paper
Comparison Normalization of differences between fieldsRecent Refreshed twice per year: April and
SeptemberData origin Eliminates risk of manipulationCoverage All 19,000+ journals, proceedings and book
series in Scopus receive SJR and SNIP values
www.journalmetrics.com
11Journal Analyzer in Scopus
12
...Elsevier Is Changing With You
Solutions based on Scopus Supporting Research Management
The Research Landscape is changing
13Performance & Evaluation Demonstration of Expertise Network Research Support
Institution/Country Researcher/Group Institution ResearcherAGGREGATION
Spotlight Strata FundingShowcaseExpert
ProfilingScopus-EP-VIVO
SciVerse Scopus
VC/President Dean •VC/President•Library
•VC/President•Dir. Research
Admin.•Dean
VC/President Dir. Research Admin. Library
Office of Research•Dean
•Dept. Head•Researchers
•Students•Researchers
•Dir. Research Admin.
•Researchers
•Researchers•Research Admin
Staff•Researchers
•What are my interdisciplinary
strengths?
•Who are the high performers in my
strategic priorities?
•How can I act upon my competitive
advantage?
•How are my researchers performing
relative to their peers?
•I want to evaluate researchers with
the criteria that are important to me.
•I want to demonstrate my
institution’s research expertise in the areas that are of strategic
importance to us
I need to find researchers in other disciplines that I can
collaborate with in my institution (or within the EP community)
Dir. Research Administration: I
need to easily populate VIVO with
my researchers’ profiles
Researchers: I need to find researchers
from other institutions with whom I can
collaborate
•Find funding opportunities
•Determine the right funding strategy
•Increase success rates
•What are the most highly-cited
articles and authors within a research area?
•h-index of an author
•Overview of all of an author or
institution’s publications
Positioning Overview: SciVal Suite
14
Determining research strategy at the level where it counts: the
topics that researchers are focused on, not the fields they're in
Identifying researchers with certain expertise for recruitment or collaboration
Assessing productivity
and impact of researchers and their output
Demonstrating research
excellence for the institution
Finding grants that are matched to the right research topic or researcher
Spotlight
Funding
Strata
Showcase
Expert Profiling
Reviewer Finder
Scopus.com
PRIMARY CUSTOMER GOAL(S) SUPPORTED BY THE SUITE
15
SciValSpotlight
16
1. Definition: • Spotlight is a web based solution to identify the
institutional research strengths. With the aim to assess the institutional strategy of research management
• It is NOT an evaluation tool for authors or papers2. What we define as a research strength
(competency)? • Areas of research (multi- or single-discipline) where our
institution has a significant quantity of papers (from one or more authors) published during the last 5 years
• So some highly cited authors may not be shown...
WHAT IS SPOTLIGHT ?
17
3. How we define the areas of research?• Not by: disciplines, key words or journals.• By the CO-CITATION ANALYSIS and the yearly creation of the map of
science (Klavans & Boyack).
WHAT IS SPOTLIGHT ?
18
2Pape
r 1
Ref. Paper
A
Ref. Paper
B
Paper 2
Ref. Paper
A
Ref. Paper
BPaper 3
Ref. Paper
A
Ref. Paper
BStrength of relationship
proportional to frequency of the co-citation linkage
1
Paper 1
Ref. Paper
A
Ref. Paper
B
A and B have a cognitive
relationship
CO-CITATION ANALYSIS: BASED ON TWO ASSUMPTIONS
19
4. What is the base of co-citation analysis?• We group all the papers indexed in SCOPUS during the last 5 years
in clusters (approx 90.000) based on their references.• We select the clusters in which our institution has a significant number
of papers (compared with the largest competitor world wide - RAS). • We group the selected clusters in competencies based on the
references of the papers published by our institution
CO-CITATION ANALYSIS: BASED ON TWO ASSUMPTIONS
20
SAME CLUSTERS; DIFFERENT GROUPINGS = DISTINCTIVE COMPETENCIES
Einstein University’s map
•DC 1 = cluster A•EC 2 = clusters B, C & D
Athena University’s map
•DC 1 = clusters C, D & E•EC 2 = cluster B
22
Identify Competencies and Market Strengths Attract Funding Spot Interdisciplinary Trends Strengthen Collaboration Improve Recruitment and Retention Use Funds More Strategically
SciVal Spotlight – Research Portfolio Analysis and Optimization
23
23
Insight in global strengths
MULTI-DISCIPLINARYRESEARCH AREAS
MEDICINEBIOTECHNOLOGY
INFECTIOUS DISEASE
BIOLOGY
EARTH SCIENCE
ENGINEERING
CHEMISTRY
MATHS & PHYSICSCOMPUTER SCIENCE
SOCIAL SCIENCE
BRAIN RESEARCH
HEALTH SCIENCE
RESEARCH AREAWITH GLOBAL STRENGTH (Competency)
24
24
Insight in global strengths
Each circle represents aDistinctive/Emerging
Competencyfor your institution
A larger circle means a larger market size (number
of publications) for this Distinctive Competency
Circles positioned towardsthe middle indicate aninterdisciplinary mix
MULTI-DISCIPLINARYRESEARCH AREAS
25
Matrix from the Boston Consulting Group 25
Question mark Star
Cash cowDog
highlow
Mar
ket
Gro
wth
Relative Market Share
VISUALIZATION - MATRIX
MATRIX VIEW: Distinctive competency performance relative to your largest competitor
Find rapidly emerging areas of research;
potential areas for further investment
Select a view to see in which
areas you are growing orreducing market share
27
The 2009 Spotlight map of
University of Zagreb
28
General Statistics
29
University of Zagreb
127 (low level) competencies
30
University of Zagreb
12 high level competencies
31
Clicking through from high level to low level competencies
32
Low level competencies within high level competency Medical Specialties
33
Clicking through to the details of DC1
34
Looking at the details of DC1
35
More details on DC1
36
What are the top authors in DC1?
Check the metrics for the most interesting authors
37
What are the top authors in DC1 from University of Zagreb?
38
Click on an author, to get more details
39
What are the top authors in DC1 collaborating with University of Zagreb?
40
Combining ‘’All authors’’ with ‘’Collaborating authors’’ leads to new potential collaborators
41
What are the top institutions in DC1?
Check the metrics for the most interesting institutions
42
What are the top institutions in DC1 collaborating with University of Zagreb?
43
Combining ‘’All institutions’’ with ‘’Collaborating institutions’’ leads to new potential collaborators
44
Overview of all competencies
45Use Case
Reaching and Maintaining Leadership
46
High Level Competency's map of 2009
47
Reaching and maintaining leadership
48
Reaching and maintaining leadership
49
Details of EC 18. Quality indicators
50
Institutions in EC18
51
Authors in EC18
52
53
54
55
Collaboration sheet – future functionality
56
Identify Competencies and Market Strengths Attract Funding Spot Interdisciplinary Trends Strengthen Collaboration Improve Recruitment and Retention Use Funds More Strategically
SciVal Spotlight – Summary
58
Backup slides
59
1. Comparing different years?
60
2008 MAP 2009
Different position different multidisciplinary mix.
Different position means different strategic market position.
61
General Statistics
62
Comparing the years?
The reasons comparison of maps year-to-year has some limitations, is because thealgorithm that drives Spotlight goes back to five years of prior articles as an analyticwindow. When a new year map is created, roughly 20% of the articles (i.e. from 2004)are dropped and a new full year of data (2009) is added. In future releases, we arecommitted to making it easier to compare maps year-to-year by introducing time-seriesanalysis capabilities into Spotlight.
632. The 2009 Spotlight map of
Ruder Boskovic Institute
64
Ruder Boskovic Institute
36 (low level) competencies
65
66