FBLA Dress Code Presentation Future Business Leaders of America.
Code for america
-
Upload
john-wilbanks -
Category
Technology
-
view
655 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Code for america
code for americasummer code party23 june 2012
john wilbanks@wilbanks
if government = platformthen science = wiki
why not extend?
if government = platformthen science = wiki
why not extend?
for every $100,000 invested.6 to 5 papers published.
for every $100,000 invested.6 to 5 papers published.
all credit to @researchremix
a terribly inefficient wiki.
1. open content
since no publisher has presented adverse event data
why not extend?
“data and analytics to enable its customers to evaluate and manage risks associated with
transactions”
since no publisher has presented adverse event data
why not extend?
“It would also compel American taxpayers to subsidize the acquisition of important research information by foreign governments and corporations that compete in global markets with the public and private scientific enterprises conductedin the United States.”
on FRPAA:
(american association of publishers)
foreign governments can afford subscriptions if they
want them.
no change in outcome without change in stakeholders.
WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:Require free, timely access over the Internet to journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research.
We believe in the power of the Internet to foster innovation, research, and education. Requiring the published results of taxpayer-funded research to be posted on the Internet in human and machine readable form would provide access to patients and caregivers, students and their teachers, researchers, entrepreneurs, and other taxpayers who paid for the research. Expanding access would speed the research process and increase the return on our investment in scientific research.
The highly successful Public Access Policy of the National Institutes of Health proves that this can be done without disrupting the research process, and we urge President Obama to act now to implement open access policies for all federal agencies that fund scientific research.
thanks @sennoma, @mrgunn, and more!
2. open data
“raw data now”
gathered independently, for different reasons...
“raw metadata and standards processes, and consensus processes, and document submission standards, and archives”
no: trackingfollowupaccountabilitytransparency
existential questions about data…
3. open consent
data collected 1994-962695 participantsgrant cost $85 per person THREE SCENARIOS
data used to be really hard to get.
5 months~ 7,680,000 ratings
~ 500,000 meals50 countries
no grantno IRB
no academicsTHREE SCENARIOS
[at least some] people really like to share as their form of controlTHREE SCENARIOS
THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF INFORMED CONSENT
PORTABLE CONSENT TO DONATE YOUR DATA TO SCIENCETHREE SCENARIOS
terms in blue pop up to definitions
volunteer must click to proceed
all boxes must be checked
volunteer cannot skip video
data types:1. genome2. medical / health records3. lifestyle4. laboratory (connect via GUID)
Individual Level Data
De-identifiedDataset
Sage BionetworksCGRE
Portable Legal Consent
1 2 3 4 5
Participants
Researchers
CGRE Database Synapse Database
Advocacy Foundation
Hospital
Advocacy Foundation
Portable Legal Consent
Public Recruitment
Sage BionetworksSynapse
Portable Legal Consent
1 2 3
Advocacy Foundation
Hospital
Advocacy Foundation
making science a modestly effective wiki.
content + permission + people
thank you and good luck.
http://weconsent.us - consenthttp://del-fi.org - blog