For Internal Use Only

www.gdit.com/health

General Dynamics Health Solutions Company Overview July 2016

For Internal Use Only

Health Solutions at a Glance

Expanding Insight. Ensuring Value. Improving Outcomes.

FoForr InInterternalnal UsUsee OnOnlyly

Single Source for Proven End-to-End Health Solutions

● Health Systems Development & Integration● Health Information Exchange● Data Warehousing and Analytics● Population Health Management● Quality Measurement, Management,

Reporting & Payment Solutions● Fraud, Waste and Abuse –

Detection & Prevention● Big Data

● Medical Facility Outfitting & Transition● Medical Logistics & Supply Chain

Management● Implementation of Health IT & Support

Services

● Subsidy, Reimbursement & Claims Processing Systems – Development & Support

● Medical Record Review● ICD-10 Transition● Eligibility Determination &

Enrollment

● Multi-Channel Contact Center Management● On-Demand Inbound & Outbound

Communications & Print Fulfillment● System Development, Integration &

Process Design

● Medical Research Support● Clinical Support Staff● Credentialed Healthcare Professionals

● Data & Infrastructure Management● Networking & Communications● Virtual Desktop Environment● Cloud● Cyber Security

4 | www.gdit.com/health

For Internal Use Only

Omnibus 3 Comments

Large Business Perspective

Key Personnel • Many task orders require a large number of key personnel – even administrative

labor categories which heavily favors the incumbent.• Industry does not view administrative/executive assistants as key with

specialized hard to find or unique skill sets.

SOO/PWS • Statement of Objectives/PWS Requirements in the RFP for Task Orders do not

clearly articulate the education and experience requirements and are fairly generic.

• Evaluators provide detailed comments in debriefs calling out proposed personnel experience as weaknesses for requirements that are often not included in the SOO.

Technical Evaluations• In the SOO the Government asks vendors to provide a solution. If the proposed

solution does not mirror the existing org structure on the program the evaluators cite this a weakness in the proposal response. Should the evaluators be dictating the contractors organizational support structure on a non-personal services contract? Is an organization chart really a weakness?

• Evaluators appear to be making subjective judgements about the relevance of past experience, that relevance = this specific organization only.

Considerations for Omnibus 4

• Determine page limits for task order proposal submissions.• Requiring industry to prepare a PWS for task orders is only helpful when the Government actually uses the PWS, otherwise it is a waste of B&P resources. • Provide accurate education, experience, and qualifications for personnel in the RFP/Task Order documents. This will yield more complete technical responses.

For Internal Use Only

Points of Contact

Points of Contact

For Internal Use OnlyGDIT Proprietary8 | www.gdit.com/health

GD Health Solutions Military Health and Veterans Affairs

Section VP Military Health and VA VP: David Meyer● David.Meyer@gdit.com ● (703) 852-2807

Health Life Sciences VP: Julie McGrath ● Julie.McGrath@GDIT.com ● (301) 628-2945

Senior Program Manager: John Alvarez ● John.Alvarez@GDIT.com ● (301) 815-5824

Senior Program Manager: Pius Aiyelawo ● Pius.Aiyelawo@GDIT.com ● (301) 495-7096

For Internal Use Only