ISRP Preliminary Report: Review of Anadromous Fish Habitat ...
COASTAL ANADROMOUS FISH PASSAGE ......tp assjst long-tqnge:plapning efforts. Implementation: The...
Transcript of COASTAL ANADROMOUS FISH PASSAGE ......tp assjst long-tqnge:plapning efforts. Implementation: The...
ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE FOR YEAR2009
COASTAL ANADROMOUS FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION
PROGRESS REPORT
Prepared
September 2010
Prtpar11d b- tbe California Departtnellt of Iranspqrtation Division ofEnvironl)leatal Analy$1amp
Progreu Depm-t Jmuary to Decembul009 Purpose
This is 1Mfifth annual report p19PMed in acwrdance with Article 35 ofChapter I ofDivision 1 ofthe Streets and Hgbways Code (SB 857 Kuehl) that look dfeetJanuary 1 2006 1his Jaw directs the Caliomia Department ofTranspot1ation (Department) to prepare 1111 annual ~ort desctibirtgmiddot the status ofthe Depanments pro~on locating assessing and remediating projectrrelatedhametS to fish p~ssage SB 857 aloo directs tbe Department to report itsprcgress on developinJpt progtammatiocnvironmenai~viewp~ess to streamline the permitting process for temooiatin~ fish ~~assage barrier projects
This reportdescribes the Departments fishJmssage1Utivitics bctwe~n Januu-y I and D~ber 31 20reg On September__ 2010 Direct()t McKitn-signed the Memorandum of Url(fT$Utfi1ing A coortlinatfd Appro4Cii to Wtoring Fish PU3sage for Allailromow Salmon ids i1t Coostai Watersheds tJmmg1 Cnarion ofFWt PaJSage F onlltl making the-Depanmllnt a full signatorymemba- ofthe Fish Passage Porum
The Depuimeut isrued a policy memorandum on July 7 2006 from JayNotVeD Chief Division ofEnvironmental Analysis (DBA) 10 District Deputy Directors and othen That memJJtandwn set SB 857 related policy provided a copy ofSB 857 nod provided fish passage asses$Ilent and reporting protocols The DE A mllinteins intemal inlran~ web pages that gtCOntain cop~of various policy memoraoda and gudance tlcluding a pagefor fish passage assessment an aruwal SB 857 repolfulg page md IIpermit streamlining page~lated to deveOping a programmaticmiddot envirorunenM review prooesl TI1ese pages provide e~yaccess to policy and gui~ce
The DcpatJIellt issued a policyupdate memorandum on May 6 2010 from Richard Unl Chief Eqgineer updating progtlllll and reponing requirements plan updates and new reporting schedules The memorandum fotmall~ incorporatesthe elemenlsmiddotofthe KemptonfEng lt~gteement directs districts to update fish passageJllltiS und provides direction for the development -of district fish pa~age remediation
Chanampes in Alwasl Reportin andApproadl
TheDepar1roent ismuking ehangS to the annuat report to address the elements ofhe agreement between Assembtymemba Eng lettef attaclted) Chair offhe Assembly Transportation Cornmiuee aijd Director Kemptctn dated May 26 2009 The twelve changes are
Requested Cltage Prepare an onnual report rlrat describesJuh passage remediation work completed inmiddot the prior calendar peat Januiiry I to December 31 lnelude schedules and focaticms for programmed 1-emedtatiotiS
lmpemerttation Tables 1 and 2 below provide locations ot remedintioos and project schldules for the calendar year from January 1 2009 to December 31 2609
Requested Cha1~ge Deft~ aftshyasY48f1 barrier remediation project aS a projecttifat tires federal or State jwuii(lg and isprogram~Md throug either the State Tra~porlaiiofl lillro~omettf Pragry11 (STP) tJr thNIIIJTr the Sia(l Trtgliwqy (lp~rati01 (fcPlvtect(tJIJ Prog~wn S[IOPP) Include new ccnstnuziots~ rehabilitations repajrs retrOfits alterqtio1JS ornlainlenaiICe prQjetIJ
lmplementaliOn The Department diected that districts use the new proJect definition in project development
Requested Change fdentiJYpartial or completefish passage bullbarriers using tlle definitions In the DFG niQrmal Fish PIIsimiddotage ew~luahonratStretJm CrossingJ
ImplementatiOn TheD~arment directed thal districts fullltlw existing policy tliAt incorporates DFG guidance into the Departments fish passl)ge assegsmentand reporting protocols
Requested Change Ptuvidefish passage asrfS3ment data toprojecl desigil tmgineers
Implementation The Department dircctlld that dilltricta follow standatd practice and policy to asslSS poterttial fisn pasSllgemiddotbatriers llld assur~thatnew designs do lot impede tlsh pasampllge middot
Requ~tedOrange7 Providefoh passage barrier assessme11ts to DFG sa thut asampes3ment9 may be included in theirta(aboJe
Implementation The Department dirme4 that assessments are 3hared with OFG fur input into the OFG Calf ish database system This clatah~ system includes the Passag~ Assessment Database (PAD) which was desi~d in association with~ Fish Passage Forum to house and share fish pllSSage ass=ern data
Reguested Change D(TIIeop remediatiQIplOM in confultr1tion with DFG
lmplemetdatiou The Department directed that districts consult with DFG following stUldard pltldlce during project development
Requested Cha11ge Dcentgn rfjmediation elementS during tkprojecttksign phrne
rmplementl)tion The Department directed that districts llli11QIilation le8i8ltlllUTS
during PJUject design
Req11ested Change CafiStruci remediation elements
Implementation The Department dincted dtat construction ofremtdiation elements that are included in fue final project design Qr-eamptandilrd project dcliveryactivities
Requested Change Provitk notice to DFG when xlrrier~ arc remediated
Implementation The Oepartment verified that notice ofptojeclcompletiltm i~ typically a requifement ofpennits and that the Department contittues to notify DFG as requir~ In permit~
lleque3ted CJumJW CnnlittUemiddotassesWig tulyerts that are nat part rgtfplannedprojecu thrrgtl4gh the use middotofgranJ fimding tp assjst long-tqngeplapning efforts
Implementation The Depamnent contin~es to seek funding furmiddotnonproject remedlations
Requested Cltange Wcufi with DFG tojoittlly identifY highPriority tra11lt1pottation relaferJ fish barrier$ ltJf July 1 2JJJ0 rwliUlnMilllymiddotJI~t~
lmplementatioo The Dcentpl$lwt identified current transportation related priorities shown in Table 4 bei(IW by July l 20I 0 ltllli c9111inues working with Df() 10 develop statewide fish passage barrier priorities
Requested Change Use ttJtJifabkfedcralfimdueceived putsuant to the American Recovery laquond RelnvesmumtJct of2009 to the extent penmucd under felleral7aw
2
Implementation The American RecovCYand RelnvetmentAct of 2009 roqllired that eligible projects be immediateiy remfymiddot to break gtound for construction Tbe Act requirements did not allowtitile for th-~sesstnnntstudeslesign work right-ofway t)OquisiJion or permitlins neecentssaey for xew fish ~sQgeprojects
Aues3ment and Remediation ofFbb Passage liartten
Project-level rernediations sinceJanuarv 2006
Rerneditrtion Summary (7 5projun) The location for Table- I projext_s are shown on Figure I
Tale l ComplriedSalmoaid Fitll Pa11agt Barrier RemodlatUms Sln~ Jbullnaacy 11006
Project llistrlct Couuty Rou~e lostMlle Ptojed Namtbull
1 1 Dcl Norte 101 404 TribuOOy to Elk-Creel
2 I lwnboldt 101 1153 Stone Lagoon
3 I Humboldt LOI 407 ClfaddCmk
1 fendodlUI ~ 814 Rattlt1oalre Ct-sectk1
s ~1Norb1 l 43lgt-458 S111ith RiverWidepm~tltLble Cr~k)
6 2 Siskiyou 96 6_$0-65 5 ONeil Creck middotrribulaty to Xlamath River
7 2 Tehama 5 169 BiderCreek
8 2 Tehama 5 281 Dibble Czeek
9 2 Shusta 299 2075 Snit Croek Sacramento Tributary
10 3 Sierrat 49 40-94 Sittra 49CulV-lt Replacement Yuba
tL 5 Sama JOJ n9 E Ca_pitan Cre~Barbat~ 12 s Sllllta
101 41 Alroyo HondoBarbara
13 5 Santa 101 4719 ~CreekBarbara
14 s Santa Cruz I 10 Valencia Greek Tnbut1ry1o Aptos Creek
15 3 S3nJa CriJt 1 and 17 174-1742 Branclrorte Creek lllld CafiIOletll Creek
lnjcctgt clgtltnpl gtltd In 00~ore lhoWq ll1 bold uwllialtd Tllll
Tbullble z Active Projects witll Fl~h Paua~e
Projlaquot ~- District COunty Ruate lMtMile lgtate 1 Project Name
Culvert Projectsmiddot
I I MendOcino 1 625 DNS Cnlvert ~ilitation
TribUIY to PuddingCreek
2 1 Mendocino I 9283 CCA 1l201 4 Dunn CreeLFish Passage
l MendOdo
Mendocino
101 JJ~-
178~ CCA
11Jfl018 Hoolm~ BvDa
36Culv~4 1 101 f-fultjph CCA
1112012
3 l Mmdoeino 10 84 DNS Rattlesnake Greek
6 l ~ocino 128 3~88 DNS Beebe Storm Dattiage
7 l Mendocino 128 and 253
00shy501
CCA 1lJI20 12
264 Culverts
1tfeoclltKi~ 101 ~ 148 ~ McBriJidlr Credt4
Huiboldt Q 985shylOM
CCA 1001ZOU
1Ud Mouutain Cnek Fbh PatSilfll
10 1 Shbullll 299 3225 CCA 7ti4tzot4
BellaDiddv Lemm reekY
H 4 Mllri11 I 227 CCA 12Jlf2014 Qiacomini middotCr~l
12 4 S~moma l 32A CCA 12t2014 F ott Ross Crecl
13 4 Sonoma I 151-IS~
CCA 1212013 Gleason Beach
14 5 Sante Batbam
l 156 CCA 41112014
SaSipuroes Creek
lS s lialdamp -Barblra
101 0 ~ 9112014 RinconCteelt
lfl 7 Los Anje1es I 503 DNS Sol31iceCred4
Active Projects Summary (32 projeCI6) Thelocation for Table 1 projects are shown on Figure 2
Three new projects were added to this table (project numbers 10 18 and 19) Three projects have projected rompletion dates (CCA dale$) lh~t nave been tXleuded one year (ptpjectnumbers 3 ~and 20 1llree Disbict7 (Vcntuta County) projects were removed from the list(San Antonio Creek Bridge Reptacen1ent Lion Creek and Sisar Creek and Santa Paula ~k1 These sites wtre originaJiy lidded ~ue topotential temporary comtruction issues that have been resolved
tmiddot
4
T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd
]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName
Bridge ll(ljech
17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es
18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013
19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell
~ 211Til014
~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult
I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84
133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl
2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara
23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r
Barbara 212011
24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613
25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek
215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek
27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll
Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5
Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~
Soouldm
Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway
29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad
Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route
129~Sau Benito)
PartnershipPr q1etrta
30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~
3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl
0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)
Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)
The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues
Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1
Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue
lributuy to
911109 73281) Sooorna 128
Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges
CreekReplacetnent JrOiect
Russian River
fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128
Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp
Crerk Repla~
Proj~
Maacarna Creek
lt16109 PAOID
requeeret 7fl9f0~
Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay
64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt
Napa River
9 1809 PAD ID
_requested 712910amp
Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting
Creek Ulatis Crook
8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101
1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek
San Francisco
Bay
43009
rAD IDi~~ a
700007
NU7I1gtori uMd to ~
Alameltla
~snrob en
84
Alameda Creek
13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek
Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)
San r1911CiSIo
Bay
Plauningbulllevel assessments
The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007
No Grarm aworded-
The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Progreu Depm-t Jmuary to Decembul009 Purpose
This is 1Mfifth annual report p19PMed in acwrdance with Article 35 ofChapter I ofDivision 1 ofthe Streets and Hgbways Code (SB 857 Kuehl) that look dfeetJanuary 1 2006 1his Jaw directs the Caliomia Department ofTranspot1ation (Department) to prepare 1111 annual ~ort desctibirtgmiddot the status ofthe Depanments pro~on locating assessing and remediating projectrrelatedhametS to fish p~ssage SB 857 aloo directs tbe Department to report itsprcgress on developinJpt progtammatiocnvironmenai~viewp~ess to streamline the permitting process for temooiatin~ fish ~~assage barrier projects
This reportdescribes the Departments fishJmssage1Utivitics bctwe~n Januu-y I and D~ber 31 20reg On September__ 2010 Direct()t McKitn-signed the Memorandum of Url(fT$Utfi1ing A coortlinatfd Appro4Cii to Wtoring Fish PU3sage for Allailromow Salmon ids i1t Coostai Watersheds tJmmg1 Cnarion ofFWt PaJSage F onlltl making the-Depanmllnt a full signatorymemba- ofthe Fish Passage Porum
The Depuimeut isrued a policy memorandum on July 7 2006 from JayNotVeD Chief Division ofEnvironmental Analysis (DBA) 10 District Deputy Directors and othen That memJJtandwn set SB 857 related policy provided a copy ofSB 857 nod provided fish passage asses$Ilent and reporting protocols The DE A mllinteins intemal inlran~ web pages that gtCOntain cop~of various policy memoraoda and gudance tlcluding a pagefor fish passage assessment an aruwal SB 857 repolfulg page md IIpermit streamlining page~lated to deveOping a programmaticmiddot envirorunenM review prooesl TI1ese pages provide e~yaccess to policy and gui~ce
The DcpatJIellt issued a policyupdate memorandum on May 6 2010 from Richard Unl Chief Eqgineer updating progtlllll and reponing requirements plan updates and new reporting schedules The memorandum fotmall~ incorporatesthe elemenlsmiddotofthe KemptonfEng lt~gteement directs districts to update fish passageJllltiS und provides direction for the development -of district fish pa~age remediation
Chanampes in Alwasl Reportin andApproadl
TheDepar1roent ismuking ehangS to the annuat report to address the elements ofhe agreement between Assembtymemba Eng lettef attaclted) Chair offhe Assembly Transportation Cornmiuee aijd Director Kemptctn dated May 26 2009 The twelve changes are
Requested Cltage Prepare an onnual report rlrat describesJuh passage remediation work completed inmiddot the prior calendar peat Januiiry I to December 31 lnelude schedules and focaticms for programmed 1-emedtatiotiS
lmpemerttation Tables 1 and 2 below provide locations ot remedintioos and project schldules for the calendar year from January 1 2009 to December 31 2609
Requested Cha1~ge Deft~ aftshyasY48f1 barrier remediation project aS a projecttifat tires federal or State jwuii(lg and isprogram~Md throug either the State Tra~porlaiiofl lillro~omettf Pragry11 (STP) tJr thNIIIJTr the Sia(l Trtgliwqy (lp~rati01 (fcPlvtect(tJIJ Prog~wn S[IOPP) Include new ccnstnuziots~ rehabilitations repajrs retrOfits alterqtio1JS ornlainlenaiICe prQjetIJ
lmplementaliOn The Department diected that districts use the new proJect definition in project development
Requested Change fdentiJYpartial or completefish passage bullbarriers using tlle definitions In the DFG niQrmal Fish PIIsimiddotage ew~luahonratStretJm CrossingJ
ImplementatiOn TheD~arment directed thal districts fullltlw existing policy tliAt incorporates DFG guidance into the Departments fish passl)ge assegsmentand reporting protocols
Requested Change Ptuvidefish passage asrfS3ment data toprojecl desigil tmgineers
Implementation The Department dircctlld that dilltricta follow standatd practice and policy to asslSS poterttial fisn pasSllgemiddotbatriers llld assur~thatnew designs do lot impede tlsh pasampllge middot
Requ~tedOrange7 Providefoh passage barrier assessme11ts to DFG sa thut asampes3ment9 may be included in theirta(aboJe
Implementation The Department dirme4 that assessments are 3hared with OFG fur input into the OFG Calf ish database system This clatah~ system includes the Passag~ Assessment Database (PAD) which was desi~d in association with~ Fish Passage Forum to house and share fish pllSSage ass=ern data
Reguested Change D(TIIeop remediatiQIplOM in confultr1tion with DFG
lmplemetdatiou The Department directed that districts consult with DFG following stUldard pltldlce during project development
Requested Cha11ge Dcentgn rfjmediation elementS during tkprojecttksign phrne
rmplementl)tion The Department directed that districts llli11QIilation le8i8ltlllUTS
during PJUject design
Req11ested Change CafiStruci remediation elements
Implementation The Department dincted dtat construction ofremtdiation elements that are included in fue final project design Qr-eamptandilrd project dcliveryactivities
Requested Change Provitk notice to DFG when xlrrier~ arc remediated
Implementation The Oepartment verified that notice ofptojeclcompletiltm i~ typically a requifement ofpennits and that the Department contittues to notify DFG as requir~ In permit~
lleque3ted CJumJW CnnlittUemiddotassesWig tulyerts that are nat part rgtfplannedprojecu thrrgtl4gh the use middotofgranJ fimding tp assjst long-tqngeplapning efforts
Implementation The Depamnent contin~es to seek funding furmiddotnonproject remedlations
Requested Cltange Wcufi with DFG tojoittlly identifY highPriority tra11lt1pottation relaferJ fish barrier$ ltJf July 1 2JJJ0 rwliUlnMilllymiddotJI~t~
lmplementatioo The Dcentpl$lwt identified current transportation related priorities shown in Table 4 bei(IW by July l 20I 0 ltllli c9111inues working with Df() 10 develop statewide fish passage barrier priorities
Requested Change Use ttJtJifabkfedcralfimdueceived putsuant to the American Recovery laquond RelnvesmumtJct of2009 to the extent penmucd under felleral7aw
2
Implementation The American RecovCYand RelnvetmentAct of 2009 roqllired that eligible projects be immediateiy remfymiddot to break gtound for construction Tbe Act requirements did not allowtitile for th-~sesstnnntstudeslesign work right-ofway t)OquisiJion or permitlins neecentssaey for xew fish ~sQgeprojects
Aues3ment and Remediation ofFbb Passage liartten
Project-level rernediations sinceJanuarv 2006
Rerneditrtion Summary (7 5projun) The location for Table- I projext_s are shown on Figure I
Tale l ComplriedSalmoaid Fitll Pa11agt Barrier RemodlatUms Sln~ Jbullnaacy 11006
Project llistrlct Couuty Rou~e lostMlle Ptojed Namtbull
1 1 Dcl Norte 101 404 TribuOOy to Elk-Creel
2 I lwnboldt 101 1153 Stone Lagoon
3 I Humboldt LOI 407 ClfaddCmk
1 fendodlUI ~ 814 Rattlt1oalre Ct-sectk1
s ~1Norb1 l 43lgt-458 S111ith RiverWidepm~tltLble Cr~k)
6 2 Siskiyou 96 6_$0-65 5 ONeil Creck middotrribulaty to Xlamath River
7 2 Tehama 5 169 BiderCreek
8 2 Tehama 5 281 Dibble Czeek
9 2 Shusta 299 2075 Snit Croek Sacramento Tributary
10 3 Sierrat 49 40-94 Sittra 49CulV-lt Replacement Yuba
tL 5 Sama JOJ n9 E Ca_pitan Cre~Barbat~ 12 s Sllllta
101 41 Alroyo HondoBarbara
13 5 Santa 101 4719 ~CreekBarbara
14 s Santa Cruz I 10 Valencia Greek Tnbut1ry1o Aptos Creek
15 3 S3nJa CriJt 1 and 17 174-1742 Branclrorte Creek lllld CafiIOletll Creek
lnjcctgt clgtltnpl gtltd In 00~ore lhoWq ll1 bold uwllialtd Tllll
Tbullble z Active Projects witll Fl~h Paua~e
Projlaquot ~- District COunty Ruate lMtMile lgtate 1 Project Name
Culvert Projectsmiddot
I I MendOcino 1 625 DNS Cnlvert ~ilitation
TribUIY to PuddingCreek
2 1 Mendocino I 9283 CCA 1l201 4 Dunn CreeLFish Passage
l MendOdo
Mendocino
101 JJ~-
178~ CCA
11Jfl018 Hoolm~ BvDa
36Culv~4 1 101 f-fultjph CCA
1112012
3 l Mmdoeino 10 84 DNS Rattlesnake Greek
6 l ~ocino 128 3~88 DNS Beebe Storm Dattiage
7 l Mendocino 128 and 253
00shy501
CCA 1lJI20 12
264 Culverts
1tfeoclltKi~ 101 ~ 148 ~ McBriJidlr Credt4
Huiboldt Q 985shylOM
CCA 1001ZOU
1Ud Mouutain Cnek Fbh PatSilfll
10 1 Shbullll 299 3225 CCA 7ti4tzot4
BellaDiddv Lemm reekY
H 4 Mllri11 I 227 CCA 12Jlf2014 Qiacomini middotCr~l
12 4 S~moma l 32A CCA 12t2014 F ott Ross Crecl
13 4 Sonoma I 151-IS~
CCA 1212013 Gleason Beach
14 5 Sante Batbam
l 156 CCA 41112014
SaSipuroes Creek
lS s lialdamp -Barblra
101 0 ~ 9112014 RinconCteelt
lfl 7 Los Anje1es I 503 DNS Sol31iceCred4
Active Projects Summary (32 projeCI6) Thelocation for Table 1 projects are shown on Figure 2
Three new projects were added to this table (project numbers 10 18 and 19) Three projects have projected rompletion dates (CCA dale$) lh~t nave been tXleuded one year (ptpjectnumbers 3 ~and 20 1llree Disbict7 (Vcntuta County) projects were removed from the list(San Antonio Creek Bridge Reptacen1ent Lion Creek and Sisar Creek and Santa Paula ~k1 These sites wtre originaJiy lidded ~ue topotential temporary comtruction issues that have been resolved
tmiddot
4
T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd
]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName
Bridge ll(ljech
17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es
18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013
19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell
~ 211Til014
~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult
I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84
133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl
2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara
23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r
Barbara 212011
24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613
25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek
215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek
27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll
Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5
Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~
Soouldm
Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway
29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad
Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route
129~Sau Benito)
PartnershipPr q1etrta
30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~
3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl
0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)
Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)
The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues
Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1
Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue
lributuy to
911109 73281) Sooorna 128
Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges
CreekReplacetnent JrOiect
Russian River
fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128
Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp
Crerk Repla~
Proj~
Maacarna Creek
lt16109 PAOID
requeeret 7fl9f0~
Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay
64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt
Napa River
9 1809 PAD ID
_requested 712910amp
Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting
Creek Ulatis Crook
8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101
1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek
San Francisco
Bay
43009
rAD IDi~~ a
700007
NU7I1gtori uMd to ~
Alameltla
~snrob en
84
Alameda Creek
13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek
Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)
San r1911CiSIo
Bay
Plauningbulllevel assessments
The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007
No Grarm aworded-
The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Requested Change fdentiJYpartial or completefish passage bullbarriers using tlle definitions In the DFG niQrmal Fish PIIsimiddotage ew~luahonratStretJm CrossingJ
ImplementatiOn TheD~arment directed thal districts fullltlw existing policy tliAt incorporates DFG guidance into the Departments fish passl)ge assegsmentand reporting protocols
Requested Change Ptuvidefish passage asrfS3ment data toprojecl desigil tmgineers
Implementation The Department dircctlld that dilltricta follow standatd practice and policy to asslSS poterttial fisn pasSllgemiddotbatriers llld assur~thatnew designs do lot impede tlsh pasampllge middot
Requ~tedOrange7 Providefoh passage barrier assessme11ts to DFG sa thut asampes3ment9 may be included in theirta(aboJe
Implementation The Department dirme4 that assessments are 3hared with OFG fur input into the OFG Calf ish database system This clatah~ system includes the Passag~ Assessment Database (PAD) which was desi~d in association with~ Fish Passage Forum to house and share fish pllSSage ass=ern data
Reguested Change D(TIIeop remediatiQIplOM in confultr1tion with DFG
lmplemetdatiou The Department directed that districts consult with DFG following stUldard pltldlce during project development
Requested Cha11ge Dcentgn rfjmediation elementS during tkprojecttksign phrne
rmplementl)tion The Department directed that districts llli11QIilation le8i8ltlllUTS
during PJUject design
Req11ested Change CafiStruci remediation elements
Implementation The Department dincted dtat construction ofremtdiation elements that are included in fue final project design Qr-eamptandilrd project dcliveryactivities
Requested Change Provitk notice to DFG when xlrrier~ arc remediated
Implementation The Oepartment verified that notice ofptojeclcompletiltm i~ typically a requifement ofpennits and that the Department contittues to notify DFG as requir~ In permit~
lleque3ted CJumJW CnnlittUemiddotassesWig tulyerts that are nat part rgtfplannedprojecu thrrgtl4gh the use middotofgranJ fimding tp assjst long-tqngeplapning efforts
Implementation The Depamnent contin~es to seek funding furmiddotnonproject remedlations
Requested Cltange Wcufi with DFG tojoittlly identifY highPriority tra11lt1pottation relaferJ fish barrier$ ltJf July 1 2JJJ0 rwliUlnMilllymiddotJI~t~
lmplementatioo The Dcentpl$lwt identified current transportation related priorities shown in Table 4 bei(IW by July l 20I 0 ltllli c9111inues working with Df() 10 develop statewide fish passage barrier priorities
Requested Change Use ttJtJifabkfedcralfimdueceived putsuant to the American Recovery laquond RelnvesmumtJct of2009 to the extent penmucd under felleral7aw
2
Implementation The American RecovCYand RelnvetmentAct of 2009 roqllired that eligible projects be immediateiy remfymiddot to break gtound for construction Tbe Act requirements did not allowtitile for th-~sesstnnntstudeslesign work right-ofway t)OquisiJion or permitlins neecentssaey for xew fish ~sQgeprojects
Aues3ment and Remediation ofFbb Passage liartten
Project-level rernediations sinceJanuarv 2006
Rerneditrtion Summary (7 5projun) The location for Table- I projext_s are shown on Figure I
Tale l ComplriedSalmoaid Fitll Pa11agt Barrier RemodlatUms Sln~ Jbullnaacy 11006
Project llistrlct Couuty Rou~e lostMlle Ptojed Namtbull
1 1 Dcl Norte 101 404 TribuOOy to Elk-Creel
2 I lwnboldt 101 1153 Stone Lagoon
3 I Humboldt LOI 407 ClfaddCmk
1 fendodlUI ~ 814 Rattlt1oalre Ct-sectk1
s ~1Norb1 l 43lgt-458 S111ith RiverWidepm~tltLble Cr~k)
6 2 Siskiyou 96 6_$0-65 5 ONeil Creck middotrribulaty to Xlamath River
7 2 Tehama 5 169 BiderCreek
8 2 Tehama 5 281 Dibble Czeek
9 2 Shusta 299 2075 Snit Croek Sacramento Tributary
10 3 Sierrat 49 40-94 Sittra 49CulV-lt Replacement Yuba
tL 5 Sama JOJ n9 E Ca_pitan Cre~Barbat~ 12 s Sllllta
101 41 Alroyo HondoBarbara
13 5 Santa 101 4719 ~CreekBarbara
14 s Santa Cruz I 10 Valencia Greek Tnbut1ry1o Aptos Creek
15 3 S3nJa CriJt 1 and 17 174-1742 Branclrorte Creek lllld CafiIOletll Creek
lnjcctgt clgtltnpl gtltd In 00~ore lhoWq ll1 bold uwllialtd Tllll
Tbullble z Active Projects witll Fl~h Paua~e
Projlaquot ~- District COunty Ruate lMtMile lgtate 1 Project Name
Culvert Projectsmiddot
I I MendOcino 1 625 DNS Cnlvert ~ilitation
TribUIY to PuddingCreek
2 1 Mendocino I 9283 CCA 1l201 4 Dunn CreeLFish Passage
l MendOdo
Mendocino
101 JJ~-
178~ CCA
11Jfl018 Hoolm~ BvDa
36Culv~4 1 101 f-fultjph CCA
1112012
3 l Mmdoeino 10 84 DNS Rattlesnake Greek
6 l ~ocino 128 3~88 DNS Beebe Storm Dattiage
7 l Mendocino 128 and 253
00shy501
CCA 1lJI20 12
264 Culverts
1tfeoclltKi~ 101 ~ 148 ~ McBriJidlr Credt4
Huiboldt Q 985shylOM
CCA 1001ZOU
1Ud Mouutain Cnek Fbh PatSilfll
10 1 Shbullll 299 3225 CCA 7ti4tzot4
BellaDiddv Lemm reekY
H 4 Mllri11 I 227 CCA 12Jlf2014 Qiacomini middotCr~l
12 4 S~moma l 32A CCA 12t2014 F ott Ross Crecl
13 4 Sonoma I 151-IS~
CCA 1212013 Gleason Beach
14 5 Sante Batbam
l 156 CCA 41112014
SaSipuroes Creek
lS s lialdamp -Barblra
101 0 ~ 9112014 RinconCteelt
lfl 7 Los Anje1es I 503 DNS Sol31iceCred4
Active Projects Summary (32 projeCI6) Thelocation for Table 1 projects are shown on Figure 2
Three new projects were added to this table (project numbers 10 18 and 19) Three projects have projected rompletion dates (CCA dale$) lh~t nave been tXleuded one year (ptpjectnumbers 3 ~and 20 1llree Disbict7 (Vcntuta County) projects were removed from the list(San Antonio Creek Bridge Reptacen1ent Lion Creek and Sisar Creek and Santa Paula ~k1 These sites wtre originaJiy lidded ~ue topotential temporary comtruction issues that have been resolved
tmiddot
4
T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd
]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName
Bridge ll(ljech
17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es
18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013
19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell
~ 211Til014
~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult
I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84
133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl
2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara
23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r
Barbara 212011
24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613
25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek
215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek
27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll
Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5
Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~
Soouldm
Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway
29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad
Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route
129~Sau Benito)
PartnershipPr q1etrta
30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~
3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl
0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)
Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)
The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues
Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1
Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue
lributuy to
911109 73281) Sooorna 128
Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges
CreekReplacetnent JrOiect
Russian River
fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128
Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp
Crerk Repla~
Proj~
Maacarna Creek
lt16109 PAOID
requeeret 7fl9f0~
Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay
64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt
Napa River
9 1809 PAD ID
_requested 712910amp
Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting
Creek Ulatis Crook
8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101
1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek
San Francisco
Bay
43009
rAD IDi~~ a
700007
NU7I1gtori uMd to ~
Alameltla
~snrob en
84
Alameda Creek
13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek
Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)
San r1911CiSIo
Bay
Plauningbulllevel assessments
The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007
No Grarm aworded-
The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Implementation The American RecovCYand RelnvetmentAct of 2009 roqllired that eligible projects be immediateiy remfymiddot to break gtound for construction Tbe Act requirements did not allowtitile for th-~sesstnnntstudeslesign work right-ofway t)OquisiJion or permitlins neecentssaey for xew fish ~sQgeprojects
Aues3ment and Remediation ofFbb Passage liartten
Project-level rernediations sinceJanuarv 2006
Rerneditrtion Summary (7 5projun) The location for Table- I projext_s are shown on Figure I
Tale l ComplriedSalmoaid Fitll Pa11agt Barrier RemodlatUms Sln~ Jbullnaacy 11006
Project llistrlct Couuty Rou~e lostMlle Ptojed Namtbull
1 1 Dcl Norte 101 404 TribuOOy to Elk-Creel
2 I lwnboldt 101 1153 Stone Lagoon
3 I Humboldt LOI 407 ClfaddCmk
1 fendodlUI ~ 814 Rattlt1oalre Ct-sectk1
s ~1Norb1 l 43lgt-458 S111ith RiverWidepm~tltLble Cr~k)
6 2 Siskiyou 96 6_$0-65 5 ONeil Creck middotrribulaty to Xlamath River
7 2 Tehama 5 169 BiderCreek
8 2 Tehama 5 281 Dibble Czeek
9 2 Shusta 299 2075 Snit Croek Sacramento Tributary
10 3 Sierrat 49 40-94 Sittra 49CulV-lt Replacement Yuba
tL 5 Sama JOJ n9 E Ca_pitan Cre~Barbat~ 12 s Sllllta
101 41 Alroyo HondoBarbara
13 5 Santa 101 4719 ~CreekBarbara
14 s Santa Cruz I 10 Valencia Greek Tnbut1ry1o Aptos Creek
15 3 S3nJa CriJt 1 and 17 174-1742 Branclrorte Creek lllld CafiIOletll Creek
lnjcctgt clgtltnpl gtltd In 00~ore lhoWq ll1 bold uwllialtd Tllll
Tbullble z Active Projects witll Fl~h Paua~e
Projlaquot ~- District COunty Ruate lMtMile lgtate 1 Project Name
Culvert Projectsmiddot
I I MendOcino 1 625 DNS Cnlvert ~ilitation
TribUIY to PuddingCreek
2 1 Mendocino I 9283 CCA 1l201 4 Dunn CreeLFish Passage
l MendOdo
Mendocino
101 JJ~-
178~ CCA
11Jfl018 Hoolm~ BvDa
36Culv~4 1 101 f-fultjph CCA
1112012
3 l Mmdoeino 10 84 DNS Rattlesnake Greek
6 l ~ocino 128 3~88 DNS Beebe Storm Dattiage
7 l Mendocino 128 and 253
00shy501
CCA 1lJI20 12
264 Culverts
1tfeoclltKi~ 101 ~ 148 ~ McBriJidlr Credt4
Huiboldt Q 985shylOM
CCA 1001ZOU
1Ud Mouutain Cnek Fbh PatSilfll
10 1 Shbullll 299 3225 CCA 7ti4tzot4
BellaDiddv Lemm reekY
H 4 Mllri11 I 227 CCA 12Jlf2014 Qiacomini middotCr~l
12 4 S~moma l 32A CCA 12t2014 F ott Ross Crecl
13 4 Sonoma I 151-IS~
CCA 1212013 Gleason Beach
14 5 Sante Batbam
l 156 CCA 41112014
SaSipuroes Creek
lS s lialdamp -Barblra
101 0 ~ 9112014 RinconCteelt
lfl 7 Los Anje1es I 503 DNS Sol31iceCred4
Active Projects Summary (32 projeCI6) Thelocation for Table 1 projects are shown on Figure 2
Three new projects were added to this table (project numbers 10 18 and 19) Three projects have projected rompletion dates (CCA dale$) lh~t nave been tXleuded one year (ptpjectnumbers 3 ~and 20 1llree Disbict7 (Vcntuta County) projects were removed from the list(San Antonio Creek Bridge Reptacen1ent Lion Creek and Sisar Creek and Santa Paula ~k1 These sites wtre originaJiy lidded ~ue topotential temporary comtruction issues that have been resolved
tmiddot
4
T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd
]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName
Bridge ll(ljech
17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es
18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013
19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell
~ 211Til014
~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult
I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84
133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl
2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara
23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r
Barbara 212011
24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613
25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek
215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek
27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll
Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5
Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~
Soouldm
Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway
29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad
Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route
129~Sau Benito)
PartnershipPr q1etrta
30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~
3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl
0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)
Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)
The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues
Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1
Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue
lributuy to
911109 73281) Sooorna 128
Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges
CreekReplacetnent JrOiect
Russian River
fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128
Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp
Crerk Repla~
Proj~
Maacarna Creek
lt16109 PAOID
requeeret 7fl9f0~
Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay
64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt
Napa River
9 1809 PAD ID
_requested 712910amp
Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting
Creek Ulatis Crook
8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101
1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek
San Francisco
Bay
43009
rAD IDi~~ a
700007
NU7I1gtori uMd to ~
Alameltla
~snrob en
84
Alameda Creek
13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek
Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)
San r1911CiSIo
Bay
Plauningbulllevel assessments
The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007
No Grarm aworded-
The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Tbullble z Active Projects witll Fl~h Paua~e
Projlaquot ~- District COunty Ruate lMtMile lgtate 1 Project Name
Culvert Projectsmiddot
I I MendOcino 1 625 DNS Cnlvert ~ilitation
TribUIY to PuddingCreek
2 1 Mendocino I 9283 CCA 1l201 4 Dunn CreeLFish Passage
l MendOdo
Mendocino
101 JJ~-
178~ CCA
11Jfl018 Hoolm~ BvDa
36Culv~4 1 101 f-fultjph CCA
1112012
3 l Mmdoeino 10 84 DNS Rattlesnake Greek
6 l ~ocino 128 3~88 DNS Beebe Storm Dattiage
7 l Mendocino 128 and 253
00shy501
CCA 1lJI20 12
264 Culverts
1tfeoclltKi~ 101 ~ 148 ~ McBriJidlr Credt4
Huiboldt Q 985shylOM
CCA 1001ZOU
1Ud Mouutain Cnek Fbh PatSilfll
10 1 Shbullll 299 3225 CCA 7ti4tzot4
BellaDiddv Lemm reekY
H 4 Mllri11 I 227 CCA 12Jlf2014 Qiacomini middotCr~l
12 4 S~moma l 32A CCA 12t2014 F ott Ross Crecl
13 4 Sonoma I 151-IS~
CCA 1212013 Gleason Beach
14 5 Sante Batbam
l 156 CCA 41112014
SaSipuroes Creek
lS s lialdamp -Barblra
101 0 ~ 9112014 RinconCteelt
lfl 7 Los Anje1es I 503 DNS Sol31iceCred4
Active Projects Summary (32 projeCI6) Thelocation for Table 1 projects are shown on Figure 2
Three new projects were added to this table (project numbers 10 18 and 19) Three projects have projected rompletion dates (CCA dale$) lh~t nave been tXleuded one year (ptpjectnumbers 3 ~and 20 1llree Disbict7 (Vcntuta County) projects were removed from the list(San Antonio Creek Bridge Reptacen1ent Lion Creek and Sisar Creek and Santa Paula ~k1 These sites wtre originaJiy lidded ~ue topotential temporary comtruction issues that have been resolved
tmiddot
4
T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd
]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName
Bridge ll(ljech
17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es
18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013
19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell
~ 211Til014
~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult
I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84
133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl
2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara
23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r
Barbara 212011
24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613
25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek
215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek
27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll
Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5
Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~
Soouldm
Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway
29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad
Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route
129~Sau Benito)
PartnershipPr q1etrta
30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~
3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl
0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)
Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)
The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues
Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1
Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue
lributuy to
911109 73281) Sooorna 128
Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges
CreekReplacetnent JrOiect
Russian River
fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128
Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp
Crerk Repla~
Proj~
Maacarna Creek
lt16109 PAOID
requeeret 7fl9f0~
Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay
64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt
Napa River
9 1809 PAD ID
_requested 712910amp
Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting
Creek Ulatis Crook
8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101
1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek
San Francisco
Bay
43009
rAD IDi~~ a
700007
NU7I1gtori uMd to ~
Alameltla
~snrob en
84
Alameda Creek
13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek
Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)
San r1911CiSIo
Bay
Plauningbulllevel assessments
The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007
No Grarm aworded-
The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
T1ble l Aclivelroj ednrilla iisb Pmiddotatsap cootitwtd
]rqject raquostrict ColllltV Ro11te PostMila Date lngtjeetName
Bridge ll(ljech
17 2 Tehama 99 139middot CCA Craig Creek and Sunset 142 7152013 Calllll Brid~es
18 2 Tellllmbull 36 ~ CCA MlCreelt1412013
19 ~ Ttlbull 91 1~9-143 CCA North fork Mill Creell
~ 211Til014
~ CCA TJaifl Dltm Boulevard lO 1 Tiin Z99 Fish Uhdcr LUfe Gran68l 101411011 VaJey Crult
I lmiddot CCA Niles Canyon Safety 21 4 Alameda 84
133 1011013 Improvement Pioject (S1onybrook Creeltl
2Q s Sll11ta 101 22 DNS Carpinteria Creek Barbara
23 s Sanm IQI 55 CltA Nojo~Creek Santa Yne1r
Barbara 212011
24 5 Sanla 192 l55 ceA Arreyo Parida Creek Barbara 6l2613
25 5 Santa Ciuz 1 31S5 DJijS Scott Creek
215 5 SillllaCruz 363 DNS Wadcell Creek
27 7 vemua 150 287 CCA Santa lllula Creek8lmll
Culvert 1111d BridgemiddotProjltt5
Nap CCA Dultil RoadRtal~ 28 4 121 03middot20 10J2014 Curves and Wi~
Soouldm
Sanm 50- Widening of Us ltighway
29 ll Cb rW tOt oo~ CC 1 0 I fromMregtcrty Rgtad
Snn Bettilo 49 101112013 (Sitnta Chua) to State Route
129~Sau Benito)
PartnershipPr q1etrta
30 12 Ot~~llle 5 (3 CalTroul Tmbuco Cteeic ~
3 1 l2 Orange 5ancl
0 CCA San Mateo Creek241 S112018 ~-1009- wlndicoCIIIR boll amp0111 ~reg legtL (lCfCoos(Ncci0lt1 Cu6IOCI Co dionbull DlltSmiddotmiddotOoto NltSltlieollllnlmpl Dolos =esliuttted ~ rllr1ifnalCIil1ina gtad rqulaiQOI uegoflilli New proj CIICICIIO2009 11gtmj hrbull~~aCCA dot_ trojot~bull flgtmle(y bad CCA dob butt mfoon ond cuUr hliYeno pubijf ithodUio(ONS)
Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)
The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues
Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1
Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue
lributuy to
911109 73281) Sooorna 128
Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges
CreekReplacetnent JrOiect
Russian River
fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128
Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp
Crerk Repla~
Proj~
Maacarna Creek
lt16109 PAOID
requeeret 7fl9f0~
Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay
64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt
Napa River
9 1809 PAD ID
_requested 712910amp
Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting
Creek Ulatis Crook
8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101
1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek
San Francisco
Bay
43009
rAD IDi~~ a
700007
NU7I1gtori uMd to ~
Alameltla
~snrob en
84
Alameda Creek
13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek
Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)
San r1911CiSIo
Bay
Plauningbulllevel assessments
The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007
No Grarm aworded-
The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Prvject-LewtlSurveys (Capital-funded VYJrk)
The Department Dl5trict 4 San Prauslscc Bily uea cq~pJe1ed six Fish passag~assessments in 2009 th8t indicated potential batTier issues
Table 2009 Caltrans Dlsttln 4 fis1J piiiUMe ISS~tnmeot Iocatioa1
Date lAD1D1 Coullfy Route Pcbt ProjectNaiM StnAIIlM Ue
lributuy to
911109 73281) Sooorna 128
Malcama Creek illd Redwood Maacama173 Crtek Bridges
CreekReplacetnent JrOiect
Russian River
fl1109 732_816 Sonoma 128
Maacama Creek and Redwood Redwood2L8 Creek Bridg~~amp
Crerk Repla~
Proj~
Maacarna Creek
lt16109 PAOID
requeeret 7fl9f0~
Napu 12) Tulucay Creek Tulucay
64-65 Bridge CreekReplaCCIWlllt
Napa River
9 1809 PAD ID
_requested 712910amp
Solano 80 AliJno Drive Alamo 248 Onramp Len~ttbeting
Creek Ulatis Crook
8a5ltl9 73378lt1 San Mateo 101
1630shy 101 Broadway Ea3ton i7o6 lnletcbange Creek
San Francisco
Bay
43009
rAD IDi~~ a
700007
NU7I1gtori uMd to ~
Alameltla
~snrob en
84
Alameda Creek
13-136 Sridge Alameda Feplacement Creek
Proiect c [lro CALFISHmiddot~ WestDati-(PAD)
San r1911CiSIo
Bay
Plauningbulllevel assessments
The Dep111tment has completed Reconnaissance Survey on more than 520Q anatiroiOOMS fishshybearing coastal road-stream crossings and completed Detailed Surveys on more than 775 of the5e crossings Current estimateamp suggest that an additional 4400 Reconnaissance Surveys and an additional 24)0 Detailed Surveys will be needed Ptiorities for planning-level fish passage assessment were identified ltlCCording to llle planning document PtioritiltlltioiFofFish Passage S11111eys on State Hlgiway System Road-Stream Cr~ssings fn Californiil_s CQPvtal Watersheds March 2007
No Grarm aworded-
The Departtnent continues to seek funding to complete Detailed Surveys where needed Detailed Surveys will detennine tile species and life stages that may be inhibited from passage and provide data tbat will be used to determine remediation prioritieJJ
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
The rJepartment submitted a 2009-1 0 grant propOsai to theDFG Fisheries Restoration Grant PTogram The proposal requested funding to obtain rights-of-entry and conduct detailed surveys at high-priority crossin_gs to be selected from the Dqmtment-DFG fisb passage priority list that is UJder development The proposal IM not funded TheDep~entwill submita 201 0-U grant application willl additional Information ampased on the filllll priority Jist
The Department requested State Jlannlngand ResearCh (SP~ grant funds to continue fi$lr pmage assessment gturveys The SPR progrnmh~ twogrant objectiv~ related to planning (SPampl) and research (SPR2) activities The ongltgting and hmg tenn fish passage assessment project no longer fits the goals and objectives ofthe SPR funding requirements
Annual Bardell PrioriH
Priority LiRt (21 cPrusings) T1te location for Table 4 projects ure shown ou Figure 3
Table4461tains road-stream a-ossings that the Department considm high priority fat remediation All listed CJOSsingshave equalpriority at this time however the Department and DFG oontinuc working towards a combined transportatlon-rehllcd fish passage remediation priority list The Departmcntand DFG are wonung with the Fish Passage Jlonini to develop a statewide teclmical fish passage banier priority ranking system
tabla 4 2010 C11ltmns TranbullportbulltlonmiddotRaalad Fish PMaag~Barrier Remediation PrloriUes
Ofatrict County Route Pot
SI~ Name Strem TriMitary
1 Mendocino 101 5225 s Fork Rvan Creek RvanCreek Outlet Cree~ 1 Mendocino 101 4814 Up~ Creek Upp CrMk Mill Cree~ 1 Dei Norte 197 500 Sultan Creek Sulean Creek Smith Riller
1 Humboldt 254 418 Fish Creek Ave_ of
Rfh Creek s_ Fori Eel RiverlheGJants
2 Tehamlt~ 5 2810 DibbleCmek Dibble Creek Sactamento
RiVet
2 SiskifOU 96 660shyONeil Creek 0 1Nen Creek Klamath River655 Yank Creek - CQWmiddotCreek
2 Shasta 299 3220 (1-emo~~eek Yank CrMk sacramento Bnd River
68()shy Llille GriSS Valley L~tle Gra~~ G(tiss Vlt~lley
2 Trinity 29il 682 Creek Valley Creek Creelil T rfnlty River
121- Niles Cyn Saf$ty Stonybrook4 Alameda 84
13~ lmProvement Creek AlaiT]eda Creek
(Stooybrool( Cteak 64- Tlllucay Creek
4 Napa 121 55 Bridge Tutultay Creek Napa RIVer
6 Sama
1 1561 Sal$lpuedes Creek Salsipuedes Sanll Ynez River Ba$Ua Cleek
5 Santa 101 2 20 Carpinteria Creek Carpinteria Creek Pacific OceanB3Ibara
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Programmade EDironmeotal Review ProeeM
Agency Amements
The 1gtli)artlncntcontinue$ wofAillg witbDFG the Nltilgtnal Oceanic and Atnwspheric Ailministration National Marirte Fisheries Service ~IPS) andmiddot(he US Fish and Wildlife Seryice (USFWS) to negot~ streamlined enVironmental review and pemlittingprocyQures to improve aamph passage remediation The agencies met to develop prof1amlnatic envitorunentnl t~tnhorizations fur activities that eat1 be c~ as routine maintenance end for small projeds hat improve or provide fish passage ROiit1le maintenance includes cUlvert repair cllvett cleaning and vegetation management Small-lmpact projects that typically include fish p~s~ge remediation efforts ioolude culvert installation weir and baffle inslilfatiotJ and small bridge construction middot
The- geographic scopemiddotoflhis proamprtammatic 1Ytementncludes coastal drainages from the Oregon bordllr to Santa Cruz County The agrccmeQt requires consultation on approxitruttely 58 planlspecies and 33 fl$h and wildWe-speeies that ll1lly beaffucted Federal agencies prepared biologicnl assessments to proviile supporting doltIIlentatioo for their proposed actions The administrative draft ofthe biological assessment for NMFS was rmewe4 Pinal modifications and an analysis of the projected ext~Qfincidental talce have been incotpof3ied into the document After reproduction is compJeto the Dioiog1CI) BSsessroents will be transroihed ro the fedll31 trustee ageociesfotreview
Tllble ltt 2010 Cilllrans TraneparttlaRalatMI Fleh Pa~~aage BatTier Remedlellan Priarlti contlnuMI
Dibull trt ColihfV Rc~lemiddot Poat MUe SltfNa- SituIn ntbutbullrv
5 Santa Safbara 101 223shy
middot230 San Pedro Creek San Pedro Creek Goteta Slough
5 Santa Barbara 192 15~ Arrqjo Parlda Arryo Paridi Paclfoc Ocean
7 Los
Angeles 5030 SoiSiice Creekmiddot Solstloe Cree4t Paciflc Ocean
7 Ventura 126 2648 Hopper Creek Hopper Creek Santa Clara River
7 VenIJra 126 2881 Piru Creek Plfl Creek Santa Clara River
7 Ventura 160 2870 Santa Paula Creek Santa Paui
Creel S-tnta Clara River
11 San0ieyl) 76 2946 SR-76 Pauma ~eek
Pauma Creek San LuisRey River
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Figure 1 Completed Fish Pa5sage Barrier Remediations Since
January 1 2006
Note Numbers correspond to project numbers in Tabie 1
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
Figure 2 Active Fish Passage Projects
--middot----
Note Numbers corrnpond to project numbers in Table 2
10
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0
bull 0
Figure 3 Caltrans 2010 Transportation Related Fi$h
Passage Barrier 1 Remediation Priority
Nota Numbers corre5p0nd to project numbers in Tabla 4o
I I
0