Coalition in Criminal Justice
description
Transcript of Coalition in Criminal Justice
![Page 1: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Coalition in Criminal Justice
Adolescent and police interactions in London
Jeffrey DeMarco, PhD Candidate, Centre for Criminology and Sociology
![Page 2: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Aims and Objectives
Ethnographic Power and hierarchies
Interpretive Antagonism versus improvements Generalizability and transferability
Quantitative Trust in the police Behavioural intentions
![Page 3: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Background
Volunteer organization for adolescents aged 14-19
Training for leadership and inclusion roles within community
Instil discipline, knowledge and philanthropy
Develop team-work, healthy competition and co-operation
Interactions with police and other community leaders
![Page 4: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background characteristics
Over 200 young men and women
58% were male average age of 15.7 years 1/3 were of BME background
49 % single parent homes 49 % had parental unemployment in the household
Over 1/5 claimed that they had poor parental relationships conflict in the house, lack of praise, unawareness of behaviour and activities
20% frequently were truant whilst 23% had been excluded from formal education
![Page 6: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Engagement through observation
Power as a tool for good Youth-facilitators Peer leader-youth Youth-youth
Foucauldian Discipline Structure
Therapeutic alliance (Brodin, 1975) Bonds Tasks Goals
![Page 7: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Trust in the police
Improper policing
Faith/belief
Troubled relations
Negative perceptions
Improvement
External antagonists
![Page 8: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Trust in Authority Questionnaire (TAQ)
15-item measure Three sub-scales: TAQ General TAQ Authority TAQ police
Reliability Internal consistency α = 0.81 Inter-rater α = 0.90
Validity
Mass administration to come MPA Europol? Interpol?
![Page 9: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Associations
Quality of contact TAQ Police r = -0.28** TAQ Overall r = -0.24**
Police attitudes TAQ Police r = -0.43** TAQ Overall r = -0.43**
Psychopathology Conduct Disorder r = 0.36** Overall r = 0.30**
![Page 10: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Intentions to co-operate
Police Interactions TAQ Police TAQ Overall
Call the police -0.24* -0.24*
Interact if mugged -0.21* -0.16
Knife Crime -0.33** -0.23*
Overall interaction with police
-0.25** -0.17
![Page 11: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Predictive trust model
Trust in the police
r² = 0.474
Quality β = -.42
Attitudesβ = -.17
Conduct Disorder β = .29
![Page 12: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Implications
Baseline and follow-up for community programs
Comparison group outside of police Dissertation contains qualitative output from other focus groups
Funding/Expansion of community engagement programs Navy cadets, Project Trident
Intergroup contact Optimal conditions to ameliorate the aforementioned issued
Vicarious trust—proxy police
![Page 13: Coalition in Criminal Justice](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050809/5681657b550346895dd81003/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Conclusions and steps forward
Difficult relationship
Installation of authority
Promising positive interactions
Possibility of using other professionals Expansion of cadets?