Coalescer.pdf
-
Upload
rajesh-krishnamoorthy -
Category
Documents
-
view
92 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Coalescer.pdf
Classification: Statoil Internal Status: Draft
Erfaringer med Compact Electrostatic Coalescer (CEC)
Felttesting på Glitne
Einar Eng Johnsen, Statoils forskningssenter, Trondheim
Separasjonsteknologi 2007, Sola, 26. september 2007
2
Outline of presentation
•What is electrostatic coalescers; principles; what do we gain?
•Project history (CEC) – from 1993 till today
•Glitne: Find, fluid characterisation, laboratory and flow loop tests,
installation of CEC on Petrojarl I
•Test of CEC at Glitne – conditions, results, experiences
•Summary, conclusions
3
How does electrostatic coalescers work?
•Droplets become polarized and are attracted to each other
• In AC fields small droplets vibrate and move, causing collisions
•Emulsifying films are distorted and weaken
•Smaller water droplets coalesce into large droplets
•Promotes faster settling or separation of water from oil
•Coalescence rate is dependent on flow conditions (turbulence)
4
Typical flow schematics for CEC system
< 30-40%WC
WELL
STREAM
GAS
OIL
TO
EXPORT
2-PHASE or3-PHASE
SEPARATOR
OIL/WATER
SEPARATOR
CEC
LC
LC
PC
WATER
< 30-40%WC
GAS BLEED
< 0.5 % WC
5
Why compact electrostatic coalescers?
Conventional electrostatic coalescers:
The largest vessels in the process facilities
Compact electrostatic coalescers:
Inline droplet growth + small gravity vessel
6
CEC™ Technology History
1980’s
1993
1996
1997
1998
2000
2000
2001
2002
Time
Research at
University of
Southampton
Cooperation
with Statoil
and BP
KPS joined
as
commercial
partner
Onshore
testing
KPS
(Calgary)
Feasibility
study for
Statoil’s
Yme field
Onshore
testing
Multi Phase
Flow Loop
Norsk Hydro
(Porsgrunn,
Norway)
FIRST
Offshore Pilot at
PGS
Production’s
“Petrojarl I”,
Statoil’s
Glitne field
Demo2000
JIP for
subsea
applications
Topside
JIP
expanded
with more
oil
companies
Statoil
BP KPSUoS
Norsk Hydro
ChevronTexaco
Glitne licence,
(Statoil & PGS)
• Commercial rights was transferred from Statoil to KPS
after successful product qualification.
• STATOIL is owner of the technology.
Photo: Øyvind Hagen, Statoil
2005
Installation on:
Chevron Captain
Marathon
Alvheim
Technology
maturity
7
Principle sketch:
High voltage
electrodes coatedon both sides
Ground: Bare
steel plates
CECTM internals
•Turbulent flow combined with electric field
•Adjustable field strength
•Drop diameter growth:> 10 times
•Settling tank downstream
8
Glitne field development• Stand-alone development of marginal oil field in the Sleipner area
• 32 °API oil, asphalthenes 1.8 wt-%, water salinity 7.5%
• Contract awarded to PGS in 2000 for offshore production with Petrojarl 1 FPSO
• Focus on oil quality - modifications in the separation train
• Process consists of both conventional coalescer and a pilot CEC
• First oil in August 2001.
Oil production 7080 Sm3/d April 2002; 1340 Sm3/d September 2007
• Water production started April 2002; 8350 Sm3/d September 2007
9
Emulsion characterization of Glitne crude
• Laboratory tests prior to selection of
production concept showed
� very stable emulsions without
addition of demulsifier
� slow foam decay
• New samples taken after start-up show
similar results, but:
� different results from different samples
High pressure separation rig
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Time, min.
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
% water separated
50% WC
20% WC
Glitne separation, no demulsifier
Separator: 3 bar, 60C
P res s ure drop: 12 bar
Oil bubble point: 4 bar, 60 C
Water bubble point: 4 bar, 60 C
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Time, min.
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
% W
ater separated
20% WC
10% WC
Glitne separation with 50ppm demulsifier
S e pa ra tor: 3 ba r, 60C
P re s s ure drop: 12 ba r
O il bubble point: 4 ba r, 60 C
Wa te r bubble point: 4 ba r, 60 C
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
seconds
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
volume, ml
Foam decay, glitne crude oil
Crude bubble point: 4 bar, 60 C
Separator conditions : 1 bar, 60 C
Watercut: 10 %
Pres s uredrop: 14 bar
50 ppm demuls ifier
10
Onshore testing with Glitne crudeGravity Separator Oil Outlet Quality
as function of time and CEC ON vs OFF
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
14,0
16,0
18,0
20,0
08:24 09:00 09:36 10:12 10:48 11:24 12:00
Point of time
Outlet Oil Quality - W
iO [vol-%]
Statoil's Glitne crude oil
20% Inlet Watercut
No chemicals
Top ~70 oC
Pop ~5,5 bar g
~4 min separator oil residence
time
Time: Description:
Up to ~10.10: CEC ON
From ~10.10: CEC OFF
From ~11.40: Very unstable
loop
conditions
Test ref. B9-10
11
Compact coalescer at Glitne
Nominal flow capacity: 65000 bpd (10330 m3/d)
12
Glitne processPRODUCER
218 bar
1st stage
separator
Test separator
2nd stage
separator
Conventional electrostatic coalescer
CEC
Crude to storage
14 barg
1 bargFROM
2nd
STAGE
SEP.
CENTRIFUGAL
PUMPS
COMPACT
ELECTROSTATIC
COALESCER
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR AND/OR
UP-FLOW ELECTROSTATIC COALESCER
TO LP FLARE
TO CARGO
TO EFFLUENT
WATER
S2
S4 S6
S5
S1
S3
CEC OFF
CEC ON
SP3
SP3
Visualisation of results
CEC OFF
CEC ON
SP3SP3SP3SP3
SP3SP3SP3SP3
Visualisation of results
13
Sampling point S3
S3
14
Glitne - Oil quality downstream CEC
CEC OFF
CEC ON
SP3
SP3
Visualisation of results
CEC OFF
CEC ON
SP3SP3SP3SP3
SP3SP3SP3SP3
Visualisation of results
Glitne CEC™ Unit test
Proof of droplet growth in CEC™ Unit
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Inlet WC to CEC (SP2) [vol-%]
WC in the middle of CEC outlet piping (SP3) [vol-%] CEC ON Nov02
CEC ON Feb03
CEC OFF Nov02
CEC OFF Feb03
Linear
15
Oil quality downstream settling tank (trad. coalescer)
•Tests without voltage on in traditional coalescer:
Always < 0.3 % BS&W for all tested water cuts (1-21 %)
Photo: Øyvind Hagen, Statoil
CEC™ Unit
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
TO LP FLARE
TO CRUDE
COOLERS &
EXPORT
TO
EFFLUENT
WATER
S2
S4
Photo: Øyvind Hagen, Statoil
CEC™ Unit
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
TO LP FLARE
TO CRUDE
COOLERS &
EXPORT
TO
EFFLUENT
WATER
CEC™ Unit
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
TO LP FLARE
TO CRUDE
COOLERS &
EXPORT
TO
EFFLUENT
WATER
CEC™ Unit
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
TO LP FLARE
TO CRUDE
COOLERS &
EXPORT
TO
EFFLUENT
WATER
CEC™ Unit
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
TO LP FLARE
TO CRUDE
COOLERS &
EXPORT
TO
EFFLUENT
WATER
S2
S4
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
CEC Inlet WC (S2) [vol-%]
Oil quality from separator [vol %] CEC 'run alone' - S4
Requirement: < 0.3 % wio
16
GLITNE COALESCER TEST, WEEK 28/2002
Coalescer inlet & outlet watercut as function of time
Coalescers ON/OFF & CEC with coated el
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
00:00 04:48 09:36 14:24 19:12 00:00 04:48 09:36 14:24 19:12 00:00 04:48 09:36 14:24 19:12 00:00 04:48
Point of time
Inlet WIO [vol-%]
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Coalescer Inlet WC
Coalescer outlet WC
2 per. Mov. Avg. (Coalescer Inlet WC)
Outlet W
IO [vol-%
]WiO inlet/outlet of CEC
17
Field tests 2006New adjustable power supply from Magtech
•Robustness short circuits
•Dynamics, speed
•Easy to install sub-sea
WELL
STREAM
GAS
OIL
TO EXPORT
< 0.3 % wio
2-PHASE or
3-PHASESEPARATOR
OIL/WATER
SEPARATORCECTM unit
WATER
GAS BLEED
18
Field test June 2006
• New voltage controller from
Magtech to be tested
• Comparison with Variac
– No difference in oil quality
• Short circuiting much less
frequent with new voltage
controller0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
UcecHV (Vrms)
WiO (%)
19
Inlet water cut and outlet BS&W vs timeBased on daily reports
20
Summary
•Compact electrostatic coalescer (CEC) has been working on Glitne,
Petrojarl since 2002
•With all tested water cuts (< 21 %) there is less than 0.3 % BS&W
•Combined with the secondary coalescer there is less than 0.2 % BS&W
•Combined with active voltage controller optimum performance with
regard to oil quality and maintenance can be obtained
In general:
•Large potential for weight reductions and/or process optimzation by
applying CEC