CO2 Capture using Nanoparticle-based Ionic Materials...
Transcript of CO2 Capture using Nanoparticle-based Ionic Materials...
Ah-Hyung Alissa ParkEarth and Environmental Engineering & Chemical Engineering
Lenfest Center for Sustainable EnergyColumbia University
Sustainable Fuels from CO2, H2O and Carbon-Free EnergyMay 4th, 2010
CO2 Capture using Nanoparticle-based Ionic Materials (NIMs)
Projected Global Energy Demand & Supply
The world energy demand is projected to increase by over 40% in the next two decades
Fossil Fuels will remain the dominant source
Coal-fired Power Plants
Our Research Goals
Use domestic energy sources to achieve energy independence with environmental sustainability
Use carbon neutral energy sources such as biomass & MSW
Integrate carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies into the energy conversion systems CCS
Gasoline
Diesel
Fossil
Nuclear
Solar
Biomass
Wind ,Hydro
Jet Fuel
Heat
Electricity
Ethanol
Methanol
DME
Hydrogen
Chemicals
Geo Municipal Solid
Wastes
Gasoline
Diesel
Jet Fuel
Heat
Electricity
Ethanol
DME
Hydrogen
Chemicals
Municipal Solid
Wastes
Wind ,Hydro
Geo
Biomass
Nuclear
Solar
Fossil
Carbon
Gas
Refining
Synthesis
CO2
Gasification-Based Energy Production System Concepts
Sulfur By-Product
Fly Ash By-Product
Slag By-Product
Steigel and Ramezan, 2006
Petroleum-based vs. Synthetic Liquid Fuels
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Cru
de O
il Pr
ice
($/B
arre
l)
US$ of the day (Nominal) 2003 US$ (Real)
Crude oil prices once again at 1973 levels
Steynberg, (2006)
$81.81 (04/28/10)
Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Options
• Necessary Characteristics- Capacity and price
- Environmentally benign fate
- Stability
Separation Transportation Sequestration
CO2 Removal
Carbon Capture Schemes
Source: NETL, 2008
• From concentrated sources vs. diffuse sources
• Integrated Carbon Capture Technologies
• Most widely employed CO2 capture method isusing
(Goff et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004)
• Concerns with Amine Scrubbing Technology
1.High parasitic energy penalty
2.High cost - capital and operating
3.Corrosion & degradation (due to SO2, O2, particulate, etc)
4.High vapor pressure leads to fugitive emissions
Typical Amine Scrubbing Process
Carbon Capture
10
Carbon Capture Schemes
Source: NETL, 2008
• From concentrated sources vs. diffuse sources
• Integrated Carbon Capture Technologies
What is NIMS?Nanoparticle Ionic Materials
A Nanoscale Analogue to Ionic Liquids
Nanoparticle Ionic Corona
+ =
NIMS advantages
• Zero Vapor Pressure
• >600 counter ions affiliated with a single nanoparticle(unlike ionic liquids where each ion is the source of a single bearing CO2 capture site)
• Ionic coronas forming the Canopy are forced to distort their natural conformations to fill in the space between the cores.
• Such Entropic Frustration can be relieved by addition of solute (e.g. CO2), enhancing the overall solvation.
Synthesis of NIMs
CH3O
OO
CH3
NH2
CH3
xy:
Molecular Weight (Mw): 600 ~ 2000
OHOH
OH
OH
OHOH
OH
OH
Average 5-12 chains/nm2
Polymer Silica NIMS+ →
=
7 nm(dia.) Silica average surface area: 345 m2/g12nm(dia.) Silica average surface area: 220 m2/g22 nm(dia.) Silica average surface area: 140 m2/g (Ref.:Sigma-aldrich)
Estimation of Corona Density
Average diameter 7 nm
Average 7.8 chains/nm2
Average diameter 12 nm Average diameter 22 nm
Average 5 chains/nm2Average 12 chains/nm2
Corona Density = f [Hydroxyl ions of Silica]
Corona fraction
HSQC Spectra (Polyetheramine)
1 2 3 4 5
6
78
9
H9
H6
H8H7
H1
C6C9
C8
C1
C7
Jeffamine M-600 (Mw. 600)
*Up (Red): CH or CH3*Down (Blue): CH2
Jeffamine M-600 in DMSO-d6
H8‒C8
H7‒C7
H7‒C7
H9‒C9
NIMS (7 nm SiO2 with Jeffamine M-600) in DMSO-d6
C1
1 2 3 4 5
6
78
9
NIMS (Mw. 600, 7 nm)Ionic Bond
H6, H9
H1
C6, C9
SO3O3S
SO3
SO3SO3
SO3O3S
O3S
HSQC Spectra (NIMS)
H6‒C6/H9‒C9
H7‒C7
H8‒C8
The peaks were deshielded (1H shifted to higher ppm region) due to the approach of oxygen atoms in sulfonate group by the formation of Ionic Bonds
*Up (Red): CH or CH3*Down (Blue): CH2
** ElectronegativityO: 3.44N: 3.04
TGA: Improved Thermal Stability
TEM: Mono-dispersed, Non-agglomerated nanoparticles
ATR-IR: Counter Ions Grafted on Surface of Nanoparticles
7 nm core 12 nm core 22 nm core
CO2 capture by NIMS:Characterization of Different Core Size NIMs
Water bath
Scheme of experimental setup
19
P
T
Holder for thin layer samples
(at equilibrium and low pressure)
sample
Effects of T and P on CO2 Capture by NIMs
• >95% of capacity in 20 min• Equilibrium in 50 min
(35℃, PCO2=0.31 MPa)
• Negligible effect of core Size• Pressure ↑CO2 absorption ↑• Temperature↑ CO2 absorption↓
(35℃, PCO2 = 0.07-0.34 MPa)
(25℃-65 ℃, PCO2=0.31 MPa)
(35℃, PCO2=0.31MPa)
Regeneration of NIMs
• Regenerated under vacuum for 20 min• A multi-cycle test:
Regenerated NIMS shows SAME CO2 capacity as a fresh sample
Vacuum
(25℃, PCO2=0.31MPa)
CO2 Capture Mechanism of NIMs
1. Molecular Interaction btw. functional groups and CO2
e.g., Lewis interaction btw. anion and CO2, other chemisorption (i.e. ‒NH2)
2. Molecular Structuree.g., Free volume for physisorption of CO2
Attenuated Total Refraction (ATR) FTIR and NMR Experiment
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and 2D NMR Experiment Volume vs Temperature measurement, ATR IR
NMR and ATR FTIR Spectra of NIMS with CO2
200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Chemically absorbed CO2
ppm
Physically absorbed CO2
13C NMR result of NIMS with CO2(@ 25 ℃ and 5 bar)
CO2
3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500Wavenumber (cm-1)
Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) IR results of NIMS with CO2(@ 25 ℃ and 10 bar)
ATR FTIR Measurement
3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500Wavenumber (cm-1)
2400 2380 2360 2340 2320 2300 2280
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Abso
rban
ce
Wavenumber (cm-1)
1300 1200 1100 1000 9000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Abso
rban
ce
Wavenumber (cm-1)
680 670 660 650 640 630
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
Abso
rban
ce
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Lewis Acid-Base Interaction
SiO2
Vapor CO2
NIMS + CO2
<ν2 Bending Mode Region>
<Curve Fit Spectrum of ν2 Bending Mode Region>
NIMS + CO2: Eliminating Degeneracy of CO2 Bending Mode
Time (Minute)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
P/P
o, %
70
80
90
100 #1 (16 hr,0.05g)#2 (16 hr,0.05g)#3 (16 hr,0.05g)#4 (16 hr,0.05g)#5 (16 hr,0.05g)#6 (16 hr,0.05g)#7 (16 hr,0.05g)#8 (16 hr,0.05g) #2 (8 hr,0.1g)[BMIM]PF6 (12 hr,0.1g)[BMIM]BF4 (8 hr,0.1g)TSIL (16 hr,0.05g)30% MEA (16 hr,0.05g)
30 % MEA (0.05g)
NIMS #2 (0.1g)
NIMS #2 (0.05g)
TSIL (0.05g)
[BMIM]PF6 (0.05g)
[BMIM]BF4 (0.05g)
Comparison of CO2 Capture by NIMS & other media
• NIMS#2 made with Diamine polymer
• 0.05 g of NIMS at 300K and 2 atm
• TSIL: [HNH2MPL] NTF
NIMS#2 is a NIMS made with diamine polymer
Viscosicty = f [size of core, MW of polymer, ratio of core to polymer]
CO2 Capture by NIMS#2: Effect of Temperature
(NIMS #2, 0.05 g of NIMS, 2 atm)
Time (Minute)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
P/P
o %
80
85
90
95
100
300K305K310K315K320K 330K340K350K360K
Temperature Absorption
27oC
87oC
• Higher temperature reduces viscosity while physisorptiondecreases.
• Up to 57oC, initial reaction rates remain similar.
• Potential to operate at high temperature.
57oC
Future directions
• Development of Multifunctional smart particles (e.g. capture carbon and sulfur at the same time)
• Integrated systems (e.g. chemical looping technologies, ZECA, and enhanced WGS using mineral carbonation)
• Process intensification and flexibility (production of heat, electricity, chemicals and fuels (e.g. hydrogen and liquid fuels) in any combination
Acknowledgement
The NIMs part of this project is supported by Award No. KUS-C1-018-02, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) as a part of the Global Research Partnership Center led by Cornell University.
Thank you