¿Cómo preparar una propuesta COST?€¦ · 17 1. Identify cases of interest amenable according to...
Transcript of ¿Cómo preparar una propuesta COST?€¦ · 17 1. Identify cases of interest amenable according to...
¿Cómo preparar una propuesta COST?Towards understanding and modelling intense
electronic excitation
2
Website & Social Networks
http://www.cost-ca17126.industriales.upm.es /
@ca17126
3
TUMIEE’s Members
28 COST Member Countries1 Cooperating Member Country2 COST Near Neighbour Countries
206researchers
4
TUMIEE’s overview
CSO approval: 13/04/2018
Start Date: 12/09/2018 End Date: 11/09/2022
Five Grant Periods:
1st Grant Period: 12/09/2018 – 30/04/2019 (Budget: 110.975 €)
2nd Grant Period: 01/05/2019 – 30/04/2020 (Budget: 134.768,50 €)
3rd Grant Period: 01/05/2020 – 30/04/2021
4th Grant Period: 01/05/2021 – 30/04/2022
5th Grant Period: 01/05/2022 – 11/09/2022
5
1ST Grant Period
Kick-off meeting
Brussels
12 Sept. 2018
6
1ST Grant Period
General Meeting & MC Meeting
Madrid
19-20 Nov. 2018
7
1ST Grant Period
Working Group Meeting
Porto
3 March 2019
8
1ST Grant Period
10 STSM
9
2nd Grant PeriodPlanned Activities
Training school (10 days – 28 participants) >14 STSMsA general meeting
10
Q3: Difficult to understand progress beyond state of the art
Q6: Discuss impact on existing scientific communities, e.g., bio synergies
Q7: Plan to involve relevant industrial partners
Q9: Reduce risks by technological cases of interest identified by industry
Q11: Add risk mitigation strategies
Q12: ECI involvement poorly described
Q13: Difficult to judge about the expertise of the network, identify gaps
COST CA17126 – TUMIEESubmission and Evaluation 1 (of 2)
11
12
Enable breakthrough scientific developments leading to new concepts and productsConnecting scientific communitiesProviding opportunities for ECIs Increasing impact on policy makers
2.1. The COST framework: mission and policies
13
COST funds networking activities; it does not fund research .
2.2. COST Actions
14
My point of view: Present an ambitious scientific project To be carried out by means of networkingShow how networking will be implemented
2.2. COST Actions
15
Develop and experimentally validate a computational methodology to simulate the physical phenomena and the resulting effects that occur upon materials irradiation in intense electronic excitation conditions, paying special attention to smart strategies to combine solutions for restricted scopes (timescales) into a functional multiscale formalism
COST CA17126 – TUMIEEMain Challenge
16
Case Focus on
Laser-induced plumeformation
Ionization, hydrodynamics
Laser-generated particlebeams
Ionization, non-termal emission
Nuclear materials Electron-lattice coupling, permanenteffects
Ultra-fast optics Electron dynamics
Medical therapy Energy deposition, charge emission
Medical image Energy deposition
There are many other relevant cases, which, depending on theapplication, will require to put the focus on different aspects affecting the simulationstrategy, in particular, code coupling to cover different timescales
Ene
rgy
dens
ity
COST CA17126 – TUMIEECases of interest
17
1. Identify cases of interest amenable according to scientific and/or industrial relevance.
2. Establish and optimize interfaces between the computational methods (timescales) with validation strategies
3. Identify appropriate strategies to tackle the cases of interestfor every timescale and ways to couple them
4. Take advantage of achievements to tackle other cases of interest
5. Transfer knowledge and code to industry integrating ECIs
6. Disseminate the achievements, develop standard codes in open repositories
COST CA17126 – TUMIEEObjectives
18
COST CA17126 – TUMIEEStructure
19
Position Leader Co-leaderSTSM Coordinator Tzveta Apostolova Biljiana GakovicTraining School Coordinator N. Papadogiannis Layla Martin-SamosScience Communication Manager Helder CrespoWG 1 – Experimental Zoltán Juhász Klaus SokolowskiWG 2 – Electronic excitation Davide Sangalli Myrta GrüningWG 3 – Electron lattice coupling Stephen Fahy Samuel MruphyWG 4 – Macroscopic effects Flyura Djurabekova Teresa Flores-AriasWG 5 – Technology transfer Andrey Solov’yov Philippe Zeitoun
ChairAntonio Rivera
Vice ChairJorge Kohanoff
GH Scientific RepresentativeEduardo Oliva
COST CA17126 – TUMIEEStructure
20
Be anonymous. Do not exceed space limitations.
>5 countries but keep balances (geographical, gender, ECIs, ITCs)
Technical annex Use an example along the document Clear challenge + clear objectives Clear progress beyond the state-of-the-art Added value of networking Identify the impact, how to measure it and risks
Clear work plan, emphasize the role of the network
Fulfill the list of S&T Excellence criteria (e.g., Q1 – is the challenge relevant and timely?)
3.2. Eligibility criteria
21
3.2. Eligibility criteria
S&T EXCELLENCE CRITERIASoundness of the Challenge
Q1 - Is the challenge relevant and timely?
Q2 - Are the objectives presented clear and pertinent to tackle the challenge?
Progress beyond the state-of-the-art and innovation potential.
Q3 - Does the proposal advance the state-of-the-art andintroduce an innovative approach to the challenge?
Added value of networking
Q4 - Is networking the best approach to tackle the challenge?
Q5 - What is the added value of the proposed Network in relation to former and existing efforts at European and/or international level?
22
3.2. Eligibility criteria
IMPACT CRITERIAScientific, technological and/or socio-economic imp acts.
Q6 - Does the proposal clearly identify relevant, and realistic short-term/long-term impacts?
Measures to maximise impact.
Q7 - Does the proposal identify the most relevant stakeholders and present a clear plan to involve them as Action’s participants?
Q8 - Is there a clear and attainable plan for dissemination and/or exploitation of results?
Level of risk and level of potential innovation/bre akthroughs.
Q9 - How well does the proposal succeed in putting forwardpotential innovation/ breakthroughs with a convincing risk/returntrade-off?
23
3.2. Eligibility criteria
IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA Overall Coherence and effectiveness of the work pla n
Q10 - Is the work plan (WGs, tasks, activities, timeframe and deliverables) coherent, realistic and appropriate to ensure the achievement of the objectives?
Q11 - Does the proposal identify the main risks related to the work plan and has a plan for contingencies?
Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures
Q12 - Are the management structure and procedures appropriate?
Network as a whole
Q13 - Does the proposed Network envisage the critical mass,expertise and geographical distribution for addressing thechallenge and the objectives? If not, does the proposal identifythe gaps in the Network and present a clear plan forovercoming the gaps? Are mutual benefits clearly ascertainedin case of involvement of NNC and IPC institutions?
24
Website & Social Networks
http://www.cost-ca17126.industriales.upm.es /
@ca17126