CM , 01, commni x/h · Units 1 A2 u.s. m aan m e c as * CM , 01, commni || '%.x/h BEFORE THE ATOMIC...

8
-- __ _ _ _ , 00CKETED ' - USNRC n' j , - - - = ^ t::. .r: o . :nc:::::: ! ! l '81 NOV 23 All:32 -- W ,4 J SECRETARY - s . \ NJ f ZMiiflG & SERVICE IIS liUCLEAR U1:ATOR ISSION. BRANCH d ' ' ' ' In the matter of 2[ " Docket Nos. 50-229 CPCo. Midland Plant ei NOVE 71981>$ 50-330 Units 1 A2 u.s. m aan m e c as CM , 01, * commni || '%. x/h BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAF #4 SING BOARD 11/16/81 ~ INTERVENOR REOUEST FOR THE ADM1SSION OF THE TRUTH OF A MATTER OF FACT AS REPRESENTED BY CERTAIN DOCLNENTS OF CPCo. | . The enclosed documents, for which I recuest an admission er authenticity, appear to contradict the statement in the prepared testimony of Mr. Gilbert Keeley that "On January 26, 1979 applica- tion of the surcharge to the Diese l Generator Building was com;nence d." (1). They also contradict Mr. Howell's prepared testimony wh!.h States that the NRC Staff was informed of the preload choice "in early January, some 4 months before the preload was begun." (2) A 8 Figures 21a-2, and 21b-1 are a pcrtion of Consumers April - c. ,7 4 , 147c response to NRC 50-54f questien 21. The graph Figure M, Sr recording average surcharge in Ibs ./sc . f t . , as well as r i .p r e :4 y | 41 (F'evet ton of Preload as of Feb.2, 1979) 3; re ferenced in 55e Int erl= Report #4, and Figure 7 (DGB Average Pedestal Settlement VS Time) are attachy pts to Consumers 5Se Reports on the Diesel i Cenerator Building Settlement. (enclosures A-E) (1) p.10 Keeley testimony, following tr.1163 y68 (2) p. 23 HoweII testimony,. following tr. 2802 pp 8111300165 811116 PDR ADOCK 05000329 C PDR _ - - _ _ _ _ - _

Transcript of CM , 01, commni x/h · Units 1 A2 u.s. m aan m e c as * CM , 01, commni || '%.x/h BEFORE THE ATOMIC...

  • --__ _ _ _ ,

    00CKETED'-USNRCn' j, - - - =

    ^ t::. .r: o . :nc:::::: !! l '81 NOV 23 All:32--

    W,4 J SECRETARY

    - s . \ NJ f ZMiiflG & SERVICEIIS liUCLEAR U1:ATOR ISSION. BRANCH

    d' '

    ''

    In the matter of 2[ " Docket Nos. 50-229CPCo. Midland Plant ei NOVE 71981>$ 50-330Units 1 A2 u.s. m aan m e c as CM , 01,*commni ||

    '%.x/h

    BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAF #4 SING BOARD

    11/16/81

    ~ INTERVENOR REOUEST FOR THE ADM1SSION OF THE TRUTH OFA MATTER OF FACT AS REPRESENTED BY CERTAIN DOCLNENTS OF CPCo. |.

    The enclosed documents, for which I recuest an admission

    er authenticity, appear to contradict the statement in the preparedtestimony of Mr. Gilbert Keeley that "On January 26, 1979 applica-

    tion of the surcharge to the Diese l Generator Building was com;nence d."

    (1). They also contradict Mr. Howell's prepared testimony wh!.hStates that the NRC Staff was informed of the preload choice "in

    early January, some 4 months before the preload was begun." (2)A 8

    Figures 21a-2, and 21b-1 are a pcrtion of Consumers April- c.

    ,7 4 , 147c response to NRC 50-54f questien 21. The graph Figure M,

    Sr recording average surcharge in Ibs ./sc . f t . , as well as r i .p r e:4

    y| 41 (F'evet ton of Preload as of Feb.2, 1979) 3; re ferenced in 55e

    Int erl= Report #4, and Figure 7 (DGB Average Pedestal Settlement

    VS Time) are attachy pts to Consumers 5Se Reports on the DieseliCenerator Building Settlement. (enclosures A-E)

    (1) p.10 Keeley testimony, following tr.1163 y68(2) p. 23 HoweII testimony,. following tr. 2802 pp

    8111300165 811116PDR ADOCK 05000329C PDR

    . . . . - .

    _ - - _ _ _ _ - _

  • _ .

    <

    #%

    .

    In acknowledginD the authenticity of the above documents,

    I recuest that Consumers admit that the apn11 cation of the surcharDe

    was begun prior to January 26, 1979,and notwithstanding the factthat the first 2 or S feet have bat 1 considered " frost, protection"

    placed in November 1978, that the actual decision to proceed with

    the'preload took place December 15, 1978.

    .

    Respectfully Submitted,,

    J' ^, -

    o I regret that I did not find these documents earlier. I will

    await Consumers response in the hopes of being able to include this

    in my Proposed Findings. I also promise that this will be the last

    Admission that I will attempt to include in my Proposed Findings.

    Should I find any1other significant information I would consider

    it my burden to attempt to reopen this portion of the proceeding.I hope all parties agree that despite its difficulties, this isthe most expeditious way to deal with' this matter.

    cc: ASLB Members .Wm. Paton, NRCM. Miller, CPCo.Secretary,. NRC

    ,

    _ s

  • b .~ ' ' ',

    RELATED,,C0r. rC:"JGCE |1

    TABLE 21a-200f.KETED

    ESTIMATE SUMMARY

    ORIGINAL REMOVAL AND RE LACEMENT Pb hhObfM

    -- -- e cort 3 pv.

    D3CntliNG & SERVICEiiRANCH

    Manhours $1.000s

    Remove building 59,200 775

    Remove backfill 3,000 175

    Remove utilities 5,200 90

    Replace backfill 13,000 285 .

    Replace utilities '15,900 430

    Replace building 117,600 2,400 -

    Subtotal Direct Costs 213,900 4,lh3

    Distributab,le manual labor and 64,200 1,695materials

    ( Nonmanual labor 85,600 1,140-

    Engineering and home office 10,000 250

    Contingency 74,700 1,450

    Total Bechtel Costs 448,400 $8,700 0A

    Notes:

    1. Estimate based on building status as of December 15, 1978,A when decision was made to proceed with the preload plan.

    2. Excludes costs associated with any potential schedule delays.

    3. Corresponds with the schedule shown in Figuro 21b-2.

    \(

    ,~.,- , _ . - _ , _ _ _ - . . . . _ - . - - - _ _ . - - _

  • - - - - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    *OPTION 1- PRELOADING OF DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING S0ILS

    FIGURE 21.B.

    1978 ' 1979 . 1980DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUGI SEP OCT NOVI DEC JAN I FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NON

    UNIT NO.2 HOT STARDif 5E L GEhE h.tTO fi PUNCTICNAL FUELTU$NOVER "ESTING LOAC

    R R ATIONAL M rTING h LR.T 1. m LOAD PR P{ QCURRLNT STARTUP SC HE DUL E :2 MONTHPOT)NTIAL | NOT :COrjsT RUCTION THt TENTI AL CONSTR UCT 'O NDELAY I DEL Y HAS EEEN ASLUMED T3

    l INDICATE A!!MILAR POT NT ALRE VIEV' D AT A, APPROVI DELAY IN TOE UNIT | FUEL.

    DECISidN TO SURCHnRGE RE MOVALAND | LOAp. UN4T 1 FUEL LJADPROCEEiD RELEALE FOR COMPLET ON FR ,kP FOLt,0WS ANY DELA" BY ANi

    PR PAFATIONS SURCHARGE PLACEMEhT REMO'/E 6 4'FOl4 SURCH ARGE AND ANTICIPATED SURCHARGEiPLqCEMENT SURCHARGE PRELOADI 4G PERIOD ,c c o--o go

    12-1579 START | |(ACTUA l ,SEQUEbCEil | g ,2-1579 | qNSTL INSTL(ACTU A .)

    | EQUIP E EQUlP 4P664*-6" 634'-8" MECHnNICAL 1 .'! kPING lhSTALLATIONj

    I I

    | | SYSTEMj | WA LK DOWNg | & QONSTR dMPL

    UNIT ;' DIESEL GENERnTOR HVnC INST A L L ATIC4 / i) NIT 2 5 (STEMh- FURNOVERCON!1 RUCTION ACTIVITIES I% eII I

    I I

    I I

    (LECTRI:AL INS'r ALLATION

    .s 's

    I-

  • .

    ___ . _ _ _

    .

    -.

    9 I ! ! ! l'! l'! !f. I 1 ! ? +tm! ''! I l '~ l I t't t ! ! +rrrr; |- | | 1 | r . sam e~

    kiNERATOR BUILDING n0

    ,0.vE b or agrnr.g e.1

  • _.

    . .

    '

    .tI' I!!!!!j!!13i!!!!j!!!!! 0g -= ** tm!!!!PlGnpmmmimtmimmmm ,| SETTLEMt cT OF DIESEL

    -, _ . ,

    .o o, u , u .,

    ---.e.

    f= ----d, _ ._-- ___ _.'e ,w- ss- . . |.

    D.c-%< .-.

    '3, . ,!. .e,

    |!!' ,i. ,!.I

    ;---- _._ -m

    .

    - | |, |y ,,* '

    .'

    $, {!|

    --- .as,

    |

    .f | g.. .g .I . ...y .g, ,, ,.;. ;

    !i . ,,..g., o m ,j. ,.,. . .

    ,m

    I - 1- - . , -

    J-+,., | ;,

    e _m--- .v.i is __s----

    ,,

    awn_tm. i

    ,

    a yml , -e ,-I .l ij'! ' I ''. :,

    !lli .-4; ,i

    jt 8 .. , _,I ! |'

    il i,

    i' 4: !; !:k ' :l[ l-! i' i l' i. . ,.

    ,,I!! l'4M - i% 4

    .I

    ! |t i I'f || |I g .j . |t i ''

    lil,i!|l', !.;|I!i!' t

    3

    ,!' i i -x.'

    I= h g~., .-- '*- ||1 i !!Iljij:: !

    - u. c . |,, tt'r< . -. . '

    -j~'74m 'i!| i | i+. .c-- .- .----- _ _ _ ,

    B,.----.

    5- j; ..: . . . .,.. . .

    1 j3 ' . .~. ,; -I I+ g .n. .p -m .

  • ~ R4

    VEP

    14

    4 43 3 E6 6 R

    U.GI

    F

    43

    , N N sN s N N g g4 NN- 6r 'L\

    \\

    \ ) 9 \0 4 3\ ( ' 63

    6 \)\9 \7

    9\ \1

    \OKN N ss N g gN N NN,2Y

    I I ; , I

    \R \G A

    \ \3 U!1 RD B ) \L E \ ) 7'I F 3

    6 \U F \B A rL J \R P \ 4O S 3 \T D A 3 3\ 6A A 6 NsR O D %N s( sN ssN N N '

    E L A \'

    N E OE R L \ \C P E

    R NL P \E) 8 XS F \ 2 3E O ( 6

    D N \ XI

    O\ XIT

    I I l ; '' XAV A

    NME .\ N gN\N % N N N N N N^L )E N L "0( N

    -x\ 5'

    x 3- 0 \ 6

    )1 7 x3 ( 3 .6

    \ 6 \ L.__ E

    N \ SA \ I

    s g s N * '\Ni . N N \N\N ENg 4 D3 A6 R

    G

    TNAL

    8 P36 8 L

    3 A-

    6 N-IF(

    %

    .

    .

    _ -

    ..

    !

  • _

    e -

    h,

    1978 1979

    JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG0* 'g ........ . . . . . . .

    1 ,... 8 - ._.

    % -

    g.%,-.x,,,,,,' ...... ... 2.s , _'

    .

    _e m 2 m- w.- ~ _ . .--gy - ' . N.. -ss.1 x.m o .s , - . - ,.- . . . .>z 3 -

    1 <N

    -

    ,

    ;"d DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING

    @ AVERAGE PEDESTAL SETTLEMENT VS TIME.3 1 2 3 4-_

    DbEL GENERATOR BUILDING..

    .