Closing remarks Ian Jackson OneGeology and British Geological Survey November 2010.
-
Upload
dinah-whitehead -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Closing remarks Ian Jackson OneGeology and British Geological Survey November 2010.
Closing remarks
Ian JacksonOneGeology
andBritish Geological Survey
November 2010
Why has OneGeology worked?• Short simple mission and vision, and 3 simple goals• Uncomplicated initial proposition, more sophisticated
functionality and data later• Inclusivity• Minimal intrusion into local systems• Pragmatic approach to coordination and governance• A “let’s do it, not excessively strategise about it and discuss it”
ethos• Motivated network• Outreach and media a priority
The lessons learned?• show the benefit of a vehicle to apply the data simply
and graphically as well as develop them• the power of a white space on a map is huge incentive to
join• Outreach and professional communication pays – be
bold and imaginative about it (and don’t leave it to scientists & technicians!)
• Branding IS important!• SDI strategies are opaque to wider stakeholders and
those who have to implement them outside• So don’t overdo the technical theory and strategising -
take a practical approach …. do, learn, build V2
• Rich diversity, extensive, expert, committed
• Great progress on a wide front in last few years
• …..but these assets are also a two-edged sword
• ….and present 10 challenges
GEO – some impressions from this workshop
1. Managing expectations - is GEO being too ambitious for what is a militia, not an army – is it advancing on too wide a front?
2. Is GEO/GEOSS data access ignoring an elephant in the room – researchers reluctance to release data?
3. Does GEO need a more mature and up-to-date approach to public release of data – one consistent with public interest and the internet paradigm?
4. SBA are much talked about, but could GEO do more to relate to society and less self-serving research?
5. Is there enough resource and priority given to PR and media profile?
6. Does GEO have the clear, efficient structure and governance to achieve its aspirations – does it need to prune and reduce the complexity?
7. Is GEO current engagement policy with the commercial sector an opportunity lost?
8. No explicit know-how exchange aim and yet GEO is doing it - should there be?
9. Much of the work is project based – is enough priority given to sustainability of the knowledge and systems?
10.Great progress which “changed the game” – but what is the next GEO game changer?