Clinical benefit of a disodium EDTA- based chelation therapy and high-dose oral multivitamins and...
-
Upload
marylou-welch -
Category
Documents
-
view
230 -
download
0
Transcript of Clinical benefit of a disodium EDTA- based chelation therapy and high-dose oral multivitamins and...
Clinical benefit of a disodium EDTA-based chelation therapy
and high-dose oral multivitamins and multiminerals in TACT- comparison of factorial
groups
Gervasio Lamas MD, FAHAColumbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach FL
Professor of MedicineColumbia University Medical Center
The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (U01AT001156) and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
(U01HL092607) provided sole support for this study.
Background Disodium ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
(EDTA) binds metal cations and permits renal excretion
Since 1956, EDTA chelation has been used to treat atherosclerotic disease
In 2001, NCCAM and NHLBI released an RFA for a definitive trial of EDTA chelation
The Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy was a 2 x 2 factorial trial that randomized patients to IV EDTA chelation or placebo, and high-dose oral vitamins and minerals or placebo
Background Comparison of EDTA chelation vs placebo
showed a 18% reduction in the combined primary cardiovascular endpoint: HR 0.82; 95%CI (0.69,0.99), p=0.035)*
Comparison of oral high-dose vitamins and minerals vs placebo showed an 11% reduction in the combined primary cardiovascular endpoint: HR 0.89 95% CI (0.75,1.07), p=0.212)**
* Lamas GA, Goertz C, Boineau R , et. al. JAMA. 2013;309(12):1241-1250** Lamas G, Boineau R, Goertz C, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(12): in Press.
The purpose of the present analyses is to examine outcomes in all four factorial groups, with emphasis on the double active arm vs the double placebo arm
Examine the factorial cells in patients with diabetes
Purpose
Design Overview - Factorial Trial
40 infusions, double blind active or placebo
6 vitamin caplets daily – double blind active or placebo
Lamas GA, Goertz C, Boineau R, et. al. Am Heart J. 2012;163(1):7-12
IV Chelation + ORAL high-dose vitamins
IV Placebo chelation + ORAL high-dose vitamins
IV Chelation +ORAL placebo vitamins
IV Placebo chelation + ORAL placebo vitamins
disodium EDTA, 3 grams, adjusted downward based on eGFR
ascorbic acid, 7 grams
magnesium chloride, 2 grams
potassium chloride, 2 mEq
sodium bicarbonate, 840 mg
pantothenic acid, thiamine, pyridoxine
procaine, 100 mg
unfractionated heparin, 2500 U
sterile water to 500 mLPLACEBO INFUSION
normal saline, 1.2% dextrose, 500 mL
Chelation Components
TACT: High-Dose Oral Treatment
3 caplets twice a day for the duration of the study
Lamas GA, Goertz C, Boineau R, et. al. Am Heart J. 2012;163(1):7-12
MagnesiumZinc
SeleniumCopper
Manganese Chromium
MolybdenumPotassium
CholineInositolPABABoron
VanadiumCitrus Flavonoids
Vitamin AVitamin CVitamin D3
Vitamin EVitamin KThiaminNiacin
VitaminB6
FolateVitamin B12
BiotinPanthothenic Acid
Calcium Iodine
Eligibility Age 50 or older
MI > 6 months prior
Creatinine <2.0 mg/dL
No coronary or carotid revascularization within 6 months
No active heart failure or heart failure hospitalization within 6 months
Able to tolerate 500cc infusions weekly
No cigarette smoking within 3 months
Signed informed consent
Endpoints & Power
Primary composite endpoint: death, MI, stroke, coronary revascularization, hospitalization for angina
Study designed with 85% power for detecting a 25% difference
Secondary endpoint: CV death, MI, stroke
Individual components of the primary and secondary endpoints
Data Analysis
Treatment comparisons as randomized (intent to treat)
Two-sided statistical testing
Log-rank test using time to first event
The present analyses focus on the 2 active arm vs the 2 placebo arm. Groups receiving only 1 intervention are shown for comparison purposes
Baseline CharacteristicsEDTA
Chelation and High-Dose Vitamins (N=421)
Placebo Infusions and
Placebo Vitamins (N=437)
P-value
Age (years) 64.9 (58.8, 71.4) 65.5 (59.2, 71.9) 0.386
BMI (kg/m2) 29.2 (26.5, 33.4) 29.9 (27.0, 33.8) 0.057
Female 17% 16% 0.809
Hispanic or non-Caucasian 8% 9% 0.574
Diabetes 38% 34% 0.207
Prior revascularization 83% 84% 0.879
Statin 74% 72% 0.558
Beta-blocker 70% 70% 0.892
Aspirin 87% 79% 0.003
Aspirin, warfarin or clopidogrel 93% 89% 0.110
LDL (mg/dL) 88.0 (66.5, 113.5)
93.0 (71.0, 122.0)
0.028
Treatment AdherencePatient Status EDTA
Chelation and High-Dose Vitamins (N=421)
Placebo Infusions and
Placebo Vitamins (N=437)
P-value
Number of infusions 40 (32, 40) 40 (30, 40) 0.554
Discontinued infusions 27% 31% 0.218
Completed 30 infusions 77% 75% 0.565
Completed 40 infusions 67% 65% 0.535
Discontinued vitamins 44% 47% 0.383
Continued vitamins for at least 1 year
78% 74% 0.224
Continued vitamins for at least 3 years
50% 48% 0.593
Consent withdrawal 12% 19% 0.004
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Placebo Infusions/Placebo VitaminsPlacebo Infusions/High-Dose Vi-taminsEDTA Chelation/Placebo VitaminsEDTA Chelation/High-Dose Vitamins
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
eTACT Primary Endpoint:
Factorial GroupsEDTA Chelation/High-dose
Vitamins vs. Placebo/Placebo
HR (95% CI): 0.74 (0.57, 0.95)
P = 0.016 8.3%
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
eTACT Secondary
Composite Endpoint
EDTA Chelation/High-dose Vitamins vs. Placebo
HR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.44, 0.99); P = 0.046
Placebo Infusions / Placebo Vitamins
EDTA Chelation / High-Dose Vitamins
EndpointsEDTA
Chelation and High-
Dose Vitamins (N=421)
Placebo Infusions
and Placebo Vitamins (N=437)
Hazard Ratio (95%
CI)
P-value
Primary Endpoint 26% 32% 0.74 (0.57, 0.95)
0.016
CVD, MI or stroke 9% 13% 0.66 (0.44, 0.99)
0.046
Death 10% 11% 0.87 (0.57, 1.30)
0.481
Cardiovascular death (CVD) 5% 6% 0.75 (0.41, 1.37)
0.383
MI 5% 7% 0.71 (0.42, 1.21)
0.230
Stroke 1% 2% 0.44 (0.13, 1.42)
0.135
Coronary revascularization 14% 19% 0.67 (0.48, 0.94)
0.019
Hospitalization for angina 1% 3% 0.49 (0.18, 1.31)
0.119
Analysis of Patients with Diabetes
Yesterday we presented and published that TACT patients with pre-specified diabetes have a significant reduction of the primary endpoint with EDTA chelation (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44-0.79, p<0.001)*
We analyzed whether the modest additive effect of oral vitamins was also evident in this population
* Escolar E, Lamas GA Mark DB, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
eTACT Primary Endpoint in
Diabetes Subgroup
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
e
Placebo Infusions / Placebo Vitamins
TACT Primary Endpoint in Diabetes Subgroup
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
e
Placebo Infusions / High-Dose Vitamins
Placebo Infusions / Placebo Vitamins
TACT Primary Endpoint in Diabetes Subgroup
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
e
Placebo Infusions / Placebo Vitamins
Placebo Infusions / High-Dose Vitamins
EDTA Chelation / Placebo Vitamins
TACT Primary Endpoint in Diabetes Subgroup
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
e
Placebo Infusions / Placebo Vitamins
Placebo Infusions / High-Dose Vitamins
EDTA Chelation / Placebo Vitamins
EDTA Chelation / High-Dose Vitamins
TACT Primary Endpoint in Diabetes Subgroup
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 600
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Months since randomization
Eve
nt
Rat
e
Placebo Infusions / Placebo Vitamins
EDTA Chelation / High-Dose Vitamins
EDTA Chelation/High-dose Vitamins vs. Placebo
HR (95% CI): 0.49 (0.33, 0.75)
P < 0.001
TACT Primary Endpoint in Diabetes Subgroup
Study Limitations
The TACT regimen is difficult, with 40 IV infusions and 6 large caplets daily, leading to non-adherence for some patients
A larger than expected number of patients withdrew consent
Overall, vitamin therapy produced a non-significant 11% reduction in events. However, this modest reduction was additive to the 18% reduction observed with chelation, leading to a 26% reduction with active + active compared with placebo + placebo
Conclusions
Analysis of the 2 active arm vs the 2 placebo arm in TACT suggests greater benefit when chelation is accompanied by high-dose oral vitamins
This benefit of chelation + vitamins compared to placebo + placebo is statistically significant and of a magnitude sufficient to be clinically important, with a number needed to treat of 12 to prevent 1 primary event over 5 years.
The benefit of vitamin therapy added to EDTA chelation is magnified in the subgroup of patients with diabetes, with a number needed to treat of 5.5 to prevent 1 primary event over 5 years