Climate-smart agriculture: panacea or propaganda?
-
Upload
center-for-international-forestry-research-cifor -
Category
Environment
-
view
708 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Climate-smart agriculture: panacea or propaganda?
Agroforestry
Climate-smart agriculture: panacea or
propaganda?
Nutrition security
Poverty alleviation
Natural resource
management
Improved
cook-stove
Conservation
agriculture
Increased yields
Soil quality & carbon
Reduced
degradation &
erosion
Dietary
diversity
Intercropping
Participatory
approach
Todd Rosenstock & Christine LamannaGlobal Landscapes Forum
Lima, Peru | 7 Dec. 2014
Global Alliance for CSA: 500 million
smallholders
NEPAD Vision 25x25: 25 million in Africa by
2025
Photo:CCAFS
Meta-analysis: 65 practices/15 indicators
Key word search
Abstract title
review
Full text review
Data
extraction/analys
is
144,567
papers
16,254
papers
6,100
papers
~120,000 data points
Studies with indicators for at least one
component of CSA
Random sample of 815 studies
Studies with indicators for at least two
components of CSA
Random sample of 815 studies
Studies with indicators for all three
components of CSA
Random sample of 815 studies
●
●
●
●●●
Alternative feeds
Increasing protein
Diet management
Inorganic fertilizer
Leguminous AF
Agroforestry (AF)
−0.5 0.0 0.5Effect size
CS
AEffects of CSA on food security are
variable and can be + or -
Random sample of 130 studies
-60% 0 +60%
Mean effect from random sample of 130 studies (55 comparisons)
Synergies and tradeoffs between
food security and adaptation with CSA
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-0.5 -0.3 -0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5
Food securityA
dap
tati
on
6% 16%
46% 32%SynergiesTradeoffs
Tradeoffs
Financial support
CCAFSIFAD
CIFOR-EBF
FAO-MICCA
Collaborators:
K Tully, C. Corner-Dolloff, E
Girvetz, M Lazaro, A Jarvis,
P Bell, S Chesterman, S
MacFatrige, H Strom, A
Madalinska, A-S Eyrich, C
Champalle, W English, A
Akinleye, A Poultouchidou,
A Kerr, H Neufeldt
Thank [email protected]