CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLAN FOR THE ......2016/06/21 · climate change effects. Vulnerability...

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FEBRUARY 2016

PREPARED BYPREPARED FOR

This research was funded by the District of Columbia Sustainable DC Innovation Fund (DOEE ID 2013-9-OPS)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY amp ENVIRONMENTTommy Wells DirectorMaribeth DiLorenzo Deputy Director Urban Sustainability AdministrationKate Johnson Climate Program Analyst Phetmano Phannavong Environmental Engineer

Produced in collaboration withPERKINS+WILLAmy Thompson Project ManagerJanice Barnes PrincipalDouglas Pierce PrincipalJon Penndorf Sustainability Leader

KLEINFELDERLisa Dickson Principal in ChargeNathalie Beauvais Project ManagerIndrani Ghosh Lead ModelerNasser Brahim Vulnerability AssessmentKarin Hagan GIS Lead

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

FEBRUARY 2016



PHOTO CREDIT KEVIN WOLF SUSTAINABLE DC CLIMATE CHANGE PHOTO CONTEST

5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW 13

01 METHODOLOGY 17

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 18

EXPOSURE TO FLOODING 19

EXPOSURE TO HEAT 24

RISK ASSESSMENT 25

02 INFRASTRUCTURE VULNERABILITY amp RISK ASSESSMENT 27

ENERGY 32

TRANSPORTATION 33

TRANSIT 35

WATER 37

TELECOMMUNICATIONS 41

03 COMMUNITY RESOURCES VULNERABILITY amp RISK ASSESSMENT 43

MUNICIPAL RESOURCES 48

SERVICES amp PUBLIC SAFETY 48

MEDICAL SERVICES 49

HUMAN SERVICES 49

SCHOOLS 50

PUBLIC amp SENIOR HOUSING SHELTERS 50

04 VULNERABLE POPULATIONS 53

05 NEXT STEPS 57

REFERENCES 62

ATTACHMENTS 1 SOCIAL VULNERABILITY AND RANKING PROTOCOL

2 MAPS (Electric format high resolution)

CONTENTS

VULNERABILITY amp RISK ASSESSMENT6

7

FIGURESFIGURE 1 SCORING CRITERIA

FIGURE 2 COMPILATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE MOST AT RISK

FIGURE 3 COMPILATION OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES MOST AT RISK

FIGURE 4 SENSITIVITY AND ADAPTIVE CAPACITY INDICATORS

MAPSMAP 1 PLANNING PRIORITY AREAS

MAP 2 2020 SCENARIO FOR FLOODING AREAS



MAP 5 COMPILATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE MOST AT RISK

MAP 6 WATER QUALITY WITH FLOODING SCENARIOS 2020 2050 AND 2080

MAP 7 COMPILATION OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES MOST AT RISK

MAP 8 VULNERABLE POPULATIONS PER WARD

LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES


Climate change is redefining risk both locally and globally Past events are no longer reasonable proxies for current or future conditions The District of Columbia has taken a proactive stance on climate change and is committed to identifying prioritizing and addressing climate risks Sustainable DC the Districtrsquos comprehensive sustainability plan adopted in 2013 called on the District to ldquoadvance physical adaption and human preparedness to increase the Districtrsquos resilience to future climate changerdquo In order to achieve that goal the Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE) launched an effort to develop a citywide climate adaptation and resilience plan for the District This report is the second step of that multi-phase project The first phase assessed how climate change is likely to affect the District This report assesses the vulnerabilities and risks that the District faces due to those climate change effects

Vulnerability to climate change is expressed as a function of exposure sensitivity and adaptive capacity The risk assessment analyzes the most vulnerable assets identified in the vulnerability assessment and ranks them based on probability of occurrence and consequence of impact

The vulnerability and risk assessment summarized here is based on climate change projections and scenarios established in the first phase of the project and are summarized in the previously released Climate Projections and Scenario Development Report Those scenarios include rising temperatures and more frequent and severe heat waves increased frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation events rising sea levels and

increased coastal flooding due to storm surge The scenarios were used to conduct a ldquostress testrdquo on the Districtrsquos infrastructure and resources Based on the climate scenarios developed in the previous report the project team used GIS mapping and conversations with District government agencies and stakeholders to evaluate the vulnerability of District infrastructure public facilities and populations The findings in this report represent a first order prioritization of at-risk assets and neighborhoods that will inform the final climate adaptation plan as well as related planning efforts The final climate adaptation plan will provide an integrated analysis of existing climate change data an assessment of vulnerable assets and recommend strategies to help the District reduce risk and adapt to a changing climate

Key FindingsThe key findings from the Vulnerability and Risk Assessment are as follows

bull Wards 7 and 8 are home to the largest number of residents with a higher vulnerability to climate change impacts ndash especially an increase in extreme heat ndash due to the socioeconomic factors that increase sensitivity to heat and limit the ability to adapt including unemployment age (seniors and young children) and income

bull Ward 7 is also home to the largest number of vulnerable community resources such as schools medical services and human services particularly in the floodplain of the Watts Branch tributary

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

9

bull Other community resources at risk of flooding including police fire and local and federal emergency operations centers are concentrated in Downtown DC (around Federal Triangle area) and Southwest DC (south of the Capitol to Buzzard Point) If flooding were to occur in these areas it could impact multiple facilities that serve critical public safety functions when they would be needed most Such scenarios could likely occur due to flooding from sea level rise storm surge and extreme precipitation as a result of climate change

bull Major infrastructure assets such as electric substations and Metrorail (operated by the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority or WMATA) are at-risk to increased heat and flooding by 2020 or 2050 their failure could have significant regional impact as District businesses governments and residents rely on energy supply and public transportation for day-to-day life Two of the three electric substations identified as at-risk in this report are within or are abutting the 100 year-floodplain and are currently at risk of being flooded They are all located in the 500-year floodplain which may be a more appropriate indicator of future flood risk given projected sea level rise and increased frequency of extreme precipitation events

bull Surface flooding from inland precipitation events may pose as much risk as flooding associated with sea level rise and storm

surge ndash especially in the near term

bull Areas of risk to flooding and extreme heat are not evenly distributed throughout the District but instead are concentrated near particular water bodies (eg the Watts Branch tributary to the Anacostia River) or areas with a large number of highly vulnerable residents that will not only be more at risk of exposure to climate impacts but are also less likely to have the means to adapt or be resilient to flooding or heat stress

bull Under existing conditions the District is already vulnerable to flooding along the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers as documented by repetitive historic flooding events and the Federal Emergency Management Agencyrsquos (FEMA) map of the 100-year floodplain The combined impact of increased precipitation sea level rise and storm surge will require reconsidering the delineation of the current 100-year and 500-year floodplain boundaries to reflect increased flooding risks in the future

bull Taking into account the Districtrsquos unique geography as it is bounded by the Potomac River and is bisected by the Anacostia Riverbridges provide vital connections within the District and to surrounding areas Their possible failure due to flooding impacts would have significant implications on the functioning of the larger regional transportation network Key bridges have been potentially identified as at risk in


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

this assessment such as the 14th Street Bridges1 that span the Potomac River It is recommended that a more detailed vulnerability assessment be performed for key bridges spanning the Potomac and Anacostia rivers

Since many of these risks to regional assets are not limited to the Districtrsquos jurisdiction adaptation will require coordination with other states agencies and organizations such as regional transportation agencies and energy providers

Priority Adaption Planning AreasPlanning priority areas have been identified as areas regrouping a concentration of assets most at risk and located in areas also showing highly vulnerable populations

Map 1 the Priority Planning Areas Map shows the five (5) identified areas with the most at-risk infrastructure community resources and populations with respect to climate change within the boundaries of the District It represents the results of an assessment and ranking of the comparative risk to infrastructure public facilities and community resources based on the likelihood of exposure to climate change impacts and the consequences of a failure or disruption The scoring system used also considered the cascading impact of one system failing and interdependencies of the infrastructure

systems and critical resources For example flooding could impact lifeline systems such as energy and telecommunications without which some roadway infrastructure (eg traffic signals lighting) may not be able to properly function The adaptation plan will provide recommendations to reduce risks to the Priority Planning Areas as well as the District as whole Areas are identified as planning priority areas as they have a higher risk of vulnerability by failure of many systems and would impact populations that are likely to be most impacted by climate change impacts As informed by the vulnerability and risk assessment key findings adaption planning should focus on these locations

PRIORITY PLANNING AREA 1

Includes the neighborhoods of Bloomingdale and LeDroit Park Because this area has already experienced significant flooding due to the limited capacity of the existing stormwater management systems the projected increase in frequency and severity of extreme precipitation elevates these neighborhoods to a high-risk level Ongoing efforts to expand the capacity of the stormwater system capacity in the area including DC Waterrsquos Northeast Boundary Tunnel and interim McMillan Stormwater Storage Project will significantly reduce this risk but not for the most extreme events

1 The 14th Street Bridges refers to the group of three highway bridges (Rochambeau George Mason Memorial Arlan Williams Memorial) a railroad bridge (Long) and a Metrorail Bridge (Fenwick Metro Transit) that span the Potomac

11


This area around the Watts Branch a tributary to the Anacostia River is currently at risk of flooding and is projected to be at increased risk as early as 2020 This area has a significant concentration of community resources at-risk such as medical services and public housing including the soon-to-redeveloped Kenilworth Courts project that serve vulnerable populations


This area includes the Districtrsquos downtown area centered around the Federal Triangle neighborhood These areas are already at risk of riverine coastal and interior flooding which will be exacerbated by 2080 These areas have a significant concentration of built infrastructure including a large concentration of professional businesses cultural resources including the Smithsonian and National Mall as well as Metrorail stations and other community resources such as the John A Wilson Building (city hall) and other DC agency headquarters This arearsquos roadway and transit systems also serve a large number of the Districtrsquos transient population of commuters and tourists Actions are already being taken to better protect this area from riverine flooding including upgrades to the 17th Street Levee and the greater Potomac levee system It will however remain at risk to interior flooding and by 2080 there will be an increased risk from riverine and coastal flooding due to rising sea level


This area in Southwest DC extends from south of the Capitol to Buzzards Point and is primarily at risk of riverine and coastal flooding This area is a mix of residential commercial government and several large development projects and planning initiatives (The Wharf Buzzard Point DC United Soccer Stadium etc) The area includes a variety of community resource facilities and infrastructure at risk of flooding including public safety public housing human services transit energy and wastewater Several public housing properties are located in Priority Area 4 including the Greenleaf properties that are scheduled to be redeveloped in the near future and James Creek Metrorail lines that cross through this area include the Green Line and BlueOrangeSilver Line


This area along the Potomac River is at risk of flooding within 2020 2050 and 2080 scenarios which will impact a key electrical sub-station and the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant A planned sea wall at Blue Plains which is being designed to the current 500-year flood elevation plus three feet to account for sea level rise will substantially reduce the risk to the plant but not necessarily the surrounding areas


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MAP 1 Planning Priority Areas (Source Kleinfelder February 2016)

PRIORITY PLANNING AREAS MAP

13

In order to assess the impacts of climate change on the District of Columbia we inventoried key infrastructure and community resources and ranked them based on their vulnerability to climate change and the risk associated with their failure Assets are determined to be critical or key based on their contribution to the overall functionality of the District as a whole and the consequences if they were to fail

Examples of critical infrastructure include electrical substations and roadways Key community resources include facilities that support the well-being of the community such as affordable housing and human services The listing below represents the critical infrastructure and key community resources that were included in this analysis A detailed discussion of each follows

BUILT INFRASTRUCTURES2

Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing

In addition to threats to the built environment we considered the vulnerability of the Districtrsquos residents recognizing that some residents will be less able to adapt to the risks of climate change Social aspects of vulnerability to climate change impacts are more challenging to measure than those in the built environment as they are defined by a complex set of demographic economic and health factors In order to identify the wards with the largest share of vulnerable residents a vulnerable population index3 was developed using demographic and socioeconomic indicators of both sensitivity to climate change impacts and ability adapt Indicators include the following

OVERVIEW

2 There are some infrastructure types and community resources that were not included in this study due to a lack of publicly available geospatial data for the resource3 Refer to the Attachment titled ldquoSocial Vulnerability and Ranking Protocolrdquo for a complete report on the methodology for determining the vulnerable population index


bull Income poverty is associated with poor nutrition and less access to medical care Low-income individuals also have fewer financial resources to cope with and recover from disasters and disruptions such as damage to housing disruption to work schedules

bull Age seniors and young children are more sensitive to extreme heat Seniors may also be less able to cope with flooding and other disasters due to poor health disabilities or other functional needs or limited financial resources

The data used for the index were derived from demographic and place-based indicators as reported in the Sustainable DC Plan (2013) This vulnerability assessment also considers populations within DC such as the tourist population commuters or outdoor workers which are also likely to be impacted by climate change related events such as flooding and heat waves

The team did not explicitly assess the vulnerability of natural systems because those analyses are covered by other studies that have recently been completed or are underway For example in the 2015 Wildlife Action Plan DOEE assessed the vulnerability of the Districtrsquos wildlife and habitat to climate change and identified priority habitat restoration and protection actions Furthermore nature-based strategies to

address climate change impacts such as expanding the current tree canopy use of green infrastructure to reduce stormwater runoff and the use of wetlands to mitigate flooding will also be addressed in the forthcoming Climate Change Adaptation Plan Report

Finally many of the Districtrsquos infrastructure and natural systems extend beyond the cityrsquos boundaries or are outside of its direct jurisdiction so the impacts of climate change on the District at-large are codependent upon regional conditions and actions

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15

PHOTO CREDIT VICTORIA PICKERING SUSTAINABLE DC CLIMATE CHANGE PHOTO CONTEST


01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY

Vulnerability to climate change is expressed as a function of exposure sensitivity and adaptive capacity

Exposure refers to the extent to which a system comes into contact with a specific climate change impact The types and extent of exposure have been determined as part of the Climate Projections and Scenario Development Report which established the basis for conducting the vulnerability and risk assessment For example exposure for a specific asset such as an electric substation is determined by its location within an area prone to flooding as identified in the 2020 2050 and 2080 scenarios

Sensitivity is the degree to which the functionality of a system is affected by a specific climate change impact whether directly or indirectly For example a roadway might be less sensitive to flooding than an electric substation

Adaptive capacity is the ability or potential of a system to respond successfully to climate change and includes adjustments both in behavior and in resources and technologies For example two emergency facilities in close proximity one of which is located in a less flood-prone area would allow for redundancy in service and provide for adaptive capacity Cost and feasibility are often key factors in determining the adaptive capacity of a system

For the purpose of this study exposure is used as a proxy for vulnerability for critical infrastructures community resources and populations However the sensitivity of an asset in terms of its overall functionality was factored into the scoring and ranking of assets as described in the risk assessment methodology section below

The vulnerability and risk assessment was performed using existing or as-is conditions for assets resources and population Subsequent damages or upgrades to assets changes in urban development and in the demographics of each ward in the city will yield a different ranking for vulnerability and risk This assessment has been designed to be revised over time to update the ranking of elements most at risk

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

19

EXPOSURE TO FLOODING

The scenarios used to determine the extent of exposure to climate change impacts are based on data summarized in the previous Climate Projections and Scenario Development Report The flood exposure maps (Map 2 3 and 4) illustrate projected impacts for flooding in each of the climate projection scenarios The flooding maps are used as the basis to assess exposure of the Districtrsquos critical infrastructure and community resources to flooding and provide a GIS tool to identify areas and assets with increasing risks

For sea level rise and storm surge the following scenarios were used

bull 2020 The present 100-year base flood elevation as determined by FEMA is used as a proxy for future coastal storm surge and riverine flooding in 2020 The base flood elevation is the computed elevation to which floodwater is anticipated to rise during the base flood which in the case of the 100-year flood is an event having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year In order to account for interior drainage flooding which is not considered to be part of the floodplain outlined by FEMA this scenario also considered historic neighborhood flooding as reported by stakeholders including those areas within 500 feet of a high-risk storm drain4 and with properties that have suffered repetitive losses as reported by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

bull 2050 The storm surge extent maps for a Category 2 hurricane created by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for the 2015 North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS) The Category 2 hurricane map serves as a proxy for the current FEMA 100-year base flood elevation + three feet since these two layers are approximately comparable in extent The three additional feet accounts for a conservative estimate of projected sea level rise by 2050 as well as based on general scientific consensus that sea level rise is projected to be higher than two feet by mid-century

bull 2080 The current FEMA 500-year base flood elevation This is approximately equal to the current 100-year flood + four feet The four additional feet accounts for the projected amount of sea level rise (up to 34 feet from 2014 according to the USACE) by 2080

4 High-risk storm drain according to 2010 DC Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan


01 METHODOLOGY

For precipitation the following design storms5 were used

2020

bull Higher scenario 105 inches for the 100-year 24-hour storm

bull Lower scenario 46 inches for the 15-year 6-hour storm

20506



2080

bull Higher scenario 14 inches for the 100-year mdash 24 hour storm

bull Lower scenario 5 inches for the 15-year mdash 6 hour storm

While these calculations indicate the depth of rain expected in future storms they do not provide the extent or depth of flooding that could be associated with each This requires

additional modeling that was beyond the scope of this project As a proxy areas within the FEMA floodplain and areas of known flooding risk (refer to maps 2 3 and 4) have been identified as at-risk areas for increased precipitation in the future The precipitation scenarios have been considered qualitatively for the purpose of this assessment The results shown here should be treated as a first-order approximation to identify priority risk areas until additional modeling is completed

5 Design storms are the precipitation (rain) events that engineers use to design drainage infrastructure bridges culverts etc6 According to climate change projections completed for theClimat eprojections and Scenario Development Report there were no significant changes in the design storm depths (in inches) between the 2020s and 2050s Hence the precipitation scenarios are similar between these two planning horizons

21

MAP 2 2020 Scenario for flooding areas of known flood risk and the current FEMA 100-year floodplain (Source FEMA and NACCS maps and historic flooding as identified by stakeholders overlaid on GIS map base Kleinfelder 2015)

Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River

Copyright copy2014 Esri DeLorme HERE

LEGEND

Known Flood Risk2020 ScenarioWater BodyWard BoundaryDistrict of Columbia Boundary

2020 SCENARIO FOR FLOODING


Known Flood Risk2020 Scenario

Water BodyWater Boundary

District of Columbia Boundary

Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY

MAP 3 2050 Scenario based on NACCS SLOSH hurricane storm surge inundation mapping for present day Category 2 hurricane as a proxy for the current FEMA 100-year base flood elevation + 3 feet of sea level rise (Source NACCS map and historic flooding as identified by stakeholders overlaid on GIS map base Kleinfelder 2015)

Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND

Known Flood Risk2050 ScenarioWater Body

Ward BoundaryDistrict of Columbia Boundary



Known Flood Risk2050 ScenarioWater BodyWater BoundaryDistrict of Columbia Boundary

Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23

MAP 4 2080 Scenario based on current FEMA 500-year floodplain as a proxy for the current FEMA 100-year base flood elevation + 4 feet of sea level rise (Source NACCS map and historic flooding as identified by stakeholders overlaid on GIS map base Kleinfelder 2015)

Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY

Heat waves are defined as an extended period of very high temperatures For this study a heat wave was defined as three or more days with a temperature in excess of 95degF The extended period of heat has significant implications for public health as human physiology is sensitive to long periods of sustained heat exposure resulting in an increase in heat-related illnesses and deaths The elderly and very young and those with chronic health conditions such as obesity and diabetes are at greater risk for heat-related illness or death (Basu and Samet 2002) during extreme or prolonged heat waves as well those with respiratory or circulatory diseases (Anderson and Bell 2009)

As documented in the previously published Climate Projections and Scenario Development Report temperatures are projected to continue to increase in the District Currently summer daytime maximum temperatures average 87degF and nighttime minimum temperatures average 66degF In the projected temperature scenarios summer daytime maximums the duration of heat waves and the number of dangerously hot days are all expected to increase The selected scenarios are

bull 2020 Increase of daytime maximum by 25 - 3degF and a possible heat wave of 6 days with a daily maximum heat index value above 95 degF

bull 2050 Increase of daytime maximum by 5 - 7degF and a possible heat wave of 8 - 95 days with a daily maximum heat index value above 95 degF


In the absence of heat island maps that show the spatial variability of localized urban heat island impacts this assessment of heat-related vulnerability has been performed for the District as a whole A ldquostress testrdquo was conducted for increased heat for 2050 and 2080 with the assumption that the year 2020 was too close to the present day to reflect a significant change It was assumed by the research team that the Districtrsquos critical infrastructure and community resources are designed to adequately meet current high temperatures but might begin to fail under more frequent extreme heat by 2050 It should be noted however that some infrastructure assets such as the Metrorail and regional rail lines already must reduce service and train speeds during extreme heat events due to concerns about heat-related damage to tracks (VRE 2015)

EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25

The risk assessment analyzes the most vulnerable assets identified in the vulnerability assessment and ranks them based on probability of occurrence and consequence of impact It assigns a value to the probability of an event occurring and to the relative impact if it were to occur For example a Capital Bikeshare station located near a waterbody may have significant vulnerability to flooding There may also be a high probability that the flooding would occur However the overall impact such as increased commuting time for bicyclists or decreased recreational biking opportunities would be less significant to the District as a whole compared to the flooding of an electrical substation which may leave residents businesses and public services without power Given the same probability of flooding the electrical substation is identified as a high-risk asset while the Capital Bikeshare station is not The areas with the most assetssystems at high-risk are identified as the priority planning areas and will be a focus for subsequent adaptation planning

As illustrated in Figure 1 each asset was ranked according to a qualitative assessment based on the extent of area of service loss the estimated duration of service loss the cost of damage and impacts to public safety services economic activities public health the environment and to vulnerable populations Scores were assigned for each criteria as 1 (least severe) to 3 (most severe) Area of service loss is scored based on extent of the geographic area that would be impacted during a disruption ranging from a neighborhood parts of a ward to one two or more wards as the most severe Duration of service loss is scored based on assumptions of the length of time needed to repair or relocate services Cost of damage is based on preliminary estimates ranging from less than $100000 to more than $1 million as most severe Impact to public safety public health and the environment is based on a qualitative assessment by District agencies of the types of services that would be impacted The impact to vulnerable populations is informed by the areas impacted and the locations with the largest vulnerable populations as documented in Section 4 of this report

RISK ASSESSMENT

Score Area of Service Loss

Duration of Service Loss

Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services

Impacts to Economic Activities

Impacts to Public Health

Environment

Impacts to Vulnerable Populations

3 (Most Severe) Two or more Wards gt 7 days gt $1m High High High High

2 (Moderate Severe) Ward 1 - 7 days $100k - $1m Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate

1 (Least Severe)Neighborhood

(not entire Ward)

lt 1 day lt $100k Low Low Low Low

FIGURE 1 Scoring Criteria (Source Kleinfelder November 2015)

PHOTO CREDIT JOHN SONDERMAN SUSTAINABLE DC CLIMATE CHANGE PHOTO CONTEST

02INFRASTRUCTURE VULNERABILITY

amp RISK ASSESSMENT


02 INFRASTRUCTURE VULNERABILITY amp RISK ASSESSMENT

The overall functionality of a city is necessarily tied to its infrastructure much of which is either out of public view or simply goes unnoticed until it ceases to function Until now infrastructure design guidelines have been based on past weather patterns and events However those trends are changing raising the question of whether or not existing infrastructure will be sufficiently resilient in the future The following section outlines the infrastructure that were analyzed as part of this study

29

The Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of the infrastructure systems includes

bull Energy Infrastructure electric substations Information was not available to assess the natural gas generationdistribution and electrical transmissiondistribution systems

bull Transportation system Metrorail lines and stations regional railroad infrastructure roadways and Capital Bikeshare stations For road infrastructure we focused on roadways with an Average Annual Daily Trip (AADT) count of greater than 16000 this included bridges tunnels and underpasses It was assumed that impacts to roads would also disrupt bus service and cycling infrastructure

bull Water infrastructure stormwater and combined sewer collection systems including pipes outfall locations drainage areas pumping stations and the treatment plant The surface water supply source area drinking water treatment and distribution systems were not addressed since information was not available as part of the GIS database used

bull Telecommunications cellular towers The locations of AM and FM radio towers and other wireless communications towers were not available

The results of the vulnerability and risk assessment of built infrastructure are summarized in Figure 2 and Map 5 Figure 2 lists the infrastructure assets that are at highest risk to flooding and extreme heat by 2020 2050 and 2080 The assets that have been exposed to flooding from historic events are also indicated in the figure Map 5 presents the location of these high-risk infrastructure assets in relation to the different Wards within the District



MAP 5 Compilation of Infrastructure Most at Risk (Source Kleinfelder February 2016)

INFRASTRUCTURE MOST AT RISK

31

Infrastructure Type Name Historic 2020 2050 2080 2050 2080

E1 Electrical SubstationBuzzard Point Substation (ELP - 111 ELP - 122 ELP - 119)

Yes Yes Yes

E2 Electrical SubstationBlue Plains Substation (ELP - 128 ELP - 129)

Yes Yes Yes

E3 Electrical SubstationBenning Road Substation (ELP - 3 ELP - 103)

Yes

Roadway (gt16000 AADT) 12TH ST Expressway SW Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) Constitution Avenue NW Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) INTERSTATE 66 Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) Pennsylvania Avenue NW Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) Whitehurst Freeway NW Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) Benning Road NE Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) C ST NE Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) Kenilworth Avenue NE Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) Massachusetts Avenue NW Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) Minnesota Avenue NE Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) New York Avenue NE Yes Yes Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) 6TH ST NW Yes YesRoadway (gt16000 AADT) 9TH ST NW Yes Yes Yes

T1 Tunnel Capitol Crescent Trail (570 571) Yes Yes Yes YesT2 Tunnel RFK Stadium (436) Yes Yes YesT3 Tunnel Beach Drive at National Zoo (496) Yes Yes YesT4 Tunnel Capitol Crescent Trail (573) Yes Yes Yes

Bridge (gt16000 AADT) Chain Bridge NW Yes Yes Yes Yes

Bridge (gt16000 AADT) Francis Scott Key Bridge NW Yes Yes Yes Yes

Bridge Arland D Williams Memorial Bridge (14TH ST) Yes Yes Yes

Bridge Rochambeau Bridge (14TH ST) Yes Yes YesBridge Francis Case Memorial Bridge Yes Yes YesBridge Welsh Memorial Bridge Yes Yes YesBridge Benning Bridge Yes Yes Yes

M1 WMATA Metrorail Stations Federal Triangle Yes Yes YesM2 WMATA Metrorail Stations Federal Center SW YesM3 WMATA Metrorail Stations Archives-Navy Meml Yes Yes Yes Yes

WMATA Metrorail Line Yellow Yes Yes YesWMATA Metrorail Line Blue Silver Yes Yes YesWMATA Metrorail Line Green Yes Yes YesWMATA Metrorail Line Orange Yes Yes YesWMATA Metrorail Line Red Yes Yes Yes

Amtrak Line Mid-Atlantic Yes Yes Yes Yes

MARC Line PENN - WASHINGTON Yes Yes Yes Yes

Other CSX Line Kenilworth area Yes Yes Yes Yes

Other CSX Line I-295 right of way Yes Yes Yes Yes

B1 Capital Bikeshare Location Georgetown Harbor 30th St NW Yes Yes Yes Yes

B2 Capital Bikeshare LocationNannie Helen Burroughs amp Minnesota Ave NE

Yes Yes Yes Yes

S1 MS4 Stormwater OutfallMinnesota Ave SE amp Railroad Bridge SE

Yes Yes Yes Yes

S2 MS4 Stormwater OutfallNannie Helen Burroughs Ave amp Pedestrian Bridge

Yes Yes Yes Yes

S3 MS4 Stormwater Outfall49th St NE amp Nannie Helen Burroughs Road NE

Yes Yes Yes Yes

W1 Wastewater Pumping Station Potomac Pumping Station Yes Yes

W2 Treatment PlantBlue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant

Yes Yes Yes

W3 Wastewater Pumping Station Main amp O Street Pumping Station Yes Yes Yes

Te1Cellular Radio Transmission Tower

COLUMBIA LODGE 1844 3RD ST NW

Yes Yes Yes Yes


900 V Street NE Yes Yes Yes Yes

With the understanding that Metrorail Line segments and stations that are underground are not sensitive to heat

Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s

FIGURE 2 Compilation of Infrastructure Most at Risk (Source Kleinfelder February 2016)



A reliable and sustainable energy supply is crucial to the safety livability and economic vitality of the region In the District energy infrastructure includes electricity natural gas and petroleum supply and distribution systems In addition there is a growing local supply of renewable energy For the purpose of this study only electrical substations were available in GIS format hence their geographic location was identified and they were ranked according to the projected climate change impacts Gas and petroleum infrastructure are also vulnerable to climate change stresses and their distribution could be disrupted by extreme events However since spatial information was not available for these infrastructure systems they were not assessed in this study

The District is served by one electric distribution utility Pepco and imports nearly all of its electricity from outside of its borders While this study focuses only on facilities within the District it is important to note that the Districtrsquos electricity is transported over long-distance transmission lines and many of which are nearing the end of their useful life Higher electricity demands particularly for cooling will further stress these systems and increase their likelihood of failure

Electric substations have been assessed to determine if their functionality could be

compromised under the studyrsquos climate scenarios Many substations are located within areas that are currently vulnerable to flooding and are anticipated to be flooded in the future Three substations located in the 100-year flood plain are subject to existing flood related building codes However without a specific assessment of current flood-proofing measures that may have been implemented we conservatively assume that these are at risk of failing

Critical energy infrastructure might also be vulnerable to prolonged periods of extreme heat Substations are designed to run for a limited time using emergency response measures and prevent customer outages should one component fail However running at emergency ratings reduces equipment lifetime so repeated extreme heat events would affect equipment durability Additional emergency response measures to reduce the ambient heat of substation equipment and prevent failures such as misting and other tactics could be deployed during extreme heat events and would reduce vulnerability

The three electric substations identified as most at-risk to flooding are the substation in Ward 8 near the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant and the Anacostia River the Buzzard Point substation in Ward 6 near the Anacostia River and the Benning Road substation in Ward 7

ENERGY

33

Transportation infrastructure is fundamental to ensuring the efficient movement of people and goods as well as enabling critical services and emergency response efforts Disruptions to transportation systems directly affect citizens and businesses During extreme events transportation systems and roadways become critical assets for evacuation and emergency service providers Public transit is also important to provide access to hospitals healthcare facilities and shelters especially for residents without access to a car The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) conducted a Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment that identified classes of assets such as bridges and roadways vulnerable to change in temperature precipitation and sea level rise storm surge (DDOT 2013) This report analyzed the same classes of assets to identify those most likely to be impacted by flooding The economic and operational impacts of failure of the transportation infrastructure has been assessed in a qualitative manner as part of the risk ranking

RoadwaysMap 5 shows the high usage roads as defined by their AADT counts according to the US Department of Transportation (DOT) that were assessed to be most at-risk These roads are of particular importance for commuter and freight travel and are therefore highly consequential if impacted during a major weather event Many are also designated evacuation routes Any impacts to the road network along these segments would have cascading impacts on other critical services such as hospitals public safety as well as on commercial and business activities

This study assesses roadways with AADT above 16000 vehicles Many of these key roadways are at high risk of being impacted by flooding due to their proximity to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers In addition sections of important interior urban roadways such as Pennsylvania Avenue and Massachusetts Avenue are at risk of flooding

Overall it is assumed that the Districtrsquos roadway infrastructure is not highly vulnerable to heat This is primarily due to the low sensitivity of roadways to heat However taking into consideration that by 2080 there could be heatwaves lasting from 95 - 12 days current standards might need to be revised to prevent buckling

TRANSPORTATION



Tunnels Bridges amp UnderpassesAs the District is bordered by the Potmac River and bisected by the Anacostia River bridges are an integral part of all modes of the transportation system In addition to being critical routes for vehicular traffic multiple bridges are critical components of the subway and rail systems andor support bus routes

Most bridges along the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers are projected to face increased exposure to flooding impacts In this report a few key bridges such as the 14th Street Bridges7 and the Francis Case Memorial Bridge have been identified as most critical as they are part of the most heavily used roadways andor are part of the Metrorail and railroad network Tunnels that are part of the transportation network with higher roadway volumes as measures by AADT counts that are currently or will be exposed to flooding have also been identified

7 The 14th Street Bridge refers to the group of three highway bridges (Rochambeau George Mason Memorial and Arland Williams Memorial) a railroad bridge (Long) and a Metrorail bridge (Fenwick Metro Transit) that span the Potomac

35

WMATA Metrorail Lines amp StationsThe main form of public transportation in the region is the Metrorail operated by WMATA WMATArsquos rail and bus lines account for 85 percent of the public transportation in the region During peak ridership times many of the Metrorail lines are already at full capacity WMATA is in the process of upgrading six-car trains to eight-car trains to account for growing system traffic

As documented by the mapping of historic flooding Metrorail is already experiencing repetitive flooding in key locations including the Federal Triangle and Archives stations This flooding is likely to be exacerbated by increased precipitation Consequently many assets of the Metrorail system are identified as at-risk as early as 2020 WMATA received funding through the Federal Transit Administrationrsquos (FTA) Emergency Relief Program following Hurricane Sandy to mitigate flood risks The funding will be used to raise vent covers and make other improvements to block stormwater from entering Metrorail tunnels and also to install drainage improvements at 133 sites throughout system (FTA 2014)

For heat stress as for roadways it is assumed that current design standards (eg neutral temperature for continuous welded rail) might not be sufficient to prevent

buckling as heat stress is likely to increase significantly by 2080 Most of the Metrorail segments and stations in the District are underground and have cooling systems making them less sensitive and more able to adapt to increasing heat The aboveground segments that could be more vulnerable to heat impacts are the Yellow Line from LrsquoEnfant Plaza to Pentagon (this segment also crosses the Potomac River via the Yellow Line bridge) the Orange Line from Stadium Armory to Deanwood and the Red Line from NOMAGallaudet University to Brookland CUA Many of the above ground stations are in Maryland and Virginia outside of the Districtrsquos boundaries However when there are failures at these stations there are almost always service disruptions to the lines as they travel through the District This further highlights the need for cooperation among jurisdictions for future adaptation planning

RailroadRailroads represent 15 percent of public transportation and comprises the Virginia Railway Express (VRE) and the Maryland Area Regional Commuter (MARC) lines (MWCOG 2015) AMTRAK is also assessed as part of the regional and national system and a portion of the CSX line is assessed for freight transportation

Railroad segments are also already experiencing repetitive flooding in key

TRANSIT



locations such as the Amtrak Mid-Atlantic line in the District and the CSX line in the Kenilworth area This flooding is likely to be exacerbated by increased precipitation sea level rise and storm surge Consequently many assets are identified at risk as early as 2020

For heat stress several important railroad lines are aboveground and are therefore more exposed to increased temperatures It is assumed that current design standards might not be sufficient to prevent buckling as heat stress is likely to increase significantly by 2080

Bicycling InfrastructureThe Districtrsquos extensive bicycling infrastructure including dedicated bike lanes and the Capital Bikeshare system has grown significantly in recent years Bicycling can provide valuable alternative transportation options following a disaster In New York City following Hurricane Sandy pedestrians and bicyclists represented more than half the river crossings from New Jersey to Manhattan while the subway system was shut down and roads were congested (City of New York 2013) In response some 20000 New Yorkers who usually used other forms of transportation commuted by bike In the District Capital Bikeshare stations are powered by solar panels ensuring that they can provide service even during a power

outage The modularity and ease of installing stations gives Capital Bikeshare a high level of adaptive capacity For example temporary Bikeshare stations could be set up in key locations if transit service is disrupted In light of the growing rate of cycling and its importance in providing mobility in post-disaster situations Capital Bikeshare locations at risk of flooding have been identified

37

The water infrastructure system is essential to treat and distribute potable water to residents and commercial facilities provide flood protection and collect stormwater and wastewater throughout the District During extreme weather events water infrastructure and operations can be significantly impacted This assessment covers many forms of water infrastructure including the wastewater treatment plant wastewater and stormwater collection systems

As reported in the 2015 State of the Region Infrastructure Report while many of the regionrsquos drinking water and wastewater systems have made significant investments in upgrades and expansions large segments of water and wastewater pipes in the ground are 50 - 80 years old DC Water averages 400 to 500 water main breaks a year which are exacerbated by cold weather Accordingly DC Water has an extensive multi-billion dollar capital improvement program to update its aging infrastructure including replacing or repairing water mains and replacing valves and hydrants that will increase its resiliency (DC Water 2015)

Water Supply Treatment and Distribution InfrastructureThe drinking water supply treatment and distribution infrastructure in the District is owned and operated by DC Water and the Washington Aqueduct (managed by the US Army Corps of Engineers) DC Water distributes drinking water and collects and treats wastewater The Washington Aqueduct collects and treats drinking water at two plants - Dalecarlia and McMillan

These systems serve all of the Districtrsquos residents businesses institutions and government agencies The Districtrsquos water is sourced entirely from the Potomac River The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin conducts water demand and resource availability forecasts every five years Their most recent report included climate change forecasts (2015) The study concluded that an increase in precipitation could positively impact water availability and allow for meeting projected increases in demand in 2040 However it also reported that uncertainty remains and that despite an overall increase in precipitation periods of drought could impact the reliability of supply

In addition to impacts on the availability of supply the drinking water infrastructure system could be impacted during extreme weather events in the following ways

WATER



bull Contamination of the water supply source from polluted stormwater runoff from heavy rainfall events or from debris resulting from flooding upriver from the District

bull High-heat impacts to the unit operations in the water treatment plant

bull Flooding at entry points in the distribution system such as the air-release blow-off valves

bull Other impacts to the treatment plant under extreme weather events such as extended loss of power supply at the plant equipment inoperability or inability of plant staff to get to the plant

Stormwater Sewer and Combined Wastewater Collection SystemThe collection system for DC includes the sanitary sewer combined sewer and separate stormwater collection systems The collection systems include pipes manholes catch basins pump stations detentionretention structures and outfall structures DOEE and DC Waterrsquos sewer separation projects and stormwater management efforts are addressing localized flooding problems and water quality issues for existing conditions However the Districtrsquos collection system may be exposed to more extreme and frequent flooding conditions in the future due to the predicted increase in heavy precipitation events as well as inundation from sea level rise and storm surge

Few strategic stormwater outfalls have been identified to be at risk for flooding but more information such as the contributing drainage area to the outfall invert elevations of the outfalls stormwater pipe sizes and pipes that are above their design capacity (which were not available for this study) is required to perform a more thorough vulnerability and risk assessment It is also important to note that the storm sewer system in the District is designed to the convey stormwater for the present 15-year 24 hour storm which corresponds to 52 inches (according to NOAA Atlas 14) of rainfall Based on design storm projections developed as part of the ldquoClimate Projections and Scenario Developmentrdquo report published by DDOE the rainfall depth associated with this storm is projected to be 68 inches 71 inches and 8 inches by 2020s 2050s and 2080s respectively Therefore areas with storm sewers that are either at capacity or are already above capacity are more likely to experience more frequent and intense interior flooding driven by precipitation In addition to flooding impacts from extreme precipitation events the stormwater and combined sewer outfalls that discharge to the Potomac and Anacostia rivers and are at low elevations compared to mean sea level will also be prone to flooding from sea level rise and storm surge ldquobacking uprdquo through the piped infrastructure and potentially flooding low-lying interior areas It is recommended that the District needs to conduct detailed hydrologichydraulic modeling studies to understand the combined impacts of joint

39

flooding from sea level rise and extreme precipitation events in the future

Wastewater collected through the sanitary and combined sewer system is treated at the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant the largest advanced wastewater treatment plant in the world with a design capacity of 384 million gallons per day covering 150 acres (DC Water) DC Water is already adapting the plant which is located at one of the lowest points in the District along the Potomac River to climate change through the construction of a seawall with top elevation of 172 feet (DC Datum) protecting against the present 500-year flood elevation of 142 feet-(DC Datum) plus three feet to account for sea level rise (DC Water 2014) In addition to direct flooding impacts the plant could also be potentially vulnerable to extended power outages

In addition to flooding the increased frequency of severe rain events could have a negative impact on water quality due to increased runoff According to the Districtrsquos 2014 Integrated Report on Water Quality Assessment8 of the 36 waterbody segments monitored for the goals of the Clean Water Act that apply to the District no waterbody monitored fully supported all of its designated uses and hence were considered as impaired The Water Quality Map (Map 6) shows the number of official pollutants that cause water quality impairment as measured from recent sampling by DOEE The areas in red orange yellow are the most impaired

in terms of water quality and pollutant loading With increased precipitation under climate change scenarios the volume of stormwater runoff (both overland and from stormwater outfalls) to abutting water bodies are projected to increase This may cause an increase in pollutant loading andor increase the number of pollutants in the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries

For the vulnerability and risk ranking the number of pollutants reported in water bodies as well as the runoff co-efficient per Ward were factored A higher runoff coefficient means more impervious area and a lower coefficient means lower impervious area The surface water quality in most of Wards 5 and 7 and portions of Wards 6 and 8 is already impaired considering the large number of pollutants reported in these water bodies as shown in Map 6 Since these areas also have a higher runoff coefficient they are more likely to be vulnerable to water quality impairment due to increased stormwater runoff from more frequent and intense rainfall events as a result of climate change The higher share of impervious area in these wards implies that urban stormwater runoff could be one of the major sources of water quality impairment These targeted areas have the potential for implementation of green infrastructure which will have the dual benefit of mitigating stormwater runoff volume and improving water quality from increased infiltration and filtering out pollutants

8 The District of Columbia Water Quality Assessment 2014 Integrated Report to the US EPA and Congress (httpdoeedcgovsitesdefaultfilesdcsitesddoepublicationattachmentsIntegrated20Report20to20EPA20and20US20Congress20regarding20DCE28099s20Water20Quality20E28093202014_0pdf)



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River

Esri HERE DeLorme MapmyIndia copy OpenStreetMap contributors and the GIS user community

LEGENDNumber of Pollutants (Official)

5891416181921Known Flood Risk2020 Scenario2050 Scenario2080 ScenarioWater BodyDistrict of Columbia BoundaryWard Boundary

0 3000 6000

FeetLocations are approximatepound

MAP 6 Water Quality with flooding scenarios 2020 2050 and 2080 (Source Kleinfelder and DDOE DC November 2015)

Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


Esri HERE DeLorme MapmyIndia copyOpenStreetMap contributors and the GIS user community

5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary

Number of Pollutants (Official)

WATER QUALITY WITH FLOODING SCENARIOS

0 3000

Feet

6000

Locations are approximate

41

Telecommunication refers to the electronic transmission of information over distance including voice data and images Telecommunication networks are instrumental for information exchange and serve as crisis communication networks during a disaster The primary causes for telecommunication infrastructure failure during disasters are

bull Physical destruction of network components that are exposed to hazards such as flooding

bull Disruption of the supporting network infrastructure such as to the electrical distribution system

bull Network congestion

The telecommunication network as represented by AMFM radio towers cellular towers and TV towers are the rudimentary elements of the Districtrsquos communication grid which are still important channels for conveying information publicly Disruption of these communication networks could limit the publicrsquos accessibility to information through television and radio which may be used by a significant proportion of the population to receive emergency notifications

Only two telecommunication assets are identified to be at risk of flooding as documented by historic flooding These are the cellular radio transmission towers located at 1844 3rd Street NW and 900 V Street NE All remaining assets are outside

identified flooding areas for 2050 and 2080 However it should be noted that the telecommunications system is highly dependent on the energy system It is also anticipated that the system is resilient to heat and might only be impacted by 2080 when heatwaves gain in intensity and duration as system components may be subject to overheating Consequently according to available information the telecommunication system is considered to be marginally impacted by climate change but this should be revisited as more information is available

TELECOMMUNICATION


COMMUNITY RESOURCES VULNERABILITY amp RISK ASSESSMENT

03


03 COMMUNITY RESOURCES VULNERABILITY amp RISK ASSESSMENT

The following section presents an overview of the vulnerability of the facilities used by the District to provide important social services to people and their communities Many of these community resources such as public housing and senior wellness centers are especially important because of the role they play in providing support to residents that are most vulnerable to climate change impacts

45

As outlined in the following section vulnerable residents include those with less capacity to respond to disasters or who may be more sensitive to events such as heat waves For example seniors especially those on a fixed income have fewer financial resources to move should their home be damaged in a flood or they may be more likely to suffer negative health impacts during a heatwave Therefore senior housing as well as wellness centers that provide services to seniors are included as critical assets in this assessment This section focuses on the physical buildings that provide services to vulnerable populations as well as all District residents and the next section identifies the areas of the District where the largest number of vulnerable residents live

Key community resources addressed in this study include

bull District government agencies

bull Emergency services including emergency operations centers fire and police stations

bull Medical services including hospitals dialysis clinics primary care and interim care centers

bull Human services including libraries recreation centers and facilities operated by the Department of Youth and Rehabilitation Services

bull Schools and child care centers

bull Public housing nursing homes senior centers and homeless shelters

Figure 3 and Map 6 present a compilation of key community resources identified to be most at risk based on projected climate change impacts This first level assessment does not consider the specifics of each facilityrsquos building systems or flood-proofing but rather their location in areas likely to be exposed to flooding It has been assumed that all buildings have some means to cope with heat up to 2080 when substantial increase in heat wave intensity and duration would test the buildingsrsquo systems beyond the conditions they were designed to operate under Although it should be noted that buildings could be unusable in the event of a prolonged power failure during a heat wave A more detailed site-level assessment could provide additional information on adaptive capacity by identifying facilities with backup power adequate flood proofing air conditioning or passive cooling capabilities etc

The District Government has Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP plans) for all District agencies to ensure that critical services can be provided following a disaster or disruption The District also has mutual aid agreements in place with neighboring jurisdictions which help to minimize disruptions to services However a large-scale event with citywide or regional consequences would limit the Districtrsquos ability to identify alternative service providers and locations These factors have been accounted for in evaluating the potential consequence of damage to a facility



MAP 7 Compilation of Community Resources Most at Risk (Source Kleinfelder February 2016)

COMMUNITY RESOURCES MOST AT RISK

47

DEPARTMENT ADDRESS Historic 2020 2050 2080 2050 2080

DC1 Motor Vehicles Department of 2390 South Capitol Street SE Yes Yes Yes

DC2 Motor Vehicles Department of 95 M Street SW Yes YesDC3 Employment Services Department of 201 N Street SW Yes Yes

DC4 Executive Office of the Mayor1350 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Yes

EO1FBI Strategic Information and Operations Center (SIOC)

935 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Yes

EO2 Military District of Washington 103 3rd Avenue SW YesEO3 WMATA 600 5th Street NW YesEO4 DC Fire Operations Command Center 500 F Street NW YesEO5 DC DOH 77 P Street NE Yes

EO6 DCG - MPD - Public Safety Communications 310 McMillan Drive NW Yes

PS1 First District Polices Station 101 M Street SW Yes Yes

PS2 Public Safety Communications Center 310 McMillan Drive NW Yes

F1 Engine 27 Station 4201 Minnesota Avenue NE Yes Yes Yes YesF2 Fire Boats 1 2 and 3 550 Water Street SW Yes Yes YesF3 Engine 7 Station 1101 Half Street SW YesH1 Veterans Affairs Medical Center 50 Irving Street NW YesH2 Howard University Hospital 2041 Georgia Avenue NW YesH3 Childrens National Medical Center 111 Michigan Avenue NW Yes

Di1 Da Vita Georgetown 3223 K St NW Yes Yes Yes

Di2 Grant Park Dialysis5000 Nannie Helen Burroughs Ave SE

Yes Yes Yes

C1 Unity - Hunt Place Health Center 4130 Hunt Place NE Yes Yes

C2 Unity - Southwest Health Center 850 Delaware Avenue SW Yes Yes

C3 Careco 11 4501 Grant Street NE Yes

C4 RHD 401 56th Street NE Yes Yes Yes

HS1 Extended House (Buddys Place) 6023 Clay Street NE Yes Yes Yes

HS2DCG - Fire amp EMS Dept - Minnesota Ave Station

4201 Minnesota Avenue NE Yes Yes Yes Yes

HS3 DCG - Public Library - Deanwood Kiosk62nd Street NE and Banks Place NE

Yes Yes Yes

HS4 Marshall Heights - Willis Paul Greene Manor4215 Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue NE

Yes Yes Yes

S1 Drew Elementary School 5600 Eads Street NE Yes Yes Yes

S2 HD Woodson Senior High School 5600 Eads Street NE Yes Yes Yes

Cc1 Coast Guard Headquarters 2100 2nd Street SW Yes Yes Yes

Cc2 Safe And Sound Day Care Center4922 Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue NE

Yes Yes Yes

Cc3 Ola C Franks Child Development Center 1310 Ridge Place SE Yes Yes

Cc4 Federal Trade Commission Child Care Center600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Yes Yes Yes

Cc5 National Office CDC 1111 Constitution Avenue NW Yes Yes Yes

Nur

sing

H

om

es

Nu1Deanwood Rehabilitation and Wellness Center

5000 Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue NE

Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters

Sc1 Marshall Heights - Michaux Senior Center 3700 Hayes Street NE Yes Yes Yes Yes

PH1 Kenilworth Courts 4500 Quarles Street NE Yes Yes Yes Yes

PH2 Capitol Gateway 201 58th Street NE Yes Yes Yes

PH3 James Creek 1265 Half Street SW Yes Yes

PH4 Greenleaf 203 N Street SW Yes Yes

Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es

Hf1Southwest Community House Senior Service Center

1200 Delaware Avenue SW Yes Yes Yes

Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

FIGURE 3 Compilation of Community Resources Most at Risk (Source Kleinfelder February 2016)



District agencies are critical for the administrative support to the Districtrsquos residents commuters and workers visitors and businesses Municipal buildings have the capacity to provide operational and logistical support outside of their normal functions during emergencies These include key municipal buildings such as the John A Wilson Building (Wilson Building) specific agency headquarters and emergency operation centers

Of the facilities identified as at risk the Wilson Building is considered at highest risk as the offices located there provide critical administrative and emergency communication services The Wilson Building has experienced flooding in the past and will continue to be vulnerable in the future to flooding resulting from extreme precipitation as well as riverine and coastal flooding

COOP plans have been put in place to ensure essential District agency functions continue during an emergency to protect District residents and visitors Findings from this study should be coordinated with COOP efforts to ensure that alternate locations for agencies in the case of an emergency are moved to buildings that are not located in vulnerable areas

Emergency services including fire stations police stations and emergency operation centers are vital for emergency support and recovery during and immediately following a disaster or climate change-related event Consequently emergency services should be located in areas protected from flooding The Engine 27 Station on Minnesota Avenue and the Fire Boats 1 2 and 3 facilities are among the public safety facilities most at risk Engine 27 Station is within an area that has historically experienced flooding and is projected to flood in all of the scenarios in this study Fire Boats 1 2 and 3 are stored at a pier in the Washington Channel that could experience flooding by 2020 The boats may need to be moved up-river prior to a major flood event in order to be accessible for emergency operations in the aftermath

MUNICIPAL RESOURCES EMERGENCY SERVICES amp PUBLIC SAFETY

49

Medical services encompass assets and resources associated with public health These include hospitals ambulatory services dialysis and community-based public health programs This assessment of medical services focuses on assets located in the District only it does not consider the facilities belonging to the greater regional network that are outside of District boundaries There are three hospitals considered at risk of flooding under current conditions including the Veterans Affairs Medical Center Howard University Hospital and the Childrenrsquos National Medical Center It is important to note that the three hospitals identified at risk for historic flooding are all located in proximity to each other and even if some buildings providing health services are not directly impacted by flooding flooding of surrounding streets in this area could impede access The District should further study the implications to continuity of health care and services if an extreme flooding event were to impact all three hospitals This historic flooding is most likely caused by drainage capacity issues of the stormwater system in these areas which are likely to be exacerbated by more frequent and intense precipitation events in the future Of the seven documented dialysis clinics two are at risk one in Georgetown and one in Deanwood

Human services refer here to public and privates services and resources dedicated to supporting diverse sections of the population These include the Department of Human Services (DHS) the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services (DYRS) and other organizationsrsquo intermediate care facilities providing behavioral mental health and other forms of support to vulnerable groups Potential impacts from flooding may have significant consequences for a broad spectrum of communities that require access to these programs Public libraries recreation centers and post offices are also included as they provide gathering places and information services that enable members of the community to receive and ask for help Most of the human services facilities identified as at highest risk of flooding are located in Ward 7 near the Watts Branch of the Anacostia River

MEDICAL SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES



This assessment included K-12 schools and childcare facilities including special education facilities that serve students with special needs Schools and childcare facilities are valuable community assets and their closure can be disruptive and costly for families Most of the schools and childcare facilities identified as at risk of flooding under current conditions or by 2020-2050 are located in the floodplain of the Anacostia River and the Watts Branch impacting Wards 6 7 and 8

Public housing managed by the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) provides critical affordable housing for low-income families and individuals Residents of public housing have fewer resources to evacuate or relocate if their housing is damaged and there is little redundancy in the availability of affordable units to house households that may be displaced The public housing locations most at risk are Kenilworth Courts in Ward 7 (290 units) Capitol Gateway in Ward 7 (29 units) James Creek in Ward 6 (239 units) and the Greenleaf complex in Ward 6 (493 units) Combined these developments provide 1051 housing units Greenleaf also includes a senior center and the Southwest Family Enhancement Career Center which provides job training and family support services

Senior centers and nursing homes were also assessed Due to age mobility and other health-related concerns the elderly are more sensitive and therefore more vulnerable

SCHOOLS PUBLIC amp SENIOR HOUSING SHELTERS

51

to climate change-related impacts such as flooding and heatwaves Disruptions to power supply could also create high risks for senior housing that lack backup power or have insufficient power to provide heating and cooling The Deanwood Rehabilitation and Wellness Center in Ward 7 is considered the most at-risk senior housing facility

Homeless shelters have also been assessed as they support highly vulnerable populations The Southwest Community House Senior Service Center which is co-located with the Greenleaf Senior housing noted above is at risk of flooding in the 2050 scenario While the District has emergency shelter capacity for homeless individuals and families a disruption such as flooding or power outage to even one facility could have significant consequences for the entire District

PHOTO CREDIT MISTY BROWN SUSTAINABLE DC CLIMATE CHANGE PHOTO CONTEST

VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

04


04 VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

The vulnerability of the social environment is assessed in two parts ndash vulnerable population and community resources that are deemed critical to the support of vulnerable populations The latter includes a broad variety of community based organizations and facilities that were considered in Section 3 of this report Equity is an integral consideration for climate change and vulnerable populations are at increased risk They are disproportionately affected in post-disaster response and recovery and more susceptible to negative health impacts associated with a changing climate ( Melillo et al 2014) Communities that prepare for the impacts of climate change can become more resilient as they rebuild and a first step is to identify populations and neighborhoods most at risk with the metropolitan area Hurricane Katrina and its resulting desperation desolation and dislocation also brought into stark relief the intersection of natural disasters human social systems and the built environment (Shannon et al 2012) The storm and subsequent flooding dramatically and tragically exposed longstanding patterns of inequality that left some populations more vulnerable than others to the consequences of disaster It is acknowledged that anticipated outcomes of the on-going recovery efforts in New Orleans and surrounding areas will be uneven across different social units and many will never recover

Heat has been the largest single weather-related cause of death in the US since NOAA began reporting data for heat in 1988 In addition heat impacts on health are the most well understood measurable and yet preventable impacts of climate change For many simply being older obese or diabetic are risk factors for heat-related morbidity and mortality (Basu and Samet 2002) It is also recognized that those with respiratory or circulatory disease face greater physiological challenges during extreme or prolonged heatwaves (Anderson and Bell 2009) A large number of studies have characterized health responses during and following severe heat waves such as the European heat wave of 2003 (Vandentorren et al 2004) and the 1995 heat wave in Chicago

POPULATION AT RISK

55

The social vulnerability assessment has been performed to identify where the most vulnerable populations live in the District Social vulnerabilities are often more challenging to categorize and rank than those in the built environment since they are defined by a complex set of demographic economic and health factors that impact an individualrsquos sensitivity to climate change and adaptive capacity Sensitivity to climate change is based on social and biophysical aspects that might predispose individuals to being more sensitive to climate impacts such as heatwaves and flooding Adaptive capacity refers to an individuals ability to adapt and respond to the stresses caused by climate change Social indicators of sensitivity and adaptive capacity were derived from the

demographic and place-based indicators as reported in the Sustainable DC Plan9 10

Unemployment educational attainment (those without a high school diploma) and poverty prevalence were used as proxies for populations with less access to medical care or ameliorating living conditions such as access to air conditioning and with less financial resources to cope with disruptions These indicators affect both sensitivity and adaptive capacity Rates of obesity and adult asthma and age were used as a proxy for those less physiologically able to cope with flooding and heat and who therefore are more sensitive The methodology used for identifying the most vulnerable populations is further described in Appendix 1


9 ldquoSeniorrdquo as reported in US Census data (2014) for population of 65 years and above has been added the indicators from Sustainable DC as a key indicator of sensitivity to heat 10 Metrics and methodology Attachment titled Social Vulnerability and Ranking Protocol for a complete report on the methodology for determining the vulnerable population index are reported in Attachment titled Social Vulnerability and Ranking Protocol11 The Indicators are Census based Social Indicators per Wardas reported in Sustainable DC

Sensitivity Adaptive Capacity

Unemployment Unemployment

Educational attainment (without HS diploma)


Poverty prevalence Poverty prevalence

Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior

FIGURE 4 Sensitivity and Adaptive Capacity Indicators11



The purpose of this assessment is to provide a first step in identifying areas with the greatest number of residents vulnerable to the impacts of climate change There are other factors that more comprehensively define vulnerable populations such as adults and children who have mobility limitations or developmental disorders non-English or limited-English speakers and immigrant communities Subsequent analyses should include these factors

Map 8 illustrates the wards with the largest number of vulnerable residents and which climate impacts (heat or flooding) will likely impact each The shades of blue represent if the ward is likely to be impacted by flooding as reported in the climate change scenarios for 2020 (purple) 2050 (dark blue) or 2080 (light blue) Vulnerable populations likely to be most impacted by heat as informed by social and biophysiological indicators are illustrated by shades of orange and red for 2050 and 2080

Mapping the vulnerability rankings of the wards illustrates that social vulnerability is not evenly distributed across the city Populations at risk (as defined by a high sensitivity and low adaptive capacity) are located in Wards 1 5 and 6 with the largest populations in Wards 7 and 8 The easternmost Wards 5 6 7 and 8 are home to the largest number of vulnerable populations and are also

vulnerable to flooding Ward 4 also has large numbers of residents vulnerable to heat

The difference in population per Ward was not considered At the time data was compiled for the Sustainable DC Plan Ward 7 had the lowest population (65777) and Ward 6 had the highest (83821) Density per Ward could be an additional indicator of possible stress to flood and heat exposures by increasing the number of people effected by a particular event or disruption like a power outage and in need of emergency services

57

MAP 8 Vulnerable Populations per Ward (Source Kleinfelder February 2016)

VULNERABLE POPULATIONS PER WARD

PHOTO CREDIT ALEXANDRA HAY SUSTAINABLE DC CLIMATE CHANGE PHOTO CONTEST

NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS

In the Climate projections and Scenario Development report we reviewed the science to determine how climate change is likely to impact the District In this report we assess the vulnerability of the Districtrsquos infrastructure community resources and populations to those impacts and prioritized them based on the risks

61

It is important to emphasize that the climate scenarios used for this report present a combination of possible flood and extreme heat events which can be considered as ldquoprobable futuresrdquo that serve as guidance for future adaptation planning These projections are meant to be reviewed and updated as the science of climate change evolves with new tools and is informed by revised observed trends

Following the Vulnerability Assessment the team will create an Adaptation Plan to help implement some of the changes that will need to occur in the District in order to respond to the climate change projections and identified vulnerabilities in Tasks 1 amp 2 Reports

An important next step will be to combine resources and to refine the message from the District as a whole Key actions include

bull Develop the governance structure and partnerships with lead agencies stakeholders who have parallel efforts ongoing

bull Establish schedule for completion of remaining assessments noted herein while establishing metrics + evaluation approaches

bull Identify funding sources and lead agencies for remaining assessments

bull Begin discussions regarding publicpublic-private financing and detailed implementation strategies


Anderson B G amp Bell M L 2009 Weather-related

mortality how heat cold and heat waves affect

mortality in the United States Epidemiology

(Cambridge Mass) 20 205-13

Basu R amp Samet J M 2002 Relation between

Elevated Ambient Temperature and Mortality

A Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence

Epidemiologic Reviews 24 190-202

City of New York 2014 PLANYC - A Stronger More

Resilient New York Chapter 10 Transportation

Church JA PU Clark A Cazenave JM Gregory

SJevrejeva A Levermann MA Merrifield GA

Milne RS Nerem PD Dunn AJ Payne WT

Pfeffer D Stammer and AS Unnikrishnan 2013

Sea Level Change In Climate Change 2013 The

Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working

Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK and

New York NY USA

District of Columbia Department of Energy and

Environment 2015 District of Columbia Wildlife

Action Plan 2015 A Conservation Strategy for

Washington DC httpdoeedcgovservice2015-

district-columbia-wildlife-action-plan

District of Columbia Office of Planning 2015

2009-2013 ACS Key Demographic Indicators

District of Columbia State Data Center http

planningdcgovsitesdefaultfilesdcsitesop

publicationattachmentsKey20Indicators20

200920-202013pdf

District of Columbia 2012 Mayorrsquos Task Force

Report on the Prevention of Flooding in

Bloomingdale and LeDroit Park httpocadcgov

pageflood-prevention-task-force

District of Columbia 2013 Sustainable DC Plan

httpsustainabledcgovsitesdefaultfilesdc

sitessustainablepage_contentattachmentsDCS-

00820Report205083jpdf

District Department of Transportation (DDOT)

2013 Climate Change Adaptation Plan http

ddotdcgovpublicationddot-climate-change-

adaptation-plan

DC Water Capital Improvement Program 2015

httpswwwdcwatercomaboutcip

Interstate Commission on the Potomac River

Basin 2015 Washington Metropolitan Area Water

Supply Reliability StudyDemand and Resource

Availability Forecast for the Year 2040 httpwww

potomacriverorgfocus-areaswater-resources-

and-drinking-watercooperative-water-supply-

operations-on-the-potomaclong-term-planning

IPCC Scenario Process For AR5 mdash Representative

Concentration Pathways page httpsedacipcc-

dataorgddcar5_scenario_processRCPshtml

accessed March 5 2015

Federal Transit Administration 2014 Resilience

Projects in Response to Hurricane Sandy http

wwwftadotgov15138_16147html

Kalkstein L S Sailor D Shickman K Sheridan S

Vanos J 2013 Assessing Health Impacts of Urban

Heat Island Reduction Strategies in the District of

Columbia Global Cool Cities Alliance

Melillo Jerry M Terese (TC) Richmond and Gary

W Yohe Eds 2014 Highlights of Climate Change

Impacts in the United States The Third National

Climate Assessment US Global Change Research

Program 148 pp Retrieved from httpnca2014

globalchangegovreport sectorshuman-health

REFERENCES

63

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Center for Operational Oceanographic Products

and Services httptidesandcurrentsnoaagov


Historical Hurricane Tracks httpcoastnoaagov

hurricanes


2012 Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the US

National Climate Assessment NOAA Tech Memo

OAR CPO-1 Silver Spring MD Climate Program

Office


2012 Hurricane Irene Service Assessment


2014 Sea Level Rise and Nuisance Flood Frequency

Changes around the United States httpwww

noaanewsnoaagovstories201420140728_

nuisancefloodinghtml


NOAA Climate at a Glance httpwwwncdcnoaa

govcag Accessed March 5 2015

Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

2015 State of the Region Infrastructure Report

Shannon Van Zandt Walter Gillis Peacock

Dustin W Henry Himanshu Grover Wesley E

Highfield and Samuel D Brody 2012 ldquoMapping

Social Vulnerability to Enhance Housing and

Neighborhood Resiliencerdquo Housing Policy Debate

221 29

Quigley John M and Rosenthal Larry A

ldquoHurricane Katrina Catastrophic Impacts and

Alarming Lessonsrdquo in Risking House and Home

Disasters Cities Public Policy eds Berkeley Public

Policy Press 127 2008 httpurbanpolicyberkeley

edupdfCh07_Tierneypdf

Sustainable DC Plan 2005-2009 httpsustainable

dcgovsitesdefaultfilesdcsitessustainable

page_contentattachmentsDCS-00820

Report205083jpdf

Stoner A K Hayhoe X Yang and D Wuebbles

2011 An Asynchronous Regional Regression Model

to Downscale Daily Temperature and Precipitation

Climate Projections Intl J Climatology 33 11

2473ndash2494

Tierney Kathleen Tierney ldquoHurricane Katrina

Catastrophic Impacts and Alarming Lessonsrdquo in

Risking House and Home Disasters Cities Public

Policy John M Quigley and Larry A Rosenthal

eds Berkeley Public Policy Press 127 2008

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) ER 1100-

2-8162 Incorporating Sea Level Change in Civil

Works Programs 2013

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) North

Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study 2015

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Climate

Change Adaptation Comprehensive Evaluation of

Projects with Respect to Sea-Level Change http

wwwcorpsclimateusccaceslcurvescfm

United States Census Bureau httpquickfacts

censusgovqfdstates11000html

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Questions About Your Community Indoor Air

httpwwwepagovregion1communitiesindoorair

html

Vandetorren S Suzan F Medina S Pascal M

Maulpoix A Cohen J-C amp Ledrans M 2004

Mortality in 13 French cities during the August

2003 heat wave American journal of public health

94 1518-20

Virginia Railway Express (VRE) 2015 httpwww

vreorgfeedbackfrequently_asked_questions

faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

This research was funded by the District of Columbia Sustainable DC Innovation Fund (DOEE ID 2013-9-OPS)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY amp ENVIRONMENTTommy Wells DirectorMaribeth DiLorenzo Deputy Director Urban Sustainability AdministrationKate Johnson Climate Program Analyst Phetmano Phannavong Environmental Engineer

Produced in collaboration withPERKINS+WILLAmy Thompson Project ManagerJanice Barnes PrincipalDouglas Pierce PrincipalJon Penndorf Sustainability Leader

KLEINFELDERLisa Dickson Principal in ChargeNathalie Beauvais Project ManagerIndrani Ghosh Lead ModelerNasser Brahim Vulnerability AssessmentKarin Hagan GIS Lead

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

FEBRUARY 2016




5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW 13

01 METHODOLOGY 17



EXPOSURE TO HEAT 24

RISK ASSESSMENT 25


ENERGY 32

TRANSPORTATION 33

TRANSIT 35

WATER 37





MEDICAL SERVICES 49

HUMAN SERVICES 49

SCHOOLS 50



05 NEXT STEPS 57

REFERENCES 62



CONTENTS


7






















EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

9









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY









11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

FEBRUARY 2016




5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW 13

01 METHODOLOGY 17



EXPOSURE TO HEAT 24

RISK ASSESSMENT 25


ENERGY 32

TRANSPORTATION 33

TRANSIT 35

WATER 37





MEDICAL SERVICES 49

HUMAN SERVICES 49

SCHOOLS 50



05 NEXT STEPS 57

REFERENCES 62



CONTENTS


7






















EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

9









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY









11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW 13

01 METHODOLOGY 17



EXPOSURE TO HEAT 24

RISK ASSESSMENT 25


ENERGY 32

TRANSPORTATION 33

TRANSIT 35

WATER 37





MEDICAL SERVICES 49

HUMAN SERVICES 49

SCHOOLS 50



05 NEXT STEPS 57

REFERENCES 62



CONTENTS


7






















EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

9









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY









11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


7






















EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

9









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY









11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

9









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY









11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

9









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY









11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY









11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

11










EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

13




Energy

Transportation

Water

Telecommunication

COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Municipal Resources

Emergency Services

Medical Services

Human Services

Schools

Public Housing


OVERVIEW









EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH








EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

15



01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


01METHODOLOGY


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


01 METHODOLOGY








19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

19









01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


01 METHODOLOGY


2020



20506



2080






21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

21


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


01 METHODOLOGY


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND






Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

23


Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Anaco

stia

Rive

r

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND







Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

ma c

R ive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

costi

aRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River


LEGEND



01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH


01 METHODOLOGY







EXPOSURE TO HEAT

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

25



RISK ASSESSMENT



Cost of Damage

Impacts to Public

Safety Services



Environment





(not entire Ward)





amp RISK ASSESSMENT




29











31



Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes


Yes















Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes

FLOODING HEAT

Yes Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

by

nam

eb

y na

me

NA

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sto

rmw

ater

Bic

ycle

Tele

com

W

aste

wat

er

Yes

Rai

lro

adl

ine

(tra

ins)

NA

Ro

adw

ays

(gt16

00

0 A

AD

T)E

nerg

yM

etro

rail

Bri

dg

esTu

nnel

s










ENERGY

33





TRANSPORTATION






35







TRANSIT







37






WATER









39









Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River




0 3000 6000



Potomac River

PotomacRiver

Poto

mac

Rive

r

Tidal Basin Ana

cost

iaRi

ver

Anaco

stia

River



5

8

9

14

16

18

19

21

Known Flood Risk

2020 Scenario

2050 Scenario

2080 Scenario

Water Body


Ward Boundary



0 3000

Feet

6000


41








TELECOMMUNICATION



03




45















47





Yes










Yes Yes Yes









Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes





Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes


Nur

sing

H

om

es



Yes Yes Yes Yes

Sen

ior

Cen

ters






Ho

mel

ess

Fac

iliti

es



Ho

usi

ng

Yes

Pub

lic

Ho

usin

g

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sch

oo

ls

Yes

Dia

lysi

s C

linic

s

Hu

man

Ser

vice

s

Chi

ldca

reD

ept

of

Yo

uth

Reh

ab

Sch

oo

l

FLOODING

Em

erg

ency

O

per

atio

ns

Cen

ters

Po

lice

Sta

tio

ns

Fir

e S

tati

on

s

Ho

spit

als

DC

A

gen

cies

Em

erg

ency

Ser

vice

sM

edic

al S

ervi

ces

Pri

mar

y C

are

HEAT

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes









49










51





04





POPULATION AT RISK

55











Obesity

Adult asthma

Senior









57




NEXT STEPS

05


05 NEXT STEPS


61




























New York NY USA











200920-202013pdf












adaptation-plan



























REFERENCES

63






hurricanes





Office


















221 29










Report205083jpdf





2473ndash2494








Works Programs 2013












html





94 1518-20



faq_heat_ordershtm

arearesearchorg

AREA RESEARCH

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLAN FOR THE ......2016/06/21 · climate change effects. Vulnerability...

Documents

Transcript of CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION PLAN FOR THE ......2016/06/21 · climate change effects. Vulnerability...