CLICS on WIKIPEDIAno more… (!)

I, Eric Parein, was roaming internet when I came across CLICS on Wikipedia. Wow, I was not aware the remnants of my brainchild LOKBLOK was displayed for the world!

However it didn't look good; too commercial. Wiki doesn't like that.

I went to look how LEGO does it. Wow again, nicely informative; especially the 'History' part was eye opening. Hey, CLICS should offer the same!

Before going any further I'd like to inform the reader that Wiki asks its visitors to contribute to the subject by any possible information. Off course, only if it's true and directly related. And... Wiki asks to corroborate (prove) the feed whenever possible.

So, I went back to CLICS and removed all publicity, like the product's conditionings. The page now was rather bleak, so I went on editing the history; a subject, being the inventor of the real thing, I know all about! So, to the mentioned patent, I had been attributed, I joined a direct link to the Patent Registration office. And to display the for sure good intentioned -but its ill performing outcome- alterations, I joined a link to have a visual on YouTube; it showed how ill designed the CLICS are, they easily bend or even break in two sharp pieces. This involves quality and safety issues.

CLICS sued me for the latter, they argued my video was 'very negative and tricked'! Upon this, I subpoenaed the matter; the result thereof showed my video to be very true indeed. The more, things were much worse I first thought! The case was dropped. Now, in fact, if you drop the 'tricked' notion from the initial charge, then only remains 'very negative'... Yes indeed!

For the 'slander campaign' charge, no slander (lies) could be produced, then no list for sure. So that was dropped also. But, for my proper editing CLICS on Wiki I was fined 5.000 euro / hour(!) damaging the so called CLICS brand. First thing: CLICS is not a registered brand; 1. It cannot be because it has no distinctive character, 2. It has a relating technical aspect and 3. it mimics the sound of each other penetrating CLICS. Secondly: Why this paper? Well, CLICS insinuated I entered CLICS on Wiki, but I did not!I only edited it. Yes with three links to prove it!!!

To prove the above: please find under, the 'Revision history of Clics' from Wikipedia itself, starting on 3 July 2006 by 'Podweb' (?); Eric Parein DID NOT enter CLICS; on discovering CLICS on Wikipedia, he only edited it, as from 23 August 2007.

The Removal by 'demon', not by undersigned:(I couldn't do it, if I wanted to, I didn't enter the CLICS item)

My truthful edited version:

First paragraph, three links are corroborating Eric Parein's editing.

One can summarise the above:wondering why CLICS has no more CLICS-referring page on Wikipedia...