Click to edit Master text styles LEADER Axis implementation State...
Transcript of Click to edit Master text styles LEADER Axis implementation State...
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
LEADER Axis implementation State of play, as of October 2013
Pedro Barbosa, DG AGRI and Marina Brakalova, ENRD CP
11th LEADER Sub-Committee
11/11/2013
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Total number of selected LAGs per MS (LAG database, DG AGRI – G.3)
336
264 244
221 192
163
112 108 92 86 63 56 53 51 51 43 40 36 35 33 31 29 26 25
5 4 3
PL ES DE FR IT RO CZ UK HU АТ SE FI PT DK LT GR LV IE BG SI NL SK EE BE LU CY MT
2
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Selected LAGs vs Targets per MS (LAG database, DG AGRI – G.3 and monitoring data, 2012)
АТ BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK
LAGs in 2013: 2402 Targets 2007-2013: 2302
3
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Progress on LAG selection in the EU
651
1458
2182 2239 2287 2402
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
4
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Total area covered by LAGs compared to Total MS area (LAG database, DG AGRI – G.3)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
AT
BE
BG CY
CZ
DE
DK EE EL ES FI FR HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK
EU-2
7
5
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Average LAG area (km2) (Annual Progress Reports, 2012)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
АТ
BE
BG
n/a CY
CZ
DE
DK EE ES FI FR GR
HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK
EU
6
Average LAG area in EU: 1 663 km2
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Average population covered by selected LAGs (Annual Progress Reports, 2012)
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
АТ
BE
BG
n/a CY
CZ
DE
DK EE ES FI FR GR
HU IE IT LT LU LV MT
NL
PL
PT
RO SE SI SK UK
EU
7
Average population in LAG area in EU: 59 447
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Share of Axis 4 in RDP total budget 2007-2013
(Financial data 2012)
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
АТ BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK EU
EAFRD (%) Total Public (%)
8
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Total EAFRD expenditure of Axis 4 vs. Total programmed EAFRD expenditure
(Financial Data, June 2013)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
NL EE AT CZ BE FI UK DK IE SI DE LV SE PT LU LT SK PL ES FR HU IT MT BG CY GR RO EU
9
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Progression in EAFRD declared expenditure for Axis 4 at EU level (millions €) June, 2013
0 0 0 0 0 6 2 18 11 20
38
65 44
57
104
136
111 117
160
190
146
181 197
269
170 190
383
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
10
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Information on committed LEADER funding (through the opENRD survey, Nov, 2013 based on received responses)
11
90%
105%
90%
29%
100% 94%
80%
54%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
CZ EE CY FR LU HU DE IT FI
411
411
103% 105%
56% 54%
99%
21%
60%
34%
77%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
CZ EE CY FR LU HU DE IT FI
412
412
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Information on committed LEADER funding (through the opENRD survey, Nov, 2013 based on received responses)
12
92%
105%
93% 89% 87%
63%
94%
53%
80%
56%
90%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
CZ EE CY LT PT FR LU HU DE IT FI
413
413
86%
105%
92%
67%
100%
28%
96%
12% 10%
91%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
CZ EE CY LT PT FR LU HU IT FI
421
421
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Information on committed LEADER funding (through the opENRD survey, Nov, 2013 based on received responses)
13
102%
90%
59% 58%
92% 100% 100% 97%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Axis 4
Axis 4
100%
91% 90%
100% 100%
64%
100%
88%
100% 94%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
CZ EE CY LT PT FR LU IT FI LV
431
431
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Initial RDPs approved in 2007 & 2008
Latest RDPs modifications approved up until July 2013
+/- %
€8.9 billion €9.2 billion +3%
€810 million €808 million -0.3%
€312 million €269 million -14%
€6.1 billion €6.2 billion +2%
€444 million €423 million -5%
€1.3 billion €1.5 billion +14%
LEADER Axis budget modifications: beginning of the programming period up until June 2013
(Preliminary findings)
14
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
On average Axis 4 budget increased by 16% in 13 Member States.
In 7 Member States Axis 4 budget decreased by 7% on average.
In 26 RDPs the initial measure budget decreased by 34% on average.
34 RDPs increased their initial measure budget by 43% on average.
Reduction of most Axis 4 measures: M411 (-4%), M412 (-3.5%), M421 (-1.9%) and M431 (-1.3%).
Measure 413 budget increased by 8.5% in comparison to 2012.
Budget modifications screening exercise : initial findings for LEADER Axis
15
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
LEADER Axis budget modifications: beginning of the programming period up until June 2013
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK EU
16
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
State of play of LEADER in Croatia (IPARD)
• LEADER measure accredited – 30.04.2013
• Allocated budget for 2007-2013 period
– Total allocated budget : 5.073.000€
– Total contracted budget : 3.600.000€
• Number of contracted LAGs:
– 30 LAGs have been contracted by the PA – in March 2013
– 12 LAGs are expected to be contracted by the PA – end of 2013
17
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
• Area covered by LEADER
– Total area eligible for financing under LEADER in Croatia – 50.000 km² (88% of total area of Croatia); eligible area is rural area excluded towns above 25.000 inhabitants and capital Zagreb
– Total area covered by 30 LAGs – 26.200 km²
• Population covered by LEADER
– Total population eligible for financing under LEADER in Croatia – 2.660.000 (62% of total population in Croatia);
– Total population covered by 30 LAGs – 1.055.000
18
State of play of LEADER in Croatia (IPARD)
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Transnational cooperation
19
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Projects with LAGs as LEAD partner (SFC, Oct, 2013)
381 projects 66
58
44
36
22
18 15
13 13 12 11 10 9 8 8 8 8 6
4 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
N of TNC projects (SFC, Oct 2013)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
PartnerLEAD
21
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
N. of projects started
N. of projects approved
N. of TNC projects started and approved per year (SFC, Oct. 2013)
22
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
General features of the TNC projects (SFC, Oct. 2013)
• Average duration: approximately 2 years
• Max: 6 years
• Average number of partners: 2,6
• Maximum number of partners: 16
23
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level 2 partners
67%
3-4 partners 19%
5-6 partners 7%
7-16 partners 7%
N. of partners per TNC project (SFC, Oct. 2013)
24
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Budget range of the TNC projects (SFC, Oct. 2013)
2.000-50.000 33%
50.000-100.000 18%
100.000-500.000 31%
>500.000 7%
No data available 11%
25
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
N of TNC projects (indicated through opENRD forum 11.2013)
26
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
CY DE EE FR LU LV PT SK UK
SFC
opENRD
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Still available budget and possibility to apply for TNC
(opENRD survey, Nov, 2013- 16 responses)
27
6
8
2
Yes
No
N/A
FR LT EE DE FI IT
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Main challenges with completing LEADER 2007-2013 (opENRD survey, Nov, 2013: 16 responses)
• Completing LDS while planning next one
• Ensure 20%/80% rule at every LAG level
• Still 30% to be paid in 2014-2015
• Liquidity and needs for upfront funding for project implementers
28
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Main challenges with completing LEADER 2007-2013 (opENRD survey, Nov, 2013: 16 responses)
• The conflict between the decision making and the paying processes: “Who decides after all what is eligible”
• No possibility to use resources of the current programming period when preparing the next on
• Limited national funding
29
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Main challenges with transition to LEADER 2014-2020 (opENRD survey, Nov, 2013- 16 responses)
• CLLD planning - Administrative system to coordinate and define roles MAs and PA without overly burden of LAGs
• Selection of LAGs in a period of programmes overlap
• Turnover with LAG staff
• Changing the areas
• LAGs survival: a gap between last and first payment for LAGs
30
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level – Fourth level
» Fifth level
Thank you!
31