Clause for Confusion - c.ymcdn.comc.ymcdn.com/.../2016_handouts_/F3-_Secor_ppt._66_pgs.pdf ·...
Transcript of Clause for Confusion - c.ymcdn.comc.ymcdn.com/.../2016_handouts_/F3-_Secor_ppt._66_pgs.pdf ·...
Clause for Confusion: TheDetermina,onofSocialMaladjustmentinthe
Evalua,onofEmo,onalImpairmentDonnaSecorPennington,LMSW
Michigan Mandatory Special Educa9on Pe99on Drive 1972
• Grassrootscampaigntoprovidespecialeduca,ontoallpersonswithdisabili,es.
• MASSWwaspartofthecampaign/pe,,ondrive• Predatedthefederallawandprovidedaddi,onalservices• Mandatedinclusionofschoolsocialworkersontheevalua,onteamforE.I.
• Michiganistheonlystatewiththismandate
F3:Secor
Educa9on for All Handicapped Children Act 1975
• Thedefini,onandcriteriaforthedisabilitycategory“Emo,onallyDisturbed”havebeenriddledwithcontroversyandconfusion.
• Thereiswidespreadrecogni,onthateffortstoprovideeffec,veeduca,ontochildrenwithemo,onal/behavioralproblemshavebeenlargelyinadequate.
• Studentswithemo,onalandbehavioraldisordersarethemostunderservedgroupofalldisabilitygroups
• FamiliesareoQenblamedfortheirstudent’sdisability• EIstudentshigherratesofdelinquency,incarcera,on,schooldrop
out,teenpregnancy,suicideandsubstanceabuse
F3:Secor
Challenges: Students with Emo9onal and Behavioral Disorders
• Problemofeligibilityisthemostpressingconcern(Forness&Walker2000)
• Epidemiologicales,matesindicatethatapproximately20%ofstudentsexhibitamentalhealthdisordercausingatleastmildfunc,onalimpairment(BazelonCenter2004)
• 80%increaseinrateofhospitaliza,onsofchildrenwithdepression
• Percentageofstudentsiden,fiedunder“E.D”hasremainedconstantatabout1%(U.S.Dept.ofEduca,on,2008)
• StateDifferences:RangefromVermontat1.44%toArkansasat.012%
F3:Secor
SeriousEmo+onalDisturbanceDefini+on
Congresswassearchingforadefini,onfor“SeriousEmo,onalDisturbance”(SED)andeventuallydecidedtoborrowthedefini,on
fromastudy.
F3:Secor
BowersStudy-1957
EliBowerslandmarkstudyof6000schoolchildrenin200classroomsin75schooldistrictsacrossthena,on• 207childrenweredesignatedas“emo,onallydisturbed”(3.5%)
• (162boysand45girls)Majordifferencesinbehaviorbetweenthedesignatedandnon-designatedstudentsresultedinthefivecharacteris,csincludedinthefederaldefini,on.
F3:Secor
FiveCharacteris,cs1. Aninabilitytolearnthatcannotbeadequatelyexplainedbyintellectualsensoryorhealthfactors
2. Inabilitytobuildormaintainsa,sfactoryinterpersonalrela,onships
3. Inappropriatetypesoffeelingsorbehaviorsundernormalcircumstances
4. Ageneralpervasivemoodofhappinessanddepression5. Atendencytodevelopphysicalsymptomsandfearsassociatedwithpersonalorschoolexperiences
F3:Secor
FederalDefini,onofE.D.(E.I.orE.B.D.) • Oneormoreofthefivecharacteris,cs
• Addi,onally,Emo,onalDisturbanceincludesSchizophrenia• Overanextendedperiodof,me• Adverselyaffectseduca,onalperformance.
F3:Secor
FederalEIDefini,on-Reac,ons
• Vagueandhighlysubjec,ve(Gresham2005)
• Nebulousanduncertain(Jenson&Clark2004)• LacksconsistencywithDSMlanguage/categories• “Whensuchdefini-onslimitorprescribewhomayormaynotreceiveservices,thedefini-onalproblembecomessignificantforstudents,theirfamiliesandschools.”
F3:Secor
SociallyMaladjustedExclusion• TheBowersstudyanditsproposeddefini,ondidNOTincludetheclause
"doesnotincludechildrenwhoaresociallymaladjustedunlessitisdeterminedthattheyareseriouslyemo-onallydisturbed.”• Thelegisla,vehistoryandotherhistoricalcircumstancesdonotsupporttheno,onthatthesociallymaladjustedweremeanttobeexcluded.
• Congresssimplyintendedtoexcludejuveniledelinquents?• EliBowercalledit“inherentlyillogical”sincetheemo,onallydisturbedchildwouldbesociallymaladjustedinschool.
“Thefinaladdendumregardingsocialmaladjustmentisincomprehensible”
(Kauffman,1997)
F3:Secor
Where did this phrase come from? • Firstusedinfederalgrantstotrainteachersfor“Excep,onalChildren”
• 1957:“Excep,onalchildrenincludeschildrenwhoaremaladjusted,socially&emo,onally.”
• 1963:SMandEDweregroupedtogether• “Highlyirregularpoli,calmove”–referredtocommipeeonInterstate&ForeignCommerce.HereitwasfirstdeterminedthatSMcouldbedis,nguishedfromED(OfficeofSchoolReformin
• "Non-handicappeddelinquentstudentswhoseonlydifficul,eswerean,-socialbehavior.”
F3:Secor
The Social Maladjustment Exclusion: Issues of Defini9on and Assessment
“Historicalandlegalanalysessuggestthat,farfromrepresen-ngacongressionalintenttoexcludechildrenwithconductdisorders,thesocialmaladjustmentexclusionmaybe
liAlemorethananhistoricalanomaly”
F3:Secor
Fewchangestodefini,onsince1975
ChildrenwithAu,smremovedfromE.D.Theterm"seriously"wasremoved.(IDEA1997)• NochangesinIDEA2004• “Thedefini-onofanemo-onaldisturbances-llallowsfortheexclusionofchildrendeemed“sociallymaladjusted”basedontheconceptualiza-onofBrowerin1957.Itishigh-metoabandonthisobsoletedis-nc-oninfavorofservingallchildrenwhoselearningisadverselyaffectedbyemo-onalorbehavioraldifficul-es.”
JimRaines,2004Professor&SSWAAPresident
F3:Secor
What does it mean?? Federalandmoststatestatutesandregula,onsare“silent”
regardingadefini,onof“socialmaladjustment”
Lackofunderlyingtheore,calfounda,onforthedefini,onandconsistentprocessestoaddressthecriteria.
F3:Secor
Few States State Regula9ons
• SomeexcludeStudentswhohave:• Persistentpapernofan,-social,rule-breakingbehaviororaggressivebehavior,includingdefiance,figh,ng,bullying,disrup,veness,exploi,venessanddisturbedrela,onswithpeersandadult.
• Californiarelatedserviceregula,ons:• “Deliberatenoncompliancewithacceptedsocialrules,ademonstratedinabilitytocontrolunacceptablebehaviorandtheabsenceofatreatablementalhealthdisorder.+
F3:Secor
Why Include Socially Maladjusted Students?
• Professionalresponsibili,es(ethics)• Co-morbidity&variablesymptomatology• Psychometricerrors(ra,ngscales,informants)• Avoidexclusionofdifficultstudents(includingsuspensions/expulsions)
• Thesechildren,ifnottreated,tendtopersistintoadulthoodwiththeirinappropriateinterpersonalandsociallydeviantbehavioroQenresul,ngincriminalac,vity,poormaritaladjustmentandsocialrela,ons,andwork-relatedproblems.
• Weareunder-iden,fyingstudentswithsignificantmentalhealthneeds
F3:Secor
Why Exclude Socially Maladjusted Students?
• IntentoftheLaw• BudgetaryConstraints• ProfessionalResponsibility(Ethics)
• Responsibilitytocolleagues,employer• Prognosis• ProgramIntegrity
F3:Secor
Case Law Basics
1. Does the law apply to me? • Jurisdiction: see map • Fact pattern: similar enough?
2. If yes, what is the law? • Holding versus dicta
3. Has the law changed? • Overturned by different case, new statute or new regulation
F3:Secor
Eighth Circuit [AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD]
Facts of A.C. case: • adolescent female with long history of school refusal, classroom disruption, profanity, insubordination, drug/alcohol abuse, running away from home, criminal conduct, suicide attempts & sexual promiscuity – conduct disorder • tuition for residential treatment $55,000 – school offered to pay 1/3 (not therapy/lodging costs) • services case, not qualification case Independent Sch. Dist. No. 284 v. A.C., 258 F.3d 769 (8th Cir. 2001)
F3:Secor
Eighth Circuit [AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD]
• Lower Court: – no evidence student was UNABLE to attend school; residential treatment not necessary to meet her EDUCATIONAL needs. • Appellate Court: – will not draw a “stark distinction between unwillingness and inability to behave appropriately” – emotional problems not separable from the learning process – Does emotional problem need “to be addressed in order for the child to learn”?
F3:Secor
Eighth Circuit [AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD]
Facts of Hansen case: • Male fifth grader with conduct disorder, bipolar disorder, and ADHD; behaviors included: – threatened to kill self and others; chronic poor academics • Administrative judge: – school didn’t present any evidence – judge wrote 1 paragraph decision saying school won • Lower court: affirmed Hansen v. Republic R-III Sch. Dist.,632 F.3d 1024 (8th Cir., 2011)
F3:Secor
Eighth Circuit [AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD]
Appellate Court: Parents win – Student has inability to build/maintain satisfactory relationships w/teachers & peers – Discredited testimony from Director of Special Education because only based on written reports, not observations – Sufficient evidence that ED caused academic problems
F3:Secor
Defining Legal Cases
Doe v. Sequoia Union High School District (1987). A Federal court ruled that a student with ongoing struggles with
authority, along with low tolerance for frustration, manipulation, impulsivity,
repeated violations of social norms and whose academic problems were due to substance abuse, truancy, and boredom with school was socially maladjusted, not
emotionally disturbed.. F3: Secor
Few Journal Ar9cles and Very LiTle Research
BarnepStudy(2012)E.D.vs.S.M.• Studyincluded8000studentsinschoolsandjuvenilecorrec,onsand27evaluators.
• Prac,,onerstookaholis,capproachtoeligibilityanddis,nguishedbetweenEIandSMwithrespecttothea) Natureofthestudent’sinterpersonalrela,onshipsb) Natureofthestudent’sbehaviorsc) Thestudent’sabilitytocontrolhisorheremo,ons
F3:Secor
Theme: Used a Collabora9ve Process
• ChildFind(ChildStudy)process• Collabora,ngwithpeers
• “Whatdoestheteamthink?”• Exploringe,ologyofbehavior• Linkingneedstoservices
F3:Secor
Theme:RecognizedNewStudentTrends
• Examples:• Substanceabuse• Exposuretoviolence–Post-trauma,cstressdisorder
Differen,aldiagnosisMuskegonHeights:MarquisGresham
• hpp://www.wzzm13.com/story/news/local/muskegon/2014/04/23/hackley-hospital-er-on-lockdown-following-shoo,ng/8069183/
F3:Secor
PosTrauma9c Stress Disorder • Exposuretoactualorthreateneddeath,seriousinjuryorsexualviolence
• Directlyexperiencing,witnessinginperson,experiencingrepeatedexposuretoaversivedetailsoftheevent,etc.
• Nega,vealtera,onsincogni,onandmoodincludingnega,vebeliefsandexpecta,ons“Iambad”“Noonecanbetrusted”
• Markedlydiminishedinterestorpar,cipa,oninsignificantac,vi,es• Feelingsofestrangement,recklessandself-destruc,vebehavior,irritablebehavior,angryoutbursts,problemswithconcentra,on
F3:Secor
Theme: Ethical Considera9ons
• NASWCodeofEthics:EthicalPrinciples• Helppeopleinneed• Challengesocialinjus,ce• Inherentdignityandworthoftheperson
• EthicalStandards:• CommitmenttoClients• CulturalCompetence&Diversity“Toassertthatthevastdispari-esineduca-onalandsocialoutcomesbetween
minoritychildrenandtheirwhitecounterpartsarenotrootedinpastandpresentraciallydiscriminatorypoliciesandpervasivebiasesistointen-onally
misdiagnosetheproblem.”F3:Secor
BarneT Conclusion
Advocatesforreconstruc-ngtheiden-fica-onprocessfromastudentcenteredperspec-vethataddressesthe
rightsandneedsofstudentswithemo-onalandbehavioraldisabili-es.
F3:Secor
ExternalizingDisorders
ConductDisorderorO.D.D.
Voluntary/Inten,onalBehavior
Psychopathy
MinnesotaModel:E.I.withData
OneTerm:ManyInterpreta,ons
F3:Secor
Externalizing vs. Internalizing Approach
• StudentswithE.D.internalizestheirproblemsthroughemo,ons• StudentswithS.M.externalizestheirproblemsthroughbehaviors• Behaviorforthesociallymaladjustedstudentismo,vatedbyself-gainandstrongsurvivalskills.
• Lackofageappropriateconcernfortheirbehavioranditseffectsonothers.
• Displaybehaviorwhichmaybehighlyvaluedwithinasmallsubgroup,butwhichmaynotbewithintherangeofculturallypermissiblebehavior.
F3:Secor
Externalizing vs. Internalizing
DisplaysocializedorunsocializedformsofaggressionAnxietyisgenerallynotrelatedtothemisbehaviorofsociallymaladjustedyouth,unlessitisduetothefearofbeingcaught.Intensityanddura,onofbehaviordiffersmarkedlyfrombehaviorstypicallyassociatedwiththeirpeergroup.
F3:Secor
Voluntary/Inten9onal Behavior
• Char-EmISDGuidelines(2012)• Socialmaladjustmentisconceptualizedasaconductproblem,inwhichstudentschoosenottoconformtosociallyacceptablerulesandnorms
• Inten,onalityisthedis,nguishingfeaturebetweensocialmaladjustmentandemo,onalimpairment*
F3:Secor
Char-Em ISD: SM Characteris9cs
• Extensivepeerrela,onshipswithinaselectpeergroup• Exploitsotherswithcharmormanipula,on• Reactswithappropriateaffectbutlacksappropriateguilt• Casualresponsewhenconfrontedaboutbehavior• Refusaltoadmitmistakesevenwhencaughtintheact• Inflatedposi,veself-concept
F3:Secor
Char-Em ISD: SM Characteris9cs
• Lackofempathyandlipleremorse–actsasvic,mevenwhenperpetrators
• Ignoresapemptsofotherstoaltertheirbehavior• Understandsrightfromwrong,butchooses“wrong”• Ra,onalizesbehaviorandminimizesimpact*Note:Inconsideringthisexclusionaryclause.thatinten;onalityrequiresadegreeofcogni;onanddevelopmentalmaturityseldomseeninyoungchildren.
F3:Secor
DSM5Approach:ConductDisorderA.Arepe,,veandpersistentpapernofbehaviorinwhichthebasicrightsofothersormajorage-appropriatesocietalnormsorrulesareviolated,asmanifestedbythepresenceofthree(ormore)ofthefollowingcriteriainthepast12months,withatleastonecriterionpresentinthepast6months:Aggressiontopeopleandanimals
1.oQenbullies,threatens,orin,midatesothers.2.oQenini,atesphysicalfights.3.hasusedaweaponthatcancauseseriousphysicalharmtoothers (e.g., abat,brick,brokenbople,knife,gun).4.hasbeenphysicallycrueltopeople.5.hasbeenphysicallycrueltoanimals.6.hasstolenwhileconfron,ngavic,m(e.g.,mugging,pursesnatching,extor,on,armedrobbery).7.hasforcedsomeoneintosexualac,vity.F3:Secor
ConductDisorder–DSM5Destruc,onofproperty:
8.hasdeliberatelyengagedinfireseungwiththe inten,onofcausingseriousdamage.9.hasdeliberatelydestroyedothers’property(otherthan byfireseung).
DeceivulnessortheQ:
10.hasbrokenintosomeoneelse’shouse,building,orcar.11.oQenliestoobtaingoodsorfavorsortoavoid obliga,ons(i.e.,‘‘cons’’others).12.hasstolenitemsofnontrivialvaluewithoutconfron,nga vic,m(e.g.,shopliQing,butwithoutbreakingand entering;forgery).
F3:Secor
ConductDisorder–DSM5Seriousviola,onsofrules:
13.oQenstaysoutatnightdespiteparentalprohibi,ons,beginningbeforeage13years.14.hasrunawayfromhomeovernightatleasttwicewhilelivinginparentalorparentalsurrogatehome(oroncewithoutreturningforalengthyperiod).
15.isoQentruantfromschool,beginningbeforeage13years.B.Thedisturbanceinbehaviorcausesclinicallysignificantimpairmentinsocial,academic,oroccupa,onalfunc,oning.C.Iftheindividualisage18yearsorolder,criteriaarenotmetforAn,socialPersonalityDisorder
F3:Secor
ConductDisorder:SpecifySeverity
Mild fewifanyconductproblemsinexcessofthoserequiredtomakethediagnosisandconductproblemscauseonlyminorharmtoothers(e.g.,lying,truancy,stayingoutaQerdarkwithoutpermission).
Moderatenumberofconductproblemsandeffectonothersintermediatebetween‘‘mild’’and‘‘severe’’(e.g.,stealingwithoutconfron,ngavic,m,
vandalism).Severe
manyconductproblemsinexcessofthoserequiredtomakethediagnosisorconductproblemscauseconsiderableharmtoothers(e.g.,forcedsex,physicalcruelty,useofaweapon,stealingwhileconfron,ngavic,m,breakingandentering).
F3:Secor
Specify with or without “callous” and unemo9onal traits Thefollowingcharacteris,cs(2ormore)areshownpersistentlyoveratleast12monthsandinmorethanonerela,onshiporseung: Lackofremorseorguiltdoesnotfeelbadorguiltywhenhe/shedoessomethingwrong(exceptifexpressingremorsewhencaughtand/orfacingpunishment).Callous-lackofempathydisregardsandisunconcernedaboutthefeelingsofothers.Unconcernedaboutperformancedoesnotshowconcernaboutpoor/problema,cperformanceatschool,work,orinotherimportantac,vi,es.Shallowordeficientaffectdoesnotexpressfeelingsorshowemo,onstoothers,exceptinwaysthatseemshalloworsuperficial(e.g.,emo,onsarenotconsistentwithac,ons;canturnemo,ons‘‘on’’or‘‘off’’quickly)orwhentheyareusedforgain(e.g.,tomanipulateorin,midateothers).
F3:Secor
Opposi,onalDefiantDisorderDSM5
A. Apapernofangry/irritablemood,argumenta,ve/defiantbehaviororvindic,venesslas,ngatleastsixmonthsasevidencedbyatleastfoursymptomsfromanyofthefollowingcategoriesandexhibitedwithatleastoneindividualwhoisnotasibling.
Angry/IrritableMoodArgumenta,ve,DefiantBehaviorVindic,veness
F3:Secor
Opposi,onalDefiantDisorderDSM5
Childrenyoungerthan5–Behaviorshouldoccuronmostdaysfor6months.Childrenolderthan5–Behaviorshouldoccuratleastonceperweekfor6monthsB.Thedisturbanceinbehaviorisassociatedwithdistressintheindividualorotherswithinhisorhersocialcontext(family,peergroup)oritimpactsnega,velyonsocial,educa,onal,occupa,onalorotherimportantareasoffunc,oning.C.Thebehaviorsdonotoccurexclusivelyduringthecourseofapsycho,c,substanceuse,depressiveorbipolardisorder.Also,thecriteriaarenotmetfordisrup,vemooddysregula,ondisorder.
F3:Secor
Conduct Disorders: High Comorbidity
These children also have higher incidences of several disorders commonly associated with ED such as problems with attending, learning, and communication, anxiety and mood disorders, impaired social and academic functioning, and depression
(American Psychiatric Association, 2000)
In one study, 70% of special education students exhibited symptoms of S.M.
F3:Secor
PsychopathyApproachEvalua,ngthe“characterpathology”ofthechildtodifferen,atebetweenE.I.andS.M.,specificallypsychopathy.InsteadofanAxis1dx.,wearelookingforapersonalitysyndrome.Superficialcharm,shallowaffect,egocentricity,impulsiveness,lackofguiltoranxiety.Childrenwhomayexploitothersandneedadifferentapproachtointerven,on.(Structureandconsequences)Ra,ngScales:HarePsychopathyChecklistYouthVersion(PCL-YV)AvailablefromMul,-HealthSystemsChildhoodPsychopathyScale(1997)www1.psych.purdue.edu/~dlynam/cpspage.htm
F3:Secor
• ScreeningandEvalua,onforSeriousEmo,onalDisability• SocialMaladjustment
• Differen,aldiagnosisforsocialmaladjustmenthasbeenplaguedbyamul,tudeofmeasurementproblems.Extensivereviewofthemethodologyfordis,nguishingseriousemo,onaldisturbanceandsocialmaladjustmentindicatesthatthereisnoassessmentdeviceormethodologywhichisbothtechnicallyadequateandvalidatedspecificallyforthepurposeofdis,nguishingsocialmaladjustment(Skiba&Grizzle,1991).
F3:Secor
• Iftheprac,,onerinthefieldsuspectsachildhasbehavioraloremo,onaldifficul,es…theevalua,onteammustconductacomprehensivemul,-facetedevalua,on….Theresultsofsuchevalua,onshouldbetheprimaryconsidera,onforeligibilitydetermina,on.
• Foreduca,onalpurposes,medicaland/orpsychiatricdiagnosesdonot,inandofthemselves,qualifyachildasseriouslyemo,onallydisturbed.Thiseligibilitydetermina,oncanonlybemadebyaproperlycons,tutedIEPteamofpersonsknowledgeableaboutthestudent.
• If,aQerreviewingtheresultsofanappropriateevalua,on,theteamissa,sfiedthatthestudentmeetsthecriteriaforseriouslyemo,onallydisturbed,itisinconsequen,alwhetherthestudentmayalsobesociallymaladjusted.Underthefederalandstatedefini,ons,ifthechildmeetsoneormoreofthefiveiden,fyingcharacteris,csandthefourconsidera,ons,heorsheiseligibleforspecialeduca,onservicesregardlessofthepresenceorlackofsocialmaladjustment.
F3:Secor
Connec9cut State Department of Educa9on
• Whendeterminingeligibilityforspecialeduca,onunderthecategoryofED,itisalsocri,calthatthePPTconsiderlinguis,cdifferencesandculturalinfluencesintheanalysisandinterpreta,onofstudentbehavior.
• Bestprac,cesuggeststhatPPTsfocusoncriteriaprovidedinIDEAwhenassessingforthecharacteris,csofED.
• "OnceEDcriteriaaremetanyevidenceofsocialmaladjustmentisirrelevantforpurposesofdeterminingeligibilityforspecialeduca,on"(McConaughyandRiper,2008).
F3:Secor
“MinnesotaModel”Approach
• Review state criteria • Determine severity and duration • Determine educational impact of problem • Determine how data dis/confirm each of the 5
characteristics • Determine need for services
F3:Secor
Step #1A: Meet at least 1 criteria? - inability to learn and - Inability to maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships - Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings - General pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression; - Tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears Step #1B: Is the problem of sufficient duration and intensity to constitute a disability?
for a long period of time (duration) to a marked degree (severity)
Step #2: ED causing the academic problem? “condition . . . Adversely affects a child’s educational performance” Is it ED, rather than SM, that causes the difficulties?
F3:Secor
Extended period of time?”
Six weeks, six months, one year? (Six months) What does chronic mean?
Sustained, frequent, acute? How to rule out situational or transitory problems?
What is a “marked degree?” Overt and observable in educational settings? Intra- and/or interpersonal disturbance? Point of comparison? What is significant?
How to determine adverse affect? Grades, standardized tests, classroom performance? Is failure required to be considered? Academics only or do social-emotional functioning, social skills, …?
F3:Secor
U9lize E.I. criteria supported by Data
SchoolRecordsPastInterven,onsSystema,cObserva,onsBehavioralRa,ngScalesSocial/DevelopmentalHistoryClinicalInterviewsDSMDiagnosis
F3:Secor
SSWAA Resolu9on Statement on Social Maladjustment (2005)
“Thistermhasprimarilybeenusedtodenyservicestochildrenwhohavebrokenschoolrules.TheSchoolSocialWorkAssocia-onofAmericaendorsestheposi-onthatallstudentswhohavebehavioralproblemsthatinterferewiththeirabilitytolearninthegeneraleduca-onclassroomhavetherighttobeprovidedtheservicesandprotec-onsofstudentswhoareconsideredtobeemo-onallydisturbedundertheprovisionsofIDEIA2004.”
F3:Secor
References • Barnep,D(2012).AGroundedtheoryforiden,fyingstudentswithemo,onaldisturbance:Promisingprac,cesforassessment,interven,onandservicedelivery,ContemporarySchoolPsychology,Vol.16.
• Brock,Stephen(2015July22).Iden,fyingEmo,onalDisturbance:GuidanceforSchoolPsychologists,NASPSummerConferencePresenta,on.
• Charlevoix-EmmepISD(2012).Guidelinedocument,Iden,fica,onofstudentswithadisability,Emo,onalImpairment,retrievedfromwww.charemisd.org
• Gacono,C.&Hughes,T.(2004)Differen,a,ngEmo,onalDisturbancefromsocialmaladjustment:Assessingpsychopathyinaggressiveyouth,PsychologyinSchools,Vol.41(8).
• Hochbaum,D.,Emo,onaldisturbanceandsocialmaladjustment:DoingawaywiththeIDEA’s“SocialMaladjustmentExclusionaryClause”hpp:/www.nasponline.org/conven,ons/2013/handouts/pa/Dis,nguishingEmo,onalDisturbancefromSocialMaladjustmentALS2.pdf
• Kehle,T&Bray,M(2004).Emo,onalDisturbance/SocialMaladjustment:Whyistheincidenceincreasing,PsychologyintheSchools,Vol.41(8)
• Merrell,K.&Walker,H.(2004).Deconstruc,ngadefini,on:Socialmaladjustmentversusemo,onaldisturbanceandmovingthefieldforward,PsychologyintheSchools,41(8).
F3:Secor
ReferencesPublicSchoolsofNorthCarolina,ScreeningandEvalua,onforSeriousEmo,onalDisturbance,Retrievedfrom:hpp://ec.ncpublicschools.gov/instruc,onal-resources/behavior-support/resources/screening-and-evalua,on-for-serious-emo,onal-disability
Quick,Kimberly(2016).Whyblacklivesmaperineduca,ontoo,TheCenturyFounda,on,Retrievedfromhpps://tcf.org/content/commentary/black-lives-maper-educa,on/
Raines,Jim(2006),ThenewIDEA:Reflec,onsonthereauthoriza,onforschoolsocialworkers,SchoolSocialWorkJournal,31(1).
Sadeh,S.&Sullivan,A.(2013).Dis,nguishingemo,onaldisturbancefromsocialmaladjustment,UniversityofMinnesota,Retrievedfromhpp://www.nasponline.org/conven,ons/2013/handouts/pa/Dis,nguishingEmo,onalDisturbancefromSocialMaladjustmentALS2.pdf
SchoolSocialWorkAssocia,onofAmerica(2005).Educa,onalrightsforstudentswithsocialmaladjustment,Resolu,onStatement,FRetrievedfromhpp://www.sswaa.org/?52.
WayneCountyRESA(2004)SocialMaladjustment:AGuidetoDifferen,alDiagnosis&Educa,onalOp,ons,Retrievedfromhpp://www.resa.net/specialeduca,on/spedcompliance/guidelinesandpublica,ons/
F3:Secor