CLAREMONT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION

CLAREMONT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION

MEETING AGENDA

“We are a vibrant, livable, and inclusive community dedicated to quality services,

safety, financial strength, sustainability, preservation, and progress

with equal representation for our community.”

City Council Chamber

225 Second Street

Claremont, CA 91711

Wednesday

September 25, 2019

7:00 PM

COMMISSIONERS

MARK SCHOEMANCHAIR

WAEN MESSNER BOB PERRY

BRIAN WORLEY JOHN NEIUBER SCOTT HORSLEY FRANK PERRI

CALL TO ORDER THE MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION

ROLL CALL

CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PRESENTATIONS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

SELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR1.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission nominate and select a

Chair and Vice Chair.

PUBLIC COMMENT

The Commission has set aside this time for persons in the audience who wish to comment on

items that ARE NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA, but are within the jurisdiction of the Architectural

Commission. Members of the audience will later have the opportunity to address the Architectural

Commission regarding ALL OTHER ITEMS ON THE AGENDA at the time the Commission

considers those items.

At this time the Commission will take public comment for 30 minutes. Public Comment will resume

later in the meeting if there are speakers who did not get an opportunity to speak because of the

30-minute time limit.

The Brown Act prohibits the Commission from taking action on oral requests relating to items that

are not on the agenda. The Commission may engage in a brief discussion, refer the matter to

staff, and/or schedule requests for consideration at a subsequent meeting.

The Commission requests, but does not require, speakers to identify themselves. When you

September 25, 2019 Architectural Commission Agenda

come up to speak, please state your name unless you wish to remain anonymous. Each speaker

will be allowed four (4) continuous minutes.

CONSENT CALENDAR

All matters listed on the consent calendar are considered to be routine. The Architectural

Commission or one or more Commissions and/or Committees have previously considered most of

the items on the consent calendar. The Commission may act on these items by one motion

following public comment.

Only Commissioners may pull an item from the consent calendar for discussion.

The Commission will waive reading of resolutions. Each resolution will be numbered following

Commission approval.

Now is the time for those in the audience to comment on the consent calendar. Each speaker will

be allowed four (4) continuous minutes to comment on items on the consent calendar.

ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 20192.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission approve the

Architectural Commission Meeting Minutes of September 11, 2019.

Draft Architectural Commission Meetings Minutes of September 11, 2019Attachment(s):

ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS - None

PUBLIC HEARINGS

Each speaker providing public comment will be allowed four (4) continuous minutes to speak,

which cannot be delegated.

ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN REVIEW #16-A09, REVIEW OF PROPOSED 63-FOOT

TALL STEEPLE/BELL TOWER TO SERVE AS A CONCEALED WIRELESS

TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR VERIZON WIRELESS LOCATED AT 509 S.

COLLEGE AVENUE. (#16-SUDP11, A STAFF-LEVEL SPECIAL USE & DEVELOPMENT

PERMIT REVIEW IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPLICATION) APPLICANT -

SMARTLINK, LLC ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS

3.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission adopt A RESOLUTION

(Attachment A) OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

CLAREMONT APPROVING FILE #16-A09, REVIEW OF PROPOSED

63-FOOT TALL STEEPLE/BELL TOWER TO SERVE AS A CONCEALED

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR VERIZON WIRELESS

LOCATED AT 509 S. COLLEGE AVENUE. (#16-SUDP11, A STAFF-LEVEL

SPECIAL USE & DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REVIEW IS ASSOCIATED

WITH THIS APPLICATION) APPLICANT - SMARTLINK, LLC ON BEHALF

OF VERIZON WIRELESS


Draft Resolution

Site Plan, Elevations, and Details

Photo Simulations

Attachment(s):

SIGN REVIEW FILE #19-S04 REQUEST FOR A NEW SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE

CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY BUILDING LOCATED AT 150 W. FIRST STREET.

APPLICANT - EAGLE SIGNS ON BEHALF OF CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY

4.

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission adopt A RESOLUTION

(Attachment A) OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

CLAREMONT APPROVING FILE #19-S04 REQUEST FOR A NEW SIGN

PROGRAM FOR THE CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY BUILDING

LOCATED AT 150 W. FIRST STREET. APPLICANT - EAGLE SIGNS ON

BEHALF OF CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY.

Draft Resolution

Proposed Sign Program

Attachment(s):

REPORTS

Commission

Mayor/Chair Meeting

Commissioner Comments

Staff

Briefing on Council Meetings

Briefing on Other Items

Upcoming Agendas and Events

ADJOURNMENT

THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE CLAREMONT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION WILL BE

HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 2019, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CLAREMONT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER, 225

SECOND STREET.

MATERIALS RELATED TO AN ITEM ON THIS AGENDA, AND SUBMITTED TO THE

ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AFTER PUBLICATION OF THE AGENDA, ARE AVAILABLE TO

THE PUBLIC IN THE CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AT 207 HARVARD AVENUE, CLAREMONT, MONDAY

THROUGH THURSDAY, 7 AM – 6 PM. SUBJECT MATERIALS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE ON THE

CITY WEBSITE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE - www.ci.claremont.ca.us. For more information, please call

the City Clerk’s Office at 909-399-5461.


IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 0F 1990, THIS AGENDA WILL

BE MADE AVAILABLE IN APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE FORMATS TO PERSONS WITH

DISABILITIES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO REQUIRES A MODIFICATION OR

ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN A CITY MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE

CITY CLERK AT 909-399-5461 “VOICE” OR 1-800-735-2929 “TT/TTY” AT LEAST THREE (3)

WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING, IF POSSIBLE.

I, NHI ATIENZA, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA,

HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING AGENDA WAS

POSTED AT CLAREMONT CITY HALL, 207 HARVARD AVENUE, ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2019,

PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2.

ANY ITEMS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN INITIATED BY 10:00 P.M. WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE

NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MEETING. FURTHER, ANY

ITEM INITIATED BEFORE 10:00 P.M. ON WHICH A CONCLUSION HAS NOT BEEN REACHED BY

10:15 P.M. WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE

ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION.

POST THROUGH: SEPTEMBER 26, 2019

Claremont Architectural Commission

Agenda Report

File #: 3053 Item No: 1.

TO: ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION

FROM: BRAD JOHNSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 2019Reviewed by:

Finance Director: N/A

SUBJECT:

SELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission nominate and select a Chair and Vice Chair.

PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS

This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies are available atthe City Hall public counter, Youth Activity Center, Alexander Hughes Community Center, and Citywebsite.

Submitted by: Prepared by:

Brad Johnson Nhi AtienzaCommunity Development Director Administrative Assistant

CLAREMONT Printed on 9/19/2019Page 1 of 1

powered by Legistar™


Agenda Report






SUBJECT:

ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2019

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission approve the Architectural Commission MeetingMinutes of September 11, 2019.


This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies are available atthe City Hall public counter, Youth Activity Center, Alexander Hughes Community Center, and Citywebsite.

Submitted by: Prepared by:

Brad Johnson Nhi AtienzaCommunity Development Director Administrative Assistant

Attachment:Draft Architectural Commission Meeting Minutes of September 11, 2019



ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

Wednesday, September 11, 2019 – 7 p.m. City Council Chamber

225 W. Second Street, Claremont, California

CALL TO ORDER Chair Schoeman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL

PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS HORSLEY, MESSNER, NEIUBER, PERRI, PERRY, AND SCHOEMAN

ABSENT: COMMISSIONER WORLEY ALSO PRESENT CHRIS VEIRS, PRINCIPAL PLANNER; LETICIA CARDOSO,

SENIOR PLANNER; NIKOLA HLADY, ASSOCIATE PLANNER; AND NHI ATIENZA, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT

CEREMONIAL MATTERS, PRESENTATIONS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Commissioner Perri acknowledged that on this day in 2001, 343 New York firefighters gave their lives defending America. He is very grateful for their sacrifice. PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Schoeman invited public comment. Seeing no requests to speak, public comment was closed. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Architectural Commission Meeting Minutes of July 24, 2019 Chair Schoeman invited public comment. Seeing no requests to speak, public comment was closed. Commissioner Neiuber moved that the Architectural Commission Meeting Minutes of July 24, 2019, be approved as submitted; seconded by Commissioner Perry; and, carried on a vote as follows: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HORSLEY, MESSNER, NEIUBER, PERRI, PERRY,

AND SCHOEMAN NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONER: WORLEY

natienza

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT

Architectural Commission Minutes September 11, 2019 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING 2. Review of Historical Property (Mills Act) Agreement Request #19-MA01 Between

the City and the Owner of the Property Located at 530 Berkeley Avenue. Applicant – Julie Steinbach

Associate Planner Hlady presented a PowerPoint presentation. The applicant, Julie Steinbach will address Commissioner Perry’s question regarding the work order. Julie Steinbach has been the owner of the property since 2002. She noted that she adores living in such a charming home with the history attached; and as a bonus it was once a Sears Roebuck kit house. In response to Commissioner Perry’s question regarding the order of the work to be done, she stated that the house is in desperate need of a new roof and paint job. Her insurance company has granted a one-year extension so that she may qualify for the Mills Act Agreement. The river rock foundation was repointed seven to eight years ago, so there is no need at this time. There is no identifiable need at the moment for the plumbing or electrical, but possibly in the future. Commissioner Horsley inquired about the current use for the screened in porch. Ms. Steinbach has designated the space as her guest room. The daybed in the space is great for reading and for out of town guests. Commissioner Perri inquired if the house has been bolted for seismic activity. Ms. Steinbach responded that she has just been accepted into the Earthquake Bolt and Brace program so it will be done soon. Principal Planner Veirs stated that foundation retrofit work is included in the work plan proposed by the applicant. Chair Schoeman invited public comment. Seeing no requests to speak, public comment was closed. Commissioner Perri is in favor of the project, which will improve and preserve the house for Claremont. He was concerned about the foundation, but noted that Ms. Steinbach will be taking care of it. Commissioner Horsley stated that this is a great house with a great story and deserves the historic attention. The porch is a defining historic character of the house and brings depth. The porch screening gives the house a flat appearance. He understands the intended use of the space, but a big piece of re-establishing the historic house would be to remove the screens, just like the house on Berkeley Avenue did recently when it restored a previously enclosed front porch. The applicant will also need to address the landscaping to expose the house. He is supportive of the project. Commissioner Perry supports the application and agrees with Commissioner Horsley regarding the porch. He is cautioned about alteration to historic homes. The defining features of the home are hidden by the screen and landscaping. Commissioner Messner agrees with all the comments and does not have any additional comments. The scope of work is reasonable and appropriate.

Architectural Commission Minutes September 11, 2019 Page 3 Commissioner Schoeman’s comments are as follows:

He appreciated Commissioners’ comments regarding the screen and corbel and suggestions.

The Mills Act is two-fold; 1) to ensure that the historical value if not lost by demolition by neglect and an opportunity for the City to maintain its historical resources, and 2) an opportunity for the City to ensure that the house does not fall into disrepair.

He appreciated Commissioner Perri’s comment regarding bolting the house to its foundation. During the process, he cautioned the applicant to not destroy the rock foundation or ruin the exterior view.

Looking at the original picture, he encouraged the applicant to reach out the Claremont Heritage for color suggestions and to open up the front porch.

He is happy that the applicant is taking advantage of the Mills Act to save Claremont’s resources.

Commissioner Perri suggested obtaining the services of a landscape architect to further expose the house. Commissioner Horsley suggested recreating the cheek walls on the front steps and step wrap as in the original picture. Principal Planner Veirs requested that Commissioner Neiuber recuse himself, out of an abundance of caution, since he appears to reside very close to 500 feet of the residence. Julie Steinbach will go through her historical records and building permits to see when the screen was installed. She inherited the landscaping from the previous owner, has no attachment to it, and will adhere to the Commission’s suggestions. David Shearer is mentoring her on the historically appropriate colors and trim designs. She then noted that she has no intentions of painting her house dark brown as she likes pretty colors. Upon consideration of the review criteria, Commissioner Perry moved that the Architectural Commission adopt Resolution No. 2019-09 of the Architectural Commission of The City of Claremont approving file #19-MA01, Review of Historical Property (Mills Act) Agreement Request #19-MA01 Between the City and the Owner of the Property Located at 530 Berkeley Avenue. Applicant – Julie Steinbach; seconded by Commissioner Perri, and carried on a vote as follows: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HORSLEY, MESSNER, PERRI, PERRY, AND

SCHOEMAN NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER: NEIUBER ABSENT: COMMISSIONER: WORLEY This decision can be appealed within ten calendar days.

Architectural Commission Minutes September 11, 2019 Page 4 3. Preliminary Review (File #18-A14) of the Architectural Design and Site Plan for a

13-Unit Residential Condominium Project at 365 West San Jose Avenue. Applicant – Feng Xiao Architect, Inc.

Senior Planner Cardoso presented a PowerPoint presentation and addressed Commissioners’ questions regarding: 1) elevators; 2) low income units; 3) square footage advantage due to low income units; 4) proposed city trees; 5) ADA adaptable units; 6) threshold for density bonus; 7) types/level of low income housing and where this one falls; 8) side setback; 9) maximum FAR; 10) maximum height; 11) the limit on how much building on a site; and 12) long term guarantee on low income housing. Feng Xiao, Principal Architect stated that Staff did a great job and provided a very detailed report. The company studied the surrounding neighborhood and reviewed previous projects in detail to deliver a quality product. She is also working with a good landscape architect to create usable open space. She looks forward to the Commissions’ comments and suggestions to produce a product that contributes to the neighborhood and is economically feasible for the owner. Commissioners did not have any questions for the applicant. Chair Schoeman invited public comment. Seeing no requests to speak, public comment was closed. Commissioner Messner’s comments are as follows:

Staff provided great suggestions and she is supportive of them.

She agrees that the small private patio spaces are not necessary and should be eliminated.

She is concerned about the common space since it is surrounded by parking, which is awkward. The architect needs to be more creative to create a restful area instead.

If there are no private spaces on the side setback, we should focus on enhancing the landscaping that is esthetically pleasing and provide for security. The site needs visibility.

Commissioner Perri echoed the same concerns. The guest parking count is low. There are a lot in a small space. He asked that the applicant look at the parking and private outdoor spaces. Commissioner Horsley’s comments are as follows:

On the next submittal, please provide a more developed/detailed landscaping plan.

Seems like all the green spaces have been robbed due to the density bonus.

For such large units, the side-yard space does not seem livable. Maybe a small patio will activate the side space to give it some personality. The three-foot patio barrier is not much privacy, but he is in favor of a small patio as opposed to only common area space. He wonders if there is an option to fence in the sides to make it feel more secure. There needs to be outdoor space for each unit.

Architectural Commission Minutes September 11, 2019 Page 5

He is not opposed to the central common space; it may be quite a busy space since we are so car centric.

He agrees with Staff on the stones.

He supports the trash gate.

He agrees that the art piece needs to be in a public arena.

For the front elevation, the rock needs to wrap along the front to give it a base.

Recommended the architect to look at how the LID requirements will impact the design.

Commissioner Neiuber’s Comments are as follows:

On the south elevation, the large massing is addressed with the variations in the shed, window sizes, and roof. It’s a good design.

He is in favor of the small patio area. It helps to break things up along the exterior. The majority of people will not enter their homes this way, therefore it will be private.

He agrees with Commissioner Horsley, he likes the field stones extended in the front to give it a stone foundation look.

He likes the flat-style floor plans; it’s what people want.

There is a lack of people that are able to afford housing. Although this is a dense project, it will address the low to moderate housing need. Before the state is able to mandate even higher densities, we should approve as many two-story buildings as possible. The units are ADA adaptable. There are limited common amenities; which means no HOA dues. He is fine with that as people are now doing their recreation away from their homes. It’s a good development for the area, a good design with a few tweaks, and will address the housing need.

He agrees with Staff’s recommendations, except to keep the enclosed patio spaces.

Commissioner Perry’s comments are as follows:

Agrees with the many comments and supports Staff’s recommendations.

He is not sure what two low income units will do to solve Claremont’s housing problem. He sees this as a compromise to the quality of the projects in the community.

The gain in density has translated into large units and compromise to the setbacks and open/private spaces.

The project needs to be re-assessed without the low income/density bonus to challenge the City to address the substandard building standards. This will persist site by site.

This has become a high density, apartment-like project with no enjoyable outdoor amenities. The trash receptacle on site is not normal and setback is compromised. There are too many undesirable changes to the aspect of life and development in the City.

Commissioner Schoeman’s comments are as follows:

This project is dense enough to be at the threshold for the next level of type of housing; podium. Individual garage parking may not be the model for this site. We need to look at projects of this density to see how to deal with the parking

Architectural Commission Minutes September 11, 2019 Page 6

situation. If we were to eliminate one unit, that would yield 2,000 sq. outdoor space. He just not sure where the breakeven threshold is for the owner.

He suggested putting the front entries next to the garage doors, which will leave the side yards completely private.

The four units on the ground level should have their entries at the center plaza. This will further engage and energize the plaza. It will also serve as a clear entry for the four units.

Make the driveway area feel like a public neighborhood, which will break up the space for balconies on the second floor.

He is not worried about the amenities since these units will be for sale but would like the front doors to face each other for the community feel.

The architect needs to find ways to hide the density with trees and variations.

He agrees with Commissioner Neiuber that the architecture is nice. The elevation is just lacking a vertical element to break up the horizontal element. This could which can be solved with field stones. A chimney or two would work.

On the west elevation, the rhythm can be broken up with front doors and porches.

This issue is not density; it’s more about massing, daily life issues, and how to house these people in a community.

He agrees with Staff’s recommendations, except for the private space. The units need more private outdoor space.

If the owner can afford it, this should be a pedestal project. There are just too many compromises.

The applicant did not ask for height, which may break up the massing. Commissioner Horsley agrees with Commissioner Schoeman’s suggestion to change the front entry. It will be difficult, but will help to pull people to the plaza and add to the pedestrian space. Commissioner Perry stated that Commissioner Schoeman proposed good ideas to the compromises. Pushing the unit out for the eight-foot setback and adding four-foot to the courtyard will feel more generous for the pedestrians. Feng Xiao appreciated the Commission’s comments and Staff recommendations and can work through it. The idea to switch the front entry is very creative and is effective in other communities. The challenge with the balcony is privacy. They are not at the LID level yet, but will meet with the civil engineer and landscape architect to address this issue. She is very appreciative of all the suggestions and does not have any solutions at this moment, but will work to make this project better. REPORTS

Commission Mayor/Chair Meeting There was no report.

Architectural Commission Minutes September 11, 2019 Page 7 Commissioner Comments Commissioner Neiuber stated that some of the newly planted trees on Indian Hill are already dead. Commissioner Perry replied that some of them do need water and Dave Rogers is a stronger believer to let the trees go through their cycle. Commissioner Neiuber commented that there has been a lot of comments on social media regarding the Foothill project and was wondering when it will be completed. Principal Planner Veirs stated November/December. Staff Briefing on Council Meetings Principal Planner Veirs reminded commissioners of the Commission Recognition Reception on September 24. Commissioner Schoeman updated the Commission on the Council’s decision to proceed with the ADU ordinance. Principal Planner Veirs reported on items of interest from the previous night’s City Council meeting. Briefings on Other Items There was no report. Upcoming Agendas and Events Principal Planner Veirs commented on what items will be coming before the Commission at the September 25, 2019 meeting. ADJOURNMENT

Chair Schoeman adjourned the meeting at 9:10 p.m. _________________________ Chair

ATTEST: _________________________ Administrative Assistant


Agenda Report






SUBJECT:

ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN REVIEW #16-A09, REVIEW OF PROPOSED 63-FOOT TALLSTEEPLE/BELL TOWER TO SERVE AS A CONCEALED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONSFACILITY FOR VERIZON WIRELESS LOCATED AT 509 S. COLLEGE AVENUE. (#16-SUDP11, ASTAFF-LEVEL SPECIAL USE & DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REVIEW IS ASSOCIATED WITH THISAPPLICATION) APPLICANT - SMARTLINK, LLC ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS

SUMMARY

The applicant has proposed a new 63-foot tall steeple or bell tower to serve as a concealed wirelesstelecommunications facility at the subject property on the west side of College Avenue, which isowned and occupied by a church, the Center for Spiritual Living. The tower is proposed to be locatedin front of the main church building in an open grassy area located behind a parking lot that frontsalong College Avenue. The proposed tower features a modernistic design with a trapezoidal footprintand angled trapezoidal support beams with stucco texture coated panels between them. The towerwould be painted an off-white color so as to be consistent with the existing church buildings and itsgeometry and design generally relate to the existing architecture on the site. A square 18-foot by 18-foot enclosure with 8-foot tall walls having a rock veneer designed to match the base of the churchwould surround the base of the tower along with perimeter plantings. The top of the tower featuresan embossed star-burst image that corresponds to the Center for Spiritual Living’s visual motif.

The Claremont Municipal Code (CMC) requires that wireless telecommunications obtain architecturaldesign review approval pursuant to CMC Section 16.300 - Architectural Review as well as approvalof a Special Use and Development Permit (SUDP), a staff-level approval pursuant to CMC Section16.306. Staff finds that the proposed tower is well-designed and that it fits into the site andneighborhood context in a manner that will not detract from the use of the property nor the overallcharacter of the residential property in which it is located. Staff believes that the proposed projectsatisfies all of the architectural design review criteria, and that all of the required SUDP findings canbe met. Should the Architectural Commission vote to approve the proposed design plans, staffintends to issue approval of the associated SUDP.



RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission adopt A RESOLUTION (Attachment A) OF THEARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT APPROVING FILE #16-A09,REVIEW OF PROPOSED 63-FOOT TALL STEEPLE/BELL TOWER TO SERVE AS A CONCEALEDWIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR VERIZON WIRELESS LOCATED AT 509 S.COLLEGE AVENUE. (#16-SUDP11, A STAFF-LEVEL SPECIAL USE & DEVELOPMENT PERMITREVIEW IS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPLICATION) APPLICANT - SMARTLINK, LLC ONBEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS

Alternatives to the Recommendation

In addition to the recommendation, there are the following alternatives:

A. Continue the item for additional information.

B. Approve the project with additional or revised Conditions of Approval.

C. Express intent to deny the proposal, specifically identifying the review criteria ofSection16.300.060.A of the Municipal Code that cannot be met and continue the item to October9, 2019, for adoption of a denial resolution as all of the necessary findings cannot be met.

Background

The subject property is located on the west side of College Avenue to the south of Oak Park Drive.The large property has a total of 118,957-square feet (2.7 acres) and is owned and utilized by theCenter for Spiritual Living, a church. The property features a zoning designation of ResidentialSingle Family (RS 8,000) and a General Plan Designation of Residential 2. Churches are permittedin the city’s residential zones with approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The property featuresa 15,420-square foot church building that was built in 1959 and large surface parking lots on the eastand west sides of the property.

The Oak Park Manor assisted living facility abuts the subject property to the north along with single-family residential properties fronting Oak Park Drive. Single-family residences are located on theeast side of College Avenue across from the party. An oversized single-family residential propertywith vehicular access from College Avenue abuts the subject property on its west side. The CollegeOaks Townhomes condominium complex abuts the subject property to the south.

The CMC requires new wireless telecommunication facilities to obtain approval of a Special Use andDevelopment Permit (SUDP) pursuant to CMC Section 16.100.040.C as well as architectural designreview approval pursuant to CMC Section 16.300.030.B. The Architectural Commission is taskedwith reviewing the architectural design of the proposed tower. The Federal CommunicationsCommission (FCC) sets standards for radio frequency (RF) emissions generated by wirelesstelecommunication facilities and prohibits the City from establishing its own standards or for denyingwireless facilities based solely on health concerns.



Project Description

The applicant, Smartlink Wireless, LLC has proposed a 63-foot tall tower to serve as a wirelesstelecommunications facility for Verizon Wireless. The tower features a trapezoidal footprint withdimensions of 11’-10” by 11’-4” and would house 12 panel antennas, three dual mount brackets and12 Remote Radio Units (RRU) and one microwave dish, along with other minor equipment. Asquare, 18-foot by 18-foot enclosure with 8-foot tall battered (sloped) walls would secure the tower.The resulting lease area is 324-square feet. The tower is proposed to be located in a landscape areain front of the main sanctuary of the church. The location approximately 50-feet away from thesouthern property line, just over 124-feet away from eastern property line, and 80-feet from thenorthern property line. Consistent with the development standards for wireless telecommunicationsfacilities in CMC Section 16.100.040.E the proposed tower is located at least 100-feet away from theclosest residential structure, which in this case is located in the College Oaks Townhomesdevelopment to the south.

Staff worked with the applicant to revise the design of the proposed tower from an original proposalthat resembled a three-legged guard tower in the middle of the rear parking lot, to what is currentlypresented for review by the Architectural Commission. Generally, staff works with wireless applicantsto achieve a design that has a minimal adverse visual impact on its surroundings. In the case of newwireless facilities such as the proposed steeple or bell tower, staff looks to existing structures on theproperty to reference notable design features in an effort to have the facility blend with existingdevelopment rather than stand out as wireless facility. In the case of the Center for Spiritual livingproperty, the main church building, with its large swooping gable roof serves as the most remarkablearchitectural feature on the property. Staff directed the applicant to consider a design that featured aseries of visually appealing angles and a general form that departed from a strictly rectangular towerstructure. After several iterations, the applicant presented the design shown in the submitted plans(Attachment B) as one that they believed satisfied staff’s direction, the CMC’s 12 architectural designreview criteria and is one that is buildable given that applicant’s project budget.

The proposed tower features a trapezoidal building footprint with the narrower base on the south sideof structure and the wider base on the north side. The narrower side of the tower has a width of 7’-4”while the wider side reaches a width of 11’-4”. The north and south sides of the tower featurehorizontal steel support beams spaced apart at varying lengths going up the tower. While the steelsupport beams on the north and south side of the tower are horizontal, those on the east and westsides of the tower feature alternating angles, given the tower’s trapezoidal shape. The angledsupport beams on the east and west side of the tower create architectural interest as they move upthe tower. Consistent with the angled design of the tower, the top of the tower, which reaches amaximum height of 63-feet, is sloped, with the highest edge located on the north side of the tower.The spaces between the tower’s steel columns would be filled by stucco coated fiberglass reinforcedplastic (FRP) panels that do not interfere with the passage of radio frequency (RF) emissions fromthe wireless antennas located near the top of the tower, 48’-6” above adjacent grade. The entirety ofthe tower would be painted “bisque” an off-white color that matches the color of the church buildingon the property. The color is depicted in the photo simulations provided by the applicant (AttachmentC). The uppermost panel features the Center for Spiritual Living’s motif, a star-like burst, that wouldslightly protrude from the face of the stucco-coated panel, creating a subtle visual cue at the top ofthe tower. It would be painted the same color as the rest of the tower. The top of the tower would besecured with a fire-proof mesh material that would be painted to match the rest of the tower. Giventhe height of the tower, and the gentle angle of the top of the tower, the mesh enclosure would benearly impossible to see from most vantage points.



The square tower base enclosure features sloped 8-foot tall walls with a rock veneer thatcorresponds with other rock bases found on the property. Staff has included a condition of approvalthat the specific rock veneer intended to be used for the tower enclosure be provided for review priorto the issuance of building permits for the tower, if approved. Landscaping consisting of shrubs andgrasses, would be planted around the enclosure to further soften its appearance. Three new streettrees will also be planted to further mitigate the visual impact of the tower. The plans show three gumtrees for the public right-of-way. Condition of Approval #21 requires that the applicant coordinate withthe current City Arborist prior to planting the new trees.

Special Use and Development Permit (SUDP) FindingsAs noted earlier in this report, new wireless telecommunication facilities are required to obtainarchitectural design review approval as well as approval of an SUDP. The five required findings foran SUDP are set forth in CMC Section 16.306.040. They require that staff finds that the property isadequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development and that the streets thatserve the property are adequate in size and shape to support the traffic generated by the proposeduse. The remaining findings are not dissimilar to criteria found in CMC Section 16.300.060. Theyrequire that staff find that the project is compatible with surrounding land uses and will not negativelyimpact them. Additionally, they require that staff find that the project will not have impacts to theprivacy of surrounding properties and that it will not have negative impacts in terms of public healthand safety. Staff believes that the project meets all of the required SUDP findings.

Basis for Recommendation

The design of the proposed church tower satisfies the intent of the CMC’s regulations for wirelesstelecommunications facilities in that it has been designed to have the smallest visual impact.Although the tower will be new, camouflaging the wireless facility as a decorative church tower helpsthe facility to appear as an attractive tower structure that is typical of residential areas like the onesurrounding this site. The proposed tower design features a simple, yet creative and attractive,design that corresponds to the existing architecture on the site. Staff also finds that all of therequired SUDP findings can be made for the proposed project. Should the Architectural Commissionapprove the design of the proposed wireless facility, staff will issue approval of the SUDP request thefollowing day, and will send notice of the SUDP and architectural design review approval to propertyowners within a 300-foot radius of the subject property as required by the CMC.

CEQA REVIEW

The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(e) - Class 3 for new construction or conversion ofsmall structures in that the project consists of the construction of a new structure that is accessory toan existing use at the subject property, one where all public services and utilities are available.Approval of the proposed project would not result in the removal of mature trees located at theproperty and would not result in an increase in traffic to and from the site. Further, the project wouldnot result in impacts to biological or archeological resources, given the site’s location in a developedarea


Notice of this meeting was mailed to properties in the 300-foot radius of the subject property onSeptember 12, 2019. A copy of this report has been sent to the applicant, the project architect, and



other interested parties.

This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of the staff reportare available at the City Hall public counter, Alexander Hughes Community Center, Youth ActivityCenter, and City’s website.

Submitted by: Reviewed by:

Brad Johnson Christopher VeirsCommunity Development Director Principal Planner

Prepared by:

Nikola HladyAssociate Planner

Attachments:A - Draft ResolutionB - Site Plan, Elevations and DetailsC - Photo Simulations



RESOLUTION NO. 2019 -

A RESOLUTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN REVIEW #16-A09, REVIEW OF PROPOSED 63-FOOT TALL STEEPLE/BELL TOWER TO SERVE AS A CONCEALED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR VERIZON WIRELESS LOCATED AT 509 S. COLLEGE AVENUE. APPLICANT – SMARTLINK, LLC ON BEHALF OF VERIZON WIRELESS

WHEREAS, on October 13, 2019, the applicant filed a request for architectural and site plan review and Special Use and Development Permit (SUDP) approval for the construction of a new church steeple/bell tower that would serve as a concealed wireless telecommunications facility at the subject property, which is owned and used by a church; and WHEREAS, new commercial wireless telecommunications facilities located on private property require the approval of a Special Use and Development Permit pursuant to Claremont Municipal Code (CMC) Section 16.100.040.C as well as architectural and site plan review pursuant to CMC Section 16.100.040.I; and

WHEREAS, on September 12, 2019, a notice of public hearing regarding the Architectural Commission review of the design of the proposed addition was mailed to surrounding property owners and residents in the 300-foot radius of the subject site; and

WHEREAS, the Architectural Commission held a public hearing on September 25, 2019, at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the revised proposal were heard and said proposal was fully studied.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CLAREMONT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DOES

HEREBY RESOLVE:

Section A. The Architectural Commission has determined that the proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(e) - Class 3 for new construction or conversion of small structures in that the project consists of the construction of a new structure that is accessory to an existing use at the subject property, one where all public services and utilities are available. Approval of the proposed project would not result in the removal of mature trees located at the property and would not result in an increase in traffic to and from the site. Further, the project would not result in impacts to biological or archeological resources, given the site’s location in a developed area.

Section B. The Architectural Commission finds that the review criteria of Section 16.300.060.A of the Claremont Municipal Code can be met in regard to the above-described project as follows:

1. Conformity with Development Standards – The steeple/bell tower and concealed

wireless facility complies with the applicable development standards of the Residential Single Family (RS 8,000) in which it is located and with the applicable development standards listed in Claremont Municipal Code (CMC) Section 16.100.040 – Commercial Antennas and Wireless Telecommunication Facilities.

natienza

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT A

Architectural Commission Resolution No. 2019 - Page 2

a. Setbacks: The project will meet all setback requirements of the RS 8,000 zoning district and of CMC Section 16.100.040.E in that the new tower would have the following setback distances.

i. Northern property line – 81-feet ii. Southern property line – 49.56-feet iii. Western property line – 354-feet iv. Eastern property line – 124.5-feet

b. Lot Coverage: The project complies with the lot coverage requirements for the RS 8,000 zoning district.

c. Floor Area: As an unmanned wireless facility, the project does not add floor area to the property.

d. Parking: One parking space for use by a wireless facility technician has been identified in the church’s existing parking lot. There is an existing surplus of parking at the site, allowing the applicant to allocate one parking space for use by the facility.

e. Building Height: Pursuant to CMC Section 16.100.040.E.2, the allowable

height for a new ground-mounted wireless telecommunication facility may be determined on a site-by-site basis by the Community Development Director. The steeple tower height of 63-feet is determined to be appropriate for the subject site when taking into account the height of surrounding structures as well as on- and off-site trees. A survey of the subject site shows the height of the existing large church building to be 27-feet tall. Additionally, the subject property features a number of large mature trees, as do surrounding properties, making the scale of the proposed tower appropriate when taken in relation to the trees. Further, the 63-foot height of the tower is consistent with the height of other church towers within the City, so it will not give the impression of excessive height, especially on this large (2.7 acre) church property. Finally, the applicant has indicated that the 63-foot tower height is required in order for the facility to effectively enhance cellular service in the vicinity of the site by filling an existing weak area of coverage.

2. General Plan Consistency – The proposed tower and wireless telecommunications facility are consistent with the following goals/policies of the Claremont General Plan:

a. Protect neighborhoods from impacts from non-residential development (Policy 2-2.4); in that the project features a well-considered design for the steeple tower wireless facility that effectively conceals the wireless equipment and also takes cues from the existing architecture found at the site. In doing so, the project avoids the potential for visual blight associated with unconcealed wireless facility. Additionally, the design of the tower will result in a structure that is compatible with the rest of the site and will not disrupt the residential feel of the neighborhood.

b. Accommodate a range of land uses that meet the economic, environmental, educational, and social needs of the City while remaining sensitive to the


community’s residential character (Goal 2-3) and Require that new construction, additions, renovations, and infill developments be sensitive to neighborhood context and building forms and scale (Policy 2-11.3); in that the project accommodates the City’s need for improved cellular and data service, while employing a design that is sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood context and will avoid visual blight resulting from a non-concealed type of wireless facility.

c. Insist on excellence in architectural design of new construction in the City (Goal 2-5); in that the project features a well-considered design that takes cues from existing architecture present at the site in order to both be compatible with the site and neighborhood context and effectively conceal the wireless equipment within a decorative church tower.

3. Compatibility of Form with Surrounding Development – The proposed

steeple/bell tower and concealed wireless facility have been designed to ensure compatibility of form with the surrounding development on the church site, in that its design takes cues from the architecture of the existing church buildings. Steeple and bell towers are typical structures found at a church property. The height of the subject tower is not only consistent with what is typical of a church property, but is also consistent with other similar towers found on other church properties in the city. The tower’s design not only effectively conceals the tower’s wireless equipment, it also allows the tower to blend in with the rest of the site. By avoiding the visual blight and industrial look that is often associated with wireless facilities, the proposed design avoids disruption of the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood.

4. Compatibility of Quality with Surrounding Development – The proposed project will employ materials and finishes that are consistent with the architecture on the site, both in terms of appearance, quality, and color.

5. Internal Consistency of Design – All four elevations of the tower feature the same architectural details, including key details such as the angled steel cross beams, off-white “bisque” paint color, and subtle “burst” motif at the top of the tower. These elements also help the tower relate to the rest of the structures at the site.

6. Privacy – As an unmanned wireless facility, the structure is not anticipated to have impacts on adjacent residential properties in terms of privacy.

7. Internal Circulation - The church tower and wireless facility is located appropriately on the site, in a grassy area just west of the parking lot near the front of the site. The siting of the tower allows it to maintain sufficient distances from adjacent residential properties and also allows for it to be screened by existing vegetation and structures when viewed from many angles around the subject site. Further, the location of the tower will not interfere with the regular use of the church property nor will it interfere with existing trees on the site.

8. Sustainability - The project will be required to meet all applicable sustainability codes and guidelines adopted by the City and the State’s new green building code

9. Tree Preservation – The project does not entail the removal of any trees on the property. Furthermore, the applicant has coordinated with the City Arborist and will plant three new street trees in the property’s College Avenue right-of-way.


10. Light and Air – While tall, the proposed tower is narrow at 11’-4” by 11’-10” and located at least 50 feet from adjacent properties. As such, it is not anticipated that the tower will impinge on neighbor’s existing access to light or use of prevailing winds for natural ventilation.

11. Environmental Protections – The proposed development has been reviewed pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and meets the environmental standards of the Claremont Municipal Code Chapter 16.154. The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(e) – Class 3 for new construction of small structures, in that the project consists of the construction of a new structure that is accessory to the existing church use at the property, which is one where all public services and utilities are available. The proposed project will not result in a change of use at the property, will not result in removal of mature trees on the property, and will not result in an increase in traffic to and from the site. Further, it can be concluded that the project will not result in impacts to biological or archeological resources, given the site’s location in an urbanized developed area.

12. Health and Safety – Due to the approved design of the tower and wireless facility, which ensures consistency with the other structures on the property, the tower will not have an appearance that is detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. Rather, once constructed, the tower will have the appearance of a church structure that has long existed at the subject site and will not disrupt the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood.

Section C. The Architectural Commission finds that the required findings of Section

16.100.040.D of the Claremont Municipal Code for wireless telecommunication facilities can be met in regard to the above-described project as follows:

1. The subject site, having a total size of 118,957 square feet, or approximately 2.7

acres, allows for adequate space on the site to locate the wireless telecommunications facility without conflicting with existing buildings, or reducing required parking, or landscaping. The steeple tower and concealed wireless facility will be located in an existing grassy area to the east of the existing church building and to the west of an existing parking lot. The location of the tower was chosen so as to avoid impacts to any existing trees on the site. Finally, there exists surplus of parking at the large property, allowing for one parking space to be allocated for use by a Verizon Wireless technician who may need to perform regular maintenance on the facility.

2. As an unmanned wireless facility designed to have the appearance of a church steeple, the structure will not adversely impact the use of the church property and its buildings, nor will it adversely impact the surrounding neighborhood. Given that it has been designed to be consistent with the architectural design of the existing buildings on the site, the structure will be architecturally compatible with the rest of the property. Further, its location in an existing grass area, and its small building footprint of 324-square feet, will not result in adverse impacts or disruptions to the operation of the church. With respects to the surrounding neighborhood, the design of the structure and its location will ensure that the structure, which is visible from adjacent properties, will not have adverse impacts, given that the tower’s antennas will be concealed behind a Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) with a stucco finish at the top of the


tower, avoiding the visual blight and industrial character associated with these types of facilities.

3. The proposal for the steeple/bell tower and wireless facility has been reviewed by Planning Division staff to ensure compliance with the requirements of CMC Sections 16.100.040.E-K. The approved plans depict compliance with these requirements.

Section D. The Architectural Commission hereby approves Architectural and Site Plan Review #19-A06 based on the review criteria as outlined in Sections A and B above, subject to the following conditions of approval:

1. This approval is for a new church steeple/bell tower that will serve as a concealed wireless telecommunications facility, equipment enclosure, and trenching, as depicted on the approved plans. The following equipment has been approved to be located within the tower structure: twelve (12), eight-foot tall panel antennas, twelve (12) RRU’s, one (1) microwave dish, and three (3) ray-cap surge protectors. The tower structure is approved to have a maximum height of 63-feet, with two GPS antennas projecting an additional foot above the tallest point of the structure. The approved setback distances are as follows:

i. Northern property line – 81-feet ii. Southern property line – 49.56-feet iii. Western property line – 354-feet iv. Eastern property line – 124.5-feet

2. The applicant shall submit, within five days of this approval, a check for $75 to file a

Notice of Exemption (NOE) with the Los Angeles County Clerk, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The check shall be made payable to the Los Angeles County Clerk.

3. The applicant shall construct the tower structure and install the approved antennas per

plan, and they shall become operational within two years from the date of the approval letter. If building permits are not issued within this time period or a time extension granted, this approval shall automatically expire without further City action.

4. Other than the approved improvements, no conduit, wires, cables, and/or other similar

means of connecting the panels to the BTS and/or other electronic equipment cabinets shall be placed on the subject site without prior review and approval by the Planning and Building Divisions.

5. Additional details, including a material sample of the enclosure’s exterior brick veneer

shall be provided to Planning Division staff when building plans for the tower are submitted for plan check in order to ensure that the approved stone veneer appropriately match the existing rock found at the site.

6. A copy of the applicant’s lease with the property owner shall be submitted to the City

prior to issuance of a building permit for the facility. If the lease is extended or terminated, notice and evidence thereof shall be provided to the Community Development Director. Upon termination or expiration of the lease, the use permit for the facility shall become null and void and the facility removed within 90 days.


7. No advertising, signs, or lighting shall be incorporated or attached to the antennas or

equipment building, except as required by the City’s Building Division or Federal regulations.

8. The applicant shall submit to the City certification of continued use of the approved facility on an annual basis at the time of business license renewal for as long as the facility remains in operation. The certification shall indicate that the facility is operating as approved and that the facility complies with the most current Federal Communications Commission (FCC) safety standards. Facilities that are no longer in operation shall be removed within 90 days after the date of discontinuation of use. If no annual certification is provided, the Special Use & Development Permit for the facility may be revoked by the Community Development Director. Prior to revoking a permit, the Director shall provide the owners of record written notice of their failure to provide the annual certification and an opportunity for a hearing.

9. Notice of any change in ownership of the facility shall be provided in writing to the City.

10. Within 90 days of commencement of operations, the applicant shall provide a

preliminary report and field report prepared by a qualified engineer that shows the operation of the facility is in conformance with the standards established by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) for safe human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency radiation (RFR).

11. When submitting plans for plan check, the applicant shall provide a report signed by a

licensed professional engineer specializing in structural engineering containing documentation that the structure is consistent with all applicable building codes, and a description of the support structure’s capacity, including the number of antenna array it can accommodate and the precise point at which the antenna array shall be mounted.

12. Any future modifications to the facility, such as the addition of panel, whip, dish,

omnidirectional, GPS, or test antennas shall be subject to review and approval by the City.

13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall:

a. Ascertain and comply with all requirements of the City’s Building and Engineering Divisions, including the submittal of complete architectural, electrical, mechanical, and structural plans duly wet stamped and signed by a licensed architect or engineer. The construction documents submitted for plan check shall be in substantial conformance with those approved by Planning Division staff.

b. Obtain an on-site improvement permit from the Engineering Division. Pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. Submit a refundable deposit to cover 100% of the estimated cost items.


c. Obtain an off-site improvement permit from the Engineering Division. Pay all applicable plan check and permit fees. Submit a refundable deposit to cover 100% of the estimated cost items.

d. Pay all applicable permit and development fees including, but not limited to, fire facility, plan check fees, and outstanding development review fees, as established by City ordinances and resolutions.

c. Pay any/all outstanding review fees related to the approval of these files (File #16–A09 & File #16–SUDP11).

14. If, as a result of the improvements, existing landscaping is damaged, the applicant is

required to replace it with in kind replacement landscaping.

15. Prior to issuance of any grading and/or on-site improvement permit, the applicant shall:

a. Submit a stamped and signed site plan, by a registered engineer or licensed architect. Such plan shall:

i. Delineate all proposed improvements ii. Include details and information demonstrating where the two new area

drains outlet. iii. Indicate existing drainage patters on the site plan. iv. Indicate that building addition areas will drain away from the structure to

approved drainage. v. Include the square footage of all new hardscape areas. vi. Delineate proposed grading topography overlaid on the originally

approved grading topography to facilitate plan check. vii. Delineate finished floor elevations. viii. Delineate spot elevations in relation to the home along the addition to

surface drainage proving 2 percent slope for five feet minimum and the direction of the surface drainage.

ix. Delineate the location of all trees and tree canopies. . x. Show any utility boxes found on the property. If relocation is required,

the applicant shall make adequate arrangements with applicable utility companies.

xi. Show summary of earthwork volumes. xii. List all applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction of

site improvements; demonstrating compliance with any applicable NPDES permit requirements and location of the trees proposed to be retained on the site, and specify/delineate the fencing and other protective measures to be installed prior to grading activities. Said protective measures shall be observed during grading and construction activities associated with the project.

xiii. Denote the underground location of various utilities to serve the site. This project is exempt from placing existing overhead utilities underground in accordance with Chapter 16.151.40 of the Claremont Municipal Code. All new utilities shall be placed underground.


xiv. Be in compliance with any applicable NPDES permit requirements subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. The developer shall work with the City’s NPDES consultant (at the applicant’s expense) to ensure compliance with all applicable NPDES requirements.

16. The applicant shall:

a. Maximize the percentage of pervious surfaces to allow percolation of storm water into the ground. b. Minimize the quantity of storm water directed to impervious surfaces and the City’s municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4). c. Direct roof-runoff to landscaped areas. d. Avoid discharging site drainage through underground pipes or any other conveyance to the City’s MS4.

17. During grading and construction operations, the applicant shall:

a. Implement best available control measures (BACMs) to minimize nuisance levels of construction activity emissions such as dust, emissions, and off-site impacts. BACMs shall include but are not limited to the following:

i. Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. ii. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. iii. Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging

areas. iv. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible

dirt deposition on any public roadway. v. Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or dusty

material. vi. Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. vii. Hydro-seed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain

inactive for more than 96 hours after clearing is completed. viii. Require 90-day low-NOx tune-ups for off-road equipment. ix. Limit allowable idling to five minutes for trucks and heavy equipment. x. Encourage carpooling for construction workers. xi. Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. xii. Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. xiii. Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. xiv. Wash or sweep access points daily. xv. Encourage receipt of material during non-peak traffic hours. xvi. Sandbag construction sites for erosion control.

18. Ensure the following measures are honored during all construction-related activities for

the project:

a. The hours of construction operation are limited to the hours of 7 am through 8 pm, Monday to Saturday. No construction activity is allowed on Sundays and Federal holidays.

b. All construction equipment shall use properly operating mufflers.


19. If, as a result of the operation of the subject facility, existing or future residential properties near the site experience any interference difficulties with electronic equipment (such as radios, televisions, telephones, or home computers), the applicant shall be solely and fully responsible to correct any and all problems pursuant to FCC requirements.

20. All graffiti and other forms of vandalism on the structure shall be promptly removed

and/or repaired within 24 hours.

21. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Arborist regarding the planting of three City street trees along the subject property’s College Avenue right-of-way. The three new trees shall be planted prior to the completion of construction of the tower.

22. Noncompliance with any condition of this approval shall constitute a violation of the

City’s Municipal Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the Claremont Municipal Code and/or the administrative fines program of Chapter 1.14 of the Municipal Code.

23. To ensure compliance with the conditions of this Special Use and Development Permit, a

final inspection is required from the Planning Division upon completion of construction and all improvements. The applicant shall contact the Planning Division to schedule an appointment for such an inspection.

24. The applicant/owner, by utilizing the benefits of this approval, shall thereby agree to

defend at its sole expense any action against the City, its agents, officers, and employees because of the issues of such approval. In addition, the applicant/owner shall reimburse the City et al for any court costs and attorney fees which the City et al may be required to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant/owner of its obligation hereunder.

Section E. The Architectural Commission Chair shall sign this resolution and the Commission’s secretary shall attest to the adoption thereof.

Passed, approved, and adopted this 25th day of September, 2019.

_____________________________________

Architectural Commission Chair

ATTEST: _______________________________ Architectural Commission Secretary

AD

DR

ES

S:

OW

NE

R:

NA

ME

:

AR

RO

W H

ILL

50

9 S

. C

OL

LE

GE

A

VE

NU

E

CL

AR

EM

ON

T, C

A 9

17

11

T-1

TIT

LE

S

HE

ET

PR

OJE

CT

D

ES

CR

IP

TIO

N

A&

E V

EN

DO

R:

A&

E C

OO

RD

IN

AT

OR

:

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S S

IG

NA

TU

RE

B

LO

CK

DIS

CIP

LIN

E:

SIG

NA

TU

RE

:D

AT

E:

RE

:

RE

V

EN

DO

R:

UT

IL

IT

Y V

EN

DO

R:

RF

:

EE

:

CE

:

CO

DE

C

OM

PL

IA

NC

E

TH

IS

P

RO

JE

CT

IS

A

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S U

NM

AN

NE

D T

EL

EC

OM

MU

NIC

AT

IO

N W

IR

EL

ES

S

FA

CIL

IT

Y. IT

W

IL

L C

ON

SIS

T O

F T

HE

F

OL

LO

WIN

G:

·N

EW

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S 1

8'-0

" x 1

8'-0

" L

EA

SE

A

RE

A

·IN

ST

AL

L 6

0'-0

" T

AL

L A

NT

EN

NA

T

OW

ER

·IN

ST

AL

L (1

2) P

AN

EL

A

NT

EN

NA

S (4

P

ER

S

EC

TO

R)

·IN

ST

AL

L (3

) D

UA

L M

OU

NT

B

RA

CK

ET

S (1

P

ER

S

EC

TO

R)

·IN

ST

AL

L (1

2) R

RU

'S

(4

P

ER

S

EC

TO

R)

·IN

ST

AL

L (3

) S

UR

GE

S

UP

PR

ES

SO

R

·IN

ST

AL

L (1

) 2

'Ø

M

IC

RO

WA

VE

D

IS

H

·IN

ST

AL

L (1

) 1

5K

W 5

4 G

AL

LO

N S

TA

ND

-B

Y G

EN

ER

AT

OR

·IN

ST

AL

L (2

) O

UT

DO

OR

M

CE

E

QU

IP

ME

NT

C

AB

IN

ET

S

·IN

ST

AL

L C

ON

NE

CT

IO

N A

S R

EQ

UIR

ED

F

OR

P

OW

ER

A

ND

T

EL

CO

S

ER

VIC

ES

DR

IV

IN

G D

IR

EC

TIO

NS

PR

OP

ER

TY

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N:

ST

AR

T:

VE

RIZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S O

FF

ICE

1.H

EA

D S

OU

TH

EA

ST

TO

WA

RD

SA

ND

CA

NY

ON

SID

E P

AT

H2.

CO

NT

INU

E O

NT

O W

AT

ER

WO

RK

S W

AY

3.T

UR

N R

IGH

T O

NT

O D

ISC

OV

ER

Y4.

TU

RN

LE

FT

AT

TH

E 1S

T C

RO

SS

ST

RE

ET

ON

TO

BA

RR

AN

CA

PK

WY

5.T

UR

N R

IGH

T A

T T

HE

2ND

CR

OS

S S

TR

EE

T O

NT

O P

AC

IFIC

A6.

TU

RN

RIG

HT

ON

TO

TH

E S

TA

TE

HIG

HW

AY

133 N R

AM

P7.

ME

RG

E O

NT

O C

A-133 N

(PA

RT

IAL

TO

LL

RO

AD

)8.

ME

RG

E O

NT

O C

A-241 N

(TO

LL

RO

AD

)9.

US

E T

HE

RIG

HT

2 LA

NE

S T

O T

AK

E E

XIT

39A T

O M

ER

GE

ON

TO

CA

-91 E T

OW

AR

DR

IVE

RS

IDE

(PA

RT

IAL

TO

LL

RO

AD

10.T

AK

E E

XIT

12A F

OR

RIV

ER

SID

E D

R/P

EY

TO

N D

R T

OW

AR

D C

A-60 E

11.T

UR

N R

IGH

T O

NT

O R

IVE

RS

IDE

DR

(SIG

NS

FO

R R

IVE

RS

IDE

DR

IVE

12.T

UR

N L

EF

T O

NT

O S

TO

WN

E A

VE

13.T

UR

N R

IGH

T M

ER

GE

ON

TO

I-10 E14.

ME

RG

E O

NT

O I-10 E

15.T

AK

E E

XIT

47 FO

R IN

DIA

N H

ILL

S B

LV

D T

OW

AR

D C

LA

RE

MO

NT

16.T

UR

N L

EF

T O

NT

O S

IND

IAN

HIL

LS

BL

VD

17.T

UR

N R

IGH

T O

NT

O W

SA

N JO

SE

AV

E18.

TU

RN

LE

FT

ON

TO

S C

OL

LE

GE

AV

E (D

ES

TIN

AT

ION

WIL

L O

N T

HE

LE

FT

)

VIC

IN

IT

Y M

AP

SH

EE

TD

ES

CR

IP

TIO

NR

EV

12

GE

NE

RA

L C

ON

TR

AC

TO

R N

OT

ES

ZO

NIN

G D

RA

WIN

GS

DO

N

OT

S

CA

LE

D

RA

WIN

GS

CO

NT

RA

CT

OR

S

HA

LL

V

ER

IF

Y A

LL

P

LA

NS

A

ND

E

XIS

TIN

G D

IM

EN

SIO

NS

A

ND

C

ON

DIT

IO

NS

O

N T

HE

JO

B

SIT

E A

ND

S

HA

LL

IM

ME

DIA

TE

LY

N

OT

IF

Y T

HE

A

RC

HIT

EC

T IN

W

RIT

IN

G O

F A

NY

D

IS

CR

EP

AN

CIE

S B

EF

OR

E

PR

OC

EE

DIN

G W

IT

H T

HE

W

OR

K O

R B

E R

ES

PO

NS

IB

LE

F

OR

T

HE

S

AM

E.

AS

SE

SS

OR

'S

P

AR

CE

L N

UM

BE

R

CU

RR

EN

T Z

ON

IN

G:

TY

PE

O

F C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N:

AR

EA

O

F C

ON

ST

RU

CT

IO

N:

V

18

'-0

" X

1

8'-0

" =

3

24

S

.F

.

AP

N:

R-3-10

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

OC

CU

PA

NC

Y:

B

AP

PL

IC

AN

T/L

ES

SE

E

15

50

5 S

AN

D C

AN

YO

N A

VE

NU

E, D

1

IR

VIN

E, C

A 9

26

18

OF

FIC

E: (9

49

) 2

86

-7

00

0

AP

PL

IC

AN

T'S

R

EP

RE

SE

NT

AT

IV

E

PR

OP

ER

TY

O

WN

ER

:

PR

OJE

CT

S

UM

MA

RY

·2

01

3 C

AL

IF

OR

NIA

E

NE

RG

Y C

OD

E

·2

01

3 C

AL

IF

OR

NIA

B

UIL

DIN

G C

OD

E

·2

01

3 C

AL

IF

OR

NIA

E

LE

CT

RIC

AL

C

OD

E

·2

01

3 C

AL

IF

OR

NIA

F

IR

E C

OD

E

·2

01

3 C

AL

IF

OR

NIA

G

RE

EN

B

UIL

DIN

G C

OD

E

·2

01

3 C

AL

IF

OR

NIA

M

EC

HA

NIC

AL

C

OD

E

·2

01

3 C

AL

IF

OR

NIA

P

LU

MB

IN

G C

OD

E

·C

IT

Y O

F C

LA

RE

MO

NT

R

EG

UL

AT

IO

NS

A

ND

DE

SIG

N S

TA

ND

AR

DS

F

OR

C

OM

ME

RC

IA

L

AN

TE

NN

A A

ND

W

IR

EL

ES

S C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

IO

N

FA

CIL

IT

IE

S

PR

OJE

CT

T

EA

M

SU

RV

EY

OR

:

UT

IL

IT

Y C

OO

RD

IN

AT

OR

:

PL

AN

NIN

GS

IT

E A

CQ

UIS

IT

IO

N

PR

OF

ES

SIO

NA

L E

NG

IN

EE

R:

NO

RT

H

TE

K S

YS

TE

M

10

0 B

AY

VIE

W C

IR

CL

E

NE

WP

OR

T B

EA

CH

, C

A 9

26

60

CO

NT

AC

T: M

AR

CIE

H

AR

T

PH

ON

E: (9

09

) 6

38

-3

36

0

ma

rcie

.h

art@

extte

ksyste

ms.co

m

IN

FIN

IG

Y E

NG

IN

EE

RIN

G

26

45

5 R

AN

CH

O P

AR

KW

AY

S

.

LA

KE

F

OR

ES

T, C

A 9

26

30

DA

NIE

L C

ON

NE

LL

94

9-3

06

-4

64

4

dco

nn

ell@

in

fin

ig

y.co

m

FL

OY

D S

UR

VE

YIN

G

34

00

6 G

AL

LE

RO

N S

TR

EE

T

TE

ME

CU

LA

, C

A 9

25

92

CO

NT

AC

T: D

AV

ID

F

LO

YD

PH

ON

E: (9

49

) 2

00

-0

62

6

fsi@

flo

yd

su

rve

yin

g.co

m

SM

AR

TL

IN

K, L

LC

18

40

1 V

ON

K

AR

MA

N A

VE

, S

UIT

E 4

00

IR

VIN

E, C

A 9

26

12

DA

NE

EN

W

IL

DE

R

(7

14

) 9

36

-1

03

0

da

ne

en

.w

ild

er@

sm

artlin

kllc.co

m

SM

AR

TL

IN

K, L

LC

18

40

1 V

ON

K

AR

MA

N A

VE

, S

UIT

E 4

00

IR

VIN

E, C

A 9

26

12

JIM

R

OG

ER

S

(9

49

)2

95

-9

03

1

ja

me

s.ro

ge

rs@

sm

artlin

kllc.co

m

NOTE: THE ORIGINAL SIZE OF THIS PLAN IS 24" X 36". SCALE RATIO IS NOT VALID FOR REDUCED OR ENLARGED SHEET SIZES

SH

EE

T T

IT

LE

:

IS

SU

E S

TA

TU

S

PR

OP

RIE

TA

RY

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

TH

E IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N C

ON

TA

IN

ED

IN

T

HIS

S

ET

O

F

DR

AW

IN

GS

IS

P

RO

PR

IE

TA

RY

&

C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L T

O

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

AN

Y U

SE

O

R D

IS

CLO

SU

RE

O

TH

ER

T

HA

N A

S IT

R

ELA

TE

S

TO

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

IS

S

TR

IC

TLY

P

RO

HIB

IT

ED

15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE, D1

IRVINE, CA 92618

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

AT

EB

Y

09

/1

9/1

8M

H

RE

V.

9

509 S. COLLEGE AVE

CLAREMONT, CA 91711

ARROW HILL

10

0%

Z

ON

IN

G

INFIN

IGY

FROM

ZERO

IOT

NFI

IN

GY

the solutions are endless

JOB #496-017

LA

ND

SC

AP

E R

EV

IS

IO

N

11

/0

7/1

8M

H1

0

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

TO

WE

R D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

01

/1

1/1

9M

H1

1

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

SC

I D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

04

/0

1/1

9M

H1

2R

EV

IS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

OV

ER

AL

L H

EIG

HT

=

6

3'-0

"

MT

X 4

5 / B

SC

1

7

MC

E

2

AD

A C

OM

PL

IA

NC

E:

FA

CIL

IT

Y IS

U

NM

AN

NE

D A

ND

N

OT

F

OR

H

UM

AN

H

AB

IT

AT

IO

N.

MA

CH

IN

ER

Y S

PA

CE

S A

RE

E

XE

MP

T F

RO

M A

CC

ES

SIB

IL

IT

Y

RE

QU

IR

EM

EN

TS

P

ER

T

HE

C

BC

S

EC

TIO

N 1

1B

-2

03

.5

.

TR

AN

SP

OR

T:

Callbefore you dig.below.

Know what's

R

TO

O

BT

AIN

LO

CA

TIO

N O

F P

AR

TIC

IP

AN

TS

UN

DE

RG

RO

UN

D F

AC

ILIT

IE

S B

EF

OR

E

YO

U D

IG

IN

C

ALIF

OR

NIA

(S

OU

TH

), C

ALL

DIG

A

LE

RT

TO

LL F

RE

E: 1-800-227-2600 O

R

ww

w.digalert.org

CA

LIF

OR

NIA

S

TA

TU

TE

RE

QU

IR

ES

M

IN

O

F 2

WO

RK

IN

G D

AY

S N

OT

IC

E

BE

FO

RE

Y

OU

E

XC

AV

AT

E

T-1

TIT

LE

S

HE

ET

LS

-2

VZ

W D

WG

T

EM

PLA

TE

T

-1 V

1.0 12/28/2015

LS

-1

SIT

E S

UR

VE

Y G

EN

ER

AL

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

A-0

SIT

E P

LA

N &

E

NL

AR

GE

D S

IT

E P

LA

N

CL

AR

EM

ON

T

8T

H S

T

AR

RO

W H

WY

SA

N B

ER

NA

RD

IN

O A

VE

M

I

L

L

S

A

V

E

SAN ANTONIO AVE

INDIAN HILL BLVD

COLLEGE AVE

CENTRAL AVE

SIT

E

CL

AR

EM

ON

T C

HU

RC

H O

F R

EL

IG

IO

US

S

CIE

NC

E

50

9 S

. C

OL

LE

GE

A

VE

NU

E

CL

AR

EM

ON

T, C

A 9

17

11

ED

G

RA

FF

SIT

E N

AM

E:

SIT

E A

DD

RE

SS

:

JU

RIS

DIC

TIO

N: T

HE

C

IT

Y O

F C

LA

RE

MO

NT

50

9 S

. C

OL

LE

GE

A

VE

NU

E

CL

AR

EM

ON

T, C

A 9

17

11

AR

RO

W H

IL

L

8315-008-051

A-1

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

&

A

NT

EN

NA

L

AY

OU

TS

A-2

SO

UT

H A

ND

E

AS

T E

LE

VA

TIO

NS

PH

ON

E:

(9

09

) 9

38

-9

67

6

SM

AR

TL

IN

K, L

LC

18

40

1 V

ON

K

AR

MA

N A

VE

, S

UIT

E 4

00

IR

VIN

E, C

A 9

26

12

JIM

R

OG

ER

S

(9

49

)2

95

-9

03

1

ja

me

s.ro

ge

rs@

sm

artlin

kllc.co

m

A-3

NO

RT

H A

ND

W

ES

T E

LE

VA

TIO

NS

SIT

E S

UR

VE

Y G

EN

ER

AL

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

A-4

DE

TA

IL

S

12

12

12

12

12

12

L-1

PR

EL

IM

IN

AR

Y L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

5

natienza

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT B

S 8

9°3

4'1

3" W

5

03

.6

3'

N 00°17'45" W 312.43'

N 8

9°4

1'4

3" E

2

73

.7

2'

S 00°16'46" E 159.34'

N 8

9°4

1'4

3" E

1

18

.9

2'

S 00°16'46" E 128.03'

N 8

9°4

1'4

3" E

11

1.1

6'

S 00°16'46" E

24.00'

SIT

E P

LA

N


SH

EE

T T

IT

LE

:

IS

SU

E S

TA

TU

S

PR

OP

RIE

TA

RY

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

TH

E IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N C

ON

TA

IN

ED

IN

T

HIS

S

ET

O

F

DR

AW

IN

GS

IS

P

RO

PR

IE

TA

RY

&

C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L T

O

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

AN

Y U

SE

O

R D

IS

CLO

SU

RE

O

TH

ER

T

HA

N A

S IT

R

ELA

TE

S

TO

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

IS

S

TR

IC

TLY

P

RO

HIB

IT

ED


IRVINE, CA 92618

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

AT

EB

Y

09

/1

9/1

8M

H

RE

V.

9

509 S. COLLEGE AVE

CLAREMONT, CA 91711

ARROW HILL

10

0%

Z

ON

IN

G

INFIN

IGY

FROM

ZERO

IOT

NFI

IN

GY


JOB #496-017

LA

ND

SC

AP

E R

EV

IS

IO

N

11

/0

7/1

8M

H1

0

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

TO

WE

R D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

01

/1

1/1

9M

H1

1

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

SC

I D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

04

/0

1/1

9M

H1

2R

EV

IS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

A-0

2

1/2

" =

2

0'-0" (1

1x

17

)

SC

AL

E:

(O

R)

1" =

1

0'-0" (24x

36

)

5'

10

'0

SIT

E P

LA

N &

1

1/2

" =

6

0'-0

" (1

1x

17

)

SC

AL

E:

(O

R)

1" =

3

0'-0

" (24

x3

6)

30

'1

5'

30

'0

PR

OP

ER

TY

L

IN

E

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

P

L

PR

OP

ER

TY

L

IN

E

PROPERTY LINE

PR

OP

ER

TY

L

IN

E

(E

) B

UIL

DIN

G

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

E

NC

LO

SU

RE

A

ND

56

'-6

" T

AL

L A

NT

EN

NA

S T

OW

ER

2

-

(E

) R

ES

ID

EN

TIA

L B

UIL

DIN

G

(E

) C

HU

RC

H

BU

IL

DIN

G

PR

OP

ER

TY

L

IN

E

(E) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

PO

WE

R &

F

IB

ER

R

OU

TE

(±1

80

')

FR

OM

F

IB

ER

/P

OW

ER

U

TIL

IT

Y JO

IN

T

TR

EN

CH

T

O E

QU

IP

ME

NT

A

RE

A

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S P

OW

ER

RO

UT

E (±2

50

') F

RO

M P

OW

ER

P

.O

.C

. T

O

PO

WE

R IN

U

ND

ER

GR

OU

ND

B

OR

IN

G

(E

) U

TIL

IT

Y P

OL

E #

45

31

09

6E

,

WIT

H T

RA

NS

FO

RM

ER

,

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

PO

WE

R P

.O

.C

* P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

17

X3

0 M

MP

F

IB

ER

H

H A

T

PR

OP

ER

TY

L

IN

E

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S 1

2' W

ID

E

NO

N-E

XL

US

IV

E P

AT

H

OF

A

CC

ES

S

(E

) S

IT

E A

CC

ES

S

(E

) P

AR

KIN

G A

RE

A

(E

) P

AR

KIN

G A

RE

A

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

NO

N-E

XC

LU

SIV

E P

AR

KIN

G S

TA

LL

2

A-1

1

A-1

(E

) C

ON

C.

SID

EW

AL

K

(E

) G

RA

SS

A

RE

A

PR

OP

OS

ED

L

AN

DS

CA

PIN

G

SE

E L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

(E

)

CH

UR

CH

BU

IL

DIN

G

(E

) B

UIL

DIN

G

(E

) P

AR

KIN

G A

RE

A

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

(1

) P

AR

KIN

G S

PA

CE

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S P

OW

ER

&

FIB

ER

T

RE

NC

H F

RO

M

FIB

ER

/P

OW

ER

JO

IN

T

CO

NN

EC

TIO

N (±1

80

')

(E

) T

RE

E, T

YP

.

(E

) C

HU

RC

H

BU

IL

DIN

G

(E

) C

HU

RC

H

BU

IL

DIN

G

EN

LA

RG

ED

S

IT

E P

LA

N

EN

LA

RG

ED

S

IT

E P

LA

N

EX

IS

TIN

G P

UB

LIC

UT

IL

IT

IE

S E

AS

EM

EN

T

(E

) C

ON

CR

ET

E C

UR

B

EX

IS

TIN

G M

ET

RO

PO

LIT

AN

WA

TE

R D

IS

TR

IC

T E

AS

EM

EN

T

(E) SIDEWALK

EX

IS

TIN

G 3

' T

AL

L W

AL

L

70

'

38

'

38

'

52

'

EX

IS

TIN

G B

EN

CH

*E

XT

EN

ET

T

O IN

ST

AL

L

2'X

3' M

MP

H

H A

T R

.O

.W

.

* U

TIL

IT

Y N

OT

E:

IF

F

IB

ER

P

RO

VID

ER

B

UIL

DS

1

ST

,

TH

EY

W

IL

L P

LA

CE

A

2

'X

3' M

MP

H

H A

T

TH

E P

/L

IN

T

HE

R

.O

.W

IF

V

ER

IZ

ON

B

UIL

DS

1

ST

, V

ER

IZ

ON

TO

P

LA

CE

A

1

7"X

30

" H

H A

T T

HE

P

/L

.

ED

IS

ON

C

AR

RIE

R S

OL

UT

IO

NS

(E

CS

)

TO

IN

ST

AL

L (±7

20

0') O

F A

DS

S F

IB

ER

OP

TIC

C

AB

LE

O

N E

XIS

TIN

G S

CE

OV

ER

HE

AD

F

AC

IL

IT

IE

S F

OR

M P

OL

E

#4

58

62

49

E T

O P

OL

E #

44

79

01

E,

RE

FE

R T

O E

CS

D

ES

IG

N

EX

IS

TIN

G U

TIL

IT

Y P

OL

E

#4

47

90

1E

, P

RO

PO

SE

D

VE

RIZ

ON

F

IB

ER

P

.O

.C

.

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

12

0/2

40

V M

ET

ER

P

ED

ES

TA

L

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S E

QU

IP

ME

NT

&

AN

TE

NN

A A

RE

A E

NC

LO

SU

RE

PR

OP

OS

ED

L

IV

E T

RE

ES

,

SE

E L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

2


SH

EE

T T

IT

LE

:

IS

SU

E S

TA

TU

S

PR

OP

RIE

TA

RY

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

TH

E IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N C

ON

TA

IN

ED

IN

T

HIS

S

ET

O

F

DR

AW

IN

GS

IS

P

RO

PR

IE

TA

RY

&

C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L T

O

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

AN

Y U

SE

O

R D

IS

CLO

SU

RE

O

TH

ER

T

HA

N A

S IT

R

ELA

TE

S

TO

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

IS

S

TR

IC

TLY

P

RO

HIB

IT

ED


IRVINE, CA 92618

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

AT

EB

Y

09

/1

9/1

8M

H

RE

V.

9

509 S. COLLEGE AVE

CLAREMONT, CA 91711

ARROW HILL

10

0%

Z

ON

IN

G

INFIN

IGY

FROM

ZERO

IOT

NFI

IN

GY


JOB #496-017

LA

ND

SC

AP

E R

EV

IS

IO

N

11

/0

7/1

8M

H1

0

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

TO

WE

R D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

01

/1

1/1

9M

H1

1

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

SC

I D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

04

/0

1/1

9M

H1

2R

EV

IS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

A-1

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

L

AY

OU

T

AN

TE

NN

A L

AY

OU

T

1

1/2

" =

1

'-0

" (2

4x

36

)

(O

R)

SC

AL

E:

1/4

" =

1

'-0

" (1

1x

17

)

01

'2

'

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

&

AN

TE

NN

A LA

YO

UT

S

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

8' A

NT

EN

NA

S, (4

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R,

(3

) S

EC

TO

RS

, T

OT

AL

O

F (1

2) A

NT

EN

NA

S

MO

UN

TE

D IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S R

RU

'S

, (4

) P

ER

SE

CT

OR

, (3

) S

EC

TO

RS

, T

OT

AL

O

F (1

2) R

RU

'S

,

MO

UN

TE

D IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

S

TR

UC

TU

RA

L S

TE

EL

6x6

x3

/8

" C

OL

UM

NS

(T

YP

. O

F 4

)

(A

BO

VE

)

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

OU

TD

OO

R M

CE

C

AB

IN

ET

, T

YP

. O

F 2

,

MO

UN

TE

D O

N C

ON

CR

ET

E P

AD

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

15

KW

5

4 G

AL

LO

N D

IE

SE

L S

TA

ND

-B

Y

GE

NE

RA

TO

R M

OU

NT

ED

O

N

CO

NC

RE

TE

P

AD

PR

OP

OS

ED

4

'W

.

CO

NC

. W

AL

KW

AY

LIN

E O

F T

OW

ER

A

BO

VE

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S 1

7"X

30

"

UN

DE

RG

RO

UN

D P

UL

L B

OX

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

P

AN

EL

S

CR

EE

N W

AL

L

TO

B

E S

TU

CC

O T

EX

TU

RE

C

OA

TE

D &

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

3

'X

3'

AC

CE

SS

H

AT

CH

IN

FL

OO

R B

EL

OW

PR

OP

OS

ED

8

' T

AL

L C

MU

W

AL

L W

/

ST

ON

E V

EN

EE

R T

O M

AT

CH

EX

IS

TIN

G C

HU

RC

H B

UIL

DIN

G

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

2'Ø

M

IC

RO

WA

VE

D

IS

H

MO

UN

TE

D IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

GP

S A

NT

EN

NA

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

SU

RG

E S

UP

PR

ES

SO

R, (1

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R,

(3

) S

EC

TO

RS

, T

OT

AL

O

F (3

) S

UR

GE

S

UP

PR

ES

SO

R

MO

UN

TE

D IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

T

OW

ER

M

ET

AL

GR

AT

E P

LA

TF

OR

M

OP

EN

R

OO

F

PR

OP

OS

ED

H

SS

8x8

x1

/2

S

TE

EL

CO

LU

MN

S U

P T

O 4

7'-6

" (T

YP

. O

F 4

)

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

TE

LC

O C

AB

IN

ET

, E

LE

CT

RIC

AL

PA

NE

L A

ND

W

OR

K L

IG

HT

MO

UN

TE

D O

N W

AL

L

EX

IS

TIN

G C

ON

CR

ET

E W

AL

KW

AY

EX

IS

TIN

G B

EN

CH

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S 4

'-0

" W

ID

E

ME

TA

L G

AT

E,

SE

E S

HE

ET

A

-4

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

SA

FE

TY

C

AG

ED

A

CC

ES

S L

AD

DE

R

PR

OP

OS

ED

' A

CC

ES

S

LA

DD

ER

B

EL

OW

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

B

RA

CIN

G A

BO

VE

1/2

" =

1

'-0

" (24

x3

6)

(O

R)

SC

AL

E:

1/4

" =

1

'-0

" (11

x1

7)

01'

2'

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S C

AB

LE

S

RO

UT

ED

V

ER

TIC

AL

LY

IN

SID

E C

AB

LE

CO

VE

R B

EH

IN

D A

CC

ES

S L

AD

DE

R

NO

TE

:

PR

OP

OS

ED

L

AN

DS

CA

PIN

G N

OT

S

HO

WN

FO

R C

LA

RIT

Y. S

EE

L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S C

AB

LE

R

OU

TE

(±1

00

') M

OU

NT

ED

T

O T

OW

ER

S

TR

UC

TU

RE

AB

OV

E T

HE

N B

EH

IN

D A

CC

ES

S L

AD

DE

R

PR

OP

OS

ED

6

0'-0

" T

AL

L T

OW

ER

2


SH

EE

T T

IT

LE

:

IS

SU

E S

TA

TU

S

PR

OP

RIE

TA

RY

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

TH

E IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N C

ON

TA

IN

ED

IN

T

HIS

S

ET

O

F

DR

AW

IN

GS

IS

P

RO

PR

IE

TA

RY

&

C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L T

O

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

AN

Y U

SE

O

R D

IS

CLO

SU

RE

O

TH

ER

T

HA

N A

S IT

R

ELA

TE

S

TO

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

IS

S

TR

IC

TLY

P

RO

HIB

IT

ED


IRVINE, CA 92618

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

AT

EB

Y

09

/1

9/1

8M

H

RE

V.

9

509 S. COLLEGE AVE

CLAREMONT, CA 91711

ARROW HILL

10

0%

Z

ON

IN

G

INFIN

IGY

FROM

ZERO

IOT

NFI

IN

GY


JOB #496-017

LA

ND

SC

AP

E R

EV

IS

IO

N

11

/0

7/1

8M

H1

0

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

TO

WE

R D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

01

/1

1/1

9M

H1

1

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

SC

I D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

04

/0

1/1

9M

H1

2R

EV

IS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

A-2

EA

ST

E

LE

VA

TIO

N

3/1

6" =

1

'-0" (2

4x

36)

(O

R)

SC

AL

E:

3/3

2" =

1

'-0" (11x

17

)

02'

4'

6'

SO

UT

H E

LE

VA

TIO

N

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S 8

' A

NT

EN

NA

S,

(4

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R, (3

) S

EC

TO

RS

, T

OT

AL

O

F (1

2)

AN

TE

NN

AS

M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

6

0'-0

" T

AL

L T

OW

ER

(E

) ±2

7' H

IG

H C

HU

RC

H

BU

IL

DIN

G (B

EY

ON

D)

EL

EV

. 0

'-0

" R

EF

.

FIN

IS

H G

RA

DE

TO

P O

F E

QU

IP

ME

NT

WA

LL

E

NC

LO

SU

RE

EL

EV

. 8

'-0

" A

GL

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

GP

S A

NT

EN

NA

PR

OP

OS

ED

6

0'-0

" T

AL

L T

OW

ER

(E

) ±2

7' H

IG

H

CH

UR

CH

B

UIL

DIN

G

PR

OP

OS

ED

8

' T

AL

L C

MU

W

AL

L W

/

ST

ON

E V

EN

EE

R T

O M

AT

CH

EX

IS

TIN

G C

HU

RC

H B

UIL

DIN

G

(E

) C

MU

W

AL

L

(B

EY

ON

D)

PR

OP

OS

ED

8

' T

AL

L C

MU

W

AL

L W

/

ST

ON

E V

EN

EE

R T

O M

AT

CH

EX

IS

TIN

G C

HU

RC

H B

UIL

DIN

G

1

3/1

6" =

1

'-0

" (2

4x

36

)

(O

R)

SC

AL

E:

3/3

2" =

1

'-0

" (1

1x

17

)

02

'4

'6

'

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S (1

) 2

'Ø

M

IC

RO

WA

VE

DIS

H M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S (1

) 2

'Ø

M

IC

RO

WA

VE

DIS

H M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

RR

U'S

, (4

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R, (3

) S

EC

TO

RS

,

TO

TA

L O

F (1

2) R

RU

'S

, M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E

(P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

S

TE

EL

F

RA

ME

T

OW

ER

LE

GS

A

ND

C

RO

SS

B

RA

CE

S T

O B

E

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

OU

TD

OO

R M

CE

E

QU

IP

ME

NT

C

AB

IN

ET

S

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D T

OW

ER

EL

EV

. 6

3'-0

" A

GL

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S M

ET

AL

P

LA

TF

OR

M

EL

EV

. 5

0'-6

" A

GL

(E

) T

RE

E, T

YP

.

CE

NT

ER

L

IN

E O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S A

NT

EN

NA

S

EL

EV

. 5

6'-0

" A

GL

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D T

OW

ER

EL

EV

. 6

3'-0

" A

GL

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S A

NT

EN

NA

S

EL

EV

. 6

0'-0

" A

GL

EL

EV

. 0

'-0

" R

EF

.

FIN

IS

H G

RA

DE

EL

EV

. 8

'-0

" A

GL

SO

UT

H A

ND

E

AS

T

ELE

VA

TIO

NS

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

ST

AN

D-B

Y G

EN

ER

AT

OR

(E

) ±4

' H

IG

H W

AL

L

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

P

AN

EL

TO

B

E S

TU

CC

O F

IN

IS

H &

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

CE

NT

ER

L

IN

E O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S M

IC

RO

WA

VE

D

IS

H

EL

EV

. T

.B

.D

.

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S M

ET

AL

P

LA

TF

OR

M

EL

EV

. 5

0'-6

" A

GL

CE

NT

ER

L

IN

E O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S M

IC

RO

WA

VE

D

IS

H

EL

EV

. T

.B

.D

.

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

L

OG

O

PE

R D

ET

AIL

7

/A

-4

PR

OP

OS

ED

S

TE

EL

F

RA

ME

T

OW

ER

LE

GS

A

ND

C

RO

SS

B

RA

CE

S T

O B

E

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

TO

P O

F E

QU

IP

ME

NT

WA

LL

E

NC

LO

SU

RE

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S C

AB

LE

S

RO

UT

ED

V

ER

TIC

AL

LY

IN

SID

E C

AB

LE

CO

VE

R B

EH

IN

D A

CC

ES

S L

AD

DE

R

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S C

AB

LE

S

RO

UT

ED

V

ER

TIC

AL

LY

IN

SID

E C

AB

LE

CO

VE

R B

EH

IN

D A

CC

ES

S L

AD

DE

R

PR

OP

OS

ED

L

IV

E B

US

HE

S,

SE

E L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

PR

OP

OS

ED

L

IV

E B

US

HE

S,

SE

E L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

AL

L P

RO

PO

SE

D F

RP

P

AN

EL

S T

O B

E S

TU

CC

O

TE

XT

UR

E C

OA

TE

D &

P

AIN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

AL

L P

RO

PO

SE

D F

RP

P

AN

EL

S T

O B

E S

TU

CC

O

TE

XT

UR

E C

OA

TE

D &

P

AIN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

GP

S A

NT

EN

NA

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

OU

TD

OO

R M

CE

E

QU

IP

ME

NT

C

AB

IN

ET

S

(E

) T

RE

ES

, T

YP

.

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

P

AN

EL

TO

B

E S

TU

CC

O F

IN

IS

H &

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

2


SH

EE

T T

IT

LE

:

IS

SU

E S

TA

TU

S

PR

OP

RIE

TA

RY

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

TH

E IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N C

ON

TA

IN

ED

IN

T

HIS

S

ET

O

F

DR

AW

IN

GS

IS

P

RO

PR

IE

TA

RY

&

C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L T

O

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

AN

Y U

SE

O

R D

IS

CLO

SU

RE

O

TH

ER

T

HA

N A

S IT

R

ELA

TE

S

TO

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

IS

S

TR

IC

TLY

P

RO

HIB

IT

ED


IRVINE, CA 92618

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

AT

EB

Y

09

/1

9/1

8M

H

RE

V.

9

509 S. COLLEGE AVE

CLAREMONT, CA 91711

ARROW HILL

10

0%

Z

ON

IN

G

INFIN

IGY

FROM

ZERO

IOT

NFI

IN

GY


JOB #496-017

LA

ND

SC

AP

E R

EV

IS

IO

N

11

/0

7/1

8M

H1

0

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

TO

WE

R D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

01

/1

1/1

9M

H1

1

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

SC

I D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

04

/0

1/1

9M

H1

2R

EV

IS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

A-3

WE

ST

E

LE

VA

TIO

N

3/1

6" =

1

'-0" (2

4x

36)

(O

R)

SC

AL

E:

3/3

2" =

1

'-0" (11x

17

)

02'

4'

6'

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

ST

AN

D-B

Y G

EN

ER

AT

OR

NO

RT

H E

LE

VA

TIO

N

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S 8

' A

NT

EN

NA

S,

(4

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R, (3

) S

EC

TO

RS

, T

OT

AL

O

F (1

2)

AN

TE

NN

AS

M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

6

0'-0

" T

AL

L T

OW

ER

CE

NT

ER

L

IN

E O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S A

NT

EN

NA

S

EL

EV

. 5

6'-0

" A

GL

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D T

OW

ER

EL

EV

. 6

3'-0

" A

GL

EL

EV

. 0

'-0

" R

EF

.

FIN

IS

H G

RA

DE

TO

P O

F E

QU

IP

ME

NT

WA

LL

E

NC

LO

SU

RE

EL

EV

. 8

'-0

" A

GL

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S G

PS

AN

TE

NN

A

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S 8

' A

NT

EN

NA

S,

(4

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R, (3

) S

EC

TO

RS

, T

OT

AL

O

F (1

2)

AN

TE

NN

AS

M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

RR

U'S

, (4

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R, (3

) S

EC

TO

RS

,

TO

TA

L O

F (1

2) R

RU

'S

, M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E

(P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

6

0'-0

" T

AL

L T

OW

ER

(E

) ±2

7' H

IG

H

CH

UR

CH

BU

IL

DIN

G

PR

OP

OS

ED

8

' T

AL

L C

MU

W

AL

L W

/

ST

ON

E V

EN

EE

R T

O M

AT

CH

EX

IS

TIN

G C

HU

RC

H B

UIL

DIN

G

(E

) T

RE

E, T

YP

.

PR

OP

OS

ED

8

' T

AL

L C

MU

W

AL

L W

/

ST

ON

E V

EN

EE

R T

O M

AT

CH

EX

IS

TIN

G C

HU

RC

H B

UIL

DIN

G

1

3/1

6" =

1

'-0

" (2

4x

36

)

(O

R)

SC

AL

E:

3/3

2" =

1

'-0

" (1

1x

17

)

02

'4

'6

'

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S (1

) 2

'Ø

M

IC

RO

WA

VE

DIS

H M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E (P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

RR

U'S

, (4

) P

ER

S

EC

TO

R, (3

) S

EC

TO

RS

,

TO

TA

L O

F (1

2) R

RU

'S

, M

OU

NT

ED

IN

SID

E

(P

) T

OW

ER

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

OU

TD

OO

R M

CE

E

QU

IP

ME

NT

C

AB

IN

ET

S

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S A

NT

EN

NA

S

EL

EV

. 6

0'-0

" A

GL

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

ST

AN

D-B

Y G

EN

ER

AT

OR

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

4'-0

" W

ID

E M

ET

AL

G

AT

E,

SE

E S

HE

ET

A

-4

(E

) T

RE

E, T

YP

CE

NT

ER

L

IN

E O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S A

NT

EN

NA

S

EL

EV

. 5

6'-0

" A

GL

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D T

OW

ER

EL

EV

. 6

3'-0

" A

GL

EL

EV

. 0

'-0

" R

EF

.

FIN

IS

H G

RA

DE

TO

P O

F E

QU

IP

ME

NT

WA

LL

E

NC

LO

SU

RE

EL

EV

. 8

'-0

" A

GL

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S A

NT

EN

NA

S

EL

EV

. 6

0'-0

" A

GL

(E

) ±1

0' H

IG

H T

RE

E,

TY

P

NO

RT

H A

ND

W

ES

T

ELE

VA

TIO

NS

(E

) ±4

' H

IG

H

WA

LL

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

S

CR

EE

N W

AL

L T

O B

E S

TU

CC

O F

IN

IS

H,

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

S

TE

EL

F

RA

ME

T

OW

ER

LE

GS

A

ND

C

RO

SS

B

RA

CE

S T

O B

E

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

P

AN

EL

T

O B

E S

TU

CC

O T

EX

TU

RE

CO

AT

ED

&

P

AIN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S M

ET

AL

P

LA

TF

OR

M

EL

EV

. 5

0'-6

" A

GL

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

S

CR

EE

N W

AL

L W

IT

H S

TU

CC

O F

IN

IS

H,

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

S

TE

EL

F

RA

ME

T

OW

ER

LE

GS

A

ND

C

RO

SS

B

RA

CE

S T

O B

E

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

P

AN

EL

T

O B

E

ST

UC

CO

F

IN

IS

H &

P

AIN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

TO

P O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S M

ET

AL

P

LA

TF

OR

M

EL

EV

. 5

0'-6

" A

GL

CE

NT

ER

L

IN

E O

F P

RO

PO

SE

D V

ER

IZ

ON

WIR

EL

ES

S M

IC

RO

WA

VE

D

IS

H

EL

EV

. T

.B

.D

.

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S

GP

S A

NT

EN

NA

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S C

AB

LE

S

RO

UT

ED

V

ER

TIC

AL

LY

IN

SID

E C

AB

LE

CO

VE

R B

EH

IN

D A

CC

ES

S L

AD

DE

R

PR

OP

OS

ED

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

EL

ES

S C

AB

LE

S

RO

UT

ED

V

ER

TIC

AL

LY

IN

SID

E C

AB

LE

CO

VE

R B

EH

IN

D A

CC

ES

S L

AD

DE

R

PR

OP

OS

ED

L

IV

E B

US

HE

S,

SE

E L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

PR

OP

OS

ED

L

IV

E B

US

HE

S,

SE

E L

AN

DS

CA

PE

P

LA

N

AL

L P

RO

PO

SE

D F

RP

P

AN

EL

S T

O B

E

ST

UC

CO

T

EX

TU

RE

C

OA

TE

D &

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

AL

L P

RO

PO

SE

D F

RP

P

AN

EL

S T

O B

E S

TU

CC

O

TE

XT

UR

E C

OA

TE

D &

P

AIN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"


SH

EE

T T

IT

LE

:

IS

SU

E S

TA

TU

S

PR

OP

RIE

TA

RY

IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N

TH

E IN

FO

RM

AT

IO

N C

ON

TA

IN

ED

IN

T

HIS

S

ET

O

F

DR

AW

IN

GS

IS

P

RO

PR

IE

TA

RY

&

C

ON

FID

EN

TIA

L T

O

VE

RIZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

AN

Y U

SE

O

R D

IS

CLO

SU

RE

O

TH

ER

T

HA

N A

S IT

R

ELA

TE

S

TO

V

ER

IZ

ON

W

IR

ELE

SS

IS

S

TR

IC

TLY

P

RO

HIB

IT

ED


IRVINE, CA 92618

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

ND

AT

EB

Y

09

/1

9/1

8M

H

RE

V.

9

509 S. COLLEGE AVE

CLAREMONT, CA 91711

ARROW HILL

10

0%

Z

ON

IN

G

INFIN

IGY

FROM

ZERO

IOT

NFI

IN

GY


JOB #496-017

LA

ND

SC

AP

E R

EV

IS

IO

N

11

/0

7/1

8M

H1

0

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

TO

WE

R D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

01

/1

1/1

9M

H1

1

RE

VIS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

SC

I D

ES

IG

N C

HA

NG

E

04

/0

1/1

9M

H1

2R

EV

IS

ED

1

00

% Z

D

A-4

DE

TA

ILS

3

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

8

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

NO

T U

SE

D

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

10

7

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

9N

OT

U

SE

D

EN

LA

RG

ED

F

RP

P

AN

EL

NO

T U

SE

D

ME

TA

L P

AN

EL

S

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

NO

T U

SE

D

1

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

6

AC

CE

SS

G

AT

E

2"

GA

TE

L

AT

CH

W

IT

H L

OC

K2

4

N.T

.S

.

SC

AL

E

GA

TE

H

IN

GE

03

69

12

15

20

AN

TE

NN

A M

OU

NT

IN

G D

ET

AIL

PR

OP

OS

ED

F

RP

P

AN

EL

S

TO

B

E S

TU

CC

O

TE

XT

UR

E C

OA

TE

D &

PA

IN

TE

D "B

IS

QU

E"

48

"x4

8" L

OG

O T

O B

E F

RP

BU

RS

T &

P

AIN

TE

D

CO

LO

R "B

IS

QU

E"

PR

OP

OS

ED

S

TE

EL

F

RA

ME

TO

WE

R L

EG

S A

ND

C

RO

SS

BR

AC

ES

T

O B

E P

AIN

TE

D

"B

IS

QU

E"

©2016 G

oogle Maps

509 S

College A

venue C

laremont C

A 9

1711

Arrow

Hil

l

Accuracy o

f p

hoto s

imulatio

n b

ased u

pon in

formatio

n p

rovid

ed b

y p

roject a

pplic

ant.

Locatio

n

Exis

tin

gLookin

g s

outh f

rom O

ak P

ark D

riv

eProposed

Vie

w 1

proposed t

ow

er

natienza

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT C

©2016 G

oogle Maps

509 S

College A

venue C

laremont C

A 9

1711

Arrow

Hil

l

Accuracy o

f p

hoto s

imulatio

n b

ased u

pon in

formatio

n p

rovid

ed b

y p

roject a

pplic

ant.

Locatio

n

Exis

tin

gLookin

g e

ast f

rom p

arkin

g l

ot

Proposed

Vie

w 2

proposed t

ow

er

©2016 G

oogle Maps

509 S

College A

venue C

laremont C

A 9

1711

Arrow

Hil

l

Accuracy o

f p

hoto s

imulatio

n b

ased u

pon in

formatio

n p

rovid

ed b

y p

roject a

pplic

ant.

Locatio

n

Exis

tin

gLookin

g n

orth f

rom C

astleton D

riv

eProposed

Vie

w 3

proposed t

ow

er

©2016 G

oogle Maps

509 S

College A

venue C

laremont C

A 9

1711

Arrow

Hil

l

Accuracy o

f p

hoto s

imulatio

n b

ased u

pon in

formatio

n p

rovid

ed b

y p

roject a

pplic

ant.

Locatio

n

Exis

tin

gLookin

g w

est f

rom C

ollege A

venue

Proposed

Vie

w 4

proposed t

ow

er

proposed l

andscapin

g

©2016 G

oogle Maps

509 S

College A

venue C

laremont C

A 9

1711

Arrow

Hil

l

Accuracy o

f p

hoto s

imulatio

n b

ased u

pon in

formatio

n p

rovid

ed b

y p

roject a

pplic

ant.

Locatio

n

Exis

tin

gLookin

g w

est a

cross C

ollege A

venue

Proposed

Vie

w 5

proposed t

ree

proposed t

ree

proposed t

ree

proposed t

ow

er


Agenda Report






SUBJECT:

SIGN REVIEW FILE #19-S04 REQUEST FOR A NEW SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE CLAREMONTLINCOLN UNIVERSITY BUILDING LOCATED AT 150 W. FIRST STREET. APPLICANT - EAGLESIGNS ON BEHALF OF CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY

SUMMARY

The applicant, Eagle Signs, has submitted an application on behalf of Claremont Lincoln University(CLU) for a new sign program for CLU’s headquarters, located at 150 W. First Street. The proposedsign program includes a suite of signage for CLU and up to three other building tenants that isarchitecturally integrated with the recently remodeled building and complies with the maximum signarea allowances provided for in Title 18 - Signs of the Claremont Municipal Code (CMC). Theproposed sign program would regulate current and future signage at the CLU-owned property andwould include:

· Primary identification signage for CLU through two large internally-illuminated (individual letter)

signs located on the two tower elements located at the southwest and southeast corners of the

building;

· A freestanding multi-tenant monument sign with ground-mounted up-lighting located near the

northwest corner of the building;

· Secondary identification signage for CLU located near the building’s front entrance;

· Small identification signs for the building’s non-CLU tenants; and

· Interchangeable ancillary banner signs for CLU.

In total, the applicant has proposed a cumulative sign area of 284-square feet.

Staff finds that the proposed sign program will serve the building well in that it provides for high-quality signage that effectively responds to and is integrated with the architecture of the remodeledbuilding. Staff believes that the proposal meets all of the required findings for sign programs, as set



forth in CMC Section 18.025.120.D and is consistent with the Village Design Guidelines.

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Architectural Commission adopt A RESOLUTION (Attachment A) OF THEARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT APPROVING FILE #19-S04REQUEST FOR A NEW SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITYBUILDING LOCATED AT 150 W. FIRST STREET. APPLICANT - EAGLE SIGNS ON BEHALF OFCLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY.

ALTERNATIVES TO THE RECOMMENDATION

In addition to the recommendation, there are the following alternatives:

A. Continue the item for additional information or redesign.

B. Express an intent to deny Sign Review #19-S04 in its entirety, specifically identifying therequired Sign Program Findings that cannot be met, and continue the item to the October 9,2019, Architectural Commission meeting for adoption of a denial resolution, as all of thenecessary findings cannot be met.

FINANCIAL REVIEW

The staff cost associated with the review and preparation of this item has been borne by theapplicant.

Background

The property at 150 W. First Street is located directly to the north of the Metrolink commuter railtracks on the south side of First Street between the historic Claremont Depot to the west and aparking structure to the east. The property has a total of 27,328 square feet and is located in theClaremont Village (CV) zoning district. The subject property is located just outside of the ClaremontVillage Overlay (CVO) area. The three-story office building was constructed in 1981. CLU, arecently established online educational institution, purchased the property in 2016. In June 2017, theArchitectural Commission approved the design for a major remodel of the existing office building thathas significantly altered and enhances the appearance of what was formerly a drab andarchitecturally unimpressive building. Renovation work is currently underway at the time of thisreport’s writing.

In addition to CLU, which occupies a portion of the building’s ground floor and all of the building’ssecond and third floors, the building currently has two office tenants; a law office and a non-profit.The floorplan includes space for a third tenant, potentially a wine bar or cafe, near the southwestcorner of the building.

Analysis

Sign programs are intended to provide for flexibility and creativity in how signage is provided for abuilding or commercial development. Signs permitted through a sign program need not conform toall requirements of Title 18 - Signs of the Claremont Municipal Code (CMC) in order to achieveaesthetic compatibility of signs within a project. The total aggregate area of the signs permitted in asign program, however, shall not exceed the total area of signs of the signs otherwise permitted in



sign program, however, shall not exceed the total area of signs of the signs otherwise permitted inthe CMC.

Title 18 - Signs of the CMC provides for signage for businesses located in the Claremont Villagezoning district as follows:

· Major identification sign (building-mounted): Maximum 32-square feet

· Secondary identification sign (building-mounted): Maximum 12-square feet per buildingfrontage facing a street or parking area that doesn’t have a major ID sign

· Pedestrian-oriented/under-canopy signage: 3-square feet.

Given that the CLU building fronts parking areas on its east and west side, and fronts the Metrolinkrail right-of-way to the south, each of the tenants at the subject property are afforded a total of 71-square feet of sign area pursuant to the CMC (32-SF + 3x12-SF + 3-SF = 71-SF). With a total of fourpotential tenants at the commercial property, the CMC allows for a total of 284-square feet of signarea in the proposed sign program.

Project Description

The proposed sign program includes 14 individual signs to identify CLU and up to three tenantslocated at the subject property. The proposed sign program includes a freestanding monument signadjacent to First Street, two larger primary identification signs mounted on the CLU building’s towerelements, secondary identification signage for CLU, smaller identification signage for the building’snon-CLU tenants, and five f ancillary banners to add color and visual interest along First Street. Thebelow table summarizes the signage proposed in the sign program.

The remainder of this section will describe the design of each proposed sign type in detail.

CLU Major Identification SignsThe sign program allocates a majority of the CMC-permitted sign area for the building to CLU, theprimary building tenant. The two largest signs in the sign program, each having a total of 82.5-square feet, are CLU’s primary identification signs. CLU’s major identification signs are proposed tobe located near the top of two of the building’s tower elements, one located near the southeast andCLAREMONT Printed on 9/19/2019Page 3 of 6


be located near the top of two of the building’s tower elements, one located near the southeast andsouthwest corners of the building. Both towers are clad with Aluminum Composite Material (ACM)panels that have the appearance of corten steel, a dark mottled reddish brown color. The signproposed for the western tower (Sign B.1) would face north, while the sign proposed for the easterntower (Sign B.2) would face south. The signs themselves would be constructed out of a 3-inch deepaluminum raceway panel 5’-6” tall and 15’-0” wide, totaling 82.5-square feet. The wireway panelwould be painted “satin black” a dark off-black tone that is darker than the corten steel tower claddingon which it would be mounted. The sign would feature three rows of 10.25-inch tall copy along withCLU’s symmetrical logo, which would be 3’-6.5” in height and width. Both the copy and logo wouldproject an additional 3-inches from the 3-inch deep wireway and would be internally illuminated. Thecopy would glow white when illuminated while digital printed vinyl overlays would give the CLU logo acolorful appearance when illuminated. While internally illuminated, which is not typical for the historicVillage, the illumination is through the faces of the letters only and is generally restrained in its formof illumination.

Freestanding Monument SignThe proposed sign program includes one freestanding monument sign (Sign A), located near theintersection of First Street and the Harvard Avenue extension. Specifically, the sign would be located17’-3” south of the First Street face-of-curb, 2’-10” south of the east-west sidewalk on the south sideof First Street, and 3’-4” to the east of the Harvard Avenue extension’s curb in a landscaped area.The sign’s location avoids the potential for visual obstruction for both drivers and pedestrians whileproviding the building with visual identification in a strategic location for both drivers and pedestrians.

The sign itself consists of a trapezoidal, travertine-clad panel on top of a low rectangular corten steel-clad base. The sign has a maximum height of 4’-0” and a maximum width of 7’-0” resulting in a signarea of 20.49-square feet. The travertine sign panel would have a depth of eight inches. Thetravertine material of the main sign panel corresponds with portions of the building, such as the threefin-like columns that project from the north side of the building. The corten steel material of the basecorresponds to the material applied to the building’s tower elements and a two-story canopy on thenorth side of the building. The majority of the primary sign panel would be occupied by the samecopy and logo featured on CLU’s tower-mounted primary identification signs. One-inch deepaluminum channel letters and CLU logo would be pegged 1/2-inch from the face of the travertinepanel. Seven-inch tall aluminum panels with a corten steel-like finish below the CLU copy and logowould provide sign area for two of the building’s other tenants. Copy for these tenants are brushedstainless steel. The monument sign would be illuminated with ground-mounted lighting in theadjacent planter areas.

CLU Secondary Identification Sign and Tenant Signs

The sign program proposes modest signage for the exterior of the building’s ground floor level todirect its users to the CLU’s primary entrance and to the ground floor tenants. CLU’s secondaryidentification sign (Sign C) would be mounted on a long and narrow aluminum box beam locatedabove CLU’s main entrance. The aluminum beam, having a depth of 8-inches would be affixed to thebuilding’s projecting columns on either side. The 1-foot tall beam would be 18’-1” wide and wouldfeature “Claremont Lincoln University” copy made of ½”-thick brushed aluminum letters that are 8.5-inches tall.

A smaller secondary identification sign (Sign E.2) would be located to the right of CLU’s frontentrance and would identify both CLU and another building tenant; currently the non-profit ShoesThat Fit. The sign would be made of an ACM panel of 9.13-square feet with a combination satinblack and corten steel finish mounted to the exterior of the storefront glazing on the building’s northCLAREMONT Printed on 9/19/2019Page 4 of 6


black and corten steel finish mounted to the exterior of the storefront glazing on the building’s northelevation. The sign would be located approximately chest-height and would feature a computer cutopaque vinyl overlay identifying CLU and Shoes That Fit.

Additionally, the sign program features two small six-square foot signs (Signs E.1 and E.3) that wouldhang from the canopies on the north and west sides of the building identifying the building’s groundfloor tenants. The signs would be made of ACM panels 6-feet wide by 1-foot tall with a satin blackfinish and white copy.

CLU Decorative Banner SignageThroughout the design review process in 2017, the design plans for the building’s remodel showedrecessed areas on the broad sides of three fin-shaped columns that project from the north side of thebuilding with banners located in the recessed areas. The proposed sign program includes fivearchitecturally integrated banner signs to be located on the three columns (Signs F.1-F.5). Thebanners, which CLU anticipates rotating on a quarterly basis would be 12-feet tall and four-feet wide,resulting in a total area of 48-square feet each. However, the amount of copy on each would belimited to no more than 50-square feet combined, given the CMC’s total sign area allowance for thecommercial property. CMC Section 18.005.020 specifies how sign area is calculated and allows foronly the rectangular area of the copy to be considered in calculating sign area for architecturallyintegrated signs such as these. The sign area of each banner is identified on page 14 of thesubmitted plans.

Staff is supportive of applying this approach for these vinyl banner signs, finding that they are well-integrated and enhance the architecture of the building while also providing visual interest from FirstStreet. Conditions of approval in the draft resolution require that staff review new banners beforethey are installed in order to ensure that the total area of the copy does not exceed what is permittedby the proposed sign program.

Basis for Recommendation

Staff finds that the proposed sign program meets the required sign review criteria in CMC Section18.000.010.B and that the proposed sign program serves the recently remodeled building well byproviding high-quality signage. Signs are located in well-considered strategic locations and are well-integrated with the architecture of the building so as to enhance, rather than detract from it. Theproposed sign program’s total sign area does not exceed what is otherwise permitted by the CMCand staff finds that the proposed sign program will not result in signage that clutters the building whilealso providing effective and legible identification to the building’s tenants.

CEQA REVIEW

This proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15311(a) in that the proposal consists of new on-premise signage for anexisting commercial building and use. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary.


This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Copies of the staff reportare available at the City Hall public counter, Alexander Hughes Community Center, Youth ActivityCenter, and City’s website.

On Thursday, September 12, 2019, written notices were mailed to property owners and residents



On Thursday, September 12, 2019, written notices were mailed to property owners and residentswithin 300 feet of the boundaries of the site. Copies of this staff report have been sent to theapplicant and other interested parties.

Submitted by: Reviewed by:

Brad Johnson Christopher VeirsCommunity Development Director Principal Planner

Prepared by:

Nikola HladyAssociate Planner

Attachments:A - Draft ResolutionB - Proposed Sign Program



ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLAREMONT APPROVING FILE #19-S04 FOR A NEW SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY BUILDING LOCATED AT 150 W. FIRST STREET. APPLICANT – EAGLE SIGNS ON BEHALF OF CLAREMONT LINCOLN UNIVERSITY WHEREAS, on June 25, 2019, the applicant filed a request for a new sign program for the commercial building located at the subject property; and

WHEREAS, the project site has a General Plan designation of “Claremont Village” and a corresponding Zoning designation of “Claremont Village” (CV); and

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2017 the Claremont Architectural Commission approved the

design plans for a major remodel of the existing office building located on the subject property; and

WHEREAS, on September 12, 2019, notice of the public hearing was mailed to property owners and residents of properties in a 300-foot radius; and

WHEREAS, the Architectural Commission held a public hearing on September 25, 2019, at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with said proposal were heard and said proposal was fully studied.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CLAREMONT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE:

Section A. The Architectural Commission has determined that the approval of a new sign program for existing commercial building is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15311(a) in that the proposal consists of new on-premise signage for an existing commercial building and use. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary.

Section B. Sign Program Findings In accordance with Claremont Municipal Code (CMC) Section 18.025.120.D, the Architectural Commission makes the following findings, to allow for a new sign program for the commercial building at the subject property.

1. The proposed sign program is consistent with intent of the regulations set forth in Title

18 – Signs, of the Claremont Municipal Code. Rather than detract for the City’s beautiful natural setting and well-considered and attractive manmade environment, the proposed sign program will result in signage that serves the remodeled building, and the broader community, well. The sign program provides for signage that directly relates to the architecture of the remodeled building appropriately and provides identification for the building’s primary and secondary tenants toward passing drivers, pedestrians, and rail riders. Overall, the signage in the proposed sign program will contribute to the visual quality of the surrounding Claremont Village context, just as the remodeled building’s notable architecture will.

natienza

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT A

Architectural Commission Resolution No. 2019- Page 2

2. The proposed sign program meets the sign design criteria of CMC Section 18.000.010.B as set forth in Section C below.

3. The proposed sign program meets the sign design standards of CMC Section

18.025.120.B as set forth in Section D below.

4. The approval of the proposed sign program will not permit signs that adversely affect other nearby properties. With a condition of approval that requires a 30-day lighting level review, any potential impacts to nearby residential or commercial properties resulting from the illuminated signs located on the building’s tower elements can be mitigated or eliminated entirely.

5. The proposed sign program is consistent with the General Plan and directly supports General Plan Policy 2-12.5, to “maintain design and development standards for signs in all areas of the City… that recognize that the main purpose of signs is to identify the establishment on the site,” and General Plan Policy 2-12.6, to “Encourage artistry and innovation in signs that improve the appearance of the buildings and neighborhoods in which they are located.”

6. Approval of the proposed sign program will not constitute a grant of special privilege nor provide more visibility or exposure than is available to similarly situated properties. While the majority of the signage in the sign program is small in size, pedestrian oriented, and understated, the sign program does include two large signs located high on the building’s tower elements. These two large major identification signs are not inconsistent with how other large buildings in or near Claremont’s core are identified, with large building-mounted signage located near the tops of the three-story buildings in order to take advantage of these buildings’ height to enhance the effectiveness of the signage. CLU is a major tenant that will draw visitors and students from a broad area. Most visitors will not attend the campus regularly and are likely to arrive by train or car and not be familiar with Claremont. The larger signage makes sense for an institution of this type as it will provide an appropriate level of identification.

Section C. The Architectural Commission finds that all of the sign review criteria in

the Claremont Municipal Code Section 18.000.010.B can be satisfied in regard to the proposed sign program:

1. Identification - The proposed sign program provides for major identification signage both building-mounted and as part of a freestanding monument sign, for both the primary tenant, Claremont Lincoln University (CLU) and the other secondary building tenants in a clear and straightforward manner. As described in Section B.6 above, the third-floor tower signage is appropriate for the CLU due to its regional draw of occasional visitors and students that are generally unfamiliar with Claremont and the location of the institution.

2. Architectural Context – The designs of the signs in the proposed sign program correspond directly to the architecture of the remodeled building in a manner that harmonizes with the building’s design and details by employing materials, lines, and forms found on the building. The proposed signs are strategically located to not


detract from the building’s architecture, nor do they cover or obstruct its important architectural elements. Further, just as the remodeled building relates properly to its surroundings, including the historic Claremont Depot to the west, the signage included in the sign program also properly relates to the surrounding building environment in that it is well-integrated with the architecture of the building and is generally simple, understated, and professional in appearance.

3. Design Elements

a. Materials – The sign program provides for signage that uses materials that directly take their cues from the materials used on the remodeled building. These include the use of travertine stone for the freestanding monument sign, the use of corten steel finishes on the freestanding monument sign and on the tenant signs to match the ACM panels used on the exterior of the remodeled building.

b. Colors – The proposed sign program features colors that harmonize with the building it serves, primarily by incorporating materials used by the building. Where the signage doesn’t make use of the materials found on the building, like for the two major identification signs on the building’s tower elements, it employs dark muted tones that blend well with the colors of the building, which are characterized by earth tones ranging for dark brown to a sandy off-white. Only the banners, which are intended to provide color and visual interest feature the use of bright colors that allow them to stand out. The colors have been selected to complement the earth tones of the building while remaining consistent with the color palette of CLU’s brand identity.

c. Size – The size of the signs provided for in the proposed sign program are appropriate for the large building it serves, as well as for other nearby buildings and adjacent streets. Signs located on the ground floor, along with the freestanding monument sign, have a human-sized, pedestrian-oriented scale consistent with how they will be used. The larger signs, located near the top of the building are larger, allowing them to be effective when viewed from street level and arriving trains.

d. Letter Style – Signs in the proposed sign program make use of simple and attractive lettering styles consistent with the brand image of CLU and the modern styling of the building.

e. Placement – The proposed sign program is building-mounted with the exception of the freestanding monument sign. In this case, the freestanding monument sign, located near the northwest corner of the property with visibility from First Street and Harvard Avenue extension, is appropriate, given that the building is set back over 40-feet from First Street to the north and several feet below sidewalk level. Additionally, the freestanding monument sign identifies the primary tenant as well two secondary tenants, which otherwise have limited building mounted signage.

Illumination – The sign program features only three illuminated signs, the two internally illuminated major identification signs on the building’s tower elements and


the freestanding monument sign, which is illuminated by ground-mounted fixtures. These three illuminated signs feature relatively subtle lighting whose function is to ensure the nighttime legibility of the signs.

4. Impact on Surroundings – Signs in the proposed sign program do not have the potential to detract from the visibility of other signs. Additionally, the location of the freestanding monument sign is such that it will avoid adverse safety impacts to pedestrians and drivers using the sidewalks and streets on and in the vicinity of the property.

Section D. The Architectural Commission finds that all of the sign design standards in Claremont Municipal Code Section 18.025.020.B can be met in regard to the proposed sign program:

1. Eligibility – The subject property is a building that houses multiple businesses.

2. Minimum Project Size – The building is relatively large, has multiple tenants and has multiple frontages to parking, streets, rail, and sidewalks. It clearly meets the intent of the sign program minimum size standard, which specifies no minimum size.

3. Design Elements – The signs within the sign program feature common design elements that tie signs together to create a unified look that harmonizes with the design of the building. These include the use of a shared lettering style, and the use of the satin black and corten steel colors.

4. Building Context – The sign program provides for signs that harmonize with the materials, colors, and architectural design of the building it serves. The signs in the sign program use materials that directly relate to the materials used on the remodeled building. These include the use of travertine stone for the freestanding monument sign and the use of corten steel finishes on the monument sign and on the tenant signs.

Section E. The Architectural Commission hereby approves Sign Review (File #19-S04) based on the findings outlined in Sections A, B, C, and D above, and subject to the following conditions of approval:

1. This approval is for a new sign program for the commercial building located at the subject property providing for building signage totaling no more than 284-square feet as depicted in the approved Sign Program document on file with Planning Division.

2. Construction of all signs shall be in substantial compliance with the plans approved by

the Architectural Commission.

3. This approval is valid for two years from the date of the Architectural Commission action. If building permits to install the approved signage are not issued or a time extension has not been granted during this time frame, this architectural approval shall automatically expire without further action by the City. The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to grant a one-year extension upon a written request from the applicant that there were unavoidable delays.


4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the approved freestanding monument sign, the applicant shall

a. Ascertain and comply with all requirements of the City’s Building and Engineering Divisions, including the submittal of complete architectural, electrical, mechanical, and structural plans duly wet stamped and signed by a licensed architect or engineer.

b. Pay all applicable permit and development review fees as established by City

ordinances and resolutions. c. Pay all outstanding development review fees associated with Sign Review File

#19-S04.

5. During grading and construction operations, the applicant shall:

a. Implement best available control measures (BACMs) to minimize nuisance levels of construction activity emissions such as dust, emissions, and off-site impacts. BACMs shall include but are not limited to the following:

i. Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. ii. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard.

iii. Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging

areas.

iv. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway.

v. Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or dusty

material.

vi. Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph.

vii. Hydro-seed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for more than 96 hours after clearing is completed.

viii. Require 90-day low-NOx tune-ups for off-road equipment.

ix. Limit allowable idling to 5 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment.

x. Encourage carpooling for construction workers.

xi. Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods.

xii. Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways (private and public).


xiii. Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site.

xiv. Wash or sweep access points daily.

xv. Encourage receipt of material during non-peak traffic hours.

xvi. Sandbag construction sites for erosion control.

6. Any additional signs or changes to the size, placement, design, or color of the approved signs, including the addition of or modification to illumination, shall require City approval of an amendment to the sign review approval.

7. The applicant shall notify staff when illumination for the sign becomes functional for the

City to commence a 30-day light level review. If illumination levels, glare, or other applicable issues are found to excessive, the applicant will be directed to modify the lighting as necessary to be at an acceptable level.

8. All approved signs shall be finished of high-quality materials as shown on the

submitted plans.

9. The property owner shall routinely inspect the signs on the property to ensure that they are in good repair and retain an attractive appearance at all times. If at any time the City determines that the signs or other elements of the signs are damaged or indicate a noticeably deteriorated appearance, the applicant shall replace or otherwise refurbish the sign to restore it to its original appearance.

10. The Community Development Director may make a determination to approve any minor changes to the sign program. If substantial changes to the sign program are proposed, Architectural Commission review and approval shall be required.

11. To ensure compliance with the provisions of this approval, a final inspection is required from the Planning Division when approved signs are installed. The applicant shall inform the Planning Division and schedule an appointment for such an inspection.

12. Noise sources associated with sign installation activities shall not exceed the noise levels as set forth in Chapter 16.154 of the Municipal Code. In addition, construction activities shall be limited to weekdays and Saturdays between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.

13. Noncompliance with any condition of this approval shall constitute a violation of the City’s Municipal Code. Violations may be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the administrative fines program of Chapter 1.14 of the Claremont Municipal Code.

14. The applicant/owner by utilizing the benefits of this approval shall thereby agree to defend at its sole expense, any action against the City, its agents, officers, and employees because of the issues of such approval. In addition, the applicant/owner shall reimburse the City et al for any court costs and attorney fees that the City may be


required to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant/owner of its obligation hereunder.

15. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth above or as subsequently amended in writing by the City may result in failure to obtain sign permit approval until compliance is reached. The City’s requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/or complete demolition of a non-compliant improvement regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were pulled to install signs.

Section F. The Architectural Commission Chair shall sign this resolution and the Commission secretary shall attest to the adoption thereof.

Passed, approved, and adopted this 25th day of September 2019.

_________________________ Architectural Commission Chair

ATTEST:

____________________ Architectural Commission Secretary

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

150

Wes

t Firs

t Stre

et

Clar

emon

t, Ca

lifor

nia

SIGN

AGE

CRIT

ERIA

July

29,

201

9

natienza

Typewritten Text

ATTACHMENT B

natienza

Typewritten Text

natienza

Typewritten Text

natienza

Typewritten Text

natienza

Typewritten Text

natienza

Typewritten Text

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

1

Sig

n t

ype

Des

crip

tio

nQ

tyP

age

TA

BLE O

F C

ON

TEN

TS

TA

BLE O

F C

ON

TEN

TS

Co

ver

Sh

ee

t

Tab

le o

f C

on

ten

ts -

Site

Pla

n -

Vic

inity

Ma

p

Intr

od

uct

ion

- S

ign

ag

e G

uid

elin

es

Su

bm

itta

l Re

qu

ire

me

nts

Fa

brica

tion

Re

qu

ire

me

nts

- P

roh

ibite

d S

ign

s

No

rth

Ele

vatio

n

So

uth

Ele

vatio

n

We

st E

leva

tion

Ea

st E

leva

tion

Illu

min

ate

d D

/F M

on

um

en

t S

ign

Sig

n “

A”

Pla

cem

en

t P

lan

Inte

rna

lly I

llum

ina

ted

Wa

ll S

ign

Ext

ern

ally

Illu

min

ate

d F

ree

sta

nd

ing

Le

tte

rs

18

” N

on

-Illu

min

ate

d A

dd

ress

Nu

me

rals

No

n-I

llum

ina

ted

Te

na

nt

Sig

n

No

n-I

llum

ina

ted

Te

na

nt

Sig

n

No

n-I

llum

ina

ted

Te

na

nt

Sig

n

No

n-I

llum

ina

ted

Ba

nn

ers

PLPL PL

PL PLPL

PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

VIC

INIT

Y M

AP

VIC

INIT

Y M

AP

SIT

E P

LA

NSIT

E P

LA

N

WEST F

IRST S

TR

EET

D.1

D.2

A B.1

B.2

NT

S

CE.2

E.1

E.3

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13

14

15

16

17

1 5 2 6

1 2 1 2 1 1 1 53 7

4 8

A B C D E.1

E.2

E.3 F

F.5

F.4

F.3

F.2

F.1

A B C D E.1

E.2

E.3

GR

AN

D T

OTA

LM

AX

AL

LO

WE

D

SIG

NQ

TY

SQ

FT

TOTA

L

1 2 1 2 1 1 1

SQ

UA

RE

FO

OTA

GE

CH

AR

T

20.4

982

.50

18.0

86.

006.

009.

136.

00

20.4

916

5.00

18.0

812

.00

6.00

9.13

6.00

283.

7028

4.00

F.1

F.2

F.3

F.4

F.5

1 1 1 1 1

5.00

12.0

09.

0013

.50

7.50

5.00

12.0

09.

0013

.50

7.50

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

A

ll s

ignage a

t C

lare

mont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity is

contr

olled b

y t

hese

Sig

n

Guid

elines.

The G

uid

elines

will contr

ibute

to t

he v

itality

and t

hem

ati

c n

atu

re o

f C

lare

mont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity,

and h

ave b

een c

are

fully p

lanned t

o e

nhance t

he

mark

eti

ng o

pport

unit

ies

for

use

rs,

and t

o r

esp

ond t

o t

he im

age o

bje

cti

ves

of

the

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity a

long w

ith t

he c

ity o

f C

lare

mont

sign c

ode.

The s

ign s

tandard

secti

on o

f th

is d

ocum

ent

revie

ws

the t

ypes

of

signs

allow

ed

and t

heir

form

, m

ate

rials

, si

ze a

nd p

lacem

ent

alo

ng w

ith m

anufa

ctu

ring

requir

em

ents

, si

gn s

ubm

itta

l re

quir

em

ents

and a

ppro

val pro

cedure

s.

Sig

ns

at

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity m

ust

be d

evelo

ped w

ithin

these

guid

elines

and f

ollow

the r

equir

ed a

ppro

val pro

cedure

s.

The P

ropert

y L

andlo

rd/M

angager

and t

he C

ity o

f C

lare

mont

are

resp

onsi

ble

for

final in

terp

reta

tions

of

the g

uid

elines

and a

t th

eir

collecti

ve d

iscre

tion m

ay m

odif

y

these

requir

em

ents

to a

ccom

modate

unfo

rseen c

ircum

stances.

INT

RO

DU

CT

ION

:

SIG

NA

GE G

UID

ELIN

ES:

1.

The p

urp

ose

of

this

sig

n p

rogra

m is

to p

rovid

e t

he t

enants

a

t C

lare

mont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity a

nd land o

wner

wit

h t

he

n

ecess

ary

guid

elines

to a

chie

ve u

nif

orm

ity t

hro

ughout

the

p

ropert

y.

2.

To a

llow

suff

icie

nt,

though n

ot

excess

ive,

busi

ness

identi

ficati

on d

evic

es

so t

hat

the n

am

e o

f each b

usi

ness

locate

d t

he p

ropert

y is

cle

arl

y a

nd indiv

idually a

ssocia

ted

w

ith t

he f

acilit

ies

it o

ccupie

s, w

hen v

iew

ed b

y m

oto

rist

s and

p

edest

rians

pass

ing b

y o

n f

ronta

ge s

treets

and w

alk

ways.

3.

To a

llow

suff

icie

nt,

though n

ot

excess

ive,

info

rmati

on,

dir

ecti

onal and t

raff

ic c

ontr

ol si

gnin

g f

or

c

onvenie

nt

and e

ffic

ient

opera

tion.

4.

To h

ave info

rmati

onal,

and u

nif

orm

sig

nage t

hro

ugh d

esi

gn,

s

ize,

heig

ht,

colo

r, a

nd m

ate

rials

.

5.

To insu

re t

hat

the s

igns

and identi

ficati

on d

o n

ot

decre

ase

s

afe

ty a

nd e

ffic

ient

traff

ic f

low

s in

fro

nti

ng s

treets

.

6.

To insu

re t

hat

the s

ign a

nd identi

ficati

on d

evic

es

adhere

to

a

nd d

o n

ot

exceed t

he z

onin

g r

egula

tions

as

requir

ed b

y t

he C

ity o

f C

lare

mont.

7.

To e

stablish

a s

ign a

nd identi

ficati

on s

yst

em

that

is h

ighly

legib

le,

dura

ble

, vandal re

sist

ant

and c

om

plim

ents

the

a

rchit

ectu

ral and landsc

aped c

oncept

of

the p

ropert

y.

GU

IDELIN

ES S

UM

MA

RY:

An e

fficie

nt

signage a

nd g

raphic

syst

em

functi

ons

as

an

in

tegra

l part

of

its

envir

onm

ent.

Unifi

ed a

nd c

ontr

olled

signage m

utu

ally b

enefi

t all t

enants

and v

isit

ors

in

pro

jecti

ng a

cohesi

ve a

nd c

onsi

stent

them

e w

ithout

overp

ow

eri

ng t

he a

rchit

ectu

ral and landsc

ape

envir

onm

ent.

To m

ain

tain

the c

onsi

stency o

f th

e a

rchit

ectu

ral and

landsc

ape o

f th

e p

ropert

y, n

o s

ign s

hall b

e p

erm

itte

d w

ithin

th

e p

roje

ct

boundari

es

that

does

not

confo

rm w

ith t

he

standard

s and d

esi

gn r

equir

em

ents

set

here

in.

The c

reati

on

of

a m

inim

al sy

stem

will sa

tisf

y a

ll e

ssenti

al si

gnage

requir

em

ents

while p

reventi

ng v

isual clu

tter

thro

ughout

the p

ropert

y. T

he im

ple

menta

tion o

f th

is s

yst

em

will

rein

forc

e t

he q

uality

busi

ness

envir

onm

ent

wit

hin

the

pro

pert

y.

Inclu

ded in t

hese

guid

elines

are

majo

r id

enti

ficati

on,

tenant

sign a

llow

ances,

allow

able

sig

n t

ypes,

typic

al

const

ructi

on r

equir

em

ents

and r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val

pro

cedure

s.

GEN

ER

AL P

RO

VIS

ION

S:

1.

All s

igns

are

subje

ct

to p

lannin

g r

evie

w a

nd a

re t

o b

e

subm

itte

d t

o t

he p

ropert

y o

wner

or

manager

for

revie

w t

o

insu

re t

hat

the p

ropose

d s

igns

are

in a

ccord

wit

h t

his

sig

n

pro

gra

m.

2.

Desi

gn s

ubm

itta

ls t

o inclu

de s

ite p

lan,

locati

on o

f si

gn,

setb

acks

and o

r vis

ion t

riangle

to insu

re t

hat

the fl

ow

of

vehic

ula

r and p

edest

rian t

raffi

c a

re n

ot

inte

rrupte

d.

3.

All p

rivate

sig

ns

shall b

e locate

d o

uts

ide t

he p

ublic

r

ight-

of-

way.

4.

All s

igns

are

to b

e a

ppro

ved b

y t

he C

ity o

f C

lare

mont

pla

nnin

g a

nd b

uildin

g d

epart

ment

wit

h a

perm

it a

cquir

ed

pri

or

to f

abri

cati

on a

nd inst

allati

on.

OBJEC

TIV

E:

2

Pro

ject

Addre

ss:

150 W

est

Fir

st S

treet

Cla

rem

ont,

Califo

rnia

91711

Ow

ner/

Landlo

rd:

Sig

n C

onsu

ltant:

Eagle

Sig

ns

1028 E

ast

Acacia

Str

eet

Onta

rio,

Califo

rnia

91761

Dre

w S

alo

me

909.9

23.3

034

CO

NTA

CT

S:

Tony D

igio

vanni

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity

250 W

Fir

st S

treet,

Suit

e 3

30

Cla

rem

ont,

Califo

rnia

91711

Dir

ect:

(909)

667-4

410

Cell:

(714)

679-7

849

.

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

3

Sig

n A

llow

ances:

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity

use

s in

div

idual

lett

ers

and l

ogo f

or

tenant

signs

on c

ust

om

hangin

g p

anels

wit

h

bra

ckets

above

the t

enants

entr

y.

Exce

pti

ons

can b

e m

ade o

n a

per

case

basi

s w

hen a

hangin

g s

ign i

s not

applica

ble

to a

tenant’

s sp

ace

.

Channel le

tter

types

that

are

appro

ved f

or

this

pro

pert

y are

deta

iled in t

his

Sig

n P

rogra

m.

Channel le

tters

are

cu

rrentl

y lim

ited t

o C

lare

mont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity.

Any

change i

n c

hannel

lett

ers

allow

ed w

ould

have

to b

e

appro

ved the la

ndlo

rd a

nd the C

ity

of Cla

rem

ont.

1. Each

tenant is

allow

ed O

ne (1) si

gn o

n the m

ain

/ p

rim

ary

ele

vati

on o

f th

eir

tenant sp

ace

.

2. Const

ruct

ion d

eta

ils fo

r te

nant si

gns ca

n b

e found o

n p

ages 14 a

nd 1

5 o

f th

e sig

n p

rogra

m.

Tenant M

onum

ent Sig

ns:

These

sig

ns are

pro

vided for pro

ject

and tenant id

enti

fica

tion.

The la

ndlo

rd/m

anager w

ill d

eci

de w

hic

h tenant w

ill b

e id

enti

fied o

n the m

onum

ent si

gn.

All t

enants

should

refe

r to

their

lease

for

clari

fica

tion.

Eligib

le t

enants

will be r

esp

onsi

ble

for

the t

enant

panel

cost

s of addin

g their

busi

ness

nam

e to the m

onum

ent si

gn.

No tenant sh

all in

stall a

sig

n w

ithout th

e d

esi

gn a

ppro

val o

f th

e la

ndlo

rd/m

anager.

TEN

AN

T W

ALL/M

OM

UM

EN

T S

IGN

ALLO

WA

NC

ES &

DESIG

N R

EQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS:

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity

has

a s

peci

fic

pro

cess

to s

ubm

it s

ign d

esi

gns

for

revi

ew

and a

ppro

val by

the

landlo

rd/m

anager

pri

or

to p

rocu

ring a

perm

it f

or

sign f

abri

cati

on a

nd inst

all.

This

sect

ion is

pro

vided a

s a g

uid

eline t

o p

rocu

re a

ppro

vals

and p

erm

its.

Overv

iew

:

This

revi

ew

and p

erm

it p

roce

ss is

pro

vided t

o insu

re t

hat

all d

esi

gn s

tandard

s are

consi

stent

wit

h t

he

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity

Sign P

rogra

m s

tandard

s.Te

nants

are

requir

ed t

o s

ubm

it t

o t

he landlo

rd/m

anager

a s

ign a

pplica

tion f

or

their

tenant

space

sig

ns

to b

e

revi

ew

ed b

y landlo

rd o

r m

anager.

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity

Desi

gn R

equir

em

ents

:

All s

ign d

esi

gns

to h

ave

the f

ollow

ing f

or

revi

ew

;

1.

A s

ite p

lan w

ith t

he loca

tion o

f th

e s

ign(s

).

2.

Desi

gns

should

incl

ude p

lan v

iew

, si

de v

iew

and e

leva

tions.

3.

The s

ign d

esi

gn e

leva

tion is

to incl

ude a

ll d

imensi

ons,

colo

rs,

mate

rial and t

ypogra

phy.

4.

The a

ddre

ss a

nd p

ropert

y of

the s

ign t

o b

e lis

ted in t

he t

itle

blo

ck o

f th

e d

esi

gns.

5.

All s

ign d

esi

gns

are

to c

onfo

rm w

ith t

hese

sig

n g

uid

elines.

6.

Any

desi

gns

that

do n

ot

meet

these

requir

em

ents

will be r

etu

rned f

or

desi

gn r

evi

sion.

Revie

w:

The a

pplica

tion f

or

revi

ew

may

be r

equest

ed f

rom

the

managem

ent

team

.Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity

The a

pplica

tion m

ust

incl

ude a

ll n

ece

ssary

desi

gns

requir

ed f

or

revi

ew

pri

or

to b

ein

g a

ccepte

d b

y th

e

Cla

rem

ont

Lin

coln

Univ

ers

ity

landlo

rd/m

anager.

All s

igns

are

to b

e a

ppro

ved b

y th

e b

oard

pri

or

to m

ovi

ng f

orw

ard

wit

h p

erm

its

from

the C

ity

of

Cla

rem

ont.

Perm

it P

ackage R

equir

em

ents

:

Upon landlo

rd/m

anager

appro

val,

the p

ropert

y ow

ner

will be r

equir

ed t

o o

bta

in p

erm

its

from

the C

ity

of

Cla

rem

ont.

All r

equir

em

ents

set

fort

h b

y th

e C

ity

of

Cla

rem

ont

must

be m

et

and m

ust

Incl

ude a

ll r

equir

em

ents

for

desi

gn lis

ted a

bove

.

Sig

n R

em

oval:

If a

ny

signs

are

rem

ove

d f

rom

a s

ite o

r buildin

g,

then t

hat

loca

tion o

r fa

scia

must

be b

rought

back

to t

he

ori

gin

al co

ndit

ion p

rior

to t

he inst

all o

f th

e r

em

ove

d s

ign.

Shadow

ing a

nd s

tain

s le

ft o

n a

buildin

g w

ill not

be a

ccepta

ble

.Si

te o

r la

ndsc

ape m

ust

be r

ecl

aim

ed if

a m

onum

ent

sign is

rem

ove

d.

SU

BM

ITTA

LS,

REV

IEW

S A

ND

APPR

OVA

LS:

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

1.

No e

xpose

d r

ace

ways

are

allow

ed.

2.

No e

xpose

d c

onduit

or

ele

ctri

cal w

irin

g.

3.

Cabin

et

signs

are

not

allow

ed.

4.

All c

onduct

ors

, tr

ansf

orm

ers

and f

ast

eners

are

to b

e c

once

ale

d.

No e

xpose

d c

om

ponents

will be a

llow

ed.

5.

All p

enetr

ati

ons

to b

e n

eatl

y se

ale

d.

Expose

d h

ole

s or

uneve

n t

extu

res

as

a r

esu

lt o

f si

gns

are

pro

hib

ited.

6.

No d

am

age t

o t

he b

uildin

g b

y in

stall o

r re

mova

l is

allow

ed.

all c

ontr

act

ors

are

to leave

the s

ite

com

ple

ted w

ith c

ondit

ions

that

are

acc

epta

ble

to t

he p

ropert

y ow

ner.

7.

Manufa

cture

rs labels

, perm

it t

ags

and U

L la

bels

are

to b

e p

lace

d o

n t

he s

ide o

f one (

1)

channel le

tter

as

requir

ed b

y U

L and t

he C

ity

of

Cla

rem

ont.

8.

Post

ers

, blo

w u

p d

ispla

ys o

r any

tem

pora

ry s

igns

will not

be a

llow

ed o

n t

he p

ropert

y w

ithout

wri

tten

conse

nt

from

the p

ropert

y ow

ner/

mangager.

These

dis

pla

ys if

allow

ed a

re n

ot

to e

xce

ed a

thre

e (

3)

day

peri

od o

f use

at

a t

ime w

ith a

maxim

um

thre

e (

3)

tim

e u

se p

er

year.

9.

Fla

shin

g,

movi

ng o

r audib

le d

ispla

ys a

re n

ot

allow

ed o

n t

he p

ropert

y, r

oof

or

sidew

alk

s of

the p

ropert

y.

10.

Expose

d n

eon w

ithin

the lett

ers

et

or

mounte

d o

n t

he f

asc

ia is

pro

hib

ited.

The p

refe

rred f

orm

of

illu

min

ati

on is

LED

.

11.

Sign w

ord

ing t

o b

e lim

ited t

o t

he t

itle

of

the b

usi

ness

. Se

condary

mess

ages

are

not

allow

ed.

PR

OH

IBIT

ED

SIG

NS A

ND

CO

MPO

NEN

TS:

The f

abri

cati

on a

nd inst

allati

on o

f all s

igns

shall b

e s

ubje

ct t

o t

he f

ollow

ing r

est

rict

ions:

1.

All s

igns

shall b

e f

abri

cate

d a

nd inst

alled w

ith U

L appro

ved c

om

ponents

in c

om

pliance

wit

h a

ll a

pplica

ble

b

uildin

g a

nd e

lect

rica

l co

des.

2.

Sig

n m

anufa

cture

r sh

all s

upply

a U

L la

bel in

an inco

nsp

icuous

loca

tion.

In n

o c

ase

shall a

ny

m

anufa

cture

r’s

label be v

isib

le f

rom

the s

treet

from

norm

al vi

ew

ing a

ngle

s.

3.

Sig

n p

erm

it s

tick

ers

shall b

e a

ffixed t

o t

he t

op e

dge o

f si

gns

or

lett

ers

, and o

nly

that

port

ion o

f th

e p

erm

it s

tick

er

that

is legally

requir

ed t

o b

e v

isib

le s

hall b

e e

xpose

d.

4.

Sig

ns

shall b

e m

ade o

f dura

ble

rust

inhib

ited m

ate

rials

that

are

appro

pri

ate

and c

om

plim

enta

ry t

o t

he

b

uildin

g.

5.

All f

orm

ed m

eta

l (i

.e.

lett

erf

orm

s) s

hall b

e f

abri

cate

d u

sing f

ull w

eld

const

ruct

ion.

6.

All s

igns

shall b

e f

abri

cate

d a

nd inst

alled w

ith n

o v

isib

le s

crew

s, s

eam

s, r

ivets

, or

fast

enin

g d

evi

ces.

F

inis

hed s

urf

ace

s sh

all b

e f

ree f

rom

“oil c

annin

g” o

r w

arp

ing.

7.

Separa

te a

ll f

err

ous

and n

on-f

err

ous

meta

ls.

Sta

inle

ss s

teel fa

steners

shall b

e u

sed t

o s

ecu

re f

err

ous

to n

on-f

err

ous

meta

ls.

8.

Thre

aded r

ods

or

anch

or

bolt

s sh

all b

e u

sed t

o m

ount

sign lett

ers

that

are

space

d o

ff t

he w

all o

r b

ack

gro

und.

Mounts

consi

st o

f all-t

hre

ad p

ost

and s

pace

r sl

eeve

s fo

r co

nsi

stency

. S

pace

rs p

ain

ted t

o

m

atc

h b

uildin

g c

olo

r. All b

olt

s and m

ounti

ng d

evi

ces

shall c

onsi

st o

f porc

ela

in fi

nis

hed iro

n,

stain

less

s

teel,

alu

min

um

or

carb

on b

eari

ng s

teel w

ith p

ain

ted fi

nis

h.

No b

lack

iro

n w

ill be p

erm

itte

d.

Angle

clips

a

ttach

ed t

o lett

er

sides

will not

be p

erm

itte

d.

9.

Pain

t co

lors

and fi

nis

hes

must

be r

evi

ew

ed a

nd a

ppro

ved b

y th

e O

wner.

Colo

r co

ati

ngs

shall m

atc

h e

xact

ly t

he s

peci

fied c

olo

rs o

n t

he a

ppro

ved p

lans.

10.

Surf

ace

s w

ith c

olo

r hues

pro

ne t

o f

adin

g (

e.g

. past

els

, fluore

scent,

inte

nse

reds,

yellow

s and p

urp

les)

s

hall b

e c

oate

d w

ith u

ltra

viole

t in

hib

itin

g c

lear

coat

in a

matt

e,

glo

ss o

r se

mi-

glo

ss fi

nis

h.

11.

All s

ign fi

nis

hes

shall b

e f

ree o

f dust

, ora

nge p

eel,

dri

ps

and r

uns.

Fin

ishes

should

have

unif

orm

co

vera

ge a

nd b

e o

f th

e h

ighest

quality

(e.g

. M

att

hew

s Pain

t Com

pany)

.

12.

Surf

ace

bri

ghtn

ess

of

all illum

inate

d m

ate

rials

shall b

e c

onsi

stent

in a

ll lett

ers

and c

om

ponents

of

the

s

ign.

Lig

ht

leaks

are

not

perm

itte

d.

All w

eep h

ole

s sh

all h

ave

a lig

ht

tight

baffl

e.

FA

BR

ICAT

ION

REQ

UIR

EM

EN

TS:

4

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

NO

RT

H E

LEVAT

ION

1

Sca

le:

3/3

2” =

1’-

0”

B.1

5

CD

.1

E.1

E.2

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

SO

UT

H E

LEVAT

ION

2

Sca

le:

3/3

2” =

1’-

0”

6

B.2

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

WEST E

LEVAT

ION

3

Sca

le:

3/3

2” =

1’-

0”

7

E.3

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

EA

ST E

LEVAT

ION

4

Sca

le:

3/3

2” =

1’-

0”

8

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

9

EXT

ER

NA

LLY

ILLU

MIN

AT

ED

S/F

PR

IMA

RY P

RO

JEC

T ID

/MU

LTI-

TEN

AN

T M

ON

UM

EN

T S

IGN

O

ne u

nit

requir

ed

ASca

le:

¾” =

1’-

0”

7’-

0”

6’-

9”

1’-

8”

1’-

0”

8”

4’-

0”

3’-

2”

1’-

6¾

”

10”

7”

1.

Pro

ject

Tra

vert

ine m

onum

ent

cla

ddin

g.

2.

1” d

eep f

abri

cate

d a

lum

inum

channel le

tters

and logo p

egged ½

” f

rom

backgro

und.

Retu

rns

to b

e p

ain

ted s

ati

n b

lack.

Face o

f lo

go t

o h

ave d

igit

ally p

rinte

d v

inyl overl

ay.

Exte

rnal illu

min

ati

on p

rovid

ed b

y w

eath

erp

roof

gro

und m

ounte

d lig

hti

ng.

3.

6¼

” x

18” x

1½

” d

eep r

evers

e a

lum

inum

pan.

Tenant

copy t

o b

e ½

” t

hic

k F

CO

sta

inle

ss s

teel w

ith b

rush

ed f

inis

h (

hori

zonta

l gra

in).

4.

Cort

en s

teel base

cla

ddin

g.

5.

½” t

hic

k F

CO

sta

inle

ss s

teel addre

ss n

um

era

l w

ith b

rush

ed f

inis

h (

hori

zonta

l gra

in).

EN

D V

IEW

One u

nit

requir

ed

1Sca

le:

¾” =

1’-

0”

4⅝

”

6’-

1⅝

”

45312

SH

OE

S T

HA

T F

ITS

HO

ES

TH

AT

FIT

MA

HO

NE

Y &

SO

LL

LL

PA

tto

rne

ys a

t L

aw

MA

HO

NE

Y &

SO

LL

LL

PA

tto

rne

ys a

t L

aw

20.4

9’

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

MO

NU

MEN

T S

IGN

PLA

CEM

EN

T P

LA

N1

Sca

le:

1/8

” =

1’-

0”

PL

PL

3’-4

”

Hyd

ran

t

15’-

11” 17’-

3”

A

2’-1

0”

10

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

11

15’-

0”

5’-

6”

3’-

6½

”

10¼

”

EQ

EQ IN

TER

NA

LLY

ILLU

MIN

AT

ED

WA

LL S

IGN

Tw

o u

nit

s re

quir

ed

Sca

le:

½” =

1’-

0”

82.5

0’

B.1

B.2

31 2

SID

E V

IEW

Sca

le:

½” =

1’-

0”

1

6”

1.

3” d

eep a

lum

inum

wir

ew

ay p

ain

ted s

ati

n b

lack.

2.

3” d

eep inte

rnally illum

inate

d c

hannel le

tters

and logo.

Retu

rns

to b

e p

ain

ted s

ati

n w

hit

e.

Faces

to b

e t

ransl

ucent

whit

e a

cry

lic p

last

ic r

eta

ined b

y w

hit

e t

rim

cap e

dge.

Logo t

o h

ave d

igit

ally p

rinte

d v

inyl overl

ay.

C

ente

r cir

cle

is

open a

rea.

Inte

rnal illu

min

ati

on p

rovid

ed b

y 6

500K

whit

e L

ED

module

s.

3.

Fin

ished w

all s

urf

ace (

Cort

en A

CM

).

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

12

17’-

0”

1’-

0”

NO

N-I

LLU

MIN

AT

ED

DIM

EN

SIO

NA

L L

ET

TER

SO

ne s

et

requir

ed

CSca

le:

¾” =

1’-

0”1

1.

12” h

igh x

8” d

eep h

ori

zonta

l alu

min

um

box b

eam

by S

ignage C

ontr

acto

r.

2.

½” t

hic

k F

CO

alu

min

um

lett

ers

wit

h b

rush

ed f

inis

h (

hori

zonta

l gra

in).

3.

2” x

2” x

3/1

6” a

lum

inum

angle

fra

me w

eld

ed a

t all inte

rsecti

ons.

4.

.080” a

lum

inum

cla

ddin

g p

ain

ted s

ati

n b

lack.

5.

Secure

to c

olu

mns

via

⅜” d

iam

ete

r to

ggle

s (4

per

end).

6.

Rem

ovable

.080” a

lum

inum

back s

ecure

d v

ia c

ounte

rsunk #

10 f

lat

head s

cre

ws.

7.

Secure

lett

ers

to f

inis

hed b

eam

via

#10 s

tuds.

28½

”

18.0

8’

18’-

1”

1’-

0”

8½

”

8”

4 2 7 563

SEC

TIO

N

1Sca

le:

3” =

1’-

0”

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

2”

1.

2” d

eep c

ust

om

fabri

cate

d s

tain

less

ste

el re

vers

e c

hannel le

tter

wit

h #

4 b

rush

ed f

inis

h,

hori

zonta

l gra

in.

2.

Alu

min

um

angle

clip a

ttachm

ent

wit

h f

lat

head s

cre

w.

3.

Buildin

g f

ram

ing s

yst

em

.

4.

Fin

ished b

uildin

g s

urf

ace (

perf

ora

ted m

eta

l).

SEC

TIO

N1

NT

S

1’-

6”

4’-

0”

NO

N-I

LLU

MIN

AT

ED

CH

AN

NEL N

UM

ER

ALS

Tw

o s

ets

requir

ed

Sca

le:

1½

” =

1’-

0”

6.0

0’

D.1

D.2

13

41 32

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

6’-

0”

1’-

0”

NO

N-I

LLU

MIN

AT

ED

TEN

AN

T S

IGN

One u

nit

requir

ed

Sca

le:

1½

” =

1’-

0”

6.0

0’

E.1

1.

AC

M p

anel w

ith s

ati

n b

lack f

inis

h.

2.

1” a

lum

inum

square

tube f

ram

e w

eld

ed a

t all inte

rsecti

ons.

Pain

t fi

nis

h t

o b

e s

ati

n b

lack.

3.

4” x

4” x

¼” t

hic

k a

lum

inum

base

pla

te w

ith s

ati

n b

lack f

inis

h.

4.

Copy t

o b

e c

om

pute

r cut

opaque w

hit

e v

inyl overl

ay.

3”

4’-

10”

C L

3”

C L

60

3 2 1 4M

AH

ON

EY

& S

OL

L L

LP

Att

orn

eys

at

La

w

14

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

5’-

6”

1’-

8”

NO

N-I

LLU

MIN

AT

ED

TEN

AN

T S

IGN

One u

nit

requir

ed

Sca

le:

1½

” =

1’-

0”

9.1

3’

E.2

1.

AC

M p

anel w

ith s

ati

n b

lack f

inis

h.

2.

AC

M p

anel w

ith c

ort

en f

inis

h.

3.

Copy t

o b

e c

om

pute

r cut

opaque v

inyl overl

ay.

SH

OE

S T

HA

T F

IT2 31

15

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

17

16

6’-

0”

1’-

0”

NO

N-I

LLU

MIN

AT

ED

TEN

AN

T S

IGN

One u

nit

requir

ed

Sca

le:

1½

” =

1’-

0”

6.0

0’

E.3

1.

AC

M p

anel w

ith s

ati

n b

lack f

inis

h.

2.

1” a

lum

inum

square

tube f

ram

e w

eld

ed a

t all inte

rsecti

ons.

Pain

t fi

nis

h t

o b

e s

ati

n b

lack.

3.

4” x

4” x

¼” t

hic

k a

lum

inum

base

pla

te w

ith s

ati

n b

lack f

inis

h.

4.

Copy t

o b

e c

om

pute

r cut

opaque w

hit

e v

inyl overl

ay.

3”

SH

OE

S T

HA

T F

IT

4’-

10”

C L

3”

C L

60

3 2 1 4

1028 E

AS

T A

CA

CIA

ST

RE

ET

| O

NTA

RIO

, C

A 9

1761

WW

W.E

AG

LE

SIG

NS

.NE

T

PH

ON

E: 909.9

23.3

034 | F

AX

: 909.9

23.3

043

Pre

sente

d B

y:

Page:

of

14

14

NO

N-I

LLU

MIN

AT

ED

S/F

BA

NN

ER

SFiv

e u

nit

s re

quir

ed

FSca

le:

¾” =

1’-

0”

12’-

0”

4’-

0”

F.1

F.2

F.3

F.4

F.5

4’-

0”

4’-

0”

4’-

0”

4’-

0”

Banners

to b

e v

inyl su

bst

rate

wit

h d

igit

ally p

rinte

d c

opy a

nd g

raphic

s. T

he p

ropose

d b

anner

copy is

a t

ota

l of

.47 S

Q F

T

BA

NN

ER

NO

TES:

CO

PY IS 1

’-6” X

3’-

4” =

5 S

Q F

TC

OPY IS 8

’-0” X

1’-

6” =

12 S

Q F

TC

OPY IS 6

’-0” X

1’-

6” =

9 S

Q F

TC

OPY IS 9

’-0” X

1’-

6” =

13.5

SQ

FT

CO

PY IS 5

’-0” X

1’-

6” =

7.5

SQ

FT

BA

NN

ER

NO

TES:

A.

The b

anners

on t

he n

ort

h s

ide c

olu

mns

are

inte

nded t

o b

e r

ota

ted o

n a

quart

erl

y b

asi

s.B.

The b

anners

will be m

ounte

d o

n t

he p

iers

wit

h p

ole

pockets

to f

acilit

ate

occasi

onal re

pla

cem

ent.

C.

The f

ram

ed n

iches

are

4’-

0” w

ide b

y 1

2’-

0” t

all b

y 4

” d

eep.

D.

The p

iers

are

29’-

0” t

all a

nd 2

0” d

eep.

The w

idth

tapers

fro

m 8

’-0” a

t th

e b

ase

to 5

’-0” a

t th

e t

op

E.

The t

ota

l sq

uare

foota

ge o

f copy o

n t

he b

anners

should

not

exceed 4

7.3

sq f

t at

any g

iven t

ime.

CLAREMONT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION

Documents

Transcript of CLAREMONT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION