CIV ENV 385-3 Professors: ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING ... · Downtown Chicago Site – location of...
Transcript of CIV ENV 385-3 Professors: ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING ... · Downtown Chicago Site – location of...
3/22/2017
1. History
2. Urbanization
3. Integrated Design Studio
4. Teamwork
5. Structural Engineering
6. Building Information Modeling, Sustainability, and Energy Modeling
7. Free-Hand DrawingStudents will develop their individual skills of free-hand drawing that will enable them to see, communicate, and to conceptualize.Students will execute several assignments in an iterative process that sharpens their design drawing communication.
8. Seminars/Lectures
9. Readings and ReportsVarious reading assignments, group discussions and reports. Page 1
A few informal history discussions will begin developing a value system by identifying and judging the best buildings that will help decision-making. History of architectural design will seek to develop methodologies and process for useful work approaches.
Design exercises will require students to create buildings ranging from simple to complex; developing graphic and modeling skills, three dimensional representation, energy analysis, design thinking, structure, and mechanical concepts. Graphic and verbal presentations will be required.
Practicing professionals will present case studies of architectural, engineering, contracting, management, and development, that will provide the student with a foundation; for understanding the complexity of architectural practice; and a general appreciation of the modern design world.
Student Designs will be developed using REVIT (a BIM platform) followed by energy simulations using EQUEST (an energy modeling platform).
Using the development of Chicago infrastructure and architecture since 1850, students will gain an understanding of the forces at work in our environment.
Professors from Engineering will interact with the studio design work with engineering analysis and calculations of engineering aspects of the design solutions.
The complexity of our modern world requires teams of professionals to work together to address building design. A one-week team project with Stanford AE+D students over the internet in second quarter is followed by a third quarter team project for the design of a tall building.
The goal of this 2-year program of Design Studio/Seminars/Research is to give students a strong, comprehensive and broad understanding of architecture, design, and engineering in the context of our present world. The program will focus on integration of design + engineering, design methods, history, creative thinking, and research while requiring students to realize designs individually as well as working in teams. The program seeks to reinforce creative engineering for future engineers or lead to a Masters in Architecture at an Architecture Graduate Program.
CIV_ENV 385-3ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING & DESIGNQuarter - Spring 2017Northwestern UniversityTues/Thurs, 4pm-6pm, TECH L441
Professors: Laurence O. Booth (312) 869-5000, [email protected] Mark Frisch [email protected] Scott Cyphers [email protected]
Northwestern Architecture Engineering & Design 385‐3‐20 Revised 2017.03.22
SEMINAR / STUDIO APPROACH: MARCH 2017 ‐ JUNE 2017 Quarter 3 Class Meets: Tu/Th 4:00pm – 5:50pm Instructors: Larry Booth, Mark Sexton, Mark Frisch and Scott Cyphers Class Hours: 40 hrs. Lectures, Seminars, Field Trips, Critiques and Presentations
164 hrs. minimum student time Date Instructor Course Topic Requirements Tu 03/28 LB/MS/MF Course Introduction Introductions and assign studio project David Weihing – TT Engineers Lecture: Chicago Spire Synopsis due on 03/30 Th 03/30 Don Semple – Krueck + Sexton Lecture: Rhino Software In class Rhino training and techniques (bring laptop with Rhino loaded) Tu 04/04 LB/MS/MF Lecture: High‐Rise Design Booth, Sexton and Frisch lecture on High Rise & Residential design considerations Th 04/06 LB/MF/SC Critiques: Programming & Site Analysis Review initial site diagrams and programming strategy Tu 04/11 LB/MF/SC Critiques: Site Design Group reviews of 3 initial Site Concepts – tower location and site analysis diagrams Th 04/13 David Corr ‐ NU Lecture: Studio Project Structures Structures Project #1 assigned. Discuss high‐rise dead and lateral systems
Critiques: Graphic Program + Site Final graphic layout of building program and Site Concept Plan due Tu 04/18 LB/MF/SC Critiques: Building Massing Group review of 3 Massing Concepts – foam models Th 04/20 Terry Guen ‐TGDA Lecture: Landscape & Urban Parks Synopsis due on 04/25 Tu 04/25 LB/MF/SC Critiques: Building Plans Individual reviews of each floor type and elevator layouts Lecture: 3D Printing 3D Printing training in Ford Rapid Prototyping Center Th 04/27 Eric Olson ‐ Transsolar Lecture: Climate Engineering Synopsis due on 05/02 Tu 05/02 LB/MF/MS/SC Critiques: Building Elevation & Plans Individual Review of building elevations & floor plans – Rhino/Revit drawings High Rise Elevator Calculation Lecture
Send digital Rhino (.STL) files to Don Semple for 3D Printing Th 05/04 Gordon Gill – Smith Gill Lecture: Supertalls Synopsis due on 05/11
Tu 05/09 LB/MF/SC Midterm Presentation 1. Site Plan with surrounding buildings, river, LSD, streets and context. 2. Plans detailing each program specific floor. 3. Minimum one full building section through elevators. 4. Minimum two perspectives – ground level plaza and bird’s eye view. 5. Structural plan with core and lateral systems 6. Drawing Assignment #1 7. 3D printed model with site
Th 05/11 LB/MF/SC Northwestern/Stanford Design Charrette NU/Stanford Team Project Introduction & Kickoff Tu 05/16 LB/MF/MS/SC NU/Stanford Design Presentation See separate NU/Stanford Project Description for presentation requirements Th 05/18 Scott Murin ‐ SOM Lecture: Building Structure Synopsis due on 05/23 David Corr ‐ NU Structures project review (sign up for individual crits with Corr) Tu 05/23 LB/MF/SC Group Book Discussion Group conversation of book TBD Critiques: Midterm Download Individual review of Midterm feedback and next steps Th 05/25 LB/MF/SC Critiques: Building Facade Individual review of exterior building envelope design Drawing Assignment #2 due Tu 05/30 LB/MF/SC Critiques: Building Plans Individual review ‐ coordination of building structure and floor plan layouts
Send digital Rhino (.STL) files to Don Semple for 3D Printing Th 06/01 LB/MF/SC Critiques: Final preparation Individual reviews of Design progress for Final Tu 06/06 Invited Critics Final Jury Presentation 1. Structures Project #2.
2. The required drawings are similar to Midterm. However, they should exhibit a much higher degree of quality ‐ detail, color, shadows, materials, furniture etc.
Site Plan with surrounding buildings, river, LSD, street context Floor Plans detailing each program specific floor, including furniture Minimum two full building sections (one through elevators) Minimum two exterior and two interior perspectives (Bird’s eye, Lobby) Structural plans with core and lateral systems Building Elevations
3. Drawing Assignment #3 4. 3D printed model with site
All drawings to fit 11 x 17 horizontal layout with graphic scale and north arrow. Verbal presentation to be 1‐2 minutes and describe the main idea / concept.
PROJECT ASSIGNEMENTS Individual Studio Design Project (65%)
Mix‐use High Rise tower Downtown Chicago Site – location of the former “Chicago Spire” and Dusable Park, boarding Lake Shore Drive and the Chicago River Program: 1,800,000 sf of program space. Students to define specific program mix. Program uses may include Retail, Office, Hotel, Apartments/Condo and Parking. Site: project to address site access (from LSD and N Water Street), existing Dusable Park development. Teams: Students will work together in teams of two or three PROJECT GOALS: Design Thinking and Synthesizing, Critical Judgment, Graphic Skills, Digital and Spatial Visualization, Decision Makin & Teamwork
Freehand Drawing Assignment – Building Exterior Perspectives (10%)
Study your building’s exterior massing, envelope and details through freehand drawings Perspective drawings should focus on materiality, light, shadow, texture and mood Drawings should be hand drawn at various scales on 11”x17” paper PROJECT GOALS: Seeing and Communicating Materiality and Detail
3D Modeling and Printing (10%)
Students will learn the Rhinoceros software to assist in building modeling and design. NU 3D Printing equipment will be used to fabricate study models. This iterative process will assist in physical modeling techniques. PROJECT GOALS: Advanced Digital Technologies to Aid Form Making
Structural Engineering Assignment (10%)
Two assignments focusing on the development of each student’s structural system Students interact with Engineering Professor, David Corr Complete engineering analysis and calculations PROJECT GOALS: Quantitative analysis and Integrating Design + Engineering
Reports and Readings (5%)
Visitor Lectures ‐ One Page Synopsis One Page Report and in Class Discussion of ‐ TBD PROJECT GOALS: Listening, Understanding and Communicating
48
| S
yste
m O
rgan
izat
ion
and
Exam
ples
3.0
Sy
ste
m O
rga
niz
ati
on
an
d E
xa
mp
les
3.1
Sy
ste
m D
ev
elo
pm
en
t
As
core
-an
d-o
utr
igg
er
syst
em
s w
ere
de
velo
pe
d in
th
e 1
98
0s
an
d 1
99
0s,
it
be
cam
e c
lea
r th
at
core
sti
ff n
ess
wa
s
crit
ica
l to
su
cce
ssfu
l ou
trig
ge
r sy
ste
ms.
Wh
ile c
ore
s ca
n b
e s
tee
l bra
ced
fra
me
s
or
con
cre
te s
he
ar
wa
lls, c
on
cre
te
pro
vid
es
stiff
ne
ss e
con
om
ica
lly w
hile
pro
vid
ing
fi r
e-r
ate
d s
ep
ara
tio
ns.
In
con
tra
st, s
tee
l co
re c
olu
mn
s si
zed
for
stiff
ne
ss c
an
gro
w la
rge
en
ou
gh
to a
dve
rse
ly a
ff e
ct
spa
ce p
lan
nin
g
wh
ere
th
ey
pro
tru
de
into
co
rrid
ors
an
d e
lev
ato
r h
ois
tway
s. L
arg
e c
en
tra
l
core
s e
nco
mp
ass
ing
ele
va
tor
sha
fts
an
d s
tair
we
lls, c
om
bin
ed
wit
h t
he
de
velo
pm
en
t o
f h
igh
er
stre
ng
th
con
cre
tes
an
d h
igh
-ris
e f
orm
ing
an
d
pu
mp
ing
te
chn
olo
gie
s, h
ave
led
to
con
cre
te a
s th
e d
om
ina
nt
cho
ice
for
core
str
uc
ture
s in
ve
ry t
all
tow
ers
em
plo
yin
g o
utr
igg
ers
to
day
. An
oth
er
wid
ely
-use
d a
pp
roa
ch is
co
mp
osi
te
120
110
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
NUMBER OF STORIES
TYPE
ITY
PE IV
TYPE
III
TYPE
II
TYPE
I SH
EAR
FRA
MES
TYPE
II
INTE
RAC
TIN
G S
YSTE
MTY
PE II
I PA
RTIA
L TU
BULA
R SY
STEM
TYPE
IV
TUBU
LAR
SYST
EM
SEMI-RIGID FRAME
RIGID FRAME
FRAME WITH SHEAR TRUSS
FRAME WITH SHEAR, BAND, AND OUTRIGGER TRUSSES
END CHANNEL FRAMED TUBE WITH INTERIOR SHEAR TRUSSES
END CHANNEL AND MIDDLE “I” FRAMED TUBE
EXTERIOR FRAMED TUBE
BUNDLED FRAMED TUBE
EXTERIOR DIAGONALIZED TUBE
Fi
gure
3.1
: Str
uctu
ral s
yste
ms
com
paris
on ta
ble
from
the
1970
s ©
CT
BU
H
con
stru
cti
on
, wit
h c
on
tin
uo
us
ste
el
colu
mn
s e
mb
ed
de
d w
ith
in c
on
cre
te
colu
mn
s a
nd
so
me
tim
es
in c
ore
wa
lls
as
we
ll. C
om
po
site
co
nst
ruc
tio
n w
ill
typ
ica
lly b
e m
ore
exp
en
sive
th
an
con
ven
tio
na
l re
info
rce
d c
on
cre
te
con
stru
cti
on
, bu
t o
ff e
rs b
en
efi
ts t
ha
t
incl
ud
e s
ma
ller
pla
n d
ime
nsi
on
s o
f
colu
mn
s a
nd
wa
lls, r
ed
uce
d c
ree
p a
nd
shri
nka
ge
, dir
ec
t, r
elia
ble
ste
el-
to-s
tee
l
loa
d p
ath
s a
t co
nn
ec
tio
ns,
an
d t
he
me
an
s to
dis
trib
ute
fo
rce
s in
to c
on
cre
te
en
case
me
nt
gra
du
ally
ra
the
r th
an
all
at
on
ce a
t th
e c
on
ne
cti
on
.
For
sup
ert
all
tow
ers
usi
ng
ou
trig
-
ge
r sy
ste
ms
wit
ho
ut
a c
om
ple
te
pe
rim
ete
r m
om
en
t fr
am
e, a
larg
e c
ore
size
is c
riti
cal t
o p
rov
ide
gre
at
bu
ildin
g
tors
ion
al s
tiff
ne
ss s
ince
th
e e
xte
rio
r
fra
me
co
ntr
ibu
tes
rela
tive
ly li
ttle
. Win
d
tun
ne
l te
stin
g a
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
of
ac
tua
l
occ
up
ied
ta
ll b
uild
ing
s h
as
con
fi rm
ed
tha
t to
rsio
na
l mo
tio
ns
hav
e p
ote
nti
al
for
be
ing
th
e m
ost
pe
rce
ive
d b
y b
uild
-
ing
occ
up
an
ts, s
o t
ors
ion
al s
tiff
ne
ss f
or
mo
tio
n c
on
tro
l ca
n b
e im
po
rta
nt.
Ho
rizo
nta
l fra
min
g is
als
o a
co
n-
sid
era
tio
n in
ou
trig
ge
r sy
ste
ms,
as
ou
trig
ge
r tr
uss
ch
ord
s th
at
are
de
ep
er
an
d h
eav
ier
tha
n t
ypic
al fl
oo
r fr
am
ing
can
aff
ec
t h
ea
dro
om
be
low
an
d m
ay
lea
d t
o n
on
-typ
ica
l sto
ry h
eig
hts
to
com
pe
nsa
te f
or
such
co
nd
itio
ns.
Co
re-a
nd
-ou
trig
ge
r sy
ste
ms
can
ge
ne
rally
be
ca
teg
ori
zed
ba
sed
on
th
eir
stru
ctu
ral m
ate
ria
l. E
xam
ple
s o
f v
ari
ou
s
syst
em
ass
em
blie
s in
th
e f
ollo
win
g
sec
tio
n h
igh
ligh
t th
e w
ays
the
co
re-
an
d-o
utr
igg
er
syst
em
ha
s b
ee
n a
da
pte
d
to a
wid
e v
ari
ety
of
bu
ildin
g t
ype
s a
nd
arc
hit
ec
tura
l de
sig
n c
on
cep
ts, i
ncl
ud
ing
som
e o
f th
e t
alle
st t
ow
ers
in t
he
wo
rld
,
bo
th c
on
stru
cte
d a
nd
pro
po
sed
.
As
core
-an
d-o
utr
igg
er
syst
em
s w
ere
de
ve
lop
ed
in
th
e
19
80
s a
nd
19
90
s, i
t
be
cam
e c
lea
r th
at
core
stiff
ne
ss w
as
crit
ica
l to
succ
ess
ful
ou
trig
ge
r
syst
em
s.