CITY HALL, 735 8TH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, …dnhiggins.com/docs/15-005 Addendum 2.pdf · Juncus sp....

CITY OF NAPLES

PURCHASING DIVISION CITY HALL, 735 8TH STREET SOUTH

NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 PH: 239-213-7100 FX: 239-213-7105

ADDENDUM NUMBER 2

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO, AND MADE AN OFFICIAL PART OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED BID.

The following exhibits and clarifications are issued as an addendum for the referenced solicitation:

• The wording for the answer to Addendum 1, Question 7, is revised per below. Question 7. Please provide a list of sites interested in taking possession of this material? ANSWER: (1) Collier County Landfill (fees may apply); (2) Riverside Circle (will accept for free if contractor samples materials and provides evidence that material is acceptable for beneficial re-use). ANSWER: There are likely many sites that may be interested in taking this material for beneficial re-use. Contractor is responsible for material disposal.

• What is the amount of the liquidated damages for this project? ANSWER: Daily liquidated damages in an amount consistent with Sec. 8-10.2 Florida Department of Transportation Standard Specification (2010) will be assessed at $1,423. Exhibit A - Lake Manor Ecological Technical Memorandum March2014 Exhibit B - Lake Manor Sediment Characterization March2014 Exhibit C – Pre-Bid Attendees List

NOTIFICATION DATE:

12/17/14

BID TITLE:

LAKE MANOR RESTORATION PROJECT

BID NUMBER:

15-005

BID OPENING DATE & TIME:

REVISED 01/6/15 2:00PM

IMPORTANT MESSAGE

PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM ON THE BID COVER SHEET.

City of Naples Lake Manor Restoration Project

Ecological Technical Memorandum

Prepared for: City of Naples

Streets and Stormwater Department

Prepared by:

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

404 SW 140th Terrace Newberry, FL 32669

AMEC Project No.: 6063130233

March 2014

Exhibit A - 15-005

Lake Manor Restoration Project Ecological Technical Memorandum City of Naples: AMEC Project No.: 6063130233 March 2014

i AMEC

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Project Site Description ....................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 1-1

2.0 Results ......................................................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Results ....................................................... 2-1

2.2 Invasive Exotic Plant Species Survey Results .................................................................... 2-9

3.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 3-1

4.0 References ................................................................................................................................... 4-1

List of Tables Table 1. Vegetation Identified at Lake Manor During the January 2014 Site Assessment List of Figures Figure 1. Lake Manor Location Map Figure 2. Soil Classification Map Figure 3. Adjacent Property Parcels Map Figure 4. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 5. Land Use Map Figure 6. Existing Topography Map Figure 7. Invasive Species Map List of Acronyms and Abbreviations AMEC AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, Inc. FLEPPC Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council FNAI Florida Natural Areas Inventory FWC Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission NWI National Wetland Inventory OSW other surface water SFWMD South Florida Water Management District SSC State Species of Special USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFWS US Fish and Wildlife Services


1-1 AMEC

1.0 Introduction

AMEC was contracted by the City of Naples to provide engineering services for the Lake Manor Restoration project. The proposed Lake Manor Restoration Project (Project) includes: 1) Dredging and disposal of approximately 6,200 cubic yards of organic “muck” that has

accumulated since Lake Manor construction; 2) Re-contouring and re-shaping of Lake Manor littoral zone for increased littoral vegetation

coverage, including plantings and natural recruitment; and 3) Creation of a pathway/trail along the south and east sides of Lake Manor to include bench rest

stops and educational platforms. In support of permitting the above referenced Project, AMEC scientists performed an ecological survey of Lake Manor (the Lake). The ecological survey included a review of potential impacts to wetlands and threatened and endangered species, as well as mapping of invasive exotic plant species around the Lake.

1.1 Project Site Description

Lake Manor is located in a residential neighborhood within a six acre parcel owned by the City of Naples (Project Site). The Lake is approximately 4-5 acres and is “L” shaped. The “southern arm” of Lake Manor is bound to the North by private properties, to the South by 6th Lane North, and to the West by 10th Street North. The “northern arm” is bounded to the North by 7th Avenue North, to the West by 12th Street North, and an easement for electrical transmission to the East (Figure 1). The approximate center point of the Project Site, where the two arms connect, is located at latitude 26.154788 and longitude -81.792352 in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, in the City of Naples, Collier County, Florida.

1.2 Methodology

A records review was conducted by AMEC prior to the site visit, and included a review of aerial photography (ESRI, 2013), a National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map [US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2014, and soil survey data [US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2012] to preliminarily identify potential wetlands. AMEC Wetland Scientist Joseph Mansuetti visited the Project Site on January 24, 2014 to evaluate the project area, and conduct the wetlands determination, survey the area for Threatened and Endangered Species, and map invasive exotic plant species.

The Project Site was accessed from the corner of 6th Avenue North and 10th Street North and was reviewed by pedestrian survey as well as by boat survey. The AMEC Scientist assessed the Project Site and recorded field observations, including vegetation and wildlife, along all edges of Lake Manor. Findings were documented with digital photography, field notes, and a sub-meter GPS unit. Results are summarized in Table 1.

Photo 1. Representative view of the south arm of Lake Manor, View to the west.


1-2 AMEC


1-3 AMEC

Table 1. Vegetation Identified at Lake Manor During the January 2014 Site Assessment

Scientific Name Common Name Vegetation Index

Category (a) FLEPPC

Category (b)

Acer rubrum red maple FACW Acrostichum danaeifolium giant leather fern OBL Albizia julibrissin mimosa N/A I Albizia lebbeck woman's tongue N/A I Aster carolinianus climbing aster OBL Bauhinia variegata orchid tree N/A I Colocasia esculenta wild taro OBL I Dioscorea bulbifera air-potato N/A I Ficus aurea Florida strangler fig FAC Hamelia patens firebush N/A Hydrocotyle sp. pennywort FACW Imperata cylindrica cogon grass N/A I Juncus sp. soft rush OBL Lemna sp. duckweed OBL Ludwigia octovalvis Mexican primrose-willow OBL Mangifera indica mango N/A Myrica cerifera wax myrtle FAC Panicum repens torpedo grass FACW I Pinus elliottii slash pine N/A Pontederia cordata pickerelweed OBL Quercus virginiana live oak N/A Roystonea regia royal palm FACW Sabal palmetto cabbage palm FAC Salix caroliniana Carolina willow OBL Schefflera actinophylla Queensland umbrella-tree N/A I Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper-tree FAC I Sphagneticola trilobata wedelia N/A II Typha sp. cattail OBL Woodwardia areolata netted chainfern OBL

Sources: AMEC (2014), FDEP (2011), FLEPPC (2013) Created by: RJM Checked by: SEM Notes: (a) Vegetative Index Category is based on the FDEP Vegetative Index Plant List (62-340.450) OBL = Obligate Wetland Plant (occur almost always in wetlands) FACW = Facultative Wetland Plant (usually occur in wetlands) FAC = Facultative Plant (similar likelihood to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands) Not Listed = Plants not specifically listed on the FDEP vegetative index plant list are considered an upland plant except for

vines, aquatic plants, and non-native plant species introduced to Florida. (b) Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC, 2013) Ranking: CATEGORY I = Invasive exotics that are altering native plant communities by displacing native species, changing community

structures or ecological functions, or hybridizing with natives. CATEGORY II = Invasive exotics that have increased in abundance or frequency but have not yet altered Florida plant

communities to the extent shown by Category I species.


2-1 AMEC

2.0 Results

Existing Site Description According to a review of aerial photographs, the project area consists of Lake Manor and surrounding landscaped land (Figure 1).

• Existing Soils: Soil on the project site is classified as Urban Land (Figure 2).

• City of Naples owns the entire project site including Lake Manor and the surrounding landscaped land. Figure 3 illustrates the adjacent properties owners.

• The site is classified as a permanently flooded, palustrine system with an unconsolidated bottom that has been excavated (code PUBHx) by the USFWS NWI data (USFWS, 2014) (Figure 4).

• Existing Land Use: Florida Land Use Cover and Classification System (FLUCCS)(2009) identify land use at the Project Site as primarily reservoirs (FLUCCS No. 5300), and small portions of fixed single units (two to five dwelling units per acre) (FLUCCS No. 1210) and commercial and services (FLUCCS No. 1400) (Figure 5).

• Existing Topography: Lake Manor Easement the elevation varies from 5 feet NAVD88 to -10 feet NAVD88 (Figure 6).

Wetland Survey Results Lake Manor (4 to 5 acres) makes up the majority of the Project Site (6 acres). The remainder of the property consisted of maintained landscape and mowed grass at the time of the site visit conducted by the AMEC scientist. The Lake is a man-made stormwater pond consisting of steep, bermed banks between 60%-90% slope. The Lake is classified as an “other surface water” (OSW). No wetlands were identified within the Project Site. Within the Lake, four “floating islands” were observed and were made up of Mexican primrose-willow (Ludwigia octovalvis), pennywort (Hydrocotyle sp.), pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), soft rush (Juncus sp.) and wild taro (Colocasia esculenta). The vegetation observed within the littoral zone of the Lake included cattail (Typha sp.), Mexican primrose-willow, pennywort, pickerelweed, torpedo grass (Panicum repens), and wild taro. The vegetation at the top of the bank included mowed grass with landscaped trees, on the south shore of the “southern arm” and the west shore of the “north arm,” as well as cabbage palm, coastalplain willow (Salix caroliniana), slash pine, royal palm, wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and wedelia (Sphagneticola tribilobata). The invasive exotic species Brazilian Pepper was the dominant vegetation on top of the bank, along the north shore of the “southern arm” and the east shore and northern area of the “north arm” of the Lake. A complete list of identified plant species can be found in Table 1. Lake Manor is a man-made stormwater pond and is classified as an OSW. The Project is intended to restore the function of the stormwater pond for both water quality improvement as well as aesthetics and wildlife habitat. The dredging of muck and re-contouring and re-shaping of the Lake littoral zone will include removal of existing vegetation; however, through plantings and natural recruitment the Project will result in increased native littoral vegetation coverage.

2.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Results

The FNAI Biodiversity Matrix website was consulted to determine if any protected species are likely to occur at the project location. The FNAI database reported that the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was “documented” within the area of the project site (FNAI, 2014). Although not a Threatened or Endangered species, the bald eagle is protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and the Lacey Act. It is illegal to take, possess, sale, purchase, barter, offer to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, the bald or golden eagle, alive or dead, including any part, nest, or egg, unless allowed by permit. Activities are restricted within 660 feet of an active or alternate bald eagle nest. The FWC Eagle Nest Locator indicated that the closest nest was located approximately 0.81 miles (4,276 feet) from the project


2-2 AMEC

area (FWC, 2014a). Bald eagles typically nest within 1.8 miles of water and the about 75 percent of all nests were built in native pines (FWC, 2014b). Large slash pines were observed on the eastern side of Lake Manor. No direct observation or evidence of bald eagles was observed in the area during the January 2014 site visit. In the event the bald eagle utilizes Lake Manor for feeding, under the proposed dredging activity, impact to the bald eagle would be minimal and temporary. As a precaution, construction management staff and workers should be made aware of the illegal activities associated with the bald eagle (identified above).


2-3 AMEC


2-4 AMEC


2-5 AMEC


2-6 AMEC


2-7 AMEC


2-8 AMEC

A snowy egret (Egretta thula) and a Muscovy duck (Cairina moshchata) (Photo 2) were observed during the January 2014 field assessment. The snowy egret is a State Species of Special Concern (SSC) in Florida. They feed in fresh or salt water habitat on shrimp, small fish, and small invertebrates. The snowy egret can be found throughout Florida in shallow waters foraging for food (FWC, 2014c). The Muscovy duck is considered a domestic duck that have been released or escaped and formed feral populations. They have the potential to transmit disease and compete or interbreed with Florida’s native waterfowl (FWC, 2014d). The dredging of organic material and re-contouring and re-shaping of the littoral zone may have temporary impacts on wading birds and waterfowl foraging in Lake Manor. Post construction, the habitat for wading birds and other wildlife to forage will be greatly improved from the current condition. The proposed project is not expected to adversely affect any listed wildlife or plant species. A fishery survey was not included in the Scope of Work and was not conducted during the January 2014 site visit. Incidental observations of fish were not documented during the site visit. However, based on information provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), exotic fish species and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) typically inhabit many stormwater ponds in Florida. There are options to mitigate for fish impacts; Fish Relocation Fish relocation includes capturing fish (via net, electro shocking, etc) and transporting in a large tank to a Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) approved lake. However, if exotic fish species and largemouth bass are captured, it is illegal to relocate these fish. To avoid the spread of exotic fish species, and the spread of the northern strain of largemouth bass, FWC requires these fish be destroyed. The northern strain of bass is, jeopardizing the southern strain largemouth bass species. Fish species found in South Florida stormwater ponds typically include largemouth bass with unknown genetics and cannot be relocated as a precautionary measure. Since it is expected that the majority of fish inhabiting Lake Manor are exotic species and largemouth bass, fish relocation would likely result in the euthanasia of fish.. Fish Netting Netting the fish to one side of the lake during the dredging operation may result in a “fish kill” due to the fish being highly stressed in a confined area and reduced oxygen levels. Netting fish is strongly discouraged for these reasons. No Action Under the no action alternative, the fish inhabiting Lake Manor will avoid the dredge area and move away from the disturbance (dredging) on their own. Lake Manor is “L” shaped and dredging practices will occur in one “arm” of the lake before working in the other “arm” of the lake. This will allow fish to move to the safety of the lake “arm” where no dredging operations are occurring. Incidental take of fish may occur, but it is estimated the number of mortalities would be lower than the mitigation practices discussed above.

Photo 2. Feral Muscovy ducks observed in the Northern arm of Lake Manor


2-9 AMEC

The “No Action” option is the preferred method for the dredging events at Lake Manor. Under the No Action alternative, the fish that currently inhabit Lake Manor will be temporarily impacted (move away from the dredge area) and/or there may be incidental take (mortality or injury) of some fish during the dredging activity.

2.2 Invasive Exotic Plant Species Survey Results

Invasive exotic plants species were observed throughout the Project Site. Table 1 includes Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC) plant categories for invasive species observed at the Project Site. FLEPPC categorizes invasive plants as Category I or Category II. Category I invasive exotic species are those species that are altering native plant communities by displacing native species, changing community structures or ecological functions, or hybridizing with natives. Category II invasive species are those that have increased in abundance or frequency but have not yet altered Florida plant communities to the extent shown by Category I species. Predominant invasive exotic species observed at the project site included Brazilian pepper, mimosa (Albizia julibrisson), and wild taro (Figure 7). The Brazilian pepper was observed on the bank and was most abundant on the northern arm (Photo 3). About 100 yards north from the south corner, the Brazilian pepper was recently cleared from the top of bank but small saplings were beginning to establish (Note- this is not visible in Figure 1 due to the age of the aerial). Mimosa was observed most around the south arm along the southern shore and as a large tree at the southeast corner. Wild taro was found throughout the lake at the water’s edge (Photo 4). Only one specimen each was observed of women’s tongue (Albizia lebbeck), orchid tree (Bauhina variegate), and Queensland umbrella-tree

(Schefflera actinophylla). The complete list of invasive species and their FLEPPC category can be found in Table 1 and the location of all the species can be found in Figure 7.

All areas were mapped, with sub-meter accuracy, where invasive exotic plants were observed (Figure 7). Prior to construction, these areas will be cleared of all invasive exotics and native wetland plants will be planted after the re-contouring and re-shaping of the littoral zone. This will make suitable habitat for wading birds, waterfowl, and other wildlife that could frequent the area.

Photo 3. The East side of Lake Manor is lined with Brazilian Pepper

Photo 4. Wild taro observed on the north shore of the south arm


2-10 AMEC


3-1 AMEC

3.0 Conclusion

The proposed Lake Manor Restoration project is intended to rehabilitate the Lake through dredge and removal of accumulated muck, re-contouring and re-planting of the littoral shelf, and through creation of a walking path for recreational use. Lake Manor is classified as an other surface water. The shorelines are dominated by invasive exotic species; however, native vegetation is present throughout. Results of the wildlife surveys conducted at the Project Site revealed no evidence of threatened or endangered species; however, it is likely the Lake is utilized for feeding by a variety of waterfowl. The Project will include removal of both native and exotic vegetation; however through plantings and natural recruitment the result will be a larger vegetated littoral shelf, which will provide improved wildlife habitat as well as aesthetic value.


4-1 AMEC

4.0 References

Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC). 2013. List of Invasive Plant Species. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Website accessed March 2014: http://www.fleppc.org/list/2013PlantList_HiRes.pdf

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), 2014a. Eagle Nest Locator. Website accessed January 2014: https://public.myfwc.com/FWRI/EagleNests/nestlocator.aspx

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), 2014b. Bald Eagle: Life History and Habitat. Website accessed January 2014: http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/managed/bald-eagle/information/biology/

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), 2014b. Imperiled Species: Snowy Egret. Website accessed March 2014: http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/imperiled/profiles/birds/snowy-egret/

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), 2014d. Nonnative Species: Muscovy Duck. Website accessed March 2014 http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/nonnatives/birds/muscovy-duck/

Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI), 2014. Biodiversity matrix report generated for Lettuce Lake easement area. Website accessed January 2014: http://www.fnai.org/biodiversitymatrix/index.html

South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2009. Land cover and land use within the South Florida Water Management district. ESRI ArcGIS 10.1, 2014

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2012. Soil Survey Data. ESRI ArcGIS 10.1, January 2014

US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS). 2014. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map from the National Map Viewer. Website accessed January 2014: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/DataDownload.html

Lake Manor Sediment Characterization Report Naples, FL

Prepared for: City of Naples

Streets and Stormwater Department

Prepared by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

404 SW 140th Terrace Newberry, FL 32669

AMEC Project No.: 6063-13-0233

March 2014

Exhibit B - 15-005

Lake Manor Ecology and Sediment Characterization Report City of Naples AMEC Project No.:6063-13-0233 March 2014

i AMEC

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Objectives and Prior Studies ............................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Work Efforts Performed by AMEC ...................................................................................... 1-1

2.0 Sampling Results ........................................................................................................................ 2-1

2.1 Muck Thickness and Chemical Characterization ................................................................ 2-1

2.2 Physical Characterization .................................................................................................... 2-3

3.0 Discussion ................................................................................................................................... 3-1

List of Tables Table 2-1. Summary of Muck Thickness and Chemical Characterization Results Table 2-2. Summary of Physical Characterization Results List of Figures Figure 1. Sediment Sampling Locations Map List of Appendices Appendix A Physical and Chemical Characterization Lab Results List of acronyms and abbreviations AMEC AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. CTL Cleanup Target Level FGCU Florida Gulf Coast University OCP Organochlorine Pesticide PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl SCTL Soil Cleanup Target Level TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure TEF Toxic Equivalency Factor


1-1 AMEC

1.0 Introduction

The City of Naples (City) has contracted AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) to determine the physical and chemical characteristics of sediments to evaluate dewatering and disposal options. AMEC staff, with assistance from City staff, performed the field work required to complete these tasks on January 24th of 2014.

1.1 Objectives and Prior Studies

The purpose of sediment characterization investigations reported here is to collect information required for design of the dredging and dredged material disposal: specifically to obtain information on the physical characteristics of the sediment that could affect dredged material dewatering and chemical characteristics that determine environmentally acceptable disposal or beneficial re-use options for the dredged materials. Dredged materials and stormwater system residuals can be beneficially re-used if the material meets FDEP Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTLs). A prior study of sediment characteristics performed by Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) for the City1 showed the materials did not meet SCTLs for arsenic and lead. Therefore AMEC did not further conduct further testing to evaluate whether the material could be beneficially re-used. The levels of arsenic and lead as reported by FGCU might have been capable of generating a leachate by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) exceeding limits established by 40 CFR 261.24, and F.A.C. 62.730.030, so it was necessary to analyze TCLP leachate for eight RCRA metals to determine if the material might be classified as a hazardous waste. FGCU had not analyzed sediments for organic chemicals considered common sediment contaminants, so common sediment contaminants, particularly those with FDEP Sediment Quality Assessment Guidelines were also tested in this effort.

1.2 Work Efforts Performed by AMEC

AMEC retrieved 8 soil cores from locations evenly distributed throughout Lake Manor, as indicated in Figure 1. Sediment cores were taken using a custom piston corer that extended to a depth of 18 inches below the organic mucky sediments or to refusal. The thickness of each core was measured and recorded. Chemical testing is required to confirm that the dredged material does not require management as hazardous waste, specifically the TCLP extraction followed by analysis of specific pesticides and metals. Eight samples were analyzed for particle size, organic content, moisture content, priority pollutant metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Bulk sediments will be collected for limited bench scale tests of dewatering procedures to support the 60% design as needed.

1 Thomas, Serge. July 2013. Bathymetry and Sediment Characterization of Lake Manor City of Naples, FL,

Southwest Florida Aquatic Ecology Group.


1-2 AMEC


2-1 AMEC

2.0 Sampling Results

2.1 Muck Thickness and Chemical Characterization

A summary of muck thickness and laboratory results for the chemical characterization is given in Table 2-1. Total sediment core thicknesses varied between 6 and 18 inches. In most cases, sediment cores had a surficial layer of organic material, or muck that transitioned to a more mineral composition with increasing depth. The TCLP results for lead, arsenic and the other metals tested demonstrate the contamination by metals does not result in their being classified as a hazardous waste by the Toxicity Characteristic. The muck sediment cores were analyzed for priority pollutant metals, PAHs, OCPs, and PCBs. Sample collection was performed as described in Section 2.2, in general conformance with FDEP SOP FS 4000. Chemical characterization samples were placed immediately on ice for transport to the laboratory. A summary of the results for which detections were returned is provided in Table 2-1. Results provided in bold italics represent an exceedance of at least one Cleanup Target Level (CTL) for that component. A full laboratory report can be found in Appendix B, which provides detection limits for all non-detect components.


2-2 AMEC

Table 2-1. Summary of Muck Thickness and Chemical Characterization Results

Sample ID MS-1 MS-2 MS-3 MS-4 MS-5 MS-6 MS-7 MS-8

Muck Depth (in.) 18” 12” 6” 10” 8” 12” 16” 6” Analyte Units

Silver, TCLP mg/L 0.02 I 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U

Arsenic, TCLP mg/L 0.04 I 0.06 I 0.04 U 0.06 I 0.04 I 0.04 U 0.04 U 0.04 U

Barium, TCLP mg/L 0.003 U 0.03 I 0.02 I 0.03 I 0.01 I 0.05 I 0.03 I 0.02 I

Chromium, TCLP mg/L 0.005 U 0.005 U 0.005 U 0.005 U 0.01 I 0.005 U 0.04 I 0.01 I

Lead, TCLP mg/L 0.62 0.04 U 0.04 U 0.09 I 0.04 I 0.04 U 0.04 I 0.04 U

Chlordane, TCLP mg/L 0.003 U 0.003 U 0.003 U 0.003 U 0.003 U 0.003 U 0.003 U 0.003 U

Chlordane µg/Kg 324 I 797 I 171 U 653 U 598 U 342 U 342 U 151 U

gamma-Chlordane µg/Kg 21.8 I 63.8 I 8.70 U 33.4 U 30.6 U 17.5 U 17.5 U 7.69 U

Acenaphthene µg/Kg 43.6 I 362 28.5 U 104 U 91.7 U 57.6 U 55.0 U 26.7 U

Acenaphthylene µg/Kg 28.1 U 146 I 20.3 U 73.4 U 65.1 U 40.9 U 39.0 U 19.0 U

Anthracene µg/Kg 168 1060 14.8 U 102 I 47.4 U 29.8 U 28.4 U 13.8 U

Benz(a)anthracene µg/Kg 2180 12300 91.1 696 305 51.6 I 84.8 26.7 I

Benzo(a)pyrene µg/Kg 3460 23900 353 2110 1210 472 35.5 U 17.2 U

Benzo(b)fluoranthene µg/Kg 7250 50200 463 3990 1840 392 569 211

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene µg/Kg 3370 22300 89.4 1780 565 81.8 U 78.0 U 37.9 U

Benzo(k)fluoranthene µg/Kg 2590 15700 104 1040 413 89.2 U 87.3 I 41.3 U

Chrysene µg/Kg 4490 25900 168 1630 604 53.0 I 135 35.7

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene µg/Kg 816 5930 49.7 U 180 U 160 U 101 U 95.7 U 46.4 U

Fluoranthene µg/Kg 5790 30800 246 2190 986 88.1 231 67.3

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene µg/Kg 3390 23600 96.4 1850 604 81.8 U 78.0 U 37.9 U

Phenanthrene µg/Kg 1090 6150 41.1 I 348 121 I 31.6 U 45.5 I 14.7 U

Pyrene µg/Kg 5800 39600 231 2220 893 89.2 226 58.9

Fluorene µg/Kg 126 716 20.3 U 73.4 U 65.1 U 40.9 U 39.0 U 19.0 U

Naphthalene µg/Kg 103 466 28.5 U 104 U 91.7 U 57.6 U 71.3 26.7 U

1-Methylnaphthalene µg/Kg 34.4 U 126 U 24.9 U 90.0 U 79.9 U 50.2 U 47.9 U 23.2 U

2-Methylnaphthalene µg/Kg 29.3 U 111 I 21.2 U 76.7 U 68.1 U 42.8 U 40.8 U 19.8 U

BAP equivalents mg/Kg 5.59 38.62 0.47 2.96 1.65 0.63 0.21 0.09

Created by: TSK Checked by: RJM


2-3 AMEC

2.2 Physical Characterization

The eight representative soil cores collected were analyzed for organic content and moisture content. Following retrieval, each core was extruded into a stainless steel bowl, mixed and deposited into glass sample containers for transport to the laboratory. A summary of the results is provided in Table 2-2, while a full laboratory report is included in Appendix B. Moisture contents ranged from 42% to 94% w/w. The organic content ranged from as low as 0.8% for sample MS-8 to 16.8% for sample MS-2. Table 2-2. Summary of Physical Characterization Results

Content Analyzed

Sample ID

MS-1 MS-2 MS-3 MS-4 MS-5 MS-6 MS-7 MS-8

Solids Content (percentage)

39 16 53 15 16 27 29 58

Moisture Content (percentage)

61 84 47 85 94 73 71 42

Organic Content (percentage)

8.0 16.8 2.4 11.5 14.0 8.3 5.3 0.8

Created By: TSK Checked By: WAT


3-1 AMEC

3.0 Discussion

Observed muck thicknesses at the 8 sample locations ranged from 6 to 18 inches, with an average measured thickness of 11 inches. The observed muck thicknesses are consistent with observations by MACTEC (now AMEC) in 2009 and Thomas (2013). Results of the chemical characterization laboratory analysis showed that most of the sediments exceed SCTLs for PAHs, bolded in Table 2-1 with the row heading BAP equivalents (benzo(a)pyrene equivalents). Carcinogenic PAHs have a common toxicity mechanism, but display different toxic potencies. Given that direct exposure SCTLs were derived only for benzo(a)pyrene, the Toxic Equivalency Factor (TEF) approach is used to convert individual PAH site concentrations into a single concentration of the index chemical, benzo(a)pyrene. Seven of the eight samples analyzed exceeded the direct exposure SCTLs for benzo(a)pyrene. The TCLP results for lead, arsenic and the other metals tested demonstrate the contamination by metals, which restricts or prevents beneficial re-use, does not result in their being classified as a hazardous waste by the Toxicity Characteristic. Furthermore, the TCLP laboratory analysis for chlordane also resulted in levels below the Toxicity Characteristic. While these materials are not considered hazardous, they are contaminated and will require disposal at a Class I or Class II Landfill as Solid Waste. The most suitable landfill to receive solid waste from this project would be the Collier County Landfill approximately 8 miles from Lake Manor.

Appendix A Physical and Chemical Characterization Lab Results

February 17, 2014 Service Request No:J1400688

William TuckerAMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.404 SW 140th TerraceNewberry, FL 32669

All analyses were performed according to our laboratory’s quality assurance program. The test results meet requirements of the NELAP standards except as noted in the case narrative report. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and ALS Environmental is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Results apply only to the items submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the report. In accordance to the NELAC 2003 Standard, a statement on the estimated uncertainty of measurement of any quantitative analysis will be supplied upon request.

For your reference, these analyses have been assigned our service request numberEnclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory

Laboratory Results for: Lake Manor

Dear William,

January 28, 2014J1400688.

Please contact me if you have any questions. My extension is 4409. You may also contact me via email at [email protected].

Respectfully submitted,

ALS Group USA, Corp. dba ALS Environmental

Craig MyersProject Manager

1 of 74

dba ALS Environmental

ALS Group USA, Corp.

ADDRESS

FAXPHONE

9143 Philips Highway, Suite 200, Jacksonville, FL 32256

+1 904 739 2011+1 904 739 2277 |

CLIENT ID: MS1 Lab ID: J1400688-001Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 39 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Silver, TCLP 0.02 I 0.02 0.10 mg/L 6010BArsenic, TCLP 0.04 I 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BLead, TCLP 0.62 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BChlordane 324 I 219 696 ug/Kg 8081Agamma-Chlordane 21.8 I 11.2 34.8 ug/Kg 8081AAcenaphthene 43.6 I 39.5 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMAnthracene 168 20.4 43.3 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenz(a)anthracene 2180 24.2 43.3 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(a)pyrene 3460 25.5 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 7250 51.0 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 3370 56.1 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(k)fluoranthene 2590 61.2 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 4490 24.2 43.3 ug/Kg 8270C SIMDibenz(a,h)anthracene 816 68.8 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 5790 25.5 43.3 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluorene 126 28.1 43.3 ug/Kg 8270C SIMIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 3390 56.1 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMNaphthalene 103 39.5 43.3 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPhenanthrene 1090 21.7 86.6 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPyrene 5800 25.5 43.3 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 80100 4400 4400 mg/Kg 9060M

CLIENT ID: MS2 Lab ID: J1400688-002Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 16 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Arsenic, TCLP 0.06 I 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BBarium, TCLP 0.03 I 0.003 0.10 mg/L 6010BChlordane 797 I 512 1630 ug/Kg 8081Agamma-Chlordane 63.8 I 26.2 81.3 ug/Kg 8081A2-Methylnaphthalene 111 I 108 158 ug/Kg 8270C SIMAcenaphthene 362 145 317 ug/Kg 8270C SIMAcenaphthylene 146 I 103 317 ug/Kg 8270C SIMAnthracene 1060 74.6 158 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenz(a)anthracene 12300 88.5 158 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(a)pyrene 23900 187 633 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 50200 373 633 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 22300 410 633 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(k)fluoranthene 15700 448 633 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 25900 88.5 158 ug/Kg 8270C SIMDibenz(a,h)anthracene 5930 503 633 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 30800 93.2 158 ug/Kg 8270C SIM

SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY

2 of 74

CLIENT ID: MS2 Lab ID: J1400688-002Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodFluorene 716 103 158 ug/Kg 8270C SIMIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 23600 410 633 ug/Kg 8270C SIMNaphthalene 466 145 158 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPhenanthrene 6150 79.2 317 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPyrene 39600 373 633 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 168000 8500 8500 mg/Kg 9060M

CLIENT ID: MS3 Lab ID: J1400688-003Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 53 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Barium, TCLP 0.02 I 0.003 0.10 mg/L 6010BBenz(a)anthracene 91.1 17.5 31.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(a)pyrene 353 18.4 62.5 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 463 36.8 62.5 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 89.4 40.5 62.5 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(k)fluoranthene 104 44.2 62.5 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 168 17.5 31.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 246 18.4 31.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 96.4 40.5 62.5 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPhenanthrene 41.1 I 15.7 62.5 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPyrene 231 18.4 31.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 24400 2800 2800 mg/Kg 9060M

CLIENT ID: MS4 Lab ID: J1400688-004Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 15 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Arsenic, TCLP 0.06 I 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BBarium, TCLP 0.03 I 0.003 0.10 mg/L 6010BLead, TCLP 0.09 I 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BAnthracene 102 I 53.4 113 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenz(a)anthracene 696 63.4 113 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(a)pyrene 2110 66.7 227 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 3990 134 227 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 1780 147 227 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(k)fluoranthene 1040 160 227 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 1630 63.4 113 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 2190 66.7 113 ug/Kg 8270C SIMIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1850 147 227 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPhenanthrene 348 56.7 227 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPyrene 2220 66.7 113 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 115000 9100 9100 mg/Kg 9060M


3 of 74

CLIENT ID: MS5 Lab ID: J1400688-005Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 16 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Arsenic, TCLP 0.04 I 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BBarium, TCLP 0.01 I 0.003 0.10 mg/L 6010BChromium, TCLP 0.01 I 0.005 0.10 mg/L 6010BLead, TCLP 0.04 I 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BBenz(a)anthracene 305 56.2 101 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(a)pyrene 1210 59.2 201 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 1840 119 201 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 565 131 201 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(k)fluoranthene 413 142 201 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 604 56.2 101 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 986 59.2 101 ug/Kg 8270C SIMIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 604 131 201 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPhenanthrene 121 I 50.3 201 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPyrene 893 59.2 101 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 140000 8600 8600 mg/Kg 9060M

CLIENT ID: MS6 Lab ID: J1400688-006Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 27 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Barium, TCLP 0.05 I 0.003 0.10 mg/L 6010BBenz(a)anthracene 51.6 I 35.4 63.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(a)pyrene 472 37.2 126 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 392 74.4 126 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 53.0 I 35.4 63.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 88.1 37.2 63.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPyrene 89.2 37.2 63.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 83100 6100 6100 mg/Kg 9060M

CLIENT ID: MS7 Lab ID: J1400688-007Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 29 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Barium, TCLP 0.03 I 0.003 0.10 mg/L 6010BChromium, TCLP 0.04 I 0.005 0.10 mg/L 6010BLead, TCLP 0.04 I 0.04 0.10 mg/L 6010BBenz(a)anthracene 84.8 33.7 60.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 569 70.9 120 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(k)fluoranthene 87.3 I 85.1 120 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 135 33.7 60.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 231 35.5 60.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMNaphthalene 71.3 55.0 60.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPhenanthrene 45.5 I 30.2 120 ug/Kg 8270C SIM


4 of 74

CLIENT ID: MS7 Lab ID: J1400688-007Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodPyrene 226 35.5 60.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 53300 4900 4900 mg/Kg 9060M

CLIENT ID: MS8 Lab ID: J1400688-008Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units MethodSolids, Total 58 0.10 0.10 Percent 160.3Barium, TCLP 0.02 I 0.003 0.10 mg/L 6010BChromium, TCLP 0.01 I 0.005 0.10 mg/L 6010BBenz(a)anthracene 26.7 I 16.4 29.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMBenzo(b)fluoranthene 211 34.4 58.4 ug/Kg 8270C SIMChrysene 35.7 16.4 29.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMFluoranthene 67.3 17.2 29.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMPyrene 58.9 17.2 29.2 ug/Kg 8270C SIMCarbon, Total Organic (TOC) 8300 2000 2000 mg/Kg 9060M


5 of 74

CASE NARRATIVE

J1400688Date Received:

Service Request:

SoilLake Manor/6063130233.2.2AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

Sample Matrix:Project:Client:

1/28/14

All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of ALS Environmental. This report contains analyticalresults for samples designated for Tier II data deliverables, including results of QC samples analyzed from this delivery group.When appropriate to the procedure, method blank results have been reported with each analytical test. Analytical proceduresperformed by the lab are validated in accordance with NELAC standards. Parameters that are included in the NELAC Fields ofTesting but are not included in the lab’s NELAC accreditation are identified in the discussion of each analytical procedure.

Sample Receipt

Eight soil samples were received for analysis at ALS Environmental on 01/28/2014. The samples were received in good conditionand consistent with the accompanying chain of custody form. Samples are refrigerated at <6°C upon receipt at the lab except foraqueous samples designated for metals analyses, which are stored at room temperature.

Semi-Volatile Organic Analyses:

Method 8270C SIM: The control criterion for all the surrogates in samples J1400688-001 through to -008 is not applicable. Theanalysis of the sample required a dilution, which resulted in a surrogate concentration below the Method Reporting Limit (MRL).No further corrective action was appropriate.

Method 8270C SIM: The Method Reporting Limit (MRL) is elevated for all target analytes in samples J1400688-001 through -008.The sample extracts were diluted prior to instrumental analysis due to relatively high levels of non-target background components.The extracts were highly colored and viscous, which indicated the need to perform a dilution prior to injection into the instrument.

Method 8081A: The Method Reporting Limit (MRL) is elevated for all target analytes in samples J1400688-001 through -008. Thesamples were extracted using less than the standard 15.0g due to problems created by the sample matrix during extraction,filtration, and concentration. In addition, the sample extracts were diluted prior to instrumental analysis due to relatively high levelsof non-target background components. The extracts were highly colored, viscous, contained particulates, and reacted with theCopper pellets during the Sulfur clean-up procedure. All of these factors were physical indicators of the sample matrixinterferences and the need to perform a dilution prior to injection into the instrument. Clean-up of the extracts were performedwithin the scope of the method, but did not eliminate enough of the background components to prevent dilution.

Method 8081A: Chlordane (technical) was quantified based on three peaks, instead of the usual four peaks, in sample J1400688-002 due to sample matrix interference.

Method 8082: The Method Reporting Limit (MRL) is elevated for all target analytes in samples J1400688-001 through -008. Thesamples were extracted using less than the standard 15.0g due to problems created by the sample matrix during extraction,filtration, and concentration. In addition, the sample extracts were diluted prior to instrumental analysis due to relatively high levelsof non-target background components. The extracts were highly colored, viscous, contained particulates, and reacted with theCopper pellets during the Sulfur clean-up procedure. All of these factors were physical indicators of the sample matrixinterferences and the need to perform a dilution prior to injection into the instrument. Clean-up of the extracts were performedwithin the scope of the method, but did not eliminate enough of the background components to prevent dilution.

Metals Analyses:

No significant data anomalies were noted with this analysis.

9143 Philips Highway, Suite 200, Jacksonville, FL 32256 | 904-739-2277 | www.caslab.com

Approved by Date 2/17/2014 6 of 74

General Chemistry Analyses:

No significant data anomalies were noted with this analysis.


Approved by Date 2/17/2014 7 of 74

State Certifications, Accreditations, and Licenses

Agency Number Expire DateFlorida Department of Health E82502 6/30/2014

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 527 12/31/2014

Virginia Environmental Accreditation Program 460191 12/14/2014

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 02086 6/30/2014

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 958 6/30/2014

Kentucky Division of Waste Management 63 6/30/2014

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 96021001 6/30/2014

Texas Commision on Environmental Quality T104704197-13-5 5/31/2014

Maine Department of Health and Human Services 2011006 2/3/2015

Department of Defense 66206 5/31/2014

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 68-04835 8/31/2014


8 of 74

! Data deviates from historically established concentration ranges* Not reported due to interference? Data is rejected and should not be usedA Value reported is the arithmetic mean of two or more determininationsB Results based upon colony counts outside the acceptable range.D Measurement was made in the field.E Extra samples were taken at composite stationsH Value based on field kit determination; results may not be accurate.I The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory

PQL.J Estimated value.K Off scale low. The value is less than the lowest calibration standard.L Off scale high. The analyte is above the acceptable level of quantitation.M The MDL/MRL has been elevated because the analyte could not be accurately quantified.N Presumptive evidence of presence of material.O Sampled, but analysis lost or not performedQ Sample held beyond the acceptable holding time.R Significant rain in the past 48 hours (typically in excess of 0.5 inches)T Estimated value, less than the MDLU Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected.V Indicates that the analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.X Insufficient individuals were present in the sample to achieve a minimum of 280 organisms

for identification (Stream Condition Index Analysis only)Y The laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly preserved sample.Z Too many colonies were present, the numeric value represents the filtration volume

Data QualifiersFlorida-DEP

9 of 74

ASTM American Society for Testing and MaterialsA2LA American Association for Laboratory AccreditationCARB California Air Resources BoardCAS Number Chemical Abstract Service registry NumberCFC ChlorofluorocarbonCFU Colony-Forming UnitDEC Department of Environmental ConservationDEQ Department of Environmental QualityDHS Department of Health ServicesDOE Department of EcologyDOH Department of HealthEPA U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation ProgramGC Gas ChromatographyGC/MS Gas Chromatography/Mass SpectrometryLUFT Leaking Underground Fuel TankM ModifiedMCL Maximum Contaminant Level is the highest permissible concentration of a

substance allowed in drinking water as established by the USEPA.MDL Method Detection LimitMPN Most Probable NumberMRL Method Reporting LimitNA Not ApplicableNC Not CalculatedNCASI National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream ImprovementND Not DetectedNIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthPQL Practical Quantitation LimitRCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery ActSIM Selected Ion MonitoringTPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbonstr Trace level is the concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but

greater than or equal to the MDL.

Acronyms

ALS Laboratory Group

10 of 74

MS1J1400688-001 1/24/2014 0836MS2J1400688-002 1/24/2014 0923MS3J1400688-003 1/24/2014 1125MS4J1400688-004 1/24/2014 1410MS5J1400688-005 1/24/2014 1225MS6J1400688-006 1/24/2014 1304MS7J1400688-007 1/24/2014 1320MS8J1400688-008 1/24/2014 1350

Client: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. Service Request:J1400688Project: Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2

SAMPLE CROSS-REFERENCE

SAMPLE # CLIENT SAMPLE ID DATE TIME

Printed 2/17/2014 10:21:13 AM Sample Summary11 of 74

J1400688-001Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS1

Base Neutral Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SIM

01/24/14 08:36

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:

8270C SIMAnalysis Method:

EPA 3546Prep Method:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:

Analyte Name QDate Analyzed Date ExtractedDil.MDLMRLResult

34.41-Methylnaphthalene 34.4 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3U29.32-Methylnaphthalene 29.3 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3U43.6Acenaphthene 39.5 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1486.6I28.1Acenaphthylene 28.1 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1486.6U168Anthracene 20.4 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3

2180Benz(a)anthracene 24.2 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.33460Benzo(a)pyrene 25.5 10 02/07/14 03:05 2/6/1486.67250Benzo(b)fluoranthene 51.0 10 02/07/14 03:05 2/6/1486.63370Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 56.1 10 02/07/14 03:05 2/6/1486.62590Benzo(k)fluoranthene 61.2 10 02/07/14 03:05 2/6/1486.64490Chrysene 24.2 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3816Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 68.8 10 02/07/14 03:05 2/6/1486.6

5790Fluoranthene 25.5 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3126Fluorene 28.1 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3

3390Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 56.1 10 02/07/14 03:05 2/6/1486.6103Naphthalene 39.5 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3

1090Phenanthrene 21.7 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1486.65800Pyrene 25.5 5 02/06/14 06:45 2/6/1443.3

Surrogate Name Q% Rec Control Limits Date Analyzed2-Fluorobiphenyl 02/06/14 06:4530 - 11834p-Terphenyl-d14 02/06/14 06:4541 - 14644

Analytical Report

ALS Group USA, Corp.dba ALS Environmental

Printed 2/17/2014 10:21:13 AM 14-0000277929 rev 0012 of 74 Superset Reference:

J1400688-001Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS1

Organochlorine Pesticides by Gas Chromatography

01/24/14 08:36

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:

8081AAnalysis Method:


01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


13.84,4'-DDD 13.8 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U15.34,4'-DDE 15.3 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U23.04,4'-DDT 23.0 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U15.3Aldrin 15.3 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U10.7alpha-BHC 10.7 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U11.4alpha-Chlordane 11.4 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U11.2beta-BHC 11.2 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U324Chlordane 219 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/14696I

11.2delta-BHC 11.2 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U18.3Dieldrin 18.3 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U15.1Endosulfan I 15.1 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U21.4Endosulfan II 21.4 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U20.4Endosulfan Sulfate 20.4 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U25.4Endrin 25.4 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U20.4Endrin Aldehyde 20.4 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U16.5Endrin Ketone 16.5 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U21.9gamma-BHC (Lindane) 21.9 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U21.8gamma-Chlordane 11.2 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8I21.9Heptachlor 21.9 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U17.5Heptachlor Epoxide 17.5 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1434.8U14.9Methoxychlor 14.9 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/1469.6U263Toxaphene 263 5 02/14/14 20:05 2/4/14696U

Surrogate Name Q% Rec Control Limits Date AnalyzedDecachlorobiphenyl 02/14/14 20:0532 - 17064Tetrachloro-m-xylene 02/14/14 20:0510 - 14751

Analytical Report



J1400688-001Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS1

TCLP Organochlorine Pesticides by Gas Chromatography

01/24/14 08:36

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:


EPA 3510CPrep Method:

EPA 1311Pre-Prep Method:

2/4/14Pre-Prep Date:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


0.00259Chlordane, TCLP 0.00259 1 02/14/14 05:14 2/6/140.00500U0.0000900Endrin, TCLP 0.0000900 1 02/14/14 05:14 2/6/140.000200U0.000131gamma-BHC (Lindane), TCLP 0.000131 1 02/14/14 05:14 2/6/140.000200U0.000150Heptachlor, TCLP 0.000150 1 02/14/14 05:14 2/6/140.000200U0.000100Heptachlor Epoxide, TCLP 0.000100 1 02/14/14 05:14 2/6/140.000200U

0.0000900Methoxychlor, TCLP 0.0000900 1 02/14/14 05:14 2/6/140.000400U0.00256Toxaphene, TCLP 0.00256 1 02/14/14 05:14 2/6/140.00500U


Analytical Report



J1400688-001Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS1

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC

01/24/14 08:36

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:

8082Analysis Method:

EPA 3550BPrep Method:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


186Aroclor 1016 186 5 02/12/14 16:26 2/4/14675U137Aroclor 1221 137 5 02/12/14 16:26 2/4/14675U442Aroclor 1232 442 5 02/12/14 16:26 2/4/14675U182Aroclor 1242 182 5 02/12/14 16:26 2/4/14675U329Aroclor 1248 329 5 02/12/14 16:26 2/4/14675U249Aroclor 1254 249 5 02/12/14 16:26 2/4/14675U191Aroclor 1260 191 5 02/12/14 16:26 2/4/14675U

Surrogate Name Q% Rec Control Limits Date AnalyzedDecachlorobiphenyl 02/12/14 16:2610 - 25845

Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 08:36

Inorganic Parameters

Basis: As Received

Analysis MethodAnalyte Name QDate Analyzed Date ExtractedDil.MDLMRLResult Units

Sample Name: MS1

Lab Code: J1400688-001

Toxicity Characteristics Leachate Procedure (TCLP)


Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 21:31 02/07/1410.040.10I0.046010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:31 02/07/1410.0030.10U0.0036010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:31 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:31 02/07/1410.0050.10U0.0056010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 21:31 02/07/1410.040.100.626010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:36 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:31 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 21:30 02/07/1410.020.10I0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



J1400688-002Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS2


01/24/14 09:23

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


1261-Methylnaphthalene 126 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/14158U1112-Methylnaphthalene 108 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/14158I362Acenaphthene 145 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/14317146Acenaphthylene 103 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/14317I

1060Anthracene 74.6 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/1415812300Benz(a)anthracene 88.5 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/1415823900Benzo(a)pyrene 187 20 02/07/14 04:05 2/6/1463350200Benzo(b)fluoranthene 373 20 02/07/14 04:05 2/6/1463322300Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 410 20 02/07/14 04:05 2/6/1463315700Benzo(k)fluoranthene 448 20 02/07/14 04:05 2/6/1463325900Chrysene 88.5 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/141585930Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 503 20 02/07/14 04:05 2/6/14633

30800Fluoranthene 93.2 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/14158716Fluorene 103 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/14158

23600Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 410 20 02/07/14 04:05 2/6/14633466Naphthalene 145 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/14158

6150Phenanthrene 79.2 5 02/06/14 07:45 2/6/1431739600Pyrene 373 20 02/07/14 04:05 2/6/14633


Analytical Report



J1400688-002Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS2


01/24/14 09:23

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


32.34,4'-DDD 32.3 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U35.64,4'-DDE 35.6 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U53.64,4'-DDT 53.6 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U35.7Aldrin 35.7 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U24.9alpha-BHC 24.9 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U26.5alpha-Chlordane 26.5 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U26.2beta-BHC 26.2 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U797Chlordane 512 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/141630I

26.2delta-BHC 26.2 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U42.8Dieldrin 42.8 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U35.3Endosulfan I 35.3 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U50.0Endosulfan II 50.0 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U47.7Endosulfan Sulfate 47.7 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U59.4Endrin 59.4 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U47.7Endrin Aldehyde 47.7 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U38.4Endrin Ketone 38.4 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U51.2gamma-BHC (Lindane) 51.2 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U63.8gamma-Chlordane 26.2 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3I51.2Heptachlor 51.2 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U40.9Heptachlor Epoxide 40.9 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/1481.3U34.7Methoxychlor 34.7 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/14163U614Toxaphene 614 5 02/14/14 20:30 2/4/141630U


Analytical Report



J1400688-002Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS2


01/24/14 09:23

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-002Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS2


01/24/14 09:23

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


434Aroclor 1016 434 5 02/12/14 17:39 2/4/141580U320Aroclor 1221 320 5 02/12/14 17:39 2/4/141580U

1040Aroclor 1232 1040 5 02/12/14 17:39 2/4/141580U426Aroclor 1242 426 5 02/12/14 17:39 2/4/141580U769Aroclor 1248 769 5 02/12/14 17:39 2/4/141580U582Aroclor 1254 582 5 02/12/14 17:39 2/4/141580U445Aroclor 1260 445 5 02/12/14 17:39 2/4/141580U


Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 09:23


Basis: As Received


Sample Name: MS2

Lab Code: J1400688-002



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 21:36 02/07/1410.040.10I0.066010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:36 02/07/1410.0030.10I0.036010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:36 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:36 02/07/1410.0050.10U0.0056010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 21:36 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:37 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:36 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 21:35 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



J1400688-003Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS3


01/24/14 11:25

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


24.91-Methylnaphthalene 24.9 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.2U21.22-Methylnaphthalene 21.2 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.2U28.5Acenaphthene 28.5 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1462.5U20.3Acenaphthylene 20.3 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1462.5U14.8Anthracene 14.8 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.2U91.1Benz(a)anthracene 17.5 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.2353Benzo(a)pyrene 18.4 10 02/07/14 04:25 2/6/1462.5463Benzo(b)fluoranthene 36.8 10 02/07/14 04:25 2/6/1462.589.4Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 40.5 10 02/07/14 04:25 2/6/1462.5104Benzo(k)fluoranthene 44.2 10 02/07/14 04:25 2/6/1462.5168Chrysene 17.5 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.249.7Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 49.7 10 02/07/14 04:25 2/6/1462.5U246Fluoranthene 18.4 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.220.3Fluorene 20.3 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.2U96.4Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 40.5 10 02/07/14 04:25 2/6/1462.528.5Naphthalene 28.5 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.2U41.1Phenanthrene 15.7 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1462.5I231Pyrene 18.4 5 02/06/14 08:05 2/6/1431.2


Analytical Report



J1400688-003Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS3


01/24/14 11:25

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


10.84,4'-DDD 10.8 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U11.94,4'-DDE 11.9 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U17.94,4'-DDT 17.9 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U11.9Aldrin 11.9 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U8.27alpha-BHC 8.27 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U8.80alpha-Chlordane 8.80 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U8.70beta-BHC 8.70 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U171Chlordane 171 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/14541U

8.70delta-BHC 8.70 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U14.2Dieldrin 14.2 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U11.8Endosulfan I 11.8 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U16.6Endosulfan II 16.6 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U15.9Endosulfan Sulfate 15.9 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U19.8Endrin 19.8 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U15.9Endrin Aldehyde 15.9 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U12.8Endrin Ketone 12.8 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U17.1gamma-BHC (Lindane) 17.1 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U8.70gamma-Chlordane 8.70 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U17.1Heptachlor 17.1 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U13.6Heptachlor Epoxide 13.6 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1427.0U11.6Methoxychlor 11.6 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/1454.1U204Toxaphene 204 5 02/14/14 20:55 2/4/14541U


Analytical Report



J1400688-003Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS3


01/24/14 11:25

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-003Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS3


01/24/14 11:25

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:




Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 11:25


Basis: As Received


Sample Name: MS3

Lab Code: J1400688-003



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 21:41 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:41 02/07/1410.0030.10I0.026010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:41 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:41 02/07/1410.0050.10U0.0056010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 21:41 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:39 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:41 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 21:40 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



J1400688-004Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS4


01/24/14 14:10

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


90.01-Methylnaphthalene 90.0 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113U76.72-Methylnaphthalene 76.7 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113U104Acenaphthene 104 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14227U73.4Acenaphthylene 73.4 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14227U102Anthracene 53.4 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113I696Benz(a)anthracene 63.4 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113

2110Benzo(a)pyrene 66.7 10 02/07/14 04:46 2/6/142273990Benzo(b)fluoranthene 134 10 02/07/14 04:46 2/6/142271780Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 147 10 02/07/14 04:46 2/6/142271040Benzo(k)fluoranthene 160 10 02/07/14 04:46 2/6/142271630Chrysene 63.4 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113180Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 180 10 02/07/14 04:46 2/6/14227U

2190Fluoranthene 66.7 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/1411373.4Fluorene 73.4 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113U

1850Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 147 10 02/07/14 04:46 2/6/14227104Naphthalene 104 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113U348Phenanthrene 56.7 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14227

2220Pyrene 66.7 5 02/06/14 08:25 2/6/14113

Surrogate Name Q% Rec Control Limits Date Analyzed2-Fluorobiphenyl 02/06/14 08:2530 - 11826 *p-Terphenyl-d14 02/06/14 08:2541 - 14626 *

Analytical Report



J1400688-004Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS4


01/24/14 14:10

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


41.14,4'-DDD 41.1 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U45.44,4'-DDE 45.4 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U68.34,4'-DDT 68.3 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U45.5Aldrin 45.5 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U31.8alpha-BHC 31.8 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U33.8alpha-Chlordane 33.8 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U33.4beta-BHC 33.4 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U653Chlordane 653 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/142070U

33.4delta-BHC 33.4 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U54.5Dieldrin 54.5 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U44.9Endosulfan I 44.9 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U63.7Endosulfan II 63.7 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U60.8Endosulfan Sulfate 60.8 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U75.7Endrin 75.7 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U60.8Endrin Aldehyde 60.8 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U49.0Endrin Ketone 49.0 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U65.3gamma-BHC (Lindane) 65.3 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U33.4gamma-Chlordane 33.4 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U65.3Heptachlor 65.3 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U52.1Heptachlor Epoxide 52.1 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14104U44.2Methoxychlor 44.2 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/14207U783Toxaphene 783 5 02/14/14 21:20 2/4/142070U


Analytical Report



J1400688-004Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS4


01/24/14 14:10

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-004Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS4


01/24/14 14:10

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 14:10


Basis: As Received


Sample Name: MS4

Lab Code: J1400688-004



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 21:45 02/07/1410.040.10I0.066010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:45 02/07/1410.0030.10I0.036010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:45 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:45 02/07/1410.0050.10U0.0056010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 21:45 02/07/1410.040.10I0.096010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:40 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:45 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 21:45 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



J1400688-005Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS5


01/24/14 12:25

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


79.91-Methylnaphthalene 79.9 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101U68.12-Methylnaphthalene 68.1 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101U91.7Acenaphthene 91.7 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14201U65.1Acenaphthylene 65.1 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14201U47.4Anthracene 47.4 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101U305Benz(a)anthracene 56.2 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101

1210Benzo(a)pyrene 59.2 10 02/07/14 05:06 2/6/142011840Benzo(b)fluoranthene 119 10 02/07/14 05:06 2/6/14201565Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 131 10 02/07/14 05:06 2/6/14201413Benzo(k)fluoranthene 142 10 02/07/14 05:06 2/6/14201604Chrysene 56.2 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101160Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 160 10 02/07/14 05:06 2/6/14201U986Fluoranthene 59.2 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/1410165.1Fluorene 65.1 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101U604Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 131 10 02/07/14 05:06 2/6/1420191.7Naphthalene 91.7 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101U121Phenanthrene 50.3 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14201I893Pyrene 59.2 5 02/06/14 08:45 2/6/14101


Analytical Report



J1400688-005Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS5


01/24/14 12:25

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:



30.6delta-BHC 30.6 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U49.9Dieldrin 49.9 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U41.1Endosulfan I 41.1 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U58.3Endosulfan II 58.3 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U55.6Endosulfan Sulfate 55.6 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U69.2Endrin 69.2 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U55.7Endrin Aldehyde 55.7 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U44.8Endrin Ketone 44.8 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U59.8gamma-BHC (Lindane) 59.8 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U30.6gamma-Chlordane 30.6 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U59.8Heptachlor 59.8 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U47.7Heptachlor Epoxide 47.7 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/1494.9U40.5Methoxychlor 40.5 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/14190U716Toxaphene 716 5 02/14/14 21:45 2/4/141900U


Analytical Report



J1400688-005Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS5


01/24/14 12:25

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-005Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS5


01/24/14 12:25

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 12:25


Basis: As Received


Sample Name: MS5

Lab Code: J1400688-005



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 21:50 02/07/1410.040.10I0.046010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:50 02/07/1410.0030.10I0.016010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:50 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:50 02/07/1410.0050.10I0.016010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 21:50 02/07/1410.040.10I0.046010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:44 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:50 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 21:50 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



J1400688-006Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS6


01/24/14 13:04

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


50.21-Methylnaphthalene 50.2 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2U42.82-Methylnaphthalene 42.8 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2U57.6Acenaphthene 57.6 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/14126U40.9Acenaphthylene 40.9 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/14126U29.8Anthracene 29.8 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2U51.6Benz(a)anthracene 35.4 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2I472Benzo(a)pyrene 37.2 10 02/07/14 05:26 2/6/14126392Benzo(b)fluoranthene 74.4 10 02/07/14 05:26 2/6/1412681.8Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 81.8 10 02/07/14 05:26 2/6/14126U89.2Benzo(k)fluoranthene 89.2 10 02/07/14 05:26 2/6/14126U53.0Chrysene 35.4 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2I101Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 101 10 02/07/14 05:26 2/6/14126U88.1Fluoranthene 37.2 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.240.9Fluorene 40.9 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2U81.8Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 81.8 10 02/07/14 05:26 2/6/14126U57.6Naphthalene 57.6 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2U31.6Phenanthrene 31.6 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/14126U89.2Pyrene 37.2 5 02/06/14 09:05 2/6/1463.2


Analytical Report



J1400688-006Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS6


01/24/14 13:04

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-006Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS6


01/24/14 13:04

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-006Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS6


01/24/14 13:04

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:




Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 13:04


Basis: As Received


Sample Name: MS6

Lab Code: J1400688-006



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 22:04 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:04 02/07/1410.0030.10I0.056010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:04 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:04 02/07/1410.0050.10U0.0056010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 22:04 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:45 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:04 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 22:03 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



J1400688-007Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS7


01/24/14 13:20

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


47.91-Methylnaphthalene 47.9 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.2U40.82-Methylnaphthalene 40.8 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.2U55.0Acenaphthene 55.0 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/14120U39.0Acenaphthylene 39.0 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/14120U28.4Anthracene 28.4 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.2U84.8Benz(a)anthracene 33.7 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.235.5Benzo(a)pyrene 35.5 10 02/07/14 05:46 2/6/14120U569Benzo(b)fluoranthene 70.9 10 02/07/14 05:46 2/6/1412078.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 78.0 10 02/07/14 05:46 2/6/14120U87.3Benzo(k)fluoranthene 85.1 10 02/07/14 05:46 2/6/14120I135Chrysene 33.7 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.295.7Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 95.7 10 02/07/14 05:46 2/6/14120U231Fluoranthene 35.5 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.239.0Fluorene 39.0 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.2U78.0Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 78.0 10 02/07/14 05:46 2/6/14120U71.3Naphthalene 55.0 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.245.5Phenanthrene 30.2 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/14120I226Pyrene 35.5 5 02/06/14 09:25 2/6/1460.2


Analytical Report



J1400688-007Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS7


01/24/14 13:20

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-007Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS7


01/24/14 13:20

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-007Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS7


01/24/14 13:20

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:




Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 13:20


Basis: As Received


Sample Name: MS7

Lab Code: J1400688-007



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 22:23 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:23 02/07/1410.0030.10I0.036010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:23 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:23 02/07/1410.0050.10I0.046010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 22:23 02/07/1410.040.10I0.046010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:46 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:23 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 22:23 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



J1400688-008Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS8


01/24/14 13:50

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


23.21-Methylnaphthalene 23.2 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.2U19.82-Methylnaphthalene 19.8 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.2U26.7Acenaphthene 26.7 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1458.4U19.0Acenaphthylene 19.0 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1458.4U13.8Anthracene 13.8 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.2U26.7Benz(a)anthracene 16.4 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.2I17.2Benzo(a)pyrene 17.2 10 02/07/14 06:06 2/6/1458.4U211Benzo(b)fluoranthene 34.4 10 02/07/14 06:06 2/6/1458.437.9Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 37.9 10 02/07/14 06:06 2/6/1458.4U41.3Benzo(k)fluoranthene 41.3 10 02/07/14 06:06 2/6/1458.4U35.7Chrysene 16.4 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.246.4Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 46.4 10 02/07/14 06:06 2/6/1458.4U67.3Fluoranthene 17.2 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.219.0Fluorene 19.0 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.2U37.9Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 37.9 10 02/07/14 06:06 2/6/1458.4U26.7Naphthalene 26.7 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.2U14.7Phenanthrene 14.7 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1458.4U58.9Pyrene 17.2 5 02/06/14 09:45 2/6/1429.2


Analytical Report



J1400688-008Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS8


01/24/14 13:50

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:



7.69delta-BHC 7.69 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U12.6Dieldrin 12.6 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U10.4Endosulfan I 10.4 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U14.7Endosulfan II 14.7 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U14.0Endosulfan Sulfate 14.0 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U17.5Endrin 17.5 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U14.1Endrin Aldehyde 14.1 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U11.3Endrin Ketone 11.3 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U15.1gamma-BHC (Lindane) 15.1 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U7.69gamma-Chlordane 7.69 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U15.1Heptachlor 15.1 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U12.0Heptachlor Epoxide 12.0 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1423.9U10.2Methoxychlor 10.2 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/1447.8U181Toxaphene 181 5 02/14/14 23:01 2/4/14478U


Analytical Report



J1400688-008Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS8


01/24/14 13:50

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report



J1400688-008Lab Code:

Sample Name: MS8


01/24/14 13:50

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


128Aroclor 1016 128 5 02/12/14 20:05 2/4/14464U93.9Aroclor 1221 93.9 5 02/12/14 20:05 2/4/14464U304Aroclor 1232 304 5 02/12/14 20:05 2/4/14464U125Aroclor 1242 125 5 02/12/14 20:05 2/4/14464U226Aroclor 1248 226 5 02/12/14 20:05 2/4/14464U171Aroclor 1254 171 5 02/12/14 20:05 2/4/14464U131Aroclor 1260 131 5 02/12/14 20:05 2/4/14464U


Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14 09:55

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14 13:50


Basis: As Received


Sample Name: MS8

Lab Code: J1400688-008



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 22:28 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:28 02/07/1410.0030.10I0.026010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:28 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:28 02/07/1410.0050.10I0.016010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 22:28 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:47 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 22:28 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 22:28 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



JQ1400897-01Lab Code:

Sample Name: Method Blank


NA

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



NA

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


2.701-Methylnaphthalene 2.70 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.302-Methylnaphthalene 2.30 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U3.10Acenaphthene 3.10 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/146.80U2.20Acenaphthylene 2.20 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/146.80U1.60Anthracene 1.60 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U1.90Benz(a)anthracene 1.90 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U1.00Benzo(a)pyrene 1.00 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.00Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2.00 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2.20 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.40Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2.40 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U1.90Chrysene 1.90 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.70Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.70 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.00Fluoranthene 2.00 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.20Fluorene 2.20 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U2.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2.20 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U3.10Naphthalene 3.10 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U1.70Phenanthrene 1.70 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/146.80U2.00Pyrene 2.00 1 02/06/14 06:05 2/6/143.40U


Analytical Report






NA

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



NA

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


0.6744,4'-DDD 0.674 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.7434,4'-DDE 0.743 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U1.124,4'-DDT 1.12 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U

0.745Aldrin 0.745 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.520alpha-BHC 0.520 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.553alpha-Chlordane 0.553 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.547beta-BHC 0.547 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U10.7Chlordane 10.7 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/1434.0U

0.547delta-BHC 0.547 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.893Dieldrin 0.893 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.736Endosulfan I 0.736 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U1.05Endosulfan II 1.05 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U

0.996Endosulfan Sulfate 0.996 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U1.24Endrin 1.24 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U

0.997Endrin Aldehyde 0.997 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.802Endrin Ketone 0.802 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U1.07gamma-BHC (Lindane) 1.07 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U

0.547gamma-Chlordane 0.547 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U1.07Heptachlor 1.07 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U

0.853Heptachlor Epoxide 0.853 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/141.70U0.724Methoxychlor 0.724 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/143.40U12.9Toxaphene 12.9 1 02/14/14 19:15 2/4/1434.0U


Analytical Report






NA

As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:





NA

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:





Analytical Report






NA

Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:



NA

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


9.06Aroclor 1016 9.06 1 02/12/14 15:37 2/4/1433.0U6.68Aroclor 1221 6.68 1 02/12/14 15:37 2/4/1433.0U21.6Aroclor 1232 21.6 1 02/12/14 15:37 2/4/1433.0U8.89Aroclor 1242 8.89 1 02/12/14 15:37 2/4/1433.0U16.1Aroclor 1248 16.1 1 02/12/14 15:37 2/4/1433.0U12.2Aroclor 1254 12.2 1 02/12/14 15:37 2/4/1433.0U9.30Aroclor 1260 9.30 1 02/12/14 15:37 2/4/1433.0U


Analytical Report



Client:

NA

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: NA


Basis: As Received



Lab Code: J1400688-MB1



Arsenic, TCLP 02/07/14 21:22 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LBarium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:22 02/07/1410.0030.10U0.0036010B mg/LCadmium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:22 02/07/1410.0020.050U0.0026010B mg/LChromium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:22 02/07/1410.0050.10U0.0056010B mg/LLead, TCLP 02/07/14 21:22 02/07/1410.040.10U0.046010B mg/LMercury, TCLP 02/10/14 14:34 02/07/1410.00100.0010U0.00107470A mg/LSelenium, TCLP 02/07/14 21:22 02/07/1410.070.10U0.076010B mg/LSilver, TCLP 02/07/14 21:22 02/07/1410.020.10U0.026010B mg/L

Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14

Carbon, Total Organic (TOC)

Basis:

Units: mg/Kg

Dry

9060MAnalysis Method:

Lab CodeSample NameDate

AnalyzedDil.MDLMRLResult Q

MS1 02/10/14 09:3614400440080100J1400688-001

MS2 02/10/14 09:45185008500168000J1400688-002

MS3 02/10/14 09:5412800280024400J1400688-003

MS4 02/10/14 10:05191009100115000J1400688-004

MS5 02/10/14 10:18186008600140000J1400688-005

MS6 02/10/14 10:2916100610083100J1400688-006

MS7 02/10/14 10:5214900490053300J1400688-007

MS8 02/10/14 11:001200020008300J1400688-008

Method Blank 02/10/14 09:191500500U500J1400688-MB

Analytical Report



Client:

01/28/14

J1400688

Date Received:

Date Collected:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project: 01/24/14

Solids, Total

Basis:

Units: Percent

As Received

160.3 ModifiedAnalysis Method:

Lab CodeSample NameDate

AnalyzedDil.MDLMRLResult Q

MS1 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1039J1400688-001

MS2 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1016J1400688-002

MS3 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1053J1400688-003

MS4 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1015J1400688-004

MS5 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1016J1400688-005

MS6 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1027J1400688-006

MS7 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1029J1400688-007

MS8 01/31/14 10:0010.100.1058J1400688-008

Analytical Report



30 - 118

Analysis Method: 8270C SIM

Extraction Method: EPA 3546

Sample Name Lab Code

2-Fluorobiphenyl p-Terphenyl-d14

SURROGATE RECOVERY SUMMARY

41 - 146


MS1 J1400688-001 4434

MS2 J1400688-002 8558

MS3 J1400688-003 7167

MS4 J1400688-004 26 *26 *

MS5 J1400688-005 5733

MS6 J1400688-006 4142

MS7 J1400688-007 4245

MS8 J1400688-008 6767

Method Blank JQ1400897-01 7855

Lab Control Sample JQ1400897-02 8862

MS1 JQ1400897-03 7156

MS1 JQ1400897-04 6347


QA/QC Report

Client:

Project: Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix: Soil

Service Request: J1400688


14-0000277929 rev 00Superset Reference:Printed 2/17/2014 10:21:15 AM 59 of 74

QA/QC Report

ug/Kg

J1400688-001 Basis:Lab Code:

Units:Sample Name: MS1

Base Neutral Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SIMDuplicate Matrix Spike Summary

Dry

Client:

Project:

Sample Matrix:


Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2

Soil

Service Request:

Date Analyzed:

Date Received:

J1400688

02/06/14 - 02/07/14

01/28/14

Date Collected: 01/24/14

EPA 3546

8270C SIM

Prep Method:

Analysis Method:

Analyte NameRPD LimitRPDResult

Sample Result

Spike Amount % Rec

Matrix SpikeJQ1400897-03 JQ1400897-04

Duplicate Matrix Spike

% RecSpike

AmountResult% Rec Limits


02/6/14Date Extracted:

1-Methylnaphthalene 34.1 U 96.0 168 57114 168 68 32-101 17 302-Methylnaphthalene 29.1 U 120 168 71148 168 88 32-103 21 30Acenaphthene 43.6 I 134 168 54167 168 73 29-122 22 30Acenaphthylene 27.8 U 91.6 168 54124 168 74 36-114 30 30Anthracene 168 304 168 81381 168 127 36-135 22 30Benz(a)anthracene 2180 3160 168 585 #3870 168 1006 # 43-139 20 30Benzo(a)pyrene 3460 5340 168 1116 #6080 168 1553 # 43-127 13 30Benzo(b)fluoranthene 7250 10800 168 2117 #12200 168 2952 # 49-139 12 30Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 3370 4920 168 925 #5990 168 1564 # 30-135 20 30Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2590 3550 168 571 #4300 168 1013 # 45-132 19 30Chrysene 4490 6130 168 976 #7410 168 1737 # 36-130 19 30Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 816 1520 168 420 #1900 168 647 # 32-139 22 30Fluoranthene 5790 7560 168 1055 #10500 168 2793 # 42-127 32* 30Fluorene 126 244 168 71318 168 114 41-118 26 30Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 3390 5150 168 1048 #6100 168 1612 # 32-133 17 30Naphthalene 103 203 168 59269 168 98 29-107 28 30Phenanthrene 1090 1510 168 249 #1960 168 517 # 34-130 26 30Pyrene 5800 8290 168 1482 #11200 168 3242 # 45-118 30 30

Results flagged with an asterisk (*) indicate values outside control criteria.

60 of 74

Results flagged with a pound (#) indicate the control criteria is not applicable.

Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPD) are determined by the software using values in the calculation which have not been rounded.

Printed 2/17/2014 10:21:15 AM 14-0000277929 rev 00Superset Reference:

Lab Control SampleJQ1400897-02

Analyte Name

J1400688

Date Analyzed:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:

Lab Control Sample Summary


Analysis Method:

Prep Method:

8270C SIM

EPA 3546 Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:

Analysis Lot: 379335

02/06/14

Spike AmountResult % Rec % Rec Limits


dba ALS EnvironmentalALS Group USA, Corp.

QA/QC Report

1-Methylnaphthalene 32-1016266.741.52-Methylnaphthalene 32-1036366.742.3Acenaphthene 29-1226566.743.4Acenaphthylene 36-1145866.738.8Anthracene 36-1357166.747.3Benz(a)anthracene 43-1398066.753.0Benzo(a)pyrene 43-1278666.757.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene 49-1399366.762.2Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 30-1358566.756.8Benzo(k)fluoranthene 45-1329266.761.3Chrysene 36-1308366.755.5Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 32-1399866.765.0Fluoranthene 42-1277866.752.1Fluorene 41-1187066.746.4Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 32-1339466.762.8Naphthalene 29-1075966.739.2Phenanthrene 34-1307166.747.5Pyrene 45-1188966.759.4


32 - 170

Analysis Method: 8081A

Extraction Method: EPA 3541


Decachlorobiphenyl Tetrachloro-m-xylene


10 - 147


MS1 J1400688-001 5164

MS2 J1400688-002 4689

MS3 J1400688-003 7069

MS4 J1400688-004 6170

MS5 J1400688-005 6266

MS6 J1400688-006 95104

MS7 J1400688-007 6669

MS8 J1400688-008 9070




QA/QC Report

Client:



Sample Matrix: Soil




10 - 290

Analysis Method: 8081A

Extraction Method: EPA 3510C


Decachlorobiphenyl Tetrachloro-m-xylene


23 - 125


MS1 J1400688-001 8699

MS2 J1400688-002 8998

MS3 J1400688-003 7380

MS4 J1400688-004 94118

MS5 J1400688-005 9083

MS6 J1400688-006 8987

MS7 J1400688-007 9185

MS8 J1400688-008 7876




QA/QC Report

Client:



Sample Matrix: Soil




10 - 258

Analysis Method: 8082

Extraction Method: EPA 3550B


Decachlorobiphenyl



MS1 J1400688-001 45

MS2 J1400688-002 40

MS3 J1400688-003 79

MS4 J1400688-004 79

MS5 J1400688-005 49

MS6 J1400688-006 76

MS7 J1400688-007 60

MS8 J1400688-008 99



MS1 JQ1400811-04 41

MS1 JQ1400811-05 45


QA/QC Report

Client:



Sample Matrix: Soil




QA/QC Report

ug/Kg



Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GCDuplicate Matrix Spike Summary

Dry

Client:

Project:

Sample Matrix:


Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2

Soil

Service Request:

Date Analyzed:

Date Received:

J1400688

02/12/14

01/28/14

Date Collected: 01/24/14

EPA 3550B

8082

Prep Method:

Analysis Method:

Analyte NameRPD LimitRPDResult

Sample Result

Spike Amount % Rec

Matrix SpikeJQ1400811-04 JQ1400811-05


% RecSpike

AmountResult% Rec Limits



Aroclor 1016 194 U 540 1150 47540 1140 47 28-149 <1 30Aroclor 1260 199 U 604 1150 52584 1140 51 10-176 3 30


65 of 74





Analyte Name

J1400688

Date Analyzed:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:



Analysis Method:

Prep Method:

8081A

EPA 3550B Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:


02/14/14




QA/QC Report

4,4'-DDD 28-1209026.723.94,4'-DDE 47-1168826.723.64,4'-DDT 39-1356226.716.6Aldrin 43-1108426.722.3alpha-BHC 42-1038826.723.4alpha-Chlordane 45-1148526.722.7beta-BHC 43-1179926.726.5delta-BHC 46-1139126.724.2Dieldrin 41-1188926.723.8Endosulfan I 45-1168426.722.5Endosulfan II 43-1209426.725.1Endosulfan Sulfate 48-1157926.721.2Endrin 49-11110226.727.2Endrin Aldehyde 29-1226726.717.9Endrin Ketone 44-1229326.724.9gamma-BHC (Lindane) 40-1068326.722.1gamma-Chlordane 46-1148726.723.3Heptachlor 39-1158826.723.5Heptachlor Epoxide 41-1178526.722.7Methoxychlor 32-1336926.718.5



Analyte Name

J1400688

Date Analyzed:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:



Analysis Method:

Prep Method:

8081A

EPA 3510C As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:


02/11/14




QA/QC Report

Endrin, TCLP 24-141900.004000.00361gamma-BHC (Lindane), TCLP 26-114770.004000.00307Heptachlor Epoxide, TCLP 30-124780.004000.00313Heptachlor, TCLP 27-119840.004000.00334Methoxychlor, TCLP 18-153940.004000.00378



Analyte Name

J1400688

Date Analyzed:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:



Analysis Method:

Prep Method:

8082

EPA 3550B Dry

ug/Kg

Basis:

Units:


02/12/14




QA/QC Report

Aroclor 1016 28-14970267186Aroclor 1260 10-17672267191



QA/QC Report

Analyte Name

mg/L



Inorganic ParametersDuplicate Matrix Spike Summary

Client:

Project:

Sample Matrix:


Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2

Soil

Service Request:

Date Analyzed:

Date Received:

J1400688

2/7/14

01/28/14

Date Collected:01/24/14

As Received

RPD LimitRPDResult

Sample Result

Spike Amount % Rec

Matrix SpikeJ1400688-006DMSJ1400688-006MS


% RecSpike

AmountResult% Rec LimitsMethod


Arsenic, TCLP 0.04 5.24 5.00 1055.21 5.00 104 75-125 <1 206010BBarium, TCLP 0.05 5.08 5.00 1015.14 5.00 102 75-125 1 206010BCadmium, TCLP 0.002 2.58 2.50 1032.58 2.50 103 75-125 <1 206010BChromium, TCLP 0.005 5.04 5.00 1015.03 5.00 101 75-125 <1 206010BLead, TCLP 0.04 5.25 5.00 1055.20 5.00 104 75-125 <1 206010BSelenium, TCLP 0.07 5.41 5.00 1085.39 5.00 108 75-125 <1 206010BSilver, TCLP 0.02 5.23 5.00 1055.30 5.00 106 75-125 1 206010B


69 of 74




Analyte Name

J1400688

Date Analyzed:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:



As Received

mg/L

Basis:

Units:

Lab Control Sample

J1400688-LCS

02/07/14 - 02/10/14

Spike AmountResult % Rec % Rec LimitsAnalytical Method


QA/QC Report

Arsenic, TCLP 80-1201035.005.166010B

Barium, TCLP 80-1201005.004.986010B

Cadmium, TCLP 80-1201022.502.546010B

Chromium, TCLP 80-120995.004.966010B

Lead, TCLP 80-1201015.005.056010B

Mercury, TCLP 80-1201020.01250.01277470A

Selenium, TCLP 80-1201055.005.266010B

Silver, TCLP 80-1201035.005.166010B

14-0000277929 rev 00Superset Reference:Printed 2/17/2014 10:21:15 AM70 of 74


QA/QC Report

Client:

Project

Sample Matrix: Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. Service Request: J1400688

01/24/14Date Collected:

Date Received: 01/28/14

01/31/14Date Analyzed:

Replicate Sample Summary

General Chemistry Parameters

MS1 Percent

Basis:

Units:

J1400688-001 As ReceivedLab Code:

Sample Name:

RPD LimitMRL MDLAnalysis Method RPD

Duplicate Sample

J1400688-001DUP Result Average

SampleResultAnalyte Name


Solids, Total 20.10 0.10 39 39 39.0 20160.3 Modified





Sample Name

J1400688

Date Analyzed:

Service Request:

Soil

Lake Manor/6063130233.2.2


Sample Matrix:

Project:

Client:


Carbon, Total Organic (TOC)

Analysis Method: 9060M

Dry

mg/Kg

Basis:

Units:


02/10/14

Spike AmountResult % Rec

% Rec LimitsLab Code


QA/QC Report

Lab Control Sample 85-11592100009190J1400688-LCS


73 of 74

74 of 74

Exhibit C - 15-005

CITY HALL, 735 8TH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, …dnhiggins.com/docs/15-005 Addendum 2.pdf · Juncus sp....

Documents

Transcript of CITY HALL, 735 8TH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, …dnhiggins.com/docs/15-005 Addendum 2.pdf · Juncus sp....