Pablo Guerrero, Iliya Gurov , Kristof Van Laerhoven , Alejandro Buchmann
Cindy Kristof Kent State University · Friday, January 24, 2014 Cindy Kristof Kent State University...
Transcript of Cindy Kristof Kent State University · Friday, January 24, 2014 Cindy Kristof Kent State University...
“The Congress shall have the power…to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”
United States Constitution
Article 1, Section 8
Title 17, United States Code ◦ Grants a set of exclusive rights to copyright
owners for a limited period of time
◦ Exclusive rights are balanced with exceptions
◦ http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
United States Patent & Trademark Office ◦ http://www.uspto.gov/patents/
Patents ◦ Types
Utility – invention or discovery of a new and useful process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter
Design - invents a new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture
Plant – green, growing things ◦ Term -
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/law/patent_term_calculator.jsp
Trademarks (or service mark) ◦ Terms – do not run out; file all post registration maintenance
documents ◦ Types
Registered - ® Unregistered - ™
Copyright Law gives copyright holders a limited monopoly over their works, to serve as an incentive for authors and creators. The rights include the following:
1. Reproduce the work in copies 2. Distribute the work publicly 3. Make derivative works 4. Publicly display the work 5. Public performance 6. Public performance by means of a digital audio
transmission
(Source: § 106, Title 17 U.S. Code at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/)
Fair Use – Section 107
Reproduction by Libraries and Archives – Section 108
First Sale – Section 109
Exemption of certain performances and displays (including classroom use and the TEACH Act) – Section 110
Reproduction for blind or other people with disabilities – Section 121
Allows us to make book trees for the holidays
Allows us to borrow and lend “returnables” ◦ Books
◦ Theses and dissertations
◦ Microforms
◦ Videos
◦ DVDs
◦ CDs
◦ Whole issues or bound volumes of journals
◦ Applies to materials that are purchased and not licensed
Section 108 (d) ◦ The copy becomes the property of the user
◦ Library has had no notice that the copy will be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research
◦ Library displays prominently, at the place where orders are accepted, and includes on its order form, a warning of copyright.
Section 108 Spinner ◦ http://www.librarycopyright.net/108spinner/
Notice: Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States
Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material.
Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement.
This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
“Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works” ◦ Group of publishers, librarians, teachers, and other
stakeholders
Pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976 ◦ Final Report – 1978
http://digital-law-online.info/CONTU/PDF/index.html
Chapter 4 - Guidelines on Photocopying under Interlibrary Loan Arrangements
(Not to be confused with CONFU, which took place in the 1990‟s)
Provides clarification for Section 108
Attempts to answer: 1. What “... aggregate quantities…substitute for a
subscription to or purchase of [a] work”? §108(g)(2)
2. What constitutes “systematic reproduction”?
Attempts to mitigate the effects of library subscription patterns on market and sales
5/5 Suggestion (or, Suggestion of Five, or Rule of Five, or 5/5 Rule) ◦ For the BORROWING library to track
Applies only to articles published fewer than five years before date of request
Requesting and receiving six or more articles from a single journal title in a calendar year exceeds this suggestion.
All ILL photocopy requests must include a copyright compliance statement by the BORROWING library ◦ CCG – “Compliance CONTU Guidelines”
ILL request complies with 108 (g) (2) Guidelines
Subject to the 5/5 Suggestion
◦ CCL – “Compliance Copyright Law” ILL request complies with other provision of copyright
law
Falls outside the years of the 5/5 Suggestion
Clearance for textual works since 1978 ◦ http://www.copyright.com ◦ For ILL
Pay royalties on “CCG” photocopies that exceed the 5/5 Suggestion ILL transactions fall under Pay Per Use Options
Not all publishers work with the Copyright Clearance Center Journal of Gang Research
http://www.ngcrc.com/ngcrc/page2.htm
Get It Now service http://www.copyright.com/content/cc3/en/toolbar/produ
ctsAndSolutions/getitnow.html
Choices for the SIXTH article, or beyond… ◦ Check with and pay through CCC - copyright.com
Get It Now Service ◦ Order a copy of the article from a copyright-cleared
commercial source… British Library Document Supply Services
◦ Purchase a copy of the article from the publisher‟s web site
◦ Purchase the entire issue ◦ Start a subscription to the journal ◦ Borrow the entire issue (or bound volume ◦ Refer the patron to a nearby library that has the journal ◦ Refuse the order/Close the title ◦ Evaluate for possible Fair Use
Check for use of CCG or CCL Include copyright statement on copies
provided ◦ Copy the copyright statement on the piece (1998
DMCA change) If you cannot locate it, use the good ole “stamp”
Articles being delivered electronically have an “electronic stamp”
“Notice: This material is subject to the U.S. Copyright Law; further reproduction in violation of that law is prohibited.” (Gasaway-Wiant wording)
If your intended reproduction or use is not covered by Section 108 (or any other section of the U.S. Copyright Law), it may still be lawful under Fair Use.
Fair Use is used as a defense in U.S. courts of law.
Four Factors of Fair Use 1. Purpose & Character of Use
– e.g., non-profit vs. for-profit
2. Nature of Work – e.g., factual vs. creative; published vs. unpublished
3. Amount & Substantiality of Work – e.g., small portion vs. large portion or “heart” of work
4. Effect of Use – e.g., little effect on market vs. huge impact on market
value
Checklist ◦ http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/fair-
use/fair-use-checklist/
Evaluator ◦ http://librarycopyright.net/resources/fairuse/
Fair Use evaluations do NOT carry the weight of a legal decision or substitute for the advice of an attorney
Keep records of your Fair Use evaluations
Some materials are born into the Public Domain
What‟s now in the Public Domain? ◦ http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm
Date of publication before 1923
Life of the author + 70 years
Works made for hire – 120 years from date of creation
Variances are due to changes in U.S. Copyright Law over time
Re-copyright…Public Domain cannot be assumed to be permanent ◦ Golan v. Holder – Decided January 12, 2012
Supreme Court ruled that “limited time” does not preclude restoring items once in the public domain to protected status
Berne Convention
Costco v. Omega ◦ http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/costco-v-
omega/ “An equally divided Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's holding that
the „first sale‟ doctrine applies only to copyrighted items that are made and distributed in the United States.”
Kirtsaeng v. Wiley ◦ http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/kirtsaeng-
v-john-wiley-sons-inc/ “The „first sale‟ doctrine, which allows the owner of a
copyrighted work to sell or otherwise dispose of that copy as he wishes, applies to copies of a copyrighted work lawfully made abroad.”
“Copyright © 2005 by the
Association for Computing
Machinery (ACM). Permission to
make digital or hard copies of all
or part of this work for personal
or classroom use is granted
without fee provided that copies
are not made or distributed for
profit or commercial advantage
and that copies bear this notice
and the full citation on the first
page. Copyrights for components
of this work owned by others than
ACM must be honored.”
“Copyright © 2012, THE CLAY
MINERALS SOCIETY. Individual
readers of this JOURNAL, and
nonprofit libraries acting in their behalf,
are freely permitted to make fair use of
the material in it, such as to copy an
article for use in teaching or research.
Authorization to photocopy items for
internal or personal use, or the internal
and personal use of specific clients, or
for educational classroom use, is
granted by THE CLAY MINERALS
SOCIETY provided that the
appropriate fee is paid directly to the
Copyright Clearance Center.”
“Copyright © 2011, Informa Healthcare
USA, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
of this publication may be reproduced,
stored, transmitted, or disseminated,
in any form, or by any means, without
prior written permission from Informa
Healthcare USA, Inc, to whom all
requests to reproduce copyright
material should be directed, in writing.”
Berne Convention – ◦ Supports International Interlibrary Loan
◦ 1886 – originally signed in Switzerland
◦ 1988 – United States joined
◦ All members of the European Union are also current signatories
◦ Many countries‟ laws still only partially conform
◦ “Harmonization”
IFLA‟s International Resource Sharing and Document Delivery: Principles and Guidelines for Procedure
◦ 1954
◦ revised in February 2009
◦ Copyright is number six of eight guidelines
IFLA Position on Copyright in the Digital Environment
◦ “Digital is no different…”
◦ “Contractual provisions, for example within licensing agreements, should not override reasonable lending of electronic resources by library and information staff.”
Statement by the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) on Document Delivery ◦ http://www.stm-assoc.org/industry-news/stm-statement-on-
document-delivery/ Gives lipservice to the Berne Convention 3‐step test
Asserts that international document delivery should be negotiated directly with publishers; that digital document delivery should be governed and coordinated by rights‐holders; that even for “private, non‐commercial use,” it should be subject to “appropriate due diligence”; and that on‐site print delivery is a good compromise.
Kevin Smith‟s blog – “A second front” ◦ http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2011/06/09/a-
second-front/
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Georgia State Ereserves Case ◦ AKA Cambridge University Press v. Becker ◦ Court ruled most were Fair Use ◦ Publishers (Oxford, Cambridge, Sage) appealed in May
2013; we await.
HathiTrust ◦ AKA Authors Guild v. HathiTrust ◦ U.S. District Court New York upheld Fair Use –
“transformative use,” October 2012
Google Books Search Case ◦ AKA Authors Guild v. Google ◦ U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York
upheld Fair Use, November 2013
Communicate with your acquisitions folks, ask for what you want…
But be understanding…ILL rights are just a portion of the negotiation process
You want: ◦ ILL lending rights ◦ Rights to deliver items through current electronic
delivery systems
You don‟t want: ◦ Print-only ILL rights (better than nothing?) ◦ Required record-keeping beyond requirements of §
108 and CONTU
Is the material within public domain?
Is the material licensed for your purpose?
Is your use permitted by law? ◦ Section 108
Does your use fall within agreed-upon guidelines? ◦ CONTU
Could you make a case for Fair Use? ◦ Section 107
Copyright Crash Course – Interlibrary Loan ◦ http://copyright.lib.utexas.edu/l-108g.html
Columbia University – Interlibrary Loan ◦ http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/libraries-and-
copyright/interlibrary-loan/
Section 108 Spinner ◦ http://librarycopyright.net/resources/spinner/
Public Domain Chart ◦ http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm
Fair Use Checklist ◦ http://copyright.columbia.edu/copyright/fair-use/fair-
use-checklist/
Supreme Court ◦ http://www.scotusblog.com/