CIMECcimec-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Osama-Al-Gazali... · 15:15 - 15:30 Osama...

CIMEC C-ITS STANDARDISATION REQUIREMENTS

FOR URBAN ENVIRONMENT

STANDARDISATION WORKSHOP (I)

12.09.2016

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 653637

2

C-ITS STANDARDISATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CITIES

WORKSHOP’S PROGRAM

Time slot Activity Moderator/presenter and (panel

members)

11:00 - 11:15 Welcome Osama Al-Gazali

11:15 - 12:00 Presentations: Regional perspectives on standardisation

1. UR:BAN: R&D-German project on cooperative ITS services, funded by

ministry of economics and energy

2. Use Case for a UK Local Authority: Improving Signals using C-ITS

Bernd Noll and

Gav Jackman

12:00 - 12:45 Presentation (two parts):

Assessment of relevant ITS/C-ITS standards

C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility

Osama Al-Gazali

12:45 - 13:00 Coffee -

13:00 - 13:45 Panel discussion (Part I): How to ensure that the list of relevant ITS/C-

ITS standards and current standardisation activities meet cities

requirements?

Josef Kaltwasser

(Fischer, Jackman, and Williams)

13:45 - 14:30 Lunch & coffee

14:30 - 15:15

Panel discussion (Part II):

Which additional standards (missing standards) may be needed to

exploit the full C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility?

Josef Kaltwasser

(Fischer, Williams and Araghi)

15:15 - 15:30 Summary and closure Osama Al-Gazali

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

ABOUT CIMEC - WP 2


Mission & Objectives

Approach

Assessment of relevant C-ITS/ITS standards

Recommendations

C-ITS POTENTIAL/EXPECTED IMPACT ON URBAN MOBILITY

Introduction

Input for panel

discussion

part (I)

Input for panel

discussion

part (II)

ABOUT CIMEC – WP 2

4

5

CIMEC…

stands for C-ITS for Mobility in European Cities

is a city-focussed project, funded by the EU HORIZON 2020 Research and Innovative

Programme, and runs from May 2015 to April 2018

Some Objectives of CIMEC are…

developing an understanding of the challenges, enablers, barriers and strategies for use of C-

ITS solutions in European cities

bridging the gap between C-ITS development and deployment through city-focused discussion

of the most relevant applications of C-ITS technology

The main output eventually is developing…

a realistic roadmap for city deployment of C-ITS, taking into account..

the goals and constrains of cities

product emergence and commercial expectations of suppliers


ABOUT CIMEC

6

WP2…

is a work package titled ‘’Potential C-ITS

solutions and standardisation for urban

environment (cities)‘’

Input for the WP 3 ‘’C-ITS roadmap‘’

It aims at …

identifying potential (current and future)

markets for cooperative ITS solutions

with specific benefits in the urban

environment,

identifying how emerging standards

for C-ITS will affect, and should

respond to, the systems and

processes in the urban environment.


ABOUT WP 2 – TASK 2.4

This workshop is contributing to

the second objective!!

C-ITS STANDARDISATION REQUIREMENTS

FOR THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT:

MISSION & OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH

7

8

This task is addresses the following questions:

how emerging standards for C-ITS will affect, and should respond to, the

systems and processes in the urban environment?

how existing and also future ITS/C-ITS standards, which are relevant for cities,

can be made transparent and understandable so that cities know where and

how to use and apply them?

Results are fed as recommendations into ITS-standardisation

organisations


MISSION

9

The addressed task…

is clarifying how C-ITS will be integrated in cities’ ITS architecture and identifying

standardisation issues that currently are not reflected. This could relate to

(sub-) systems, communication or processes. And, thereby, highlighting the

significance in relation to existing (regional) ITS standards (OCIT, OTS,

UTMC, DATEX II etc.) and urban procurement processes.

evaluates relevant ITS and C-ITS standards, e.g. the list Release 1 standards for

Cooperative ITS by CEN and ISO (N196), which have to meet cities’

requirements and ..

Provides recommendations for further standardisation as a contribution to the

work program of WG16 (C-ITS) new WG17 (Urban) of CEN278


OBJECTIVES

10


APPROACH

Task 2.4

2. Validation of the desk research in expert

workshops – phrasing of recommendations

1.1 Shortlist and assessment of existing

ITS/C-ITS standards (D 2.4)

3. Identifying further standardisation tasks

(incl. missing standards)

WP 1

City status and

(standardisation)

requirements

for C-ITS

Deployment

Phase 1 (desk research)

Phase 2 (analysis

and

conclusion)

= D2.4/2.5

1.2 Impact of C-ITS deployment on the future

urban mobility (input for step 3)

Workshop

(I)

Workshop

(II)

Release 1

(CEN/ISO)

C-ITS Platform

(WG7)

PT1701

(Final Report)

others

(e.g. TEAM

D 6.5.1)

CEN/ETSI report

on M/453

ASSESSMENT OF RELEVANT C-ITS/ITS

STANDARDS

11

12


ASSESSMENT PROCESSES

Expert judgement

Evaluated

list of

relevant

standards

Bus

prioritisation at

signalised

intersection as

supporting

example

Standards

Initial

use

cases of

WP 1

Pre-selection

13


ASSESSMENT PROCESSES: EXPERT JUDGMENT AND CRITERIA

Expert

judgement

(criteria)

Key

shortlist

of urban

ITS/C-ITS

standard

s

Standards

Release 1 by CEN/ISO (N196)

Urban ITS (PT 1701)

C-ITS Platform

Expert validation (at the workshop) Prioritised

list

1. Pre-selection 2. Pre-processing (2 rounds)

3. Prioritisation Other sources (EU projects)

CEN/ETSI report on M/453

To be discussed in the panel

discussion (part I)

14


ASSESSMENT PROCESSES: PRE-SELECTION

Pre-selection of relevant standards was based

on various existing and relevant lists of

standards

The result was then matched against the

standardisation programme for urban standardisation

that has been published by project team PT1701 as

the basis for the work program for CEN's new working

group WG17 on Urban ITS. Other relevant sources

were also cross-checked

Then, standards in this list were assessed from

an urban road operator's perspective; i.e. find

standards that road operators have to actually

work with in the process of deploying,

operating and maintaining C-ITS services

Urban

ITS C-ITS

First

step →

Second step →

15


ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

# Criteria Description

1 Interoperability with legacy system Important requirement to open up pragmatic migration paths in C-ITS

service deployment

2

Convergence with existing services

(functional)

Road Operators provide various service via multiple end user channels; new

C-ITS services will partly have overlap with existing services and Road

Operators must ensure consistency between the information provided to

end users via multiple channels

3

Consistent terminology (data dictionary /

ontology)

Consistent data structures across system boundaries are a major

requirement for system integration; new C-ITS systems have to make sure

that they fit consistently into the overall structure

4

Compliance with service policies and

business processes

Road Operators already provide services and they have their own policies

and business processes in delivering these services, defining roles and

responsibilities, etc; new C-ITS services have to fit into this scheme

5

Relevance of subject matter for public

road authority’s processes and

requirements

We want to identify standards that need to be actively addressed by the

road operator when deploying C-ITS services; technical standards (esp.

communication standards) of lower conceptual layers may be important for

systems to work, but do not need to be particularly addressed in business

processes

16


ASSESSMENT

Expert judgement

Evaluated

list of

relevant

standards

Bus

prioritisation at

signalised

intersection as

supporting

example

Standards

Initial

use

cases of

WP 1

Pre-selection

17


BUS PRIORITISATION AS EXAMPLE(2)

RECOMMENDATIONS

18

19

Standard already in use in urban ITS that need to be adapted.

Establish a suitable platform for industry-led national or regional SDOs

in charge of existing urban standards that are currently planned to be

addressed in the future on European level by an ESO to address issues

like mutual awareness, backwards compatibility, migration paths, common

cross-referencing, parallel evolution, etc.

And to keep cities informed about any conclusions drawn and explain

the future relationship between continued action of national / regional

SDOs and parallel activities on ESO level. The probability of success of

such work items in ESOs would highly benefit from the stakeholders in the

existing standardisation activities sending experts to the new ESO work

items.


RECOMMENDATION (1)

20

C-ITS standards that might limit the functionality in urban use cases.

Consider all possible means to enable urban road operators to

build-up technical as well as financial capacity to contribute to

required standardisation

Financial capacity could be stimulated by funding / co-funding

schemes particularly addressing such standardisation activities.

Technical capacity could be created by dedicated actions to develop

guidelines, online educational services, but also by raising awareness

which standards require road operator contribution and how this

contribution could be established


RECOMMENDATION (2)

21

Standards that have impact on urban operators’ business processes

Agree on the full list of standards falling into this category and

stimulate road operator contribution to the respective standardisation

activities. Instruments to raise awareness and stimulate

contribution would be needed.


RECOMMENDATION (3)

22

Standards supporting procurement

Launch a dedicated activity to describe required testing

specification for C-ITS services and equipment for road operators.

Extend described supporting actions to build-up technical capacity

(and maybe also financial capacity) to test standards and testing as a

whole.


RECOMMENDATION (4)

C-ITS POTENTIAL/EXPECTED IMPACT ON

URBAN MOBILITY

23

24

Even though (C-ITS) is a small ‘’market’’, it can disrupt/change the current

business of ITS and opens up a new value chain due to its potential of

bringing what ITS can not provide or at least optimise existing ITS services.

Generally, it is expected that C-ITS has positive impact on:

urban road safety for all road users, including VRU and

reducing traffic emission and optimising traffic flow.

Providing personalised information tailored to the need of individuals taking

into account the collective public road authority policy(ies)

C-ITS provide a platform for communication between different modes of

transport

C-ITS is an opportunity for migration paths and interoperability


POTENTIAL/EXPECTED IMPACT ON URBAN MOBILITY

25


INITIAL CITIES’ REQUIREMENTS (FROM ONGOING ACTIVITY OF WP 1)

# Topic Use case (draft) Comment/question

1

Speed

management

Dynamic management of

speed information by

providing contextual

speed, for instance when

children getting

into/leaving schools

2

Safety Green lights for

designated vehicles

(police, emergency vehicle

/and Fire/rescue vehicles)

Minimising traffic distraction

26


INITIAL CITIES’ REQUIREMENTS (FROM ONGOING ACTIVITY OF WP 1)

# Topic Use case (draft) Comment/question

3

Logistic (mainly

trucks of different

types)

Management of loading and unloading area

for distribution vehicles

4

Urban access

regulations and

Low emission zones

Addressed within the urban-ITS

PT-1701, Was there any

considerations of C-ITS?

Regulation of access to ‘’free’’ lanes, e.g.

for electric vehicle or HOV. Dynamic usage

of road lanes upon public road authority’s

policies

Urban access

monitoring

Monitoring of HGVs with dangerous goods,

e.g. in Tunnel

Addressed within the urban-ITS PT-1701, Was there any considerations of C-ITS?

27


WORKSHOP’S PROGRAM

Time slot Activity Moderator/presenter and (panel

members)

11:00 - 11:15 Welcome Osama Al-Gazali

11:15 - 12:00 Presentations: Regional perspectives on standardisation

1. UR:BAN: R&D-German project funded by ministry of economics and

energy

2. Use Case for a UK Local Authority: Improving Signals using C-ITS

Bernd Noll and

Gav Jackman

12:00 - 12:45 Presentation (two parts):

Assessment of relevant ITS/C-ITS standards

C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility

Osama Al-Gazali

12:45 - 13:00 Coffee -

13:00 - 13:45 Panel discussion (Part I):

How to ensure that the list of relevant ITS/C-ITS standards and current

standardisation activities meet cities requirements?

Josef Kaltwasser

(Fischer, Jackman, and Williams)

13:45 - 14:30 Lunch & coffee

14:30 - 15:15

Panel discussion (Part II):

Which additional standards (missing standards) may be needed to

exploit the full C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility?

Josef Kaltwasser

(Fischer, Williams and Araghi)

15:15 - 15:30 Summary and closure Osama Al-Gazali

OUR PARTNERS

28

Thank you!

29

CIMECcimec-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Osama-Al-Gazali... · 15:15 - 15:30 Osama...

Documents

Transcript of CIMECcimec-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Osama-Al-Gazali... · 15:15 - 15:30 Osama...