Chromosome analysis using specific fluorochrome chromomycin a3 (cma) banding pattern in citrus
-
Upload
ministry-of-agriculture-irrigation-and-livestock-mail -
Category
Food
-
view
126 -
download
0
Transcript of Chromosome analysis using specific fluorochrome chromomycin a3 (cma) banding pattern in citrus
Chromosome analysis using specific fluorochrome chromomycin A3 (CMA) banding Pattern in Citrus
Presented by: NOORANI, M1
Advisor: Dr. Chitose HONSHO
Date: 30-10-2014
Part A• Introduction
• Key Point of Presentation
Part B
• Research paper 1
• Knowledge gape
• Plant materials and Methods
• Results and discussion
Part C
• Research paper 2
• Knowledge gape
• Plant materials and Methods
• Results and discussion
• Achieved knowledge
• Discussion section
Citrus Taxonomy Reasons why citrus Taxonomy is
complicated
Citrus is a major crop with a complex taxonomy
for breeders
Family Rutacea consists of six genera
Citrus, Fortunella, Poncirus, Clymenia,
Eremocitrus and Microcitrus
Citrus genus has three true species
Citrus medica (Citron), C mexima (pummelo) and
C reticulata (sweet orange)
Citrus paradise (grape fruit) C sinensis and Citrus
limon (lemon) are hybrids.
1. Large no. of cultivars
2. Wide hybridization (intergeneric and interspecific)
3. Polyploidy
4. Mutations
5. Polyembryony ( Nucellar embryony)
6. Unexpected relationship of the manifold varieties
to one another.
7. Wide cross compatibility
Breeding tropical and subtropical fruits (P.K. RAY)Yamamoto. M et al., (2007)
• Scientists applied many techniques to study Phylogenic relationships of citrus• Karyotypic study is useful technique to understand phylogenic and evolutionary trends (SHAN et al., 2003)
Traditionally staining method
Aceto-carmine
Aceto-orcein
Or Feulgen’s sln
Modern staining with fluorescent
DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)
Chromomycin A3 ( CMA)
Karyotype : length and position of centromere, constriction of chromosome Stain AT, Useful compare to
traditional, but can not show specific banding pattern in citrus (
Khan 2007)
Less informative b/c citrus mitotic chromosome small (Khan 2007)
Promising, GC with A3
Let us study about chromosome analysis while using guanine-cytosine (GC) with specific fluorochrome chromomycin A3 (CMA).
•Verification of chromosomes •Cytogenetic characterization •Identification of hybrids• Phylogenic relationship of different species and genera
• Chromomycin A3 (CMA)•Chromosome karyotyping •Phylogenic relationshipe
CMA Banding Patterns of Chromosomes in Major Citrus Species
(Yamamoto et al,. 2007)
B : Research paper 1:
Let us study together
Objective of the research paper:
• The CMA banding patterns ofimportant species have been revealed.• CMA banding analysis of subgenus ofCitrus papedas has not been reported.•This study clarified chromosome bandingpatterns of papedas and their phylogenicrelationship.
Subgenus : Papedas
Source of image: www.google.com
Knowledge gape
Materials and Methods
Results and discussion
Materials and Methods
Results and discussion
Swingle systematics 1943
For monoembryonic young leaves (3-5mm), adult trees
1mm root tip from germinated seeds (dark 25 c)
Low no. of embryoand low no. of seeds
Fixation, enzymatic maceration (Fukui 1996), 2% Giemsa staining and 0.1g/L CMA (Hizume 1991)
• All accessions had 2n = 18 chromosomes.
• No variation in CMA banding patterns within seedlings of any species
• 7 types CMA- positive banding
Results and Discussion
Results and discussion …
CMA Banding Pattern
Same CMA band, b/c of C medica
homologous ch while in citrus did not.
(A, B and C )But in this study did not possed B
Simplest k ( D and E)Represent C. reticulata
Subgenus papeda b/c Dst was not in citrus
Chromosome configuration different from Citrus
Similarity in both, and it seems C. latipes was ancester of C. maxima
.
Very different C.C from Citrus and
papeda and similar with Yuzu
C. limon, C. aurantium, C. sinensis, aurantifolia, paradisi were proved hybride in previous studies.
2: CMA Staining Analysis of Chromosomes in Citrus Relatives, Clymenia, Eremocitrus and Microcitrus.
(Yamamoto et al,. 2008)
c : Research paper 2
Objective of the research paper:
• (Rutaceae) family has six genera, i.e., Citrus, Fortunella, Poncirus, Clymenia,Eremocitrus, and Microcitrus.•The CMA banding pattern of first three genera has been analyzed by many scientists.• However, CMA banding analysis of the other three genera has not progressed.•In this study, they clarified the variability of CMA chromosome banding patterns in severalspecies belonging to Clymenia, Eremocitrus, and Microcitrus and discussed theirPhylogenic relationships.
Table: shows plant materials
young leaves (3-5mm), adult trees . Fixation, enzymatic maceration and air drying (Fukui 1996), 2% Giemsa staining and 0.1g/L CMA (Hizume 1991)
Chromosome staining 2% Giemsa in phosphat buffer 15 min. after confirmation, de-stain, 0.1 g/L CMA
• All accessions had 2n = 18 chromosomes.
• No variation in CMA banding patterns within seedlings of any species
• 6 types CMA- positive banding
• High chromosomal variability
2 and 4 Identical CMA banding
pattern
1, 2, 3, and 4 were similar with C, D, E
while australasica B, C, D, E
Commonly observed in citrus and Poncirus, pre-dominant D, E
Did not fall in the same category of citrus, Poncirus, Fortunella
M. warburgiana, fruits and leaves are distinct from other Microcitrus.Indora has oil in the mature leaves
Resemblance , B , not similar morphological traits and DNA analysis. Maybe ancestral type
C. Medica ( 2B+8D+8E) primitive type of citrus, P. trifoliata ( 2B+10D+6E). however ( 1, 2,3) show resemblance but instead of B, they showed C. This results may indicate the existence of ancestral type.
• The CMA banding patterns of Cl. polyandra, M. australis, M. inodora, M. warburgiana, and Sydney hybrid were reported for the first time in this study.
• CMA banding pattern of two species were not identical but similar to previous study.
• Variability in Microcitrus chromosome
CMA is useful technique for
• Verification of chromosome numbers and karyotyping
• AT region and GC region
• Phylogenic relationship among citrus
• Determination of heterozygosity and variability in the DNA base composition.
• Yamamoto. M et al., (2007) CMA Banding Patterns of Chromosomes in Major Citrus Species. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 76 (1): 36-40. 2007.
• Yamamoto.M et al., (2008) CMA Staining Analysis of Chromosome in Citrus Relatives, Clymenia, Eremocitrus and Microcitrus. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 77 (1): 24-27. 2008.
Thanks for your kind attention