Christopher R. Blagg.ppt - · PDF filey p a i n i a I y A y e a r k n g l a W a l e ......
Transcript of Christopher R. Blagg.ppt - · PDF filey p a i n i a I y A y e a r k n g l a W a l e ......
Home Hemodialysis Home Hemodialysis
Christopher R. Blagg
• Turkish Society of Nephrology
• 2010• 2010
Kolff’s 1961 tribute to Scribner –
a drawing by Mervin La Rue
• Kolff: “Undoubtedly, we all want our artificial kidneys at home, and this will happen if you are a little late.”
“The adjustment and
rehabilitation of patients with
any chronic disease areany chronic disease are
improved by giving them a
full explanation of their
disease and its treatment and
as much responsibility for
their treatment as they
can accept”
Belding Scribner, 1965
Three times a week home Three times a week home
hemodialysis is better treatment
for many more patients than at
present
The advantages of home
hemodialysis
• Best patient survival
• Best quality of life• Best quality of life
• Best opportunity for rehabilitation
• Most patient control of their own treatment
• Most independence and personal freedom
• Less exposure to infections
• Fewer transportation problems• Fewer transportation problems
• Lower cost
• The best opportunity for longer and/or more frequent dialysis
Home hemodialysis:
quality of life
“Quality of life and ability to work are
better in home dialysis patients than in better in home dialysis patients than in
outpatient dialysis patients, and they
more closely approach patients who
have had a successful kidney
transplant.”
– Evans et al, National Kidney Dialysis and Transplant Study,
1985
Rehabilitation
“If the treatment of chronic uremia
cannot fully rehabilitate the patient, the cannot fully rehabilitate the patient, the
treatment is inadequate”
Scribner, 1963
The disadvantages of home
hemodialysis
• Specialized training units are needed
• Space is needed for dialysis and supplies
• Patients generally need some help, although
less often with newer equipment
• The family will be impacted
• Plumbing and electrical alterations usually • Plumbing and electrical alterations usually
are needed
• Water and electricity bills are increased
• Some patients prefer to socialize with others
Annual cost of dialysis and home
dialysis training in 2008: NKC cost
report
40000
45000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
0
5000
10000
Center HD HHD CAPD CCPD HHDTrg CAPDTrg CCPDTrg
Home dialysis in 2009
• In Australia 22% of dialysis
patients were on PD and 9.4% on
home hemodialysis
• In New Zealand 36% of dialysis
patients were on PD and 16.6% on
home hemodialysishome hemodialysis
• In Canada 18% of dialysis patients
were on PD and 2% on home
hemodialysis
Home dialysis in the U.S.
• Currently about 7% of US dialysis
patients are on PD and between 1.6% and patients are on PD and between 1.6% and
2% are on home hemodialysis – although
this is growing
Prevalent home hemodialysis patients
per million population in 19 countries -
200370
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
Portuga
l
Iceland
Greece
Norw
ay
Spain
Austria
Italy
USA
Germ
any
Denmark
England &
Wales
Netherlands
Canada
Sweden
Sco
tland
Finland
France
Austra
llia
New Z
ealand
International home hemodialysis
prevalence
• Varies dramatically between countries from 0 to 76.8 per million countries from 0 to 76.8 per million population
• Varies dramatically between different regions within a country
• Variation is not explained by variation in use of other modalities, variation in use of other modalities, prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, national wealth or population density
International home hemodialysis
prevalence
• Significant expansion is possible in most countries as possible in most countries as Finland had virtually no home hemodialysis in 1998 but by 2004 had 16.8 p.m.p. - only exceeded by New Zealand and Australia exceeded by New Zealand and Australia
Anyone who can drive a car can
drive a dialysis machinedrive a dialysis machine
(and for little old ladies it is
possible if you can drive a sewing
machine)
Who?
• Almost anyone if motivated, compliant and able to learn
• Patient intelligence is not a significant factor• Patient intelligence is not a significant factor
• Patients with a suitable home
• Patients without severe cardiovascular disease, instability during dialysis, blindness or contraindications to heparin use
• Age is not a contraindication
• Despite availability of an assistant, as far as • Despite availability of an assistant, as far as possible the patient should be responsible for their own care
• Independence rather than dependence is important
Intelligence and home
hemodialysis
• 100 consecutive patients successfully
trained for home hemodialysis at the trained for home hemodialysis at the
NKC had their IQ measured by a clinical
psychologist
• Average IQ was 103 (S.D.= ± 16.2),
range 76-147range 76-147
• Normal IQ is 100 (S.D. = ± 15.0)
Percentage NKC home
hemodialysis patients by age
compared with all WA State and
U.S. dialysis patientsU.S. dialysis patients
10
15
20
25
NKC
WA
0
5
10
0-9 10-
19
20-
29
30-
39
40-
49
50-
59
60-
69
70-
79
80+
WA
US
Percentage NKC home
hemodialysis patients by sex
compared with all WA State and
U.S. dialysis patientsU.S. dialysis patients
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
Male Female
NKC
WA
US
Percentage NKC home
hemodialysis patients by diagnosis
compared with all WA State and
U.S. dialysis patients40
20
25
30
35
40
NKC
WA
0
5
10
15
DM HTN GN PKD OU Other
WA
US
Percentage NKC home
hemodialysis patients by race
compared with all WA State and
U.S. dialysis patients
40
50
60
70
80
NKC
WA
0
10
20
30
W B N A As Ot/Un
WA
US
Yes – with appropriate
training and effective support
services it is as safe or safer services it is as safe or safer
than dialysis in a center
The patient is in control of
their own treatment, not some their own treatment, not some
recently trained technician!
No - but experienced
nephrologists believe at least
20% of patients could be 20% of patients could be
trained to do successful
home hemodialysis if training
programs and support
services were available services were available
Patients’ concerns
• Lack of a satisfactory explanation of the
various techniques
• Belief that patients should not dialyze • Belief that patients should not dialyze
without direct supervision
• Fear of failure to perform self- dialysis
adequately
• Fear of isolation
• Needle phobia• Needle phobia
• Lack of space at home
• Concern about staying awake and about
sleeping during dialysis
Mortality risk and session length in 4,193
Australian hemodialysis patients, 1997-
2004
1.6
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Hazard Ratio
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
<3.5 3.5 - 3.9 4.0 - 4.4 4.5 - 4.9 >=5.0
Longer hemodialysis, even thrice
weekly, provides excellent results
• 445 unselected patients treated with 8 hours dialysis 3 times a week in center hours dialysis 3 times a week in center or at home
• Mean Kt/V 1.67
• After 6 months, 98% were normotensive and off all antihypertensive drugsantihypertensive drugs
• Survival was 87% at 5 years, 75% at 10 years, 55% at 15 years and 43% after 20 years
Unlike conventional hemodialysis, longer
dialysis also maintains nutritional status
• The HEMO study showed conventional
hemodialysis is associated with progressive hemodialysis is associated with progressive
nutritional impairment due to low food intake
resulting from many causes
• In contrast, a recent controlled study in
patients on thrice-weekly 7 to 8 hour center
hemodialysis showed daily energy and hemodialysis showed daily energy and
protein intake, nPNA and body weight
remained stable over 5 years Chazot C, Vo-Van C, Blanc C, Hurot JM, Jean C, Vanel T, Terrat JC, Charra B: Stability of
nutritional parameters during a 5-year follow-up in patients treated with sequential long-
hour hemodialysis. Hemodialysis Int, 2006; 10: 389-393
Longer hemodialysis, even thrice
weekly, provides excellent results
• Recently confirmed in Turkey by Professor Ok and colleagues at Professor Ok and colleagues at Ege University in Izmir in a study comparing more than 200 patients on 8 hours overnight hemodialysis three times a week in center with a three times a week in center with a matched cohort of patients treated with 4 hours of dialysis three times a week in center.
Why hemodialysis at least every
other day is better
• Sudden and cardiac deaths in hemodialysis patients occur most hemodialysis patients occur most frequently on Mondays and Tuesdays
• There is a 45% increase of sudden and of cardiac deaths after the two day interval between treatments compared with other days of the week with other days of the week
• With PD sudden and cardiac deaths are evenly distributed throughout the week
More frequent hemodialysis
• Can be short daily (2-3 or more hours) • Can be short daily (2-3 or more hours)
or long nightly (6-8 hours overnight) 5,
6 or 7 times a week or a combination of
both
• Provides by far the best most adequate
dialysis, especially long nightly dialysis
Clinical benefits of more
frequent hemodialysis
Fewer:
• Hospitalizations
• Medications
• Symptoms during and between treatments
Better:
• Toleration of dialysis
• Hypertension control
• Anemia control
• Cardiovascular statustreatments
• Blood access complications
• Cardiovascular status
• Appetite and nutrition
Quality of life benefits of more
frequent hemodialysis
Better:
• Well being
Less:
• Thirst• Well being
• Mental clarity
• Sexual function
• Sleep
• Energy and strength
• Thirst
• Itching
• Dietary restrictions
• Restless leg
syndrome• Energy and strength
• Opportunity for
rehabilitation
• Tiredness
• Depression
75
100
SHORT DAILY
HOME HD
C
U
M
S
U
R
V
I
Patient survival
25
50
USRDS
CAD TX
2005
HOME HD
N=265
V
I
V
A
L
USRDS
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
YEAR
USRDS
PD AND HD
SURVIVAL
Comparison of
survival of daily
home hemodialysis
patients to survival
of recipients of a
deceased donor deceased donor
kidney transplant
from the USRDS.
Survival is virtually
identical and the
age of the patients
the same.
Conventional machinesIn Seattle we use Braun
machines for some
patients who prefer threepatients who prefer three
times a week home
hemodialysis
Other programs in the
U.S. and elsewhere useU.S. and elsewhere use
Fresenius, Gambro or
other manufacturers’
regular machines quite
successfully
Supplies needed
for thirty 30 liter
treatments on the
NxStage System
One hemodialysis One hemodialysis
machine
There are 90 boxes of
dialysate; each box contains
two 5 liter bags; there are 5
boxes of cartridges
(dialyzer, blood tubing); (dialyzer, blood tubing);
each contains 6 cartridges;
and there is a box of 24
drain lines
What about the future?
• New, smaller and more patient-friendly home
dialysis machines including new technology are
being developed in several countries and being developed in several countries and
should become available in the next few years
• Intriguing possibilities include wearable
artificial kidneys or even an implantable
artificial kidney or a small wearable peritoneal artificial kidney or a small wearable peritoneal
dialysis device
• Advances in transplantation including use of
xenotransplantation and stem cells
Number of US home hemodialysis patients: Data
from ESRD Network Forum, USRDS, NxStage, FMC +
DaVita and Lockridge 2009 estimate
6000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Forum
USRDS
Lockridge
NxStage
0
1000
2000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
NxStage
Estimated
FMC+DV
Patients like more frequent
home hemodialysis!
More than 90% of patients who
have experienced more frequent
hemodialysis NEVER want to go hemodialysis NEVER want to go
back to three times week
conventional dialysis, especially
in a dialysis unit
Useful Websites for Staff and
Patients
• Patient Bill Peckham: • Patient Bill Peckham:
www.billpeckham.com/from_the_sharp
_end_of_the/bill-peckhams-brief-
perso.html ·
• Home Dialysis Central –
www.homedialysis.org
At the 2nd Congress of the
International Society for
Hemodialysis in August 2009,
• An international group of nephrologists • An international group of nephrologists
discussed increasing the use of home-
based dialysis as one way to tackle the
worldwide economic dialysis burden.
• They noted that home hemodialysis
and peritoneal dialysis are less costly
than dialysis in a center in most parts
of the world,
that home self-treatments empower patients
and improve patient outcomes and quality of
life,
that patient education about all treatments
should be increased
and that the dialysis community must
engage with governments and health engage with governments and health
authorities to discuss planning and
provision of all dialysis modalities to
provide the most cost effective treatments