CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

7
_~ *~ ELECTION PRESENTED D'.' JESS HALL. JR G R E E N U W H C H U R C H O F C H R I S T FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO W E с о м е T O N I G M T I N O U R S T U D Y O F B A S I C B I B L E D O C " . п . м е з т о A S T U D Y O F T H A T D O C T R I N E K N O W N A S THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, INCLUDED I N T H E DISCUSSION O F T H E DOCTRINE OF ELECTIOM MUST NECES- SARILY BE SOME REFERENCE T O T H E DOCTRINE OF PRéDESTINATION,, THE DOCTRINE OF REPROBATION, ANC SOME OTHER THINGS BECAUSE ALL OF THESE ARE INTERTWINED AND FORM BUT DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE SAME SU5JECT. 1 WISH IT WERE POSSIBLE TO TAKE ENOUGH TIME TO DEVOTE PERHAPS A MONTH TO A DIS- CUSSION OF THIS SUBJECT. AND EVEN THEN IT MIGHT BE IMPOSSIBLE TO DO IT JUSTICE. SUCH CANNOT BE DOME. EMT I WOULD EMPHASIZE AGAIN т№ г W E ARE SEEKING M A I N L Y T O P U T BEFOKE YOU S O M E BASIC PR.'. PLES OF SCRIPTURE. TO ACQUAINT YOU WITH SOME BASIC CONCEPTS IN THESE AREAS OF PARTICULAR DOC- TRINES IN ORDER THAT YCU, TAKING THESS, MIGHT IN YOUR CONTINUING STUDY OF SCRIFTURE USE THESE 7 MORE PERFECTLY UNDERSTAND THINGS UPON WHICH WE HAVE NOT TOUCHED , Y о THAT END WE ARE REPRO- DUCING THESE SERMONS AND THIS ONE AS WITH THE OTHEF.S WILL, IF! THE COURSE C F T I M E . BE PRINTED AND READY FOR DISTRIBUTION. QUITE OFTEN WHEN WE BEGIN TO SPEAK OF THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, THERE ARE S O M E O F MY BRE- THREN WHO SAY TKAT THERE IS NO SUCH DOCTRINE IN THE WORD OF GOD. BUT THIS IS NOT SO, THERE IS A DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. THERE IS A DOCTRINE OF ELECTION IN SCRIPTURE. AMD . HOPE IN THE COURSE OF THIS LESSON TONIGHT TO BE ABLE TO SET BEFORE YOU, FIRST OF ALL. THE CALVINISTIC COC TRINE OF ELECTION. ITS WEAKNESSES AMD THE AREAS ill WHICH IT CONFLICTS WITH THE WORD OF GOD. AND THEN, HAVING DONE THAT. I WANT TO GO BEYOND JUST STATING WHAT THE BIBLICAL DOCTRINE IS NOI" AMD ЗЕТ BEFORE YOU 3CME pr.lNClPL.ES WHICH 1 THINK WILL BE HELPFUL IN UHDEFASTANDING WHAT THE SCRIPTURAL DOCTRINE OF ELECTION ACTUALLY IS. MANY TIMES WHEN WE BEGIN A DISCUSSION OF SOME- ONE ELSE'S TEACHING. WE ARE ACCUSED OF PUTTING THEIR TEACHING IN OUR OWN LANGUAGE AND OF PUT- TING IT IN OUR OWN LANGUAGE IN ORDER THAT V.'E MIGHT THEN HAVE AN EASY JOB OF SHOWING ITS WEAK- NESSES, THEREFORE, TONIGHT I DO MOT WANT TO WAKE THAT MISTAKE; AND SO WHAT l HAVE TO SAY ACC THE CALVINISTIC DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION AND ELECTION WILL B E T A K E N F R O M C A L V I N I S T I C WRITERS FER..APS WITH BUT ONE EXCEPTION, THE STATEMENTS WILL B E T A K E N FROM A WRITING BY THE LATE LOUI. B E R K H O F W H O W A S P R O F E S S O R O F S Y S T E M A T I C T H E O L O G Y A T C A L V I N S E M I N A R Y . . ! T H I N K T H A T A P R O F E S \ SOR OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY AT CALVSN SEMINARY MIGHT BE REGARDED AS AN EXPERT AS TO JUST EXACT V.'.V. T :: DOCTRINE OF C A L V I N I S M TEACI £5 FIRST OF '..'. :'.. V 'I''. READ TO YOU M R , BERKKOF SPIN TION OF THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION AS IT IS TAUGHT BY CALVINISM. H E STATES THAT ELECTION MAV BE DEFINED A3 "THAT ETERNAL ACT OF GOD WHEREBY HE IN HLS SOVER!EGN GOCC PLEASURE AND ON ACCOUNT NO FORESEEN MERIT IN THEM CHOSES A CERTAIN NUMBER OF M E N T O B E T H E RECIPIENTS CF SPEC: - RACE WI OF ETERNAL SALVATION. 1 ' MOW , IF I MAY SI M P'. V RESTATE THAT . MR. BERKHOF STATES THAT THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION AS TAUGHT BY CALVIN IS THAT GOD UY AN ARBITRARY ACT HAS PREDESTINED CER- ' IN INDIVIDUALS TO SALUAI ION, ANO THAT THEY WILL BE SAVED BY THE GRACE OF GOD. NOW. ACCORDI! ! TEI CALVINISM THIS IS REALLY JUST W E - H A LF THE DOCTRINE AND YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE CALVI :¡S- TIC DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNLESS YCU PLACE BY IT3 SIDE 'HE OTHER HALF OF TI IE COIN. THE OTHER S!. OF THE COIN IS THE CALVINISTIC DOCTRINE OF REPROBATION. THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION,. ACCORDING TO THE C«.L\'.'I::ST, SAVS THAT G C D H A S PREDETERMINED TWJ.Y а с T.VAIN NUMBER O F M E N WILL BE SAVED, THE DOCTRINE OF REPROBATION IS, AS DEFINED B V T H E M , TKAT ETERNAL, DECREE OF GOD WHEREBY HE H A S : "•' î R M I N E O T O P A S S S O M E M E N D V W I T H T H E O P E R A T I O O F H I S S P E C I A L G R A C E A N D T O P U N I S H T H E FOR THEIR 3INS TOTHE MANIFESTATION 0? HIS JUSTICE.*' T'OVV LITT ME PARAPHRASE THAT, ML DEFINES THE DOCTRINE OF REPROBATION AS BEING THE ETER4AL DECREE OF GÒD(T ' IS TO SAY THA' ..N3 ISA DECREE WHICH '•'•-' FROM OR BEFORE THE VERY : - "Gl NNI N ' .3 MACE ІТ EVE:; IM ETERNITY) v.

Transcript of CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

Page 1: CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

_~ *~

E L E C T I O N

P R E S E N T E D D'.'

J E S S H A L L . J R

G R E E N U W H C H U R C H O F C H R I S T

F E B R U A R Y ; : . ISSO

W E с о м е T O N I G M T I N O U R S T U D Y O F B A S I C B I B L E D O C " . п . м е з т о A S T U D Y O F T H A T D O C T R I N E K N O W N A S

T H E D O C T R I N E O F E L E C T I O N , I N C L U D E D I N T H E D I S C U S S I O N O F T H E D O C T R I N E O F E L E C T I O M M U S T N E C E S -

S A R I L Y B E S O M E R E F E R E N C E T O T H E D O C T R I N E O F P R é D E S T I N A T I O N , , T H E D O C T R I N E O F R E P R O B A T I O N , A N C

S O M E OTHER T H I N G S B E C A U S E A L L OF T H E S E A R E I N T E R T W I N E D A N D FORM B U T D I F F E R E N T A S P E C T S OF T H E

S A M E S U 5 J E C T . 1 W I S H I T W E R E P O S S I B L E T O T A K E ENOUGH T I M E T O D E V O T E P E R H A P S A M O N T H T O A D I S -

C U S S I O N O F T H I S S U B J E C T . A N D E V E N T H E N I T M I G H T B E I M P O S S I B L E T O DO I T J U S T I C E . S U C H CANNOT B E

D O M E . E M T I W O U L D E M P H A S I Z E A G A I N т № г W E A R E S E E K I N G M A I N L Y T O P U T B E F O K E Y O U S O M E B A S I C P R . ' .

P L E S O F S C R I P T U R E . T O A C Q U A I N T YOU W I T H S O M E B A S I C C O N C E P T S I N T H E S E A R E A S O F P A R T I C U L A R D O C -

T R I N E S I N ORDER T H A T Y C U , T A K I N G T H E S S , M I G H T I N YOUR C O N T I N U I N G S T U D Y O F S C R I F T U R E U S E T H E S E 7

M O R E P E R F E C T L Y U N D E R S T A N D T H I N G S U P O N W H I C H W E H A V E N O T T O U C H E D , Y о T H A T E N D W E A R E R E P R O -

D U C I N G T H E S E S E R M O N S A N D T H I S O N E A S W I T H T H E OTHEF.S W I L L , IF! T H E C O U R S E C F T I M E . B E P R I N T E D

A N D R E A D Y FOR D I S T R I B U T I O N .

Q U I T E O F T E N W H E N W E B E G I N T O S P E A K O F T H E D O C T R I N E O F E L E C T I O N , T H E R E A R E S O M E O F M Y B R E -

T H R E N WHO SAY TKAT THERE IS NO SUCH DOCTRINE IN THE WORD OF GOD. BUT THIS IS NOT SO, THERE IS

A DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. THERE IS A DOCTRINE OF ELECTION IN SCRIPTURE. AMD . HOPE IN THE

COURSE OF THIS LESSON TONIGHT TO BE ABLE TO SET BEFORE YOU, FIRST OF A L L . THE CALVINISTIC COC�

TRINE OF ELECTION. ITS WEAKNESSES AMD THE AREAS ill WHICH IT CONFLICTS WITH THE WORD OF GOD.

AND THEN, HAVING DONE THAT. I WANT TO GO BEYOND JUST STATING WHAT THE BIBLICAL DOCTRINE IS NOI"

AMD ЗЕТ BEFORE YOU 3CME pr.lNClPL.ES WHICH 1 THINK WILL BE HELPFUL IN UHDEFASTANDING WHAT THE

SCRIPTURAL DOCTRINE OF ELECTION ACTUALLY IS. MANY TIMES WHEN WE BEGIN A DISCUSSION OF SOME-

ONE ELSE'S TEACHING. WE ARE ACCUSED OF PUTTING THEIR TEACHING IN OUR OWN LANGUAGE AND OF PUT-

TING IT IN OUR OWN LANGUAGE IN ORDER THAT V.'E MIGHT THEN HAVE AN EASY JOB OF SHOWING ITS WEAK-

NESSES, T H E R E F O R E , T O N I G H T I DO MOT W A N T T O W A K E T H A T M I S T A K E ; A N D S O W H A T l H A V E T O SAY ACC

T H E C A L V I N I S T I C D O C T R I N E O F P R E D E S T I N A T I O N A N D E L E C T I O N W I L L B E T A K E N F R O M C A L V I N I S T I C W R I T E R S

F E R . . A P S W I T H B U T O N E E X C E P T I O N , T H E S T A T E M E N T S W I L L B E T A K E N F R O M A W R I T I N G B Y T H E L A T E L O U I .

B E R K H O F W H O W A S P R O F E S S O R O F S Y S T E M A T I C T H E O L O G Y A T C A L V I N S E M I N A R Y . . ! T H I N K T H A T A P R O F E S � \

S O R O F S Y S T E M A T I C T H E O L O G Y A T C A L V S N S E M I N A R Y M I G H T B E R E G A R D E D A S A N E X P E R T A S T O J U S T E X A C T

V . ' . V . T : : D O C T R I N E O F C A L V I N I S M T E A C I £ 5 F I R S T O F ' . . ' . : ' . . V ' I ' ' . R E A D T O Y O U M R , B E R K K O F S P I N

T I O N O F T H E D O C T R I N E O F E L E C T I O N A S I T I S T A U G H T B Y C A L V I N I S M . H E S T A T E S T H A T E L E C T I O N M A V B E

D E F I N E D A 3 " T H A T E T E R N A L A C T O F G O D W H E R E B Y H E I N H L S S O V E R ! E G N GOCC P L E A S U R E A N D ON A C C O U N T

N O F O R E S E E N M E R I T I N T H E M C H O S E S A C E R T A I N N U M B E R OF M E N T O B E T H E R E C I P I E N T S C F S P E C : - R A C E

W I O F E T E R N A L S A L V A T I O N . 1 ' M O W , I F I M A Y S I M P ' . V R E S T A T E T H A T . M R . B E R K H O F S T A T E S T H A T T H E

D O C T R I N E OF E L E C T I O N A S T A U G H T BY C A L V I N I S T H A T G O D UY A N A R B I T R A R Y A C T HAS P R E D E S T I N E D C E R -

' IN I N D I V I D U A L S T O S A L U A I I O N , A N O T H A T T H E Y W I L L B E S A V E D BY T H E G R A C E OF G O D . N O W . A C C O R D I ! !

T E I C A L V I N I S M T H I S I S R E A L L Y J U S T W E - H A L F T H E D O C T R I N E A N D Y O U C A N N O T U N D E R S T A N D T H E C A L V I : ¡ S -

T I C D O C T R I N E OF E L E C T I O N U N L E S S YCU P L A C E BY I T 3 S I D E ' H E OTHER H A L F OF T I IE C O I N . T H E OTHER S!.

O F T H E C O I N I S T H E C A L V I N I S T I C D O C T R I N E OF R E P R O B A T I O N . T H E D O C T R I N E OF E L E C T I O N , . AC C OR D ING T O

T H E C « . L \ ' . ' I : : S T , S A V S T H A T G C D H A S P R E D E T E R M I N E D TWJ.Y а с T . V A I N N U M B E R O F M E N W I L L B E S A V E D ,

T H E D O C T R I N E O F R E P R O B A T I O N I S , A S D E F I N E D B V T H E M , T K A T ETERNAL, D E C R E E OF G O D W H E R E B Y H E

H A S : �"•' î R M I N E O T O P A S S S O M E M E N D V W I T H T H E O P E R A T I O O F H I S S P E C I A L G R A C E A N D T O P U N I S H T H E

F O R T H E I R 3 I N S T O T H E M A N I F E S T A T I O N 0 ? H I S J U S T I C E . * ' T'OVV L I T T M E P A R A P H R A S E T H A T , M L

DEFINES THE DOCTRINE OF REPROBATION AS BEING THE ETER4AL DECREE OF G Ò D ( T ' IS TO SAY THA' . .N3 I S A DECREE WHICH '•'•-' FROM OR BEFORE THE VERY :- "Gl NNI N ' .3 MACE ІТ EVE:; IM ETERNITY)

v.

Page 2: CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

E 2

WHEREIN GOD DETERMINED TO PASS CERTAIN MEM BV .'.;�:3 7 3 PUNISH THEM FOR THEIR SINS IN ORDER THAT

THE JUSTICE OF GOO MIGHT ЕЕ MADE M A N I F E S T , ÍN OTHER WORDS. THERE !S NOT ANYTHING IN THE WORLD THAT THESE MEN COULD DO IN ORDER TO AVOID BEING PUNISHED FOR THEIR SINS BECAUSE GOD HAS FROM ETERNITY РЛЕС;£ ГНЕМ '"О ETERNAL DAMNATION.

N O W . HOW DOES THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION WORK? DOES MAN HAVE ANY CHOICE ¡N THE DOCTRi. OF ELECTION TO GRACE OR REPROBATION TO ETERNAL DAMNATIO.. . M R . BERKHOF SAYS CONCERNING THE OPE-RATION OF ELECTION. " I T IS IRRESISTA B L E . T H I S DOES HOT MEAN THAT MAN CANNOT OPPOSE ¡TS EXECU-TION T O A CERTAIN DEGREE, BUT IT DOES MEAN THAT HIS OPPOSITION W I L L NOT P R E V A I L . NEITHER DOES IT ' C O IN THE EXECUTION OF H l S DECREE OVERPOWERS THE HUMAN W I L L IN A MANNER WHICH

IS INCONSISTENT WITH MAN'S FREE AGENCY. І Т DOES MEAN HOWEVER, THAT GOD CAN AND DOES EXC..

SUCH AN INFLUENCE ON THE HUMAN SPIRIT AS TO MAKE ¡T WILL ING A " NOW WHAT M R . BERKHOF IS LOOK-I N G A T H E R E I S T H E A G E - O L D D E L I M M A W H I C H C O N F R O N T S A L L C A L V I N I S T S W H I C H S T A T E S T H A T I F T H I S

O P E R A T I O N O F G R A C E 1 3 I R R E S T I B L E , T H E M I T O F N E C E S S I T Y O V E R R I D E S T H E M O R A L A G E N C Y O F M A N . I F

I T I S I R H E S I S T A B L E . M A N D O E S N ' T H A V E A M Y C H O J C E . î F I T I S I R R E S I S T A B L E . M A N I S M A D E T O B E S A V E D ,

M R . B E R K H O F R E A L I Z E S T H A T T H I S I S I N C O N S I S T E N T W I T H W H A T S C R I P T U R E R E V E A L S C O N C E R N I N G T

NATURE OF MAN AND H I S FREE MORAL AGENCY. H E SEEKS TO AVOID THE DEL IMM A BY SAYING THAT MAN C A N O P P O S E I T , E U T M E C A N O P P O S E I T O N L Y T O A C E R I . ] I D E G R E E A N D H I S O P P O S I T I O N C A N N O T P R E V A I L

H E SAYS MAN IS MOT MADE TO EECOME A CHRISTIAN I N A WAY THAT OVERRIDES H I S FREE W I L L , BUT GOD

WORKS ON HIS SPIRIT IN ORCER TO MAKE HIS SPIRIT W I L L I N G , NOW IT APPEARS TO ME THAT M R , B E R K H C I S T I L L HAS NOT AVOIDED THE D E L I M M A . ÈF GOD OPERATES ON THE HUMAN SPIRIT IN ORDER TO MAKE IT WILL ING, THEN IT APPEARS TO ME THAT WHETHER A MAN IS WILL ING OR NOT IS S T I L L DETERMINED BY AN ACT OF G O D WHICH MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO RESIST BEING W I L L I N G . A N D SO THE DOCTRINE OF

CALV IN ISM S IMPLY STATED I S THAT GOD HAS PREDETERMINED THAT CERTAIN MEN W I L L BE SAVED AND CER-T A I N MEN W I L L BE REPROBATE ETERNALLY FROM THE PRESENCE OF GOD AND THAT MAN DOES MOT HAVE ANY CHOICE I N THE MATTER.

N O W WHAT I S WRONG W I T H T H I S D O C T R I N E ? 1 . і т M A K E S G O D P A R T I A L . і т M A K E S G O D C H O S E T H I S

MAN OVER THAT K A N AND T H I S I S INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT GOD HAG REVEALED CONCERNING H I M S E L F .

T H E APOSTLE PETER I N A C T S \O:?.A S A I D . " O F A TRUTH • PERCEIVE THAT GOC I S NO RESPECTER OF PER-

SONS: B U T IN EVERY NATION HE THAT FEARETH HIM, AND WORKETH RIGHTEOUSNESS, I S ACCEPTED WITH

H I M . • S U R E L Y W H E N S C R I P T U R E S A Y S T H R O U G H T H E I N S P I R E D P E T E R ( П P E T E R з : э ) T H A T I T I S T H E

V/ILL OF GOD THAT A L L MEN SHOULD COME TO REPENTANCE, IT I L L BEHOVES A N Y MAN TO SAY THAT T: :S

I S NOT T H E W I L L OF GOD AMD THAT GOD DOES NOT W I L L THAT A L L MEN SHOULD BE SAVED, BUT THAT GOD

WILLS SOME MEN SHOULD BE ETER.�iALLY REPROafVTE F R O M H I S P R E S E N C E .

2 . T H I S D O C T R I N E O F E L E C T I O N M A K E S G O D A R B I T R A R Y F O R I T R E V E A L S A G O D W H O I S W I E L D I N G U N -

L I M I T E D POWER IN A TYRANICAL AND DESPOTJCAL WAY. І Т REVEALS A GOD WHO WITHOUT AMY REASON AT

A L L LOOKS DOWN AND MAKES SOME ARBITRARY CHOICES AND PLACES CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS ON ONE S I D E AND

CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS OM ANOTHER. A G A I N . T H I S I S CONTRARY TO EVERYTHING THAT GOD HAS REVEALED

CONCERNING H I S NATURE.

3 . T H I S D O C T R I N E O F E L E C T I O N I S U N J U S T T O T H E U N S A V E D F O R T H E U N S A V E D , A C C O R D I N G T O T H E D O C -

T R I N E OF REPROBATION, DO HCT HAVE ANY CHANCE AT A L L . ÜT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE HOW THEY L IV E . І Т MAKES NO DIFFERENCE HOW THEV CRY. ¡T MAKES MO DIFFERENCE HOW THEY PLEAD WITH GOD, НОГ.' THE

V TO G D D . IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE THAT THEY MAY, ACCORDING TO THE TEACHING OF SOME OF THES.�:

INDIVIDUALS, COME TO THE MOURNERS BENCH AND SEEM FCR WEEKS AMD FOR MONTHS TO PRAY THROUG... IF

GOD HAS PREDETERMINED THEM TO ETERNAL DAMNATION, THEY DO NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO BE SAVED.. . ІС

CERTAINLY GOD ¡S TO 3E PRAI3ED FOR SAVING THE Z.LECT . W E ' L L T A L K AEOUT THE ELECT AND HOW THEY BECOME '.'. - 'J.LECT WHEN WE T A L K AEOUT B I B L I C A L DOCTRINE, 3UT GOD S3 HOT TO BE CHARGED WITH . CONDEMNATION OF THE LOST FOR GOD DESIRES THE SALVATION Oi- A L L PEOPLE " F O R GoD SC LOVED . WORLD (THAT MEANS HUMANITY) , THAT HE GAVE H.S ONLY 3EGÖTTEN SON THAT WHOSOEVER DELIEVETl

HIM SHOULD NOT PERISH BUT HAVE EVERLASTING L ! F E . ; ' LOOK AT ROMANS 0 , 5 2 . '1-lE THAT SPARED NOT '_, ¡>v.

N S O N , BUT DELIVERED H IM UP FOR US ALL HOW SHALL HE MOT WrTHAALSO FREELY GiVE U S A ' . L O O K A T H P E T E R 3 ; S . " T H E L O R D I S NOT S U ICERNING His A s SOME ;.: :.

Page 3: CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

.' - SE ;

COUNT SLACKNESS; BUT ¡5 LONGSUFFERING TC US-WARD. NOT WILLING THAT ANY F.HOULO PERISH . BUT THAT ALL SHOULD COME TO REPENTANCE . " GOD OFFERS PARDON, GCD OFFERS SPIRITUAL PEACE TO EVERY INDIVIDUAL. H E OFFERS IT UPON THE BASIS OF THE ATONING WORK CF H l S SOM AND NOTHING IN ALL OF THIS WORLD PREVENTS A MAN FROM RECEIVING THE BENEFITS OF THAT ATONING WORK EXCEPT HIS UNWILLINGNESS TO RECEIVE THAT WHICH GOD HAS OFFERED UNTO H I M .

4 . Т Н : 3 DOCTRINE DESTROYS HUMAN FREEDOM, SURELY THROUGH THE MEANS OF THE GOSPEL, THE

AGENCY OF GOD'S PEOPLE, GOQ LEADS, GOD PERSUADES, GOD ENTREATS. AND GOD EXHORTS. BUT NEVE.:

ANYWHERE IN THE B I B L E DO WE HAVE AN INTIMATION OF A MINT THAT GOO EITHER SAVES T H E M WHEN THEV

ARE UNWILLING TO BE SAVED OR MAKES THEM W I L L I N G TO BE SAVED IN S P I T E OF THEIR SINS

5. T H I S DOCTRINE DISCOURAGES SAVING T H E LOST WHY SHOULD I BE CONCERNED ABOUT GOING INTO

A L L O F T H E W O R L O A N D P R E A C H I N G T H E G O S P E L O F J E S U S C H R I S T W H E N G O D H A S A L R E A D Y F I X E D F O R

ETERNITY T H E DESTINATION OF EVERY INDIVIDUAL WHO SHALL HAVE EVER L I V E D ON T H E FACE OF T H E

EARTH. GOD HAS ALREADY TAKEN T H I S INDIVIDUAL AND г�T.EDESTINED H I M TO ETERNAL L I F E A N D GCD

HAS TAKEN ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL A N D PREDESTINED H I M TO ETERNAL DAMNATION AND THERE I S NCT A N Y -

THING I N T H I S WORLD THAT CAN CHANGE THOSE DECREES « н THEN SHOULD 1 BE WORRIED ABOUT FREACI.

IN3 T H E GOSPEL? I F GOD HAS PREDESTINED A MAM TO BE SAVED, THAT MAM CAN A N D THAT MAN W I L L BE

SAVED I N SPITE OF MY EFFORTS OR I N SPITE OF T H E LACK OF M Y EFFORTS TO CARRY H I M T H E GOSPEL OF

JESUS C H R I S T .

6. T H E DOCTRINE TENDS TOWARD I M M O R A L I T Y . WHEN A MAN HAS BEEN PREDESTINED TO ETERNAL

L I F E AND WHEN. HAVING BEEN PREDESTINED TO ETERNAL L I F E , THERE I S NOT ANYTHING HE CAN DO.

THERE I S NOT ANYTHING THAT T H E D E V I L CAN DO. THERE I S NOT ANY WAY I I I T H I S WORLD THAT HE CAN

M I S S GETTING THERE WHY SHOULD HE BE CONCERNED AEOUT L I V I N G ACCORDING TO T H E INSTRUCTIONS OF

T H E N . T . I F HE HAS BEEN PREDESTINED TO ETERNAL L I F E THEN A L L OF T H E SINS THAT HE MIGHT C O M M I .

I N SPITE OF A LACK OF REPENTANCE, WOULD NOT KEEP H I M OUT OF HEAVEN.

7 . T H I S DOCTRINE TENDS TOWARD P R I D E , FOR I. YOU S E E . HAVE BECOME OME OF T H E E L E C T , I A M

ONE OF T H E PREDESTINED, AMD A L L OF THESE UNSAVED OUT HERE GOD DIDN'T PREFER T H E M . GOD DION''

E L E C T T H E M , . T H E R E F O R E , ( H A V E P P . ì D E C E C A U S E G O D H A S C H O S E N M E A B O V E A L L O T H E R S .

A L L OF THESE THINGS ARE WRONG, UNSCRIPTURAL, ABCUT T H E C A L V I N I S T I C DOCTRINE OF ELECTION, BUT NOV.'. HAVING MADE THESE COMMENTS ABOUT WHAT THE BLELICAL DOCTRINE OF ELECTION I S NOT. WE HAVE YET THE MOST IMPORTANT HALF OF THE LESSOM AND THAT HALF DEALS WITH THE QUESTION.

WHAT IS THE B I B L I C A L DOCTRINE OF ELECTION?" F I R S T , L E T M E SET FORTH SOME PRELIMINARY THOUGHTS. L E T M E LAY SOME FOUNDATION UPCM WHICH WE LATER vifANT TO B U I L D . L E T M E SUGGEST IN THE FIRST PLACE THAT GOD TAKES THE IN IT IATIVE IN SALVATION. CNE MAM HAS SAID THAT THE DOC-TRINE TERMED ELECTION, IS NONE OTHER THAN GOD'S IN IT IAT IVE IN SALVATION OR GOD'S SOVEREIGNTY IN RELATION TO MAN'S REDEMPTION. AND I BELIEVE THAT'S T R U E . WE OPEN UP OUR E l B L E S TO G E N E -SIS 1 ; 1 AND THERE WE READ IN RELATION TO THE CREATION, " ÍN THE BEGINNING GOD . " I BELIEVE THAT THAT STATEMENT. " IN THE BEGINNING GOD, я APPLIES NCT ONLY TO THE SEG.r�INi NS OF GOD'S PHYSICAL

CREATION. BUT I BELIEVE I T A P P L I E S ALSO TC THE BEGINNING OF THE WORK OF REDEEMING MAM, " 'tí IN IT IATIVE K=.D TO BE IN GOD. MAM DOES NOT REVEAL HIMSELF TO G O D . GOD REVEALS H I M S E L F TO MAN. A 3 WE LOOK AT THE SCRIPTURES. AS WE LOOF. AT THE REVELATIONS THAT, GOD HAS ''.ADE OF H I M S E L F UNTO U 3 , THE TENOR OF THE ENTIRE LENGTH AND BREADTH CF E l E L I C AL TRUTH 15 THAT GOD INITIATES SALVATION. Tl\E ZENITH OF ALL OF GOD'S VifORK IS SALVATION. HE SENT CHRIST IM OF.OER TO MAKE SALVATION ОГ; REDEMPTION POSSIBLE. LUKE 1 9 , 1 0 JESUS SAIO. 'Ч A M COME TC SEEK AND

TC SAVE THAT WHICH WAS L O S T . ' 1 H E '.VAS SAYING THAT H.E;:E ¡3 THE EXERCISING OF THE IN IT IAT IVE ON GOD'S PART TO PROVIDE A MEAItS, TO PROVIDE A WAV, WHEREBY THE GUL? THAT HAD BEEN CREATED BETWEE.. YOD AND MAH THROUGH МЛН S ЗН'З Ml Г.Y' SE BRIDGED, MOT BV AN ACT OF MAN U-íT BY AV ACT OF GOD. SO THIS IS THE FIRST ГН NS, ." 7D A VERV IM T MATTER FOR CONSII ERATION

GOD INITIATES SALVATION.

2 . W E H E E D T O R E M E : . : з е п T H A T G O D ACTS WITH A P U R P O S E I N ELECTION. C O D A C T S W I T H A P U R -

P O S E THAT IS ETERNAL, GOD'S SCHEME OF REDEMPTION C.D NOT COME (NTC H l S MIND ON THE DAV OF

CRUCIFIXION. T H E DAY OF TH!�: CRUCIFIXION '.VAS THE .7; ..MI MATION OP THE SCHEME OF REDEMPTION

Page 4: CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

i

THAT НАС ВЕЕМ IN THE M I N D OF GOD FROM ETERNITY. EVERYTHING THAT GCD DID FROM THE FALL OF

MAN TO THE COMING OF JESUS C H R I S T INTO THE WORLD WAS DONE W I T H A SPECIFI C PURPOSE IN M l

AND THAT PURPOSE WAS THE REDEMPTION OF MAM If.' CONFORMITY W I T H GOD'S ETERNAL PLAN L I S T E N

т о И T I M O T H Y î : 9 � ю , " W H O H A T H S A V E D U S . A N D C A L L E D U S W I T H A N H O L Y C A L L I N G , N O T A C C O R D I N G

T O O U R WORKS« B U T A C C O R D I N G T O H I S O W N P U R P O S E A N D G R A C E , W H I C H W A S G I V E N u s I N C H R I S T J E S U S

BEFORE THE V/ORLD BEGAN? BUT IS NOW MADE MANIFEST 3Y THE APPEARING OF OUR S A V I O U F JESUS СНП\

W H O H A T H A B O L I S H E D D E A T H . A N C H A T H B R O U G H T L I F E A M D I M M O R T A L I T Y T O L I G H T T H R O U G H T H E G O S P E L .

THERE :S NOTHING ARBITRARY, THERE I S NOTHING UHGFACIOUS. THERE I S NOTHING UNLOVING I N GOD�S

DEALINGS W I T H M A N , FOR SUCH WOULO CONTROVERT HIS RIGHTEOUS NATURE. SUCH WOULD SAY THAT

EVERYTHING THAT GOD HAS S A I D CONCERNING H I M S E L F I S NOT T R U E . A L L OF T H E GOOD THAT COMES

INTO T H E L I V E S OF M E N , T H E GREATEST OF WHICH I S M A N ' S ETERNAL REDEMPTION , COME S A S A R E -

SULT CF THE GRACIOUS PURPOSE OF GOD THROUGH T H E A G E S .

3 , WE MEED TO BE AWARE OF T H E DANGER OF A ONE�SIDED VIEW OF GOD . W H E N WE LOOK AT GOD

AND EMPHASIZE H I S W I L L . H I S I N F I N I T E POWER, HLS OMNISCIENCE, AND T H I N K NOTHING OF HLS L O V E ,

His MERCY. His GRACE, AMD H I S RIGHTEOUSNESS, THERE I S A DANGER OF DERIVING A CONCEPT OF GOD

AS BEING A GOD THAT IS AN ARBITRARY DESPOT RATHER THAN A FORGIVING FATHER WHO DESIRES THE

BEST FOR H i s C R E A T U R E S . I N OTHER WORDS, I T I S THE ERROR O F CONCEIVING O F T H E S O V E R E I G N T Y O F

G O D A S A F U N C T I O N O F H I S G O O D P L E A S U R E R A T H E R T H A N I N T E R M S O F A N E T E R N A L P U R P O S E D E S I R I N G

THE GOOD OF A L L . A N D H O W M A N Y T I M E S H A V E Y O U H E A R D Y H A T ? H O W M A N Y T I M E S H A V E W E L O O K E D

INTO SCRIPTURE AMD WE FAVE SEEN AM ACT OF GOD, AND THE ONLY THING V.'E SAID ABOUT I T , THE ONLY

THING WE FELT WE CCULD LAY ABOUT I T . V/AS THAT IT WAS JUST AN ARBITRARY ACT OF THE GOOD PLEA �

SUF.E OF GOD. W H E N S U C H V / A S N O T T H E C A S E AT A L L . 1 A M NOT SAYING THAT G O D DOES NOT HAVE THE

RIGHT TO EXERCISE H i s GOOD PLEASURE. BUT WHAT i A M SAYING I S THAT GOD'S GOOD PLEASURE JS NOT

EXERCISED ARBITRARILY. EVERY DEED THAT GOD HAS DONE IT HAS BEEN H I S GOOD PLEASURE TO WORK

FOR THE ETERNAL PURPOSE THAT H E WAS WORKING FOR MAM IH JESUS C H R I S T .

4 . W E MEED TO BE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THE ATONEMENT IS NOT L I M I T E D . BUT GENERAL. WHEN

IT I S HELD THAT GOD FOREORDAINED SOME MEM TO ETERNAL DAMNATION W H I L E HE FOREORDAINED OTHER

MEM TO ETERNAL L I F E IT IS A NECESSARY CONCLUSION THAT JESUS C H R I S T CAME TC DIE FOR SOME M E N ,

BUT H E DID NOT COME TO D I E FOR OTHERS. T H I S IS NOT AN OVERSTATEMENT OF THE DOCTRINE, L.STEN

л а м п т о M R . B E R K H O F . . ' C H R I S T D I E D F O R T H E P U R P O S E O F A C T U A L L Y A N D C E R T A I N L Y S A V I N G T H E E L E C

AND T H E ELECT ONLY. T H I S 1 3 EQUIVALENT TO SAYING THAT HE DIED FOR T H E PURPOSE CF SAVING ONLY

т н о з е T O W H O M H E A C T U A L L Y A P P L I E S T H E B E N E F I T S O F H I S R E D E M P T I V E W O R K . " M R , B E R K H O F S A Y S

THAT JESUS DIDN�T DI E FOR A L L M E M . H E ONLY DIED FOR T H E E L E C T . NOV/ SOME HAVE MOT BEEN A B L E

TO ACCEPT T H I S KIND OF 5 T R A I G H T - F R 0 . ' J Í - T H E - B O T 7 L E CALVIN IST IC DOCTRINE AND THEY HAVE SOUGHT T O M O D I F Y T H E D C C T R I H E . A S D I D A , H , S T R O N G I N H I S W O R K O N S Y S T E M A T I C т н ^ п р у , H E M A K E S

I T COME OUT T H I S WAY. " T H E SCRIPTURES REPRESENT T H E ATONEMENT AS HAVING BEEN MADE FOR A L L

MEN AMD A S SUFFICIENT FOR T H E SALVATION OF A L L . NOT T H E ATONEMENT THEREFORE I S L M I I T E D . BUT

T H E A P P L I C A T I O N O F T H E A T O N E M E N T T H R O U G H T H E W O R K O F T H E H O L Y S P I R I T . * і м O T H E R W O R D S . M E

í S S A V I N G J E S U S D I E D F O R A L L . M E N , B U T T H E P R O B L E M , M R . S T R O N G S A Y S , : S T H A T T H E H O L Y S P I R I T

M U S T M O T H A V E K N O W N T K A T , B E C A U S E H E J U S T G O E S T O W O R K O N л F E W M E N . T H E Y A R E T H E E L E C T

A N D T H E R E S T O F T H E M A R E L E F T O U T . N O W O F T H E S E TV.'O P O S I T I O N S , ! D E L I E V E T H E L A T T E R , 7 7

M O D I F I C A T I O N , I S T H E W O R S T D O C T R I N E . A C C O R D I N G T O T H E F I R S T . H E R E ' S A M A M V / H O I S L O S T A N D

Y O U C A N G O T O H I M A N D S A Y . " I ' M S O R R Y T H E R E I S N O T H I N G T O R Y O U . " B U T A C C O R D I N G T O T H E S E C O N D

M A N Y O U G O T O H I M A M D S A Y . " T H E R E I S S O M E T H I N G F O R V O U E U T V O U C A N ' T 1 A V E I T . N { T I S L I K E G O -

I N G T C A S T A R V I N G M A N W H O C R A Y / L S I N O F F T H E D E S E R T , H U N G R Y A N D T H I R S T Y A N D D Y I N G A M D A M A N

G O E S A M D S A Y S , " T H E R E I S A B I G B A N Q U E T I N S I D E . B U T T H E R E I S N O T H I N G г з п Y O U . I ' M S O R R Y . " B U T

T H E S E C O N D P O S I T O N G O E S T O T H I S H U N G R Y . T H I R S T Y , D Y I N G M A N A M D S A Y S , ' Y : L 7 . R S I S A G R E A T B I G

FEAST I N HERE AND I T I S FOR YOU. * YOU GET H I S HOPES A L L BUILT UP AMD THEN SAY. " B U T YOU с .1

H A V E I T , S O T H E M O D I F I C A T I O N I S R E A L L Y W O R S E т к а н T H E D O C T R I N E W H I C H I T A T T E M P T S T O M O D . . " "

BOTH O F T H E M A R E W R O N G B E C A U S E T H E A T O N E M E N T ; J M O T L H . M T E D . N E I T I E M I S T H E A P P L I C A T I O N O F

THE ATO! Г L I M I T E D SO TKAT SOME CANNOT HAVE IT P L I E D T O T H E M , L I S T E N T O I I P E T E R 2 Ц .

Page 5: CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

p

PAGE S

(THESE .ARE PASSAGES WHICH SHOW THAT THE DEATH OF CHRIST IS FOR ALL, EVEN THOSE WHO ARE CON-

SIDERED AS LOST .) 'Бит THERE WERE FALSE PROPHETS ALSO AMONG THE PEOPLE, EVEN A3 THERE SHALL

DZ FALSE TEACHERS AMONG YOU, WHO PRIVILY SHALL DENY THE L O R D THAT POUGHT T H E M . AND BRING I

THEMSELVES SWIFT D E S T R U C T I O N . " HERE ARE INDIVIDUALS WHO DEMY THE M A S T E R . BUT PETER SAID T H E ,

DENY THE MASTER THAT BOUGHT Х1ШІІ. H E DIED FOR T H E M . T H E ATONEMENT WAS MOT L I M . T E D , . JOHN

2 : 2 , ' A N D H E I S T H E P R O P I T I A T I O N F O R O U R S I N S : AND NOT FOR OURS ONLY, BUT ALSO FOR THE SIMS OF

THE WHOLE WOKLQ. n

l T I M O T H Y 2 . 6 . ' 'WHO GAVE H I M S E L F A, RANSOM FQR AJLJU«" T l T U S 2 ; 11 . "FOR TH .

GRACE OF GOD TKAT BRINGETH SALVATION MATH APPEARED TO A L L MEM.. " T H E ATONEMENT IS GENERAL. IT

IS MOT L I M I T E D .

MOW V/E HAVE SAID THAT EVERY ACT TRAT GOD HAS DOME КЛЗ BEEN DONE IN RELATIONSHIP TO H l S PUR-

POSE FOR M A N K I N D . NOW WHAT IS GOD'S PURPOSE FOR MANKIND? GOD' S PURPC3E FOR MANKIND IS D I S -

CERNED IN EOTH THE O . T , AND N . T . F R O M THE BEGINNING OF T I M E I T STRIKES US THAT THE PURPOSE OF

G O D I S M O T L I M I T E D , CUT WORLDWIDE IM I T S S C O P E C E F î T A I N L Y TH IS I S TRUE AS W E READ SCRIPTURE THAT T H E C H O I C E O F G O D S O M E T I M E S NARROWS ITSELF DOWN THROUGH M A M . W E M U S T A L W A Y S L O O K A T

T H E S E C H O I C E S N O T A S E N D S I N T H E M S E L V E S . S U T A S M E A N S T O T H E L A R G E R E N D O F A C C O M P L I S H I N G G O D '

E T E R N A L P U R P O S E . L E T ' S L O O K A T S O M E O F T H E M í N T H E O . T . A S S O O N A S M A N I S C A S T O U T O F T H E

G A R D E N , G O D G I V E S H I M H O P E I N G E M E S I S 3 . 1 5 , T H E M T H E R E I S A C H O S I N G O F S E T H O V E R A G A I N S T T H E

L I M E O F C A í N F O R I T I S S A I D . ' ' T H E N B E G A N M E N T O C A L L O N T H E N A M E O F J E H O V A H . 1 1 G E N - S I S 4 : 2 0 ,

T H E N E X T E L E C T I O N I S T H A T OF N O A H AND H I S F A M I L Y а з T H E C H A N N E L T H R O U G H W H I C H G e o s B L E S S I N G S

ARE GOING TO COME TO THE WORLD. GENESIS 6 : B . PROM NOAH'S F A M I L Y ОМЕ I S CHOSEN. S H E M . AMD

FRCM THE S H E M I T E S ONE IS CHOSEN. ABRAHA M IS SELECTED AND GOD'S REMARK TO A B R A H A M OISCLOSES

H i s P R O P O S E D W I L L T O W A R D M A N K I N D . L I S T E N T O I T F R O M G E N E S I S 1 2 5 2 3 . " A N D ! W I L L M A K E O F T H E .

A GREAT N A T I O N , AMD f W I L L BLESS T H E E , AMD MAKE THY NAME GREAT: AND THOU SHALT BE A BLESSING:

A N D ! W I L L BLESS T H E M THAT BLESS T K E E , AMD CURSE H I M THAT CURSETH T H E E ; AND JN THEE SMALI,. A L '

F A M I L I E S CF THE EARTH ¡__ B L E S S E D , " YOU SEE GOD'S PURPOSE IN CHOSING S E T H AND IN CHOSING NOAH AMD IN CHOSING SHEM AND IN CHOSING ABRAHAM WAS NOT ONE THAT V/AS L I M I T E D IN SCOPE BUT V/AS FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF BRINGING A BLESSING TO A L L MANKIND. FROM A B R A H A M ' S SONS ISAAC V/AS CHOSEN AND FROM ISAAC'S SONS, JACOB WAS CHOSEN AND JACOB BECAME I S R A E L . AND NATIONAL ISRAEL BECAME GOD'S ELECT, THE ONES THROUGH WHOM ."¡S WAS TO BESTOW H l S FAVOR UPON THE WORLD IN THE COMING OF JESUS C H R I S T . L I S T E N TO THESE O . T r PASSAGES. E Z E K I E L 2 0 ! 5 . " T H U S SAITH THE LORD GOD, ,N THE CAY WHEN i CHOSE I S R A E L . AND L IFTED UP MIME HAND UNTO THE SEED OF THE HOUSE OF JACC P S A L M 1 0 S : O , ' O YE SEED OF ABRAHAM HIS SERVANT, YE CHILDREN OF JACOB. HJS gHQSEN " GOD СНОГ

ISRAEL. YET THE UNIVERSAL SWEEP OF ISRAEL'S CALL CANNOT BE OVERLOOKED. FOR SF WE OVERLOOK THE

UNIVERSAL SWEEP OF ¡ISRAEL'S C A L L , WE MISS THE VERY PURPOSE FOR WHICH GOD CALLED THEM . ÍN ISA IAH 4 Э : в ISA WH S A I D , " I V/ILL A L S O GIVE THEE FOR A L I G H T I Q THE G E N T I L E S . THAT THOU MAYEST BE ¡_ SALVATION _____ TÜE END. flg THJÌ EARTH " G O D , WHY DID YOU CHOSE t SRA EL? WHY DID YOU WANT THEM TO BE EXCLUSIVE? GOD CHOSE ISRAEL TO BE FV.r.x »«ті.п�, |N ORDER THAT THEV MIGHT ACCOMPLISH GOD'S

A L L INCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF SENDIMG REDEMPTION AND SALVATION TO T H E ENTIRE W O R L D ,

BUT MOT ONLY IS GOD'S PURPOSE FOR MANKIND DISCERNED IN T H E O . T , , G O D ' S PURPOSE F O R MANKIN

IS DISCERNED Ml THE N . T . І Т IS DISCERNED IM THE INCARNATION AND IN T H E ATONEMENT OF JESUS CHRIS

I N L U K E ¿ t 2 9 - 3 2 S I M E O N I S S P E A K I N G . H E S A I D , " L O R D , N O W L E T T E S T T H O U T H Y S E R V A N T D E P A R T I N

PEACE, ACCORDING TO THY WORD, FOR MIME EYES l-IAVE SEEN THY SALVAT ION , WHICH THOU 'AST PREPAI BEFORE THE I ACE OF A L L PEOPLE: A LIGHT TO LIGHTEN THE G E N T I L E S , AMD THE GLORY OF THY PEOPLE I S R A E L . " ë l M E O N HAD BEEN LOOKING FOR THE COM.YiG CF M E S S I A H AND HE WAS NOT TO DIE UNTIL MESSI CAME, AND HE SAID HERE, "J HAVE SEEN M E S S I A H ¡¡-.CARNATE. ï HAVE SEEM H I M WHO WAS COME TO B E A LIGHT TO I HE G E N T I L E S . ™ W E HAVE ALREADY SEEM THAT EVERY STATEMENT RELATIVE TO THE PURPOSE OF THE ATONEMENT -AS IT RELATES TO MANKIND SHOWS THAT THE ATONEMENT IS UNIVERSAL AMD NOT L I M t -

'E PINO ALSO THAT MI THE N . T . GOD'S PURPOSE FOR MANKIND IS SEEN IN THE HISTORY AMD THE TEACHING OF THE EARLY CHURCH, INDEED THIS :S ONE OF THE GREAT STRUGGLES THAT WE BEE BEING -"-RIED ON IN THE EARLY CHURCH IN THE BOOK OF A C T S . ON THE ONE HAND THERE WERE THOSE WHO -'•' ID T l . .

ft. '.. .: JEWS AND WAS T O BE L I M I T E D TO THE JEV. 7 . CM THE OTHER HAI 5 THERE WERE T I

Page 6: CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

WHO S A I D T H A T T H E R E V/AS NO L I M I T A T I O N T O T H E G O S P E L A N D T H E G O S P E L V/AS T C GO T O 7 ' E R Y

I S L E W A B H O T R E A L L Y S O L V E D U N T I L A M I R A C L E C A M E T O P^R:R:: í N T H E T E N T H • р т е

A C T S A N D U N T I L T H E Y H A D A N I N S P I R E D M E S S A G E I N T H E F I F T E E N T H с й а р т і I W H I C H S A I D . L E T

S E N T I L E . R E T H R E N I N T O T H E C H U R C H O F G O D , " I N F A C T , W H E : W E T U R N T O T H E E F . � : E S I A :

F I N D T H A T T H E M Y S T E R Y V/HICH H A D U N T I L T H E T I M E O F T H E G O S P E L D I S P E N S A T I O N B E E N H I D D E N ,

HAD BEEN HIDDEN P A U L S A ID THROUGH A L L OF THE AGES AM:: MADE KNOW7 "".17..

� COSPEL WAS FOR THE G E N T I L E A S V/ELL AS FOR THE J E W . T H E G E N T I L E , ACCORDING TO PA

E P H E S I A N S з , I S F E L L O W H E I R , ;S A F E L L O W M E M B E R O F T H E BODY A N D I S F E L L O W ' PA .... я OF

P R O M I S E I M C H R I S T J E S U S T H R O U G H T H E G O S P E L , E P H E S I A N S з : ; �

B U T NOY/ W H I L E T H I S I S G O D ' 3 P U R P O S E FT I D , W H A T 1 3 G O O ' S P U R P O S E F O R T H E I N D I .

I T CAM R E A D I L Y B E S E E M . I B E L I E V E . T H A T G O D ' S D E A L I N G W I T H T H E ¡ N D I V I O U A L C A . ! B E S T B E UN

S T O O D , A N D I T C A N O N L Y B E U N D E R S T O O D , I N C O N T E X T W I T H G O D ' S L A R G E R P L A N F O I ! T H E W H O L E

W H E N W E B E G I N T O S E E G O D - S PURPOSE FOR T H E W H O L E W O R L D I N J E S U S C H R I S T I . W E .

OM T H E A C T S T K A T G O D T O O K H I ONOSN T C D R I N G T O F R U I T I O N H L S R E 7 :... . I N J I

с н г к з т , M A N Y O F T H E C H O I C E S W H I C H V E I M E O A T T H E T I M E T O е е A R B I T R A R Y . P R C / E T O в ï M O S

C I O L ' S A C T S R E L A T E D T O H L S R I G H T E O U S P U R P O S E F O R A L L M A N K I N D , Q O O F O R E S E E . " , A S F A R A S 1 I

D I V I D U A L I S C O N C E R N E D . T H E F A I T H O F T H E ¡ . Z L I ^ V E R , W H E N D D E S G O O 7 1 I T ? ' .5 GL

V/M7N DOES GOC T.',EC7? .CON'T BELIEVE THAT SOD GAN CHOS i .'.r.'rr.r. ;.!.'.••:, .-or: I F GOD CH -3F.S / . Y .. .

MAM THAT WOULD MAKE MAN SUPERIOH TO G C D , I DON''; BEL i EVE THAT GOC 7.11 CHOOSEA № WI1

MAN, FOR IF GOD CHOOSES ALONG wiru MAN, THAT WOULD MAKE GOD DEPENDANT UPON MAI Go'. . CHOOSE MAN BEFORE MAN CHOOSES G OD FOR IT IS ONLY WHEN GOD CHCUS : . Y .','. С

GOD T M T THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOO CAM BE MAINTAINED.

T H I S I S T H E C L E A R T E A C H I N G O F E C P I P T U R E , E P H . ' A C C O R D I ¡G A S H : v . OSE

HIM BEFORE THE FOUNDATION Ol' THE V/CRLD." I l TIMOTHY 1 : S?. ".VYl-J HATH SAVED US. ANC CALI.

WITH AN HO.-Y CALLING, NOT ACCORDING TO CUR WORKS EUT ACCORDING TO MIS OWN PURPC : ANC

W H I C H W A S G I V E N u s I N C H R I S T J E S U S H E F O R E T H E W O R L D в е с а м . " N O W I F T H O S E P A S S

V S A Y T H A T W E H A V E B E E N C M O S E M I N G O O г � E F O R E W E H A V E C H O S E N G O D . B U T O W D��

TH.S M E A N T H A T , T H O U G H M A M í S C H O S E N O F Gor: BEFORS MAN CHOOSES G 0 7 , THAT THIS

B I T R A R Y , T H A T T H I S C H O I C E I S O F S U C H A N A T U R E A N D E X E R C I S E D I N S U C H A M A M M E N T I A T .'.. 'AN C.

R E S I S T I T ? I B E L I E V E H O T , I B E L I E V E T H E T E A C H I N G O F S C R I P T U R E T O BE L I K E W I S E C L E / , с U P O N

E V E R Y I N D I C A T I O N O F S C R I P T U R E I S T H A T E A C H P E R S O N E N T E R S I N T O L I F E . O R . C O N T I

P E R S O N E N T E R S I N T O C O N D E M N A T I O N A C C O R D I N G T O T H E R E S P O N S RLE M í C E S I T H E . ZPEL

J E S U S C H R I S T . T H E R E S P O N S E T H A T H E M A K E S T O T H E G C S P E L I S S T I L L D E P E N D E N T UPON : O D ,

C A U S E , A S W E H A V E S E E M . G O D H A D T O T A K E T H E I N I T I . T I V E I N P R O V I N I N 3 . V / A Y . 7 . .' A N

SAVED. W H A T W E A R E S A Y I N G I S T H A T G O D E L E C T S , в и т T H A T I N G O D ' S E L E C T I O N , H D O E I

H E D O E S л о т O V E R R U L E , H E D O E S N O T N E G A T E T N E F R E E D O M D F M A N , M A N ' S R I G H I O F с

' . V A S B E S T O W E D U P O N H I M A T C R E A T I O N , N O T A T T H E F A L L , H E H A D T H E г.: 7 C R E A Y L O A M D I

THE ! T A L L HAS TAKEN AV/AY FROM MAN THE RIGHT TO EXERCISE THE FREE MORAL AGE

. т о H I M , G O D W I L L N O T , G O D D O E S M O T . E X E R C I S E H I M S E L F I N S U C H « A Y S A S r o A I i I L T H E

MORAL AGENCY OF MAN.

I/RITERS OF THE N . T , coNs:~Ti7 :YLY л :

SP NSIBILITY TO THE INVITATION OF THE GOSPEL OF JESUS С и . ' П . З Т . INDEED т: 2 PRIMARY \ND CO:

.\PPE\L TO REPENTANCE AND FAITH IN THE WORD OF GOD P.�:ESUPP.' . •".: 'OM OF CH I :E ,

THE PART OF MAN. EVERY'APPEAL THAT T.:E SC � PTURE MAKES VD MAN ¡:PT- • . 7S TO

AS -. . : Т . ' . , AS A SPIRITUAL. AND AS A FERSCrAL 3EIMG. EvENY APPEAL THAT TH i 5CRI 7 'N.: •..

HE THAT SEEKS TO Р Е П З TO COERCE Hi M , GOû SEEK! Г О I JADE

•THROUGH THE ¡RRESI. 7 ... : " 7 7 ; OF HlS ETERI ' . . SPIRI! SUT H N SEEKS Г О Р Е

THROUGH THE DULY J NITED MEANS� �THROUGH TH" • Е А Т И OF JEU : : : . . . : : . ..'ГГ.. rir.'.

DEATH AMD STS BENEFITS THAT WE HAVE IN HiS ETN7> . WORD, THROl 7 . CHRISTI Y '

¡ THEY LIVE IN H I M AND AS INOiVIDUALS LOOKING AT C H R I S T I / I IS SEE LIS«

A L L OP THESE ARE MEANS BV WHICH GOI 7: . : .7 PERSUAI

Page 7: CHRIST FEBRUARY ;:. ISSO

PAGE 7

F R E E A.MOICE. C H R I S T I A N S . I N J O H N \G�.&�II W E F I N D T K A ' T I S M R I T CA..:E C O N V I C T OF

AND CF RIGHTEOUSNESS. AND OF JUDGMENT. THIS IS SIMPLY SAYtl ' GOD WHEN HE COMES :

T H E WORK OF T H E S P I R I T , A S H E EXERCISES H I S APPEAL THROUGH T H E WORD, SEEKS TO APPEA L T

WHOLE OF M A N — T O H I S EMOTIONS. TO H I S I N T E L L E C T , A N D TO H I S W I L L .

A L S O , L E T US NOT FORGET THAT G O D , I N H I S ELECTION, ELECTS ONLY TO SALVATION GOD D

E L E C T T O D A M N A T I O N . G O D D O E S NOT E L E C T A N Y M A M T O B E EL „ Y L D 3 T Q S . : L L W E ' V E

I T SEVERAL T I M E S . ( I I P E T E R 3 : э ) I S "THAT A L L MEM SHOULI TO REPENTANCE* " M E N MAY PE

MEN W I L L P E R I S H . BUT THEY W I L L NOT PERISH BECAUSE GO DESIRES I T OR HAS PREDETERMINED 17.

ROMANS 10:1 P A U L PRAYED THAT HIS FELLCV/ ISRAELITES M I G H T BE S A V E D . H E S/ I D , "BRETHREN

HEART'S DESIRE AMD PR'.YER TO GOO FOR ISRAEL SS, THAT THEY MIGHT BE SAVED • W H Y . P A U L ? I F

GOD HAS ALREADY PREDESTINED SOME OF T H E M TO ETERNAL D A M A N T I O N , SHOULD I*OU 3 E CONCERN

T H E APOSTLE P E T E R I N II P E T E R I : ю WROTE TO CHRISTIAN S AND я I D 'MAKE YOU C A L L I N G A M C EL

TIOM S U R E . " W H Y BE WORRIED ABOUT I T I F I T I S ALREADY PREDETERMINED A N D CERTAIN BY T H E EVE..

DECREE OF GOD?

GOD ELECTS MEM TO SALVATION NOT TO DAMNATION A N O TONIGHT I F YOU A R E L O S T , I T I S HOT B;

GOD W I L L S I T . A N D I F TONIGHT YOU ARE L O S T , I T I S NOT BECAUSE GOD HAS ORDA ; ;г :о �, ..AT NOT.;

B E A B L E T O B E DOME FOR Y O U . IL� YOU A R E L O S T T O N I G H T . I T I S B E C A U S E YOU HA /I T H I S M O I

O F T I M E BY YOUR OWN C H O I C E T U R N E D YOUR H A C K U P O N J E I I U S A M D I L ' S W O R K U P O N T H E C R O S S . і т I S

C A U S E E V E R Y A P P E A L T H A T G O D I A S M A D E T O Y O U T H R O U G H T H E M A N I F E S T A T I O N O F H L S ' . ' O V E S E E .

ZENITH I N JESUS C H R I S T , THROUGH T K E ATONING BENEFITS OF T H E BLOOD ~�F J E S U S , THROUGH EV :

T H A T C A N е е M A D E T H R O U G H H L S W O R D T O V O U R S P I R I " , Y O U : S O U L . Y O U ? E M O T I O N S A N D Y O U R '

КЛ VE CHOSEN TO REJECT« THEY HAVE GONE FOR .NAUGHT. TONIGHT THAT «CAN ALL :GED ÍT CA

CHANGE BY AN ACT OF PURE V/ ILL, BY YOUR SAYING. r'INO LONGER AM i GOING TO REFUSE, No LONGER .7

GOING TO REJECT. N o LONGER AM 1 GOING TO SAY NO TO GOD. I AM 30IM1 TO SAY, YES GOD. ' I AM

GOING TO SAV, " 'YES, I KNOW YOU LOVE M E . " I AM GOING TO SAY. *YES, 5 KNOW JESUS DIED FC

I AM GOING TO BAY. " Y E S . BECAUSE I KNOW THAT THE INVITATION OF JESUS IS NOT LIMITED BUT SS TO

"WHOSOEVER WILL LET HIM COME," AND I WILL, I 'M DOMMIG.'' WOULD VOU. WHILE WE STAND AMD Wi

V/E St MG?