Chinese Brands Go Global - CompuMark · 04 COMPUMARK CHINA TRADEMARK REPORT 2018 Following in the...
Transcript of Chinese Brands Go Global - CompuMark · 04 COMPUMARK CHINA TRADEMARK REPORT 2018 Following in the...
01
Chinese Brands Go Global
C H I N A T R A D E M A R K R E P O R T 2 018
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 03
ContentsAUTHOR'S INTRODU CTIO N 04
BACKGROUND 06
CHINESE APPLICANTS — FOREIGN TRADEMARK A P P L IC ATIO N S 09
Annual F i l l ing Volum e S in ce 2012 10
Ke y Registers 12
One Belt and One Road 14
Growth 15
Top Chinese Appl ican ts — Fore ign Trademark A p p l icat ion s in 2016 16
COUNTRY / REGION A N A LYSIS 19
Where Did Chinese A p p l ican ts F i l e Trademark Appl icat ion s in 2017? 20
Top F i lers Of Fore ig n Trad em ar k s 21
Top F i lers Of Fore ig n Trad em ar k s — Trends 22
Internat ional Regist rat ion s — Top Appl icants By O w n er Coun tr y 24
Internat ional Regist rat ion s — Most Frequent ly Des ig n ated Coun tr ies 25
CL ASSIFICATION AN D IN DUSTRY A N A LYSIS 27
Nice Class Dist r ibut ion — Foreig n Appl icat ions By Chin ese A p p l ican ts 28
Chinese Trademarks — Com par in g Foreig n and Domest ic Appl i cat ion s 30
Industr y Sector Dist r ibut ion 32
Indu str y Se ctor Growth — Foreign Trademark Appl icat ions 2012 to 2017 34
Nice C las s Dist r ib u t ion 2017 — Goods Vers u s Se r v ice 36
CHINA BY REGION 39
Sou rce Of Fore ign Trade mark Appl icat ions By C hines e Appl icants 40
TRADEMARKS AROUND THE WORLD 43
Annu al Growth Of Major Trademark Registe rs 44
Large st Registers By Annu al F i l ing Volu me 46
SUCCESS RATES 51
C ompu mark Su cces s Index — Su cces s Rate Ac hie ve d By C hines e Appl icants 52
C ompu mark Su cces s Index 53
Trademark Best Pract ice s — F i l ing Internat ional ly 54
BEST PRACTICES FROM MAINL AND CHINA 57
Be st Prat ices f rom Mainland C hina 58
CONCLUSION 61
COMPUMARK — HELPING BRANDS OWNERS GO GLOBAL 62
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201804
Following in the footsteps of mainland China’s domestic trademark register, which is the largest in the world, Chinese brands are now appearing on foreign trademark registers in increasingly large numbers.
CompuMark™ has been tracking the drive from mainland China to build global brands, and this report shows that – in just four years – Chinese brands have gone from number 10 in the world by filing volume to number two, and are likely to be challenging US brands for number one in the world in 2018.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 05
INTRODUCTION
Four years ago, CompuMark™ wrote a landmark report looking at Chinese brands in a global environment. Back in 2014, Chinese trademark activity was increasing at an unprecedented rate — applications on the Chinese domestic trademark register had broken the two million barrier (the first register in history to reach this milestone), and foreign trademark applications by Chinese applicants were at 30,000 and growing by more than 10% per annum.
In 2014, these figures felt colossal – they represented growth and volume that the trademark world had never seen before. But looking back from our 2018 vantage point, they seem relatively small in scale compared to what has followed.
In 2017, the Chinese domestic trademark register saw more than 5.2 million applications filed1 , approximately ten times the size of the world’s second largest register (the USA). In the first week of September 2017, there were more than 116,000 applications filed on the Chinese register – more than were filed on the EUIPO register in the whole of 2016.2 Chinese applicants filed nearly 120,000 foreign applications in 2017 – if this was
a separate register it would rank between Mexico (138,400) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (118,762) as the 8th largest register in the world. Chinese applicants filed one in every nine US applications in 2017 – more than 50,000 applications in a single year.
The statistics alone are remarkable, but more importantly they tell a story. Trademark applications are a powerful indicator of economic activity. They contain information on markets (registry country), time (filing date), source (applicant country) and business activity (classes and specifications). They can be used to see where a journey has started, the route it has taken, and where it is leading.
With access to the world’s largest trademark record library3 and 50+ years of analytical expertise, CompuMark™ is uniquely placed to track this journey and to tell the story of Chinese brands on the world stage. It’s quite a story.
Robert ReadingDirector, Custom & Managed SolutionsCompuMarkMay 2018
1. The Chinese Trademark Office started accepting multi-class applications from 1st May 2014, but the vast majority of applications are filed covering just a single class (98.6% of all applications in 2017).
2. 113,670 EUTM applications were filed in 2016.3. SAEGIS® – 62.6 million active records, 186 trademark registers, over 200 countries.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201806
For over 20 years, the Chinese trademark register has seen more trademark applications filed annually than any other register in the world. With over 1.4 billion consumers, the Chinese market is seen as a key target for international brands.
Although mainland China has just under 19% of the world’s population, the Chinese trademark register has seen over 50% of all trademark applications filed globally in recent years. And the proportion of global trademark applications filed in mainland China is still growing.
BACKGROUND
The Chinese trademark register has seen over 50% of all trademark applications filed globally in recent years.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 07
2016
2016
2017
2017
18.8% 18.7%
53.9% 59.6%
Figure 1 : Chinese population as a proportion of the world population
Figure 2 : Trademark applications in mainland China as a proportion of global trademark applications
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 09
1 : Chinese Applicants – Foreign Trademark Applications
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201810
When CompuMark™ last looked at the Chinese trademark sector in 2014, foreign trademark applications filed by Chinese applicants outside of mainland China were relatively modest.
Growth was steady but not spectacular (14% in 2013 compared with 2012), and mainland China ranked 10th in the world4 with the USA, Germany, UK, Italy and France making up the Top Five for filing foreign trademark applications.
4. WIPO Statistical Country Profile for China http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/country_profile/profile.jsp?code=CN
In 2017, mainland China ranked second in the world with the US, Hong Kong, Germany and UK making up the top five.
ANNUAL FILING VOLUME SINCE 2012
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 11
Figure 3 : Chinese applicants — foreign trademark applications 2012 – 2017
NU
MB
ER O
F AP
PLIC
ATIO
NS
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
-
FILING VOLUME
2012 2017201620152013 2014
The picture since 2014 has changed. Chinese applicants are now filing in significant numbers around the world, and in 2017 filed nearly 120,000 foreign trademark applications, with the number of foreign applications almost doubling in the last two years.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201812
The key registers for Chinese applicants filing trademark applications on registers outside of mainland China have traditionally been close neighbors of mainland China in South East Asia, together with the US and Europe.
Since 2014, the US has become the major market for Chinese brands, with US trademark applications growing almost exponentially from just over 6,200 in 2014 to over 50,000 in 2017. Europe (especially the EUIPO register) has moved into second position.
Since 2014 the US has become the major market for Chinese brands.
KEY REGISTERS
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 13
NU
MB
ER O
F AP
PLIC
ATIO
NS
(000
’S)
0.5
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
4.0
Figure 4 : Chinese applicants — top registers around the world (1 to 5)
NU
MB
ER O
F AP
PLIC
ATIO
NS
(000
’S)
10
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170
20
30
40
50
60 USA
EUIPO
Hong Kong
Taiwan
Japan
South Korea
Malaysia
IR (WIPO)*
UK
Australia
Figure 5 : Chinese applicants — top registers around the world (6 to 10)
* IR (WIPO) - IR refers to an International Registration, filed at the World Intellectual Property Office.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201814
The One Belt and One Road (OBOR)5 initiative is a Chinese project focusing on developing infrastructure and investment with mainland China’s neighbors and key trading partners. Among the regional and non-regional members of the OBOR initiative, Chinese trademark activity in 2016 was highest in South Korea and Australia, both with significant use of the Madrid system. Thailand – via national trademark applications – was also a key filing area.
South Korea
Australia
Thailand
Vietnam
Russia
Philippines
Turkey
Indonesia
Egypt
Saudi Arabia
Kenya
Pakistan
Figure 6 : OBOR trademark applications — Chinese applicants 2016
5001,000
1,5002,000
4,0003,000
3,5002,500
4,5005,000
National IR
5. For more information on OBOR, visit the official website: https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/
ONE BELT AND ONE ROAD
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 15
The recent growth rate in trademark applications from mainland China is higher than ever before. Application numbers increased by more than 40% in 2017 compared with 2016 on a number of major registers: the US register (+61%), Europe (EUIPO +55%), Japan (+73%), United Kingdom (+122%), Australia (+139%) and Canada (+49%):
U.S. Federal
EUTM
Hong Kong
Taiwan
Japan
South Korea
Malaysia
WIPO (IR)
United Kingdom
Australia
India
Thailand
Macao
Canada
Brazil
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
-20%0% 20%
40%60%
80%100%
120%140%
160%
Figure 7 : Top foreign registers for Chinese applicants — 2016 vs 2017
2016
Annual Growth
2017
GROWTH
NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201816
Looking at all trademark applications filed by Chinese applicants outside of mainland China, it is possible to compile a list of the applicants that filed the largest number of foreign trademark applications.
In 2016, Huawei Technologies (Telecommunications) was the leading Chinese brand in terms of foreign trademark applications. Huawei Technologies filed more than 1,800 foreign trademark applications around the world, more than 1,000 applications ahead of the LeEco group of companies in second place.
Some well known Chinese brands do not appear in the list as their trademarks are owned by an offshore holding company: Internet giants Alibaba (722 foreign trademark applications in 2016) and Tencent (345 applications) both use Cayman Islands based holding companies and would otherwise feature in the Top Five entries.
Applicant / Owner
1 Huawei Technologies Ltd2 Le Shi Holdings Ltd3 China Tobacco4 Beijing Xiaoju Technology Ltd5 Geely Holding Group Ltd6 Nextev Ltd 7 Shandong Weifang Tainbow Chemical Ltd8 Baidu Online Network Technology Ltd 9 Sanliuyidu (China) Ltd 10 Shenzhen Meixixi Catering Mananagement Ltd11 Great Wall Motor Company Ltd12 China Ocean Shipping (Group) 13 SZ DJI Technology Ltd 14 Beijing Qilin Hesheng Network Technology Ltd 15 Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Ltd16 Country Garden Estate Development Ltd17 Saic Motor Corporation Ltd18 China International Captial Corporation Ltd19 iCarbonX Ltd 20 Tianjin Lovol Heavy Industry Group Ltd21 CRRC Corporation Ltd22 Beijing Jingdong 360 Du E-Commerce Ltd23 YIWU Prudential Network Technology Ltd24 Reach Best Technology Ltd25 Shanghai Shangmei Cosmetics Ltd
1,878741366311267223222221201198191179175155150144144139139132124121120118109
2016 Applicant / Owner
26 China Resources Snow Breweries Ltd27 Zhejiang Supor Ltd28 Guangdong Alpha Animation and Culture Ltd29 Qingdao Sentury Tire Ltd30 Heilan Home Clothing Ltd31 Sichuan Haidilao Catering Ltd32 Quanjian Science & Tech Development Ltd33 ZTE Corporation 34 Gionee Communication Equipment Ltd35 Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Ltd36 Guilin GES Monk Fruit Corporation37 Zhejiang Junbao Communication Tech Ltd38 BYD Company Ltd39 Xiamen Meitu Network Technology Ltd40 Beijing Wangjiu Electronic Commerce Ltd41 Guangdong Saiman Investment Ltd42 China National Heavy Duty Truck Group Ltd43 Beijing Wangjiu Electronic Commerce Ltd44 CNNC Huayuan Titanium Dioxide Ltd45 East Shineray Holdings Ltd46 Postal Savings Bank of China47 Bestway Inflatables & Material Corp48 China National Petroleum Corp49 UC Mobile Ltd50 China Unionpay Ltd
108106104100
979088877776747372676462585757565554535352
2016
TOP CHINESE APPLICANTS – FOREIGN TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS IN 2016
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 17
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 19
2 : Country / RegionAnalysis
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201820
Looking at foreign trademark applications filed by applicants from mainland China in 2017, the global picture shows three key markets in order of importance:
WHERE DID CHINESE APPLICANTS FILE TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS IN 2017?
Higher Lower
1. USA 2. Europe 3. Countries and registers in
close geographical proximity to mainland China
Figure 8 : Top filers of foreign trademarks — 2017
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 21
In 2017, applicants from the United States continued to file more foreign trademark applications outside their domestic market than applicants from other countries/regions around the world. Applicants from mainland China are in second place (up from 10th place in 2014), with applicants from Hong Kong taking third place.
If foreign trademark applications from mainland China continue to grow at their current rate, mainland China is on course to overtake the USA as the world’s leading source of foreign trademark applications by 2020.
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
US
Mainland China
Hong Kong
Germany
UK
Japan
France
Switzerland
South Korea
Italy
Spain
Canada
Australia
Netherlands
Taiwan
National IR
WHERE DID CHINESE APPLICANTS FILE TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS IN 2017?
TOP FILERS OF FOREIGN TRADEMARKS BY OWNER COUNTRY/REGION
Figure 9 : Top filers of foreign trademarks — 2017
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201822
YEAR TRADEMARKS
Hong Kong Applicants
2010 32,5972011 44,6262012 60,2672013 73,805 2014 77,7932015 74,918 2016 63,232 2017 76,319
Germany Applicants
2010 67,2832011 73,4532012 70,7022013 68,374 2014 66,7902015 67,395 2016 74,076 2017 54,488
Mainland China Applicants
2010 32,0592011 38,3172012 42,9512013 48,5262014 54,3532015 67,2382016 94,6222017 119,126
United States Applicants
2010 169,7102011 197,8452012 208,9212013 200,459 2014 192,3622015 198,322 2016 188,447 2017 163,357
TOP FILERS OF FOREIGN TRADEMARKS BY OWNER COUNTRY/REGION – TRENDS
Figure 10 : Top filers of foreign trademarks by owner country/region
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 23
Japan Applicants
2010 57,8072011 65,2052012 80,5742013 62,1432014 58,2232015 56,8542016 53,1252017 43,234
Korea Applicants
2010 19,3992011 19,2222012 21,0062013 23,8742014 25,4672015 37,7632016 41,1152017 26,116
FranceApplicants
2010 41,2802011 49,0032012 47,9782013 46,7002014 43,5922015 43,9612016 42,4222017 32,884
Taiwan Applicants
2010 8,1382011 10,8392012 23,3672013 20,5822014 21,1762015 22,9662016 16,5272017 10,416
UnitedKingdom
Applicants
2010 44,1182011 50,1632012 53,6922013 55,2432014 54,6832015 54,4712016 54,7182017 44,149
Figure 10 : Top filers of foreign trademarks by owner country/region
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201824
The Madrid System – administered by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) in Geneva – allows brand owners to file a single trademark application internationally covering over 110 countries. Although mainland China became party to the Madrid Protocol in 1995, Chinese applicants have been reticent to use the International trademark system, preferring to file foreign applications directly with national registries.
In 2017, mainland China remained in fourth place (their 2016 position) among the leading filers of IR applications. While growth has been slower than for foreign trademark applications via national offices, mainland China is likely to overtake France and claim third place in 2018 among users of the International system.
Figure 11 : TOP IR (WIPO) applicants by owner country — 2017
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
US
Germany
France
Mainland China
Switzerla
nd
AustraliaIta
ly
JapanUK
Netherla
nds
RussiaSpain
South Korea
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATIONS (WIPO) – TOP APPLICANTS BY OWNER COUNTRY
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 25
Mainland China was the number one country designated by International Registrations filed at WIPO in 2016, just ahead of the EUIPO register and the USA. Over 22,500 IR applications designated mainland China in 2016, representing an increase of 5% compared with 2015.
Figure 12: Most designated registers — international registrations 2016 vs 2015
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Mainland China EU US
RussiaJapan
South Korea
Australia
India
Switzerla
nd
Mexico
Singapore
Turkey
Vietnam
Norway UK
Italy
Germany
France
2016 2015
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATIONS (WIPO) – MOST FREQUENTLY DESIGNATED COUNTRIES
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 27
3 : Classification and Industry Analysis
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201828
Trademarks around the world are filed using the Nice Classification system, where all physical products are divided into 34 goods classes (Nice Classes 1 to 34), and all services are divided into 11 service classes (Nice Classes 35 to 45).
By examining the most frequently used classes used by Chinese brands when filing foreign trademark applications, it is possible to build a picture of the most important types of products being exported from mainland China.
In 2017, Class 9 was the most frequently used class for foreign trademark applications filed by applicants from mainland China. Class 9 includes electronics and electrical equipment. Chinese applicants filed nearly 30,000 foreign trademark applications in 2017 in Class 9.
The second most frequently used class was Class 25, which covers clothing, footwear and headgear. The three most frequently used classes were all from the goods classes for physical products:
Class 9 Electronics/electrical equipment (19.9% of all applications)Class 25 Clothing/fashion (9.6%)Class 11 Lighting, heating, cooking, refrigerating apparatus (5.9%)
NICE CLASS DISTRIBUTION – FOREIGN APPLICATIONS BY CHINESE APPLICANTS
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Figure 13 : Foreign Trademark applications by Chinese applicants in 2017
— Nice Class Count
29COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018
CLASS 9
19.9%CLASS 11
5.9%CLASS 25
9.6%
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201830
There is a clear distinction between which classes of trademarks from mainland China are being filed domestically versus globally. While foreign trademark applications from mainland China mainly reflect physical products, the Chinese domestic register shows a higher proportion of service related brands.
Class 9 (electronics and electrical items) accounted for nearly 20% of all trademark “exports” in 2017, but only 6% of Chinese domestic trademark applications in the same period.
Each of the eleven service classes (Nice Classes 35 to 45) appeared at a lower rate on foreign applications than they appeared on the Chinese domestic trademark register.Trademark applications covering agricultural products and food and drink (Classes 29 to 33) were also “exported” at a significantly lower rate than they appear on the domestic register.
Figure 14 : Trademark applications by class. Chinese applicants, domestic vs foreign — 2017
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Domestic Foreign
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
CHINESE TRADEMARKS – COMPARING FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC APPLICATIONS
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 31
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201832
Construction
CLASSES
6 17 19 37 40
Health
CLASSES
3 5 10 44
Household EquipmentCLASSES
8 11 20 21
Leisure & EducationCLASSES
13 15 16 28 41
Agriculture
CLASSES
29 30 31 32 33 43
Business ServicesCLASSES
35 36
Chemicals
CLASSES
1 2 4
Clothing
CLASSES
14 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 34
The Nice Classification system for trademarks can be arranged so that classes that relate to specific industry sectors can be grouped together to allow analysis on an industry level.
Research & TechnologyCLASSES
9 38 42 45
Transport CLASSES
7 12 39
INDUSTRY SECTOR DISTRIBUTION
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 33
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Research & Technology
Clothing
Household Equipment
Leisure & Education
Transporta
tion
Constructio
n
Business Services
Agricultu
re
Health
Chemicals
Applying this grouping to foreign trademark applications filed from mainland China, the research and technology sector filed the most foreign trademark applications in 2017, followed by the clothing sector, and household equipment. While Class 9 was used far more frequently than other classes, once the other industry related classes are considered, the gap between the two leading industry sectors is relatively small.
Figure 15 : Foreign trademark applications by Chinese applicants in 2017 — by industry sector
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201834
The top three industry sectors for Chinese applicants filing overseas in 2017 have also been the three fastest growing industry sectors in recent years in terms of trademark application numbers.
Since 2013, foreign trademark applications from the research and technology, clothing, and household equipment sectors have been growing at 30% to 40% per year; in contrast the construction sector and the chemicals sector have seen very little growth since 2013 suggesting differences between the ease of export and access to external markets between industry sectors.
The research and technology, clothing, and household equipment sectors have been growing at 30% to 40% per year.
INDUSTRY SECTOR GROWTH – FOREIGN TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS 2012 TO 2017
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 35N
UM
BER
OF
APPL
ICAT
ION
S (0
00’S
)
5
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170
10
15
20
35
30
25
40
Figure 16 : Chinese foreign trademark applications by industry sector 2012-2017
Research & Technology
Clothing
Household Equipment
Transport
Health
Business Services
Agriculture
Construction
Chemicals
Leisure & Education
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201836
Using the Nice Classification split between physical goods (Class 1 to 34) and services (Classes 35 to 45), it is possible to make a comparison of the ratio between trademark applications for goods and for services on trademark registers.
Although service classes are less than 25% of the overall number of classes available (11 out of 45), around the world 40% of all trademark applications in 2017 were for services.
On the Chinese domestic register, the proportion of applications for services was just over 30% in 2017, lower than the global average. This suggests that the Chinese economy is predominantly based on physical goods rather than services.
When Chinese brand owners filed foreign trademark applications in 2017, the difference was even stronger. Less than 20% of the applications were for services, indicating that mainland China’s exports are mostly physical goods. Chinese service related brands are not yet exporting in significant numbers.
Less than 20% of the applications were for services, indicating that mainland China’s exports are mostly physical goods.
NICE CLASS DISTRIBUTION 2017 – GOODS VERSUS SERVICES
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 37
GLOBAL
All trademark registers around the world
Mainland China trademark register
DOMESTIC
Foreign applications filed by Chinese applicants
FOREIGN
Goods
Services
40% 60% 32% 68%
16% 84%
Figure 17 : Goods vs services 2017
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 39
4 : Mainland China by Region
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201840
Guangdong Province (Shenzhen and Guangzhou) dominates foreign applications by mainland Chinese applicants – nearly half of all foreign trademark applications in 2016 (46.7%) were filed by applicants using an address in Guangdong Province.
Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou and Ningbo) was the second largest source of foreign trademark applications in 2016, with 11.8% of all foreign applications filed by Mainland Chinese applicants. Beijing Municipality was third, with Shanghai Municipality fourth.
SOURCE OF FOREIGN TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS BY MAINLAND CHINESE APPLICANTS
Jiangsu 2,554 3.9%
Fujian 2,479 3.8%
Tianjin 1,375 2.1%
Sichuan 937 1.4%
Hunan 800 1.2%
Anhui 758 1.2%
Henan 758 1.2%
Hebei 738 1.1%
Hubei 691 1.1%
Jiangxi 569 0.9%
Chongqing 496 0.8%
Jilin 325 0.5%
Liaoning 316 0.5%
Guangxi 269 0.4%
Shanxi 235 0.4%
Yunnan 188 0.3%
Shaanxi 155 0.2%
Heilongjiang 132 0.2%
Inner Mongolia 100 0.2%
Guizhou 81 0.1%
Hainan 75 0.1%
Gansu 67 0.1%
Tibet 40 0.1%
Xinjiang 36 0.1%
Ningxia 16 0.0%
Qinghai 10 0.0%
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 41
1. GUANGDONG
30,36046.7%
2. ZHEJIANG
7,68811.8%
3. BEIJING
5,7288.8%
4. SHANGHAI
4,0336.2%
5. SHANDONG
2,9394.5%
Figure 18 : Top 5 sources of foreign trademark applications 2016
1
2
3
4
5
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 43
5 : Trademarks Around the World
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201844
Mainland China continued to be the fastest growing major trademark register in 2017, with growth of nearly 50% compared with 2016 filing numbers. The UK also saw signif-icant growth in 2017, due to the uncertainty of “Brexit” for brand protection in the UK.
The strong growth in the number of applications filed on the Chinese trademark register in 2017 was partly driven by a significant reduction in the cost of filing a domestic trademark application in mainland China in April 2017.
ANNUAL GROWTH OF MAJOR TRADEMARK REGISTERS
-20%-10% 0% 10%
20%30%
40%50%
Mainland China
United Kingdom
Japan
U.S. Federal
Mexico
Brazil
Turkey
Taiwan
EU trade marks
Germany
France
Argentina
South Korea
India
2016
2017
Figure 19 : Annual growth in application numbers — major registers
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 45
Figure 20 : Monthly filing volume — Mainland China and India
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
Jan ‘16
Feb ‘16
Mar ‘16
Apr ‘16
May ‘16
Jun ‘16
Jul ‘16
Aug ‘16
Sep ‘16
Oct ‘16
Nov ‘16
Dec ‘16
Jan ‘17
Feb ‘17
MAR ‘17
Apr ‘17
May ‘17
Jun ‘17
Jul ‘17
Aug ‘17
Sep ‘17
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Jan ‘16
Feb ‘16
Mar ‘16
Apr ‘16
May ‘16
Jun ‘16
Jul ‘16
Aug ‘16
Sep ‘16
Oct ‘16
Nov ‘16
Dec ‘16
Jan ‘17
Feb ‘17
MAR ‘17
Apr ‘17
May ‘17
Jun ‘17
Jul ‘17
Aug ‘17
Sep ‘17
MONTHLY FILING VOLUME
-16% India
+74% Mainland ChinaMONTHLY FILING VOLUME
This is in contrast to the Indian trademark register which saw a significant decline in filing numbers over the same period, after the official fee was increased significantly in March 2017.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201846
Mainland China continues to dominate world trademark filing numbers, with the Chinese register accepting more than 5 million new applications in 2017. The USA and India fill the next two positions, but neither of these registers are growing at the same rate as the Chinese register. Among Asian registers, Japan and South Korea also made the Top 10 in 2017.
Mainland China was the world’s largest trademark register for new applications in 2017, with more than 12 times as many applications than the second placed US register, and nearly 20 times as many applications than India in third place.
Mainland China continues to dominate world trademark filing numbers, with the Chinese register accepting more than 5 million new applications in 2017.
LARGEST REGISTERS BY ANNUAL FILING VOLUME
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 47
Figure 21 : Annual trademark applications — top registers by filing volume
NU
MB
ER O
F AP
PLIC
ATIO
NS
(MIL
LIO
NS)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
MAINLAND CHINA1,581,533 1,785,355 2,090,957 2,629,170 3,603,746 5,270,801
US300,060 309,986 327,879 358,951 377,406 425,791
INDIA191,678 202,491 216,449 275,395 296,324 263,732
BRAZIL109,102 161,496 154,157 156,860 161,912 177,005
JAPAN106,931 103,601 111,355 130,882 147,679 173,331
SOUTH KOREA128,709 135,992 142,609 163,131 162,381 160,758
MEXICO101,306 104,330 109,039 118,681 126,034 138,403
EUTM81,953 85,401 92,349
105,280 113,670 118,762
ARGENTINA80,478 80,047 76,579 89,692
101,139 102,643
TURKEY91,216 87,910 91,861 93,293 92,541 99,668
FRANCE81,947 84,307 87,207 91,575 88,329 90,299
TAIWAN65,409 66,421 74,743 78,830 79,489 83,279
UK36,723 46,317 51,037 54,282 61,636 75,010
GERMANY44,700 44,900 49,540 69,035 68,910 71,561
20122013 2014 2015 2016 2017
20122013 2014 2015 2016 2017
20122013 2014 2015 2016 2017
2012 2017201620152013 2014
Mainland China
Rest of the World
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201848
Figure 22 : Top trademark registers — annual filing volume
MAINL AND CHINA
USA
MEXICO
EUTM
ARGENTINA
BRAZIL
JAPAN
SOUTH KOREA
UNITED KINGDOM
INDIA
TURKEY
FR ANCE
GERMANY
TAIWAN
Even adjusting for population – mainland China is the world’s most populous country – the Chinese register led the world in 2017, with more than 3,500 trademark applications filed per one million people, ahead of the Taiwanese trademark register and South Korea:
Mainland China was the world’s largest trademark register for new applications in 2017, with more than 12 times as many applications than the second placed US register, and nearly 20 times as many applications than India in third place.
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
Mainland ChinaUSA
IndiaBra
zil
Japan
Argentina
MexicoEUTM
South Korea
Turkey
United Kingdom
France
Taiwan
Germany
Figure 23 : Top trademark registers 2017 — trademark applications per million population
= 400 Applications
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 49
The one measure where mainland China still lags behind other major trademark registers is GDP per trademark application (in $US million). This is an indicator of the relative economic value of each application. On this measure, the German
trademark register led the world in 2017, with GDP per trademark application of $US 47.8M. The USA was second at $US 45.6M per trademark application. Mainland China was in last place among major registers, with GDP per trademark application of $US 2.2M.
Figure 24 : Top trademark registers 2017 — GDP per trademark application ($US thousand)
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
Germany
USA UKJapan
France
Mexico
South Korea
IndiaBra
zil
Taiwan
Argentina
Mainland China
SOURCE: International Monetary Fund April 2017 forecast http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/01/weodata/weorept.aspx
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 51
6 : Success Rates
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201852
CompuMark™ uses a metric called the CompuMark Success Index to measure the registration vs failure rate of trademark applications. The CompuMark Success Index indicates how many applications are registered for each unsuccessful application; the higher the score, the better the success rate. Applications to register a trademark can be expensive investments for brand owners, so maximizing the chance of an application leading to a registration is a valuable strategy.
Chinese applicants filing trademark applications on major trademark registers in 2016 achieved a CompuMark Success Index that was significantly higher than the register average in each major register. In the EUIPO, Japanese and UK registers, Chinese applicants were two to three times more successful in having applications reach registration than the market average.
This success is likely to be due to the distinctive and relatively unique nature of the marks being applied for – particularly if they use Chinese words or Chinese characters – which means they are unlikely to conflict with existing rights already on the register. However, as more Chinese marks reach foreign registers the likelihood of conflict will undoubtedly increase, and success rates may fall as a result.
COMPUMARK SUCCESS INDEX – SUCCESS RATE ACHIEVED BY CHINESE APPLICANTS
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 53
COMPUMARK SUCCESS INDEX
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
US EU AustraliaJapan Korea UK
Chinese applicants
All applicants
CompuMark Success Index = Registration Rate / Failure Rate
Figure 25 : CompuMark Success Index — 2016 applications
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201854
Do your homeworkGlobal brand owners usually screen (simple online checks) and search potential marks before they file applications to avoid expensive mistakes.
They check for existing records on each register that might stop them using their mark locally – existing marks that are too close will act as a block.
Understand the local rulesWestern registers have different rules.The USA has special requirements regarding proof of use. These requirements are quite specific, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office has recently announced a pilot scheme to target fraudulent specimens of use. The EU and UK Trademark Offices do not require proof of use, but a mark may be cancelled after five years if someone challenges it and you can’t prove that it is in commercial use.
Some registers will reject an application if it is too close to existing marks on the register (e.g. USA); other registers will not check for similar records and rely on other owners to file an opposition. It is important to be aware of deadlines for responding to examination reports and oppositions.
Protect your brandSome registers (e.g. USA) will stop other applicants from registering marks that are too close to your brand.
Other registers (e.g. EU, UK) will NOT stop other applicants from registering marks that are too close – you need to constantly check for possibly infringing applications and file an opposition if necessary to stop them. The best way to do this is to have a trademark watch service – this will automatically tell you if someone tries to file an application that is too similar to your brand.
Get local helpEven before filing an application, try to find a law firm in each country who can help you if you have a problem. If a problem happens, often the deadline for responding is very short and if you don’t know someone locally who can help, you might not have time.
Consider using the international (WIPO – Madrid Protocol) systemMany international brand owners use the International (WIPO – Madrid Protocol) system. The Madrid Protocol International system has a number of very important advantages:
• Very cost effective – no law firm fees for filing
• Simple administration – one form can cover over 100 countries
• The international system is quick as it requires countries to meet rules about examination times; if an application is not examined quickly it can become registered automatically.
TRADEMARK BEST PRACTICES – FILING INTERNATIONALLY
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 55
NATIONAL
115,469
WIPO-IR
3,563
While filing through the Madrid Protocol international system has a number of advantages, less than 3% of foreign trademark applications filed by
Chinese applicants were filed via WIPO.
Figure 26 : Foreign trademark applications filed by Chinese applicants — 2017
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 57
7 : Best Practices From Mainland China
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201858
How do you decide in which jurisdictions to protect your brands?
COFCO: We will select target overseas countries/regions based on our strategic operation plan and the local policies relating to intellectual property rights in these countries/regions. Generally, in addition to the areas in which our businesses operate, some other areas of strategic significance will also be selected.
BEIQI FOTON: In terms of trademark protection, we have always stressed that “trademark registration comes before product selling.” For a new brand, we will first of all list the countries to file the trademark according to the product plan and anticipated market demand proposed by our business department, and then we will investigate the trademark’s availability in the listed overseas countries to confirm the risks of conflict. In this way, we will decide whether the name is available and in which countries we will register it.
How do you advise on strategies for filing trademarks overseas?
WANHUIDA PEKSUNG: We recommend that trademark applicants consider the following:
• The trademark requirements in the countries where the products will be exported, the classification and specifications of the products per se, and the company’s competitive strength are all crucial in making a well-targeted registration plan
• Trademark registration should be obtained locally before exporting the products to that country. Since the registration requirements vary from country to country, filing strategies may need to be adjusted to meet local requirements
• A comprehensive plan should be developed by considering the representation and language of the trademark, the goods/services, and the sequence of filing in different countries and regions
• The registration is advised to cover the goods per se as well as the services relating to the goods, which is effective to protect against squatting
• The name and address of the applicant should be consistent or else its own prior registration or application may cited as an obstacle to a later application, incurring unnecessary expenditure to reply to the refusal
• Take advantage of regional trademark registration systems such as the EUTM, the Madrid/IR system, OAPI and ARIPO in Africa to control the budget
• Carefully select the timing for registration and utilize prior rights if they exist. Familiarise yourself with the provisions of international or regional treaties, agreements, laws and regulations, combine them with your own practice and file your trademark application overseas without delay
To better understand how Chinese brand owners approach filing foreign trademark applications and managing a global portfolio, CompuMark™ spoke with Mr. Haifeng Qian, General Counsel & Director at Beiqi Foton Motor Co. Ltd., Mr. Hui Huang, Senior Partner and Ms. Jianping Li, Trademark Consultant at Wanhuida Peksung IP Group, and Mr. Bing Zhu, General Manager (Legal Department) at China National Cereals, Oils and Foodstuffs Corporation (COFCO).
BEST PRACTICES FROM MAINLAND CHINA
Bing ZhuHaifeng Qian Hui Huang Jianping Li
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 59
How do you research trademark availability when filing outside China?
BEIQI FOTON: Before 2013, we entrusted trademark agents and/or law firms within each specific country to investigate trademark availability. However, since 2014, we have used the SAEGIS® global database to locate potential conflicts and to clear new trademarks around the world, which has significantly shortened our screening time and saved our costs.
What difference do you see when filing overseas compared to in China?
BEIQI FOTON: When filling overseas, each country has its differences compared to China in terms of legal environment, cost and efficiency. Firstly, the cost of overseas trademark filling can be relatively high. Before a brand hits the market, its global trademark registration arrangements require a significant investment, and if there are subsequent objections or lawsuits, the cost can be higher. Secondly, the time for trademark authorization in overseas countries is quite long.
Some countries have low inspection efficiency so that it may take seven to eight years to get the certificate. If there is lawsuit or some other complexities, the time of filling is more unpredictable. Thirdly, the inspection procedures vary from one country to another. In China, substantive review for trademark filling is employed, while in other countries (EU for example), formal review is adopted which indicates that the trademark will be registered three months after publication without any objections, and this means global trademark monitoring is particularly important.
WANHUIDA PEKSUNG: Apart from an array of differences in costs, examination periods and grounds, there are also significant procedural differences. For instance, it is not unusual that evidence of use or a statement of use is required to be filed in order to obtain registration, and the voluntary submission of trademark use is mandatory even after the registration of trademark in many jurisdictions. Such practice requires that the registration of a trademark is only sustained by voluntary and continuous filing of evidence of use or statement of use.
It is rather common practice in China to file a trademark in respect of as many similar subgroups under one class in order to maximize its scope of protection. The use of such practice in outbound trademark applications may risk the application being rejected in some countries/regions (such as Hong Kong, Japan and South Korea), where in the absence of a partial rejection mechanism, the overlapping of or conflict between some goods or services may result in total refusal of the application. In such circumstance, the applicant needs to choose wisely and precisely which goods or services he chooses to seek for the protection of his trademark. Moreover, it would be advisable to run a rough check on one’s own overseas trademark portfolio to avoid filings being obstructed by and refused on the basis of an own prior mark.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201860
What challenges do you see when filing trademarks overseas?
COFCO: Countries in different geographic locations often have differences in legal systems and languages, and as a result, we feel it is best to work with local agencies, which has significant negative impact on efficiency as it is after all a kind of indirect communication.
Do you use the WIPO Madrid International Registration system? If so, why? If not, why?
BEIQI FOTON: We usually register international trademarks through Madrid system, because it’s very convenient. Under this system, one filling can be applied in more than 100 countries. The Madrid system also has time and cost benefits after registration with simplified processes for owner changes and renewal.
COFCO: We use the Madrid system in our overseas filing, but also file national applications. The decision on which registration system to use is primarily made according to the actual needs of our business. National applications are the only option in countries which are not part of the Madrid system.
How do you select partners to help with your overseas filings?
BEIQI FOTON: Generally, we choose our partners based on considerations of professionalism, experience, promptness of feedback and effectiveness of problem solving.
COFCO: We generally select our partners based on the following factors:
1. Their clients, which can be a useful indication of their capabilities and reputation
2. Their position in industry rankings and the honors they have gained
3. Their experience and size – experience and stability are very important
WANHUIDA PEKSUNG: When selecting partners, we adhere to the principle of “reliable + efficient.” Commission fees will be considered but it’s not the decisive factor. We care more about the partner’s professionalism and credibility. More specifically, the partner selection can be categorized into easy cases and complicated cases. For straightforward cases, we will search for agencies which can offer reasonable price, quick feedback and fair quality. Overseas agencies can be found from INTA membership list. We will review the firm’s website to understand its date of establishment, the scale and scope of
business and its domestic ranking. In addition, information about the agencies can also be found in professional activities and on professional media platforms. For complicated cases, we normally choose well-known law firms with a good reputation. After the strict inspection of the law firm’s history, its international reputation and agent’s working experience, we will have a careful preliminary communication with the law firm on the case and then make the best choice according to specific situations.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 61
Mainland China has featured prominently on the radar of global brand owners for a number of years, with its allure as the world’s largest single market and over 1.3 billion consumers each with growing purchasing power and relatively untapped access to global markets.
While the primary focus within mainland China has been to build a strong domestic trademark register – with unrivalled success in terms of filing numbers – Chinese brands are now looking outward. Chinese brand owners need to develop a strategy when building a global brand, including how to overcome the challenges posed by different
trademark registers around the world, how to build a network of partners around the world, and how to protect and enforce their brand once it is registered.
If recent trends continue, trademark registers outside of mainland China – particularly in the US and Europe – are likely to see Chinese applicants playing a significant role in their markets, with the very real possibility that these registers could look very different in terms of their make-up and volume within the next four-year cycle.
CONCLUSION
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 201862
CompuMark™, a business unit of Clarivate Analytics, enables trademark professionals worldwide to launch, expand and protect strong brands through unmatched global content, expert analysis and tools, and best-in-class service.
We are devoted to helping IP professionals – both in-house and law firm counsel – meet the challenges of brand creation and protection in today’s rapidly evolving, global, digital landscape.
We provide the entire clearance and protection process – with the added advantage of choice – including SAEGIS® – a self-service screening tool to narrow down the choice of a trademark; TM go 365 ™ – a self-service clearance tool that enables you to finalize the choice of a trademark yourself; and the analyst-driven Full Availability Search, the industry’s gold standard for finalizing the choice of a trademark.
SAEGIS® on SERION®
TM go 365TMFull Availability
SearchWatch on SERION ®
Global online “knock-out” search
Innovative, self-serviceclearance solution
The gold standard trademark clearance search
Protection trusted by the world’s most valuable brands
SCREENING CLEARANCE PROTECTION
Self-Service Solutions Analyst Solutions
COMPUMARK – HELPING BRAND OWNERS GO GLOBAL
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 63
Trademark ScreeningIs your proposed trademark unique? In today’s global marketplace, potential conflicts could be lurking in jurisdictions around the world. Eliminating these marks early in the clearance process with a “knock-out” search saves time and money, allowing you to focus resources on the most promising candidates. The solution is SAEGIS® on SERION®, which provides instant access to 186 trademark registers covering over 200 countries and over 70 million trademark records.
Trademark ClearanceTM go 365™ Why take chances trying to clear important brands using web searches or inaccurate online tools? CompuMark™ has a better solution: TM go 365™. It’s the ultimate self-service clearance solution that gives you the power to search word and image trademarks instantly and globally, without compromising quality. So you can minimize brand risk while keeping pace with the digital economy.
TM go 365™ combines our deep trademark search expertise with advanced machine learning and image recognition technology to deliver results you can count on to make critical brand decisions, quickly and cost-effectively.
Full Availability SearchWith hundreds of thousands of new brands entering the global marketplace annually, the risk of infringement has never been greater. Performing a thorough search of any new trademark, business name or domain name is essential to reduce the risk of a conflict that could cost millions in litigation costs, delayed market entry and lost marketing investments.
Our Full Availability Search is the solution. Performed by our expert Search Analysts, it’s the industry gold standard, providing unparalleled coverage and quality to give you the certainty to make trademark investments with confidence.
Trademark Watching Rising global trademark filings. Proliferating online and offline channels. Exploding social media and web content. Valuable brands are more vulnerable to infringement than ever before. CompuMark™ helps you meet the challenge with the broadest, most reliable global watch coverage and the most efficient watch management tools.
Custom & Managed SolutionsSome trademark challenges just don’t fit existing services. That’s where our Custom & Managed Solutions come in. Our trusted and experienced team develops innovative, practical solutions tailored to your precise needs. From complex project management to trademark data analytics for competitive and business intelligence needs. No matter what the challenge, we’re committed to a single mission: achieving your trademark research, clearance and protection goals.
The Next Generation of Trademark Research and Protection SolutionsThe trademark landscape is always evolving—and so is CompuMark™. We are continually developing innovative new solutions, leveraging advanced technologies and our global expertise to help our customers meet whatever challenges come their way.
COMPUMARK CHINA TR ADEMARK REPORT 2018 65
ABOUT COMPUMARKCompuMark ™ is the industry leader in trademark research and protection solutions. We enable trademark and brand professionals worldwide to launch, expand and protect strong brands through the highest quality global content; expert analysis; superior trademark screening, search, and watch tools; and best-in-class service. Key products include: SAEGIS® Trademark Screening Tools; TM go 365 ™ DIY Clearance Solution; Trademark Full Search; Trademark Watching; Copyright Searches; and Custom Solutions.
To learn more about how CompuMark ™ can help with your trademark search and protection needs, visit us at compumark.com
To contact CompuMark™ regarding the information in this report, or for general enquiries, please visit compumark.com/contact-us/
ABOUT CLARIVATE ANALYTICSClarivate Analytics is the global leader in providing trusted insights and analytics to accelerate the pace of innovation. Building on a heritage going back more than a century and a half, we have built some of the most trusted brands across the innovation lifecycle, including CompuMark, Web of Science, Cortellis, Derwent, MarkMonitor and Techstreet. Today, Clarivate Analytics is a new and independent company on a bold entrepreneurial mission to help our clients radically reduce the time from new ideas to life-changing innovations.
For more information, please visit clarivate.com
AMERICASMain office (USA) : +1 (800) 692 [email protected]
CANADA +1 (800) 561 [email protected]
EMEAMain office (Belgium) : + 32 2 200 89 [email protected]
UK+44 020 3564 [email protected]
FRANCE +33 01 57 32 47 [email protected]
ITALY +39 02 23 33 [email protected]
GERMANY +49 69 153 253 [email protected]
ASIAJapan: +81 03 [email protected]
CHINA+86 [email protected]
AUSTRALASIA+61 2 8587 [email protected]
Clarivate and its logo as well as CompuMark™, SAEGIS®, SERION® and TM go365™ are trademarks of the Clarivate Analytics group. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.