China’s Participation in the UN Security Council Joel Wuthnow [email protected] Hong Kong...
-
Upload
ambrose-sparks -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of China’s Participation in the UN Security Council Joel Wuthnow [email protected] Hong Kong...
1
China’s Participation in the UN Security Council
Joel [email protected]
Hong Kong Political Science AssociationAugust 21, 2009
2
Argument
• China has become a highly engaged actor in the UN Security Council, which itself has taken a much more active role in collective security since the end of the Cold War.
• China’s positions in Council deliberations are pragmatic and instrumental, not ideological. It is especially motivated by two calculations: strategic interests and political reputation vis-à-vis the international community.
3
The Post-Cold War Security Council
• Cold War: superpower contestation; frequent vetoes; few sanctions; “traditional” peacekeeping; rare invocation of Chapter VII of the UN Charter.
• Post-Cold War: consensus-oriented; few vetoes; adoption of sanctions; “non-traditional peacekeeping;” frequent use of Chapter VII.
4
The UNSC: Cold War vs. Post-19901946-1989 1990-2008
Security Council meetings/year
67.5 166.1
Vetoes/year 5.3 (1946-1985) 2.4 (1986-2009)
Resolutions/year 15 63.8
Chapter VII Resolutions - Total
8 423
New Sanctions Committees – Total
2 21
New Peacekeeping Operations – Total
18 45
Peacekeeping Personnel 17,900 (1989) 91,300 (2009)
5
China’s Path to Engagement
• 1971-1982: Passive learner. Frequent abstentions on peacekeeping votes. Aligned with the Third World.
• 1982-1992: Increasing engagement. Begins to take initiative.
• 1992-present: Active engagement. Approval of most resolutions. Participation in PKOs.
6
Voting with the Rest
1971-1981
1982-1985
1986-1990
1991-2000
2001-2008
0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%
100.00%
voting for passed resolutions
voting for passed resolu-tions
7
China’s Troop Contribution to UN Peacekeeping
2000 2002 2004 2006 20080
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
ChinaUSAFrance
8
China’s Strategic Rationale
• The Security Council as a vehicle to check U.S. unilateralism.
• Building an image of a “responsible great power” that accepts pre-existing institutions and norms.
• Veto power inherent influence on a range of regional issues, from East Asia to the Middle East to Africa.
9
Cooperativeness
• Post-Cold War voting record: 4 vetoes, 49 abstentions, 1149 affirmative votes. Worked to keep Iraq (2003) off the agenda.
• Contention difficult to observe, because most of it will have happened prior to the final text that is voted on.
• Nevertheless, China’s position impacts the extent to which others (e.g. the West) is able to accomplish viz. sanctions, PKO mandates.
10
Chinese vetoes, 1990-2008Date Issue Effect Reason Note
1/10/1997 Guatemala Prevent military observer mission
Taiwan
2/25/1999 Macedonia Discontinue UNPREDEP mission
Taiwan
1/12/2007 Myanmar Fail to condemn Myanmar regime
jurisdiction w/ Russia
7/11/2008 Zimbabwe Fail to approve sanctions
Jurisdiction w/ Russia
11
Two Logics of Action
• Logic of Appropriateness: Positions determined by consistency with prior-established norms and values. China’s positions should be based on sovereignty concerns, non-use of force.
• Logic of Consequences: Positions determined in relation to material (economic/security) interests. China should respond to two types of calculations: strategic and political.
12
Cases: North Korea & Sudan
• North Korea: Nuclear detonation prompts re-evaluation of strategy support for Chapter VII resolutions, new sanctions.
• Sudan: Prospect of Western intervention and boycott of “genocide Olympics” causes PRC to pressure Sudan to allow UN-AU hybrid force.
• Both cases involve territorial security. Strategic calculations apparent, political reputation less vital. Norms as post-hoc justification.
13
Cooperation Mechanisms
• When the issue at stake is central to China’s perceived interests, there is probably little its interlocutors can do to affect its position. But these issues should be relatively few.
• When the issue is more peripheral, social pressure may be employed by tying China’s reputation to cooperation. This would depend on China being highly isolated.