Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research...

104
Department of Social Services Children's Division Children's Services Management Report October 2013 Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis 221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101

Transcript of Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research...

Page 1: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Department of Social Services

Children's Division

Children's Services

Management Report

October 2013

Missouri Department of Social Services

Research & Data Analysis

221 W. High Street

Jefferson City, MO 65101

Page 2: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis October 2013

I

State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:

“To maintain or improve the quality of life for Missouri citizens." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.

Page 3: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 II

Table of Contents

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only. Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values. Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N) Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2 Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4 Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6 Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8 Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10 Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12 Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................. 14 Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years .............................................................. 14 Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart .................................. 15 Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion .............. 15 Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion .............. 16 Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16 Figure 8. Percentage of Investigations/Assessments Completed Within Thirty Days ..................... 17 Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18 Family-Centered Services (FCS) Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 21 Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 23 Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ................................................ 25 Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................................... 27

Page 4: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 III

Table 11. FCS Cases Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................................. 29 Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 31 Table 13. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement ................. 33 Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 35 Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................. 35 Figure 11. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................................... 36 Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................................... 36 Figure 13. FCS Cases Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................................... 37 Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 37 Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38 Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 39 Out-of-Home Placement Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 42 Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................................ 44 Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ................ 46 Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Length of Stay and Region ......................................................................................... 47 Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 48 Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 50 Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Type ......................................................................... 52 Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Placement Category and Case Manager County ........................................................... 62 Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 64

Page 5: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 IV

Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 66 Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type............................ 68 Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 70 Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 72 Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements ..................................... 74 Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 76 Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................. 78 Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 78 Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 79 Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 79 Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 80 Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 80 Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 81 Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 82 Intensive In-Home Services (IIS) Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 88 Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 90 Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 92 Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 94 Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 96 Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ............................................................................ 98

Page 6: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis October 2013

V

Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions

Page 7: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Child Abuse and Neglect

Page 8: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During October 2013

Compared to Those Reported During October 2012

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year PercentageIncidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Northwest Andrew 15 14 7.14% 24 17 41.18%

Atchison 3 4 -25.00% 4 8 -50.00%

Buchanan 128 122 4.92% 193 190 1.58%

Caldwell 16 10 60.00% 23 19 21.05%

Carroll 7 5 40.00% 19 8 137.50%

Cass 109 68 60.29% 162 89 82.02%

Chariton 7 4 75.00% 14 7 100.00%

Clay 190 168 13.10% 246 247 -0.41%

Clinton 27 18 50.00% 39 27 44.44%

Cooper 25 10 150.00% 33 16 106.25%

Daviess 12 5 140.00% 15 10 50.00%

De Kalb 8 11 -27.27% 11 16 -31.25%

Gentry 4 7 -42.86% 7 10 -30.00%

Grundy 20 19 5.26% 32 27 18.52%

Harrison 4 6 -33.33% 4 9 -55.56%

Holt 2 5 -60.00% 3 8 -62.50%

Johnson 42 32 31.25% 58 57 1.75%

Lafayette 26 31 -16.13% 40 43 -6.98%

Linn 13 6 116.67% 29 9 222.22%

Livingston 14 13 7.69% 19 19 0.00%

Mercer 3 3 0.00% 4 4 0.00%

Nodaway 16 10 60.00% 24 15 60.00%

Pettis 65 43 51.16% 115 63 82.54%

Platte 54 50 8.00% 74 72 2.78%

Putnam 11 4 175.00% 15 10 50.00%

Ray 24 17 41.18% 30 20 50.00%

Saline 29 31 -6.45% 36 48 -25.00%

Sullivan 8 4 100.00% 13 7 85.71%

Worth 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% * Region Total * 882 720 22.50% 1,286 1,075 19.63%

Northeast Adair 29 19 52.63% 47 31 51.61%

Audrain 32 37 -13.51% 49 57 -14.04%

Boone 150 138 8.70% 225 202 11.39%

Callaway 65 54 20.37% 98 84 16.67%

Clark 6 6 0.00% 9 9 0.00%

Cole 85 67 26.87% 123 95 29.47%

Franklin 94 88 6.82% 143 141 1.42%

Gasconade 14 12 16.67% 28 17 64.71%

Howard 8 10 -20.00% 10 14 -28.57%

Jefferson 171 192 -10.94% 250 271 -7.75%

Knox 7 0 0.00% 10 0 0.00%

Lewis 8 8 0.00% 11 15 -26.67%

Lincoln 64 58 10.35% 95 85 11.77%

Macon 15 7 114.29% 22 10 120.00%

Marion 41 22 86.36% 80 34 135.29%

Monroe 11 8 37.50% 12 9 33.33%

Montgomery 13 14 -7.14% 18 22 -18.18%

Osage 19 7 171.43% 27 11 145.46%

Pike 21 12 75.00% 29 22 31.82%

Ralls 8 12 -33.33% 9 17 -47.06%

Randolph 31 33 -6.06% 45 52 -13.46%

Schuyler 7 5 40.00% 9 7 28.57%

Scotland 3 6 -50.00% 5 11 -54.55%

Shelby 4 6 -33.33% 8 12 -33.33%

St Charles 205 168 22.02% 273 229 19.21%

Warren 35 30 16.67% 65 41 58.54% * Region Total * 1,146 1,019 12.46% 1,700 1,498 13.49%

Southeast Bollinger 9 9 0.00% 13 12 8.33%

Butler 78 59 32.20% 105 91 15.39%

Cape Girardeau 53 58 -8.62% 77 91 -15.39%

Carter 13 3 333.33% 21 5 320.00%

Crawford 41 25 64.00% 59 43 37.21% Dent 13 10 30.00% 19 13 46.15%

2

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 9: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During October 2013

Compared to Those Reported During October 2012

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year PercentageIncidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Southeast Dunklin 57 32 78.13% 88 43 104.65%

Howell 49 47 4.26% 76 73 4.11%

Iron 13 3 333.33% 23 3 666.67%

Madison 19 15 26.67% 37 21 76.19%

Maries 13 13 0.00% 21 14 50.00%

Mississippi 17 20 -15.00% 29 30 -3.33%

New Madrid 25 25 0.00% 28 36 -22.22%

Oregon 11 8 37.50% 21 17 23.53%

Pemiscot 31 32 -3.13% 55 52 5.77%

Perry 18 12 50.00% 24 13 84.62%

Phelps 48 39 23.08% 68 57 19.30%

Pulaski 38 55 -30.91% 59 79 -25.32%

Reynolds 11 5 120.00% 14 9 55.56%

Ripley 14 21 -33.33% 24 29 -17.24%

Scott 49 44 11.36% 79 64 23.44%

Shannon 7 8 -12.50% 9 12 -25.00%

St Francois 80 74 8.11% 118 103 14.56%

Ste Genevieve 18 14 28.57% 21 29 -27.59%

Stoddard 27 37 -27.03% 43 53 -18.87%

Texas 30 35 -14.29% 38 43 -11.63%

Washington 34 17 100.00% 55 28 96.43%

Wayne 22 15 46.67% 40 26 53.85% * Region Total * 838 735 14.01% 1,264 1,089 16.07%

Southwest Barry 38 40 -5.00% 70 72 -2.78%

Barton 18 11 63.64% 25 15 66.67%

Bates 33 20 65.00% 49 31 58.07%

Benton 19 25 -24.00% 27 43 -37.21%

Camden 58 37 56.76% 86 51 68.63%

Cedar 16 18 -11.11% 20 36 -44.44%

Christian 84 69 21.74% 112 97 15.46%

Dade 7 7 0.00% 7 8 -12.50%

Dallas 25 24 4.17% 52 39 33.33%

Douglas 20 14 42.86% 29 19 52.63%

Greene 460 397 15.87% 684 580 17.93%

Henry 31 28 10.71% 44 41 7.32%

Hickory 15 12 25.00% 22 17 29.41%

Jasper 157 136 15.44% 237 193 22.80%

Laclede 64 55 16.36% 110 101 8.91%

Lawrence 50 27 85.19% 73 46 58.70%

Mcdonald 34 22 54.55% 50 36 38.89%

Miller 43 32 34.38% 66 50 32.00%

Moniteau 22 11 100.00% 37 14 164.29%

Morgan 36 21 71.43% 55 30 83.33%

Newton 52 43 20.93% 79 72 9.72%

Ozark 10 10 0.00% 12 13 -7.69%

Polk 43 47 -8.51% 57 69 -17.39%

St Clair 16 16 0.00% 24 26 -7.69%

Stone 27 28 -3.57% 41 36 13.89%

Taney 79 66 19.70% 104 99 5.05%

Vernon 27 26 3.85% 43 36 19.44%

Webster 44 46 -4.35% 62 57 8.77%

Wright 41 26 57.69% 75 45 66.67% * Region Total * 1,569 1,314 19.41% 2,352 1,972 19.27%

Kansas City Jackson 676 637 6.12% 1,002 867 15.57% * Region Total * 676 637 6.12% 1,002 867 15.57%

St. Louis St Louis City 364 316 15.19% 541 487 11.09%

St Louis County 637 537 18.62% 894 743 20.32% * Region Total * 1,001 853 17.35% 1,435 1,230 16.67%

Other Out Home Inv 264 185 42.70% 385 295 30.51%

Out Of State 4 6 -33.33% 4 6 -33.33%

Unknown 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00% * Region Total * 268 191 40.31% 389 301 29.24%

State Total 6,380 5,469 16.66% 9,428 8,032 17.38%

3

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 10: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During October 2013

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Pertiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Northwest Andrew 1 0 10 18 0 29 0.24 6.96

Atchison 1 1 3 5 0 10 0.85 8.46

Buchanan 7 2 85 150 8 252 0.33 12.02

Caldwell 0 0 6 27 0 33 0.00 13.73

Carroll 0 0 0 12 1 13 0.00 5.93

Cass 7 17 47 76 1 148 0.27 5.61

Chariton 0 0 1 6 0 7 0.00 3.96

Clay 7 9 85 160 2 263 0.12 4.59

Clinton 5 3 13 23 2 46 0.98 9.03

Cooper 4 1 20 8 0 33 1.01 8.29

Daviess 0 4 6 3 0 13 0.00 5.77

De Kalb 1 3 6 14 0 24 0.43 10.39

Gentry 0 1 1 11 3 16 0.00 9.67

Grundy 1 11 12 13 2 39 0.41 15.81

Harrison 4 5 3 7 0 19 1.80 8.55

Holt 1 0 1 6 0 8 1.03 8.24

Johnson 4 2 17 30 4 57 0.33 4.73

Lafayette 2 0 9 18 0 29 0.24 3.54

Linn 2 2 5 15 1 25 0.63 7.92

Livingston 0 4 14 20 0 38 0.00 11.41

Mercer 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.00 5.19

Nodaway 1 0 6 21 0 28 0.23 6.57

Pettis 2 1 51 43 0 97 0.19 8.99

Platte 4 7 16 40 0 67 0.18 3.05

Putnam 0 1 8 3 0 12 0.00 10.34

Ray 1 0 10 22 1 34 0.17 5.80

Saline 3 3 15 29 2 52 0.56 9.64

Sullivan 0 0 1 6 0 7 0.00 4.31

Worth 1 0 0 2 0 3 2.25 6.76 * Region Total * 59 77 456 788 27 1,407 0.27 6.50

Northeast Adair 1 10 8 30 1 50 0.20 10.06

Audrain 3 5 22 37 0 67 0.47 10.52

Boone 10 5 72 97 9 193 0.29 5.63

Callaway 5 10 32 37 4 88 0.50 8.80

Clark 3 0 6 7 1 17 1.75 9.90

Cole 3 14 41 50 0 108 0.17 6.02

Franklin 3 14 33 69 2 121 0.12 4.82

Gasconade 3 1 18 12 0 34 0.89 10.11

Howard 0 3 4 4 0 11 0.00 5.05

Jefferson 14 35 49 138 1 237 0.25 4.31

Knox 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.00 1.94

Lewis 3 0 2 10 0 15 1.25 6.26

Lincoln 11 6 29 52 0 98 0.75 6.65

Macon 1 0 11 6 0 18 0.26 4.76

Marion 8 7 19 30 3 67 1.16 9.73

Monroe 1 1 1 6 0 9 0.49 4.37

Montgomery 0 1 4 13 1 19 0.00 6.66

Osage 0 0 6 6 0 12 0.00 3.50

Pike 2 4 11 11 2 30 0.49 7.30

Ralls 1 1 2 11 0 15 0.42 6.31

Randolph 4 11 14 29 0 58 0.68 9.87

Schuyler 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.00 3.51

Scotland 0 0 4 3 0 7 0.00 5.14

Shelby 0 0 1 9 0 10 0.00 6.26

St Charles 32 9 77 176 7 301 0.34 3.24

Warren 1 10 13 35 2 61 0.12 7.51 * Region Total * 109 147 483 880 33 1,652 0.35 5.24

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 2 6 2 11 0.00 3.77

Butler 15 11 35 55 3 119 1.50 11.93

Cape Girardeau 4 4 20 41 1 70 0.24 4.22

Carter 1 4 1 5 1 12 0.66 7.92

Crawford 2 8 14 24 0 48 0.33 8.00 Dent 0 5 17 13 0 35 0.00 9.58

4

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 11: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During October 2013

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Pertiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Southeast Dunklin 1 11 30 41 7 90 0.12 11.13

Howell 16 8 17 44 0 85 1.59 8.45

Iron 2 2 8 2 0 14 0.83 5.83

Madison 3 0 12 9 1 25 1.02 8.53

Maries 0 0 5 12 2 19 0.00 8.82

Mississippi 0 0 8 16 0 24 0.00 7.53

New Madrid 4 3 1 19 0 27 0.89 5.98

Oregon 0 5 7 10 0 22 0.00 9.07

Pemiscot 2 6 11 29 0 48 0.40 9.54

Perry 1 1 7 10 0 19 0.21 3.99

Phelps 10 7 38 45 3 103 1.02 10.52

Pulaski 12 19 25 39 4 99 0.96 7.90

Reynolds 0 1 5 13 0 19 0.00 12.40

Ripley 0 1 9 16 0 26 0.00 7.86

Scott 7 5 40 38 0 90 0.71 9.14

Shannon 0 0 4 5 0 9 0.00 4.57

St Francois 8 7 20 63 3 101 0.56 7.01

Ste Genevieve 0 0 2 7 0 9 0.00 2.13

Stoddard 9 9 6 19 0 43 1.32 6.29

Texas 5 10 11 14 0 40 0.87 6.99

Washington 0 2 25 18 1 46 0.00 7.59

Wayne 2 3 16 13 0 34 0.71 12.12 * Region Total * 104 133 396 626 28 1,287 0.63 7.79

Southwest Barry 8 0 8 27 0 43 0.93 4.98

Barton 1 1 4 11 0 17 0.31 5.29

Bates 0 0 7 8 0 15 0.00 3.53

Benton 5 0 4 4 1 14 1.45 4.07

Camden 9 5 16 51 0 81 1.07 9.65

Cedar 0 0 6 21 0 27 0.00 8.16

Christian 3 4 46 86 1 140 0.14 6.61

Dade 0 3 3 19 0 25 0.00 14.01

Dallas 2 2 10 24 0 38 0.48 9.11

Douglas 0 1 13 7 0 21 0.00 6.86

Greene 46 28 130 289 4 497 0.79 8.51

Henry 4 3 4 31 0 42 0.81 8.47

Hickory 0 1 2 5 0 8 0.00 4.80

Jasper 10 15 88 99 2 214 0.33 7.07

Laclede 10 6 32 43 0 91 1.12 10.22

Lawrence 2 1 13 27 0 43 0.20 4.23

Mcdonald 0 1 19 36 0 56 0.00 8.65

Miller 2 7 28 25 0 62 0.33 10.09

Moniteau 6 2 4 24 0 36 1.53 9.17

Morgan 5 0 11 19 0 35 1.10 7.72

Newton 2 6 15 55 2 80 0.14 5.42

Ozark 0 0 9 13 2 24 0.00 12.31

Polk 1 3 26 48 2 80 0.13 10.44

St Clair 0 0 0 6 0 6 0.00 3.06

Stone 3 4 7 24 1 39 0.50 6.47

Taney 14 11 42 75 4 146 1.23 12.78

Vernon 2 1 11 38 0 52 0.38 9.88

Webster 5 2 13 17 0 37 0.50 3.69

Wright 5 8 22 37 2 74 1.03 15.19 * Region Total * 145 115 593 1,169 21 2,043 0.56 7.83

Kansas City Jackson 37 30 224 488 37 816 0.22 4.93 * Region Total * 37 30 224 488 37 816 0.22 4.93

St. Louis St Louis City 10 7 127 165 37 346 0.15 5.12

St Louis County 34 33 210 289 13 579 0.15 2.47 * Region Total * 44 40 337 454 50 925 0.15 3.07

Other Out Home Inv 8 1 358 0 17 384 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 8 1 358 0 17 384 0.00 0.00

State Total 506 543 2,847 4,405 213 8,514 0.35 5.97

5

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 12: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During October 2013

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 6 35.29% 10 58.82% 0 0.00% 17

Atchison 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8

Buchanan 7 4.46% 2 1.27% 54 34.40% 90 57.33% 4 2.55% 157

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 13 86.67% 0 0.00% 15

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6

Cass 6 5.94% 9 8.91% 25 24.75% 60 59.41% 1 0.99% 101

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clay 6 3.35% 6 3.35% 66 36.87% 99 55.31% 2 1.12% 179

Clinton 3 12.00% 2 8.00% 7 28.00% 12 48.00% 1 4.00% 25

Cooper 3 15.00% 1 5.00% 10 50.00% 6 30.00% 0 0.00% 20

Daviess 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 4 40.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 10

De Kalb 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 3 23.08% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 13

Gentry 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 7

Grundy 1 4.55% 5 22.73% 7 31.82% 9 40.91% 0 0.00% 22

Harrison 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 3 27.27% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 11

Holt 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Johnson 3 7.69% 2 5.13% 14 35.90% 19 48.72% 1 2.56% 39

Lafayette 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 6 27.27% 14 63.64% 0 0.00% 22

Linn 1 7.14% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 9 64.29% 1 7.14% 14

Livingston 0 0.00% 3 14.29% 8 38.10% 10 47.62% 0 0.00% 21

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Nodaway 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 4 21.05% 14 73.68% 0 0.00% 19

Pettis 2 3.18% 1 1.59% 29 46.03% 31 49.21% 0 0.00% 63

Platte 3 6.12% 2 4.08% 14 28.57% 30 61.22% 0 0.00% 49

Putnam 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8

Ray 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 6 30.00% 12 60.00% 1 5.00% 20

Saline 3 7.50% 1 2.50% 12 30.00% 22 55.00% 2 5.00% 40

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5

Worth 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

* Region Total * 49 5.41% 45 4.97% 293 32.38% 503 55.58% 15 1.66% 905

Northeast Adair 1 3.23% 6 19.36% 7 22.58% 15 48.39% 2 6.45% 31

Audrain 1 2.38% 5 11.91% 11 26.19% 25 59.52% 0 0.00% 42

Boone 8 5.71% 2 1.43% 55 39.29% 71 50.71% 4 2.86% 140

Callaway 3 5.66% 5 9.43% 20 37.74% 25 47.17% 0 0.00% 53

Clark 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 9

Cole 2 2.47% 10 12.35% 29 35.80% 38 46.91% 2 2.47% 81

Franklin 3 3.45% 9 10.35% 24 27.59% 50 57.47% 1 1.15% 87

Gasconade 3 13.04% 1 4.35% 10 43.48% 9 39.13% 0 0.00% 23

Howard 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 3 33.33% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 9

Jefferson 11 7.05% 21 13.46% 31 19.87% 92 58.97% 1 0.64% 156

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11

Lincoln 6 8.82% 4 5.88% 19 27.94% 38 55.88% 1 1.47% 68

Macon 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 6 50.00% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 12

Marion 4 11.43% 4 11.43% 8 22.86% 18 51.43% 1 2.86% 35

Monroe 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7

Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 4 30.77% 7 53.85% 1 7.69% 13

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 40.00% 6 60.00% 0 0.00% 10

Pike 2 10.53% 3 15.79% 5 26.32% 8 42.11% 1 5.26% 19

Ralls 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 6 60.00% 0 0.00% 10

Randolph 2 5.41% 6 16.22% 12 32.43% 17 45.95% 0 0.00% 37

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Charles 25 11.79% 4 1.89% 57 26.89% 122 57.55% 4 1.89% 212

Warren 1 2.78% 3 8.33% 11 30.56% 20 55.56% 1 2.78% 36

* Region Total * 80 7.18% 87 7.80% 328 29.42% 600 53.81% 20 1.79% 1,115

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Butler 7 8.75% 7 8.75% 23 28.75% 40 50.00% 3 3.75% 80

Cape Girardeau 3 6.67% 1 2.22% 15 33.33% 25 55.56% 1 2.22% 45

Carter 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 8

Crawford 2 6.90% 5 17.24% 8 27.59% 14 48.28% 0 0.00% 29

Dent 0 0.00% 5 22.73% 8 36.36% 9 40.91% 0 0.00% 22

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment

6

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 13: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During October 2013

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 1 2.08% 5 10.42% 14 29.17% 25 52.08% 3 6.25% 48

Howell 10 19.23% 3 5.77% 11 21.15% 28 53.85% 0 0.00% 52

Iron 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Madison 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 7 43.75% 8 50.00% 0 0.00% 16

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 50.00% 8 50.00% 0 0.00% 16

New Madrid 3 15.00% 2 10.00% 1 5.00% 14 70.00% 0 0.00% 20

Oregon 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 4 28.57% 8 57.14% 0 0.00% 14

Pemiscot 2 6.90% 3 10.35% 7 24.14% 17 58.62% 0 0.00% 29

Perry 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 5 35.71% 7 50.00% 0 0.00% 14

Phelps 4 7.27% 6 10.91% 15 27.27% 29 52.73% 1 1.82% 55

Pulaski 5 7.94% 10 15.87% 16 25.40% 30 47.62% 2 3.18% 63

Reynolds 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 10

Ripley 0 0.00% 1 5.00% 7 35.00% 12 60.00% 0 0.00% 20

Scott 3 6.12% 3 6.12% 20 40.82% 23 46.94% 0 0.00% 49

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Francois 6 9.38% 4 6.25% 14 21.88% 38 59.38% 2 3.13% 64

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7

Stoddard 5 26.32% 4 21.05% 4 21.05% 6 31.58% 0 0.00% 19

Texas 4 15.39% 5 19.23% 7 26.92% 10 38.46% 0 0.00% 26

Washington 0 0.00% 1 3.85% 15 57.69% 10 38.46% 0 0.00% 26

Wayne 2 8.33% 2 8.33% 12 50.00% 8 33.33% 0 0.00% 24

* Region Total * 62 7.91% 75 9.57% 237 30.23% 397 50.64% 13 1.66% 784

Southwest Barry 3 15.00% 0 0.00% 4 20.00% 13 65.00% 0 0.00% 20

Barton 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 4 33.33% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 12

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 41.67% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 12

Benton 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9

Camden 6 11.11% 3 5.56% 12 22.22% 33 61.11% 0 0.00% 54

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 27.78% 13 72.22% 0 0.00% 18

Christian 3 3.19% 4 4.26% 30 31.92% 56 59.57% 1 1.06% 94

Dade 0 0.00% 3 20.00% 1 6.67% 11 73.33% 0 0.00% 15

Dallas 1 4.00% 2 8.00% 7 28.00% 15 60.00% 0 0.00% 25

Douglas 0 0.00% 1 6.67% 7 46.67% 7 46.67% 0 0.00% 15

Greene 30 9.01% 20 6.01% 92 27.63% 188 56.46% 3 0.90% 333

Henry 3 11.11% 2 7.41% 3 11.11% 19 70.37% 0 0.00% 27

Hickory 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8

Jasper 5 3.36% 7 4.70% 60 40.27% 75 50.34% 2 1.34% 149

Laclede 7 11.86% 4 6.78% 19 32.20% 29 49.15% 0 0.00% 59

Lawrence 2 10.00% 1 5.00% 5 25.00% 12 60.00% 0 0.00% 20

Mcdonald 0 0.00% 1 3.23% 12 38.71% 18 58.07% 0 0.00% 31

Miller 2 4.35% 6 13.04% 18 39.13% 20 43.48% 0 0.00% 46

Moniteau 3 12.50% 2 8.33% 4 16.67% 15 62.50% 0 0.00% 24

Morgan 3 13.64% 0 0.00% 7 31.82% 12 54.55% 0 0.00% 22

Newton 2 4.00% 4 8.00% 12 24.00% 30 60.00% 2 4.00% 50

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 50.00% 7 43.75% 1 6.25% 16

Polk 1 1.89% 2 3.77% 21 39.62% 28 52.83% 1 1.89% 53

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6

Stone 2 7.69% 2 7.69% 5 19.23% 17 65.39% 0 0.00% 26

Taney 7 7.61% 10 10.87% 24 26.09% 49 53.26% 2 2.17% 92

Vernon 2 5.88% 1 2.94% 9 26.47% 22 64.71% 0 0.00% 34

Webster 3 10.35% 2 6.90% 9 31.03% 15 51.72% 0 0.00% 29

Wright 3 6.82% 3 6.82% 14 31.82% 23 52.27% 1 2.27% 44

* Region Total * 91 6.78% 81 6.03% 403 30.01% 755 56.22% 13 0.97% 1,343

Kansas City Jackson 27 4.74% 17 2.98% 154 27.02% 344 60.35% 28 4.91% 570

* Region Total * 27 4.74% 17 2.98% 154 27.02% 344 60.35% 28 4.91% 570

St. Louis St Louis City 8 3.52% 4 1.76% 79 34.80% 110 48.46% 26 11.45% 227

St Louis County 26 6.19% 22 5.24% 145 34.52% 218 51.91% 9 2.14% 420

* Region Total * 34 5.26% 26 4.02% 224 34.62% 328 50.70% 35 5.41% 647

Other Out Home Inv 6 2.35% 1 0.39% 236 92.55% 0 0.00% 12 4.71% 255

Unknown 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 6 2.35% 1 0.39% 236 92.55% 0 0.00% 12 4.71% 255

State Total 349 6.21% 332 5.91% 1,875 33.37% 2,927 52.09% 136 2.42% 5,619

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment

7

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 14: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2013

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15

Atchison 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Buchanan 136 89.47% 16 10.53% 0 0.00% 152

Caldwell 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Carroll 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cass 93 94.90% 5 5.10% 0 0.00% 98

Chariton 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clay 164 95.35% 8 4.65% 0 0.00% 172

Clinton 21 87.50% 3 12.50% 0 0.00% 24

Cooper 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19

Daviess 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

De Kalb 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Gentry 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Grundy 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

Harrison 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10

Holt 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Johnson 37 97.37% 1 2.63% 0 0.00% 38

Lafayette 21 95.46% 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 22

Linn 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13

Livingston 19 90.48% 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 21

Mercer 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Nodaway 15 78.95% 4 21.05% 0 0.00% 19

Pettis 61 98.39% 1 1.61% 0 0.00% 62

Platte 47 95.92% 2 4.08% 0 0.00% 49

Putnam 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Ray 15 78.95% 4 21.05% 0 0.00% 19

Saline 33 86.84% 5 13.16% 0 0.00% 38

Sullivan 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Worth 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 * Region Total * 812 93.23% 59 6.77% 0 0.00% 871

Northeast Adair 27 90.00% 3 10.00% 0 0.00% 30

Audrain 38 95.00% 2 5.00% 0 0.00% 40

Boone 122 92.42% 10 7.58% 0 0.00% 132

Callaway 49 94.23% 3 5.77% 0 0.00% 52

Clark 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Cole 72 93.51% 5 6.49% 0 0.00% 77

Franklin 73 85.88% 12 14.12% 0 0.00% 85

Gasconade 20 95.24% 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 21

Howard 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Jefferson 140 92.11% 12 7.90% 0 0.00% 152

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Lincoln 64 98.46% 1 1.54% 0 0.00% 65

Macon 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12

Marion 33 97.06% 1 2.94% 0 0.00% 34

Monroe 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Montgomery 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 11

Osage 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Pike 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16

Ralls 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Randolph 36 97.30% 1 2.70% 0 0.00% 37

Schuyler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Shelby 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Charles 182 90.10% 20 9.90% 0 0.00% 202

Warren 31 93.94% 2 6.06% 0 0.00% 33 * Region Total * 986 92.50% 80 7.51% 0 0.00% 1,066

Southeast Bollinger 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Butler 66 89.19% 8 10.81% 0 0.00% 74

Cape Girardeau 40 95.24% 2 4.76% 0 0.00% 42

Carter 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Crawford 26 89.66% 3 10.35% 0 0.00% 29 Dent 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

8

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 15: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2013

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 41 95.35% 2 4.65% 0 0.00% 43

Howell 48 94.12% 3 5.88% 0 0.00% 51

Iron 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Madison 11 73.33% 4 26.67% 0 0.00% 15

Maries 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Mississippi 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

New Madrid 19 95.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20

Oregon 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Pemiscot 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 28

Perry 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14

Phelps 49 92.45% 4 7.55% 0 0.00% 53

Pulaski 54 90.00% 6 10.00% 0 0.00% 60

Reynolds 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10

Ripley 18 94.74% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19

Scott 47 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 47

Shannon 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Francois 58 93.55% 4 6.45% 0 0.00% 62

Ste Genevieve 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Stoddard 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19

Texas 25 96.15% 1 3.85% 0 0.00% 26

Washington 21 80.77% 5 19.23% 0 0.00% 26

Wayne 21 87.50% 3 12.50% 0 0.00% 24 * Region Total * 702 92.98% 53 7.02% 0 0.00% 755

Southwest Barry 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

Barton 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Bates 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12

Benton 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Camden 47 87.04% 7 12.96% 0 0.00% 54

Cedar 17 94.44% 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 18

Christian 76 87.36% 11 12.64% 0 0.00% 87

Dade 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15

Dallas 24 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 24

Douglas 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Greene 286 88.00% 39 12.00% 0 0.00% 325

Henry 25 96.15% 1 3.85% 0 0.00% 26

Hickory 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Jasper 142 97.26% 4 2.74% 0 0.00% 146

Laclede 51 87.93% 7 12.07% 0 0.00% 58

Lawrence 13 68.42% 6 31.58% 0 0.00% 19

Mcdonald 31 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 31

Miller 42 91.30% 4 8.70% 0 0.00% 46

Moniteau 23 95.83% 1 4.17% 0 0.00% 24

Morgan 21 95.46% 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 22

Newton 45 95.75% 2 4.26% 0 0.00% 47

Ozark 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15

Polk 50 96.15% 2 3.85% 0 0.00% 52

St Clair 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Stone 23 95.83% 1 4.17% 0 0.00% 24

Taney 83 94.32% 5 5.68% 0 0.00% 88

Vernon 33 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33

Webster 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 28

Wright 39 90.70% 4 9.30% 0 0.00% 43 * Region Total * 1,200 91.95% 105 8.05% 0 0.00% 1,305

Kansas City Jackson 487 92.41% 40 7.59% 0 0.00% 527 * Region Total * 487 92.41% 40 7.59% 0 0.00% 527

St. Louis St Louis City 133 70.37% 56 29.63% 0 0.00% 189

St Louis County 345 87.12% 50 12.63% 1 0.25% 396 * Region Total * 478 81.71% 106 18.12% 1 0.17% 585

Other Out Home Inv 221 86.67% 4 1.57% 30 11.77% 255

Unknown 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 221 86.67% 4 1.57% 30 11.77% 255

State Total 4,886 91.09% 447 8.33% 31 0.58% 5,364

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

9

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 16: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2013

Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 17

Atchison 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8

Buchanan 143 91.08% 14 8.92% 157

Caldwell 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 15

Carroll 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6

Cass 95 94.06% 6 5.94% 101

Chariton 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clay 121 67.60% 58 32.40% 179

Clinton 20 80.00% 5 20.00% 25

Cooper 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20

Daviess 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 10

De Kalb 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13

Gentry 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 7

Grundy 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 22

Harrison 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 11

Holt 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

Johnson 39 100.00% 0 0.00% 39

Lafayette 16 72.73% 6 27.27% 22

Linn 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 14

Livingston 16 76.19% 5 23.81% 21

Mercer 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Nodaway 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 19

Pettis 45 71.43% 18 28.57% 63

Platte 48 97.96% 1 2.04% 49

Putnam 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8

Ray 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20

Saline 38 95.00% 2 5.00% 40

Sullivan 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Worth 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3 * Region Total * 779 86.08% 126 13.92% 905

Northeast Adair 30 96.77% 1 3.23% 31

Audrain 23 54.76% 19 45.24% 42

Boone 122 87.14% 18 12.86% 140

Callaway 37 69.81% 16 30.19% 53

Clark 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 9

Cole 81 100.00% 0 0.00% 81

Franklin 76 87.36% 11 12.64% 87

Gasconade 13 56.52% 10 43.48% 23

Howard 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 9

Jefferson 102 65.39% 54 34.62% 156

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 4 36.36% 7 63.64% 11

Lincoln 39 57.35% 29 42.65% 68

Macon 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 12

Marion 31 88.57% 4 11.43% 35

Monroe 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 7

Montgomery 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 13

Osage 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 10

Pike 16 84.21% 3 15.79% 19

Ralls 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 10

Randolph 16 43.24% 21 56.76% 37

Schuyler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Shelby 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5

St Charles 170 80.19% 42 19.81% 212

Warren 28 77.78% 8 22.22% 36 * Region Total * 860 77.13% 255 22.87% 1,115

Southeast Bollinger 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5

Butler 35 43.75% 45 56.25% 80

Cape Girardeau 20 44.44% 25 55.56% 45

Carter 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8

Crawford 23 79.31% 6 20.69% 29 Dent 16 72.73% 6 27.27% 22

0 - 30 Days Over 30 Days

10

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 17: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2013

Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 42 87.50% 6 12.50% 48

Howell 51 98.08% 1 1.92% 52

Iron 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 9

Madison 2 12.50% 14 87.50% 16

Maries 1 11.11% 8 88.89% 9

Mississippi 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 16

New Madrid 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 20

Oregon 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 14

Pemiscot 28 96.55% 1 3.45% 29

Perry 9 64.29% 5 35.71% 14

Phelps 25 45.46% 30 54.55% 55

Pulaski 51 80.95% 12 19.05% 63

Reynolds 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 10

Ripley 9 45.00% 11 55.00% 20

Scott 49 100.00% 0 0.00% 49

Shannon 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

St Francois 15 23.44% 49 76.56% 64

Ste Genevieve 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7

Stoddard 6 31.58% 13 68.42% 19

Texas 20 76.92% 6 23.08% 26

Washington 7 26.92% 19 73.08% 26

Wayne 22 91.67% 2 8.33% 24 * Region Total * 509 64.92% 275 35.08% 784

Southwest Barry 19 95.00% 1 5.00% 20

Barton 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 12

Bates 4 33.33% 8 66.67% 12

Benton 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9

Camden 50 92.59% 4 7.41% 54

Cedar 14 77.78% 4 22.22% 18

Christian 86 91.49% 8 8.51% 94

Dade 10 66.67% 5 33.33% 15

Dallas 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 25

Douglas 11 73.33% 4 26.67% 15

Greene 190 57.06% 143 42.94% 333

Henry 16 59.26% 11 40.74% 27

Hickory 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 8

Jasper 118 79.20% 31 20.81% 149

Laclede 48 81.36% 11 18.64% 59

Lawrence 18 90.00% 2 10.00% 20

Mcdonald 30 96.77% 1 3.23% 31

Miller 29 63.04% 17 36.96% 46

Moniteau 15 62.50% 9 37.50% 24

Morgan 10 45.46% 12 54.55% 22

Newton 46 92.00% 4 8.00% 50

Ozark 13 81.25% 3 18.75% 16

Polk 51 96.23% 2 3.77% 53

St Clair 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6

Stone 25 96.15% 1 3.85% 26

Taney 47 51.09% 45 48.91% 92

Vernon 30 88.24% 4 11.77% 34

Webster 29 100.00% 0 0.00% 29

Wright 31 70.46% 13 29.55% 44 * Region Total * 998 74.31% 345 25.69% 1,343

Kansas City Jackson 386 67.72% 184 32.28% 570 * Region Total * 386 67.72% 184 32.28% 570

St. Louis St Louis City 112 49.34% 115 50.66% 227

St Louis County 323 76.91% 97 23.10% 420 * Region Total * 435 67.23% 212 32.77% 647

Other Out Home Inv 252 98.82% 3 1.18% 255

Unknown 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 252 98.82% 3 1.18% 255

State Total 4,219 75.09% 1,400 24.92% 5,619

0 - 30 Days Over 30 Days

11

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 18: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During October 2013

Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service FatalityReports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Northwest Andrew 15 1 1 0 0 17

Atchison 3 0 0 0 0 3

Buchanan 128 2 6 8 0 144

Caldwell 16 0 2 0 0 18

Carroll 7 0 2 1 0 10

Cass 109 2 11 6 0 128

Chariton 7 1 0 0 0 8

Clay 190 10 12 10 0 222

Clinton 27 0 0 2 0 29

Cooper 25 0 1 6 0 32

Daviess 12 0 1 0 0 13

De Kalb 8 0 1 2 0 11

Gentry 4 0 0 0 0 4

Grundy 20 0 2 2 0 24

Harrison 4 1 0 0 0 5

Holt 2 0 0 0 0 2

Johnson 42 8 5 3 0 58

Lafayette 26 1 8 3 0 38

Linn 13 1 3 4 0 21

Livingston 14 0 2 1 0 17

Mercer 3 0 0 1 0 4

Nodaway 16 1 2 2 0 21

Pettis 65 0 7 3 0 75

Platte 54 6 3 5 0 68

Putnam 11 0 1 0 0 12

Ray 24 4 4 0 0 32

Saline 29 1 6 1 0 37

Sullivan 8 0 0 0 0 8

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 882 39 80 60 0 1,061

Northeast Adair 29 0 0 2 0 31

Audrain 32 0 6 5 0 43

Boone 150 2 8 18 0 178

Callaway 65 3 7 7 0 82

Clark 6 1 0 0 0 7

Cole 85 0 11 11 0 107

Franklin 94 2 5 8 0 109

Gasconade 14 0 1 0 0 15

Howard 8 0 0 1 0 9

Jefferson 171 8 13 16 0 208

Knox 7 0 0 0 0 7

Lewis 8 1 1 2 0 12

Lincoln 64 1 11 4 0 80

Macon 15 1 2 4 0 22

Marion 41 1 4 1 0 47

Monroe 11 0 0 0 0 11

Montgomery 13 1 1 1 0 16

Osage 19 2 2 1 0 24

Pike 21 1 1 1 0 24

Ralls 8 0 1 1 0 10

Randolph 31 2 1 4 0 38

Schuyler 7 0 0 0 0 7

Scotland 3 0 1 0 0 4

Shelby 4 0 0 1 0 5

St Charles 205 6 21 10 0 242

Warren 35 0 1 1 0 37 * Region Total * 1,146 32 98 99 0 1,375

Southeast Bollinger 9 0 1 0 0 10

Butler 78 1 7 2 0 88

Cape Girardeau 53 4 9 8 0 74

Carter 13 0 0 0 0 13

Crawford 41 1 6 3 0 51 Dent 13 0 0 1 0 14

12

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 19: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During October 2013

Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Crisis Caretaker Service FatalityReports Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Southeast Dunklin 57 2 5 0 0 64

Howell 49 3 4 8 0 64

Iron 13 0 0 2 0 15

Madison 19 0 0 1 0 20

Maries 13 0 0 2 0 15

Mississippi 17 1 1 1 0 20

New Madrid 25 1 0 5 0 31

Oregon 11 1 1 2 0 15

Pemiscot 31 0 0 5 0 36

Perry 18 0 2 2 0 22

Phelps 48 3 9 5 0 65

Pulaski 38 1 5 10 0 54

Reynolds 11 0 1 2 0 14

Ripley 14 0 1 0 0 15

Scott 49 1 3 2 0 55

Shannon 7 0 1 0 0 8

St Francois 80 5 5 6 0 96

Ste Genevieve 18 1 1 1 0 21

Stoddard 27 1 4 9 0 41

Texas 30 1 5 1 0 37

Washington 34 1 1 1 0 37

Wayne 22 0 1 2 0 25 * Region Total * 838 28 73 81 0 1,020

Southwest Barry 38 5 11 4 0 58

Barton 18 2 4 2 0 26

Bates 33 3 9 0 0 45

Benton 19 0 3 5 0 27

Camden 58 2 4 1 0 65

Cedar 16 0 2 0 0 18

Christian 84 4 10 8 0 106

Dade 7 0 0 1 0 8

Dallas 25 1 1 1 0 28

Douglas 20 0 3 6 0 29

Greene 460 27 50 43 0 580

Henry 31 2 1 3 0 37

Hickory 15 0 2 2 0 19

Jasper 157 5 19 13 0 194

Laclede 64 3 6 7 0 80

Lawrence 50 4 8 3 0 65

Mcdonald 34 0 4 1 0 39

Miller 43 0 7 7 0 57

Moniteau 22 0 2 0 0 24

Morgan 36 0 5 4 0 45

Newton 52 2 1 5 0 60

Ozark 10 0 4 0 0 14

Polk 43 1 10 10 0 64

St Clair 16 0 0 1 0 17

Stone 27 1 4 1 0 33

Taney 79 3 4 11 0 97

Vernon 27 1 1 2 0 31

Webster 44 1 2 0 0 47

Wright 41 1 4 4 0 50 * Region Total * 1,569 68 181 145 0 1,963

Kansas City Jackson 676 69 87 71 0 903 * Region Total * 676 69 87 71 0 903

St. Louis St Louis City 364 30 35 34 0 463

St Louis County 637 37 76 38 0 788 * Region Total * 1,001 67 111 72 0 1,251

Other Out Home Inv 264 0 0 0 0 264

Out Of State 4 0 0 0 0 4

Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 92 92 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 268 0 0 0 92 360

State Total 6,380 303 630 528 92 7,933

13

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 20: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

Oct

-09

Jan-1

0

Apr-

10

Jul-10

Oct

-10

Jan-1

1

Apr-

11

Jul-11

Oct

-11

Jan-1

2

Apr-

12

Jul-12

Oct

-12

Jan-1

3

Apr-

13

Jul-13

Oct

-13

Figure 2.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

For 4 Years Through October 2013

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

August

Septe

mber

Oct

ober

Figure 3.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

From October 2012 Through October 2013

2012 2013

14

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 21: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 4.

Percentage Change in CA/N Reports

Made Twelve Months ApartOctober 2012 and October 2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 5.

CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During October 2013 by Conclusion

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other

15

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 22: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Substantiated

6%

UnsubstantiatedP S I4%

Unsubstantiated31%

Family Assessment

55%

Other2%

Figure 6.CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During October 2013 by Conclusion

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 7.

Time Between Report and Child Contact

For Investigations/Assessments Completed in October 2013

Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact

16

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 23: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 8.Percentage of Investigations/Assessments

Completed Within 30 Days During October 2013

Within 30 Days More Than 30 Days

17

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 24: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 18

Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures

Table 1.

• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month. • Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any

given month).

Table 2.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. • Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents during any

given month). • Conclusions are as follows:

Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not

Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home

Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)

• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census

Bureau, www.census.gov.

Table 3.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. • Conclusions are as follows:

Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not

Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home

Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)

Table 4.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information

on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.

Page 25: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 19

Table 5.

• Based upon incidents concluded during the month. Table 6. • Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.

Figure 2. and Figure 3.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month.

Figure 4.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same

month of the previous year.

Figure 5. and Figure 6.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. • Conclusions are as follows:

Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not

Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 30 Days Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home

Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)

• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.

Figure 7.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include information

on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report or H- Located out of state.

Figure 8.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

Page 26: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Family-Centered Services

Page 27: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of October 2013

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Court Newborn Total

of Preventive Order Crisis Family CasesEvidence Services Only Assessment Assessment Active

Northwest Andrew 0 2 0 0 1 3

Atchison 0 1 1 0 2 4

Buchanan 13 13 0 4 28 58

Caldwell 3 4 0 0 4 11

Carroll 1 0 0 2 4 7

Cass 20 33 42 6 140 241

Chariton 2 3 3 0 12 20

Clay 3 28 9 9 50 99

Clinton 7 6 1 0 20 34

Cooper 1 6 0 1 14 22

Daviess 5 6 1 0 11 23

De Kalb 1 3 0 1 12 17

Gentry 0 0 1 0 8 9

Grundy 4 8 3 1 12 28

Harrison 6 6 0 1 7 20

Holt 0 0 1 0 0 1

Johnson 9 18 19 1 34 81

Lafayette 6 5 0 3 17 31

Linn 5 8 6 1 22 42

Livingston 3 6 0 0 13 22

Mercer 0 0 0 1 1 2

Nodaway 3 3 2 0 24 32

Pettis 7 8 0 0 17 32

Platte 4 8 3 0 13 28

Putnam 4 3 2 0 4 13

Ray 1 3 3 6 5 18

Saline 7 7 1 3 10 28

Sullivan 1 1 0 1 4 7

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 116 189 98 41 489 933

Northeast Adair 2 8 0 1 39 50

Audrain 6 18 0 2 25 51

Boone 26 40 39 6 117 228

Callaway 15 12 7 3 46 83

Clark 0 5 5 0 23 33

Cole 7 30 6 2 91 136

Franklin 46 39 1 11 98 195

Gasconade 5 7 0 1 12 25

Howard 1 2 0 0 9 12

Jefferson 56 34 20 3 393 506

Knox 1 1 0 0 3 5

Lewis 1 11 4 0 17 33

Lincoln 6 7 8 0 55 76

Macon 6 7 7 1 10 31

Marion 38 11 6 2 23 80

Monroe 6 3 2 2 4 17

Montgomery 4 6 0 2 14 26

Osage 0 2 0 0 5 7

Pike 8 6 1 0 22 37

Ralls 4 3 2 1 8 18

Randolph 18 20 6 4 38 86

Schuyler 2 2 2 0 10 16

Scotland 0 0 1 0 13 14

Shelby 0 6 0 1 5 12

St Charles 19 37 10 11 204 281

Warren 16 12 2 5 22 57 * Region Total * 293 329 129 58 1,306 2,115

Southeast Bollinger 4 4 0 0 20 28

Butler 5 16 7 9 80 117

Cape Girardeau 17 22 0 15 80 134

Carter 2 1 0 0 2 5

Crawford 0 12 0 0 45 57

Dent 5 14 1 4 23 47Dunklin 1 4 2 5 34 46

21

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 28: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of October 2013

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Court Newborn Total

of Preventive Order Crisis Family CasesEvidence Services Only Assessment Assessment Active

Southeast Howell 12 11 0 4 58 85

Iron 0 4 0 0 17 21

Madison 4 3 0 0 15 22

Maries 0 1 1 0 9 11

Mississippi 2 8 3 3 15 31

New Madrid 3 17 0 9 56 85

Oregon 1 1 0 0 13 15

Pemiscot 5 17 1 10 75 108

Perry 3 6 1 0 18 28

Phelps 3 15 3 0 66 87

Pulaski 2 13 3 1 62 81

Reynolds 1 3 0 1 13 18

Ripley 1 8 3 2 8 22

Scott 8 15 1 11 29 64

Shannon 0 1 0 0 5 6

St Francois 24 21 0 7 46 98

Ste Genevieve 0 0 1 1 9 11

Stoddard 7 6 1 2 121 137

Texas 2 6 0 1 25 34

Washington 10 4 1 3 13 31

Wayne 2 4 2 1 34 43 * Region Total * 124 237 31 89 991 1,472

Southwest Barry 2 9 0 1 103 115

Barton 4 4 3 4 17 32

Bates 1 2 0 4 21 28

Benton 1 4 1 0 2 8

Camden 7 8 1 1 63 80

Cedar 0 2 0 2 22 26

Christian 2 22 5 2 61 92

Dade 1 1 1 0 10 13

Dallas 1 5 0 1 25 32

Douglas 1 3 2 1 14 21

Greene 21 21 7 8 471 528

Henry 2 10 0 3 45 60

Hickory 1 3 0 0 4 8

Jasper 13 69 88 12 323 505

Laclede 28 8 2 2 72 112

Lawrence 7 16 3 3 89 118

Mcdonald 3 9 4 2 49 67

Miller 5 45 0 0 32 82

Moniteau 1 11 0 0 7 19

Morgan 10 2 4 0 20 36

Newton 4 28 15 5 134 186

Ozark 2 3 0 0 9 14

Polk 1 10 1 0 36 48

St Clair 1 4 0 3 9 17

Stone 0 16 1 1 49 67

Taney 3 19 8 7 152 189

Vernon 1 1 4 5 25 36

Webster 4 5 1 0 30 40

Wright 3 8 2 1 57 71 * Region Total * 130 348 153 68 1,951 2,650

Kansas City Jackson 223 118 86 84 1,023 1,534 * Region Total * 223 118 86 84 1,023 1,534

St. Louis St Louis City 92 69 4 26 343 534

St Louis County 226 228 68 68 432 1,022 * Region Total * 318 297 72 94 775 1,556

State Total 1,204 1,518 569 434 6,535 10,260

22

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 29: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2013

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Court Newborn Total

of Preventive Order Crisis Family CasesEvidence Services Only Assessment Assessment Active

Northwest Andrew 0 2 0 0 1 3

Atchison 0 1 1 0 2 4

Buchanan 14 18 1 4 32 69

Caldwell 3 4 0 0 4 11

Carroll 1 0 0 2 4 7

Cass 20 34 43 6 143 246

Chariton 2 3 3 0 12 20

Clay 5 29 9 9 55 107

Clinton 7 8 1 0 20 36

Cooper 1 6 0 1 14 22

Daviess 5 6 1 0 11 23

De Kalb 1 3 0 1 12 17

Gentry 0 0 1 0 8 9

Grundy 4 8 3 1 12 28

Harrison 6 6 0 1 7 20

Holt 0 1 1 0 1 3

Johnson 9 18 19 1 35 82

Lafayette 8 6 0 5 18 37

Linn 5 8 6 1 22 42

Livingston 3 6 0 0 14 23

Mercer 0 0 0 1 1 2

Nodaway 3 3 2 0 25 33

Pettis 9 8 0 0 20 37

Platte 4 10 3 0 14 31

Putnam 4 3 2 0 4 13

Ray 1 3 3 6 5 18

Saline 8 8 1 3 10 30

Sullivan 1 1 0 1 5 8

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 124 203 100 43 511 981

Northeast Adair 2 9 0 2 39 52

Audrain 6 18 0 2 25 51

Boone 27 40 39 7 121 234

Callaway 16 17 7 3 50 93

Clark 0 5 5 0 26 36

Cole 8 33 8 2 94 145

Franklin 49 39 1 11 103 203

Gasconade 5 8 0 2 15 30

Howard 1 2 0 0 12 15

Jefferson 56 35 20 3 419 533

Knox 1 1 0 0 3 5

Lewis 1 11 4 0 19 35

Lincoln 7 8 8 0 63 86

Macon 6 8 7 1 11 33

Marion 38 11 8 2 24 83

Monroe 6 3 2 2 4 17

Montgomery 4 7 0 2 14 27

Osage 0 3 0 0 5 8

Pike 8 7 1 1 24 41

Ralls 4 3 2 1 8 18

Randolph 19 21 6 5 39 90

Schuyler 2 2 2 0 13 19

Scotland 0 1 1 0 14 16

Shelby 0 6 0 1 5 12

St Charles 19 39 10 11 222 301

Warren 17 12 2 5 23 59 * Region Total * 302 349 133 63 1,395 2,242

Southeast Bollinger 5 4 0 0 21 30

Butler 7 17 7 10 81 122

Cape Girardeau 18 24 0 16 82 140

Carter 2 1 0 0 2 5

Crawford 0 13 0 0 48 61 Dent 5 14 1 4 24 48

23

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 30: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2013

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Court Newborn Total

of Preventive Order Crisis Family CasesEvidence Services Only Assessment Assessment Active

Southeast Dunklin 1 4 2 6 37 50

Howell 12 12 0 5 59 88

Iron 0 4 0 0 23 27

Madison 4 3 0 0 15 22

Maries 0 1 1 0 9 11

Mississippi 3 8 3 3 15 32

New Madrid 3 18 0 9 60 90

Oregon 1 1 0 0 14 16

Pemiscot 6 18 1 10 77 112

Perry 3 6 1 0 19 29

Phelps 3 15 3 0 69 90

Pulaski 3 14 3 1 68 89

Reynolds 1 3 0 1 15 20

Ripley 1 8 4 2 9 24

Scott 8 16 2 11 32 69

Shannon 0 3 0 0 5 8

St Francois 25 23 0 7 46 101

Ste Genevieve 0 2 1 1 10 14

Stoddard 7 6 1 3 130 147

Texas 2 6 0 1 29 38

Washington 13 8 2 4 19 46

Wayne 2 4 2 1 34 43 * Region Total * 135 256 34 95 1,052 1,572

Southwest Barry 2 9 0 1 105 117

Barton 4 5 3 4 18 34

Bates 2 2 0 4 22 30

Benton 1 4 1 0 3 9

Camden 7 9 1 1 67 85

Cedar 0 2 0 2 24 28

Christian 2 25 5 2 69 103

Dade 1 1 1 0 10 13

Dallas 1 6 0 1 26 34

Douglas 1 3 2 1 16 23

Greene 22 24 9 9 499 563

Henry 2 10 0 3 50 65

Hickory 1 3 0 0 5 9

Jasper 13 71 90 13 332 519

Laclede 28 10 2 2 76 118

Lawrence 7 17 3 4 94 125

Mcdonald 3 9 4 2 55 73

Miller 5 45 0 0 33 83

Moniteau 1 12 0 0 7 20

Morgan 10 2 4 0 24 40

Newton 4 33 17 7 146 207

Ozark 2 3 0 0 9 14

Polk 1 10 1 0 39 51

St Clair 1 4 0 3 10 18

Stone 0 16 1 1 52 70

Taney 3 19 8 9 154 193

Vernon 1 2 7 5 30 45

Webster 4 5 1 0 32 42

Wright 3 8 2 2 58 73 * Region Total * 132 369 162 76 2,065 2,804

Kansas City Jackson 230 120 88 93 1,060 1,591 * Region Total * 230 120 88 93 1,060 1,591

St. Louis St Louis City 100 80 4 29 386 599

St Louis County 242 238 69 70 455 1,074 * Region Total * 342 318 73 99 841 1,673

State Total 1,265 1,615 590 469 6,924 10,863

24

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 31: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During October 2013

Child Total Persons withAdults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Northwest Andrew 5 6 0 11 1

Atchison 6 6 0 12 3

Buchanan 168 150 0 318 52

Caldwell 20 29 0 49 25

Carroll 11 17 0 28 6

Cass 440 420 2 862 310

Chariton 41 46 0 87 30

Clay 241 217 0 458 114

Clinton 92 70 0 162 42

Cooper 35 48 0 83 31

Daviess 40 40 0 80 29

De Kalb 33 28 0 61 22

Gentry 17 16 0 33 11

Grundy 44 58 0 102 34

Harrison 39 39 0 78 21

Holt 6 9 0 15 6

Johnson 143 163 0 306 113

Lafayette 73 89 0 162 58

Linn 91 95 0 186 50

Livingston 33 30 0 63 11

Mercer 3 5 1 9 0

Nodaway 56 54 0 110 47

Pettis 68 85 0 153 49

Platte 67 63 0 130 29

Putnam 22 34 0 56 22

Ray 32 32 0 64 22

Saline 55 73 0 128 45

Sullivan 16 16 0 32 12

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 1,897 1,938 3 3,838 1,195

Northeast Adair 98 118 1 217 75

Audrain 110 121 1 232 45

Boone 470 489 3 962 293

Callaway 221 221 1 443 157

Clark 59 63 0 122 45

Cole 280 310 0 590 167

Franklin 445 443 2 890 275

Gasconade 66 73 1 140 37

Howard 34 37 0 71 19

Jefferson 1,053 901 6 1,960 691

Knox 16 11 0 27 7

Lewis 74 73 1 148 52

Lincoln 182 215 1 398 120

Macon 59 68 0 127 50

Marion 139 173 1 313 117

Monroe 34 40 0 74 17

Montgomery 45 51 1 97 25

Osage 16 14 0 30 3

Pike 94 95 0 189 53

Ralls 28 41 0 69 24

Randolph 178 192 4 374 135

Schuyler 39 35 1 75 26

Scotland 27 30 0 57 21

Shelby 26 28 0 54 16

St Charles 650 620 4 1,274 320

Warren 114 122 0 236 66 * Region Total * 4,557 4,584 28 9,169 2,856

Southeast Bollinger 57 55 0 112 37

Butler 228 260 0 488 173

Cape Girardeau 266 321 0 587 162

Carter 12 11 0 23 0

Crawford 132 135 2 269 49 Dent 99 99 3 201 24

25

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 32: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During October 2013

Child Total Persons withAdults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Southeast Dunklin 90 109 1 200 58

Howell 166 206 0 372 53

Iron 63 61 0 124 39

Madison 46 55 0 101 35

Maries 15 17 0 32 10

Mississippi 60 67 0 127 40

New Madrid 162 198 0 360 90

Oregon 31 47 0 78 21

Pemiscot 186 306 0 492 123

Perry 52 58 0 110 15

Phelps 163 187 0 350 103

Pulaski 177 170 2 349 94

Reynolds 47 42 0 89 32

Ripley 43 63 0 106 38

Scott 112 155 0 267 101

Shannon 17 17 0 34 4

St Francois 234 226 3 463 115

Ste Genevieve 26 28 0 54 15

Stoddard 271 269 2 542 165

Texas 69 73 0 142 37

Washington 74 79 0 153 64

Wayne 84 97 0 181 43 * Region Total * 2,982 3,411 13 6,406 1,740

Southwest Barry 190 250 0 440 150

Barton 59 61 0 120 31

Bates 62 60 0 122 27

Benton 15 23 0 38 13

Camden 148 158 0 306 115

Cedar 57 58 0 115 17

Christian 222 196 0 418 105

Dade 27 24 0 51 7

Dallas 78 63 0 141 31

Douglas 45 47 0 92 24

Greene 1,035 1,076 2 2,113 701

Henry 122 136 0 258 77

Hickory 12 14 0 26 7

Jasper 911 992 4 1,907 736

Laclede 236 221 3 460 175

Lawrence 235 258 0 493 156

Mcdonald 122 135 0 257 92

Miller 162 170 1 333 79

Moniteau 43 36 0 79 17

Morgan 76 89 1 166 28

Newton 347 336 1 684 252

Ozark 25 38 0 63 27

Polk 114 92 1 207 49

St Clair 38 27 0 65 13

Stone 120 158 0 278 97

Taney 345 395 1 741 272

Vernon 69 102 1 172 47

Webster 73 86 0 159 55

Wright 135 165 0 300 102 * Region Total * 5,123 5,466 15 10,604 3,502

Kansas City Jackson 2,887 3,178 19 6,084 2,599 * Region Total * 2,887 3,178 19 6,084 2,599

St. Louis St Louis City 1,074 1,493 24 2,591 718

St Louis County 1,799 2,375 29 4,203 1,127 * Region Total * 2,873 3,868 53 6,794 1,845

State Total 20,319 22,445 131 42,895 13,737

26

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 33: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During October 2013

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Court Newborn Total

of Preventive Order Crisis Family CasesEvidence Services Only Assessment Assessment Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 1 0 0 0 1

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 1 0 1

Cass 1 4 4 0 5 14

Chariton 0 0 1 0 1 2

Clay 0 2 0 0 3 5

Clinton 0 1 0 0 3 4

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 2 0 0 1 3

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 3 3

Gentry 0 0 0 0 2 2

Grundy 0 3 1 0 1 5

Harrison 1 0 0 0 1 2

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 1 1 0 3 5

Lafayette 0 1 0 0 1 2

Linn 1 0 0 0 1 2

Livingston 0 1 0 0 1 2

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 4 4

Pettis 1 2 0 0 2 5

Platte 0 2 1 0 2 5

Putnam 0 2 0 0 0 2

Ray 0 0 0 1 2 3

Saline 1 1 0 0 0 2

Sullivan 0 1 0 0 0 1

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 6 25 8 3 44 86

Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 4 5

Audrain 0 1 0 0 1 2

Boone 2 2 6 0 7 17

Callaway 2 0 0 1 5 8

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 2 0 0 16 18

Franklin 1 1 0 1 11 14

Gasconade 0 3 0 0 2 5

Howard 0 1 0 0 0 1

Jefferson 2 0 2 0 22 26

Knox 0 0 0 0 1 1

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 8 8

Macon 1 0 1 0 3 5

Marion 0 1 0 0 1 2

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 1 2 3

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 1 3 0 0 4 8

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 7 0 1 2 10

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 2 2

Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 1

Shelby 0 1 0 0 1 2

St Charles 3 8 0 1 29 41

Warren 1 2 0 2 3 8 * Region Total * 13 33 9 7 125 187

Southeast Bollinger 0 2 0 0 0 2

Butler 0 2 0 1 16 19

Cape Girardeau 2 0 0 0 4 6

Carter 0 0 0 0 1 1

Crawford 0 1 0 0 8 9 Dent 1 0 0 0 1 2

27

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 34: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During October 2013

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Court Newborn Total

of Preventive Order Crisis Family CasesEvidence Services Only Assessment Assessment Active

Southeast Dunklin 1 2 0 2 7 12

Howell 4 2 0 1 10 17

Iron 0 1 0 0 3 4

Madison 2 0 0 0 2 4

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 1 0 0 0 1 2

New Madrid 0 2 0 0 6 8

Oregon 0 0 0 0 2 2

Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 12 13

Perry 1 2 0 0 3 6

Phelps 0 2 0 0 9 11

Pulaski 0 4 0 0 10 14

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 2 2

Ripley 0 1 0 0 1 2

Scott 1 3 0 1 2 7

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 1 3 0 1 3 8

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 13 13

Texas 0 1 0 0 2 3

Washington 0 1 0 0 1 2

Wayne 1 0 0 0 1 2 * Region Total * 15 30 0 6 120 171

Southwest Barry 0 1 0 0 8 9

Barton 0 0 0 0 1 1

Bates 1 0 0 0 0 1

Benton 1 0 0 0 0 1

Camden 0 0 0 0 7 7

Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 1

Christian 0 4 0 0 10 14

Dade 0 0 0 0 1 1

Dallas 0 0 0 0 1 1

Douglas 0 0 0 0 2 2

Greene 0 1 0 1 59 61

Henry 0 1 0 1 7 9

Hickory 0 2 0 0 0 2

Jasper 0 0 1 0 23 24

Laclede 0 1 0 0 10 11

Lawrence 0 1 0 0 7 8

Mcdonald 0 2 0 0 3 5

Miller 0 4 0 0 0 4

Moniteau 0 4 0 0 0 4

Morgan 1 0 0 0 3 4

Newton 0 3 2 0 12 17

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 2 0 0 2 4

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 1 0 0 3 4

Taney 0 1 0 1 10 12

Vernon 1 1 0 0 1 3

Webster 0 1 0 0 2 3

Wright 0 2 0 0 5 7 * Region Total * 4 32 3 3 178 220

Kansas City Jackson 11 2 3 3 62 81 * Region Total * 11 2 3 3 62 81

St. Louis St Louis City 4 2 0 3 35 44

St Louis County 11 10 4 8 27 60 * Region Total * 15 12 4 11 62 104

State Total 64 134 27 33 591 849

28

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 35: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During October 2013

by Close Reason

Total

CasesNumber Percent Number Percent Closed

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 7 50.00% 7 50.00% 14

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8

Clinton 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Pettis 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Platte 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 35 68.63% 16 31.37% 51

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6

Callaway 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 12

Clark 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 3 30.00% 7 70.00% 10

Franklin 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 14

Gasconade 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5

Howard 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Jefferson 16 59.26% 11 40.74% 27

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Lincoln 6 50.00% 6 50.00% 12

Macon 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Marion 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5

Schuyler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 17 77.27% 5 22.73% 22

Warren 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 * Region Total * 97 67.36% 47 32.64% 144

Southeast Bollinger 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Butler 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6

Cape Girardeau 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Crawford 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4 Dent 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Goal Achieved Other

29

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 36: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During October 2013

by Close Reason

Total

CasesNumber Percent Number Percent Closed

Southeast Dunklin 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Howell 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Iron 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

New Madrid 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5

Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pemiscot 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Perry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Phelps 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Pulaski 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 8

Reynolds 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Ripley 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Scott 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6

Shannon 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

St Francois 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Ste Genevieve 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Stoddard 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 13

Texas 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Washington 5 33.33% 10 66.67% 15

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 70 63.64% 40 36.36% 110

Southwest Barry 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Barton 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Bates 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

Cedar 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Christian 8 66.67% 4 33.33% 12

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Douglas 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Greene 17 47.22% 19 52.78% 36

Henry 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Hickory 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Jasper 10 71.43% 4 28.57% 14

Laclede 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6

Lawrence 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7

Mcdonald 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6

Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Moniteau 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Morgan 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Newton 16 76.19% 5 23.81% 21

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

St Clair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stone 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Taney 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Vernon 5 55.56% 4 44.44% 9

Webster 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Wright 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2 * Region Total * 91 57.60% 67 42.41% 158

Kansas City Jackson 40 66.67% 20 33.33% 60 * Region Total * 40 66.67% 20 33.33% 60

St. Louis St Louis City 46 67.65% 22 32.35% 68

St Louis County 43 78.18% 12 21.82% 55 * Region Total * 89 72.36% 34 27.64% 123

State Total 422 65.33% 224 34.68% 646

Goal Achieved Other

30

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 37: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2013

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Atchison 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Buchanan 14 42.42% 7 21.21% 1 3.03% 11 33.33% 33

Caldwell 3 33.33% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 9

Carroll 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Cass 32 14.35% 29 13.00% 17 7.62% 145 65.02% 223

Chariton 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 2 13.33% 11 73.33% 15

Clay 11 16.67% 19 28.79% 7 10.61% 29 43.94% 66

Clinton 5 17.24% 10 34.48% 4 13.79% 10 34.48% 29

Cooper 9 52.94% 3 17.65% 0 0.00% 5 29.41% 17

Daviess 4 22.22% 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 10 55.56% 18

De Kalb 3 21.43% 2 14.29% 2 14.29% 7 50.00% 14

Gentry 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Grundy 6 30.00% 2 10.00% 7 35.00% 5 25.00% 20

Harrison 3 23.08% 5 38.46% 3 23.08% 2 15.39% 13

Holt 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Johnson 7 10.15% 12 17.39% 6 8.70% 44 63.77% 69

Lafayette 5 17.86% 3 10.71% 3 10.71% 17 60.71% 28

Linn 2 7.41% 2 7.41% 1 3.70% 22 81.48% 27

Livingston 6 40.00% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 8 53.33% 15

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 16 53.33% 6 20.00% 5 16.67% 3 10.00% 30

Pettis 9 29.03% 9 29.03% 4 12.90% 9 29.03% 31

Platte 3 15.79% 4 21.05% 4 21.05% 8 42.11% 19

Putnam 3 37.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 8

Ray 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 3 27.27% 6 54.55% 11

Saline 6 28.57% 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 13 61.91% 21

Sullivan 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 7

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 161 21.76% 132 17.84% 73 9.87% 374 50.54% 740

Northeast Adair 10 23.26% 7 16.28% 8 18.61% 18 41.86% 43

Audrain 6 20.69% 6 20.69% 3 10.35% 14 48.28% 29

Boone 27 16.27% 27 16.27% 23 13.86% 89 53.61% 166

Callaway 12 16.00% 17 22.67% 19 25.33% 27 36.00% 75

Clark 3 9.09% 8 24.24% 6 18.18% 16 48.49% 33

Cole 25 25.00% 16 16.00% 16 16.00% 43 43.00% 100

Franklin 22 15.17% 15 10.35% 17 11.72% 91 62.76% 145

Gasconade 3 20.00% 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 9 60.00% 15

Howard 3 30.00% 4 40.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 10

Jefferson 85 18.20% 82 17.56% 81 17.35% 219 46.90% 467

Knox 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4

Lewis 3 12.00% 6 24.00% 1 4.00% 15 60.00% 25

Lincoln 17 27.42% 13 20.97% 7 11.29% 25 40.32% 62

Macon 8 27.59% 12 41.38% 0 0.00% 9 31.03% 29

Marion 8 11.59% 14 20.29% 18 26.09% 29 42.03% 69

Monroe 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 11

Montgomery 3 15.79% 1 5.26% 1 5.26% 14 73.68% 19

Osage 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pike 8 32.00% 4 16.00% 4 16.00% 9 36.00% 25

Ralls 0 0.00% 1 8.33% 4 33.33% 7 58.33% 12

Randolph 15 20.00% 10 13.33% 6 8.00% 44 58.67% 75

Schuyler 5 29.41% 2 11.77% 4 23.53% 6 35.29% 17

Scotland 1 7.69% 5 38.46% 2 15.39% 5 38.46% 13

Shelby 4 44.44% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 9

St Charles 36 18.85% 38 19.90% 22 11.52% 95 49.74% 191

Warren 6 14.29% 6 14.29% 6 14.29% 24 57.14% 42 * Region Total * 311 18.42% 303 17.95% 251 14.87% 823 48.76% 1,688

Southeast Bollinger 9 36.00% 3 12.00% 9 36.00% 4 16.00% 25

Butler 29 32.58% 17 19.10% 16 17.98% 27 30.34% 89

Cape Girardeau 17 18.68% 17 18.68% 13 14.29% 44 48.35% 91

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Crawford 7 25.93% 8 29.63% 3 11.11% 9 33.33% 27 Dent 4 18.18% 4 18.18% 3 13.64% 11 50.00% 22

0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months

31

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 38: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2013

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 13 41.94% 6 19.36% 5 16.13% 7 22.58% 31

Howell 7 25.93% 7 25.93% 1 3.70% 12 44.44% 27

Iron 6 28.57% 6 28.57% 5 23.81% 4 19.05% 21

Madison 4 26.67% 1 6.67% 3 20.00% 7 46.67% 15

Maries 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 4 44.44% 9

Mississippi 4 17.39% 6 26.09% 10 43.48% 3 13.04% 23

New Madrid 11 23.40% 11 23.40% 6 12.77% 19 40.43% 47

Oregon 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 6 60.00% 10

Pemiscot 14 27.45% 9 17.65% 7 13.73% 21 41.18% 51

Perry 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 4 36.36% 11

Phelps 12 20.34% 19 32.20% 8 13.56% 20 33.90% 59

Pulaski 19 28.79% 13 19.70% 9 13.64% 25 37.88% 66

Reynolds 8 47.06% 3 17.65% 1 5.88% 5 29.41% 17

Ripley 4 25.00% 1 6.25% 2 12.50% 9 56.25% 16

Scott 15 28.30% 11 20.76% 9 16.98% 18 33.96% 53

Shannon 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

St Francois 8 13.12% 8 13.12% 11 18.03% 34 55.74% 61

Ste Genevieve 2 22.22% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 6 66.67% 9

Stoddard 35 31.82% 25 22.73% 14 12.73% 36 32.73% 110

Texas 4 16.00% 6 24.00% 4 16.00% 11 44.00% 25

Washington 4 10.26% 6 15.39% 13 33.33% 16 41.03% 39

Wayne 2 8.33% 7 29.17% 2 8.33% 13 54.17% 24 * Region Total * 247 25.18% 203 20.69% 156 15.90% 375 38.23% 981

Southwest Barry 28 31.82% 16 18.18% 15 17.05% 29 32.96% 88

Barton 0 0.00% 8 34.78% 5 21.74% 10 43.48% 23

Bates 4 19.05% 4 19.05% 5 23.81% 8 38.10% 21

Benton 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 2 25.00% 8

Camden 15 20.55% 14 19.18% 9 12.33% 35 47.95% 73

Cedar 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 5 45.46% 11

Christian 11 15.94% 12 17.39% 10 14.49% 36 52.17% 69

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5

Dallas 4 19.05% 2 9.52% 4 19.05% 11 52.38% 21

Douglas 4 25.00% 6 37.50% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 16

Greene 78 18.06% 89 20.60% 91 21.07% 174 40.28% 432

Henry 7 14.29% 10 20.41% 7 14.29% 25 51.02% 49

Hickory 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6

Jasper 60 13.39% 68 15.18% 61 13.62% 259 57.81% 448

Laclede 20 19.23% 15 14.42% 17 16.35% 52 50.00% 104

Lawrence 20 22.47% 16 17.98% 13 14.61% 40 44.94% 89

Mcdonald 18 27.69% 12 18.46% 5 7.69% 30 46.15% 65

Miller 5 10.64% 10 21.28% 2 4.26% 30 63.83% 47

Moniteau 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 8

Morgan 2 10.00% 7 35.00% 2 10.00% 9 45.00% 20

Newton 42 23.46% 46 25.70% 27 15.08% 64 35.75% 179

Ozark 6 46.15% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 4 30.77% 13

Polk 8 22.22% 11 30.56% 3 8.33% 14 38.89% 36

St Clair 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 6 60.00% 10

Stone 7 13.46% 13 25.00% 7 13.46% 25 48.08% 52

Taney 28 18.30% 25 16.34% 20 13.07% 80 52.29% 153

Vernon 4 13.79% 3 10.35% 5 17.24% 17 58.62% 29

Webster 11 28.95% 9 23.68% 7 18.42% 11 28.95% 38

Wright 14 24.14% 10 17.24% 6 10.35% 28 48.28% 58 * Region Total * 405 18.66% 417 19.21% 330 15.20% 1,019 46.94% 2,171

Kansas City Jackson 234 16.09% 164 11.28% 162 11.14% 894 61.49% 1,454 * Region Total * 234 16.09% 164 11.28% 162 11.14% 894 61.49% 1,454

St. Louis St Louis City 70 17.63% 48 12.09% 44 11.08% 235 59.19% 397

St Louis County 101 13.89% 107 14.72% 87 11.97% 432 59.42% 727 * Region Total * 171 15.21% 155 13.79% 131 11.66% 667 59.34% 1,124

State Total 1,529 18.74% 1,374 16.84% 1,103 13.52% 4,152 50.90% 8,158

0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months

32

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 39: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2013

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Buchanan 26 72.22% 10 27.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 36

Caldwell 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Carroll 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cass 14 60.87% 6 26.09% 1 4.35% 2 8.70% 23

Chariton 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5

Clay 19 46.34% 15 36.59% 4 9.76% 3 7.32% 41

Clinton 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Cooper 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Daviess 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

De Kalb 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Gentry 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Grundy 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Harrison 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 7

Holt 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Johnson 9 69.23% 3 23.08% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Lafayette 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Linn 9 60.00% 2 13.33% 2 13.33% 2 13.33% 15

Livingston 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 8

Mercer 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Nodaway 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Pettis 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Platte 10 83.33% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 1 8.33% 12

Putnam 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Ray 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Saline 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 155 64.32% 61 25.31% 13 5.39% 12 4.98% 241

Northeast Adair 7 77.78% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9

Audrain 14 63.64% 8 36.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22

Boone 39 57.35% 17 25.00% 6 8.82% 6 8.82% 68

Callaway 10 55.56% 6 33.33% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18

Clark 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 38 84.44% 7 15.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 45

Franklin 33 56.90% 15 25.86% 3 5.17% 7 12.07% 58

Gasconade 10 66.67% 4 26.67% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Howard 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Jefferson 38 57.58% 22 33.33% 6 9.09% 0 0.00% 66

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 4 40.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 10

Lincoln 17 70.83% 5 20.83% 1 4.17% 1 4.17% 24

Macon 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Marion 11 78.57% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 1 7.14% 14

Monroe 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 6

Montgomery 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Osage 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6

Pike 11 68.75% 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 16

Ralls 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 6

Randolph 10 66.67% 3 20.00% 1 6.67% 1 6.67% 15

Schuyler 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Scotland 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Shelby 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

St Charles 81 73.64% 24 21.82% 2 1.82% 3 2.73% 110

Warren 13 76.47% 3 17.65% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17 * Region Total * 361 65.16% 131 23.65% 35 6.32% 27 4.87% 554

Southeast Bollinger 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Butler 24 72.73% 8 24.24% 1 3.03% 0 0.00% 33

Cape Girardeau 22 44.90% 16 32.65% 7 14.29% 4 8.16% 49

Carter 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5

Crawford 17 50.00% 11 32.35% 5 14.71% 1 2.94% 34 Dent 5 19.23% 5 19.23% 2 7.69% 14 53.85% 26

0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months

33

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 40: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2013

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 14 73.68% 3 15.79% 1 5.26% 1 5.26% 19

Howell 34 55.74% 16 26.23% 5 8.20% 6 9.84% 61

Iron 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Madison 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Maries 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Mississippi 4 44.44% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 9

New Madrid 17 39.54% 7 16.28% 3 6.98% 16 37.21% 43

Oregon 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Pemiscot 24 39.34% 18 29.51% 7 11.48% 12 19.67% 61

Perry 10 55.56% 6 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 11.11% 18

Phelps 26 83.87% 5 16.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 31

Pulaski 18 78.26% 5 21.74% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 23

Reynolds 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Ripley 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Scott 7 43.75% 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 3 18.75% 16

Shannon 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Francois 20 50.00% 6 15.00% 1 2.50% 13 32.50% 40

Ste Genevieve 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Stoddard 16 43.24% 12 32.43% 5 13.51% 4 10.81% 37

Texas 9 69.23% 3 23.08% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Washington 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7

Wayne 6 31.58% 4 21.05% 4 21.05% 5 26.32% 19 * Region Total * 311 52.62% 149 25.21% 47 7.95% 84 14.21% 591

Southwest Barry 14 48.28% 8 27.59% 5 17.24% 2 6.90% 29

Barton 5 45.46% 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 11

Bates 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 8 66.67% 1 8.33% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12

Cedar 11 64.71% 6 35.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 17

Christian 15 44.12% 13 38.24% 4 11.77% 2 5.88% 34

Dade 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Dallas 9 69.23% 3 23.08% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Douglas 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Greene 84 64.12% 33 25.19% 13 9.92% 1 0.76% 131

Henry 14 87.50% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16

Hickory 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Jasper 36 50.70% 19 26.76% 10 14.09% 6 8.45% 71

Laclede 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Lawrence 13 36.11% 13 36.11% 5 13.89% 5 13.89% 36

Mcdonald 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Miller 19 52.78% 10 27.78% 3 8.33% 4 11.11% 36

Moniteau 6 50.00% 4 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 16.67% 12

Morgan 12 60.00% 8 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

Newton 24 85.71% 3 10.71% 1 3.57% 0 0.00% 28

Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 10 66.67% 4 26.67% 0 0.00% 1 6.67% 15

St Clair 2 25.00% 3 37.50% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 8

Stone 10 55.56% 8 44.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18

Taney 25 62.50% 8 20.00% 3 7.50% 4 10.00% 40

Vernon 11 68.75% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 3 18.75% 16

Webster 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Wright 8 53.33% 3 20.00% 2 13.33% 2 13.33% 15 * Region Total * 375 59.24% 166 26.22% 59 9.32% 33 5.21% 633

Kansas City Jackson 83 60.58% 26 18.98% 12 8.76% 16 11.68% 137 * Region Total * 83 60.58% 26 18.98% 12 8.76% 16 11.68% 137

St. Louis St Louis City 88 43.56% 57 28.22% 29 14.36% 28 13.86% 202

St Louis County 117 33.72% 120 34.58% 33 9.51% 77 22.19% 347 * Region Total * 205 37.34% 177 32.24% 62 11.29% 105 19.13% 549

State Total 1,490 55.08% 710 26.25% 228 8.43% 277 10.24% 2,705

0 - 4 Months 4 - 8 Months 8 - 12 Months 12 + Months

34

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 41: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

8,000

8,500

9,000

9,500

10,000

10,500

11,000

11,500O

ct-0

9

Dec-

09

Jan-1

0

Mar-

10

May-1

0

Jul-10

Oct

-10

Dec-

10

Jan-1

1

Mar-

11

May-1

1

Jul-11

Oct

-11

Dec-

11

Jan-1

2

Mar-

12

May-1

2

Jul-12

Oct

-12

Dec-

12

Jan-1

3

Mar-

13

May-1

3

Jul-13

Oct

-13

Figure 9.FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month

Over the Previous Four Years

-10.00%

0.00%

10.00%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 10.

Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active

as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months ApartOctober 31, 2012 and October 31, 2013

35

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 42: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 11.

FCS Cases Opened During October 2013

by Reason for Opening

Other Court Ordered Preventive Services Preponderance of Evidence

Court Ordered3%

Preponderance of Evidence

8%

Other

73%

Preventive Services

16%

Figure 12.

FCS Cases Opened During October 2013

by Reason for Opening

36

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 43: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 13.FCS Cases Closed During October 2013

by Reason for Closing

Other Reason Goal Achieved

0 to 4 Months

19%

4 to 8 Months17%

8 to 12 Months

13%

12+ Months51%

Figure 14.

FCS Cases Active During October 2013

With Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open

37

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 44: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0 to 4 Months55%

4 to 8 Months26%

8 to 12 Months9%

12+ Months10%

Figure 15.

FCS Cases Active During October 2013 With No Court Involvement by the

Number of Months Open

38

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 45: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 39

Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures

Table 9.

Counts of persons are unduplicated.

Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.

Table 11.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced;

case goals have been achieved;

services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources;

no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;

client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource; other;

family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;

family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Table 12.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Figure 11. and Figure 12.

Other includes Newborn Crisis Assessment and Family Assessment.

Page 46: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 40

Figure 13.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist; all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced;

case goals have been achieved; services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and

family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention; client moved-unable to locate;

client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource; other;

family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan; family moved out of state;

family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Figure 14.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Page 47: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Out-of-Home Placement

Page 48: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During October 2013

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Group Home/ Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per AverageHome Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 2 0 0 1 3 0.14 0.67

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cass 0 0 6 9 1 16 0.61 11.06

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clay 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.03 7.00

Clinton 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.20 3.00

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Daviess 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.44 15.00

De Kalb 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.87 1.50

Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.60 15.00

Grundy 0 0 5 0 0 5 2.03 7.40

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 3 3 0 0 6 0.50 7.17

Lafayette 0 4 0 0 0 4 0.49 5.75

Linn 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.32 12.00

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Nodaway 0 4 1 0 1 6 1.41 5.83

Pettis 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.28 13.67

Platte 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.05 0.00

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ray 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.51 2.00

Saline 0 3 2 0 0 5 0.93 7.80

Sullivan 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.62 0.00

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 0 24 23 11 3 61 0.28 7.62

Northeast Adair 0 1 1 0 1 3 0.60 8.00

Audrain 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.16 13.00

Boone 0 3 1 1 2 7 0.20 10.00

Callaway 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.20 7.00

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cole 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.11 10.50

Franklin 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.08 1.50

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howard 0 4 0 0 0 4 1.84 13.00

Jefferson 0 16 10 1 1 28 0.51 8.25

Knox 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.97 9.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.27 2.00

Macon 0 2 4 0 0 6 1.59 1.67

Marion 0 4 2 0 0 6 0.87 3.00

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Osage 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.58 7.50

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ralls 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.42 5.00

Randolph 0 2 2 1 0 5 0.85 4.00

Schuyler 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.88 12.00

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Charles 0 4 1 3 2 10 0.11 5.80

Warren 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.37 1.00 * Region Total * 0 42 33 7 6 88 0.28 6.66

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Butler 0 6 19 1 0 26 2.61 9.88

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 Carter 0 1 0 0 1 2 1.32 13.50

42

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 49: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During October 2013

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Group Home/ Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per AverageHome Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.50 13.33

Dent 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.27 5.00

Dunklin 0 3 6 0 0 9 1.11 7.78

Howell 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 0.00

Iron 0 0 1 1 1 3 1.25 13.00

Madison 0 3 0 0 0 3 1.02 4.00

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

New Madrid 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.89 9.75

Oregon 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.41 0.00

Pemiscot 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.20 5.00

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Phelps 0 0 3 1 0 4 0.41 9.00

Pulaski 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.16 5.50

Reynolds 0 4 1 0 0 5 3.26 4.00

Ripley 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.91 13.00

Scott 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.20 6.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.14 2.00

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stoddard 0 10 1 1 0 12 1.76 5.42

Texas 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 10.00

Washington 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.49 2.67

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 0 34 46 5 3 88 0.53 7.94

Southwest Barry 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.12 0.00

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Bates 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.94 7.75

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Camden 0 5 2 0 0 7 0.83 3.43

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Christian 0 4 0 1 0 5 0.24 5.80

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.33 16.00

Greene 0 11 9 10 0 30 0.51 6.10

Henry 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.81 7.00

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jasper 0 12 12 2 1 27 0.89 7.04

Laclede 0 3 3 0 0 6 0.67 6.17

Lawrence 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.20 9.00

Mcdonald 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.15 16.00

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.66 7.67

Newton 0 4 5 0 1 10 0.68 7.60

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stone 0 3 0 0 1 4 0.66 8.00

Taney 0 4 1 0 0 5 0.44 3.60

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Webster 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.20 2.00

Wright 0 6 7 2 0 15 3.08 6.87 * Region Total * 0 56 51 15 5 127 0.49 6.52

Kansas City Jackson 0 22 36 7 3 68 0.41 6.60 * Region Total * 0 22 36 7 3 68 0.41 6.60

St. Louis St Louis City 0 5 2 5 2 14 0.21 7.36

St Louis County 0 25 8 4 3 40 0.17 5.45 * Region Total * 0 30 10 9 5 54 0.18 5.94

State Total 0 208 199 54 25 486 0.34 6.89

43

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 50: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During October 2013

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Group Home/ Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cass 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.08 7.00

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pettis 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.09 14.00

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Putnam 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.86 5.00

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Sullivan 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.62 6.00

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 3 0 2 0 5 0.02 7.80

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.20 13.00

Audrain 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.16 17.00

Boone 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.03 12.00

Callaway 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 15.00

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Franklin 0 2 3 0 0 5 0.20 10.00

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jefferson 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.02 9.00

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.07 3.00

Macon 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.26 16.00

Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Randolph 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.34 7.00

Schuyler 0 0 2 0 0 2 1.75 11.50

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Charles 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.03 8.00

Warren 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.25 15.00

* Region Total * 0 7 12 0 2 21 0.07 10.76

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Butler 0 3 2 1 0 6 0.60 9.33

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carter 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.66 20.00

44

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 51: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During October 2013

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Group Home/ Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.17 12.00

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dunklin 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.25 12.50

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Iron 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.83 11.00

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Phelps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scott 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 15.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 5 3 4 1 13 0.08 11.54

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.12 17.00

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Christian 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.09 14.50

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Greene 0 0 2 1 2 5 0.09 11.60

Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jasper 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.03 14.00

Laclede 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.34 9.33

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.15 14.00

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Newton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Polk 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.26 7.50

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Taney 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Wright 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.41 11.00

* Region Total * 0 1 6 6 4 17 0.07 11.59

Kansas City Jackson 0 7 5 0 0 12 0.07 6.83

* Region Total * 0 7 5 0 0 12 0.07 6.83

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.03 7.00

St Louis County 0 0 0 3 1 4 0.02 13.75

* Region Total * 0 0 2 3 1 6 0.02 11.50

State Total 0 23 28 15 8 74 0.05 10.31

45

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 52: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

From October 2011 Through September 2013

Month/ Total

Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries

Oct-2011 355 90 445

Nov-2011 405 80 485

Dec-2011 416 80 496

Jan-2012 377 107 484

Feb-2012 416 77 493

Mar-2012 445 132 577

Apr-2012 543 108 651

May-2012 441 89 530

Jun-2012 437 81 518

Jul-2012 409 99 508

Aug-2012 472 80 552

Sep-2012 485 92 577

Oct-2012 436 107 543

Nov-2012 447 94 541

Dec-2012 383 67 450

Jan-2013 416 75 491

Feb-2013 463 81 544

Mar-2013 433 93 526

Apr-2013 514 95 609

May-2013 522 79 601

Jun-2013 422 66 488

Jul-2013 489 71 560

Aug-2013 523 102 625

Sep-2013 505 87 592

Total 10,754 2,132 12,886

46

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 53: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 17.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2013

by Length of Stay and Region

Average

Length of AverageNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest 7 36.84% 4 21.05% 8 42.11% 19 23.00 8.21

Northeast 30 34.09% 30 34.09% 28 31.82% 88 21.18 9.98

Southeast 18 30.51% 30 50.85% 11 18.64% 59 19.00 9.14

Southwest 28 28.00% 31 31.00% 41 41.00% 100 20.85 8.66

Kansas City 27 57.45% 11 23.40% 9 19.15% 47 13.96 7.26

St. Louis 16 37.21% 14 32.56% 13 30.23% 43 28.72 10.74

State Total 126 35.39% 120 33.71% 110 30.90% 356 20.78 9.11

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

47

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 54: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of AverageNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3 63.00 18.67

Atchison 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5 13.80 9.00

Buchanan 21 52.50% 10 25.00% 9 22.50% 40 16.35 7.30

Caldwell 6 40.00% 5 33.33% 4 26.67% 15 19.00 5.40

Carroll 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 8.50 1.00

Cass 91 34.08% 71 26.59% 105 39.33% 267 20.58 10.46

Chariton 11 37.93% 7 24.14% 11 37.93% 29 21.03 9.62

Clay 59 51.30% 35 30.44% 21 18.26% 115 18.77 7.69

Clinton 19 38.78% 16 32.65% 14 28.57% 49 22.67 9.00

Cooper 11 45.83% 8 33.33% 5 20.83% 24 23.13 12.58

Daviess 6 16.67% 16 44.44% 14 38.89% 36 27.25 11.11

De Kalb 6 27.27% 16 72.73% 0 0.00% 22 13.68 5.18

Gentry 6 75.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8 23.75 9.88

Grundy 30 66.67% 8 17.78% 7 15.56% 45 15.89 8.84

Harrison 19 61.29% 9 29.03% 3 9.68% 31 15.26 9.45

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 31 32.63% 29 30.53% 35 36.84% 95 22.04 9.55

Lafayette 19 35.19% 16 29.63% 19 35.19% 54 22.20 7.70

Linn 18 38.30% 18 38.30% 11 23.40% 47 17.19 8.28

Livingston 1 7.14% 4 28.57% 9 64.29% 14 39.36 11.14

Mercer 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 5 33.20 7.00

Nodaway 37 71.15% 3 5.77% 12 23.08% 52 13.88 5.71

Pettis 25 46.30% 13 24.07% 16 29.63% 54 26.98 9.63

Platte 13 40.63% 10 31.25% 9 28.13% 32 25.25 9.16

Putnam 8 30.77% 16 61.54% 2 7.69% 26 16.69 7.42

Ray 6 31.58% 6 31.58% 7 36.84% 19 19.84 6.05

Saline 13 32.50% 14 35.00% 13 32.50% 40 22.55 7.63

Sullivan 6 40.00% 8 53.33% 1 6.67% 15 14.40 6.47

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 467 40.82% 341 29.81% 336 29.37% 1,144 20.57 8.90

Northeast Adair 31 50.82% 20 32.79% 10 16.39% 61 13.79 7.80

Audrain 22 45.83% 9 18.75% 17 35.42% 48 28.17 11.31

Boone 101 44.30% 78 34.21% 49 21.49% 228 19.96 9.55

Callaway 67 56.78% 27 22.88% 24 20.34% 118 18.40 7.47

Clark 18 39.13% 18 39.13% 10 21.74% 46 16.50 8.04

Cole 75 52.82% 32 22.54% 35 24.65% 142 25.05 10.27

Franklin 103 35.52% 98 33.79% 89 30.69% 290 22.84 8.19

Gasconade 10 43.48% 6 26.09% 7 30.44% 23 14.83 7.52

Howard 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15 4.73 8.67

Jefferson 282 49.13% 191 33.28% 101 17.60% 574 15.90 8.42

Knox 7 70.00% 1 10.00% 2 20.00% 10 12.40 8.80

Lewis 13 34.21% 11 28.95% 14 36.84% 38 23.92 11.71

Lincoln 36 40.91% 24 27.27% 28 31.82% 88 21.07 8.81

Macon 19 46.34% 4 9.76% 18 43.90% 41 20.15 10.17

Marion 66 54.55% 36 29.75% 19 15.70% 121 16.88 8.11

Monroe 6 50.00% 4 33.33% 2 16.67% 12 15.00 6.83

Montgomery 5 18.52% 8 29.63% 14 51.85% 27 35.48 12.67

Osage 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 7 26.71 7.57

Pike 21 36.84% 16 28.07% 20 35.09% 57 21.60 8.56

Ralls 5 17.86% 8 28.57% 15 53.57% 28 24.50 10.96

Randolph 45 42.06% 37 34.58% 25 23.36% 107 20.74 9.36

Schuyler 10 43.48% 9 39.13% 4 17.39% 23 13.65 10.48

Scotland 10 52.63% 8 42.11% 1 5.26% 19 14.26 9.37

Shelby 10 55.56% 3 16.67% 5 27.78% 18 13.61 7.28

St Charles 118 38.19% 100 32.36% 91 29.45% 309 21.01 8.82

Warren 25 40.98% 16 26.23% 20 32.79% 61 32.43 11.49 * Region Total * 1,124 44.76% 765 30.47% 622 24.77% 2,511 19.88 8.91

Southeast Bollinger 27 90.00% 3 10.00% 0 0.00% 30 9.07 7.17

Butler 100 56.82% 45 25.57% 31 17.61% 176 12.49 8.55

Cape Girardeau 58 41.14% 44 31.21% 39 27.66% 141 18.45 7.70 Carter 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 7 50.00 17.14

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

48

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 55: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of AverageNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Southeast Crawford 29 55.77% 12 23.08% 11 21.15% 52 13.31 8.79

Dent 6 25.00% 10 41.67% 8 33.33% 24 30.75 13.29

Dunklin 42 53.17% 17 21.52% 20 25.32% 79 19.16 7.72

Howell 21 46.67% 5 11.11% 19 42.22% 45 29.58 11.56

Iron 36 81.82% 5 11.36% 3 6.82% 44 9.30 8.61

Madison 19 44.19% 6 13.95% 18 41.86% 43 21.58 8.56

Maries 6 46.15% 4 30.77% 3 23.08% 13 14.54 9.46

Mississippi 24 80.00% 6 20.00% 0 0.00% 30 8.00 8.67

New Madrid 48 69.57% 12 17.39% 9 13.04% 69 14.29 7.12

Oregon 6 31.58% 5 26.32% 8 42.11% 19 30.84 8.63

Pemiscot 49 54.44% 26 28.89% 15 16.67% 90 13.94 6.84

Perry 7 43.75% 4 25.00% 5 31.25% 16 20.13 9.44

Phelps 47 45.19% 19 18.27% 38 36.54% 104 24.44 8.95

Pulaski 33 50.00% 10 15.15% 23 34.85% 66 17.86 9.70

Reynolds 17 48.57% 10 28.57% 8 22.86% 35 18.26 10.23

Ripley 12 26.09% 18 39.13% 16 34.78% 46 24.67 10.09

Scott 44 61.97% 17 23.94% 10 14.09% 71 15.34 5.87

Shannon 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5 33.40 8.80

St Francois 51 38.93% 48 36.64% 32 24.43% 131 21.60 7.95

Ste Genevieve 2 11.77% 8 47.06% 7 41.18% 17 32.47 13.47

Stoddard 75 50.68% 42 28.38% 31 20.95% 148 15.41 7.76

Texas 21 51.22% 15 36.59% 5 12.20% 41 17.07 9.76

Washington 39 37.86% 20 19.42% 44 42.72% 103 26.36 8.43

Wayne 18 42.86% 11 26.19% 13 30.95% 42 23.00 10.10 * Region Total * 844 50.03% 422 25.02% 421 24.96% 1,687 18.62 8.51

Southwest Barry 69 59.48% 27 23.28% 20 17.24% 116 15.22 8.59

Barton 9 47.37% 4 21.05% 6 31.58% 19 17.89 9.42

Bates 12 44.44% 8 29.63% 7 25.93% 27 21.52 10.70

Benton 6 66.67% 1 11.11% 2 22.22% 9 18.00 13.78

Camden 46 45.55% 25 24.75% 30 29.70% 101 22.10 10.05

Cedar 5 38.46% 5 38.46% 3 23.08% 13 15.77 8.85

Christian 32 40.00% 17 21.25% 31 38.75% 80 24.06 10.26

Dade 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 6 42.83 8.83

Dallas 8 26.67% 14 46.67% 8 26.67% 30 28.03 9.57

Douglas 18 51.43% 8 22.86% 9 25.71% 35 17.60 10.43

Greene 364 42.57% 200 23.39% 291 34.04% 855 22.27 8.78

Henry 21 26.92% 18 23.08% 39 50.00% 78 24.73 10.19

Hickory 4 36.36% 2 18.18% 5 45.46% 11 25.64 12.73

Jasper 240 40.61% 205 34.69% 146 24.70% 591 19.30 9.13

Laclede 60 39.47% 35 23.03% 57 37.50% 152 22.01 9.23

Lawrence 76 48.72% 46 29.49% 34 21.80% 156 18.77 9.94

Mcdonald 39 55.71% 15 21.43% 16 22.86% 70 19.29 11.40

Miller 29 43.28% 12 17.91% 26 38.81% 67 22.18 8.69

Moniteau 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 7 53.85% 13 29.92 10.62

Morgan 13 41.94% 4 12.90% 14 45.16% 31 24.52 10.03

Newton 132 62.56% 44 20.85% 35 16.59% 211 15.10 9.06

Ozark 17 77.27% 2 9.09% 3 13.64% 22 10.68 7.41

Polk 14 35.00% 13 32.50% 13 32.50% 40 23.85 11.93

St Clair 5 33.33% 7 46.67% 3 20.00% 15 16.13 10.67

Stone 50 53.19% 22 23.40% 22 23.40% 94 17.23 8.89

Taney 114 44.88% 58 22.84% 82 32.28% 254 21.60 8.22

Vernon 7 21.21% 6 18.18% 20 60.61% 33 34.85 9.03

Webster 23 39.66% 14 24.14% 21 36.21% 58 21.05 10.62

Wright 47 51.65% 24 26.37% 20 21.98% 91 15.47 8.62 * Region Total * 1,466 44.72% 837 25.53% 975 29.74% 3,278 20.54 9.21

Kansas City Jackson 818 42.54% 579 30.11% 526 27.35% 1,923 18.84 8.77 * Region Total * 818 42.54% 579 30.11% 526 27.35% 1,923 18.84 8.77

St. Louis St Louis City 189 31.50% 131 21.83% 280 46.67% 600 40.49 9.94

St Louis County 302 36.65% 198 24.03% 324 39.32% 824 25.49 9.41 * Region Total * 491 34.48% 329 23.10% 604 42.42% 1,424 32 9.63

Other Icama 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8 12.00 7.13 * Region Total * 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8 12.00 7.13

State Total 5,214 43.54% 3,277 27.37% 3,484 29.09% 11,975 21.20 9.00

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

49

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 56: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Group Home/ Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per AverageHome Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 1 0 2 3 0.72 18.67

Atchison 0 2 1 0 2 5 4.23 9.00

Buchanan 0 26 8 3 3 40 1.91 7.30

Caldwell 0 5 7 1 2 15 6.24 5.40

Carroll 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.91 1.00

Cass 4 59 119 67 18 267 10.12 10.46

Chariton 0 7 9 8 5 29 16.39 9.62

Clay 0 48 42 15 10 115 2.01 7.69

Clinton 0 27 13 9 0 49 9.62 9.00

Cooper 0 6 6 11 1 24 6.03 12.58

Daviess 0 6 24 5 1 36 15.99 11.11

De Kalb 0 6 16 0 0 22 9.52 5.18

Gentry 0 0 6 1 1 8 4.84 9.88

Grundy 0 17 23 3 2 45 18.24 8.84

Harrison 0 16 14 1 0 31 13.96 9.45

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 29 42 19 5 95 7.89 9.55

Lafayette 0 21 24 6 3 54 6.60 7.70

Linn 0 15 25 6 1 47 14.89 8.28

Livingston 0 2 5 4 3 14 4.21 11.14

Mercer 0 5 0 0 0 5 5.19 7.00

Nodaway 0 16 31 2 3 52 12.20 5.71

Pettis 0 23 17 9 5 54 5.01 9.63

Platte 0 12 11 5 4 32 1.45 9.16

Putnam 0 11 10 4 1 26 22.41 7.42

Ray 0 11 8 0 0 19 3.24 6.05

Saline 0 8 26 5 1 40 7.41 7.63

Sullivan 0 7 5 1 2 15 9.23 6.47

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 * Region Total * 4 386 493 185 76 1,144 5.28 8.90

Northeast Adair 0 11 35 12 3 61 12.27 7.80

Audrain 0 15 22 8 3 48 7.54 11.31

Boone 0 68 98 45 17 228 6.66 9.55

Callaway 0 37 63 15 3 118 11.80 7.47

Clark 0 14 20 8 4 46 26.79 8.04

Cole 0 44 41 32 25 142 7.92 10.27

Franklin 0 144 113 12 21 290 11.55 8.19

Gasconade 0 12 9 2 0 23 6.84 7.52

Howard 0 6 8 1 0 15 6.89 8.67

Jefferson 0 175 347 36 16 574 10.44 8.42

Knox 0 2 6 2 0 10 9.69 8.80

Lewis 0 12 21 2 3 38 15.87 11.71

Lincoln 0 42 33 8 5 88 5.98 8.81

Macon 0 11 19 9 2 41 10.85 10.17

Marion 0 66 46 7 2 121 17.57 8.11

Monroe 0 7 3 2 0 12 5.82 6.83

Montgomery 0 5 10 4 8 27 9.46 12.67

Osage 0 1 5 0 1 7 2.04 7.57

Pike 0 28 19 8 2 57 13.88 8.56

Ralls 0 16 10 1 1 28 11.77 10.96

Randolph 0 32 51 17 7 107 18.20 9.36

Schuyler 0 8 10 3 2 23 20.18 10.48

Scotland 0 6 10 3 0 19 13.95 9.37

Shelby 0 4 7 7 0 18 11.27 7.28

St Charles 0 104 160 27 18 309 3.33 8.82

Warren 0 20 26 7 8 61 7.51 11.49 * Region Total * 0 890 1,192 278 151 2,511 7.96 8.91

Southeast Bollinger 0 6 21 3 0 30 10.28 7.17

Butler 0 55 82 25 14 176 17.65 8.55

Cape Girardeau 0 66 53 17 5 141 8.49 7.70 Carter 0 2 0 1 4 7 4.62 17.14

50

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 57: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Group Home/ Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per AverageHome Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 17 15 15 5 52 8.67 8.79

Dent 0 6 5 9 4 24 6.57 13.29

Dunklin 0 30 35 9 5 79 9.77 7.72

Howell 0 24 7 9 5 45 4.47 11.56

Iron 0 12 16 15 1 44 18.31 8.61

Madison 0 20 10 11 2 43 14.67 8.56

Maries 0 0 12 1 0 13 6.04 9.46

Mississippi 0 10 19 1 0 30 9.41 8.67

New Madrid 1 22 41 5 0 69 15.29 7.12

Oregon 0 10 0 3 6 19 7.83 8.63

Pemiscot 0 39 39 12 0 90 17.88 6.84

Perry 0 3 6 6 1 16 3.36 9.44

Phelps 0 26 56 14 8 104 10.62 8.95

Pulaski 0 25 22 12 7 66 5.26 9.70

Reynolds 0 16 13 4 2 35 22.85 10.23

Ripley 0 11 21 8 6 46 13.91 10.09

Scott 0 18 46 7 0 71 7.21 5.87

Shannon 0 3 0 2 0 5 2.54 8.80

St Francois 0 61 41 23 6 131 9.09 7.95

Ste Genevieve 0 6 3 6 2 17 4.03 13.47

Stoddard 0 41 89 12 6 148 21.67 7.76

Texas 0 12 18 9 2 41 7.17 9.76

Washington 1 41 38 21 2 103 16.99 8.43

Wayne 0 15 13 12 2 42 14.97 10.10 * Region Total * 2 597 721 272 95 1,687 10.21 8.51

Southwest Barry 0 37 52 20 7 116 13.43 8.59

Barton 0 8 8 2 1 19 5.91 9.42

Bates 0 6 14 2 5 27 6.35 10.70

Benton 0 3 1 4 1 9 2.62 13.78

Camden 0 47 30 14 10 101 12.04 10.05

Cedar 0 8 2 2 1 13 3.93 8.85

Christian 1 33 27 12 7 80 3.78 10.26

Dade 0 2 3 1 0 6 3.36 8.83

Dallas 0 9 12 6 3 30 7.20 9.57

Douglas 0 9 15 9 2 35 11.43 10.43

Greene 3 348 270 176 58 855 14.65 8.78

Henry 0 36 25 10 7 78 15.74 10.19

Hickory 0 8 1 1 1 11 6.61 12.73

Jasper 0 215 253 87 36 591 19.52 9.13

Laclede 0 70 63 11 8 152 17.07 9.23

Lawrence 0 52 70 24 10 156 15.33 9.94

Mcdonald 0 32 17 13 8 70 10.81 11.40

Miller 0 27 26 9 5 67 10.90 8.69

Moniteau 0 4 5 3 1 13 3.31 10.62

Morgan 0 8 13 7 3 31 6.84 10.03

Newton 0 95 89 19 8 211 14.29 9.06

Ozark 0 14 7 1 0 22 11.29 7.41

Polk 0 14 10 13 3 40 5.22 11.93

St Clair 0 5 7 2 1 15 7.65 10.67

Stone 0 26 47 17 4 94 15.58 8.89

Taney 0 107 96 41 10 254 22.23 8.22

Vernon 0 19 7 5 2 33 6.27 9.03

Webster 0 18 20 13 7 58 5.78 10.62

Wright 0 34 35 17 5 91 18.68 8.62 * Region Total * 4 1,294 1,225 541 214 3,278 12.57 9.21

Kansas City Jackson 4 738 741 262 178 1,923 11.61 8.77 * Region Total * 4 738 741 262 178 1,923 11.61 8.77

St. Louis St Louis City 0 260 183 88 69 600 8.88 9.94

St Louis County 0 336 319 97 72 824 3.52 9.41 * Region Total * 0 596 502 185 141 1,424 4.72 9.63

Other Icama 0 3 3 2 0 8 0.00 7.13 * Region Total * 0 3 3 2 0 8 0.00 7.13

State Total 14 4,504 4,877 1,725 855 11,975 8.40 9.00

51

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 58: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 4 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 5

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Clinton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Nodaway 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 4 0 0 21 7 1 0 0 17

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 0 0 0 12 2 0 0 0 0

Callaway 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0

Franklin 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 0 0 18 1 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0

Warren 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 81 18 1 0 0 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 1

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

52

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 59: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Texas 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 1 5 10 1 1 0 12

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 0 0 2 17 6 2 1 0 0

Henry 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 0 0 10 4 3 0 0 0

Laclede 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0

Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 7

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Taney 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0

Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 2 66 16 5 2 0 14

Kansas City Jackson 4 0 0 82 4 5 0 3 14 * Region Total * 4 0 0 82 4 5 0 3 14

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 37 2 1 0 0 0

St Louis County 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 85 2 1 0 0 0

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

State Total 8 0 3 340 57 14 3 3 60

53

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 60: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0

Buchanan 0 3 1 2 18 1 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 5 1 1 42 4 0 0

Chariton 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0

Clay 0 3 2 2 39 2 0 0

Clinton 0 0 7 1 18 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0

De Kalb 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 2 0 0 26 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 3 0 17 1 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 2 8 0 2 0 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 1 0 11 2 0 0

Putnam 0 0 1 0 10 1 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0

Saline 0 1 3 0 4 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 18 28 9 293 18 0 0

Northeast Adair 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 0

Audrain 0 0 3 1 8 0 0 0

Boone 0 2 5 2 47 2 0 0

Callaway 0 1 3 2 25 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0

Cole 0 1 0 1 36 7 0 1

Franklin 0 7 2 6 127 4 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0

Howard 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 17 14 8 118 5 0 1

Knox 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 2 2 0 5 1 0 0

Lincoln 0 2 1 1 36 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0

Marion 0 1 0 0 62 1 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 1

Osage 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Pike 0 1 1 6 20 0 0 0

Ralls 0 3 0 2 10 0 0 0

Randolph 0 4 0 0 26 3 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0

St Charles 0 10 1 1 77 0 0 0

Warren 0 0 3 0 15 2 0 0 * Region Total * 0 57 38 32 682 28 0 3

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0

Butler 0 1 0 3 48 1 0 0

Cape Girardeau 0 2 1 4 49 0 0 0 Carter 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0

54

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 61: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0

Howell 0 0 2 2 20 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 1 1 10 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 1 0 0 20 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 38 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Phelps 0 0 0 3 23 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 1 3 1 20 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0

Scott 0 2 3 0 13 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

St Francois 0 0 2 3 56 0 0 1

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 1 1 39 0 0 0

Texas 0 0 0 3 9 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 2 13 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 8 14 23 535 3 0 1

Southwest Barry 0 2 0 1 32 1 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 1 0 5 2 0 0

Benton 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0

Camden 0 1 0 0 37 4 0 0

Cedar 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0

Christian 0 5 1 1 23 1 0 1

Dade 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Dallas 0 2 0 0 6 2 0 0

Douglas 0 1 3 0 3 0 0 0

Greene 0 26 0 9 296 9 0 0

Henry 0 6 2 0 25 2 0 0

Hickory 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 0

Jasper 0 11 0 10 184 2 0 0

Laclede 0 6 0 4 56 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 2 3 1 45 1 0 0

Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 23 2 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0

Newton 0 1 0 0 83 2 0 0

Ozark 0 0 1 1 12 0 0 0

Polk 0 2 0 1 11 0 0 0

St Clair 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0

Stone 0 2 3 1 18 0 0 0

Taney 0 10 0 4 86 1 0 1

Vernon 0 1 0 1 16 0 0 0

Webster 0 2 0 1 15 2 0 0

Wright 0 0 1 1 29 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 85 15 36 1,078 34 0 2

Kansas City Jackson 0 66 39 33 501 28 0 2 * Region Total * 0 66 39 33 501 28 0 2

St. Louis St Louis City 0 46 2 18 157 15 0 1

St Louis County 0 52 13 10 213 15 0 1 * Region Total * 0 98 15 28 370 30 0 2

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 0 332 149 161 3,459 141 0 10

55

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 62: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2

Northwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 3 0 0 1 1 3 0 0

Caldwell 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 13 5 0 0 7 57 0 0

Chariton 0 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0

Clay 0 7 0 0 0 5 14 0 0

Clinton 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 0 0

Cooper 0 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0

Daviess 0 4 3 0 0 0 5 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Grundy 0 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0

Harrison 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 4 0 0 0 3 16 0 0

Lafayette 0 4 0 0 0 1 6 0 0

Linn 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0

Livingston 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 8 0 2 1 2 0 0

Pettis 0 2 0 0 0 5 7 0 0

Platte 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 1

Putnam 0 4 0 3 0 0 4 0 0

Ray 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 0

Sullivan 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 56 31 3 4 33 156 0 1

Northeast Adair 0 15 1 0 1 1 6 0 0

Audrain 0 8 3 0 0 3 5 0 0

Boone 0 12 13 0 2 8 26 0 0

Callaway 0 6 2 0 0 2 11 0 0

Clark 0 11 2 0 0 3 2 0 0

Cole 0 8 1 0 1 9 25 0 0

Franklin 1 26 1 0 1 11 4 0 1

Gasconade 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0

Jefferson 2 36 22 1 1 7 26 2 1

Knox 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Lewis 0 6 6 0 0 2 1 0 0

Lincoln 0 5 6 0 0 4 2 0 0

Macon 0 4 2 0 0 1 6 0 0

Marion 0 2 8 0 0 1 4 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Montgomery 0 2 0 0 0 6 2 0 0

Osage 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0

Pike 0 2 2 0 0 1 4 0 0

Ralls 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 0

Randolph 1 7 3 0 0 4 7 0 0

Schuyler 0 2 3 0 0 2 2 0 0

Scotland 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Shelby 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

St Charles 1 20 7 0 5 8 20 0 0

Warren 0 6 1 0 0 4 5 0 0 * Region Total * 5 185 94 1 11 79 164 2 3

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Butler 0 6 17 0 1 5 21 0 0

Cape Girardeau 0 2 1 0 0 4 14 0 0 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

56

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 63: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RFA RFP RF2

Southeast Crawford 0 1 3 0 1 4 9 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0

Dunklin 0 3 4 0 0 5 6 0 0

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0

Iron 0 6 0 0 0 1 15 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0

Maries 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 8 0 0 0 11 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0

Phelps 2 8 4 0 0 4 11 0 1

Pulaski 0 1 3 0 1 5 11 0 0

Reynolds 0 4 3 0 0 1 4 0 0

Ripley 0 4 1 0 0 4 8 0 0

Scott 0 2 7 0 0 0 5 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

St Francois 0 7 2 0 0 2 19 0 1

Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 0

Stoddard 0 18 7 0 1 4 10 0 0

Texas 0 3 0 0 0 1 7 0 0

Washington 1 5 4 0 0 1 19 0 0

Wayne 0 3 0 0 0 1 10 0 1 * Region Total * 3 79 70 0 4 60 221 0 3

Southwest Barry 0 3 0 0 0 6 14 0 0

Barton 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0

Benton 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0

Camden 0 5 6 0 0 4 12 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0

Christian 0 2 0 0 0 4 11 0 1

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Dallas 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0

Douglas 0 5 0 0 1 0 6 0 0

Greene 3 64 20 0 2 26 138 1 2

Henry 0 5 1 0 0 4 9 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Jasper 4 58 17 0 1 18 77 0 0

Laclede 0 11 7 1 1 5 10 0 0

Lawrence 0 15 4 0 0 4 20 0 0

Mcdonald 0 3 2 0 0 6 11 0 0

Miller 0 9 2 0 0 3 5 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Morgan 0 5 3 0 0 2 6 0 0

Newton 0 10 11 0 1 3 18 0 0

Ozark 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Polk 0 3 0 0 0 2 12 0 0

St Clair 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0

Stone 1 17 4 0 0 4 16 0 0

Taney 0 21 1 0 0 3 34 0 0

Vernon 0 0 1 0 0 2 4 0 0

Webster 0 7 2 0 1 1 8 0 0

Wright 0 6 0 0 0 4 14 0 0 * Region Total * 8 252 85 1 7 107 446 1 3

Kansas City Jackson 1 74 63 0 3 71 224 0 0 * Region Total * 1 74 63 0 3 71 224 0 0

St. Louis St Louis City 1 14 5 2 3 17 70 0 2

St Louis County 1 21 17 1 8 21 71 2 2 * Region Total * 2 35 22 3 11 38 141 2 4

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

State Total 19 681 365 8 40 388 1,354 5 14

57

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 64: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF3 RF4 RFE RFM RFI RFT RHB RHM

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Clinton 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 2 13 0 0 0 0 0 3

Northeast Adair 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 0

Audrain 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 9 7 0 0 0 1 0 0

Callaway 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 1

Franklin 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1

Macon 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Marion 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Monroe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Montgomery 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Scotland 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Warren 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * Region Total * 45 48 1 0 0 5 1 4

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cape Girardeau 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carter 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

58

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 65: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF3 RF4 RFE RFM RFI RFT RHB RHM

Southeast Crawford 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dent 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howell 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Perry 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Phelps 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3

Pulaski 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Texas 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 8 31 0 0 0 0 2 6

Southwest Barry 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Benton 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 3 14 11 0 0 1 1 0

Henry 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 3

Laclede 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1

Mcdonald 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Taney 1 3 1 0 2 0 0 1

Vernon 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1

Wright 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 6 42 17 0 2 3 1 9

Kansas City Jackson 0 29 0 0 0 0 4 2 * Region Total * 0 29 0 0 0 0 4 2

St. Louis St Louis City 3 7 1 0 0 0 4 0

St Louis County 2 12 4 0 0 0 2 3 * Region Total * 5 19 5 0 0 0 6 3

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 66 182 23 0 2 8 14 27

59

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 66: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Atchison 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5

Buchanan 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 40

Caldwell 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Cass 57 42 5 0 0 7 0 267

Chariton 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 29

Clay 7 27 2 0 0 1 1 115

Clinton 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 49

Cooper 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 24

Daviess 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 36

De Kalb 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 22

Gentry 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 8

Grundy 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 45

Harrison 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 31

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 26 12 1 0 0 2 1 95

Lafayette 15 5 1 0 0 0 0 54

Linn 9 15 0 0 0 1 0 47

Livingston 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Nodaway 7 15 0 0 0 0 0 52

Pettis 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 54

Platte 7 2 0 0 1 0 0 32

Putnam 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 26

Ray 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 19

Saline 18 6 0 0 0 1 0 40

Sullivan 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 237 163 9 0 1 13 3 1,144

Northeast Adair 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 61

Audrain 4 7 0 0 0 1 0 48

Boone 45 28 3 0 0 2 0 228

Callaway 31 24 0 0 0 0 1 118

Clark 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 46

Cole 13 17 0 0 0 0 2 142

Franklin 69 16 0 0 0 1 0 290

Gasconade 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 23

Howard 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 15

Jefferson 177 108 2 0 0 0 0 574

Knox 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 10

Lewis 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 38

Lincoln 16 5 0 0 0 1 0 88

Macon 4 9 0 0 0 1 0 41

Marion 25 11 0 0 0 0 0 121

Monroe 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

Montgomery 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 27

Osage 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7

Pike 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 57

Ralls 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 28

Randolph 23 17 0 0 0 0 0 107

Schuyler 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 23

Scotland 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 19

Shelby 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 18

St Charles 86 46 3 0 0 1 2 309

Warren 7 11 1 0 0 1 0 61 * Region Total * 571 328 9 0 0 10 5 2,511

Southeast Bollinger 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 30

Butler 23 36 1 0 1 2 1 176

Cape Girardeau 38 12 0 0 0 1 0 141 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

60

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 67: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Southeast Crawford 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 52

Dent 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 24

Dunklin 20 8 0 0 0 0 0 79

Howell 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 45

Iron 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 44

Madison 4 6 0 0 0 1 0 43

Maries 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 13

Mississippi 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 30

New Madrid 24 12 0 0 0 0 0 69

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19

Pemiscot 24 6 0 0 0 0 0 90

Perry 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 16

Phelps 30 9 1 0 0 0 2 104

Pulaski 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 66

Reynolds 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 35

Ripley 7 9 0 0 0 0 1 46

Scott 18 19 0 0 0 0 0 71

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

St Francois 25 6 1 0 0 0 3 131

Ste Genevieve 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17

Stoddard 32 31 0 0 1 1 0 148

Texas 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 41

Washington 18 8 0 0 0 1 1 103

Wayne 7 3 0 0 0 1 1 42 * Region Total * 355 205 4 0 2 9 11 1,687

Southwest Barry 39 10 0 0 0 0 0 116

Barton 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 19

Bates 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 27

Benton 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9

Camden 15 3 0 0 0 1 2 101

Cedar 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13

Christian 17 6 0 0 1 0 0 80

Dade 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

Dallas 8 3 0 0 0 1 0 30

Douglas 9 1 0 0 0 2 1 35

Greene 146 36 7 0 2 6 4 855

Henry 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 78

Hickory 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

Jasper 139 32 1 0 0 4 7 591

Laclede 31 13 1 0 0 0 1 152

Lawrence 38 12 0 0 0 0 2 156

Mcdonald 7 5 0 0 1 1 1 70

Miller 11 4 0 0 0 2 0 67

Moniteau 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 13

Morgan 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 31

Newton 30 38 0 0 1 0 0 211

Ozark 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 22

Polk 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 40

St Clair 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

Stone 15 10 0 0 0 1 0 94

Taney 60 12 3 0 1 0 2 254

Vernon 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 33

Webster 9 1 1 0 1 1 1 58

Wright 19 10 0 0 0 1 1 91 * Region Total * 649 218 14 0 7 21 24 3,278

Kansas City Jackson 244 351 42 1 2 9 22 1,923 * Region Total * 244 351 42 1 2 9 22 1,923

St. Louis St Louis City 111 45 11 0 2 5 18 600

St Louis County 186 87 10 0 1 4 17 824 * Region Total * 297 132 21 0 3 9 35 1,424

Other Icama 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 * Region Total * 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

State Total 2,356 1,397 99 1 15 71 100 11,975

61

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 68: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Group Home/

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential TotalHome Home Home Care Other Exits

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 1 0 0 1 2

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 1 1 1 0 3

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 0 1 1

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 1 0 0 1

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 2 0 0 2

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 0 0 0 1

Pettis 0 1 4 0 0 5

Platte 0 0 0 0 1 1

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 2 1 0 3

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 4 10 2 3 19

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 0 1 11 1 0 13

Callaway 0 0 3 0 0 3

Clark 0 0 0 0 1 1

Cole 0 2 7 4 1 14

Franklin 0 3 1 0 0 4

Gasconade 0 0 8 0 0 8

Howard 0 0 0 1 0 1

Jefferson 0 1 16 0 2 19

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 1 1 0 0 2

Lincoln 0 1 0 0 0 1

Macon 0 0 3 1 0 4

Marion 0 3 0 1 0 4

Monroe 0 0 0 0 1 1

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 1 0 1 2

Schuyler 0 0 2 0 0 2

Scotland 0 0 2 0 0 2

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 0 3 2 0 1 6

Warren 0 0 1 0 0 1 * Region Total * 0 15 58 8 7 88

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 2 0 2

Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 0 0 1 Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0

62

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 69: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2013

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Group Home/

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential TotalHome Home Home Care Other Exits

Southeast Crawford 0 0 1 0 1 2

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 1 0 0 1

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 1 0 0 0 1

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 3 1 0 4

Oregon 0 0 1 0 0 1

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 1 0 1 0 2

Pulaski 0 4 1 2 0 7

Reynolds 0 1 0 0 0 1

Ripley 0 0 0 1 0 1

Scott 0 0 4 0 0 4

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 6 0 0 1 7

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 5 13 4 1 23

Texas 0 1 0 0 0 1

Washington 0 0 1 0 0 1

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 0 20 25 11 3 59

Southwest Barry 0 4 0 1 0 5

Barton 0 4 0 0 0 4

Bates 0 1 3 0 0 4

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 3 0 1 4

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 1 1 0 2

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 2 0 1 3

Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 1

Greene 1 4 8 3 4 20

Henry 0 0 1 0 0 1

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 1 3 12 1 0 17

Laclede 0 1 1 0 0 2

Lawrence 0 0 1 2 0 3

Mcdonald 0 0 4 0 0 4

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 1 0 0 1

Newton 0 10 5 0 0 15

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 1 0 0 1

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0

Taney 0 3 2 1 0 6

Vernon 0 4 0 0 0 4

Webster 0 1 0 0 2 3

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 2 35 45 9 9 100

Kansas City Jackson 0 13 31 2 1 47 * Region Total * 0 13 31 2 1 47

St. Louis St Louis City 0 7 2 3 3 15

St Louis County 1 10 11 2 4 28 * Region Total * 1 17 13 5 7 43

State Total 3 104 182 37 30 356

63

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 70: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During October 2013

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved TotalHome Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 1 0 0 0 4 5

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 1 1

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 2 0 0 0 0 2

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 1 0 0 0 0 1

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 1 0 0 0 0 1

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 2 0 0 0 0 2

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 2 0 0 0 0 2

Platte 0 0 0 1 0 1

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 1 1 2

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 9 0 0 2 6 17

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 1 1

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 1 0 1 0 2 4

Callaway 3 0 0 0 0 3

Clark 0 0 0 0 1 1

Cole 6 0 0 1 2 9

Franklin 1 0 1 1 0 3

Gasconade 4 0 0 0 0 4

Howard 1 0 0 0 0 1

Jefferson 8 0 0 1 3 12

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 2 0 0 0 0 2

Lincoln 1 0 0 0 0 1

Macon 3 1 0 0 0 4

Marion 1 1 0 1 1 4

Monroe 0 0 0 1 0 1

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 0 1 0 1

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 2 0 0 0 0 2

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 2 0 0 1 1 4

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 35 2 2 7 11 57

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 2 0 0 0 0 2

Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 0 0 1

Carter 0 0 0 0 1 1 Crawford 1 0 0 1 0 2

64

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 71: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During October 2013

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved TotalHome Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Southeast Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 1 1

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 1 1

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 4 0 0 1 1 6

Oregon 0 0 0 0 3 3

Pemiscot 1 0 0 0 0 1

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 2 0 0 0 0 2

Pulaski 6 0 1 0 0 7

Reynolds 1 0 0 0 0 1

Ripley 1 0 0 0 0 1

Scott 4 0 0 0 0 4

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 1 0 0 0 1 2

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 17 0 0 1 2 20

Texas 1 0 0 0 0 1

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 42 0 1 3 10 56

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 1 1

Barton 4 0 0 0 0 4

Bates 2 0 0 1 0 3

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 2 0 0 2 0 4

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 1 0 0 0 1 2

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 2 0 0 1 0 3

Douglas 0 0 0 1 0 1

Greene 12 1 2 0 7 22

Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 8 0 0 0 0 8

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 3 0 0 0 0 3

Mcdonald 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 1 0 0 0 0 1

Newton 14 0 0 0 0 14

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 1 0 0 0 0 1

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0

Taney 5 0 0 1 0 6

Vernon 4 0 0 0 0 4

Webster 1 0 0 2 0 3

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 60 1 2 8 9 80

Kansas City Jackson 21 0 0 2 3 26 * Region Total * 21 0 0 2 3 26

St. Louis St Louis City 9 1 0 2 15 27

St Louis County 13 0 0 2 8 23 * Region Total * 22 1 0 4 23 50

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 1 1 * Region Total * 0 0 0 0 1 1

State Total 189 4 5 26 63 287

65

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 72: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2013

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions

In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized TotalTPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 6 6 0 0 12

Caldwell 2 0 0 0 2

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 31 2 1 0 34

Chariton 3 3 0 0 6

Clay 4 8 0 0 12

Clinton 3 3 0 0 6

Cooper 0 2 0 0 2

Daviess 0 2 0 0 2

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 3 1 0 0 4

Harrison 2 0 0 0 2

Holt 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 8 3 0 0 11

Lafayette 14 0 0 0 14

Linn 6 3 0 0 9

Livingston 3 0 0 0 3

Mercer 0 4 0 0 4

Nodaway 2 4 0 1 7

Pettis 7 2 0 0 9

Platte 1 1 0 0 2

Putnam 7 0 0 0 7

Ray 4 0 0 0 4

Saline 0 0 0 2 2

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 106 44 1 3 154

Northeast Adair 13 1 0 0 14

Audrain 2 2 0 0 4

Boone 15 7 1 2 25

Callaway 2 10 0 0 12

Clark 1 1 0 0 2

Cole 7 1 0 0 8

Franklin 27 8 0 1 36

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 52 17 0 0 69

Knox 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 4 7 0 0 11

Macon 6 1 0 0 7

Marion 12 6 0 0 18

Monroe 4 0 0 0 4

Montgomery 2 2 0 0 4

Osage 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 4 9 0 0 13

Ralls 2 0 0 0 2

Randolph 8 1 0 1 10

Schuyler 3 0 0 0 3

Scotland 0 1 0 0 1

Shelby 1 4 0 0 5

St Charles 26 20 0 0 46

Warren 3 2 0 0 5 * Region Total * 194 100 1 4 299

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 32 4 0 0 36

Cape Girardeau 17 7 0 0 24

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 Crawford 0 3 0 0 3

66

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 73: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2013

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions

In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized TotalTPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children

Southeast Dent 0 5 0 0 5

Dunklin 11 6 0 0 17

Howell 2 1 0 0 3

Iron 3 2 0 0 5

Madison 2 1 0 0 3

Maries 4 0 0 0 4

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 5 1 0 0 6

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 2 1 0 0 3

Perry 1 2 0 0 3

Phelps 20 5 0 0 25

Pulaski 6 3 0 1 10

Reynolds 1 4 0 0 5

Ripley 6 1 0 0 7

Scott 4 6 0 0 10

Shannon 1 0 0 0 1

St Francois 4 5 0 5 14

Ste Genevieve 2 1 0 0 3

Stoddard 25 8 0 2 35

Texas 1 2 0 0 3

Washington 4 16 0 1 21

Wayne 4 1 0 0 5 * Region Total * 157 85 0 9 251

Southwest Barry 9 0 0 4 13

Barton 1 0 0 0 1

Bates 7 1 1 0 9

Benton 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 2 0 0 0 2

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 8 6 0 0 14

Dade 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 1 3 0 0 4

Douglas 2 2 0 0 4

Greene 104 121 0 3 228

Henry 23 0 0 0 23

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 89 18 5 14 126

Laclede 18 2 0 1 21

Lawrence 22 5 0 0 27

Mcdonald 12 5 0 3 20

Miller 0 2 0 0 2

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 40 8 0 0 48

Ozark 5 0 0 0 5

Polk 3 0 0 0 3

St Clair 2 0 0 0 2

Stone 4 1 0 0 5

Taney 51 7 0 0 58

Vernon 4 6 0 0 10

Webster 9 1 0 0 10

Wright 9 1 0 0 10 * Region Total * 425 189 6 25 645

Kansas City Jackson 366 56 2 11 435 * Region Total * 366 56 2 11 435

St. Louis St Louis City 86 26 0 4 116

St Louis County 123 36 2 5 166 * Region Total * 209 62 2 9 282

Other Icama 0 0 33 0 33 * Region Total * 0 0 33 0 33

State Total 1,457 536 45 61 2,099

67

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 74: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Foster Homes on the Last Day of October 2013

by Vendor Type and County

Current LicensedCareer Foster Foster Newly Number of VendorsFoster Adoptive Group Foster Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months PercentageHome Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Buchanan 6 0 0 19 0 13 19 18 5.56 Caldwell 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 100.00 Carroll 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0.00 Cass 1 0 2 19 0 14 19 23 -17.39 Chariton 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 3 -33.33 Clay 3 0 0 49 3 30 49 32 53.13 Clinton 0 0 0 12 1 8 12 10 20.00 Cooper 0 0 0 5 0 3 5 7 -28.57 Daviess 1 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0.00 De Kalb 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 100.00 Gentry 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 3 0.00 Grundy 1 0 0 5 0 4 5 5 0.00 Harrison 0 0 0 5 0 4 5 3 66.67 Holt 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 2 0.00 Johnson 1 0 0 23 0 18 23 18 27.78 Lafayette 1 0 0 8 0 8 8 11 -27.27 Linn 1 0 0 6 0 4 6 4 50.00 Livingston 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 2 0.00 Mercer 0 0 1 2 0 3 3 1 200.00 Nodaway 1 0 0 6 0 3 6 7 -14.29 Pettis 3 0 1 17 2 11 18 25 -28.00 Platte 1 0 0 24 1 16 24 19 26.32 Putnam 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 3 0.00 Ray 0 0 0 7 0 5 7 9 -22.22 Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 -100.00 Sullivan 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 100.00 Worth 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 -50.00 * Region Total * 21 0 4 232 7 163 234 218 7.34

Northeast Adair 1 0 0 15 0 10 16 16 0.00 Audrain 1 0 0 5 0 4 5 9 -44.44 Boone 16 0 0 52 0 36 54 61 -11.48 Callaway 0 0 0 7 0 6 7 5 40.00 Clark 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0.00 Cole 4 0 0 41 0 26 41 33 24.24 Franklin 3 0 2 60 0 48 60 59 1.69 Gasconade 0 0 0 6 0 5 6 7 -14.29 Howard 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 4 -50.00 Jefferson 5 0 0 52 1 39 52 38 36.84 Knox 1 0 0 5 0 3 5 4 25.00 Lewis 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0.00 Lincoln 0 0 0 21 0 12 21 25 -16.00 Macon 0 0 0 7 0 5 7 4 75.00 Marion 3 0 1 26 0 20 26 21 23.81 Monroe 0 0 0 5 0 2 5 3 66.67 Montgomery 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0.00 Osage 2 0 0 6 0 5 6 7 -14.29 Pike 0 0 0 9 0 8 9 9 0.00 Ralls 0 0 0 9 0 6 9 6 50.00 Randolph 4 0 0 11 0 7 11 10 10.00 Schuyler 0 0 0 6 0 4 6 7 -14.29 Scotland 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 5 -20.00 Shelby 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0.00 St Charles 6 0 0 37 0 29 37 40 -7.50 Warren 0 0 0 10 1 4 10 12 -16.67 * Region Total * 46 0 3 405 2 294 408 394 3.55

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 6 0 5 6 6 0.00 Butler 1 0 1 13 0 10 14 17 -17.65 Cape Girardeau 0 0 1 21 2 18 22 24 -8.33 Carter 1 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0.00

68

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 75: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Foster Homes on the Last Day of October 2013

by Vendor Type and County

Current LicensedCareer Foster Foster Newly Number of VendorsFoster Adoptive Group Foster Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months PercentageHome Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Southeast Crawford 1 0 0 7 0 4 7 7 0.00 Dent 2 0 0 10 0 7 10 6 66.67 Dunklin 0 0 0 12 0 10 12 10 20.00 Howell 0 0 0 19 0 16 19 21 -9.52 Iron 0 0 0 5 0 4 5 6 -16.67 Madison 0 0 0 7 0 5 7 7 0.00 Maries 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 2 0.00 Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 New Madrid 1 0 0 8 0 6 8 7 14.29 Oregon 0 0 0 8 0 6 8 7 14.29 Pemiscot 1 0 0 13 0 12 13 16 -18.75 Perry 0 0 0 6 0 4 6 6 0.00 Phelps 3 0 0 31 1 21 31 33 -6.06 Pulaski 3 0 0 15 0 5 16 23 -30.43 Reynolds 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 3 0.00 Ripley 0 0 0 12 0 10 12 12 0.00 Scott 0 0 0 14 0 10 14 18 -22.22 Shannon 0 0 0 5 0 4 5 5 0.00 St Francois 1 0 0 28 0 22 28 27 3.70 Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 2 0 3 3 3 0.00 Stoddard 0 0 0 23 0 18 23 14 64.29 Texas 0 0 0 19 0 14 19 22 -13.64 Washington 0 0 0 16 0 13 16 16 0.00 Wayne 1 0 0 6 0 6 7 8 -12.50 * Region Total * 15 1 2 315 3 240 320 330 -3.03

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 12 0 10 12 15 -20.00 Barton 0 0 0 13 0 9 13 10 30.00 Bates 2 0 0 10 0 7 10 11 -9.09 Benton 1 0 0 13 0 13 13 14 -7.14 Camden 1 0 1 17 0 10 17 16 6.25 Cedar 0 0 0 9 0 6 9 5 80.00 Christian 2 0 0 53 0 40 53 59 -10.17 Dade 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 5 -40.00 Dallas 1 0 0 12 0 5 12 10 20.00 Douglas 1 0 0 11 0 10 11 11 0.00 Greene 6 0 0 105 1 77 105 100 5.00 Henry 1 0 0 24 0 17 24 18 33.33 Hickory 0 0 0 8 0 4 8 6 33.33 Jasper 6 0 0 97 0 76 97 96 1.04 Laclede 4 0 0 24 0 18 24 30 -20.00 Lawrence 0 0 0 19 1 16 19 11 72.73 Mcdonald 1 0 0 12 0 10 12 11 9.09 Miller 1 0 0 10 0 8 10 12 -16.67 Moniteau 1 0 0 10 0 5 10 12 -16.67 Morgan 0 0 0 10 0 5 10 10 0.00 Newton 2 0 1 28 0 23 29 29 0.00 Ozark 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 0 0.00 Polk 3 0 0 16 0 10 16 18 -11.11 St Clair 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 4 -25.00 Stone 2 0 1 14 1 9 14 17 -17.65 Taney 1 0 0 25 1 20 25 21 19.05 Vernon 1 0 0 7 0 5 7 9 -22.22 Webster 0 0 0 23 0 14 23 20 15.00 Wright 1 0 0 5 0 4 5 7 -28.57 * Region Total * 38 0 3 596 4 437 597 587 1.70

Kansas City Jackson 26 0 3 241 1 168 243 237 2.53 * Region Total * 26 0 3 241 1 168 243 237 2.53

St. Louis St Louis City 18 0 0 87 1 66 87 87 0.00 St Louis County 30 3 0 121 1 86 123 130 -5.38 * Region Total * 48 3 0 208 2 152 210 217 -3.23

State Total 194 4 15 1,997 19 1,454 2,012 1,983 1.46

69

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 76: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

TotalLS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Northwest Andrew 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Atchison 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 10

Buchanan 40 0 0 3 114 0 0 1 31 0 189

Caldwell 15 0 0 0 68 0 0 0 19 0 102

Carroll 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Cass 267 1 0 9 250 0 3 1 41 0 572

Chariton 29 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 33

Clay 115 0 0 4 463 0 0 0 56 0 638

Clinton 49 0 0 3 22 0 0 0 3 0 77

Cooper 24 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 6 0 39

Daviess 36 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 43

De Kalb 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 24

Gentry 8 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 15

Grundy 45 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 18 0 105

Harrison 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31

Holt 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8

Johnson 95 0 0 0 119 0 1 0 21 0 236

Lafayette 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54

Linn 47 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 18 0 116

Livingston 14 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 17

Mercer 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Nodaway 52 0 0 0 43 0 0 1 8 0 104

Pettis 54 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 21 0 197

Platte 32 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 16 0 53

Putnam 26 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27

Ray 19 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 22 0 97

Saline 40 0 0 0 138 0 0 0 23 0 201

Sullivan 15 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 20

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 1,144 1 0 28 1,521 0 4 4 316 0 3,018

Northeast Adair 61 0 0 3 52 0 1 0 25 0 142

Audrain 48 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 12 0 97

Boone 228 1 0 1 315 0 1 2 135 0 683

Callaway 118 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 123

Clark 46 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 57

Cole 142 0 0 8 173 0 2 4 72 0 401

Franklin 290 0 0 1 222 0 0 0 105 0 618

Gasconade 23 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 14 0 49

Howard 15 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 12 0 50

Jefferson 574 0 0 9 495 0 4 2 322 1 1,407

Knox 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

Lewis 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 42

Lincoln 88 0 0 0 119 0 0 0 50 1 258

Macon 41 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 28 0 110

Marion 121 0 0 3 80 0 0 1 33 0 238

Monroe 12 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 5 0 25

Montgomery 27 0 0 1 22 0 1 0 15 0 66

Osage 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 5 0 19

Pike 57 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 5 0 73

Ralls 28 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 31

Randolph 107 0 0 2 73 0 0 0 41 0 223

Schuyler 23 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 0 33

Scotland 19 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 3 0 31

Shelby 18 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 6 0 39

St Charles 309 0 0 9 385 0 1 1 101 0 806

Warren 61 0 0 0 69 0 1 0 21 0 152 * Region Total * 2,511 1 0 39 2,181 0 12 10 1,027 2 5,783

Southeast Bollinger 30 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 37

Butler 176 0 0 3 91 0 0 0 31 0 301

Cape Girardeau 141 0 0 1 158 0 0 0 73 0 373

Carter 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 Crawford 52 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 53

70

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 77: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

TotalLS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 6 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Southeast Dent 24 0 0 0 198 0 0 0 68 0 290

Dunklin 79 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 29 0 126

Howell 45 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 50

Iron 44 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 45

Madison 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43

Maries 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13

Mississippi 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 38

New Madrid 69 0 0 2 60 0 0 0 51 0 182

Oregon 19 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 26 0 132

Pemiscot 90 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 6 0 103

Perry 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16

Phelps 104 0 0 1 108 0 0 0 33 0 246

Pulaski 66 0 0 8 164 0 0 0 57 0 295

Reynolds 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35

Ripley 46 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 23 1 116

Scott 71 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 61 0 209

Shannon 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

St Francois 131 0 0 1 332 0 0 0 63 1 528

Ste Genevieve 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18

Stoddard 148 0 0 0 147 0 0 0 152 0 447

Texas 41 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 48

Washington 103 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 104

Wayne 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 * Region Total * 1,687 0 0 20 1,512 0 0 0 682 2 3,903

Southwest Barry 116 0 0 3 254 0 1 0 35 0 409

Barton 19 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 10 0 92

Bates 27 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 32

Benton 9 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 5 0 23

Camden 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101

Cedar 13 0 0 1 48 0 0 0 6 0 68

Christian 80 0 0 4 234 0 0 0 34 0 352

Dade 6 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 39

Dallas 30 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 37

Douglas 35 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 41

Greene 855 0 0 15 930 0 2 27 150 0 1,979

Henry 78 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 34 0 232

Hickory 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

Jasper 591 5 0 1 665 0 5 0 98 0 1,365

Laclede 152 0 0 2 310 0 1 0 75 0 540

Lawrence 156 0 0 0 174 0 0 0 22 0 352

Mcdonald 70 0 0 1 103 0 0 0 17 1 192

Miller 67 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 71

Moniteau 13 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 15

Morgan 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31

Newton 211 0 0 5 299 0 0 0 49 0 564

Ozark 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22

Polk 40 0 0 0 248 0 0 0 47 0 335

St Clair 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

Stone 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94

Taney 254 0 0 6 92 0 0 0 28 0 380

Vernon 33 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 38

Webster 58 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 5 0 80

Wright 91 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 61 0 212 * Region Total * 3,278 6 1 44 3,668 0 10 27 687 1 7,722

Kansas City Jackson 1,923 2 117 18 2,210 0 10 38 300 0 4,618 * Region Total * 1,923 2 117 18 2,210 0 10 38 300 0 4,618

St. Louis St Louis City 600 0 1 8 1,381 0 8 53 452 0 2,503

St Louis County 824 2 2 11 1,249 0 14 0 394 0 2,496 * Region Total * 1,424 2 3 19 2,630 0 22 53 846 0 4,999

Other Icama 8 33 0 23 1,825 0 0 0 5 0 1,894 * Region Total * 8 33 0 23 1,825 0 0 0 5 0 1,894

State Total 11,975 45 121 191 15,547 0 58 132 3,863 5 31,937

71

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 78: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3

Atchison 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 5

Buchanan 21 12 0 4 2 0 1 40

Caldwell 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 15

Carroll 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Cass 185 33 0 16 9 6 18 267

Chariton 17 6 0 3 3 0 0 29

Clay 81 12 0 13 2 1 6 115

Clinton 36 6 0 2 2 0 3 49

Cooper 17 2 0 4 1 0 0 24

Daviess 13 2 0 7 13 0 1 36

De Kalb 18 0 0 0 2 0 2 22

Gentry 5 0 0 1 2 0 0 8

Grundy 30 4 0 2 3 0 6 45

Harrison 22 2 0 6 1 0 0 31

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 65 11 0 8 6 2 3 95

Lafayette 31 14 0 5 0 0 4 54

Linn 19 9 0 5 5 0 9 47

Livingston 6 3 0 3 2 0 0 14

Mercer 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 5

Nodaway 43 6 0 3 0 0 0 52

Pettis 24 9 0 8 5 4 4 54

Platte 21 2 0 4 4 0 1 32

Putnam 10 7 0 3 6 0 0 26

Ray 10 4 0 1 0 1 3 19

Saline 31 0 0 4 0 0 5 40

Sullivan 8 0 0 2 3 0 2 15

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 732 150 0 107 71 15 69 1,144

Northeast Adair 39 14 0 3 2 0 3 61

Audrain 23 4 0 12 2 1 6 48

Boone 165 22 0 19 13 1 8 228

Callaway 95 12 0 3 6 1 1 118

Clark 36 2 0 7 0 1 0 46

Cole 95 8 0 23 1 2 13 142

Franklin 191 35 0 24 19 9 12 290

Gasconade 22 0 0 1 0 0 0 23

Howard 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 15

Jefferson 361 69 0 38 69 14 23 574

Knox 7 0 0 1 0 0 2 10

Lewis 26 0 0 6 1 4 1 38

Lincoln 43 11 0 9 14 6 5 88

Macon 18 7 0 12 1 0 3 41

Marion 89 18 0 4 6 0 4 121

Monroe 7 4 0 0 0 0 1 12

Montgomery 14 4 0 9 0 0 0 27

Osage 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 7

Pike 31 13 0 9 4 0 0 57

Ralls 14 2 0 5 6 0 1 28

Randolph 66 9 0 13 12 2 5 107

Schuyler 14 3 0 1 4 0 1 23

Scotland 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 19

Shelby 11 5 0 1 1 0 0 18

St Charles 177 46 0 29 35 6 16 309

Warren 37 5 0 14 5 0 0 61 * Region Total * 1,614 294 0 244 201 47 111 2,511

Southeast Bollinger 27 0 0 0 3 0 0 30

Butler 86 36 0 17 12 5 20 176

Cape Girardeau 97 24 0 8 11 1 0 141 Carter 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 7

72

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 79: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Southeast Crawford 31 3 0 6 7 4 1 52

Dent 13 5 0 3 3 0 0 24

Dunklin 48 17 0 5 9 0 0 79

Howell 27 3 0 12 3 0 0 45

Iron 26 5 0 4 3 1 5 44

Madison 34 3 0 3 1 0 2 43

Maries 5 4 0 1 1 0 2 13

Mississippi 25 0 0 1 4 0 0 30

New Madrid 52 6 0 6 2 1 2 69

Oregon 16 0 0 3 0 0 0 19

Pemiscot 68 3 0 3 9 6 1 90

Perry 6 3 0 3 3 0 1 16

Phelps 47 25 0 13 6 0 13 104

Pulaski 42 9 0 9 6 0 0 66

Reynolds 18 5 0 4 2 1 5 35

Ripley 15 7 0 16 7 1 0 46

Scott 32 10 0 5 18 1 5 71

Shannon 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 5

St Francois 102 9 0 14 6 0 0 131

Ste Genevieve 12 3 0 2 0 0 0 17

Stoddard 73 33 0 11 21 0 10 148

Texas 33 3 0 2 0 0 3 41

Washington 70 20 0 7 3 2 1 103

Wayne 27 5 0 10 0 0 0 42 * Region Total * 1,037 242 0 174 140 23 71 1,687

Southwest Barry 82 9 0 11 6 1 7 116

Barton 13 1 0 2 2 0 1 19

Bates 13 8 0 6 0 0 0 27

Benton 6 0 0 2 1 0 0 9

Camden 69 2 0 15 13 1 1 101

Cedar 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 13

Christian 41 14 0 12 9 0 4 80

Dade 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 6

Dallas 17 4 0 4 4 1 0 30

Douglas 20 4 0 6 4 0 1 35

Greene 431 225 0 138 23 9 29 855

Henry 35 23 0 13 7 0 0 78

Hickory 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 11

Jasper 385 107 0 59 13 5 22 591

Laclede 107 20 0 12 8 1 4 152

Lawrence 95 27 0 21 7 3 3 156

Mcdonald 39 17 0 11 1 0 2 70

Miller 52 2 0 9 4 0 0 67

Moniteau 8 0 0 2 2 1 0 13

Morgan 26 0 0 4 0 1 0 31

Newton 135 48 0 13 5 0 10 211

Ozark 14 5 0 3 0 0 0 22

Polk 21 3 0 12 3 0 1 40

St Clair 7 2 0 5 1 0 0 15

Stone 70 5 0 15 1 1 2 94

Taney 143 58 0 38 7 1 7 254

Vernon 15 10 0 6 1 1 0 33

Webster 31 10 0 12 4 0 1 58

Wright 48 10 0 9 8 0 16 91 * Region Total * 1,940 614 0 447 140 26 111 3,278

Kansas City Jackson 1,134 422 0 155 59 14 139 1,923 * Region Total * 1,134 422 0 155 59 14 139 1,923

St. Louis St Louis City 306 112 0 116 33 19 14 600

St Louis County 415 159 0 111 59 17 63 824 * Region Total * 721 271 0 227 92 36 77 1,424

Other Icama 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 * Region Total * 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

State Total 7,186 1,993 0 1,354 703 161 578 11,975

73

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 80: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Average

Total Number of1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Northwest Andrew 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 7.00

Atchison 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 2.20

Buchanan 13 11 6 0 5 4 0 0 40 2.70

Caldwell 8 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 15 1.60

Carroll 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.50

Cass 96 67 30 28 15 23 3 4 267 2.99

Chariton 7 3 5 4 7 3 0 0 29 3.41

Clay 47 28 20 3 5 10 2 0 115 2.59

Clinton 18 16 9 1 0 3 2 0 49 2.69

Cooper 6 10 2 2 0 2 1 1 24 3.54

Daviess 15 5 3 4 3 5 1 0 36 3.11

De Kalb 11 6 2 0 2 1 0 0 22 2.09

Gentry 2 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 2.50

Grundy 23 5 5 8 2 0 0 2 45 3.33

Harrison 6 19 2 3 0 0 1 0 31 2.45

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Johnson 34 28 16 5 3 9 0 0 95 2.46

Lafayette 29 13 3 2 2 4 1 0 54 2.31

Linn 24 12 6 0 2 3 0 0 47 2.02

Livingston 4 1 2 4 0 1 1 1 14 4.57

Mercer 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 5.60

Nodaway 31 3 7 1 2 5 2 0 52 2.65

Pettis 17 14 5 5 1 6 3 3 54 4.39

Platte 9 11 2 2 1 7 0 0 32 2.97

Putnam 9 10 1 6 0 0 0 0 26 2.15

Ray 9 3 3 1 1 2 0 0 19 2.37

Saline 26 5 5 0 1 2 0 1 40 2.28

Sullivan 3 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 15 2.20

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

* Region Total * 450 290 138 84 52 97 17 12 1,144 2.82

Northeast Adair 31 10 12 3 1 1 0 0 61 1.80

Audrain 8 19 3 2 5 5 2 4 48 4.60

Boone 81 51 23 19 15 21 9 6 228 3.52

Callaway 51 25 21 5 5 6 3 2 118 2.92

Clark 8 10 16 5 3 3 1 0 46 3.28

Cole 42 37 20 12 5 14 5 6 142 3.76

Franklin 122 79 31 11 16 19 6 3 290 2.70

Gasconade 14 4 2 0 0 3 0 0 23 2.17

Howard 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1.20

Jefferson 247 151 63 45 15 33 13 6 574 2.66

Knox 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 1.80

Lewis 17 5 5 4 1 5 1 0 38 3.11

Lincoln 30 19 14 10 3 8 3 1 88 3.24

Macon 14 9 3 2 5 5 0 2 41 3.85

Marion 41 38 19 8 7 4 4 0 121 2.71

Monroe 5 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 12 1.92

Montgomery 4 6 3 2 2 6 3 1 27 5.04

Osage 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 7 2.43

Pike 27 13 2 2 3 5 3 2 57 3.60

Ralls 11 4 6 4 0 3 0 0 28 2.64

Randolph 36 31 10 4 5 15 4 2 107 3.57

Schuyler 4 7 4 6 1 1 0 0 23 2.83

Scotland 12 2 2 1 0 1 1 0 19 2.32

Shelby 13 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 18 1.61

St Charles 108 87 54 15 11 18 9 5 309 3.05

Warren 15 8 7 6 4 8 5 8 61 7.02

* Region Total * 963 627 327 166 107 187 72 48 2,511 3.11

Southeast Bollinger 21 5 0 1 2 1 0 0 30 1.83

Butler 88 34 11 15 12 12 4 0 176 2.52

Cape Girardeau 51 35 20 7 10 14 3 1 141 2.94

Carter 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 7 6.14

Number of Placements

74

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 81: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2013

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Average

Total Number of1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Southeast Crawford 19 17 3 2 2 6 2 0 52 2.87

Dent 8 6 1 1 2 2 1 3 24 5.92

Dunklin 34 10 6 9 8 3 2 4 79 3.54

Howell 23 5 2 2 1 6 4 2 45 3.91

Iron 30 3 1 3 2 3 0 1 44 2.36

Madison 17 8 4 5 2 2 2 3 43 4.07

Maries 7 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 13 1.77

Mississippi 13 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 30 1.77

New Madrid 34 15 4 8 1 4 3 0 69 2.65

Oregon 5 5 0 1 2 6 0 0 19 4.11

Pemiscot 32 18 12 5 7 10 5 1 90 3.39

Perry 8 4 0 1 0 1 1 1 16 3.56

Phelps 46 27 4 4 4 15 4 0 104 2.93

Pulaski 17 20 4 5 8 9 1 0 66 3.20

Reynolds 12 5 9 3 4 1 1 0 35 2.91

Ripley 14 10 5 3 3 7 2 2 46 4.24

Scott 36 16 6 5 1 6 1 0 71 2.38

Shannon 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 6.20

St Francois 52 32 22 10 7 6 0 2 131 2.80

Ste Genevieve 7 0 0 3 1 2 1 3 17 7.12

Stoddard 35 62 19 12 7 9 4 0 148 2.84

Texas 18 10 0 3 1 6 2 1 41 3.39

Washington 30 24 17 11 3 13 4 1 103 3.38

Wayne 18 7 6 5 2 3 0 1 42 2.98

* Region Total * 680 392 167 124 92 148 48 28 1,687 3.09

Southwest Barry 53 23 20 4 5 7 3 1 116 2.66

Barton 3 11 1 2 2 0 0 0 19 2.42

Bates 14 3 4 0 0 4 0 2 27 4.63

Benton 6 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 9 2.00

Camden 30 29 10 7 7 13 2 3 101 3.71

Cedar 2 5 1 2 0 3 0 0 13 3.54

Christian 28 15 10 11 6 7 0 2 80 3.21

Dade 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1.67

Dallas 5 10 6 4 1 4 0 0 30 3.13

Douglas 7 14 3 5 3 2 1 0 35 2.91

Greene 259 212 110 58 48 121 23 19 855 3.63

Henry 24 9 13 7 5 14 3 3 78 4.22

Hickory 3 2 0 3 0 1 1 1 11 4.91

Jasper 180 125 110 62 26 54 17 14 591 3.47

Laclede 68 30 20 12 1 9 7 5 152 3.36

Lawrence 33 50 27 12 8 18 5 3 156 3.65

Mcdonald 25 7 11 8 7 7 2 2 70 3.83

Miller 24 12 6 7 5 9 0 4 67 3.94

Moniteau 5 4 1 0 2 0 0 1 13 3.46

Morgan 7 10 5 1 2 4 2 0 31 3.58

Newton 71 56 25 12 17 21 7 0 211 3.00

Ozark 14 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 22 1.64

Polk 12 10 2 3 3 7 2 1 40 4.08

St Clair 7 4 0 3 0 1 0 0 15 2.20

Stone 25 28 14 7 2 16 1 0 94 3.15

Taney 117 48 34 18 7 15 8 7 254 3.02

Vernon 6 11 1 1 1 8 4 1 33 5.64

Webster 27 10 10 1 1 5 2 1 58 2.95

Wright 43 16 7 11 9 5 0 0 91 2.47

* Region Total * 1,100 763 452 265 169 355 90 70 3,278 3.42

Kansas City Jackson 702 502 253 151 84 162 38 12 1,923 2.81

* Region Total * 702 502 253 151 84 162 38 12 1,923 2.81

St. Louis St Louis City 155 121 83 41 33 88 36 40 600 5.00

St Louis County 265 206 109 60 28 93 30 28 824 3.86

* Region Total * 420 327 192 101 61 181 66 68 1,424 4.34

Other Icama 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 8 2.50 * Region Total * 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 8 2.50

State Total 4,317 2,902 1,533 892 565 1,130 331 238 11,975 3.26

Number of Placements

75

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 82: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

FY 2014 Adoptions are Year to Date (YTD)

FY 2014 TotalFY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 YTD Adoptions

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 3 3

Buchanan 2 8 9 2 4 1 26

Caldwell 1 2 2 6 5 0 16

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 30 15 27 18 22 1 113

Chariton 5 0 0 0 0 0 5

Clay 28 46 33 46 54 3 210

Clinton 1 2 0 0 0 0 3

Cooper 0 0 1 3 1 0 5

Daviess 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Grundy 2 3 6 4 6 0 21

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 1 0 0 0 5 0 6

Johnson 6 3 8 11 17 1 46

Lafayette 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Linn 3 8 6 4 4 1 26

Livingston 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 4 5 4 2 1 2 18

Pettis 13 10 13 11 14 0 61

Platte 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 2 3 4 2 13 0 24

Saline 18 13 14 10 5 5 65

Sullivan 0 2 1 1 0 0 4

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 116 120 130 122 156 17 661

Northeast Adair 3 4 10 1 6 0 24

Audrain 2 2 4 1 4 0 13

Boone 24 23 38 20 17 9 131

Callaway 0 4 0 0 1 0 5

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 10 15 7 9 21 6 68

Franklin 21 17 17 15 25 6 101

Gasconade 2 3 0 0 0 0 5

Howard 6 2 1 1 2 0 12

Jefferson 29 37 54 41 43 11 215

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 8 14 7 5 8 7 49

Macon 5 2 1 5 2 3 18

Marion 11 5 6 10 4 1 37

Monroe 0 0 3 0 0 0 3

Montgomery 0 0 0 3 0 0 3

Osage 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Pike 2 1 0 4 0 0 7

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 4 1 4 6 4 7 26

Schuyler 0 5 1 0 0 0 6

Scotland 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Shelby 0 1 1 0 1 0 3

St Charles 39 30 31 29 21 8 158

Warren 1 11 2 3 3 3 23 * Region Total * 167 178 188 153 162 61 909

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 3 0 0 2 5

Butler 8 10 5 4 16 1 44

Cape Girardeau 10 4 14 8 10 3 49

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crawford 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

76

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 83: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

FY 2014 Adoptions are Year to Date (YTD)

FY 2014 TotalFY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 YTD Adoptions

Dent 20 23 7 15 17 4 86

Dunklin 3 4 3 0 1 2 13

Howell 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Iron 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Southeast Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

New Madrid 7 2 2 7 5 2 25

Oregon 9 9 12 7 7 3 47

Pemiscot 0 3 0 2 1 0 6

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 20 6 21 14 7 3 71

Pulaski 14 10 17 9 12 3 65

Reynolds 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Ripley 5 5 9 1 3 1 24

Scott 4 6 3 2 4 0 19

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 30 16 34 33 47 13 173

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 17 11 15 12 14 2 71

Texas 1 0 0 1 3 2 7

Washington 0 0 0 1 0 1 2

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Region Total * 151 109 146 117 150 42 715

Southwest Barry 16 23 32 14 27 10 122

Barton 5 17 1 5 8 0 36

Bates 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Benton 0 0 4 3 1 0 8

Camden 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Cedar 2 2 1 8 6 0 19

Christian 11 14 21 49 17 3 115

Dade 1 2 5 4 0 0 12

Dallas 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Douglas 0 0 1 1 1 0 3

Greene 73 112 84 115 116 45 545

Henry 8 18 5 16 12 5 64

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 71 43 46 53 73 39 325

Laclede 25 53 33 40 29 8 188

Lawrence 15 22 12 11 6 3 69

Mcdonald 16 19 8 10 8 7 68

Miller 0 0 1 0 3 0 4

Moniteau 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 30 31 39 36 23 1 160

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 20 18 20 38 23 6 125

St Clair 0 2 0 1 0 0 3

Stone 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Taney 8 6 11 9 8 7 49

Vernon 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Webster 1 1 3 5 5 0 15

Wright 9 1 4 4 6 0 24 * Region Total * 313 387 332 422 378 134 1,966

Kansas City Jackson 172 183 212 194 231 60 1,052 * Region Total * 172 183 212 194 231 60 1,052

St. Louis St Louis City 92 79 71 59 66 22 389

St Louis County 78 76 86 81 76 19 416 * Region Total * 170 155 157 140 142 41 805

Other Icama 1 1 2 1 3 1 9 * Region Total * 1 1 2 1 3 1 9

State Total 1,090 1,133 1,167 1,149 1,222 356 6,117

77

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 84: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

October 2013

Total Re-Entries Total Entries

9,000

9,200

9,400

9,600

9,800

10,000

10,200

10,400

10,600

10,800

11,000

11,200

11,400

11,600

11,800

12,000

12,200

Oct

-11

Nov-1

1

Dec-

11

Jan-1

2

Feb-1

2

Mar-

12

Apr-

12

May-1

2

Jun-1

2

Jul-12

Aug-1

2

Sep-1

2

Oct

-12

Nov-1

2

Dec-

12

Jan-1

3

Feb-1

3

Mar-

13

Apr-

13

May-1

3

Jun-1

3

Jul-13

Aug-1

3

Sep-1

3

Oct

-13

Figure 17.

Children Active in Children's Division Custody

on the Last day of the MonthOctober 2011 - October 2013

78

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 85: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 18.

Children Closing from Alternative Care During October 2013 by Reason for Case Closing and Region

Other Returned Home

0

50

100

150

200

250

Oct

-11

Nov-1

1

Dec-

11

Jan-1

2

Feb-1

2

Mar-

12

Apr-

12

May-…

Jun-1

2

Jul-12

Aug-1

2

Sep-1

2

Oct

-12

Nov-1

2

Dec-

12

Jan-1

3

Feb-1

3

Mar-

13

Apr-

13

May-…

Jun-1

3

Jul-13

Aug-1

3

Sep-1

3

Oct

-13

Figure 19.

Adoptions Finalized by Month

October 2011 - October 2013

79

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 86: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +Current Age

Figure 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody as of

October 30, 2013 by Age and Placement Category

Group Home/Res. Care Relative Home Other Foster Home Adoptive Home

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

Oct-

09

Dec-0

9

Jan

-10

Mar-

10

May-1

0

Jul-10

Oct-

10

Dec-1

0

Jan

-11

Mar-

11

May-1

1

Jul-11

Oct-

11

Dec-1

1

Jan

-12

Mar-

12

May-1

2

Jul-12

Oct-

12

Dec-1

2

Jan

-13

Mar-

13

May-1

3

Jul-13

Oct-

13

Figure 21.

Children in Children's Division Custody as of the Last Day of the

Month October 2009 - October 2013 by Placement Category

Relative Home Group Home/Res. Care Other Adoptive Home Foster Home

80

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 87: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2009-1

2009-2

2009-3

2009-4

2010-1

2010-2

2010-3

2010-4

2011-1

2011-2

2011-3

2011-4

2012-1

2012-2

2012-3

2012-4

2013-1

2013-2

2013-3

2013-4

Ex

its p

er

10

0 C

hil

dre

n in

Fo

ste

r C

are

Po

pu

lati

on

Figure 22.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody

by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition1st Quarter 2009 Through 4th Quarter 2013

Return Home Other Closing Relative Home

Other Legal Status Child Independence Adoption

Data for the Fourth Quarter 2013 includes

the month of October 2013 only. 81

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 88: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 82

Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures

Table 14.

• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011

by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 15.

• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home Placements. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011

by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov. • Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 16.

• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.

Table 17. and Table 18.

• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the month. Table

values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.

Page 89: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 83

Table 19.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other • Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011

by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 20.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only. • Placement Types are: ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other) ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention FAH Foster Adoptive Home FG B Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FG H Foster Family Group Home FG M Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home FHE Emergency Foster Home FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home KHB Kinship Behavioral Home KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy MMD Medical Facility MMH Mental Health Facility RFA Residential Treatment Facility RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2 RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3 RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency

Table 20 (contd). RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity

Page 90: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 84

RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare RHB Behavioral Relative Home

RHM Medical Relative Home RHO Relative Home RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway SCH School TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site

Table 21.

• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only. • Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Table 22.

Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.

• Closing categories include the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to sending

state) Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative) Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship and

Other

Table 23.

• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal of 'AD'

and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father). • Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been completed (TPR

is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father). • Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children. • Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted

as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.

Table 24.

• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, and FH.

Page 91: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 85

• Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have either no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago.

• The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago”

represent unduplicated vendor counts.

Table 25.

• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody) LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 6 – Children’s Division relieved of legal responsibility LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care) LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement

Table 26.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Goals are:

01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s) AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child 06 - Child Independence/Independent Living 07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives 09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing

Table 27.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of placements

experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1. • The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors. • Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous vendor.

Table 28.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted

Page 92: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis

October 2013 86

as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.

Figure 18.

• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons:

Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s) Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.

Figure 19.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted

as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.

Figure 20.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Figure 21.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Group Home/Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMH, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Page 93: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Intensive In-Home Services

Page 94: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During October 2013

Grouped by Referral County

TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cooper 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Grundy 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Lafayette 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Linn 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Pettis 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Platte 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 1 3.13% 19 59.38% 12 37.50% 32

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7

Audrain 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Boone 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 5

Callaway 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6

Franklin 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Lincoln 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 5

Macon 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Marion 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Randolph 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Scotland 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Shelby 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Charles 0 0.00% 5 33.33% 10 66.67% 15

Warren 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3 * Region Total * 2 2.41% 35 42.17% 46 55.42% 83

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Butler 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

for Screening

Referrals Accepted

Accepted

Referrals

Accepted

Referrals Not

88

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 95: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During October 2013

Grouped by Referral County

TotalNumber Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 4

Howell 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Iron 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Phelps 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 5 45.45% 6 54.55% 11

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Stoddard 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 25 52.08% 23 47.92% 48

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Benton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cedar 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Christian 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 6 66.67% 9

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Douglas 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Greene 8 29.63% 5 18.52% 14 51.85% 27

Henry 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 8 80.00% 10

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 7

Laclede 0 0.00% 4 40.00% 6 60.00% 10

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8

Ozark 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Polk 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Stone 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Taney 0 0.00% 6 46.15% 7 53.85% 13

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Wright 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1 * Region Total * 9 8.41% 37 34.58% 61 57.01% 107

Kansas City Jackson 1 7.14% 7 50.00% 6 42.86% 14 * Region Total * 1 7.14% 7 50.00% 6 42.86% 14

St. Louis St Louis City 1 2.78% 17 47.22% 18 50.00% 36

St Louis County 3 6.82% 22 50.00% 19 43.18% 44 * Region Total * 4 5.00% 39 48.75% 37 46.25% 80

State Total 17 4.67% 162 44.51% 185 50.82% 364

Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not

for Screening Accepted Accepted

89

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 96: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During October 2013

Grouped by Household County

Average Average # of

Number of At-Risk

Total Total Children At-Risk Children

Families Children per Children per Accepted Accepted Family Accepted Family

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Buchanan 3 11 3.67 10 3.33

Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cass 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Clay 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Clinton 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Cooper 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Gentry 2 5 2.50 5 2.50

Grundy 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Johnson 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Lafayette 2 3 1.50 3 1.50

Linn 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Livingston 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pettis 2 5 2.50 2 1.00

Platte 1 7 7.00 7 7.00

Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Saline 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sullivan 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 * Region Total * 18 50 2.78 43 2.39

Northeast Adair 2 6 3.00 6 3.00

Audrain 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Boone 2 6 3.00 4 2.00

Callaway 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Clark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cole 3 7 2.33 7 2.33

Franklin 3 9 3.00 9 3.00

Gasconade 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Howard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Jefferson 4 13 3.25 13 3.25

Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Lewis 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Lincoln 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Macon 1 4 4.00 1 1.00

Marion 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Montgomery 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Osage 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Randolph 5 14 2.80 9 1.80

Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Scotland 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Shelby 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

St Charles 5 11 2.20 10 2.00

Warren 2 10 5.00 10 5.00 * Region Total * 35 100 2.86 85 2.43

Southeast Bollinger 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Butler 2 4 2.00 4 2.00

Cape Girardeau 5 7 1.40 7 1.40 Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

90

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 97: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During October 2013

Grouped by Household County

Average Average # of

Number of At-Risk

Total Total Children At-Risk Children

Families Children per Children per Accepted Accepted Family Accepted Family

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dunklin 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Howell 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Iron 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pemiscot 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Perry 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Phelps 2 7 3.50 7 3.50

Pulaski 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ripley 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Scott 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

St Francois 6 15 2.50 13 2.17

Ste Genevieve 2 3 1.50 3 1.50

Stoddard 3 11 3.67 11 3.67

Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Washington 2 3 1.50 2 1.00

Wayne 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 * Region Total * 26 59 2.27 56 2.15

Southwest Barry 1 5 5.00 5 5.00

Barton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Bates 1 3 3.00 2 2.00

Benton 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Camden 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cedar 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Christian 3 8 2.67 8 2.67

Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dallas 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Douglas 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Greene 13 32 2.46 31 2.38

Henry 2 11 5.50 11 5.50

Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Jasper 3 6 2.00 6 2.00

Laclede 4 9 2.25 9 2.25

Lawrence 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Mcdonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Miller 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Morgan 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Newton 3 6 2.00 5 1.67

Ozark 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Polk 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Stone 2 6 3.00 6 3.00

Taney 5 9 1.80 8 1.60

Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Webster 1 5 5.00 5 5.00

Wright 1 3 3.00 3 3.00 * Region Total * 46 118 2.57 114 2.48

Kansas City Jackson 11 33 3.00 28 2.55 * Region Total * 11 33 3.00 28 2.55

St. Louis St Louis City 18 51 2.83 44 2.44

St Louis County 21 73 3.48 58 2.76 * Region Total * 39 124 3.18 102 2.62

State Total 175 484 2.77 428 2.45

91

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 98: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2013

Total

Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pettis 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Northeast Adair 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Audrain 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Callaway 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

Franklin 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Jefferson 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Warren 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 * Region Total * 27 72.97% 9 24.32% 1 2.70% 37

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Intact Intact

Family Not

Other

92

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 99: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2013

Total

Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howell 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Phelps 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pulaski 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Francois 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15

Southwest Barry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cedar 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Henry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Laclede 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mcdonald 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Moniteau 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Newton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Taney 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wright 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 * Region Total * 23 79.31% 6 20.69% 0 0.00% 29

Kansas City Jackson 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 * Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

St. Louis St Louis City 8 72.73% 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 11

St Louis County 15 78.95% 2 10.53% 2 10.53% 19 * Region Total * 23 76.67% 4 13.33% 3 10.00% 30

State Total 104 80.00% 22 16.92% 4 3.08% 130

Family Not

Intact Intact Other

93

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 100: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During April 2013

Total

Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cass 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 10 62.50% 6 37.50% 0 0.00% 16

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Callaway 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Franklin 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Warren 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 * Region Total * 16 80.00% 2 10.00% 2 10.00% 20

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Cape Girardeau 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Intact

Family

Intact

Family Not

Other

94

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 101: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During April 2013

Total

Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 6

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 5 50.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 10

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Laclede 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wright 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 * Region Total * 9 56.25% 7 43.75% 0 0.00% 16

Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St. Louis St Louis City 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

St Louis County 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 10 * Region Total * 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 4 30.77% 13

State Total 47 66.20% 16 22.54% 8 11.27% 71

Intact Intact Other

Family Family Not

95

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 102: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2012

Total

Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 4

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Family

Intact

Family Not

OtherIntact

96

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 103: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2012

Total

Families Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mcdonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Kansas City Jackson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 * Region Total * 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 * Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

State Total 6 54.55% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 11

Family Family Not

Intact Intact Other

97

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

October 2013

Page 104: Children's Services Management Report€¦ · Octo Children’s Services Management Report Research and Data Analysis ber 2013 II Table of Contents Unless otherwise indicated, information

Children’s Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis October 2013

98

Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables

Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33. • Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question

and an exit status which is not missing. • Exit status includes the following status codes: Family Intact 10 Family Intact Family Not Intact 12 Child Ran Away 13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed) 14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered) 15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered) 16 In Foster Home or Group Home 17 In Residential 18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services) 19 In Juvenile Justice 20 In In-Patient Psychiatric Other 11 Can't Locate Family 21 Information Not Available 99 Other