Children's Services Management...

106
Department of Social Services Children's Division Children's Services Management Report October 2019 Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis 221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101

Transcript of Children's Services Management...

Page 1: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Department of Social Services Children's Division

Children's Services Management Report

October 2019

Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis

221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101

Page 2: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report

I Research and Data Analysis

State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:

“We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure and sustain healthy, safe, and productive lives." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.

Page 3: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis

Table of Contents

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.

Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month

to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.

Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V

Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)

Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those

Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2

Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4

Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6

Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8

Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10

Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12

Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14

Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14

Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15

Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15

Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16

Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments

Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16

Figure 8a. CA/N Investigations Completed During the Month ....................................................... 17

Figure 8b. CA/N Assessments Completed During the Month ......................................................... 17

Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18

Family-Centered Services (FCS)

Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22

Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24

Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26

Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28

Page 4: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis

Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30

Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32

Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34

Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36

Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36

Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37

Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37

Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38

Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement

By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38

Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39

Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40

Out-of-Home Placement

Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44

Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46

Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48

Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49

Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month

By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50

Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case

Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52

Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54

Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64

Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month

Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66

Page 5: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis

Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68

Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70

Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72

Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped

By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74

Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped

By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76

Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78

Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80

Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During

the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80

Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81

Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81

Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82

Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82

Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and

Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83

Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84

Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)

Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90

Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92

Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94

Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96

Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98

Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100

Page 6: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis

Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions

Page 7: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Child Abuse and Neglect

Page 8: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During October 2019

Compared to Those Reported During October 2018

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage

Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Northwest Andrew 9 12 -25.00% 13 18 -27.78%

Atchison 3 1 200.00% 3 2 50.00%

Buchanan 146 146 0.00% 204 193 5.70%

Caldwell 6 5 20.00% 10 8 25.00%

Carroll 9 9 0.00% 10 13 -23.08%

Cass 90 95 -5.26% 121 121 0.00%

Chariton 5 3 66.67% 7 5 40.00%

Clay 179 202 -11.39% 229 247 -7.29%

Clinton 15 23 -34.78% 24 32 -25.00%

Cooper 13 19 -31.58% 16 21 -23.81%

Daviess 7 7 0.00% 7 15 -53.33%

De Kalb 12 9 33.33% 14 10 40.00%

Gentry 7 6 16.67% 7 7 0.00%

Grundy 19 15 26.67% 26 28 -7.14%

Harrison 12 15 -20.00% 15 22 -31.82%

Holt 2 4 -50.00% 3 4 -25.00%

Johnson 43 42 2.38% 57 58 -1.72%

Lafayette 36 27 33.33% 56 33 69.70%

Linn 15 15 0.00% 17 25 -32.00%

Livingston 15 13 15.38% 19 18 5.56%

Mercer 3 4 -25.00% 5 6 -16.67%

Nodaway 21 7 200.00% 24 10 140.00%

Pettis 33 51 -35.29% 48 66 -27.27%

Platte 67 77 -12.99% 94 95 -1.05%

Putnam 3 14 -78.57% 5 17 -70.59%

Ray 20 32 -37.50% 28 47 -40.43%

Saline 39 35 11.43% 53 48 10.42%

Sullivan 3 6 -50.00% 6 8 -25.00%

Worth 1 2 -50.00% 1 3 -66.67%

* Region Total * 833 896 -7.03% 1,122 1,180 -4.92%

Northeast Adair 27 23 17.39% 38 34 11.76%

Audrain 33 33 0.00% 55 46 19.57%

Boone 159 126 26.19% 227 167 35.93%

Callaway 68 58 17.24% 110 80 37.50%

Clark 8 9 -11.11% 15 14 7.14%

Cole 65 59 10.17% 89 78 14.10%

Franklin 111 106 4.72% 141 151 -6.62%

Gasconade 26 25 4.00% 30 35 -14.29%

Howard 13 12 8.33% 16 19 -15.79%

Knox 2 2 0.00% 2 2 0.00%

Lewis 10 18 -44.44% 14 20 -30.00%

Lincoln 67 77 -12.99% 91 110 -17.27%

Macon 11 12 -8.33% 13 18 -27.78%

Marion 41 44 -6.82% 55 55 0.00%

Monroe 6 11 -45.45% 7 15 -53.33%

Montgomery 16 12 33.33% 28 17 64.71%

Osage 8 10 -20.00% 12 12 0.00%

Pike 22 23 -4.35% 30 30 0.00%

Ralls 8 10 -20.00% 8 13 -38.46%

Randolph 49 36 36.11% 81 61 32.79%

Schuyler 5 6 -16.67% 12 6 100.00%

Scotland 2 2 0.00% 4 4 0.00%

Shelby 4 6 -33.33% 5 8 -37.50%

St Charles 227 227 0.00% 282 298 -5.37%

Warren 31 52 -40.38% 39 76 -48.68%

* Region Total * 1,019 999 2.00% 1,404 1,369 2.56%

Southeast Bollinger 24 14 71.43% 32 21 52.38%

Butler 57 73 -21.92% 77 93 -17.20%

Cape Girardeau 72 64 12.50% 95 85 11.76%

Carter 11 8 37.50% 18 10 80.00%

Crawford 34 27 25.93% 49 32 53.13%

Dent 16 28 -42.86% 22 38 -42.11%

2Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 9: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During October 2019

Compared to Those Reported During October 2018

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage

Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Southeast Dunklin 41 39 5.13% 67 59 13.56%

Howell 72 55 30.91% 100 87 14.94%

Iron 14 22 -36.36% 18 27 -33.33%

Jefferson 167 187 -10.70% 234 259 -9.65%

Madison 17 15 13.33% 26 20 30.00%

Maries 4 14 -71.43% 4 21 -80.95%

Mississippi 27 9 200.00% 44 13 238.46%

New Madrid 20 30 -33.33% 29 37 -21.62%

Oregon 16 15 6.67% 26 25 4.00%

Pemiscot 29 24 20.83% 36 40 -10.00%

Perry 11 16 -31.25% 16 26 -38.46%

Phelps 44 39 12.82% 62 54 14.81%

Pulaski 53 60 -11.67% 72 75 -4.00%

Reynolds 8 7 14.29% 8 8 0.00%

Ripley 14 22 -36.36% 17 30 -43.33%

Scott 43 41 4.88% 75 46 63.04%

Shannon 7 9 -22.22% 11 13 -15.38%

St Francois 81 85 -4.71% 112 122 -8.20%

Ste Genevieve 17 24 -29.17% 27 32 -15.63%

Stoddard 26 33 -21.21% 36 42 -14.29%

Texas 29 35 -17.14% 43 48 -10.42%

Washington 31 29 6.90% 36 41 -12.20%

Wayne 15 14 7.14% 34 22 54.55%

* Region Total * 1,000 1,038 -3.66% 1,426 1,426 0.00%

Southwest Barry 42 49 -14.29% 51 66 -22.73%

Barton 19 17 11.76% 26 27 -3.70%

Bates 19 12 58.33% 26 17 52.94%

Benton 14 15 -6.67% 19 20 -5.00%

Camden 53 55 -3.64% 77 73 5.48%

Cedar 14 24 -41.67% 17 32 -46.88%

Christian 74 107 -30.84% 92 136 -32.35%

Dade 9 2 350.00% 9 3 200.00%

Dallas 27 20 35.00% 38 27 40.74%

Douglas 14 11 27.27% 20 13 53.85%

Greene 457 476 -3.99% 600 628 -4.46%

Henry 29 17 70.59% 39 26 50.00%

Hickory 12 10 20.00% 13 13 0.00%

Jasper 155 179 -13.41% 198 243 -18.52%

Laclede 68 57 19.30% 99 79 25.32%

Lawrence 60 71 -15.49% 75 111 -32.43%

McDonald 20 33 -39.39% 24 48 -50.00%

Miller 34 35 -2.86% 46 55 -16.36%

Moniteau 12 16 -25.00% 22 18 22.22%

Morgan 25 24 4.17% 36 33 9.09%

Newton 63 47 34.04% 83 53 56.60%

Ozark 9 10 -10.00% 11 14 -21.43%

Polk 60 52 15.38% 76 89 -14.61%

St Clair 15 8 87.50% 19 16 18.75%

Stone 28 39 -28.21% 35 48 -27.08%

Taney 84 83 1.20% 112 116 -3.45%

Vernon 29 31 -6.45% 45 42 7.14%

Webster 44 49 -10.20% 58 64 -9.38%

Wright 36 30 20.00% 48 46 4.35%

* Region Total * 1,525 1,579 -3.42% 2,014 2,156 -6.59%

Kansas City Jackson 756 807 -6.32% 1,059 1,083 -2.22%

* Region Total * 756 807 -6.32% 1,059 1,083 -2.22%

St. Louis St Louis City 317 361 -12.19% 441 517 -14.70%

St Louis County 604 665 -9.17% 770 847 -9.09%

* Region Total * 921 1,026 -10.23% 1,211 1,364 -11.22%

Other Out Home Inv 199 192 3.65% 254 231 9.96%

Out Of State 22 10 120.00% 30 10 200.00%

* Region Total * 221 202 9.41% 284 241 17.84%

State Total 6,275 6,547 -4.15% 8,520 8,819 -3.39%

3Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 10: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During October 2019

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per

tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 8 0 8 0.00 1.92

Atchison 0 0 1 7 0 8 0.00 6.77

Buchanan 12 1 27 104 1 145 0.57 6.92

Caldwell 1 1 0 3 0 5 0.42 2.08

Carroll 0 0 3 13 0 16 0.00 7.30

Cass 1 0 26 73 1 101 0.04 3.83

Chariton 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 1.70

Clay 5 15 43 219 2 284 0.09 4.96

Clinton 0 0 5 20 0 25 0.00 4.91

Cooper 5 0 5 21 0 31 1.26 7.79

Daviess 4 0 1 2 0 7 1.78 3.11

De Kalb 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00 0.87

Gentry 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.00 1.21

Grundy 2 1 0 14 0 17 0.81 6.89

Harrison 0 0 10 8 0 18 0.00 8.10

Holt 0 0 1 4 0 5 0.00 5.15

Johnson 2 0 16 32 0 50 0.17 4.15

Lafayette 3 0 8 28 3 42 0.37 5.13

Linn 1 4 0 6 0 11 0.32 3.49

Livingston 1 0 6 15 1 23 0.30 6.91

Mercer 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 1.04

Nodaway 1 1 0 12 0 14 0.23 3.28

Pettis 5 0 9 19 4 37 0.46 3.43

Platte 7 1 15 59 2 84 0.32 3.82

Putnam 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.86 0.86

Ray 3 0 8 40 2 53 0.51 9.03

Saline 2 1 16 30 0 49 0.37 9.08

Sullivan 0 1 0 5 0 6 0.00 3.69

Worth 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 4.50

* Region Total * 56 26 201 749 18 1,050 0.26 4.85

Northeast Adair 0 4 3 28 0 35 0.00 7.04

Audrain 4 2 6 47 0 59 0.63 9.26

Boone 11 3 23 125 9 171 0.32 4.99

Callaway 5 0 10 39 1 55 0.50 5.50

Clark 0 0 0 11 0 11 0.00 6.41

Cole 3 1 18 35 0 57 0.17 3.18

Franklin 6 3 13 60 1 83 0.24 3.31

Gasconade 0 1 6 18 1 26 0.00 7.73

Howard 4 5 1 13 0 23 1.84 10.56

Knox 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.00 0.97

Lewis 1 0 2 4 0 7 0.42 2.92

Lincoln 4 0 16 43 1 64 0.27 4.35

Macon 0 0 0 8 0 8 0.00 2.12

Marion 8 5 8 30 1 52 1.16 7.55

Monroe 0 1 2 5 1 9 0.00 4.37

Montgomery 0 5 1 9 2 17 0.00 5.96

Osage 3 0 1 5 0 9 0.87 2.62

Pike 4 2 4 34 0 44 0.97 10.71

Ralls 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 2.94

Randolph 7 0 6 45 0 58 1.19 9.87

Schuyler 0 1 0 3 0 4 0.00 3.51

Scotland 0 1 0 10 0 11 0.00 8.08

Shelby 2 0 3 9 0 14 1.25 8.77

St Charles 10 2 26 104 6 148 0.11 1.59

Warren 5 2 7 30 2 46 0.62 5.66

* Region Total * 77 38 157 722 25 1,019 0.30 3.91

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 1.71

Butler 9 3 32 51 2 97 0.90 9.73

Cape Girardeau 0 0 3 18 0 21 0.00 1.27

Carter 1 0 4 4 0 9 0.66 5.94

Crawford 4 1 23 42 4 74 0.67 12.33

Dent 0 1 6 32 4 43 0.00 11.77

4Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 11: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During October 2019

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per

tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Southeast Dunklin 3 5 17 31 4 60 0.37 7.42

Howell 12 0 27 58 6 103 1.19 10.23

Iron 2 0 2 12 0 16 0.83 6.66

Jefferson 14 9 27 183 1 234 0.25 4.26

Madison 0 0 4 3 0 7 0.00 2.39

Maries 0 0 1 7 0 8 0.00 3.71

Mississippi 2 0 0 11 0 13 0.63 4.08

New Madrid 0 0 6 10 0 16 0.00 3.54

Oregon 1 0 5 34 0 40 0.41 16.49

Pemiscot 0 0 4 10 0 14 0.00 2.78

Perry 5 0 1 15 0 21 1.05 4.41

Phelps 0 1 4 28 2 35 0.00 3.57

Pulaski 0 0 2 23 1 26 0.00 2.07

Reynolds 1 1 2 11 0 15 0.65 9.79

Ripley 0 7 13 37 2 59 0.00 17.84

Scott 3 0 6 25 0 34 0.30 3.45

Shannon 1 1 5 2 0 9 0.51 4.57

St Francois 12 6 29 49 6 102 0.83 7.08

Ste Genevieve 2 0 6 5 3 16 0.47 3.79

Stoddard 1 0 10 23 3 37 0.15 5.42

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Washington 2 1 8 11 0 22 0.33 3.63

Wayne 13 0 3 21 0 37 4.63 13.19

* Region Total * 88 36 250 761 38 1,173 0.40 5.33

Southwest Barry 0 3 10 25 2 40 0.00 4.63

Barton 1 0 1 9 1 12 0.31 3.73

Bates 0 0 5 10 0 15 0.00 3.53

Benton 8 1 3 23 0 35 2.33 10.18

Camden 4 1 8 27 1 41 0.48 4.89

Cedar 1 2 7 7 0 17 0.30 5.14

Christian 17 1 22 59 3 102 0.80 4.81

Dade 0 0 4 2 0 6 0.00 3.36

Dallas 1 0 10 15 2 28 0.24 6.72

Douglas 1 0 0 11 1 13 0.33 4.25

Greene 21 12 111 369 7 520 0.36 8.91

Henry 3 0 2 32 0 37 0.61 7.47

Hickory 1 1 3 8 0 13 0.60 7.81

Jasper 7 5 53 77 3 145 0.23 4.79

Laclede 0 1 5 28 4 38 0.00 4.27

Lawrence 2 2 29 35 1 69 0.20 6.78

McDonald 1 5 10 37 0 53 0.15 8.19

Miller 4 3 3 23 2 35 0.65 5.70

Moniteau 0 1 5 20 0 26 0.00 6.62

Morgan 0 0 0 13 0 13 0.00 2.87

Newton 1 2 16 40 1 60 0.07 4.06

Ozark 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.00 1.54

Polk 0 1 8 39 1 49 0.00 6.39

St Clair 0 0 0 4 0 4 0.00 2.04

Stone 1 0 6 24 0 31 0.17 5.14

Taney 1 0 16 36 8 61 0.09 5.34

Vernon 0 0 7 35 0 42 0.00 7.98

Webster 3 3 6 47 5 64 0.30 6.38

Wright 0 0 4 21 0 25 0.00 5.13

* Region Total * 78 44 357 1,076 42 1,597 0.30 6.12

Kansas City Jackson 30 13 149 671 66 929 0.18 5.61

* Region Total * 30 13 149 671 66 929 0.18 5.61

St. Louis St Louis City 19 3 66 168 37 293 0.28 4.34

St Louis County 9 10 56 109 18 202 0.04 0.86

* Region Total * 28 13 122 277 55 495 0.09 1.64

Other Out Home Inv 9 1 127 43 12 192 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 9 1 127 43 12 192 0.00 0.00

State Total 366 171 1,363 4,299 256 6,455 0.26 4.53

5Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 12: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During October 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6

Buchanan 9 7.97% 1 0.89% 24 21.24% 79 69.91% 0 0.00% 113

Caldwell 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 10 90.91% 0 0.00% 11

Cass 1 1.39% 0 0.00% 23 31.94% 47 65.28% 1 1.39% 72

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clay 4 1.79% 13 5.80% 38 16.96% 167 74.55% 2 0.89% 224

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 22.22% 14 77.78% 0 0.00% 18

Cooper 4 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 20.00% 12 60.00% 0 0.00% 20

Daviess 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Grundy 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 8 80.00% 0 0.00% 10

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Johnson 2 5.71% 0 0.00% 10 28.57% 23 65.71% 0 0.00% 35

Lafayette 2 7.14% 0 0.00% 8 28.57% 17 60.71% 1 3.57% 28

Linn 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6

Livingston 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 11 73.33% 1 6.67% 15

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Nodaway 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 7 77.78% 0 0.00% 9

Pettis 1 3.85% 0 0.00% 8 30.77% 14 53.85% 3 11.54% 26

Platte 4 7.02% 1 1.75% 10 17.54% 40 70.18% 2 3.51% 57

Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 2 5.71% 0 0.00% 7 20.00% 24 68.57% 2 5.71% 35

Saline 2 6.45% 1 3.23% 11 35.48% 17 54.84% 0 0.00% 31

Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 40 5.30% 21 2.78% 158 20.93% 523 69.27% 13 1.72% 755

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 2 8.00% 3 12.00% 20 80.00% 0 0.00% 25

Audrain 2 4.88% 1 2.44% 5 12.20% 33 80.49% 0 0.00% 41

Boone 7 5.47% 3 2.34% 17 13.28% 94 73.44% 7 5.47% 128

Callaway 3 7.14% 0 0.00% 10 23.81% 28 66.67% 1 2.38% 42

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cole 3 6.98% 1 2.33% 14 32.56% 25 58.14% 0 0.00% 43

Franklin 6 9.84% 3 4.92% 12 19.67% 39 63.93% 1 1.64% 61

Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 4.76% 4 19.05% 15 71.43% 1 4.76% 21

Howard 2 15.39% 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 13

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Lincoln 4 8.33% 0 0.00% 12 25.00% 32 66.67% 0 0.00% 48

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Marion 5 12.50% 3 7.50% 6 15.00% 25 62.50% 1 2.50% 40

Monroe 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 8

Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 8

Osage 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7

Pike 3 8.82% 1 2.94% 3 8.82% 27 79.41% 0 0.00% 34

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5

Randolph 4 11.43% 0 0.00% 6 17.14% 25 71.43% 0 0.00% 35

Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6

Shelby 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6

St Charles 9 7.90% 1 0.88% 21 18.42% 77 67.54% 6 5.26% 114

Warren 4 10.81% 2 5.41% 6 16.22% 23 62.16% 2 5.41% 37

* Region Total * 58 7.83% 23 3.10% 128 17.27% 511 68.96% 21 2.83% 741

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Butler 5 7.81% 2 3.13% 23 35.94% 33 51.56% 1 1.56% 64

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 17.65% 14 82.35% 0 0.00% 17

Carter 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Crawford 4 8.70% 1 2.17% 13 28.26% 26 56.52% 2 4.35% 46

Dent 0 0.00% 1 3.13% 5 15.63% 22 68.75% 4 12.50% 32

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment

6Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 13: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During October 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 2 6.25% 1 3.13% 10 31.25% 16 50.00% 3 9.38% 32

Howell 7 9.46% 0 0.00% 22 29.73% 41 55.41% 4 5.41% 74

Iron 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 10 71.43% 0 0.00% 14

Jefferson 11 6.63% 8 4.82% 13 7.83% 133 80.12% 1 0.60% 166

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6

Mississippi 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 88.89% 0 0.00% 9

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 36.36% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11

Oregon 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 4 18.18% 17 77.27% 0 0.00% 22

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 9

Perry 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 6 60.00% 0 0.00% 10

Phelps 0 0.00% 1 4.17% 4 16.67% 18 75.00% 1 4.17% 24

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 5.26% 17 89.47% 1 5.26% 19

Reynolds 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11

Ripley 0 0.00% 2 6.25% 8 25.00% 21 65.63% 1 3.13% 32

Scott 1 4.00% 0 0.00% 6 24.00% 18 72.00% 0 0.00% 25

Shannon 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 5 55.56% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9

St Francois 9 12.50% 3 4.17% 19 26.39% 37 51.39% 4 5.56% 72

Ste Genevieve 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 4 36.36% 5 45.46% 1 9.09% 11

Stoddard 1 4.17% 0 0.00% 6 25.00% 16 66.67% 1 4.17% 24

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 2 11.77% 1 5.88% 7 41.18% 7 41.18% 0 0.00% 17

Wayne 3 15.79% 0 0.00% 2 10.53% 14 73.68% 0 0.00% 19

* Region Total * 56 7.08% 22 2.78% 173 21.87% 516 65.23% 24 3.03% 791

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 2 6.90% 9 31.03% 16 55.17% 2 6.90% 29

Barton 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 8

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 41.67% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 12

Benton 2 9.52% 1 4.76% 3 14.29% 15 71.43% 0 0.00% 21

Camden 2 6.67% 1 3.33% 6 20.00% 21 70.00% 0 0.00% 30

Cedar 1 7.14% 1 7.14% 7 50.00% 5 35.71% 0 0.00% 14

Christian 5 7.04% 1 1.41% 20 28.17% 43 60.56% 2 2.82% 71

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

Dallas 1 4.00% 0 0.00% 10 40.00% 13 52.00% 1 4.00% 25

Douglas 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 75.00% 1 12.50% 8

Greene 15 4.02% 7 1.88% 81 21.72% 264 70.78% 6 1.61% 373

Henry 3 12.00% 0 0.00% 2 8.00% 20 80.00% 0 0.00% 25

Hickory 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 9

Jasper 5 4.24% 5 4.24% 42 35.59% 63 53.39% 3 2.54% 118

Laclede 0 0.00% 1 3.85% 5 19.23% 18 69.23% 2 7.69% 26

Lawrence 2 3.92% 2 3.92% 20 39.22% 26 50.98% 1 1.96% 51

McDonald 1 3.23% 3 9.68% 7 22.58% 20 64.52% 0 0.00% 31

Miller 2 9.09% 3 13.64% 3 13.64% 13 59.09% 1 4.55% 22

Moniteau 0 0.00% 1 5.56% 3 16.67% 14 77.78% 0 0.00% 18

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 9

Newton 1 2.00% 2 4.00% 15 30.00% 31 62.00% 1 2.00% 50

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 0 0.00% 1 2.56% 8 20.51% 29 74.36% 1 2.56% 39

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Stone 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 4 19.05% 16 76.19% 0 0.00% 21

Taney 1 2.22% 0 0.00% 15 33.33% 28 62.22% 1 2.22% 45

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 26.92% 19 73.08% 0 0.00% 26

Webster 3 6.82% 2 4.55% 6 13.64% 29 65.91% 4 9.09% 44

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 22.22% 14 77.78% 0 0.00% 18

* Region Total * 48 4.17% 34 2.95% 289 25.09% 754 65.45% 27 2.34% 1,152

Kansas City Jackson 23 3.47% 10 1.51% 129 19.49% 457 69.03% 43 6.50% 662

* Region Total * 23 3.47% 10 1.51% 129 19.49% 457 69.03% 43 6.50% 662

St. Louis St Louis City 14 7.00% 3 1.50% 48 24.00% 111 55.50% 24 12.00% 200

St Louis County 7 4.35% 7 4.35% 49 30.44% 83 51.55% 15 9.32% 161

* Region Total * 21 5.82% 10 2.77% 97 26.87% 194 53.74% 39 10.80% 361

Other Out Home Inv 7 4.35% 1 0.62% 108 67.08% 33 20.50% 12 7.45% 161

* Region Total * 7 4.35% 1 0.62% 108 67.08% 33 20.50% 12 7.45% 161

State Total 253 5.47% 121 2.62% 1,082 23.41% 2,988 64.63% 179 3.87% 4,623

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other

7Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 14: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Atchison 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Buchanan 87 79.82% 17 15.60% 5 4.59% 109

Caldwell 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Carroll 10 90.91% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 11

Cass 62 87.32% 9 12.68% 0 0.00% 71

Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clay 195 91.12% 13 6.08% 6 2.80% 214

Clinton 13 76.47% 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 17

Cooper 15 75.00% 4 20.00% 1 5.00% 20

Daviess 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

De Kalb 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Harrison 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Holt 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Johnson 31 91.18% 3 8.82% 0 0.00% 34

Lafayette 27 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 27

Linn 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Livingston 12 85.71% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 14

Mercer 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Nodaway 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Pettis 20 86.96% 2 8.70% 1 4.35% 23

Platte 47 92.16% 4 7.84% 0 0.00% 51

Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 29 87.88% 4 12.12% 0 0.00% 33

Saline 30 96.77% 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 31

Sullivan 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Worth 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 641 88.66% 68 9.41% 14 1.94% 723

Northeast Adair 22 88.00% 3 12.00% 0 0.00% 25

Audrain 39 95.12% 2 4.88% 0 0.00% 41

Boone 90 75.00% 24 20.00% 6 5.00% 120

Callaway 40 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 40

Clark 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5

Cole 43 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 43

Franklin 50 84.75% 9 15.25% 0 0.00% 59

Gasconade 13 65.00% 7 35.00% 0 0.00% 20

Howard 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Lincoln 41 91.11% 2 4.44% 2 4.44% 45

Macon 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Marion 33 84.62% 6 15.39% 0 0.00% 39

Monroe 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Montgomery 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Osage 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Pike 28 82.35% 6 17.65% 0 0.00% 34

Ralls 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Randolph 30 85.71% 3 8.57% 2 5.71% 35

Schuyler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Shelby 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

St Charles 98 90.74% 8 7.41% 2 1.85% 108

Warren 33 94.29% 2 5.71% 0 0.00% 35

* Region Total * 622 87.24% 77 10.80% 14 1.96% 713

Southeast Bollinger 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Butler 55 87.30% 7 11.11% 1 1.59% 63

Cape Girardeau 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17

Carter 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Crawford 32 72.73% 11 25.00% 1 2.27% 44

Dent 19 70.37% 7 25.93% 1 3.70% 27

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

8Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 15: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 26 89.66% 3 10.35% 0 0.00% 29

Howell 59 85.51% 7 10.15% 3 4.35% 69

Iron 12 85.71% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 14

Jefferson 133 82.61% 27 16.77% 1 0.62% 161

Madison 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Maries 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6

Mississippi 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

New Madrid 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Oregon 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22

Pemiscot 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Perry 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Phelps 15 65.22% 8 34.78% 0 0.00% 23

Pulaski 13 72.22% 5 27.78% 0 0.00% 18

Reynolds 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Ripley 29 93.55% 2 6.45% 0 0.00% 31

Scott 24 96.00% 1 4.00% 0 0.00% 25

Shannon 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

St Francois 56 82.35% 7 10.29% 5 7.35% 68

Ste Genevieve 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10

Stoddard 19 86.36% 2 9.09% 1 4.55% 22

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 11 64.71% 6 35.29% 0 0.00% 17

Wayne 18 94.74% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19

* Region Total * 643 84.61% 104 13.68% 13 1.71% 760

Southwest Barry 24 88.89% 2 7.41% 1 3.70% 27

Barton 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Bates 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12

Benton 19 90.48% 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 21

Camden 17 58.62% 12 41.38% 0 0.00% 29

Cedar 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Christian 64 94.12% 3 4.41% 1 1.47% 68

Dade 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Dallas 21 87.50% 1 4.17% 2 8.33% 24

Douglas 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Greene 304 84.92% 54 15.08% 0 0.00% 358

Henry 23 92.00% 2 8.00% 0 0.00% 25

Hickory 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Jasper 101 90.99% 9 8.11% 1 0.90% 111

Laclede 18 81.82% 4 18.18% 0 0.00% 22

Lawrence 42 85.71% 4 8.16% 3 6.12% 49

McDonald 28 93.33% 2 6.67% 0 0.00% 30

Miller 19 90.48% 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 21

Moniteau 15 88.24% 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 17

Morgan 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9

Newton 46 93.88% 3 6.12% 0 0.00% 49

Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 31 83.78% 6 16.22% 0 0.00% 37

St Clair 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

Stone 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

Taney 39 88.64% 4 9.09% 1 2.27% 44

Vernon 26 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 26

Webster 34 85.00% 6 15.00% 0 0.00% 40

Wright 17 94.44% 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 18

* Region Total * 970 87.94% 124 11.24% 9 0.82% 1,103

Kansas City Jackson 449 75.85% 105 17.74% 38 6.42% 592

* Region Total * 449 75.85% 105 17.74% 38 6.42% 592

St. Louis St Louis City 103 60.95% 61 36.10% 5 2.96% 169

St Louis County 99 72.26% 36 26.28% 2 1.46% 137

* Region Total * 202 66.01% 97 31.70% 7 2.29% 306

Other Out Home Inv 152 94.41% 8 4.97% 1 0.62% 161

* Region Total * 152 94.41% 8 4.97% 1 0.62% 161

State Total 3,679 84.42% 583 13.38% 96 2.20% 4,358

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

9Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 16: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Atchison 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Buchanan 20 18.52% 14 12.96% 61 56.48% 13 12.04% 0 0.00% 108

Caldwell 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Carroll 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 9

Cass 12 17.65% 12 17.65% 26 38.24% 18 26.47% 0 0.00% 68

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clay 54 26.60% 2 0.99% 147 72.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 203

Clinton 2 11.11% 2 11.11% 13 72.22% 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 18

Cooper 8 40.00% 0 0.00% 12 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

Daviess 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Grundy 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Harrison 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Holt 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Johnson 12 36.36% 0 0.00% 21 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33

Lafayette 8 29.63% 2 7.41% 17 62.96% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 27

Linn 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Livingston 2 14.29% 2 14.29% 9 64.29% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Pettis 8 32.00% 2 8.00% 15 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 25

Platte 10 17.86% 5 8.93% 37 66.07% 4 7.14% 0 0.00% 56

Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 6 17.65% 4 11.77% 18 52.94% 6 17.65% 0 0.00% 34

Saline 8 28.57% 6 21.43% 7 25.00% 7 25.00% 0 0.00% 28

Sullivan 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Worth 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 165 23.40% 58 8.23% 424 60.14% 58 8.23% 0 0.00% 705

Northeast Adair 3 12.00% 2 8.00% 14 56.00% 5 20.00% 1 4.00% 25

Audrain 7 18.92% 1 2.70% 29 78.38% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 37

Boone 10 8.13% 19 15.45% 35 28.46% 21 17.07% 38 30.89% 123

Callaway 11 27.50% 2 5.00% 25 62.50% 2 5.00% 0 0.00% 40

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cole 15 35.71% 3 7.14% 21 50.00% 3 7.14% 0 0.00% 42

Franklin 12 20.34% 9 15.25% 24 40.68% 14 23.73% 0 0.00% 59

Gasconade 5 23.81% 1 4.76% 15 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21

Howard 1 7.69% 3 23.08% 7 53.85% 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 13

Knox 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Lincoln 10 22.73% 6 13.64% 24 54.55% 4 9.09% 0 0.00% 44

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Marion 12 30.00% 3 7.50% 23 57.50% 2 5.00% 0 0.00% 40

Monroe 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Montgomery 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Osage 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Pike 7 22.58% 0 0.00% 20 64.52% 4 12.90% 0 0.00% 31

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Randolph 3 8.82% 7 20.59% 11 32.35% 9 26.47% 4 11.77% 34

Schuyler 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Shelby 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

St Charles 9 7.97% 24 21.24% 37 32.74% 39 34.51% 4 3.54% 113

Warren 11 32.35% 2 5.88% 21 61.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 34

* Region Total * 130 18.18% 87 12.17% 344 48.11% 106 14.83% 48 6.71% 715

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

Butler 14 22.95% 16 26.23% 19 31.15% 12 19.67% 0 0.00% 61

Cape Girardeau 2 12.50% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 6 37.50% 2 12.50% 16

Carter 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Crawford 5 10.87% 14 30.44% 15 32.61% 12 26.09% 0 0.00% 46

Dent 2 6.67% 5 16.67% 18 60.00% 5 16.67% 0 0.00% 30

Investigations Assessments

0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days

Note: Investigations and Assessments reported

separately beginning July 2016. 10Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 17: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During October 2019

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 7 23.33% 8 26.67% 2 6.67% 12 40.00% 1 3.33% 30

Howell 26 37.14% 5 7.14% 34 48.57% 5 7.14% 0 0.00% 70

Iron 3 21.43% 1 7.14% 7 50.00% 3 21.43% 0 0.00% 14

Jefferson 11 6.92% 21 13.21% 77 48.43% 41 25.79% 9 5.66% 159

Madison 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Maries 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

Mississippi 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 7 77.78% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

New Madrid 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 11

Oregon 5 22.73% 0 0.00% 16 72.73% 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 22

Pemiscot 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 5 55.56% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Perry 0 0.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 10

Phelps 1 4.55% 4 18.18% 5 22.73% 10 45.46% 2 9.09% 22

Pulaski 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 11 61.11% 6 33.33% 0 0.00% 18

Reynolds 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 4 40.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10

Ripley 3 9.68% 7 22.58% 12 38.71% 9 29.03% 0 0.00% 31

Scott 4 18.18% 3 13.64% 8 36.36% 7 31.82% 0 0.00% 22

Shannon 7 77.78% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

St Francois 28 38.89% 4 5.56% 39 54.17% 1 1.39% 0 0.00% 72

Ste Genevieve 5 45.46% 1 9.09% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Stoddard 7 33.33% 1 4.76% 10 47.62% 3 14.29% 0 0.00% 21

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 8 47.06% 2 11.77% 6 35.29% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17

Wayne 5 26.32% 0 0.00% 7 36.84% 7 36.84% 0 0.00% 19

* Region Total * 159 20.89% 101 13.27% 329 43.23% 157 20.63% 15 1.97% 761

Southwest Barry 11 42.31% 0 0.00% 15 57.69% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 26

Barton 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Bates 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Benton 5 27.78% 1 5.56% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18

Camden 4 16.00% 5 20.00% 12 48.00% 4 16.00% 0 0.00% 25

Cedar 9 64.29% 0 0.00% 5 35.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Christian 20 28.99% 7 10.15% 42 60.87% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 69

Dade 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Dallas 10 41.67% 1 4.17% 13 54.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 24

Douglas 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 7 87.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Greene 80 22.35% 25 6.98% 219 61.17% 30 8.38% 4 1.12% 358

Henry 5 20.83% 0 0.00% 19 79.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 24

Hickory 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Jasper 52 45.61% 2 1.75% 60 52.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 114

Laclede 4 15.39% 3 11.54% 16 61.54% 2 7.69% 1 3.85% 26

Lawrence 23 46.94% 2 4.08% 24 48.98% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 49

McDonald 11 36.67% 0 0.00% 19 63.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 30

Miller 6 28.57% 3 14.29% 6 28.57% 6 28.57% 0 0.00% 21

Moniteau 1 6.25% 3 18.75% 9 56.25% 2 12.50% 1 6.25% 16

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 55.56% 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 9

Newton 17 35.42% 2 4.17% 29 60.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 48

Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 7 18.42% 2 5.26% 27 71.05% 2 5.26% 0 0.00% 38

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Stone 4 20.00% 1 5.00% 15 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

Taney 8 18.18% 8 18.18% 20 45.46% 7 15.91% 1 2.27% 44

Vernon 7 30.44% 0 0.00% 15 65.22% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23

Webster 9 20.93% 3 6.98% 31 72.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 43

Wright 1 5.88% 3 17.65% 11 64.71% 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 17

* Region Total * 309 28.04% 72 6.53% 654 59.35% 59 5.35% 8 0.73% 1,102

Kansas City Jackson 127 20.55% 51 8.25% 360 58.25% 79 12.78% 1 0.16% 618

* Region Total * 127 20.55% 51 8.25% 360 58.25% 79 12.78% 1 0.16% 618

St. Louis St Louis City 43 22.28% 29 15.03% 85 44.04% 36 18.65% 0 0.00% 193

St Louis County 39 24.38% 32 20.00% 57 35.63% 13 8.13% 19 11.88% 160

* Region Total * 82 23.23% 61 17.28% 142 40.23% 49 13.88% 19 5.38% 353

Other Out Home Inv 124 77.02% 4 2.48% 33 20.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 161

* Region Total * 124 77.02% 4 2.48% 33 20.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 161

State Total 1,096 24.82% 434 9.83% 2,286 51.78% 508 11.51% 91 2.06% 4,415

0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days

Investigations Assessments

Note: Investigations and Assessments reported

separately beginning July 2016. 11Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 18: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During October 2019

CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality

Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Northwest Andrew 3 6 0 1 2 1 0 13

Atchison 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3

Buchanan 49 88 9 6 15 28 0 195

Caldwell 3 3 0 1 0 4 0 11

Carroll 0 8 1 0 0 4 0 13

Cass 31 56 3 3 10 15 0 118

Chariton 1 4 0 0 0 2 0 7

Clay 62 105 12 18 21 20 0 238

Clinton 5 9 1 1 4 5 0 25

Cooper 6 7 0 0 1 5 0 19

Daviess 2 5 0 0 1 0 0 8

De Kalb 3 9 0 0 2 2 0 16

Gentry 3 4 0 0 0 1 0 8

Grundy 3 16 0 1 1 6 0 27

Harrison 5 7 0 0 0 1 0 13

Holt 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3

Johnson 18 24 1 3 2 3 0 51

Lafayette 11 24 1 4 4 5 0 49

Linn 2 12 1 1 0 1 0 17

Livingston 9 4 2 0 0 4 0 19

Mercer 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 4

Nodaway 8 12 1 0 2 2 0 25

Pettis 12 19 2 4 4 10 0 51

Platte 17 46 4 2 13 7 0 89

Putnam 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 6

Ray 0 19 1 2 2 3 0 27

Saline 7 31 1 3 2 2 0 46

Sullivan 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 6

Worth 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

* Region Total * 262 531 40 51 89 137 0 1,110

Northeast Adair 10 16 1 0 1 4 0 32

Audrain 7 25 1 5 3 8 0 49

Boone 52 93 14 12 14 15 0 200

Callaway 26 42 0 2 11 17 0 98

Clark 3 5 0 0 0 2 0 10

Cole 24 36 5 10 3 15 0 93

Franklin 34 72 5 11 4 15 0 141

Gasconade 9 15 2 2 1 7 0 36

Howard 4 9 0 1 0 5 0 19

Knox 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3

Lewis 4 5 1 1 1 5 0 17

Lincoln 23 40 4 5 4 17 0 93

Macon 5 6 0 0 2 5 0 18

Marion 19 22 0 0 3 8 0 52

Monroe 2 3 1 3 1 1 0 11

Montgomery 4 11 1 1 1 9 0 27

Osage 1 5 2 1 3 1 0 13

Pike 12 9 1 1 2 1 0 26

Ralls 5 3 0 0 3 1 0 12

Randolph 14 34 1 3 3 7 0 62

Schuyler 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 6

Scotland 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 4

Shelby 1 3 0 1 0 2 0 7

St Charles 79 131 17 12 20 29 0 288

Warren 12 19 0 4 6 7 0 48

* Region Total * 352 611 56 75 87 184 0 1,365

Southeast Bollinger 6 18 0 0 0 2 0 26

Butler 20 37 0 7 6 11 0 81

Cape Girardeau 18 51 3 1 10 9 0 92

Carter 5 6 0 1 0 4 0 16

Crawford 9 24 1 2 5 10 0 51

Dent 7 7 2 1 1 4 0 22

12Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 19: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During October 2019

CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality

Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Southeast Dunklin 14 24 3 5 5 8 0 59

Howell 21 48 3 6 6 12 0 96

Iron 3 10 1 1 1 2 0 18

Jefferson 52 113 2 21 7 42 0 237

Madison 5 10 2 5 0 4 0 26

Maries 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 5

Mississippi 16 11 0 0 1 5 0 33

New Madrid 7 13 0 2 2 5 0 29

Oregon 4 9 3 1 1 6 0 24

Pemiscot 12 16 1 2 2 5 0 38

Perry 3 8 0 0 2 4 0 17

Phelps 14 26 4 4 2 10 0 60

Pulaski 24 25 4 1 5 16 0 75

Reynolds 5 3 0 0 0 1 0 9

Ripley 5 9 0 1 2 3 0 20

Scott 17 25 1 3 4 4 0 54

Shannon 1 6 0 1 0 1 0 9

St Francois 28 49 4 9 7 20 0 117

Ste Genevieve 7 8 2 2 1 3 0 23

Stoddard 12 11 3 0 3 9 0 38

Texas 9 18 2 3 4 8 0 44

Washington 13 18 0 3 4 10 0 48

Wayne 3 11 1 1 2 2 0 20

* Region Total * 343 615 42 83 83 221 0 1,387

Southwest Barry 12 30 0 4 7 8 0 61

Barton 6 12 1 1 2 2 0 24

Bates 6 13 0 2 5 8 0 34

Benton 6 8 0 1 2 2 0 19

Camden 18 32 3 3 5 19 0 80

Cedar 8 6 0 3 0 5 0 22

Christian 25 44 5 4 14 27 0 119

Dade 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 9

Dallas 11 16 0 2 2 9 0 40

Douglas 1 12 1 0 2 12 0 28

Greene 151 280 26 43 66 106 0 672

Henry 8 19 2 3 2 4 0 38

Hickory 2 9 1 2 2 2 0 18

Jasper 51 100 4 13 16 36 0 220

Laclede 18 43 7 6 6 19 0 99

Lawrence 17 40 3 1 5 19 0 85

McDonald 12 7 1 1 3 6 0 30

Miller 8 25 1 1 3 9 0 47

Moniteau 1 11 0 0 0 5 0 17

Morgan 5 20 0 1 0 7 0 33

Newton 21 34 8 6 5 10 0 84

Ozark 2 7 0 1 0 3 0 13

Polk 22 34 4 2 8 11 0 81

St Clair 4 11 0 0 4 2 0 21

Stone 5 19 4 1 4 22 0 55

Taney 20 59 5 9 7 29 0 129

Vernon 11 18 0 2 3 5 0 39

Webster 16 26 2 3 5 17 0 69

Wright 14 21 1 1 2 11 0 50

* Region Total * 486 960 79 116 180 415 0 2,236

Kansas City Jackson 286 417 53 108 68 149 0 1,081

* Region Total * 286 417 53 108 68 149 0 1,081

St. Louis St Louis City 100 199 18 56 17 53 0 443

St Louis County 225 353 26 74 48 94 0 820

* Region Total * 325 552 44 130 65 147 0 1,263

Other Out Home Inv 196 3 0 0 1 1 0 201

Out Of State 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 22

Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 77

* Region Total * 207 14 0 0 1 1 77 300

State Total 2,261 3,700 314 563 573 1,254 77 8,742

13Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 20: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0% 0%

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

7,500O

ct-1

5

Jan

-16

Ap

r-1

6

Jul-

16

Oct

-16

Jan

-17

Ap

r-1

7

Jul-

17

Oct

-17

Jan

-18

Ap

r-1

8

Jul-

18

Oct

-18

Jan

-19

Ap

r-1

9

Jul-

19

Oct

-19

Figure 2.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

October 2015 Through October 2019

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

7,500

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

Figure 3.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

November 2017 Through October 2019

Nov 2017 to Oct 2018 Nov 2018 to Oct 2019

14Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 21: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0% 0%

-30%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 4.

Percentage Change in CA/N Reports

Made Twelve Months ApartOctober 2018 and October 2019

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 5.

CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During October 2019 by Conclusion

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other

15Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 22: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0% 0%

Substantiated5%

Unsubstantiated P S I3%

Unsubstantiated22%

Family Assessment66%

Other4%

Figure 6.

CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During October 2019 by Conclusion

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 7.

Time Between Report and Child Contact

For Investigations/Assessments Completed in October 2019

Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact

16Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 23: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 8a.

CA/N Investigations Completed

During October 2019

Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 8b.

CA/N Assessments Completed

During October 2019

Within 45 Days Within 46-90 Days More Than 90 Days

17Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 24: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures

Table 1.

• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.

• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents

during any given month).

Table 2.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents

during any given month).

• Conclusions are as follows:

Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence, Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified

Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated

Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-

Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe,

Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation),

Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)

• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

Table 3.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,

Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated

Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated

Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-

cooperative/Child Safe, Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days,

Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Page 25: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,

Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School

Investigation)

Table 4.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include

information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-

Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.

Table 5.

• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.

Table 6.

• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.

• Administrative referrals are not included.

Figure 2. and Figure 3.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month.

Figure 4.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.

Figure 5. and Figure 6.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,

Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified

Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated

Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-

cooperative/Child Safe,

Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Page 26: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 20 Research and Data Analysis

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,

Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School

Investigation)

• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.

• Figures do not include information on expunged reports and reports where the only

alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already

Investigated.

Figure 7.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include

information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-

Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.

Figure 8a. and Figure 8b.

• Based upon investigations and assessments completed during the month.

Page 27: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Family-Centered Services

Page 28: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of October 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Buchanan 4 3 1 1 23 1 33

Caldwell 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Carroll 0 2 0 0 1 0 3

Cass 1 2 4 0 4 2 13

Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Clay 0 5 4 0 9 0 18

Clinton 0 3 1 0 0 0 4

Cooper 0 1 1 1 4 0 7

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

Grundy 1 3 0 0 3 0 7

Harrison 0 1 0 1 4 0 6

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 2 0 2 1 5

Lafayette 0 1 0 2 5 0 8

Linn 1 3 2 0 0 1 7

Livingston 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 0 1 3 0 5

Pettis 4 3 0 0 6 1 14

Platte 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Putnam 0 4 0 0 2 0 6

Ray 0 1 0 1 1 0 3

Saline 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 11 36 17 8 85 6 163

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 6 0 6

Audrain 2 0 1 1 4 2 10

Boone 6 10 2 1 29 4 52

Callaway 5 1 0 2 14 5 27

Clark 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Cole 0 4 0 0 9 1 14

Franklin 4 5 0 9 15 0 33

Gasconade 0 2 0 1 3 0 6

Howard 0 1 0 0 4 0 5

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Lincoln 1 3 4 0 16 0 24

Macon 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Marion 3 1 1 1 5 0 11

Monroe 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Montgomery 0 1 0 0 4 0 5

Osage 0 1 0 1 0 0 2

Pike 1 3 1 1 1 0 7

Ralls 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Randolph 0 1 0 3 8 0 12

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Scotland 0 1 1 0 1 0 3

Shelby 0 0 1 0 1 0 2

St Charles 1 0 1 0 20 0 22

Warren 1 5 0 0 7 0 13

* Region Total * 24 45 12 20 159 12 272

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 1 0 12 0 14

Butler 2 19 2 6 13 0 42

Cape Girardeau 4 4 2 1 45 3 59

Carter 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

Crawford 1 1 0 1 6 0 9

Dent 0 2 0 1 9 0 12

22Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 29: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of October 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 1 1 3 7 0 12

Howell 5 1 0 8 29 0 43

Iron 0 0 0 3 3 0 6

Jefferson 0 3 2 3 36 2 46

Madison 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Maries 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Mississippi 0 1 0 3 4 0 8

New Madrid 0 3 0 2 14 0 19

Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Pemiscot 0 1 0 3 15 0 19

Perry 0 0 0 0 15 0 15

Phelps 1 5 2 1 15 0 24

Pulaski 1 6 0 1 18 0 26

Reynolds 0 1 0 1 8 0 10

Ripley 1 1 0 0 3 0 5

Scott 0 1 0 3 11 0 15

Shannon 0 3 0 1 5 0 9

St Francois 0 4 0 1 31 0 36

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Stoddard 1 2 0 0 12 1 16

Texas 0 1 0 0 11 0 12

Washington 0 0 0 0 4 1 5

Wayne 0 1 0 0 11 1 13

* Region Total * 17 62 10 44 346 8 487

Southwest Barry 0 1 0 0 8 1 10

Barton 0 1 2 1 3 0 7

Bates 0 1 0 0 8 0 9

Benton 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Camden 1 6 0 1 8 0 16

Cedar 0 2 0 0 3 1 6

Christian 0 3 0 2 13 0 18

Dade 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Dallas 1 2 0 0 5 0 8

Douglas 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Greene 1 7 0 0 112 1 121

Henry 0 1 0 2 12 0 15

Hickory 0 2 0 0 2 0 4

Jasper 0 22 0 3 77 2 104

Laclede 1 4 1 1 6 0 13

Lawrence 0 4 0 0 17 0 21

McDonald 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Miller 0 3 0 0 20 0 23

Moniteau 0 1 0 0 5 0 6

Morgan 0 1 0 0 6 0 7

Newton 0 5 0 0 8 1 14

Ozark 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

Polk 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

St Clair 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Stone 0 5 0 0 6 0 11

Taney 0 3 0 2 27 1 33

Vernon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Webster 0 1 0 2 12 0 15

Wright 0 0 0 1 9 0 10

* Region Total * 4 83 4 16 386 7 500

Kansas City Jackson 0 3 14 18 106 53 194

* Region Total * 0 3 14 18 106 53 194

St. Louis St Louis City 2 2 1 0 53 1 59

St Louis County 6 4 13 2 19 7 51

* Region Total * 8 6 14 2 72 8 110

State Total 64 235 71 108 1,154 94 1,726

23Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 30: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Buchanan 7 3 1 2 31 1 45

Caldwell 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Carroll 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Cass 1 4 6 0 5 2 18

Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Clay 0 5 4 0 9 0 18

Clinton 0 3 1 0 0 0 4

Cooper 0 1 1 1 4 0 7

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Gentry 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Grundy 1 5 0 0 3 0 9

Harrison 0 1 0 1 4 0 6

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 1 3 0 2 1 7

Lafayette 0 1 0 2 8 0 11

Linn 1 4 2 0 0 1 8

Livingston 0 2 0 0 3 0 5

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 0 1 6 0 8

Pettis 4 3 0 0 6 1 14

Platte 0 0 0 1 6 0 7

Putnam 0 4 0 0 3 0 7

Ray 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Saline 0 1 0 1 3 0 5

Sullivan 0 0 1 0 1 0 2

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 14 44 20 11 108 6 203

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 6 0 6

Audrain 3 1 1 2 6 2 15

Boone 7 12 4 1 32 5 61

Callaway 5 1 0 2 14 5 27

Clark 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Cole 0 4 0 0 10 1 15

Franklin 5 6 0 9 18 0 38

Gasconade 1 3 0 1 5 0 10

Howard 0 1 0 0 4 0 5

Knox 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Lewis 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Lincoln 1 5 4 0 17 0 27

Macon 0 4 0 0 5 0 9

Marion 3 1 1 1 6 0 12

Monroe 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Montgomery 1 3 0 0 6 0 10

Osage 0 1 0 1 0 0 2

Pike 1 3 1 1 2 0 8

Ralls 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Randolph 0 2 0 3 8 0 13

Schuyler 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Scotland 0 2 1 0 1 0 4

Shelby 0 0 1 0 1 0 2

St Charles 1 0 1 1 22 0 25

Warren 1 5 0 0 9 0 15

* Region Total * 29 60 14 22 184 13 322

Southeast Bollinger 0 3 1 0 14 0 18

Butler 2 20 2 7 17 0 48

Cape Girardeau 4 4 2 1 48 4 63

Carter 1 0 0 1 1 0 3

Crawford 1 3 0 1 8 0 13

Dent 0 3 0 1 9 0 13

24Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 31: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 2 1 3 10 0 16

Howell 5 1 0 8 31 0 45

Iron 0 0 0 3 3 0 6

Jefferson 0 4 2 5 45 2 58

Madison 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

Maries 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Mississippi 0 1 0 5 4 0 10

New Madrid 0 4 0 3 15 0 22

Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Pemiscot 0 1 0 3 15 0 19

Perry 0 0 0 0 16 0 16

Phelps 1 5 2 1 16 0 25

Pulaski 1 7 0 2 18 0 28

Reynolds 0 1 0 1 8 0 10

Ripley 1 1 0 0 4 0 6

Scott 0 1 0 3 13 0 17

Shannon 0 3 0 2 5 0 10

St Francois 0 5 0 1 34 0 40

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

Stoddard 1 2 0 0 12 1 16

Texas 0 1 0 0 11 0 12

Washington 0 2 0 0 5 1 8

Wayne 0 1 0 0 12 1 14

* Region Total * 17 75 10 52 385 9 548

Southwest Barry 0 1 0 0 9 1 11

Barton 0 2 2 1 3 0 8

Bates 0 1 0 1 8 0 10

Benton 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Camden 1 6 0 1 10 0 18

Cedar 0 2 0 0 3 1 6

Christian 0 3 0 2 14 0 19

Dade 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Dallas 1 2 0 0 5 0 8

Douglas 1 0 0 0 5 0 6

Greene 1 7 0 0 127 1 136

Henry 0 1 0 2 13 0 16

Hickory 0 2 0 0 2 0 4

Jasper 0 23 0 4 90 3 120

Laclede 3 4 1 2 10 0 20

Lawrence 0 4 0 0 17 0 21

McDonald 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Miller 0 3 0 0 20 0 23

Moniteau 0 1 0 0 5 0 6

Morgan 0 1 0 0 7 0 8

Newton 0 6 0 0 8 1 15

Ozark 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

Polk 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

St Clair 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Stone 0 5 0 0 7 0 12

Taney 0 3 0 3 31 1 38

Vernon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Webster 0 1 0 2 12 0 15

Wright 0 0 0 1 10 0 11

* Region Total * 7 86 4 20 432 8 557

Kansas City Jackson 0 3 15 22 118 55 213

* Region Total * 0 3 15 22 118 55 213

St. Louis St Louis City 2 4 1 1 57 1 66

St Louis County 7 5 15 2 19 10 58

* Region Total * 9 9 16 3 76 11 124

State Total 76 277 79 130 1,303 102 1,967

25Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 32: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During October 2019

Child Total Persons with

Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Northwest Andrew 3 4 0 7 0

Atchison 3 3 0 6 0

Buchanan 83 93 0 176 11

Caldwell 6 6 0 12 0

Carroll 5 8 0 13 0

Cass 31 31 0 62 19

Chariton 2 1 0 3 0

Clay 42 39 0 81 0

Clinton 9 8 0 17 0

Cooper 15 15 0 30 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 2 3 0 5 3

Gentry 13 13 0 26 12

Grundy 17 26 0 43 8

Harrison 12 16 0 28 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 9 14 0 23 5

Lafayette 19 21 0 40 0

Linn 17 20 0 37 3

Livingston 9 11 0 20 1

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 11 18 0 29 5

Pettis 38 31 0 69 6

Platte 14 14 0 28 0

Putnam 13 19 0 32 1

Ray 9 8 0 17 0

Saline 9 9 0 18 0

Sullivan 6 6 0 12 3

Worth 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 397 437 0 834 77

Northeast Adair 14 19 0 33 4

Audrain 24 32 0 56 8

Boone 121 149 0 270 44

Callaway 55 59 0 114 23

Clark 6 10 0 16 1

Cole 27 24 0 51 3

Franklin 99 92 0 191 18

Gasconade 23 24 0 47 8

Howard 13 19 0 32 4

Knox 3 2 0 5 0

Lewis 4 7 0 11 0

Lincoln 41 65 0 106 16

Macon 12 26 0 38 13

Marion 22 33 0 55 5

Monroe 8 8 0 16 0

Montgomery 18 26 0 44 11

Osage 5 6 0 11 3

Pike 14 20 0 34 10

Ralls 5 8 0 13 2

Randolph 25 28 0 53 10

Schuyler 7 10 0 17 1

Scotland 9 10 0 19 2

Shelby 4 7 0 11 0

St Charles 52 50 0 102 16

Warren 29 32 0 61 13

* Region Total * 640 766 0 1,406 215

Southeast Bollinger 31 38 0 69 20

Butler 86 106 0 192 19

Cape Girardeau 115 145 0 260 28

Carter 5 7 0 12 0

Crawford 30 31 0 61 10

Dent 31 34 0 65 9

26Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 33: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During October 2019

Child Total Persons with

Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Southeast Dunklin 27 38 0 65 6

Howell 90 92 0 182 15

Iron 12 9 0 21 2

Jefferson 140 121 2 263 46

Madison 9 10 0 19 3

Maries 4 2 0 6 0

Mississippi 24 22 0 46 13

New Madrid 36 44 0 80 13

Oregon 1 2 0 3 0

Pemiscot 30 44 0 74 3

Perry 25 46 0 71 6

Phelps 46 48 0 94 10

Pulaski 57 74 0 131 15

Reynolds 27 24 0 51 5

Ripley 12 17 0 29 3

Scott 25 44 0 69 6

Shannon 20 17 0 37 0

St Francois 85 96 0 181 18

Ste Genevieve 7 10 0 17 4

Stoddard 26 32 0 58 3

Texas 26 31 0 57 2

Washington 14 21 1 36 4

Wayne 31 37 0 68 14

* Region Total * 1,072 1,242 3 2,317 277

Southwest Barry 16 19 0 35 4

Barton 20 10 0 30 4

Bates 15 20 0 35 3

Benton 7 6 0 13 0

Camden 29 40 0 69 14

Cedar 10 12 0 22 11

Christian 30 29 0 59 8

Dade 3 8 0 11 2

Dallas 13 23 0 36 4

Douglas 15 10 0 25 1

Greene 293 299 6 598 68

Henry 27 37 0 64 7

Hickory 7 9 0 16 1

Jasper 228 289 0 517 72

Laclede 41 39 0 80 4

Lawrence 42 56 0 98 10

McDonald 8 18 0 26 0

Miller 71 54 0 125 8

Moniteau 14 14 0 28 0

Morgan 15 19 0 34 0

Newton 33 32 1 66 11

Ozark 3 5 0 8 4

Polk 9 13 0 22 0

St Clair 10 9 0 19 5

Stone 21 24 0 45 4

Taney 62 83 0 145 18

Vernon 1 1 0 2 0

Webster 32 40 0 72 11

Wright 27 26 0 53 18

* Region Total * 1,102 1,244 7 2,353 292

Kansas City Jackson 395 474 0 869 233

* Region Total * 395 474 0 869 233

St. Louis St Louis City 118 160 0 278 39

St Louis County 95 134 0 229 42

* Region Total * 213 294 0 507 81

State Total 3,819 4,457 10 8,286 1,175

27Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 34: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During October 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 1 1 0 0 3 0 5

Caldwell 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 1 1 2 0 0 0 4

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Clinton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Cooper 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 2 8 2 1 13 0 26

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Audrain 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

Boone 1 2 0 0 4 1 8

Callaway 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Clark 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Cole 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Franklin 1 1 0 1 2 0 5

Gasconade 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Howard 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Lincoln 1 0 0 0 2 0 3

Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Osage 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Pike 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 1 0 1 1 0 3

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

St Charles 0 0 0 0 8 0 8

Warren 0 2 0 0 1 0 3

* Region Total * 4 10 1 4 31 2 52

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 1 0 5 0 6

Butler 0 8 0 1 3 0 12

Cape Girardeau 1 1 0 0 8 0 10

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dent 0 2 0 0 2 0 4

28Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 35: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During October 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Howell 2 0 0 2 2 0 6

Iron 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Jefferson 0 1 0 0 6 0 7

Madison 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

New Madrid 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Perry 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Phelps 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Pulaski 0 1 0 0 4 0 5

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Ripley 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Scott 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Shannon 0 2 0 1 0 0 3

St Francois 0 1 0 0 6 0 7

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Texas 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 1 0 0 7 0 8

* Region Total * 3 20 1 6 68 0 98

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Barton 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Bates 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 2 0 1 0 0 3

Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 1 2

Christian 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Dade 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Greene 1 3 0 0 22 0 26

Henry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Jasper 0 4 0 1 10 0 15

Laclede 0 1 0 1 0 0 2

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Moniteau 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Morgan 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Newton 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Taney 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Wright 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

* Region Total * 1 20 0 3 54 1 79

Kansas City Jackson 0 2 1 3 22 7 35

* Region Total * 0 2 1 3 22 7 35

St. Louis St Louis City 0 1 0 0 14 0 15

St Louis County 0 1 1 0 2 0 4

* Region Total * 0 2 1 0 16 0 19

State Total 10 62 6 17 204 10 309

29Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 36: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During October 2019

by Close Reason

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed

Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 8 66.67% 4 33.33% 12

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cass 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Gentry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Grundy 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Lafayette 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Livingston 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Saline 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 29 69.05% 13 30.95% 42

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 6

Boone 5 55.56% 4 44.44% 9

Callaway 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clark 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Franklin 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Gasconade 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Macon 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Marion 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Schuyler 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3

Warren 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

* Region Total * 33 55.93% 26 44.07% 59

Southeast Bollinger 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Butler 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6

Cape Girardeau 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Crawford 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Dent 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Goal Achieved Other

30Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 37: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During October 2019

by Close Reason

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed

Southeast Dunklin 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Howell 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 8 66.67% 4 33.33% 12

Madison 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

New Madrid 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Phelps 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Pulaski 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Scott 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Shannon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

St Francois 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5

Ste Genevieve 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Wayne 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 31 50.00% 31 50.00% 62

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Barton 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Bates 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Greene 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 18

Henry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 12 75.00% 4 25.00% 16

Laclede 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Newton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Stone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Taney 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Wright 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

* Region Total * 31 50.00% 31 50.00% 62

Kansas City Jackson 14 73.68% 5 26.32% 19

* Region Total * 14 73.68% 5 26.32% 19

St. Louis St Louis City 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 7

St Louis County 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 8

* Region Total * 10 66.67% 5 33.33% 15

State Total 148 57.14% 111 42.86% 259

Goal Achieved Other

31Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 38: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2019

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 5 71.43% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 6 46.15% 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 13

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Gentry 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5

Grundy 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Livingston 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Pettis 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 25 53.19% 12 25.53% 4 8.51% 6 12.77% 47

Northeast Adair 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Audrain 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Boone 11 45.83% 3 12.50% 5 20.83% 5 20.83% 24

Callaway 2 14.29% 6 42.86% 2 14.29% 4 28.57% 14

Clark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cole 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Franklin 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 4

Gasconade 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Howard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 2 25.00% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 8

Macon 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 3

Ralls 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Randolph 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 71.43% 7

Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scotland 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 9

Warren 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

* Region Total * 41 37.96% 27 25.00% 12 11.11% 28 25.93% 108

Southeast Bollinger 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Butler 9 81.82% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Cape Girardeau 6 40.00% 6 40.00% 1 6.67% 2 13.33% 15

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Crawford 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Dent 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

32Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 39: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2019

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Howell 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Iron 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Jefferson 8 27.59% 4 13.79% 6 20.69% 11 37.93% 29

Madison 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

New Madrid 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Perry 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Phelps 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 7

Pulaski 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Reynolds 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Ripley 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Scott 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stoddard 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Washington 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Wayne 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

* Region Total * 78 56.52% 31 22.46% 12 8.70% 17 12.32% 138

Southwest Barry 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Barton 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Bates 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cedar 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Christian 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dallas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Douglas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Greene 22 61.11% 7 19.44% 6 16.67% 1 2.78% 36

Henry 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3

Hickory 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Jasper 14 37.84% 13 35.14% 5 13.51% 5 13.51% 37

Laclede 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Lawrence 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Ozark 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Stone 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Taney 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 9

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Wright 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

* Region Total * 70 47.30% 47 31.76% 17 11.49% 14 9.46% 148

Kansas City Jackson 45 36.59% 35 28.46% 22 17.89% 21 17.07% 123

* Region Total * 45 36.59% 35 28.46% 22 17.89% 21 17.07% 123

St. Louis St Louis City 9 45.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 10 50.00% 20

St Louis County 7 26.92% 3 11.54% 3 11.54% 13 50.00% 26

* Region Total * 16 34.78% 4 8.70% 3 6.52% 23 50.00% 46

State Total 275 45.08% 156 25.57% 70 11.48% 109 17.87% 610

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

33Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 40: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2019

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Atchison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Buchanan 21 55.26% 10 26.32% 2 5.26% 5 13.16% 38

Caldwell 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Carroll 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Cass 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Chariton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clay 11 61.11% 6 33.33% 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 18

Clinton 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Cooper 5 71.43% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Harrison 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Lafayette 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Linn 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Livingston 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5

Pettis 6 60.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 10

Platte 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Putnam 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6

Ray 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Saline 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 105 67.31% 32 20.51% 9 5.77% 10 6.41% 156

Northeast Adair 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Audrain 4 40.00% 5 50.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10

Boone 21 56.76% 11 29.73% 2 5.41% 3 8.11% 37

Callaway 9 69.23% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 1 7.69% 13

Clark 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 6 46.15% 4 30.77% 3 23.08% 0 0.00% 13

Franklin 14 41.18% 10 29.41% 7 20.59% 3 8.82% 34

Gasconade 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Howard 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Lincoln 13 68.42% 5 26.32% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19

Macon 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Marion 4 44.44% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 9

Monroe 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Montgomery 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Schuyler 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Scotland 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Shelby 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

St Charles 14 87.50% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16

Warren 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

* Region Total * 130 60.75% 56 26.17% 19 8.88% 9 4.21% 214

Southeast Bollinger 6 60.00% 2 20.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10

Butler 17 45.95% 10 27.03% 6 16.22% 4 10.81% 37

Cape Girardeau 16 33.33% 24 50.00% 2 4.17% 6 12.50% 48

Carter 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3

Crawford 1 11.11% 8 88.89% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Dent 9 81.82% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

34Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 41: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During October 2019

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Howell 14 36.84% 13 34.21% 7 18.42% 4 10.53% 38

Iron 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Jefferson 11 37.93% 14 48.28% 4 13.79% 0 0.00% 29

Madison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Maries 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Mississippi 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5

New Madrid 8 47.06% 8 47.06% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17

Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pemiscot 9 50.00% 6 33.33% 2 11.11% 1 5.56% 18

Perry 7 58.33% 3 25.00% 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 12

Phelps 9 50.00% 6 33.33% 2 11.11% 1 5.56% 18

Pulaski 15 68.18% 4 18.18% 1 4.55% 2 9.09% 22

Reynolds 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Ripley 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Scott 6 42.86% 5 35.71% 1 7.14% 2 14.29% 14

Shannon 5 50.00% 4 40.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 10

St Francois 21 65.63% 9 28.13% 1 3.13% 1 3.13% 32

Ste Genevieve 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Stoddard 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Texas 8 72.73% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 11

Washington 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Wayne 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

* Region Total * 209 50.98% 139 33.90% 36 8.78% 26 6.34% 410

Southwest Barry 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 8

Barton 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Bates 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8

Benton 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Camden 6 46.15% 4 30.77% 2 15.39% 1 7.69% 13

Cedar 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Christian 10 76.92% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13

Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dallas 1 14.29% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 7

Douglas 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5

Greene 64 64.00% 20 20.00% 9 9.00% 7 7.00% 100

Henry 5 38.46% 5 38.46% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 13

Hickory 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Jasper 38 45.78% 30 36.15% 9 10.84% 6 7.23% 83

Laclede 8 47.06% 5 29.41% 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 17

Lawrence 9 52.94% 5 29.41% 1 5.88% 2 11.77% 17

McDonald 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Miller 4 23.53% 11 64.71% 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 17

Moniteau 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Morgan 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8

Newton 7 63.64% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6

St Clair 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Stone 3 33.33% 1 11.11% 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 9

Taney 12 41.38% 6 20.69% 2 6.90% 9 31.03% 29

Vernon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Webster 6 54.55% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Wright 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

* Region Total * 210 51.35% 122 29.83% 41 10.02% 36 8.80% 409

Kansas City Jackson 60 65.93% 24 26.37% 0 0.00% 7 7.69% 91

* Region Total * 60 65.93% 24 26.37% 0 0.00% 7 7.69% 91

St. Louis St Louis City 31 67.39% 12 26.09% 2 4.35% 1 2.17% 46

St Louis County 13 40.63% 6 18.75% 2 6.25% 11 34.38% 32

* Region Total * 44 56.41% 18 23.08% 4 5.13% 12 15.39% 78

State Total 758 55.82% 391 28.79% 109 8.03% 100 7.36% 1,358

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

35Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 42: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Note: FCS cases with associated AC functions opened were automatically closed March 1, 2017 due to a policy change.

1,500

2,500

3,500

4,500

5,500

6,500

7,500

8,500

9,500

10,500

11,500

Oct

-15

Dec-

15

Feb-1

6

Apr-

16

Jun-1

6

Aug-1

6

Oct

-16

Dec-

16

Feb-1

7

Apr-

17

Jun-1

7

Aug-1

7

Oct

-17

Dec-

17

Feb-1

8

Apr-

18

Jun-1

8

Aug-1

8

Oct

-18

Dec-

18

Feb-1

9

Apr-

19

Jun-1

9

Aug-1

9

Oct

-19

Figure 9.

FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month

October 2015 Through October 2019

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 10.

Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active

as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months ApartOctober 2018 and October 2019

36Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 43: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 11.

FCS Cases Opened During October 2019

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered

Newborn Crisis Assessment Family Assessment AC Closed/FCS Reopen

Court Ordered2%

Preponderance of Evidence

3%Newborn Crisis

Assessment6%

Family Assessment66%

AC Closed/FCS Reopen3%

Preventive Services20%

Figure 12.

FCS Cases Opened During October 2019

by Reason for Opening

37Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 44: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 13.

FCS Cases Closed During October 2019

by Reason for Closing

Goal Achieved Other Reason

0 to 3 Months45%

4 to 7 Months26%

8 to 11 Months11%

12+ Months18%

Figure 14.

FCS Cases Active During October 2019

With Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open

38Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 45: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0 to 3 Months56%4 to 7 Months

29%

8 to 11 Months8%

12+ Months7%

Figure 15.

FCS Cases Active During October 2019

With No Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open

39Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 46: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures

Table 9.

Counts of persons are unduplicated.

Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.

Table 11.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;

all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;

services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources;

no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;

client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource;

other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;

family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Table 12.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Figure 9.

On March 1, 2017, memorandum CD17-16 was issued and informed staff they will no longer

open FCS functions on families when children are placed in alternative care. When the change

was implemented on March 1, 2017, all FCS cases with associated AC functions opened wereautomatically closed. The closure of the FCS cases associated with AC functions explains the

large decline in the number of FCS cases.

Page 47: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis

Figure 13.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;

all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;

services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and

family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;

client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource;

other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;

family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made;

resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Figure 14.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Page 48: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State
Page 49: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Out-of-Home Placement

Page 50: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During October 2019

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.10 2.00

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cass 0 1 3 2 0 6 0.23 7.50

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Gentry 0 0 2 0 0 2 1.21 12.50

Grundy 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.81 1.50

Harrison 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.35 9.33

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lafayette 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.37 4.00

Linn 0 1 1 0 2 4 1.27 4.25

Livingston 0 3 1 0 0 4 1.20 1.25

Mercer 0 0 3 0 0 3 3.12 2.00

Nodaway 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.70 0.67

Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Platte 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.05 13.00

Putnam 0 0 2 0 0 2 1.72 2.50

Ray 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.34 8.50

Saline 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.19 0.00

Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.62 13.00

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 10 25 2 2 39 0.18 5.00

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Audrain 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.31 6.50

Boone 0 2 5 4 0 11 0.32 6.36

Callaway 0 7 3 0 1 11 1.10 7.00

Clark 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.58 2.00

Cole 0 1 2 2 1 6 0.33 6.00

Franklin 0 0 16 0 2 18 0.72 6.67

Gasconade 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.30 15.00

Howard 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.46 16.00

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.14 14.50

Macon 0 5 4 1 0 10 2.65 4.90

Marion 0 3 1 0 0 4 0.58 6.50

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.70 1.50

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Randolph 0 2 4 0 1 7 1.19 9.29

Schuyler 0 0 4 0 0 4 3.51 5.50

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shelby 0 1 3 0 1 5 3.13 7.20

St Charles 0 2 4 0 0 6 0.06 3.83

Warren 0 1 6 0 0 7 0.86 5.86

* Region Total * 0 26 57 9 6 98 0.38 6.56

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.03 5.33

Butler 0 3 6 1 2 12 1.20 4.83

Cape Girardeau 0 0 7 1 0 8 0.48 8.38

Carter 0 0 0 4 0 4 2.64 9.00

44Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 51: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During October 2019

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.17 0.00

Dent 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.55 4.00

Dunklin 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.12 1.00

Howell 0 4 0 0 0 4 0.40 4.75

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jefferson 0 3 14 0 3 20 0.36 5.50

Madison 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.34 0.00

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.63 2.00

New Madrid 0 0 12 0 0 12 2.66 9.75

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pemiscot 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.60 1.00

Perry 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.21 2.00

Phelps 0 6 5 2 0 13 1.33 6.46

Pulaski 0 0 2 1 0 3 0.24 9.00

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ripley 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.30 8.00

Scott 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.41 4.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 6 16 0 1 23 1.60 5.17

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stoddard 0 3 4 0 0 7 1.02 10.71

Texas 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.70 2.50

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Wayne 0 0 7 0 0 7 2.49 7.43

* Region Total * 0 30 91 9 6 136 0.62 6.12

Southwest Barry 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.12 16.00

Barton 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.31 16.00

Bates 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.71 4.00

Benton 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.87 5.00

Camden 0 4 0 1 0 5 0.60 6.40

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Christian 0 3 0 1 0 4 0.19 6.75

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.72 3.67

Douglas 0 0 0 0 2 2 0.65 15.00

Greene 0 4 26 2 1 33 0.57 8.09

Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jasper 0 4 11 7 1 23 0.76 4.09

Laclede 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.34 5.00

Lawrence 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.20 13.00

McDonald 0 7 5 0 0 12 1.85 9.58

Miller 0 1 6 0 0 7 1.14 5.43

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Newton 0 2 12 0 0 14 0.95 6.93

Ozark 0 2 0 0 0 2 1.03 7.50

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Clair 0 4 0 0 0 4 2.04 5.50

Stone 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 3.00

Taney 0 4 6 4 1 15 1.31 6.73

Vernon 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.19 15.00

Webster 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.30 1.33

Wright 0 4 1 0 0 5 1.03 4.60

* Region Total * 0 47 77 18 5 147 0.56 6.76

Kansas City Jackson 0 13 24 1 5 43 0.26 4.86

* Region Total * 0 13 24 1 5 43 0.26 4.86

St. Louis St Louis City 0 13 6 0 4 23 0.34 7.35

St Louis County 0 9 22 2 6 39 0.17 4.05

* Region Total * 0 22 28 2 10 62 0.21 5.27

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

State Total 0 148 302 41 34 525 0.37 6.10

45Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 52: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During October 2019

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 3 0 0 0 3 0.14 10.33

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cass 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.30 11.67

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Nodaway 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.23 16.00

Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 4 3 0 0 7 0.03 11.71

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Boone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Franklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.07 15.00

Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Marion 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.15 16.00

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Charles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.01 15.50

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Butler 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.30 12.00

Cape Girardeau 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.18 9.00

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

46Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 53: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During October 2019

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.83 10.20

Dent 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.27 9.00

Dunklin 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.25 12.00

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jefferson 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.05 14.67

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.41 12.00

Pemiscot 0 0 4 0 2 6 1.19 12.00

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Phelps 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.31 10.00

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ripley 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.60 13.50

Scott 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 7.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.28 14.75

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stoddard 0 1 5 1 0 7 1.02 6.14

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 7 28 4 2 41 0.19 10.76

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.23 12.00

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Douglas 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.98 11.00

Greene 0 0 4 1 0 5 0.09 9.20

Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jasper 0 0 4 0 1 5 0.17 14.00

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

McDonald 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.15 15.00

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Newton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stone 0 0 1 0 1 2 0.33 12.00

Taney 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.09 13.00

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Webster 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.20 2.50

Wright 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.41 7.50

* Region Total * 0 2 14 3 4 23 0.09 10.65

Kansas City Jackson 0 2 11 1 1 15 0.09 11.13

* Region Total * 0 2 11 1 1 15 0.09 11.13

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.03 15.00

St Louis County 0 1 0 3 1 5 0.02 14.40

* Region Total * 0 1 0 4 2 7 0.02 14.57

State Total 0 16 57 12 10 95 0.07 11.24

47Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 54: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

October 2017 Through September 2019

Total

Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries

Oct-2017 519 91 610

Nov-2017 465 85 550

Dec-2017 466 81 547

Jan-2018 507 100 607

Feb-2018 453 112 565

Mar-2018 547 115 662

Apr-2018 542 103 645

May-2018 498 103 601

Jun-2018 480 74 554

Jul-2018 404 73 477

Aug-2018 557 118 675

Sep-2018 487 83 570

Oct-2018 489 78 567

Nov-2018 428 78 506

Dec-2018 451 82 533

Jan-2019 498 98 596

Feb-2019 396 92 488

Mar-2019 456 86 542

Apr-2019 624 85 709

May-2019 493 100 593

Jun-2019 410 88 498

Jul-2019 475 92 567

Aug-2019 583 133 716

Sep-2019 550 112 662

Total 11,778 2,262 14,040

48Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 55: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 17.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2019

by Length of Stay and Region

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest 10 21.74% 9 19.57% 27 58.70% 46 28.04 10.24

Northeast 14 31.82% 10 22.73% 20 45.46% 44 25.75 9.07

Southeast 36 43.90% 25 30.49% 21 25.61% 82 19.82 7.71

Southwest 27 34.62% 35 44.87% 16 20.51% 78 21.85 8.46

Kansas City 12 36.36% 12 36.36% 9 27.27% 33 18.18 10.36

St. Louis 8 22.86% 3 8.57% 24 68.57% 35 46.83 10.66

Other 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00

State Total 107 33.65% 94 29.56% 117 36.79% 318 25.13 9.05

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

49Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 56: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 6 16.33 3.83

Buchanan 56 51.38% 32 29.36% 21 19.27% 109 14.77 7.75

Caldwell 2 20.00% 6 60.00% 2 20.00% 10 17.10 6.30

Carroll 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 4.50 12.00

Cass 69 35.94% 52 27.08% 71 36.98% 192 23.58 10.53

Chariton 4 21.05% 2 10.53% 13 68.42% 19 44.63 15.00

Clay 49 37.69% 26 20.00% 55 42.31% 130 22.45 7.61

Clinton 16 29.63% 16 29.63% 22 40.74% 54 28.76 8.31

Cooper 4 30.77% 2 15.39% 7 53.85% 13 23.00 11.15

Daviess 13 68.42% 2 10.53% 4 21.05% 19 22.74 7.74

De Kalb 11 32.35% 16 47.06% 7 20.59% 34 18.09 7.24

Gentry 10 45.46% 6 27.27% 6 27.27% 22 15.55 6.95

Grundy 14 36.84% 15 39.47% 9 23.68% 38 16.74 5.61

Harrison 11 34.38% 11 34.38% 10 31.25% 32 17.50 8.66

Holt 10 43.48% 2 8.70% 11 47.83% 23 19.09 8.00

Johnson 53 47.75% 37 33.33% 21 18.92% 111 18.13 8.04

Lafayette 31 62.00% 6 12.00% 13 26.00% 50 16.40 7.88

Linn 28 35.00% 19 23.75% 33 41.25% 80 25.01 9.75

Livingston 18 33.33% 25 46.30% 11 20.37% 54 22.46 7.41

Mercer 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5 13.40 5.20

Nodaway 15 31.92% 14 29.79% 18 38.30% 47 25.77 8.34

Pettis 25 26.60% 27 28.72% 42 44.68% 94 26.50 9.29

Platte 17 39.54% 13 30.23% 13 30.23% 43 21.02 10.09

Putnam 15 62.50% 1 4.17% 8 33.33% 24 19.25 9.96

Ray 8 50.00% 6 37.50% 2 12.50% 16 14.31 8.88

Saline 20 46.51% 5 11.63% 18 41.86% 43 23.23 6.19

Sullivan 12 38.71% 8 25.81% 11 35.48% 31 19.87 9.29

Worth 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 4 24.25 13.25

* Region Total * 525 40.11% 350 26.74% 434 33.16% 1,309 21.54 8.63

Northeast Adair 53 50.48% 25 23.81% 27 25.71% 105 18.61 8.03

Audrain 16 30.19% 11 20.76% 26 49.06% 53 25.15 8.34

Boone 132 38.48% 109 31.78% 102 29.74% 343 22.43 9.52

Callaway 61 44.20% 46 33.33% 31 22.46% 138 19.41 8.62

Clark 23 53.49% 9 20.93% 11 25.58% 43 22.12 7.88

Cole 61 38.37% 72 45.28% 26 16.35% 159 16.60 8.44

Franklin 110 34.81% 98 31.01% 108 34.18% 316 24.72 8.21

Gasconade 14 48.28% 8 27.59% 7 24.14% 29 15.90 8.38

Howard 21 48.84% 10 23.26% 12 27.91% 43 17.33 10.70

Knox 7 58.33% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 12 8.67 8.92

Lewis 7 31.82% 10 45.46% 5 22.73% 22 22.32 10.27

Lincoln 62 40.26% 45 29.22% 47 30.52% 154 19.77 9.03

Macon 46 53.49% 28 32.56% 12 13.95% 86 13.13 8.33

Marion 63 30.29% 75 36.06% 70 33.65% 208 24.45 8.87

Monroe 11 37.93% 14 48.28% 4 13.79% 29 14.28 8.17

Montgomery 10 23.81% 11 26.19% 21 50.00% 42 29.62 8.57

Osage 4 33.33% 2 16.67% 6 50.00% 12 19.00 7.00

Pike 13 46.43% 5 17.86% 10 35.71% 28 21.75 8.89

Ralls 11 52.38% 4 19.05% 6 28.57% 21 22.38 9.14

Randolph 77 57.04% 34 25.19% 24 17.78% 135 14.16 9.63

Schuyler 10 58.82% 4 23.53% 3 17.65% 17 13.00 8.24

Scotland 14 58.33% 4 16.67% 6 25.00% 24 22.04 9.38

Shelby 21 53.85% 5 12.82% 13 33.33% 39 17.56 8.90

St Charles 91 34.47% 74 28.03% 99 37.50% 264 26.75 9.72

Warren 34 40.48% 22 26.19% 28 33.33% 84 18.77 8.45

* Region Total * 972 40.40% 730 30.34% 704 29.26% 2,406 21.23 8.90

Southeast Bollinger 41 59.42% 15 21.74% 13 18.84% 69 13.38 7.61

Butler 121 49.19% 57 23.17% 68 27.64% 246 20.09 8.02

Cape Girardeau 107 46.12% 74 31.90% 51 21.98% 232 17.46 8.52

Carter 12 70.59% 4 23.53% 1 5.88% 17 9.00 6.59

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

50Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 57: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Southeast Crawford 68 58.62% 32 27.59% 16 13.79% 116 13.97 8.62

Dent 19 32.76% 13 22.41% 26 44.83% 58 25.05 9.24

Dunklin 71 62.28% 20 17.54% 23 20.18% 114 16.61 8.08

Howell 50 46.30% 33 30.56% 25 23.15% 108 19.39 8.94

Iron 13 32.50% 22 55.00% 5 12.50% 40 16.68 7.05

Jefferson 255 38.52% 225 33.99% 182 27.49% 662 18.90 8.01

Madison 23 44.23% 14 26.92% 15 28.85% 52 21.50 8.38

Maries 10 58.82% 5 29.41% 2 11.77% 17 11.53 11.35

Mississippi 21 44.68% 19 40.43% 7 14.89% 47 15.40 8.38

New Madrid 72 48.00% 36 24.00% 42 28.00% 150 18.21 8.59

Oregon 27 45.00% 22 36.67% 11 18.33% 60 17.73 9.12

Pemiscot 57 51.82% 16 14.55% 37 33.64% 110 22.95 9.69

Perry 31 64.58% 12 25.00% 5 10.42% 48 11.54 7.17

Phelps 117 52.23% 46 20.54% 61 27.23% 224 16.83 9.04

Pulaski 53 33.13% 50 31.25% 57 35.63% 160 21.28 8.54

Reynolds 12 40.00% 8 26.67% 10 33.33% 30 21.77 7.63

Ripley 21 40.39% 10 19.23% 21 40.39% 52 26.92 9.81

Scott 64 48.49% 38 28.79% 30 22.73% 132 16.84 7.84

Shannon 14 40.00% 11 31.43% 10 28.57% 35 18.63 9.00

St Francois 150 48.54% 69 22.33% 90 29.13% 309 18.20 7.83

Ste Genevieve 20 32.79% 16 26.23% 25 40.98% 61 23.48 10.07

Stoddard 117 74.05% 23 14.56% 18 11.39% 158 11.55 8.32

Texas 32 41.56% 20 25.97% 25 32.47% 77 16.71 7.42

Washington 52 30.95% 58 34.52% 58 34.52% 168 24.24 9.10

Wayne 33 50.00% 13 19.70% 20 30.30% 66 18.88 9.38

* Region Total * 1,683 46.52% 981 27.11% 954 26.37% 3,618 18.47 8.41

Southwest Barry 43 27.74% 70 45.16% 42 27.10% 155 21.50 8.68

Barton 4 19.05% 1 4.76% 16 76.19% 21 39.24 11.43

Bates 15 48.39% 7 22.58% 9 29.03% 31 19.65 9.10

Benton 7 35.00% 8 40.00% 5 25.00% 20 19.10 9.25

Camden 49 44.95% 30 27.52% 30 27.52% 109 17.89 8.45

Cedar 8 28.57% 12 42.86% 8 28.57% 28 18.75 11.32

Christian 52 37.68% 68 49.28% 18 13.04% 138 17.46 8.57

Dade 6 75.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8 11.38 9.63

Dallas 16 39.02% 13 31.71% 12 29.27% 41 25.20 8.12

Douglas 23 65.71% 5 14.29% 7 20.00% 35 13.14 8.97

Greene 316 47.09% 210 31.30% 145 21.61% 671 20.18 8.09

Henry 28 40.00% 19 27.14% 23 32.86% 70 24.49 8.96

Hickory 6 46.15% 3 23.08% 4 30.77% 13 24.38 4.92

Jasper 255 52.80% 102 21.12% 126 26.09% 483 18.85 9.19

Laclede 38 26.76% 53 37.32% 51 35.92% 142 23.08 8.31

Lawrence 56 33.53% 40 23.95% 71 42.52% 167 24.97 9.28

McDonald 51 56.04% 24 26.37% 16 17.58% 91 13.45 10.15

Miller 26 41.27% 12 19.05% 25 39.68% 63 24.70 7.95

Moniteau 12 66.67% 5 27.78% 1 5.56% 18 9.22 11.28

Morgan 38 62.30% 10 16.39% 13 21.31% 61 16.75 7.74

Newton 75 59.52% 29 23.02% 22 17.46% 126 15.68 8.79

Ozark 10 45.46% 6 27.27% 6 27.27% 22 16.41 10.64

Polk 22 39.29% 17 30.36% 17 30.36% 56 21.63 9.02

St Clair 16 76.19% 1 4.76% 4 19.05% 21 12.24 10.76

Stone 33 34.38% 36 37.50% 27 28.13% 96 21.42 8.84

Taney 122 43.42% 74 26.34% 85 30.25% 281 19.55 8.07

Vernon 13 44.83% 5 17.24% 11 37.93% 29 26.93 11.31

Webster 46 62.16% 16 21.62% 12 16.22% 74 14.23 8.27

Wright 61 57.01% 28 26.17% 18 16.82% 107 14.94 8.07

* Region Total * 1,447 45.55% 905 28.49% 825 25.97% 3,177 19.67 8.68

Kansas City Jackson 654 38.25% 503 29.42% 553 32.34% 1,710 22.07 8.32

* Region Total * 654 38.25% 503 29.42% 553 32.34% 1,710 22.07 8.32

St. Louis St Louis City 220 34.48% 158 24.77% 260 40.75% 638 27.93 8.52

St Louis County 368 34.04% 336 31.08% 377 34.88% 1,081 23.18 7.92

* Region Total * 588 34.21% 494 28.74% 637 37.06% 1,719 24.94 8.14

Other Icama 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 6 28.67 10.67

* Region Total * 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 6 28.67 10.67

State Total 5,871 42.10% 3,965 28.43% 4,109 29.47% 13,945 20.75 8.53

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

51Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 58: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 6 0 0 6 5.08 3.83

Buchanan 0 56 33 17 3 109 5.20 7.75

Caldwell 0 2 8 0 0 10 4.16 6.30

Carroll 0 2 3 1 0 6 2.74 12.00

Cass 0 60 77 38 17 192 7.28 10.53

Chariton 0 5 4 8 2 19 10.74 15.00

Clay 1 36 70 16 7 130 2.27 7.61

Clinton 0 17 28 8 1 54 10.60 8.31

Cooper 0 4 4 4 1 13 3.27 11.15

Daviess 0 9 8 0 2 19 8.44 7.74

De Kalb 0 20 14 0 0 34 14.72 7.24

Gentry 0 4 17 1 0 22 13.30 6.95

Grundy 0 9 29 0 0 38 15.40 5.61

Harrison 0 9 20 3 0 32 14.41 8.66

Holt 0 2 17 4 0 23 23.69 8.00

Johnson 0 30 57 14 10 111 9.22 8.04

Lafayette 0 18 25 6 1 50 6.11 7.88

Linn 1 33 26 12 8 80 25.35 9.75

Livingston 0 14 33 5 2 54 16.22 7.41

Mercer 0 0 4 0 1 5 5.19 5.20

Nodaway 0 14 27 3 3 47 11.03 8.34

Pettis 0 39 37 12 6 94 8.72 9.29

Platte 0 16 14 9 4 43 1.95 10.09

Putnam 0 7 14 0 3 24 20.69 9.96

Ray 0 5 10 1 0 16 2.73 8.88

Saline 0 16 24 2 1 43 7.97 6.19

Sullivan 0 7 15 6 3 31 19.08 9.29

Worth 0 2 1 0 1 4 9.01 13.25

* Region Total * 2 436 625 170 76 1,309 6.05 8.63

Northeast Adair 0 30 54 16 5 105 21.12 8.03

Audrain 0 25 21 4 3 53 8.32 8.34

Boone 0 88 188 50 17 343 10.01 9.52

Callaway 0 41 76 14 7 138 13.80 8.62

Clark 0 7 31 4 1 43 25.04 7.88

Cole 0 44 73 32 10 159 8.86 8.44

Franklin 0 106 160 21 29 316 12.59 8.21

Gasconade 0 11 14 3 1 29 8.62 8.38

Howard 0 10 24 4 5 43 19.74 10.70

Knox 0 5 6 1 0 12 11.63 8.92

Lewis 0 5 13 2 2 22 9.19 10.27

Lincoln 0 47 90 9 8 154 10.46 9.03

Macon 2 38 27 16 3 86 22.76 8.33

Marion 2 75 98 22 11 208 30.20 8.87

Monroe 0 10 13 6 0 29 14.07 8.17

Montgomery 0 15 19 3 5 42 14.72 8.57

Osage 0 2 10 0 0 12 3.50 7.00

Pike 0 10 12 4 2 28 6.82 8.89

Ralls 0 13 7 1 0 21 8.83 9.14

Randolph 0 40 67 21 7 135 22.96 9.63

Schuyler 0 0 15 2 0 17 14.91 8.24

Scotland 0 4 14 5 1 24 17.62 9.38

Shelby 0 7 21 6 5 39 24.42 8.90

St Charles 4 79 138 20 23 264 2.84 9.72

Warren 0 27 46 8 3 84 10.34 8.45

* Region Total * 8 739 1,237 274 148 2,406 9.24 8.90

Southeast Bollinger 0 9 55 1 4 69 23.65 7.61

Butler 1 65 131 34 15 246 24.67 8.02

Cape Girardeau 0 68 124 25 15 232 13.98 8.52

Carter 0 4 6 7 0 17 11.22 6.59

52Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis Unit

Page 59: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 39 52 21 4 116 19.33 8.62

Dent 0 20 21 8 9 58 15.88 9.24

Dunklin 0 31 61 12 10 114 14.10 8.08

Howell 0 40 41 10 17 108 10.73 8.94

Iron 0 10 25 4 1 40 16.65 7.05

Jefferson 0 178 424 38 22 662 12.04 8.01

Madison 1 10 31 8 2 52 17.74 8.38

Maries 0 8 9 0 0 17 7.89 11.35

Mississippi 0 14 26 7 0 47 14.74 8.38

New Madrid 0 22 110 15 3 150 33.23 8.59

Oregon 0 27 22 7 4 60 24.73 9.12

Pemiscot 0 16 66 17 11 110 21.85 9.69

Perry 0 4 36 8 0 48 10.08 7.17

Phelps 0 80 100 38 6 224 22.88 9.04

Pulaski 0 55 70 31 4 160 12.76 8.54

Reynolds 0 3 22 2 3 30 19.58 7.63

Ripley 0 13 27 5 7 52 15.72 9.81

Scott 0 19 99 11 3 132 13.40 7.84

Shannon 1 16 12 4 2 35 17.76 9.00

St Francois 3 98 159 37 12 309 21.45 7.84

Ste Genevieve 0 12 27 14 8 61 14.45 10.07

Stoddard 0 32 94 26 6 158 23.13 8.32

Texas 0 16 51 9 1 77 13.46 7.42

Washington 3 32 105 21 7 168 27.71 9.10

Wayne 0 19 36 9 2 66 23.52 9.38

* Region Total * 9 960 2,042 429 178 3,618 16.43 8.41

Southwest Barry 0 70 60 17 8 155 17.94 8.68

Barton 0 7 8 2 4 21 6.53 11.43

Bates 0 12 15 1 3 31 7.29 9.10

Benton 0 6 6 5 3 20 5.82 9.25

Camden 0 44 55 8 2 109 12.99 8.45

Cedar 0 7 15 3 3 28 8.46 11.32

Christian 0 42 70 18 8 138 6.51 8.57

Dade 0 3 5 0 0 8 4.48 9.63

Dallas 0 15 16 5 5 41 9.83 8.12

Douglas 0 5 25 3 2 35 11.43 8.97

Greene 4 257 292 70 48 671 11.50 8.09

Henry 0 37 21 7 5 70 14.12 8.96

Hickory 0 4 8 1 0 13 7.81 4.92

Jasper 2 132 233 79 37 483 15.95 9.19

Laclede 0 45 77 12 8 142 15.94 8.31

Lawrence 0 60 67 28 12 167 16.41 9.28

McDonald 0 31 49 7 4 91 14.05 10.15

Miller 0 15 36 10 2 63 10.25 7.95

Moniteau 0 3 12 3 0 18 4.58 11.28

Morgan 0 29 26 4 2 61 13.45 7.74

Newton 0 59 51 10 6 126 8.54 8.79

Ozark 0 8 7 5 2 22 11.29 10.64

Polk 0 24 24 4 4 56 7.31 9.02

St Clair 0 10 8 2 1 21 10.71 10.76

Stone 0 30 50 10 6 96 15.92 8.84

Taney 0 145 99 24 13 281 24.59 8.07

Vernon 0 8 11 7 3 29 5.51 11.31

Webster 0 27 25 17 5 74 7.37 8.27

Wright 4 41 52 7 3 107 21.96 8.07

* Region Total * 10 1,176 1,423 369 199 3,177 12.18 8.68

Kansas City Jackson 14 630 803 131 132 1,710 10.32 8.32

* Region Total * 14 630 803 131 132 1,710 10.32 8.32

St. Louis St Louis City 2 238 271 80 47 638 9.45 8.52

St Louis County 8 376 526 110 61 1,081 4.62 7.92

* Region Total * 10 614 797 190 108 1,719 5.70 8.14

Other Icama 0 3 1 0 2 6 0.00 10.67

* Region Total * 0 3 1 0 2 6 0.00 10.67

State Total 53 4,558 6,928 1,563 843 13,945 9.78 8.53

53Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis Unit

Page 60: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0

Chariton 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

Clinton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 0 0 26 11 2 1 0 0

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 0 0 0 16 2 0 0 0 0

Callaway 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0

Franklin 0 0 0 11 5 1 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

Marion 1 0 1 3 4 3 0 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

St Charles 4 0 0 14 2 0 0 0 0

Warren 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 5 0 1 67 19 7 2 0 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

54Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 61: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 0 0 27 2 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Shannon 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 2 0 5 40 8 8 2 0 0

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 4 0 0 20 2 0 0 0 0

Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 2 0 0 20 7 2 0 0 0

Laclede 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0

McDonald 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Taney 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0

Wright 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 10 0 0 82 16 7 0 0 0

Kansas City Jackson 10 0 4 101 10 6 0 0 0

* Region Total * 10 0 4 101 10 6 0 0 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 2 31 4 2 0 0 0

St Louis County 2 0 2 54 3 1 4 0 0

* Region Total * 2 0 4 85 7 3 4 0 0

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 30 0 14 401 71 33 9 0 0

55Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 62: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 3 0 2 46 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 3 0 0 55 3 0 0 0

Chariton 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0

Clay 0 1 0 5 29 0 0 0 0

Clinton 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 1 0 2 5 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 3 0 0 27 3 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 2 1 2 11 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 2 2 1 27 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 3 0 0 11 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 3 0 0 34 3 0 0 0

Platte 0 2 0 0 14 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 2 1 0 11 1 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 29 4 14 363 12 0 0 0

Northeast Adair 0 1 2 0 25 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 1 2 1 20 1 0 0 0

Boone 0 3 3 1 65 3 0 0 0

Callaway 0 3 0 0 35 2 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 0 0 1 43 0 0 0 0

Franklin 0 3 5 7 80 7 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 3 2 2 40 6 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 1 0 37 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 4 7 4 57 1 0 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 1 1 1 6 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 3 0 1 8 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 1 0 0 34 1 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 1 0 6 2 0 0 0

St Charles 0 7 0 1 57 8 0 0 0

Warren 0 0 2 3 19 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 31 26 24 591 35 0 0 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 0 64 1 0 1 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0 1 6 60 2 0 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

56Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 63: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 39 1 0 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 7 0 24 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 2 0 0 38 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 9 6 2 134 6 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 1 9 1 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 3 0 0 18 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 1 0 2 24 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 14 3 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 2 5 0 72 1 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 1 0 3 51 1 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 2 2 6 88 4 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 11 3 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 9 5 16 1 0 0 0

Texas 0 2 0 0 14 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 1 2 1 27 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 24 32 27 837 25 0 1 0

Southwest Barry 0 8 0 4 56 1 0 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 0

Bates 0 1 0 1 10 1 0 0 0

Benton 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 1 0 0 43 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 4 0 2 30 2 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 2 0 0 12 1 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0

Greene 0 23 1 19 194 10 0 0 0

Henry 0 4 1 1 31 3 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 8 0 10 94 4 0 0 0

Laclede 0 1 0 1 37 3 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 2 0 5 47 2 0 0 0

McDonald 0 2 0 1 27 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 1 0 1 13 1 0 0 1

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 1 0 1 25 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 2 0 1 53 0 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 2 0 0 22 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 5 0 3 22 0 0 0 0

Taney 0 10 0 12 113 4 0 0 0

Vernon 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0

Webster 0 1 0 4 20 1 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 2 38 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 83 6 71 934 37 0 0 1

Kansas City Jackson 0 49 15 56 409 28 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 49 15 56 409 28 0 0 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 23 7 22 155 11 0 0 0

St Louis County 0 28 8 36 250 8 0 0 1

* Region Total * 0 51 15 58 405 19 0 0 1

Other Icama 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

State Total 0 267 98 251 3,541 156 0 1 2

57Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 64: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 3

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 0

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 3 0 0 0 7 23 8 2 5

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Boone 1 0 0 0 1 5 3 1 0

Callaway 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 8 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Cole 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 1

Franklin 0 0 0 1 4 7 4 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 1 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0

Marion 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 5 1

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 0

St Charles 2 0 0 0 1 4 5 1 0

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

* Region Total * 4 0 0 6 13 32 27 23 3

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0

Butler 3 0 0 2 1 5 1 2 1

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 1

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

58Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 65: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0

Howell 0 0 1 3 2 10 2 1 2

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Jefferson 2 1 0 1 1 5 0 0 1

Madison 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0

St Francois 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0

Texas 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

* Region Total * 6 1 1 13 11 69 10 6 8

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0

Douglas 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Greene 2 0 0 0 2 14 9 2 4

Henry 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 1 0 0 1 2 11 3 5 3

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 1 1

McDonald 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0

Miller 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0

Taney 1 0 0 1 1 5 1 0 0

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 0

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

* Region Total * 7 0 0 7 14 64 22 20 12

Kansas City Jackson 0 3 0 4 4 32 8 3 16

* Region Total * 0 3 0 4 4 32 8 3 16

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 6 2 1 0 0 4

St Louis County 2 0 1 6 4 10 0 4 6

* Region Total * 2 0 1 12 6 11 0 4 10

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

State Total 22 4 2 42 55 232 75 58 54

59Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 66: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 1 14 0 1 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 8 19 1 0 2 0 1 0

Chariton 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 1 2 12 0 0 0 0 1 0

Clinton 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 1

Cooper 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1

Johnson 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0

Lafayette 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0

Linn 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1

Pettis 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 4 0

Platte 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 23 111 2 2 2 0 10 3

Northeast Adair 1 0 12 1 0 0 0 1 0

Audrain 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0

Boone 3 4 21 4 13 0 0 0 3

Callaway 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3

Clark 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 3 3 17 1 5 0 0 0 0

Franklin 0 2 14 0 5 0 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Lewis 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

Lincoln 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0

Macon 0 1 10 1 0 0 0 1 0

Marion 0 2 18 0 1 1 0 0 2

Monroe 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 1 3 9 0 2 0 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

Shelby 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

St Charles 0 3 10 1 4 0 0 0 1

Warren 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 1

* Region Total * 10 27 146 9 36 1 0 7 10

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 13 13 0 1 0 0 2 1

Cape Girardeau 0 15 5 3 0 0 0 0 0

Carter 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0

60Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 67: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB

Southeast Crawford 0 5 3 4 7 0 0 1 0

Dent 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 5 5 0 2 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 6 19 0 11 0 0 0 5

Madison 0 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 5 6 0 2 0 0 1 1

Oregon 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 5 9 1 0 0 0 0 0

Perry 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 2 0

Phelps 0 9 17 3 6 0 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 1 13 1 8 0 0 4 0

Reynolds 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 21 9 0 2 0 0 3 0

Ste Genevieve 0 8 4 1 1 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 10 8 0 2 0 0 4 0

Texas 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 10 8 1 0 1 0 1 0

Wayne 0 5 2 1 1 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 143 157 25 52 1 0 18 7

Southwest Barry 2 3 9 1 1 0 0 0 0

Barton 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 0

Cedar 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 3 7 2 5 0 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

Douglas 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 0 12 26 5 15 0 2 1 7

Henry 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 12 34 2 13 0 5 2 0

Laclede 0 1 4 1 5 0 0 0 1

Lawrence 0 3 16 2 1 0 0 1 0

McDonald 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0

Miller 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ozark 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 2 5 0 2 0 0 1 1

Taney 2 5 5 3 7 0 1 0 2

Vernon 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 5 61 161 22 54 0 8 7 11

Kansas City Jackson 1 19 60 4 12 2 1 2 11

* Region Total * 1 19 60 4 12 2 1 2 11

St. Louis St Louis City 1 5 37 3 26 0 0 0 6

St Louis County 3 9 59 1 23 2 0 0 7

* Region Total * 4 14 96 4 49 2 0 0 13

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 21 287 731 66 205 8 9 44 55

61Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 68: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 6

Buchanan 0 25 8 1 0 0 0 0 109

Caldwell 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

Carroll 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6

Cass 1 55 21 1 1 1 3 4 192

Chariton 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 19

Clay 5 54 11 0 0 0 0 0 130

Clinton 0 25 2 0 0 0 1 0 54

Cooper 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 13

Daviess 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 19

De Kalb 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 34

Gentry 1 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 22

Grundy 0 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 38

Harrison 0 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 32

Holt 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 23

Johnson 0 31 26 3 0 0 1 0 111

Lafayette 0 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 50

Linn 0 19 7 0 0 0 1 0 80

Livingston 2 23 8 0 0 0 2 0 54

Mercer 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 5

Nodaway 0 18 8 0 0 0 0 1 47

Pettis 1 28 8 0 0 0 1 0 94

Platte 0 7 7 0 0 0 1 1 43

Putnam 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 24

Ray 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 16

Saline 5 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 43

Sullivan 1 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 31

Worth 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

* Region Total * 16 434 169 5 1 1 12 6 1,309

Northeast Adair 1 41 12 0 0 0 1 1 105

Audrain 0 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 53

Boone 4 123 57 2 0 0 4 1 343

Callaway 2 48 23 0 0 0 0 0 138

Clark 0 24 7 0 0 0 0 0 43

Cole 4 42 27 1 0 0 2 1 159

Franklin 1 105 54 0 0 0 0 0 316

Gasconade 1 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 29

Howard 0 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 43

Knox 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 12

Lewis 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 22

Lincoln 2 70 18 0 0 0 1 0 154

Macon 0 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 86

Marion 5 68 22 0 0 0 0 0 208

Monroe 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 29

Montgomery 0 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 42

Osage 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 12

Pike 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 28

Ralls 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 21

Randolph 0 38 29 0 0 0 0 0 135

Schuyler 0 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 17

Scotland 0 12 2 0 0 0 2 0 24

Shelby 0 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 39

St Charles 2 96 37 1 0 0 1 2 264

Warren 2 24 19 0 0 0 1 0 84

* Region Total * 25 826 372 4 0 0 12 5 2,406

Southeast Bollinger 0 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 69

Butler 0 77 49 1 0 0 2 2 246

Cape Girardeau 4 77 43 2 0 1 1 1 232

Carter 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 17

62Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 69: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Southeast Crawford 0 26 26 0 0 0 1 0 116

Dent 1 16 4 0 0 0 0 1 58

Dunklin 1 33 27 0 0 1 0 2 114

Howell 0 23 17 0 0 0 0 0 108

Iron 1 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 40

Jefferson 6 271 139 7 0 0 1 0 662

Madison 0 23 8 0 0 0 0 0 52

Maries 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 17

Mississippi 0 16 10 0 0 0 0 0 47

New Madrid 3 78 28 0 0 0 1 1 150

Oregon 0 11 11 0 0 0 2 1 60

Pemiscot 0 50 16 1 0 0 2 0 110

Perry 1 16 19 0 0 0 0 0 48

Phelps 0 73 27 0 0 0 2 1 224

Pulaski 0 57 13 0 0 0 3 1 160

Reynolds 1 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 30

Ripley 0 20 7 1 0 0 0 1 52

Scott 1 69 29 0 0 2 0 0 132

Shannon 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 35

St Francois 3 87 69 1 0 0 2 2 309

Ste Genevieve 1 20 6 0 0 0 0 1 61

Stoddard 3 49 42 0 0 1 1 2 158

Texas 0 43 7 0 0 0 1 0 77

Washington 1 68 36 0 0 0 0 0 168

Wayne 0 14 22 0 0 0 0 0 66

* Region Total * 27 1,300 699 13 0 5 19 16 3,618

Southwest Barry 1 44 15 0 0 0 0 1 155

Barton 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 21

Bates 0 4 11 0 0 0 0 1 31

Benton 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 20

Camden 1 36 18 0 0 0 0 0 109

Cedar 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 1 28

Christian 1 60 9 0 0 0 1 1 138

Dade 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 8

Dallas 0 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 41

Douglas 2 19 4 0 0 0 1 0 35

Greene 6 176 101 2 0 0 3 9 671

Henry 0 13 8 0 0 0 0 0 70

Hickory 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 13

Jasper 4 166 62 0 0 0 3 7 483

Laclede 1 68 7 1 0 0 0 1 142

Lawrence 1 45 21 1 0 0 3 1 167

McDonald 1 24 24 1 0 0 0 0 91

Miller 0 20 12 0 0 0 1 0 63

Moniteau 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 18

Morgan 0 15 11 0 0 0 0 0 61

Newton 0 22 29 0 0 0 1 1 126

Ozark 1 5 1 1 0 0 1 1 22

Polk 1 17 6 0 0 0 0 2 56

St Clair 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 21

Stone 1 34 14 0 0 0 0 0 96

Taney 1 70 25 0 0 0 1 0 281

Vernon 1 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 29

Webster 0 11 14 0 0 0 3 0 74

Wright 4 40 8 0 0 0 0 0 107

* Region Total * 28 942 434 6 0 0 19 26 3,177

Kansas City Jackson 13 384 392 28 1 0 11 11 1,710

* Region Total * 13 384 392 28 1 0 11 11 1,710

St. Louis St Louis City 3 178 84 7 0 0 4 14 638

St Louis County 15 323 177 11 0 0 3 18 1,081

* Region Total * 18 501 261 18 0 0 7 32 1,719

Other Icama 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6

* Region Total * 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6

State Total 127 4,388 2,327 75 2 6 80 96 13,945

63Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 70: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total

Home Home Home Care Other Exits

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 1 0 0 1

Caldwell 0 2 0 0 0 2

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 3 7 5 2 17

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 4 3 0 0 7

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 1 0 0 1

Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 1

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 1 0 1

Lafayette 0 1 0 0 0 1

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 1 0 1

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 4 0 0 5

Pettis 0 0 0 1 1 2

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 2 0 0 2

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 1 1

Sullivan 0 0 4 0 0 4

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 11 23 8 4 46

Northeast Adair 0 0 1 0 0 1

Audrain 0 1 2 0 1 4

Boone 0 0 1 0 1 2

Callaway 0 0 1 0 0 1

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 4 2 0 0 6

Franklin 0 8 1 0 0 9

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 1 0 1

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 1 0 0 1

Macon 0 1 0 0 1 2

Marion 0 0 1 0 0 1

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 1 1

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 5 0 3 8

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 0 1 5 0 1 7

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 15 20 1 8 44

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 0 1 1

Cape Girardeau 0 3 2 0 2 7

Carter 0 0 2 0 0 2

64Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 71: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During October 2019

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total

Home Home Home Care Other Exits

Southeast Crawford 0 0 8 2 0 10

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 6 0 0 0 6

Howell 0 1 0 0 0 1

Iron 0 2 2 0 0 4

Jefferson 0 2 4 0 0 6

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 1 0 0 1

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 2 6 0 0 8

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 3 0 0 0 3

Pulaski 0 2 1 0 0 3

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 1 0 3 0 0 4

Scott 0 0 1 0 0 1

Shannon 0 2 0 0 0 2

St Francois 0 3 3 2 0 8

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 3 8 1 0 12

Texas 0 2 0 1 0 3

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 31 41 6 3 82

Southwest Barry 0 0 1 0 0 1

Barton 0 1 3 0 0 4

Bates 0 1 1 0 1 3

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 1 0 1 0 2

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 6 2 1 0 9

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 0 5 8 1 0 14

Henry 0 0 1 1 0 2

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 6 7 2 2 17

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 1 0 0 1

McDonald 0 0 0 0 2 2

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 1 0 0 1

Ozark 0 0 3 0 0 3

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 1 0 0 0 1

Stone 0 5 2 0 1 8

Taney 0 0 6 0 0 6

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 1 1 0 0 2

Wright 0 2 0 0 0 2

* Region Total * 0 29 37 6 6 78

Kansas City Jackson 0 8 17 0 8 33

* Region Total * 0 8 17 0 8 33

St. Louis St Louis City 0 4 1 0 7 12

St Louis County 0 4 15 0 4 23

* Region Total * 0 8 16 0 11 35

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 1 102 154 21 40 318

65Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 72: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During October 2019

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved Total

Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 2 0 0 0 3 5

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 8 0 2 2 4 16

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 6 0 0 0 2 8

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 1 1

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 1 0 0 0 0 1

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 1 1

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 1 0 0 0 0 1

Lafayette 1 0 0 0 0 1

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0

Livingston 1 0 0 0 0 1

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 1 0 1 0 1 3

Platte 0 0 0 0 4 4

Putnam 2 0 0 0 0 2

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 2 2

Sullivan 4 0 0 0 0 4

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 27 0 3 2 18 50

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Audrain 2 0 0 1 4 7

Boone 1 0 0 1 1 3

Callaway 0 0 0 0 1 1

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 2 0 0 0 1 3

Franklin 2 0 0 0 0 2

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 1 0 0 4 5

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 1 0 0 0 0 1

Macon 1 1 0 0 0 2

Marion 1 0 0 0 0 1

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 4 4

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 1 0 0 0 0 1

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 5 1 0 0 9 15

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 3 0 0 1 0 4

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 19 3 0 3 24 49

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 1 5 6

Cape Girardeau 3 0 0 2 3 8

Carter 2 0 0 0 1 3

Crawford 5 0 0 0 0 5

66Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 73: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During October 2019

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved Total

Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Southeast Dent 0 0 0 0 1 1

Dunklin 6 0 0 0 0 6

Howell 1 0 0 0 2 3

Iron 1 0 0 0 11 12

Jefferson 2 0 0 0 3 5

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 2 2

Pemiscot 3 0 0 0 0 3

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 1 0 0 0 0 1

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 3 3

Ripley 3 0 0 0 0 3

Scott 0 0 0 0 1 1

Shannon 2 0 0 0 1 3

St Francois 7 0 0 0 0 7

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 11 0 0 1 5 17

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 19 19

* Region Total * 47 0 0 4 57 108

Southwest Barry 1 0 0 0 2 3

Barton 1 0 0 0 2 3

Bates 1 0 0 0 0 1

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 2 0 0 0 1 3

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 6 0 0 0 1 7

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 4 0 0 1 9 14

Henry 0 0 0 1 0 1

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 9 2 0 3 8 22

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0

McDonald 0 0 0 1 1 2

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 1 0 0 0 0 1

Ozark 3 0 0 0 0 3

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 1 0 0 0 0 1

Stone 7 0 0 1 2 10

Taney 6 0 0 0 0 6

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 0 1 1

* Region Total * 42 2 0 7 27 78

Kansas City Jackson 18 0 0 4 1 23

* Region Total * 18 0 0 4 1 23

St. Louis St Louis City 5 0 0 5 1 11

St Louis County 8 0 0 2 3 13

* Region Total * 13 0 0 7 4 24

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 71 71

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 71 71

State Total 166 5 3 27 202 403

67Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 74: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2019

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions No Identified

Legal Status 1 Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive

TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 2 0 0 0 2 2

Buchanan 20 4 0 0 24 20

Caldwell 2 0 0 2 4 2

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 7 5 0 3 15 10

Chariton 2 1 0 0 3 2

Clay 5 10 0 1 16 1

Clinton 17 1 0 0 18 4

Cooper 2 0 0 0 2 0

Daviess 3 1 0 0 4 1

De Kalb 4 7 0 0 11 1

Gentry 5 0 0 0 5 5

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 1 1 0 0 2 0

Holt 5 7 0 0 12 10

Johnson 2 0 0 0 2 0

Lafayette 8 0 0 0 8 3

Linn 10 7 0 0 17 4

Livingston 8 0 0 0 8 3

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 3 0 0 3 2

Pettis 14 3 1 0 18 2

Platte 0 4 0 0 4 3

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 1 0 0 0 1 0

Saline 6 5 0 0 11 3

Sullivan 10 0 0 0 10 3

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 134 59 1 6 200 81

Northeast Adair 10 6 0 1 17 3

Audrain 12 6 0 1 19 10

Boone 46 8 1 0 55 30

Callaway 20 2 0 0 22 11

Clark 5 1 0 0 6 1

Cole 30 2 0 0 32 20

Franklin 51 13 0 9 73 38

Gasconade 5 0 0 0 5 4

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0

Knox 4 0 0 0 4 4

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 30 13 0 1 44 17

Macon 4 1 0 0 5 0

Marion 28 6 0 0 34 16

Monroe 7 0 0 0 7 3

Montgomery 17 0 0 0 17 7

Osage 0 1 0 0 1 0

Pike 3 1 0 0 4 2

Ralls 1 1 0 0 2 1

Randolph 13 0 0 0 13 10

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 1 0 0 0 1 1

St Charles 52 26 0 2 80 28

Warren 20 3 0 0 23 7

* Region Total * 359 90 1 14 464 213

Southeast Bollinger 3 0 0 0 3 1

Butler 45 19 0 0 64 43

Cape Girardeau 11 4 0 0 15 8

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crawford 10 6 0 0 16 14

Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 68

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 75: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2019

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions No Identified

In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive

TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource

Southeast Dent 7 8 0 0 15 11

Dunklin 12 1 2 0 15 9

Howell 9 0 1 0 10 8

Iron 7 0 0 2 9 4

Jefferson 75 20 0 3 98 64

Madison 6 4 0 0 10 7

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 5 5 0 0 10 5

Oregon 4 1 0 0 5 5

Pemiscot 6 3 0 0 9 6

Perry 5 2 0 0 7 6

Phelps 9 3 0 2 14 6

Pulaski 30 3 0 3 36 16

Reynolds 5 0 0 0 5 3

Ripley 3 6 0 1 10 8

Scott 1 0 0 0 1 0

Shannon 5 1 0 0 6 3

St Francois 16 16 0 0 32 19

Ste Genevieve 7 0 0 0 7 5

Stoddard 2 1 0 0 3 2

Texas 16 0 0 2 18 8

Washington 7 8 0 0 15 7

Wayne 16 5 0 0 21 17

* Region Total * 322 116 3 13 454 285

Southwest Barry 43 5 0 0 48 23

Barton 5 1 0 1 7 6

Bates 7 0 0 2 9 1

Benton 6 0 0 0 6 6

Camden 14 2 0 0 16 12

Cedar 6 0 0 0 6 4

Christian 20 4 1 3 28 14

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 8 3 0 0 11 5

Douglas 6 1 0 0 7 1

Greene 135 82 0 6 223 83

Henry 14 1 0 1 16 3

Hickory 5 1 0 0 6 1

Jasper 76 8 8 2 94 55

Laclede 17 4 0 0 21 12

Lawrence 45 10 1 0 56 23

McDonald 12 3 0 0 15 5

Miller 3 0 0 0 3 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 1 1 1 0 3 0

Newton 13 8 1 0 22 14

Ozark 6 0 0 0 6 5

Polk 9 0 0 0 9 7

St Clair 1 0 0 0 1 0

Stone 13 9 0 0 22 3

Taney 58 17 0 0 75 33

Vernon 5 0 0 0 5 5

Webster 4 1 0 2 7 1

Wright 15 5 2 0 22 5

* Region Total * 547 166 14 17 744 327

Kansas City Jackson 301 163 8 8 480 348

* Region Total * 301 163 8 8 480 348

St. Louis St Louis City 107 26 5 1 139 86

St Louis County 158 55 0 11 224 159

* Region Total * 265 81 5 12 363 245

Other Icama 0 0 35 0 35 0

* Region Total * 0 0 35 0 35 0

State Total 1,928 675 67 70 2,740 1,499

Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 69

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 76: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of October 2019

by Vendor Type and County

Large Current Licensed

Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors

Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage

Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 14 1 0 12 14 11 27.27%

Atchison 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0.00%

Buchanan 5 0 0 44 21 0 41 56 47 19.15%

Caldwell 0 0 0 3 5 0 8 8 12 -33.33%

Carroll 0 0 0 1 3 0 3 3 1 200.00%

Cass 3 0 0 48 27 4 42 68 71 -4.23%

Chariton 0 0 0 2 5 0 6 7 8 -12.50%

Clay 2 0 0 111 71 13 121 168 138 21.74%

Clinton 1 0 0 14 5 0 13 17 25 -32.00%

Cooper 0 0 0 4 5 1 6 7 2 250.00%

Daviess 0 0 0 2 9 0 9 10 11 -9.09%

De Kalb 1 0 0 5 5 0 10 10 11 -9.09%

Gentry 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 7 11 -36.36%

Grundy 0 0 0 3 6 0 6 9 9 0.00%

Harrison 0 0 0 2 8 0 9 10 11 -9.09%

Holt 0 0 0 2 7 1 8 8 6 33.33%

Johnson 1 0 0 22 18 0 22 36 35 2.86%

Lafayette 3 0 0 14 17 1 18 27 22 22.73%

Linn 1 0 0 10 12 0 16 18 17 5.88%

Livingston 0 0 0 7 13 0 15 18 17 5.88%

Mercer 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0.00%

Nodaway 1 0 0 9 13 1 12 20 22 -9.09%

Pettis 1 0 0 16 19 1 24 30 32 -6.25%

Platte 0 0 0 26 19 2 25 43 35 22.86%

Putnam 0 0 0 4 2 0 4 6 11 -45.46%

Ray 1 0 0 5 1 0 4 5 9 -44.44%

Saline 3 0 0 6 10 3 10 12 15 -20.00%

Sullivan 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 2 4 -50.00%

Worth 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 8 -62.50%

* Region Total * 23 0 0 379 314 27 457 625 602 3.82%

Northeast Adair 3 0 0 25 20 2 33 38 39 -2.56%

Audrain 0 0 0 15 19 3 22 33 35 -5.71%

Boone 6 0 0 44 41 3 58 79 76 3.95%

Callaway 0 0 0 13 37 1 33 49 49 0.00%

Clark 0 0 0 3 13 1 14 16 9 77.78%

Cole 1 0 0 35 18 1 36 47 40 17.50%

Franklin 4 0 0 56 62 2 88 115 112 2.68%

Gasconade 0 0 0 5 9 1 13 14 9 55.56%

Howard 1 0 0 6 6 1 8 11 10 10.00%

Knox 0 0 0 2 1 1 3 3 1 200.00%

Lewis 1 0 0 6 12 5 14 16 18 -11.11%

Lincoln 2 0 0 40 36 1 60 69 53 30.19%

Macon 0 1 0 14 16 0 24 30 21 42.86%

Marion 2 0 0 25 21 0 32 40 56 -28.57%

Monroe 1 0 0 10 4 0 13 13 17 -23.53%

Montgomery 0 0 0 9 12 1 17 21 19 10.53%

Osage 0 0 0 4 5 0 8 9 7 28.57%

Pike 0 0 0 9 7 0 12 16 23 -30.44%

Ralls 0 0 0 8 17 1 23 25 22 13.64%

Randolph 4 0 0 15 21 0 26 35 39 -10.26%

Schuyler 0 0 0 1 8 0 6 8 6 33.33%

Scotland 0 0 0 3 8 0 8 8 8 0.00%

Shelby 0 0 0 5 4 0 7 8 6 33.33%

St Charles 14 0 0 93 74 6 107 153 150 2.00%

Warren 0 0 0 22 20 0 18 40 40 0.00%

* Region Total * 39 1 0 468 491 30 683 896 865 3.58%

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 2 13 0 12 15 21 -28.57%

Butler 1 0 0 39 55 2 67 89 70 27.14%

Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 43 52 0 72 94 108 -12.96%

Carter 0 0 0 6 5 0 10 11 11 0.00%

70Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 77: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of October 2019

by Vendor Type and County

Large Current Licensed

Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors

Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage

Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 10 21 1 24 31 32 -3.13%

Dent 0 0 0 9 17 0 19 25 21 19.05%

Dunklin 0 0 0 23 24 2 39 45 39 15.39%

Howell 0 0 0 23 33 0 38 55 51 7.84%

Iron 0 0 0 8 13 0 12 20 15 33.33%

Jefferson 3 0 0 57 100 1 132 155 158 -1.90%

Madison 0 0 0 6 23 0 23 29 28 3.57%

Maries 0 0 0 5 6 2 7 10 8 25.00%

Mississippi 0 0 0 6 17 0 18 23 20 15.00%

New Madrid 1 0 0 11 35 0 40 46 51 -9.80%

Oregon 0 0 0 9 4 0 10 12 10 20.00%

Pemiscot 1 0 0 13 29 0 28 40 44 -9.09%

Perry 0 0 0 9 19 0 19 28 25 12.00%

Phelps 4 0 0 27 29 2 44 55 52 5.77%

Pulaski 0 0 0 16 27 1 40 42 43 -2.33%

Reynolds 0 0 0 4 7 0 7 11 10 10.00%

Ripley 0 0 0 17 24 0 26 34 21 61.91%

Scott 0 1 0 20 46 2 47 65 49 32.65%

Shannon 1 0 0 7 3 0 7 10 13 -23.08%

St Francois 0 1 0 40 58 2 82 96 86 11.63%

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 6 9 0 13 15 19 -21.05%

Stoddard 0 0 0 20 27 0 33 44 39 12.82%

Texas 0 0 0 15 17 0 24 32 34 -5.88%

Washington 0 0 0 9 29 0 30 38 31 22.58%

Wayne 0 0 0 6 13 1 17 19 20 -5.00%

* Region Total * 12 2 0 466 755 16 940 1,189 1,129 5.31%

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 18 21 0 29 37 33 12.12%

Barton 0 0 0 16 4 0 14 18 19 -5.26%

Bates 0 0 0 17 7 0 14 23 26 -11.54%

Benton 2 0 0 9 6 0 10 15 15 0.00%

Camden 1 1 0 13 20 1 25 33 29 13.79%

Cedar 0 0 0 6 6 0 8 12 14 -14.29%

Christian 10 0 0 88 40 1 75 119 117 1.71%

Dade 1 0 0 3 3 0 4 5 5 0.00%

Dallas 0 0 0 9 7 0 7 14 21 -33.33%

Douglas 0 0 0 17 13 0 16 29 22 31.82%

Greene 13 0 0 232 80 6 166 265 278 -4.68%

Henry 1 0 0 26 12 0 25 36 48 -25.00%

Hickory 0 0 0 3 7 0 7 10 13 -23.08%

Jasper 12 0 0 82 96 5 126 160 141 13.48%

Laclede 3 0 0 33 24 0 40 51 63 -19.05%

Lawrence 2 0 0 33 28 1 44 53 59 -10.17%

McDonald 2 0 0 12 13 2 20 24 34 -29.41%

Miller 1 0 0 14 10 0 16 24 18 33.33%

Moniteau 1 0 0 10 7 0 8 17 12 41.67%

Morgan 0 0 0 7 15 2 15 21 18 16.67%

Newton 5 0 0 36 24 1 47 57 76 -25.00%

Ozark 0 0 0 1 7 1 6 7 3 133.33%

Polk 4 0 0 31 16 1 30 42 41 2.44%

St Clair 1 0 0 8 4 0 10 11 7 57.14%

Stone 5 0 0 28 20 2 28 39 35 11.43%

Taney 9 0 0 75 30 1 68 99 82 20.73%

Vernon 0 0 0 15 7 0 11 22 24 -8.33%

Webster 1 0 0 30 14 0 20 42 44 -4.55%

Wright 1 0 0 18 25 1 32 42 40 5.00%

* Region Total * 75 1 0 890 566 25 921 1,327 1,337 -0.75%

Kansas City Jackson 50 0 0 380 237 28 391 521 558 -6.63%

* Region Total * 50 0 0 380 237 28 391 521 558 -6.63%

St. Louis St Louis City 15 0 0 74 73 5 94 134 146 -8.22%

St Louis County 55 2 0 220 245 7 261 407 424 -4.01%

* Region Total * 70 2 0 294 318 12 355 541 570 -5.09%

State Total 269 6 0 2,877 2,681 138 3,747 5,099 5,061 0.75%

71Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 78: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

Total

LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Atchison 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 12

Buchanan 109 0 0 2 116 0 0 73 0 300

Caldwell 10 0 0 0 167 0 0 73 0 250

Carroll 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

Cass 192 0 0 1 291 1 1 76 0 562

Chariton 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19

Clay 130 0 0 15 467 0 0 128 0 740

Clinton 54 0 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 71

Cooper 13 0 0 0 28 0 0 11 0 52

Daviess 19 0 0 0 14 0 0 6 0 39

De Kalb 34 0 0 0 142 0 0 67 0 243

Gentry 22 0 0 0 6 0 0 10 0 38

Grundy 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38

Harrison 32 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 36

Holt 23 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 31

Johnson 111 0 0 2 137 1 1 58 0 310

Lafayette 50 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 54

Linn 80 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 84

Livingston 54 0 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 69

Mercer 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

Nodaway 47 0 0 3 32 0 0 34 0 116

Pettis 94 1 0 0 120 0 0 50 0 265

Platte 43 0 0 1 159 0 0 24 0 227

Putnam 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24

Ray 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16

Saline 43 0 0 2 150 0 3 46 0 244

Sullivan 31 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 32

Worth 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 11 0 17

* Region Total * 1,309 1 0 27 1,870 2 5 690 0 3,904

Northeast Adair 105 0 0 0 72 0 0 50 0 227

Audrain 53 0 0 1 68 1 0 49 0 172

Boone 343 1 0 6 363 0 0 262 0 975

Callaway 138 0 0 0 5 0 0 12 0 155

Clark 43 0 0 1 6 0 0 17 0 67

Cole 159 0 0 42 193 0 0 108 0 502

Franklin 316 0 0 4 398 0 0 134 0 852

Gasconade 29 0 0 0 17 0 0 4 0 50

Howard 43 0 0 1 23 0 0 19 0 86

Knox 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

Lewis 22 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 26

Lincoln 154 0 0 3 134 3 0 84 0 378

Macon 86 0 0 0 37 0 0 27 0 150

Marion 208 0 0 3 105 1 0 55 0 372

Monroe 29 0 0 0 14 0 0 10 0 53

Montgomery 42 0 0 0 19 0 0 21 0 82

Osage 12 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 22

Pike 28 0 0 0 24 0 0 13 0 65

Ralls 21 0 0 0 8 0 0 3 0 32

Randolph 135 0 0 0 88 0 0 85 0 308

Schuyler 17 0 0 0 9 0 0 4 0 30

Scotland 24 0 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 37

Shelby 39 0 0 0 28 0 0 12 0 79

St Charles 264 0 0 9 448 2 1 181 0 905

Warren 84 0 0 1 95 0 0 50 0 230

* Region Total * 2,406 1 0 71 2,164 8 1 1,216 0 5,867

Southeast Bollinger 69 0 0 0 21 0 1 16 0 107

Butler 246 0 0 0 13 2 1 4 0 266

Cape Girardeau 232 0 0 4 146 1 1 213 0 597

Carter 17 0 0 1 12 0 0 5 0 35

Crawford 116 0 0 1 25 0 0 20 0 162

72Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 79: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

Total

LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Southeast Dent 58 0 0 0 14 0 0 2 0 74

Dunklin 114 2 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 134

Howell 108 1 0 6 49 0 0 32 0 196

Iron 40 0 0 1 92 0 0 56 0 189

Jefferson 662 0 0 4 544 2 1 494 0 1,707

Madison 52 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 57

Maries 17 0 0 0 15 0 1 17 0 50

Mississippi 47 0 0 0 11 0 0 50 0 108

New Madrid 150 0 0 0 2 0 0 25 0 177

Oregon 60 0 0 0 26 0 0 5 0 91

Pemiscot 110 0 0 0 88 0 0 144 0 342

Perry 48 0 0 0 36 0 0 15 0 99

Phelps 224 0 0 0 90 0 3 76 0 393

Pulaski 160 0 0 1 254 0 1 127 0 543

Reynolds 30 0 0 0 13 0 0 11 0 54

Ripley 52 0 0 0 241 0 0 176 0 469

Scott 132 0 0 0 84 0 0 184 0 400

Shannon 35 0 0 0 31 0 0 14 0 80

St Francois 309 0 0 1 468 0 2 138 0 918

Ste Genevieve 61 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 62

Stoddard 158 0 0 1 241 0 0 249 0 649

Texas 77 0 0 0 52 0 0 31 0 160

Washington 168 0 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 176

Wayne 66 0 0 0 122 1 0 73 0 262

* Region Total * 3,618 3 0 20 2,711 6 12 2,187 0 8,557

Southwest Barry 155 0 0 0 118 1 0 39 0 313

Barton 21 0 0 2 75 0 0 14 0 112

Bates 31 0 0 3 15 0 0 11 0 60

Benton 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 21

Camden 109 0 0 0 424 0 0 119 0 652

Cedar 28 0 0 0 38 0 0 5 0 71

Christian 138 1 0 4 361 0 0 48 0 552

Dade 8 0 0 2 27 0 0 4 0 41

Dallas 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 42

Douglas 35 0 1 0 7 0 0 4 0 47

Greene 671 0 0 19 1,252 3 9 173 0 2,127

Henry 70 0 0 0 133 1 0 72 0 276

Hickory 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13

Jasper 483 8 0 0 698 4 3 149 1 1,346

Laclede 142 0 0 0 18 1 0 3 0 164

Lawrence 167 1 0 1 21 0 0 1 0 191

McDonald 91 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 92

Miller 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 64

Moniteau 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18

Morgan 61 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 66

Newton 126 1 0 1 441 0 0 100 0 669

Ozark 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22

Polk 56 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 65

St Clair 21 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 27

Stone 96 0 0 0 320 0 0 77 0 493

Taney 281 0 0 3 180 2 0 99 0 565

Vernon 29 0 0 0 32 1 0 4 0 66

Webster 74 0 0 4 428 0 0 125 0 631

Wright 107 2 0 0 124 1 0 85 0 319

* Region Total * 3,177 14 1 41 4,724 14 12 1,141 1 9,125

Kansas City Jackson 1,710 8 1 56 2,597 28 5 512 0 4,917

* Region Total * 1,710 8 1 56 2,597 28 5 512 0 4,917

St. Louis St Louis City 638 5 0 6 871 9 0 495 0 2,024

St Louis County 1,081 0 0 34 1,165 6 7 592 0 2,885

* Region Total * 1,719 5 0 40 2,036 15 7 1,087 0 4,909

Other Icama 6 35 0 32 2,092 0 0 37 0 2,202

* Region Total * 6 35 0 32 2,092 0 0 37 0 2,202

State Total 13,945 67 2 287 18,194 73 42 6,870 1 39,481

73Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 80: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total

01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 6

Buchanan 61 24 0 3 13 7 1 109

Caldwell 5 2 0 0 3 0 0 10

Carroll 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

Cass 147 12 0 18 4 1 10 192

Chariton 3 3 0 7 6 0 0 19

Clay 93 15 0 8 14 0 0 130

Clinton 25 18 0 5 6 0 0 54

Cooper 7 2 0 3 1 0 0 13

Daviess 13 4 0 2 0 0 0 19

De Kalb 13 11 0 1 6 0 3 34

Gentry 7 5 0 0 8 0 2 22

Grundy 33 0 0 0 3 2 0 38

Harrison 26 2 0 0 1 0 3 32

Holt 10 12 0 0 1 0 0 23

Johnson 98 2 0 5 3 0 3 111

Lafayette 40 8 0 1 1 0 0 50

Linn 39 17 0 9 9 0 6 80

Livingston 31 8 0 5 6 0 4 54

Mercer 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 5

Nodaway 29 3 0 3 9 0 3 47

Pettis 50 17 0 2 24 1 0 94

Platte 30 4 0 8 1 0 0 43

Putnam 18 0 0 1 4 0 1 24

Ray 8 1 0 0 5 0 2 16

Saline 26 11 0 1 2 0 3 43

Sullivan 19 10 0 1 1 0 0 31

Worth 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 4

* Region Total * 845 193 0 84 132 11 44 1,309

Northeast Adair 74 16 0 8 6 1 0 105

Audrain 21 18 0 7 3 2 2 53

Boone 207 54 0 24 23 4 31 343

Callaway 95 22 0 5 9 0 7 138

Clark 26 6 0 1 7 2 1 43

Cole 88 32 0 6 20 5 8 159

Franklin 165 64 0 31 36 5 15 316

Gasconade 22 5 0 1 1 0 0 29

Howard 30 0 0 3 3 3 4 43

Knox 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 12

Lewis 18 0 0 4 0 0 0 22

Lincoln 80 43 0 15 15 0 1 154

Macon 69 5 0 3 1 0 8 86

Marion 121 34 0 16 26 2 9 208

Monroe 20 7 0 2 0 0 0 29

Montgomery 19 17 0 5 1 0 0 42

Osage 8 1 0 0 3 0 0 12

Pike 14 4 0 4 5 0 1 28

Ralls 11 2 0 3 2 0 3 21

Randolph 82 13 0 5 22 1 12 135

Schuyler 12 0 0 0 5 0 0 17

Scotland 18 0 0 2 4 0 0 24

Shelby 29 1 0 3 3 0 3 39

St Charles 124 78 0 39 18 2 3 264

Warren 40 23 0 8 9 0 4 84

* Region Total * 1,401 449 0 195 222 27 112 2,406

Southeast Bollinger 61 3 0 0 4 0 1 69

Butler 116 64 0 24 27 9 6 246

Cape Girardeau 185 15 0 12 11 0 9 232

Carter 12 0 0 1 0 0 4 17

74Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 81: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total

01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Southeast Crawford 73 16 0 5 15 0 7 116

Dent 31 15 0 5 1 5 1 58

Dunklin 78 13 0 8 8 0 7 114

Howell 75 9 0 8 8 4 4 108

Iron 20 7 0 1 10 0 2 40

Jefferson 378 95 0 40 120 16 13 662

Madison 35 10 0 4 2 0 1 52

Maries 15 0 0 1 1 0 0 17

Mississippi 38 0 0 1 8 0 0 47

New Madrid 101 10 0 4 21 2 12 150

Oregon 46 5 0 7 0 0 2 60

Pemiscot 54 9 0 11 33 1 2 110

Perry 35 7 0 1 4 0 1 48

Phelps 171 12 0 11 23 0 7 224

Pulaski 95 33 0 14 13 0 5 160

Reynolds 19 5 0 1 5 0 0 30

Ripley 23 9 0 10 9 1 0 52

Scott 89 1 0 5 36 0 1 132

Shannon 22 6 0 2 5 0 0 35

St Francois 227 32 0 17 9 10 14 309

Ste Genevieve 40 7 0 13 1 0 0 61

Stoddard 113 3 0 17 24 1 0 158

Texas 37 16 0 2 20 0 2 77

Washington 132 15 0 13 6 2 0 168

Wayne 32 21 0 2 6 0 5 66

* Region Total * 2,353 438 0 240 430 51 106 3,618

Southwest Barry 80 48 0 15 9 0 3 155

Barton 10 6 0 4 1 0 0 21

Bates 13 7 0 5 3 0 3 31

Benton 6 6 0 5 0 0 3 20

Camden 75 16 0 4 11 0 3 109

Cedar 14 6 0 3 5 0 0 28

Christian 83 24 0 6 24 1 0 138

Dade 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 8

Dallas 21 11 0 5 1 1 2 41

Douglas 24 7 0 2 1 0 1 35

Greene 329 217 0 56 40 2 27 671

Henry 41 15 0 8 6 0 0 70

Hickory 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 13

Jasper 296 84 0 43 38 1 21 483

Laclede 95 21 0 16 8 0 2 142

Lawrence 77 55 0 15 18 1 1 167

McDonald 55 15 0 7 6 0 8 91

Miller 44 3 0 4 10 1 1 63

Moniteau 11 0 0 0 6 0 1 18

Morgan 53 2 0 1 0 0 5 61

Newton 76 21 0 6 15 0 8 126

Ozark 10 6 0 3 3 0 0 22

Polk 29 9 0 9 8 1 0 56

St Clair 14 1 0 2 0 0 4 21

Stone 49 22 0 2 20 0 3 96

Taney 158 75 0 15 21 2 10 281

Vernon 19 5 0 3 1 0 1 29

Webster 57 5 0 6 4 0 2 74

Wright 71 20 0 6 7 0 3 107

* Region Total * 1,824 713 0 251 267 10 112 3,177

Kansas City Jackson 966 464 0 123 96 9 52 1,710

* Region Total * 966 464 0 123 96 9 52 1,710

St. Louis St Louis City 321 133 0 63 78 21 22 638

St Louis County 576 213 0 79 126 33 54 1,081

* Region Total * 897 346 0 142 204 54 76 1,719

Other Icama 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 6

* Region Total * 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 6

State Total 8,290 2,603 0 1,036 1,352 162 502 13,945

75Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 82: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Number of Placements Average

Total Number of

1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00

Atchison 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 2.50

Buchanan 48 28 9 3 4 5 4 8 109 4.21

Caldwell 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1.60

Carroll 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1.33

Cass 44 49 26 13 17 21 4 18 192 6.15

Chariton 2 3 2 0 0 1 4 7 19 17.68

Clay 48 33 13 8 8 5 7 8 130 4.19

Clinton 13 17 6 2 3 9 2 2 54 4.26

Cooper 2 0 2 1 1 5 1 1 13 8.77

Daviess 7 3 1 4 0 3 1 0 19 3.42

De Kalb 17 14 1 0 0 2 0 0 34 1.85

Gentry 11 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 1.95

Grundy 17 10 4 2 1 3 0 1 38 3.03

Harrison 14 10 1 3 0 1 2 1 32 3.06

Holt 14 1 0 3 0 2 2 1 23 4.74

Johnson 39 30 13 2 5 15 5 2 111 3.51

Lafayette 19 17 2 0 1 6 0 5 50 4.92

Linn 19 26 10 5 4 8 5 3 80 4.75

Livingston 7 28 4 4 3 6 1 1 54 3.39

Mercer 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 3.80

Nodaway 16 8 6 6 2 5 2 2 47 4.02

Pettis 23 33 9 6 7 8 3 5 94 4.69

Platte 13 9 4 6 1 4 2 4 43 5.53

Putnam 9 7 3 2 3 0 0 0 24 2.29

Ray 3 5 7 0 0 1 0 0 16 2.63

Saline 23 11 1 1 3 1 0 3 43 3.53

Sullivan 8 11 1 1 1 7 0 2 31 4.39

Worth 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.25

* Region Total * 431 373 130 72 64 118 47 74 1,309 4.49

Northeast Adair 41 22 14 8 6 5 4 5 105 4.13

Audrain 10 16 8 2 0 6 4 7 53 8.17

Boone 115 77 38 17 14 49 11 22 343 4.96

Callaway 39 37 16 10 7 15 4 9 138 4.66

Clark 16 2 5 8 2 4 1 5 43 6.16

Cole 40 37 34 14 6 19 3 5 159 4.14

Franklin 123 55 47 20 21 26 10 10 316 3.82

Gasconade 11 7 1 2 2 3 1 2 29 4.10

Howard 11 11 5 1 0 10 1 3 43 5.91

Knox 8 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 12 2.08

Lewis 7 1 4 1 2 2 3 2 22 5.91

Lincoln 55 34 21 19 3 13 3 6 154 3.78

Macon 44 20 7 2 0 5 4 4 86 3.80

Marion 71 44 29 20 7 14 10 13 208 4.37

Monroe 18 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 29 3.48

Montgomery 13 6 9 7 1 3 0 3 42 5.88

Osage 5 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 1.75

Pike 10 10 1 0 0 5 1 1 28 3.86

Ralls 8 2 3 3 1 2 1 1 21 3.90

Randolph 46 29 17 9 8 12 6 7 135 4.05

Schuyler 10 2 0 0 0 3 0 2 17 4.76

Scotland 5 4 4 5 1 2 2 1 24 5.79

Shelby 14 11 2 3 1 1 0 7 39 9.28

St Charles 86 58 30 21 15 35 11 8 264 4.00

Warren 30 13 13 5 7 9 5 2 84 4.04

* Region Total * 836 510 310 179 105 244 88 126 2,406 4.48

Southeast Bollinger 27 20 11 3 1 3 1 2 69 3.26

Butler 91 55 27 22 9 16 13 12 246 4.22

Cape Girardeau 99 51 28 13 10 21 4 6 232 3.40

Carter 5 6 3 1 0 2 0 0 17 2.76

76Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 83: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of October 2019

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Number of Placements Average

Total Number of

1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Southeast Crawford 49 22 9 9 6 12 4 5 116 3.91

Dent 13 18 7 3 0 7 6 4 58 5.40

Dunklin 45 35 6 6 5 9 3 5 114 3.51

Howell 28 32 13 10 4 11 5 5 108 4.31

Iron 19 6 8 1 2 2 0 2 40 3.23

Jefferson 279 150 68 49 27 54 16 16 662 3.16

Madison 18 12 5 7 2 3 1 4 52 4.23

Maries 5 8 1 0 1 2 0 0 17 2.76

Mississippi 15 12 9 3 0 4 1 3 47 3.70

New Madrid 81 24 14 6 2 14 3 5 150 3.17

Oregon 21 15 6 4 7 2 4 1 60 3.45

Pemiscot 35 30 8 3 4 13 8 8 110 5.16

Perry 20 15 4 1 1 1 0 6 48 6.50

Phelps 95 48 30 13 8 15 4 11 224 3.60

Pulaski 41 44 22 11 15 14 3 10 160 4.55

Reynolds 15 7 2 2 1 0 2 1 30 3.13

Ripley 14 18 4 5 2 3 4 2 52 4.40

Scott 55 23 10 17 6 17 3 1 132 3.14

Shannon 19 6 2 2 1 3 0 2 35 3.26

St Francois 111 78 29 22 16 30 11 11 309 4.05

Ste Genevieve 13 15 16 3 3 4 3 4 61 4.95

Stoddard 34 67 23 10 4 8 7 5 158 3.47

Texas 35 10 10 8 1 10 2 1 77 3.14

Washington 40 47 21 17 5 18 8 12 168 5.02

Wayne 11 21 10 3 3 15 2 1 66 4.14

* Region Total * 1,333 895 406 254 146 313 118 145 3,618 3.81

Southwest Barry 41 49 27 8 10 9 4 7 155 4.30

Barton 7 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 21 8.90

Bates 14 7 4 2 2 2 0 0 31 2.29

Benton 5 6 3 1 1 1 2 1 20 4.40

Camden 44 28 15 12 1 3 1 5 109 3.34

Cedar 7 10 1 4 1 1 1 3 28 6.54

Christian 56 30 16 14 9 8 2 2 138 2.82

Dade 3 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 1.88

Dallas 13 11 2 3 2 5 1 4 41 5.07

Douglas 16 10 4 2 0 0 1 1 35 2.63

Greene 283 148 66 43 23 59 21 28 671 3.62

Henry 23 12 9 10 4 6 0 6 70 4.36

Hickory 2 6 2 0 2 0 0 1 13 6.08

Jasper 163 106 60 29 27 43 27 27 483 4.45

Laclede 57 28 8 17 6 17 3 6 142 3.85

Lawrence 60 25 22 11 12 13 14 9 167 4.77

McDonald 32 27 12 6 3 7 2 2 91 3.27

Miller 14 18 6 9 4 6 1 5 63 6.27

Moniteau 9 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 18 1.83

Morgan 25 19 3 4 1 8 0 1 61 2.92

Newton 54 31 20 3 3 7 1 7 126 3.48

Ozark 10 3 5 0 0 3 0 0 22 2.73

Polk 21 14 4 4 1 7 1 4 56 4.54

St Clair 13 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 21 4.14

Stone 36 22 13 6 5 8 2 4 96 3.48

Taney 110 74 28 16 13 23 7 9 281 3.62

Vernon 6 10 3 2 1 1 3 3 29 6.17

Webster 31 19 9 2 1 5 3 3 74 3.64

Wright 43 25 19 4 2 5 2 5 107 3.42

* Region Total * 1,198 750 369 215 138 250 103 145 3,177 3.93

Kansas City Jackson 629 359 204 121 87 172 66 66 1,710 3.81

* Region Total * 629 359 204 121 87 172 66 66 1,710 3.81

St. Louis St Louis City 202 119 83 49 34 78 28 39 638 4.85

St Louis County 369 246 149 89 66 97 28 30 1,081 3.72

* Region Total * 571 365 232 138 100 175 56 69 1,719 4.14

Other Icama 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 10.50

* Region Total * 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 10.50

State Total 4,999 3,255 1,651 979 640 1,272 478 627 13,945 4.06

77Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 84: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date October 2019)

Total

FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 2 1 0 3

Atchison 0 1 3 2 0 0 6

Buchanan 5 4 16 16 24 2 67

Caldwell 14 10 3 3 2 9 41

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 18 25 32 36 22 12 145

Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Clay 43 41 44 57 46 5 236

Clinton 1 2 3 0 0 1 7

Cooper 2 0 2 5 7 4 20

Daviess 0 0 3 3 7 2 15

De Kalb 10 24 21 43 32 8 138

Gentry 0 2 0 1 0 0 3

Grundy 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Holt 0 2 2 0 0 0 4

Johnson 12 7 15 12 16 12 74

Lafayette 0 0 1 0 0 1 2

Linn 0 0 0 0 3 1 4

Livingston 0 4 0 0 4 0 8

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 4 2 0 4 0 10

Pettis 6 5 6 15 9 1 42

Platte 17 12 21 17 15 10 92

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 20 6 20 9 21 0 76

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 148 150 195 221 214 69 997

Northeast Adair 10 6 15 8 6 2 47

Audrain 13 10 14 8 6 2 53

Boone 30 42 40 42 51 8 213

Callaway 0 1 2 1 4 0 8

Clark 0 3 1 0 2 0 6

Cole 10 31 24 19 18 4 106

Franklin 36 22 29 64 54 33 238

Gasconade 2 0 2 6 3 1 14

Howard 1 7 0 2 1 0 11

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 13 15 10 30 14 2 84

Macon 5 4 3 4 2 0 18

Marion 15 12 13 10 14 3 67

Monroe 2 1 0 2 8 0 13

Montgomery 0 1 0 2 9 1 13

Osage 0 0 2 0 0 0 2

Pike 2 1 0 2 11 0 16

Ralls 2 1 3 1 1 0 8

Randolph 0 2 10 15 18 3 48

Schuyler 0 2 0 1 0 0 3

Scotland 0 2 1 0 1 0 4

Shelby 2 6 2 2 0 0 12

St Charles 34 42 41 48 48 15 228

Warren 3 3 15 12 7 3 43

* Region Total * 180 214 227 279 278 77 1,255

Southeast Bollinger 5 0 3 2 3 1 14

Butler 1 4 1 0 3 6 15

Cape Girardeau 3 16 24 22 32 5 102

Carter 2 1 1 6 0 0 10

Crawford 0 0 0 10 14 0 24

78Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 85: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date October 2019)

Total

FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions

Southeast Dent 1 0 2 1 11 0 15

Dunklin 0 0 1 2 4 1 8

Howell 3 3 1 9 9 3 28

Iron 3 3 16 8 18 10 58

Jefferson 46 47 41 59 62 16 271

Madison 1 0 0 2 1 0 4

Maries 0 5 2 8 0 0 15

Mississippi 0 0 4 2 1 1 8

New Madrid 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Oregon 1 2 0 0 2 1 6

Pemiscot 0 1 16 9 15 4 45

Perry 3 2 6 4 9 1 25

Phelps 9 19 17 9 18 9 81

Pulaski 13 24 15 19 16 10 97

Reynolds 0 0 5 4 4 0 13

Ripley 27 56 43 25 12 6 169

Scott 8 8 9 9 4 4 42

Shannon 1 0 4 0 1 9 15

St Francois 34 30 34 51 74 32 255

Ste Genevieve 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

Stoddard 18 17 24 33 35 4 131

Texas 8 10 21 3 10 2 54

Washington 0 1 1 2 1 0 5

Wayne 1 14 14 8 2 0 39

* Region Total * 189 266 306 307 362 125 1,555

Southwest Barry 2 1 0 0 4 4 11

Barton 11 3 2 9 7 2 34

Bates 0 1 0 8 4 2 15

Benton 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Camden 39 30 41 57 56 2 225

Cedar 8 1 5 0 7 0 21

Christian 23 40 49 41 34 15 202

Dade 2 3 2 6 6 0 19

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 2 0 0 0 6 1 9

Greene 89 131 140 120 141 25 646

Henry 12 14 9 20 8 3 66

Hickory 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Jasper 69 68 56 61 58 14 326

Laclede 5 0 3 4 8 3 23

Lawrence 2 6 6 4 5 0 23

McDonald 0 3 2 0 0 0 5

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 3 3

Newton 50 57 34 28 39 9 217

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 1 1 0 3 5

St Clair 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Stone 36 43 43 39 35 1 197

Taney 16 20 24 29 23 2 114

Vernon 6 0 11 3 8 0 28

Webster 23 38 58 57 32 10 218

Wright 10 34 10 9 23 2 88

* Region Total * 407 493 497 496 504 101 2,498

Kansas City Jackson 241 274 244 281 298 84 1,422

* Region Total * 241 274 244 281 298 84 1,422

St. Louis St Louis City 71 57 40 55 47 14 284

St Louis County 75 81 91 106 115 34 502

* Region Total * 146 138 131 161 162 48 786

Other Icama 5 1 1 2 1 0 10

* Region Total * 5 1 1 2 1 0 10

State Total 1,316 1,536 1,601 1,747 1,819 504 8,523

79Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 86: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

During October 2019

Total Entries Total Re Entries

12,000

12,200

12,400

12,600

12,800

13,000

13,200

13,400

13,600

13,800

14,000

Oct

-17

No

v-1

7

De

c-1

7

Jan

-18

Feb

-18

Mar

-18

Ap

r-1

8

May

-18

Jun

-18

Jul-

18

Au

g-1

8

Sep

-18

Oct

-18

No

v-1

8

De

c-1

8

Jan

-19

Feb

-19

Mar

-19

Ap

r-1

9

May

-19

Jun

-19

Jul-

19

Au

g-1

9

Sep

-19

Oct

-19

Figure 17.

Children Active in Children's Division Custody

on the Last day of the MonthOctober 2017 Through October 2019

80Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 87: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 18.

Children Closing from Alternative Care During October 2019

by Reason for Case Closing and Region

Returned Home Other

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

Oct

-17

No

v-1

7

De

c-1

7

Jan

-18

Feb

-18

Mar

-18

Ap

r-1

8

May

-18

Jun

-18

Jul-

18

Au

g-1

8

Sep

-18

Oct

-18

No

v-1

8

De

c-1

8

Jan

-19

Feb

-19

Mar

-19

Ap

r-1

9

May

-19

Jun

-19

Jul-

19

Au

g-1

9

Sep

-19

Oct

-19

Figure 19.

Adoptions Finalized by Month

October 2017 Through October 2019

81Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 88: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +

Figure 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody as of October 2019

by Age and Placement Category

Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Oct

-15

De

c-1

5

Feb

-16

Ap

r-1

6

Jun

-16

Au

g-1

6

Oct

-16

De

c-1

6

Feb

-17

Ap

r-1

7

Jun

-17

Au

g-1

7

Oct

-17

De

c-1

7

Feb

-18

Ap

r-1

8

Jun

-18

Au

g-1

8

Oct

-18

De

c-1

8

Feb

-19

Ap

r-1

9

Jun

-19

Au

g-1

9

Oct

-19

Figure 21.

Children in Children's Division Custody

as of the Last Day of the MonthOctober 2015 Through October 2019 by Placement Category

Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home

82Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 89: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

20

15

-1

20

15

-2

20

15

-3

20

15

-4

20

16

-1

20

16

-2

20

16

-3

20

16

-4

20

17

-1

20

17

-2

20

17

-3

20

17

-4

20

18

-1

20

18

-2

20

18

-3

20

18

-4

20

19

-1

20

19

-2

20

19

-3

20

19

-4

Exit

s p

er

10

0 C

hild

ren

inFo

ste

r C

are

Po

pu

lati

on

Figure 22.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody

by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition1st Quarter 2015 Through 4th Quarter 2019

Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home

83Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 90: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures

Table 14.

• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time.

• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 15.

• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home Placements.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 16.

• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.

Table 17. and Table 18.

• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the

month. Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.

Table 19.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

Page 91: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG

Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May

19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 20.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Placement Types are:

ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other)

ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent

CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention

FAH Foster Adoptive Home

FGB Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FGH Foster Family Group Home

FGM Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home

FHE Emergency Foster Home

FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home

ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home

KHB Kinship Behavioral Home

KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home

KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy

MMD Medical Facility MMF Mental Health Facility

MMH Mental Health Home

MMW Mental Health Medicaid Waiver RFA Residential Treatment Facility

RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2

RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3

RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency

RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant

RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare

RHB Behavioral Relative Home

RHM Medical Relative Home

Page 92: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis

Table 20 (contd).

RHO Relative Home

RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway

SCH School

TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group

TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site

Table 21.

• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Table 22.

Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.

• Closing categories include the following closing reasons:

Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to sending state)

Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative)

Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency

Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship and Other

Table 23.

• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative

and/or legal father).

• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been

completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).

• Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal

Status 5.

• No Identified Adoptive Resource includes Legal Status 1 children with a Goal of 'AD' and no

pre-adoptive placement marked.

Page 93: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis

Table 24.

• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, FH, LA, RH, and KH.

• Existing vendor types RH and KH were added to this table in October 2015 and are shown

under the heading Relative Home.

• Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have

either no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago.

• The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago” represent unduplicated vendor counts.

Table 25.

• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody)

LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents

LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency

LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care)

LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship

LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement

Table 26.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Goals are: 01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s)

AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child

06 - Child Independence/Independent Living

07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives

09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing

Table 27.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of

placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1.

• The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors.

• Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous

vendor.

Page 94: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis

Table 28.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children

are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.

Figure 18.

• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s)

Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated,

Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.

Figure 19.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children

are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal

Status 5.

Figure 20.

• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG

Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Figure 21.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Page 95: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Intensive In-Home Services

Page 96: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During October 2019

Grouped by Referral County

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 1 11.11% 4 44.44% 4 44.44% 9

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Callaway 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Cole 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Franklin 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Ralls 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Charles 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Warren 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 21 63.64% 12 36.36% 33

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 1 80.00% 0 0.00% 1

Butler 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 1 20.00% 5

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Carter 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

for Screening

Referrals Accepted

Accepted

Referrals

Accepted

Referrals Not

90

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 97: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During October 2019

Grouped by Referral County

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dent 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Dunklin 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 6

Madison 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4

Pulaski 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scott 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Texas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 4 10.00% 29 72.50% 7 17.50% 40

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Barton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Camden 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cedar 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Christian 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Dallas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Douglas 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Greene 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 8

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 1 5.56% 4 22.22% 13 72.22% 18

Laclede 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Lawrence 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Newton 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5

Taney 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Webster 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Wright 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 1 1.52% 33 50.00% 32 48.48% 66

Kansas City Jackson 2 10.53% 8 42.11% 9 47.37% 19

* Region Total * 2 10.53% 8 42.11% 9 47.37% 19

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

St Louis County 0 0.00% 11 78.57% 3 21.43% 14

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 13 76.47% 4 23.53% 17

State Total 8 4.35% 108 58.70% 68 36.96% 184

Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not

for Screening Accepted Accepted

91

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 98: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During October 2019

Grouped by Household County

Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk

Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Buchanan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cass 2 2 1.00 2 1.00

Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Clay 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Clinton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Johnson 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Lafayette 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Linn 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Livingston 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pettis 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Platte 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Putnam 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Saline 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

* Region Total * 4 6 1.50 5 1.25

Northeast Adair 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Audrain 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Boone 2 5 2.50 5 2.50

Callaway 2 4 2.00 4 2.00

Clark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cole 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Franklin 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Gasconade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Howard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Lewis 2 6 3.00 4 2.00

Lincoln 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Macon 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Marion 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Osage 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Pike 2 5 2.50 5 2.50

Ralls 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Randolph 2 8 4.00 8 4.00

Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Shelby 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

St Charles 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Warren 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

* Region Total * 19 50 2.63 44 2.32

Southeast Bollinger 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Butler 5 15 3.00 10 2.00

Cape Girardeau 1 5 5.00 1 1.00

Carter 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

92

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 99: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During October 2019

Grouped by Household County

Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk

Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family

Southeast Crawford 1 4 4.00 1 1.00

Dent 3 11 3.67 11 3.67

Dunklin 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Iron 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Jefferson 4 10 2.50 5 1.25

Madison 2 5 2.50 5 2.50

Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pemiscot 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Perry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Phelps 3 8 2.67 7 2.33

Pulaski 1 4 4.00 3 3.00

Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ripley 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Scott 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

St Francois 4 14 3.50 13 3.25

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Stoddard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Washington 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Wayne 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

* Region Total * 30 84 2.80 64 2.13

Southwest Barry 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Barton 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Benton 1 4 4.00 4 4.00

Camden 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Cedar 2 7 3.50 6 3.00

Christian 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dallas 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Douglas 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Greene 5 12 2.40 10 2.00

Henry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Jasper 4 13 3.25 11 2.75

Laclede 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Lawrence 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

McDonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Miller 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Morgan 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Newton 2 5 2.50 2 1.00

Ozark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Polk 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Stone 3 7 2.33 7 2.33

Taney 2 5 2.50 4 2.00

Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Webster 1 4 4.00 3 3.00

Wright 2 4 2.00 3 1.50

* Region Total * 32 88 2.75 69 2.16

Kansas City Jackson 9 23 2.56 21 2.33

* Region Total * 9 23 2.56 21 2.33

St. Louis St Louis City 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

St Louis County 10 27 2.70 24 2.40

* Region Total * 11 29 2.64 26 2.36

State Total 105 280 2.67 229 2.18

93

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 100: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Buchanan 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 10

Northeast Adair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Audrain 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Boone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Marion 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Warren 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 9 47.37% 10 52.63% 0 0.00% 19

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cape Girardeau 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Family Intact Family Not Intact Other

94Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 101: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 11 84.62% 2 15.38% 0 0.00% 13

Southwest Barry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Greene 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Jasper 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Laclede 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Newton 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Vernon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Webster 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Wright 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

* Region Total * 19 67.86% 7 25.00% 2 7.14% 28

Kansas City Jackson 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Louis County 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8

* Region Total * 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8

State Total 53 66.25% 25 31.25% 2 2.50% 80

Family Not Intact Family Intact Other

95Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 102: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During April 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

96Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 103: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During April 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Moniteau 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wright 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

State Total 19 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

97Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 104: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2018

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pettis 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 5 50.00% 4 40.00% 1 10.00% 10

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

98Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 105: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During October 2018

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Laclede 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9

Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

State Total 13 65.00% 6 30.00% 1 5.00% 20

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

99Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 106: Children's Services Management Reportdss.mo.gov/re/pdf/csmr/1910-childrens-services-management-report.pdfChildren’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State

Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables

Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.

• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question

and an exit status which is not missing.

• Exit status includes the following status codes:

Family Intact

10 Family Intact

Family Not Intact

12 Child Ran Away 13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed)

14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered) 15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)

16 In Foster Home or Group Home

17 In Residential 18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services)

19 In Juvenile Justice 20 In In-Patient Psychiatric

Other

11 Can't Locate Family

21 Information Not Available 99 Other

Table 32. and Table 33.

Tables include only those families which responded to follow-up requests. These do not

equal the numbers for Table 31. for the corresponding table six or twelve months prior.