Che415 Explosion Hazards
-
Upload
craigunderwood -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Che415 Explosion Hazards
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
1/63
Advanced Particle Processes -Fire and Explosion Hazards
Chunyan Fan
Department of Chemical EngineeringSemester 1, 2014
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
2/63
2
OUTLINE
Introduction
Combustion Fundamentals
Combustion in Dust Clouds
Control of the Hazards
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
3/63
3
Introduction - History of Industrial Explosions
National Fire
ProtectionAssoc. formed
(NFPA)
First recorded millexplosion, flour
dust, Italy
1785 late 1800s
Studies of f lour
mill explosions
begin in US
1896
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
4/63
4
Introduction Early timelines of events
Occupational Safety
& Health Adm.formed (OSHA)
Coal dust mine
explosion, UT
1900
1922
NFPA creates
Explosive DustCommittee
1970
246 dead
early 1900s
Studies of coal
dust explosions
begin in US
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
5/63
5
Introduction Combustible Dust Explosions History
January 29, 2003 - West
Pharmaceutical Services,
Kinston, NC Six deaths, dozens of
injuries
Facil ity produced
rubber stoppers andother products for
medical use
Plastic powder
accumulated abovesuspended ceiling
ignited
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
6/63
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
7/63
7
Introduction Combustible Dust Explosions History
February 20, 2003 CTA
Acoustics, Corbin, KY
Seven Workers died
Facil ity produced
fiberglass insulation
for automotive
industry
Resin accumulated
in production area
that got ignited
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
8/63
8
Introduction Combustible Dust Explosions History
October 29, 2003 - Hayes
Lemmerz Manufacturing
Plant Two severely burned
(one of the victims
died)
Facility
manufactured cast
aluminium
automotive wheels
Accumulated
aluminium dust
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
9/63
9
Introduction Combustible Dust Explosions History
Malden Mills
Methuen, MADecember 11, 1995
37 Injured
Nylon Fibre
Jahn Foundry
Springfield, MAFebruary 26, 1999
3 dead 9 Injured
Phenolic resin dust
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
10/63
10
Introduction Combustible Dust Explosions History
Ford River Rouge:
SecondaryFebruary 1, 1999
6 dead, 36 injured
Coal Dust Explosion
Rouse Polymerics
Vicksburg, MSMay 16, 2002
5 dead, 7 injured
Rubber Dust
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
11/63
11
Introduction Combustible Dust
What Combustible Dusts are explosible?
Metal dust such as aluminium
and magnesium
Wood dust
Coal and other carbon dusts
Plastic dust
Biosolids Organic dust such as sugar,
paper, soap, and dried blood
Certain textile materials
Flour Dust;
Sawdust;
Dust Explosion at Imperial Sugar
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
12/63
12
IntroductionWhich Industries have Potential Dust Explosion Hazards?
Food products
24%
Lumber & wood products
15%
Chemical manufacturing
12%Primary metal industries
8%
Rubber & Plastic products
8%
Electric services
8%
Other
7%
Fabricated metal products
7%
Furniture & Fixtures
4%Equipment manufacturing
7%
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
13/63
13
Introduction
Finely divided combustible solids, or dusts, dispersed
in air can give rise to explosions in much the same
way as flammable gases.
In the case of flammable gases, fuel concentration,
local heat transfer conditions, oxygen concentration
and initial temperature all affect ignition and resulting
explosion characteristics.
In the case of dusts, however, more variables are
involved (e.g. particle size distribution, moisture
content) and so the analysis and prediction of dustexplosion characteristics is more complex than for the
flammable gases.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
14/63
14
OUTLINE
Introduction
Combustion Fundamentals
Combustion in Dust Clouds
Control of the Hazards
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
15/63
15
Combustion Fundamentals - 1
Classic Fire Triangle
Remove any element
eliminates the
possibility of fire
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
16/63
16
Combustion Fundamentals - 2
Dust Explosion Pentagon
Remove any element
prevents explosion,
but not necessarily
fire!
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
17/63
17
Combustion Fundamentals - 3
Flames
Stationary flame (for example a candle flame or gas
stove flame)
unburned fuel and air flow into the flame
front as combustion products flow away
from the flame front.
A stationary flame may be from either premixed fuel and air,or by diffusion of air into the combustion zone.
Explosion flame
the flame front passes through a homogeneous premixed
fuel air mixture.
The heat released and gases generated result in either an
uncontrolled expansion effect or, if the expansion is
restricted, a rapid build-up of pressure.
Bunsen
burner
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
18/63
18
Combustion Fundamentals - 4
Explosions and Detonations-1 Explosion flames travel through the fuelair mixture at velocities
ranging from a few metres/second to several hundreds of metres/
second and this type of explosion is called a deflagration.
Flame speeds are governed by many factors including the heat of
combustion of the fuel, the degree of turbulence in the mixture and the
amount of energy supplied to cause ignition.
It is possible for flames to reach supersonic velocities under some
circumstances. Such explosions are accompanied by pressure shockwaves, are far more destructive and called detonations.
The increased velocities result from increased gas densities generated
by pressure waves. It is not yet understood what conditions give rise to
detonations. However, in practice it is likely that all detonations begin as
deflagrations.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
19/63
19
Combustion Fundamentals - 5
Explosions and Detonations-2
Deflagration. Propagation of a combustion zone at a speedthat is less than the speed of sound in the unreacted medium.
Detonation. Propagation of a combustion zone at a velocitythat is greater than the speed of sound in the unreacted
medium.
Explosion. The bursting or rupture of an enclosure or acontainer due to the development of internal pressure from
deflagration.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
20/63
20
Combustion Fundamentals - 6
The Typical Explosion Event- 1
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
21/63
21
Combustion Fundamentals - 7
The Typical Explosion Event- 2
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
22/63
22
Combustion Fundamentals - 8
The Typical Explosion Event- 3
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
23/63
23
Combustion Fundamentals - 9
The Typical Explosion Event- 4
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
24/63
24
Combustion Fundamentals - 10
The Typical Explosion Event- 5
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
25/63
25
Combustion Fundamentals - 11
The Typical Explosion Event- 6
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
26/63
26
Combustion Fundamentals - 12
The Typical Explosion Event- 7
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
27/63
27
Combustion Fundamentals - 13
The Typical Explosion Event- 8
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
28/63
28
Combustion Fundamentals - 14
The Typical Explosion Event- 9
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
29/63
29
Combustion Fundamentals - 15
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-1
Ignition is the self-propagation of a combustion reaction
through a fuel air mixture after the initial supply of energy.
Ignition of a fuel-air mixture can be analysed in a mannersimilar to that used for thermal explosions.
Volume -
Surface area -
Volumetric concentration of fuel -
Heat transfer coefficient -
Fuel air mixture
The rate of heat loss to surroundings, is:
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
30/63
30
Combustion Fundamentals - 16
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-2
The rate of heat loss to surroundings, is:
The variation of the combustion reaction rate
with temperature will be governed by the
Arrhenius equation. For a reaction which is
first order in fuel concentration:
- pre-exponential coefficient the reaction activation energy
ideal gas constant
- molar density of the fuel
(Eq. 1)
(Eq. 2)
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
31/63
31
Combustion Fundamentals - 17
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-3
The rateat which heat is adsorbed by the fuel-air mixture in
the element is:
1
, - molar specific heat capacities of fuel and air
,
- molar densities of the fuel and air
(Eq. 3)
If is the rate at which heat energy is fed into the
element from outside, then the heat balance for the element
becomes:
Zexp
1
(Eq. 4)
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
32/63
32
Combustion Fundamentals - 18
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-4
Heat balance for the element:
Zexp
1 2
1
3 4
For steady state: term(3)= 0
Analyse the heat balance graphically
Plot the rates of heat loss to the surroundings (term 4) and the
rate of heat generation by the combustion reaction (term 2) asa function of temperature.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
33/63
33
Combustion Fundamentals - 19
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-5
At an initial element temperature Ti the rate of heat loss from theelement is greater than the rate of heat generation and so the
temperature of the element will decrease until point A is reached.
Any initial temperature between TB and TA will result in the element
cooling to TA . This is a stable condition.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
34/63
34
Combustion Fundamentals - 20
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-6
If the initial temperature is greater than TB , the rate of heat
generation will be always greater than the rate of heat loss to the
surroundings and so the element temperature will rise,
exponentially. Thus initial temperatures beyond TB give rise to an
unstable condition. TB is the ignition temperature, Tig , for the fuel
air mixture in the element.
Ignition energy is the energy that we must supply from theoutside in order to raise the mixture from its initial temperature Ti
to the ignition temperature Tig. Since the element is continuously
losing energy to the surroundings, the ignition energy will actually
be a rate of energy input, Q input .
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
35/63
35
Combustion Fundamentals - 21
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-7
This raises the heat generation curve by an amount Qinput ,
reducing the value of Tig. The conditions for heat transfer from
the element to the surroundings are obviously important in
determining temperature and energy.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
36/63
36
Combustion Fundamentals - 22
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-8
There are cases where the heat loss curve will be always lower
than the heat generation curve. Under such circumstances the
mixture may self-ignite; this is referred to as auto-ignition or
spontaneous ignition.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
37/63
37
Combustion Fundamentals - 23
Ignition, Ignition Energy, Ignition Temperature-9
In many combustion systems there is an appreciable interval
(from milliseconds to several minutes) between arrival at the
ignition temperature and the apparent onset of ignition. This is
known as the ignition delay.
Minimum Ignition Temperature (MIT). The lowest temperature at
which ignition occurs.
Lower the particle size Lower the MIT Lower the moisture content - Lower the MIT
Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE). The lowest electrostatic spark
energy that is capable of igniting a dust cloud.
Energy Units (millijoules) Decrease in particle size and moisture content decreases MIE
An increase in temperature in dust cloud atmosphere - decreases
MIE
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
38/63
38
Combustion Fundamentals - 24
Flammability Limits-1
From the analysis it can be seen that below a certain fuel
concentration ignition will not occur, since the rate of heat
generation within the element is insufficient to match the rate of
heat loss to the surroundings (Tigis never reached).
This concentration is known as the lower flammability limit CfLof
the fuel air mixture.
At CfL
the oxygen is in excess.
Lower Flammable Limit (CFL). The lowest concentration of a
combustible substance in an oxidizing medium.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
39/63
39
Combustion Fundamentals - 25
Flammability Limits-2 For fuel concentration increase beyond the stoichiometric ratio,
the oxygen is limiting and so the amount of fuel reacting per unit
volume of mixture and the quantity of heat released per unit
volume decrease with fuel concentration.
A point is reached when the heat release per unit volume of
mixture is too low to sustain a flame.
This is the upper flammability limit, CfU. This is the concentration
of fuel in the fuel air mixture above which a flame cannot bepropagated.
Upper Flammable Limit (Cfu). The highest concentration of a
combustible substance in an oxidizing medium that will propagate a
flame.
Within the range of from CfL to CfU, a flame can be propagated, this
range will widen (CfLwill decrease and CfU will increase) as the initial
temperature of the mixture is increased. In practice, flammability limits
are measured and quoted at standard temperatures (usually 20C).
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
40/63
40
Combustion Fundamentals - 26
Minimum oxygen for combustion-1 At the lower limit of flammability there is more oxygen available than is
required for stoichiometric combustion of the fuel.
For example, the lower flammability limit for propane in air at 20C is
2.2% by volume.
For complete combustion of propane according to the reaction:
five volumes of oxygen are required per volume of fuel propane.
5 3+4O
In a fuel air mixture with 2.2% propane the ratio of air to propane is:
100 2.2
2.2 44.45
and since air is approximately 21% oxygen, the ratio of oxygen to propane
is 9.33. Thus in the case of propane at the lower flammability limit oxygen
is in excess by approximately 87%.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
41/63
41
Combustion Fundamentals - 27
Minimum oxygen for combustion-2
It is therefore possible to reduce the concentration of oxygen in
the fuel air mixture whilst still maintaining the ability to
propagate a flame.
When the effect on the ability of the mixture to maintain a flame is
minimal until the stoichiometric ratio of oxygen to fuel is reached,
the oxygen concentration in the mixture under these conditions is
known as the minimum oxygen for combustion (MOC).
Minimum oxygen for combustion is therefore the stoichiometricoxygen equivalent to the lower flammability limit. Thus
For example, for propane, since under stoichiometric conditions five
volumes of oxygen are required per volume of fuel propane,
2.2% 5 11%
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
42/63
42
OUTLINE
Introduction
Combustion Fundamentals
Combustion in Dust Clouds
Control of the Hazards
C i i C 1
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
43/63
43
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 1
Fundamental Specific to Dust Cloud Explosions-1
The combustion rate of solid in air will in most cases be limited by
the surface area of solid presented to the air.
If the particles of solids are small enough to be dispersed in airwithout too much propensity to settle, the reaction rate will be
great enough to permit an explosion flame to propagate.
For a dust explosion to occur the solid materials of which the
particles are composed must be combustible, i.e. it must reactexothermically with the oxygen in air.
To make the combustion fundamentals applicable to dust
explosions, need to add in the influence of particle size on
reaction rate.
C b i i D Cl d 2
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
44/63
44
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 2
Fundamental Specific to Dust Cloud Explosions-2 Assuming the combustion reaction rate is determined by the surface
area of the solid fuel particles (assumed spherical) exposed to the air,
the heat release term (2) in Eq. (4) becomes:
6
- particle size; - molar density of the solids fuel
The rate of heat generated by the combustion reaction is inverselyproportional to the dust particle size. Thus the likelihood of flame
propagation and explosion will increase with decreasing particle size.
Qualitatively, this is because finer fuel particles:
More readily form a dispersion in air; Have larger surface area per unit mass of fuel;
Offer greater surface area for reaction;
Consequently generate more heat per unit mass of fuel;
Have greater heat-up rate.
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
45/63
C b ti i D t Cl d 4
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
46/63
46
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 4
Characteristics of Dust Explosions -2
Most test include an assessment of the following
explosion characteristics:
Minimum dust concentration for explosion;
Minimum energy for ignition;
Minimum ignition temperature;
Maximum explosion pressure;
Maximum rate of pressure rise during explosion;
Minimum oxygen for combustion.
Classification test A test for explosibility in the test apparatus,classifying the dust as able or unable to ignite and propagate a flame in
air at room temperature under test conditions.
C b ti i D t Cl d 5
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
47/63
47
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 5
Apparatus for Determination of Dust Explosion Characteristics-1
All devices include:
A vessel(open or closed);
An ignition source(electrical spark or electrically heated wire coil);
A supply of air for dispersion of the dust.
Vertical Tube apparatus: The simplest
Classification test
Minimum dust concentration
for explosion
Minimum energy for ignition Minimum oxygen for combustion
Comb stion in D st Clo ds 6
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
48/63
48
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 6
Apparatus for Determination of Dust Explosion Characteristics-220 Litre Sphere:
Maximum explosion pressure
Maximum rate of pressure rise during explosion
These give an indication of the severity of explosion and enable the designof explosion protect equipment.
Combustion in Dust Clouds 7
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
49/63
49
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 7
Apparatus for Determination of Dust Explosion Characteristics-3
The vessel pressure is reduced to about 0.4 bar before the test so that
upon injection of the dust, the pressure rises to atmospheric.
Ignition is by a pyrotechnical device with a standard total energy
(typically 10 kJ) positioned at the centre of the sphere. The delay
between dispersion of the dust and initiation of the ignition source has
been found to affect the results. Turbulence caused by the air injection
influences the rate of the combustion reaction
Combustion in Dust Clouds 8
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
50/63
50
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 8
Apparatus for Determination of Dust Explosion Characteristics-4
Godbert-Greenwald furnace
Godbert-Greenwald furnace
apparatus:
Determine the minimum ignitiontemperature
It includes a vertical electrically
heated furnace tube which can
be raised to controlledtemperatures up to 1000C.
When ignition occurs, the
furnace temperature is lowered
in 10C steps until ignition doesnot occur.
Combustion in Dust Clouds 9
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
51/63
51
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 9
Applications of the Test Results-1 The minimum dust concentration for explosion is used to give an
indication of the quantities of air to be used in extraction systems for
combustible dusts.
The minimum energy for ignition is measured primarily to determine
whether the dust cloud could be ignited by an electrostatic spark.
The minimum ignition temperature indicates the maximum temperature
for equipment surfaces in contact with the powder.
The maximum explosion pressure is usually in the range of 8-13 bar
and is used mainly to determine the design pressure for equipment
when explosion containment or protection is opted for as the method of
dust explosion control.
Combustion in Dust Clouds 10
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
52/63
52
Combustion in Dust Clouds - 10
Applications of the Test Results-2 The maximum rate of pressure rise during explosion is used in the
design of explosion relief.
It has been demonstrated that the maximum rate of pressure rise in a dust explosion is
inversely proportional to the cube root of the vessel volume, i.e.
The value ofis found to be constant for a given powder. The severity of dust explosion
is classified according to the St class based on thevalue.
The minimum oxygen for combustion (MOC) is used to determine the
maximum permissible oxygen concentration when inerting is selected
as the means of controlling the dust explosion.
Dust explosion classes based on 1m3
test apparatus
OUTLINE
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
53/63
53
OUTLINE
Introduction
Combustion Fundamentals
Combustion in Dust Clouds
Control of the Hazards
Control of the Hazards - 1
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
54/63
54
Control of the Hazards - 1
Dust Control
Ignition Source Control
Damage Control
Control of the Hazards - 2
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
55/63
55
Control of the Hazards - 2
The main approaches in approximate order of decreasing strategic
component:
Change the process to eliminate the dust;
Design the plant to withstand the pressure generated by any explosion;
Remove the oxygen by complete inerting;
Reduce oxygen to below MOC;
Add moisture to the dust;
Add diluent powder to the dust;
Detect start of explosion and inject suppressant;
Vent the vessel to relive pressure generated by the explosion;
Control dust concentration to be outside flammability limits;
Minimize dust cloud formation;
Exclude ignition sources.
Control of the Hazards - 3
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
56/63
56
Control of the Hazards 3
Ignition Sources Control
Electrical equipment
Static electricity control Mechanical sparks & friction
Open flame control
Design of heating systems & heated surfaces
Use of tools & vehicles
Maintenance
Control of the Hazards - 4
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
57/63
57
Control of the Hazards 4
Explosion Relief Venting
Explosion Relief venting is the process of relieving the explosion
products (pressure and flame) from the plant to a safe location.
The principle of explosion venting is to discharge the vessel contentsthrough an opening or vent to prevent the pressure rising above the
vessel design pressure.
Advantage: relatively simple and inexpensive
Limits:
Cannot be used when the dust, gas or combustion products are toxic.
Very strong explosible dust with rate of pressure rise is greater than 600bar
m/s would be very difficult to vent (Lunn, 1992).
Venting of explosions to inside a building is not usually acceptable.
Control of the Hazards - 5
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
58/63
58
Control of the Hazards 5
Explosion Suppression
Explosion suppression is detecting an explosion at an early stage and
suppressing it with a suitable suppressant (inert gas or powder).
The suppression systems triggered by the pressure rise accompanyingthe start of the explosion have response times of the order of a few ms,
and are able to effectively extinguish the explosion (within 0.08sec).
Advantage:
Extinguishing the flame Reducing the risk of ejecting toxic/or corrosive materials to the atmosphere
Process equipment does not need to be located in an area suitable for
explosion relief venting
Disadvantage: More expensive to install and maintain than explosion relief venting.
Some suppression systems are not suitable for powders with high
explosion severity (above 300 bar m/sec).
Control of the Hazards - 6
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
59/63
59
Control of the Hazards 6
Containment
Where plant vessels are of small dimensions it may be
economic to design them to withstand the maximum pressure
generated by the dust explosion.
All interconnected pipes, flanges, covers, etc. should
withstand the maximum explosion pressure of the dust being
handled.
If an explosion-resistant vessel fails, the pressure effects will
be more severe than if an extremely weak vessel fails as aresult of dust explosion.
Inerting
Nitrogen and carbon dioxide are commonly used to reduce
the oxygen concentration of air to below the MOC.
Control of the Hazards - 6
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
60/63
60
Minimize Dust Cloud Formation
Use of dense phase conveying as an alternative to dilute phase
Use of cyclone separators and filters instead of settling vessels for
separation of conveyed powder from air
Avoiding situations where a powder stream is allowed to fall freely
through air
Good housekeeping practice should be ensure.
Example-1
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
61/63
61
p
A fine flammable dust is leaking from a pressurized container at a
rate of 2 litre/min into a room of volume 6m3 and forming a
suspension in the air. The minimum explosible concentration of the
dust in air at room temperature is 2.22% by volume. Assuming that
the dust is fine enough to settle only very slowly from suspension,
(a)what will be the time from the start of the leak before explosion
occurs in the room if the air ventilation rate in the room is 4m3/h,
and
(b)What would be the minimum safe ventilation rate under these
circumstances?
Example-2
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
62/63
62
p
Solution:(a) Mass balance on the dust in the room:
assuming constant gas density,
0.12 4
where 0.12 is the leak rate in m3
/h,is the volume of the room andis the dust concentration in the room at time.
Rearranging the integrating with the initial condition, 0at 0,
1.50.12 4
0.12
Assuming the explosion occurs when the dust concentration reaches
the lower flammability limit, 2.22%
2.02
Example-3
-
8/12/2019 Che415 Explosion Hazards
63/63
63
p
Solution-continue:
(b) To ensure safety, the limiting ventilation rate is that which gives a room
dust concentration of 2.22% at steady stage (i.e. when 0).
Under this condition,
0 0.12
hence, the minimum ventilation rate, 5.4 .