Charter School Renewal Program Revieweagendatoc.brevardschools.org/02-27-2018 School Board Meeting...

Brevard Public Schools The Division of Equity, Innovation and Choice

Charter School Renewal Program Review for

Odyssey Preparatory Charter Academy

January, 2018

Introduction The School Board of Brevard County, Florida (School Board), as the Sponsor of all charter schools within Brevard County, is committed to authorizing new and innovative charter schools that provide high-quality educational options to serve the diverse needs of our students. The contractual agreement between Odyssey Preparatory Charter Academy and the School Board will expire on June 30, 2018. In accordance with the Florida Charter School Law, a charter school may be renewed provided that a program review demonstrates that the school has successfully fulfilled the terms of its contract pursuant to Section 1002.33(7)(a)(17), F.S. The renewal process is designed to provide an overview of the charter school’s performance, success and challenges, over the entire term of the charter contract, and is guided by three questions:

1. Is the academic program successful? 2. Is the organization viable? 3. Is the charter school demonstrating good faith in following the terms of its current charter

contract and all applicable laws? This document provides the results of the program review, which was conducted by the Division of Equity, Innovation and Choice (EIC). In conducting a renewal program review, EIC focused its analysis on the school’s performance in three categories:

1. Educational performance 2. Financial performance 3. Organizational performance

Section 1002.33, F.S. requires that student performance be the most important factor in the consideration of charter renewal. The sponsor may also choose not to renew the charter for any of the following grounds:

1. Failure to participate in the state’s educational accountability system created in S. 1008.31, F.S. or failure to meet the requirements for student performance stated in the charter.

2. Failure to meet generally acceptable standards of fiscal management. 3. Violation of law. 4. Other good cause shown.

Renewals shall be for a term of five years unless another term is mutually agreed upon, required, or allowed by law. Upon approval, the contract will be renewed following the contract negotiation process in current School Board policy.

Timeline and Process The Charter School Renewal Application and Report process begins in July of the school year for which the charter application expires, with EIC requesting a letter of intent from the charter school. Compliance reviews begin in late-September and the renewal data will be finalized by the end of November. A District Review Team will be convened to review and evaluate the evidence collected throughout the renewal process, and make a recommendation as to whether a school should be renewed in accordance with the Charter Law and School Board Policy 9800, Charter Schools. Only those schools recommended for renewal by the District Team will proceed to negotiations for a renewal contract.

Step Status Description Responsibility

1. For All Renewals

At least 120 days before the scheduled end of a charter school contract, the district requests a letter of intent from the charter school. EIC

2. For All Renewals

The charter school submits a written letter of intent to the sponsor seeking renewal or notifies the sponsor that it will allow the charter to expire without renewal.

Charter School

3. For All Renewals

District review team conducts a program review of the charter school as required in §1002.33(7)(a)(19)(c), F.S., including academic successes, fiscal accountability, governance, contractual compliance, and adherence to federal and state law, including how each of the criteria established in §1002.33(7)(a)(1-16) have been met, and verifying that none of the causes for termination established in §1002.33(8)(a) exist.

District Review Team

4.

Non-Renewal Only

At least ninety days prior to non-renewing or terminating a charter at the end of the contract period, the sponsor must notify the governing body of the charter school of the proposed action in writing. (This step does not apply if the Board determines that an emergency situation exists.)

EIC

5.

Non-Renewal Only

The school’s governing body may, within 14 calendar days after receiving the notice for non-renewal or termination, request an informal hearing before the sponsor.

Charter School

6. Non-Renewal Only

The Sponsor must conduct the informal hearing within 30 calendar days after receiving the charter school’s written request. EIC

7. Renewal Division of Equity, Innovation and Choice with Board attorney compiles new contract EIC

8. Renewal An electronic copy of the contract is sent to charter school for review and negotiation. EIC

9. Renewal Charter school’s original application is to be reviewed and updated using Track Changes. Charter school will submit the updated application to the sponsor during contract negotiations.

Charter School

10. Renewal Agenda is created for charter contract and updated application to go to School Board for approval. EIC

11. Renewal Signed copy of contract is provided to governing body of charter school. EIC

12. Renewal Signed copy of contract is kept in charter school file. EIC

Executive Summary

School Name and Address Odyssey Preparatory Charter Academy

1350 Wyoming Drive SE

Palm Bay, Florida 32909

Legal Entity Odyssey Charter School, Inc.

Governing Board Chair Leslie Maloney Principal Monica Knight

Maximum Enrollment (based on building capacity)

918 Current Enrollment (October FTE)

374

Chartered Grade Span K-6 Current Grade Span K-6

MSID Number 6541 Title I Eligibility Yes

Initial Year of Operation 2013-14 Termination Date of Current Contract

June 30, 2018

Previous Renewal Terms (if applicable)

Not Applicable High Performing Status and Year of Designation/Removal (if applicable)

Not Applicable

Majority Feeder Pattern Columbia, Jupiter, Port Malabar, Riviera, Turner and Westside

Curriculum Focus Blended methodology that includes the Montessori approach with other compatible models such as research or project-based education

School Mission Statement The mission of Odyssey Preparatory Academy is to work in partnership with the family and community, with the aim of helping each child reach full potential in all areas of life. We seek to educate the whole child with the understanding that each person must achieve a balance of intellectual, emotional, physical, spiritual and social skills as a foundation for life.

Indicators and Standards The following defines specific indicators (the types and level of information and data that will be collected) and standards (the benchmark by which such indicators will be measured) that was analyzed. A school’s performance within these indicators is the most crucial factor in determining a charter renewal decision. The Division of Equity, Innovation and Choice has determined the standard status based on a review and analysis of pertinent data points, site visits, and other relevant data.

Focus Area Meets the Standard

Approaches Standard

Does Not Meet

Standard Rubric

Educational Performance

A. State Accountability

X

5-6 of 6 indicators = Meets the Standard

3-4 of 6 indicators = Approaches the Standard

1-2 of 6 indicators = Does not meet the standard

B. Educational Program Implementation

X




Financial Performance

A. Financial Management

X

3 of 3 indicators = Meets the Standard

2 of 3 indicators = Approaches the Standard

1 of 3 indicators = Does not meet the standard

B. Financial Viability

X

3 of 3 indicators = Meets the Standard


1 of 3 indicators = Does not meet the standard

Organizational Performance

A. Student Enrollment & Conduct

X




B. Governance, Staff and Parents

X




C. Facilities X 1 of 1 indicators = Meets the Standard

0 of 1 indicators = Does not meet the Standard

EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE Focus Area Indicator Standard/Criteria Sources of Evidence

Include (but are not limited to)

A. State Accountability

1. FSA achievement

Students at the school demonstrate proficiency or progress towards meeting proficiency, in subjects tested (mathematics, reading, writing and science).

FSA and/or other state accountability tests as applicable

2. School grade “C” or above School grade as determined by FDOE

3. Annual student gains

Students are making one-year’ worth of growth annually in mathematics and reading.


4. Annual gains of students achieving in the bottom 25%

50% make one-year’ worth of growth.


5. % of students tested

The school is appropriately administering applicable state standardized tests to its students.


6. Comparable performance

The school’s performance meets or exceeds the performance of schools with closely comparable student populations (demographics and, if appropriate, geographic proximity).


7. School Improvement Rating (if applicable)

The school has not received a rating of declining in two consecutive years of the current contract term.

School rating as determined by the FDOE

Focus Area: State Accountability

Meets the Standard Approaches the Standard Does Not Meet the Standard

X

Findings:

1. The school meets the criteria as the school consistently demonstrates proficiency in ELA and Math. 2. The school meets the criteria as the school has currently received a grade of B and has been a C for

the two prior years, working itself up from a grade of F in the first year of its charter. 3. The school meets the criteria as the students are consistently make adequate learning gains in ELA and

Math. The only time during the life of the school’s current contract that less than 50% of students made adequate learning gains was in 2013-14 in Reading and Math.

4. The school meets the criteria as students in the lowest 25% are making adequate learning gains in ELA and Math. The only time during the life of the school’s current contract that less than 50% of these students made adequate learning gains was in 2013-14 for Reading and 2015-16 in Math.

5. Because the school is appropriately administering applicable state standardized tests to its students, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria in this section.

6. Because the school’s performance, on an average, meets or exceeds the performance of many of its majority feeder pattern schools, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria in this section.

7. N/A

Summative Determination:

Because the school meets 6 of the required criteria and has 1 N/A criteria, it has been determined that the school meets the standard for State Accountability.

Statutory References: 1002.33(7)(a)(3); 1002.33(7)(a)(4); 1002.33(16)(a)(2)

*2015 was a “hold harmless” year

Focus Area Indicator Standard/Criteria Sources of Evidence Include

(but are not limited to)

B. Educational Program Implementation

1. Achievement of mission-specific goals

The school is achieving, or making significant progress towards achieving, the school/mission-specific goals as defined in the school’s contract. • Full complement of

grade levels achieved • Target student

population is being served as identified in the contract

• Innovative programming is being implemented as identified in the application/contract

• Original Application

• Charter Contract • Standardized

Tests • School Developed

Assessments • Special Needs

Student Enrollment Form

• Special Needs Staffing Form

• School Generated Reports

• School Visit Review Report

• Grade Level Verification

• Verification of Innovative Programming

• Master Schedule • School

Improvement Plan

2. Implementation of curriculum and instructional techniques

The school is successfully implementing curriculum and instructional techniques as defined in the school’s contract.

3. Implementation of specialized instruction for students, particularly of those below grade level

The school implements demonstrably effective instructional techniques that support struggling students to successfully achieve grade level proficiency.

4. Data-driven decision-making

The school competently uses qualitative and quantitative data to inform and guide instructional planning and practice aligned with Florida Standards. The school has a sufficient assessment plan and analyzes data from progress monitoring assessments as defined in the school’s contract.

Focus Area Indicator Standard/Criteria Sources of Evidence Include


5. Implementation of Special Education programs

The school provides quality services for exceptional students as defined in the school’s contract and as required by applicable law.

6. Implementation of English Language Learner (ELL) program

The school provides quality services for ELL students as defined in the school’s contract and as required by applicable law.

7. Achievement of goals identified in Corrective Action Plan (CAP), if applicable

The school is achieving or making significant progress towards achieving the goals identified in the CAP.

8. Graduation Rate / % of Students in a college-prep curriculum / Evidence of successful transition to post high school education (if applicable).

The school is achieving, or making significant progress towards increasing the graduation rate.

• CAP Reports • School Generated

Reports

9. Quality of Pedagogy

Variety of instructional methods; student engagement; summative state accountability results

• School Visit Review Report

Focus Area: Educational Program Implementation Meets the Standard Approaches the Standard Does Not Meet the Standard

X

Findings: 1. The school’s mission is to work in partnership with the family and community, with the aim of helping

each child reach full potential in all areas of life. Because the school is achieving and making significant progress toward achieving the school/mission specific goals, as evidenced by accountability data and site visits, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria. During site visits the school proved to have a blended methodology that includes the Montessori approach with other compatible models such as research or project-based education.

2. Because the school is successfully implementing curriculum and instructional techniques defined in the contract and evidenced by accountability data and site visits, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria.

3. Because the school implements demonstrably effective instructional techniques as evidenced by accountability data and site visits, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria. The school has adequate individualized learning and support for struggling students including after-school tutoring for students in need of intervention.

4. Because the school uses data to inform and guide the instructional process, as evidenced by accountability data and site visits, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria.

5. The school approaches this standard. There have been numerous discussions with school administration and with the ESE teacher(s) regarding its implementation of special educational services at the school. Generally, the school does try to ensure the academic success of students with disabilities whose education needs can be met in a regular classroom environment with at least 80% of instruction occurring in a class with non-disabled peers. However, there has been some concerns with the school’s collection of data related to the Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) and how the school provides a continuum of services for students with disabilities within their 80/20 LRE model. From consultation to support facilitation to direct instruction, etc. The location of services corresponds to the 80/20 LRE, not the type of service.

6. The school meets this standard as the performance of its ELL students is comparable to the major feeder pattern schools.

7. N/A 8. N/A 9. As evidenced by accountability data and site visits, the school implements a variety of instructional

methods and it has been determined that the Quality of Pedagogy meets the criteria.

Summative Determination Because the school meets 6 of the criteria, partially meets 1 of the criteria and has 2 N/A criteria, it has been determined that the school meets the standard in the area of Educational Program Implementation.

Statutory References: 1002.33(7)(a)(1); 1002.33(7)(a)(2); 1002.33(7)(a)(4); 1002.33(16)(a)(3)

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Focus Area Indicator Standard Sources of Evidence Include


A. Financial Management

1. Demonstration of professional competence and sound systems in managing the schools financial operations

The school implements an effective system of internal controls over revenues, expenses, and fixed assets, and exercises good business practices.

The school has clear budgetary objectives and budget preparation procedures.

The governing board exercises oversight over and takes accountability for all financial operations of the school.

• Annual Budgets

• Financial Reports

• Annual Financial Audits

• Financial Corrective Action Plan

• Charter Contract

• Governing Board Meeting Minutes

• Financial Procedure Manual

2. Adherence to generally accepted accounting principles

The school adheres to generally accepted accounting principles.

3. Financial Reporting Requirements

The school submits timely and accurate financial information adhering to its financial reporting requirements as defined in the school’s contract.

The school conducts an effective annual audit of financial operations at the school.

The school provides appropriate public transparency of school financial health.

Focus Area: Financial Management


X

Findings:

The school meets the standard for these criteria. Per the audited financial statements for the past 3 years submitted to the district, the school appears to be in good financial standing. The auditors did not report any noncompliance with provisions of contracts or grant agreements or abuse, that have or likely to have occurred, that have a material effect on the financial statements.

Statutory References: 1002.33(7)(a)(9); 1002.33(7)(a)(10); 1002.33(7)(a)(11); 1002.33(9)(g); 1002.33(9)(h)

Focus Area Indicator Standard Sources of Evidence Include (but are not limited to)

B. Financial Viability

1. Budgeting

The school maintains balanced budgets and a positive cash flow.

• Annual Budgets • Financial Reports • Annual Financial Audits • Financial Corrective Action

Plan (if applicable) • Financial Procedure Manual

2. Financial obligations

The school’s financial obligations are in good standing.

3. Long-term financial planning

The school has a sound and sustainable long-term financial plan.

Focus Area: Financial Viability

Meets the Standard Approaches the Standard Does Not Meet the Stand

X

Findings:

The school meets the standard for these criteria as it has maintained a positive cash flow over the life of the contract, is in good standing with its financial obligations and has a sound and sustainable long-term financial plan. The school is managed by Green Apple School Management. Green Apple School Management, LLC filed as a Florida Limited Liability in the State of Florida on Friday, December 14, 2012 and is approximately six years old, as recorded in documents filed with Florida Department of State. Its current manager is Constance Ortiz, the founder of Odyssey Charter Schools. The management company oversees all finances and prepares all financial reports for the school and its governing board.

Statutory References: 1002.33(7)(a)(10); 1002.33(7)(a)(11)

ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE Focus Area Indicator Standard Sources of Evidence Include


A. Student Enrollment and Conduct

1. Student enrollment trends

The school’s actual enrollment is consistent with its enrollment projections and grade configuration identified in the current charter contract.

• Charter Contract

• Student Enrollment / School Generated Reports

• FTE Reports

• Lottery Procedures

• Application Process

• Enrollment Process

• Wait Lists

• Demographics of the school as compared to schools in the same geographic area

2. Composition of the student body

The racial/ethnic composition of the school’s student body is reflective of the community it serves or other public schools in the same school district as the charter school is located.

The student population is aligned with the mission of the school as defined in the charter contract.

The school’s ESE population is similar to that of schools in the same geographic area.

The school’s ELL population is similar to that of schools in the same geographic area.

3. Enrollment/ dismissal procedures

The school implements enrollment/dismissal procedures as defined in the school’s contract and in compliance with applicable law.


4. School environment

The school maintains a safe and secure environment.

• Discipline reporting

• SCAM/SPAR reports

• In/out of school suspensions

5. Health and safety

The school complies with applicable health and safety laws.

• Fire

• Health inspections

• Fire drill reports (FASI)

• Evacuation plans

Focus Area: Student Enrollment and Conduct


X

Findings:

1. The school meets this criterion as the school’s actual enrollment is generally consistent with its enrollment projections.

2. The school partially meets these criteria as the demographic composition of its students is aligned with that of its major feeder pattern schools. However, the school has a significantly lower population of ESE students compared to its majority feeder pattern schools, and a lower population of ELL students compared to its majority feeder pattern school (with the exception of Columbia).

3. The school partially meets the criteria for enrollment and dismissal procedures. The significantly lower population of ESE and ELL students brings to questions how the school is ensuring that students with disabilities or with language barriers will have an equal opportunity of being selected for enrollment in the charter school, as well as, not being dismissed inappropriately from the charter school.

4. The school meets the criteria for maintaining and safe and secure learning environment. 5. The school meets the criteria for health and safety.

Summative Determination

Because the school meets 3 of the five criteria and partially meets 2 of the five criteria, it has been determined that the school approaches the standard for the criteria required in the area of Student Enrollment and Conduct.

Statutory References: 1002.33(7)(a)(7); 1002.33(7)(a)(8); 1002.33(7)(a)(11); 1002.33(9)(e); 1002.33(10); 1002.33(16)(a)(4); 1002.33(16)(a)(5)


B. Governance, Staff and Parents

1. Governance structure

The school implements the governance structure as defined in the school’s contract. This structure enables the school to be an academic, operational, and financial success.

• Governing Board Meeting Agendas

• Governing Board Minutes 2. Compliance

with Sunshine Laws/ Public Records

The school complies with state Sunshine Laws and laws governing public records.

3. Quality and stability of school administration and faculty / High percentage of Highly Qualified Teachers

Stability across years of administration, faculty, and staff.

School leader has demonstrated ability to lead the school in fulfilling its mission as defined in the charter contract.

• Staffing and Staff Turnover Form

• Report from HOUSSE • Out-of-Field Reports • Certification Logs • School Generated Reports

4. Qualifications of instructional staff

The school employs instructional staff that meet state and federal qualifications

• Staffing Reports • School Generated Reports • Data from ACEs

5. Professional Development

Professional development activities for administrators and instructional staff align with the educational program and support continual professional growth.

• Charter contract • School Visit Review Report

6. Parental Involvement

The school is effectively involving parents in its programs as defined in the school’s contract.

Effective policy for addressing parent grievances.

• Parental Surveys • EESAC Membership • Governing Board

Membership • Governing Board By-Laws • Evidence of an active

PTA/PTSO • Evidence of notification of

parents of grievance process

Focus Area: Governance, Staff and Parents


X

Findings:

1. Because the school implements the governing board as indicated in the approved contract, the school meets the criteria.

2. The school submitted all required Governing Board minutes during each year of the charter term, the school meets the criteria.

3. The school has demonstrated consistency of staff; however, the school has had 4 principals over the life of its charter. It has been determined that the school approaches the standard of this criteria.

4. Because the school has consistently hired highly qualified staff, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria.

5. Because the school aligns and offers professional development with the school’s needs, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria.

6. Because the school involves parents in its programs, it has been determined that the school meets the criteria.

Summative Determination

Because the school meets 5 of the criteria and approaches the standard for 1 of the criteria, it has been determined that the meets the standard in the areas of Governance, Staff, and Parents.

Statutory References: 1002.33(7)(a)(14); 1002.33(7)(a)(15); 1002.33(12)(f); 1002.33(12)(g); 1002.33(16)(b)


C. Facilities Facility compliance

The school’s facilities comply with applicable laws and codes.

• Occupancy Permits • Health, Safety and Fire

Reports • Facility Lease • Insurance coverage

Focus Area: Facilities


X

Findings:

1. The school meets the criteria for facilities.

Statutory References: 1002.33(7)(a)(11); 1002.33(7)(a)(13); 1002.33(9)(e); 1002.33(16)(a)(5); 1002.33(18)(a); 1002.33(18)(b)

Evidence State Data

The following is obtained from state data sources available at https://edstats.fldoe.org/SASPortal/main.do

School Grades

Comparing School to its Majority Feeder Pattern Schools

School Grades 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Odyssey Preparatory F C C B Columbia C C C C Jupiter C C C C Port Malabar A C C C Riviera C C B B Turner C C C C Westside A A B B

https://edstats.fldoe.org/SASPortal/main.do

Enrollment Data


Total Enrollment 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Odyssey Preparatory 179 234 266 319 374 Columbia 615 570 577 544 512 Jupiter 796 844 810 793 755 Port Malabar 755 772 761 741 729 Riviera 726 714 689 647 683 Turner 715 758 689 632 609 Westside 803 769 697 702 733

Minority Enrollment


Minority Enrollment Total % Minority

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Odyssey Preparatory 60.3% 62.0% 64.3% 59.9% 54.8% Columbia 46.5% 46.7% 48.4% 50.2% 49.4% Jupiter 58.6% 58.3% 57.9% 55.4% 60.1% Port Malabar 42.0% 39.6% 41.7% 43.7% 44.6% Riviera 59.0% 63.0% 60.4% 62.3% 60.6% Turner 50.9% 52.0% 51.0% 49.7% 47.5% Westside 44.8% 43.7% 47.0% 46.6% 45.8%

Exceptional Student Education


Exceptional Student Education

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

% Disabled Students

% Disabled Students

% Disabled Students

% Disabled Students

% Disabled Students


English Language Learners


English Language Learners

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18


Economic Status


Economic Status 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18


State Assessment Data


Reading 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

% Satisfact or Higher

Reading Gains for Lowest

25%



25%



25%

% Satisfac.

or Higher


25% Odyssey Preparatory

51% 48% 52% Na 50% 55% 64% 63%

Columbia 56% 64% 50% Na 38% 35% 37% 47% Jupiter 55% 66% 43% Na 41% 38% 44% 48% Port Malabar 62% 72% 54% Na 51% 54% 60% 44% Riviera 57% 66% 42% Na 46% 48% 54% 43% Turner 56% 63% 49% Na 41% 38% 43% 38% Westside 66%. 75% 64% Na 58% 48% 57% 62%


Math 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17


Math Gains for Lowest

25%



25%



25%

% Satisfac.

or Higher


25% Odyssey Preparatory

42% 61% 58% Na 55% 30% 59% 63%

Columbia 51% 76% 40% Na 36% 50% 36% 51% Jupiter 54% 73% 46% Na 44% 52% 46% 43% Port Malabar 60% 73% 50% Na 54% 37% 55% 43% Riviera 44% 54% 51% Na 45% 66% 57% 52% Turner 43% 56% 38% Na 43% 48% 41% 32% Westside 62% 67% 65% Na 60% 54% 61% 52%


Writing and Science

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Writing %

Satisfact or Higher

Science %

Satisfact or Higher

Writing %

Satisfact or Higher

Science %

Satisfact or Higher

Writing %

Satisfact or Higher

Science %

Satisfact or Higher

Writing %

Satisfact or Higher

Science %

Satisfact or Higher

Odyssey Preparatory

29% 25% Na 39% Na 45% Na 43%

Columbia 54% 45% Na 41% Na 33% Na 31% Jupiter 42% 42% Na 37% Na 47% Na 40% Port Malabar 81% 70% Na 54% Na 58% Na 53% Riviera 20% 74% Na 50% Na 60% Na 63% Turner 26% 36% Na 40% Na 35% Na 47% Westside 43% 76% Na 71% Na 56% Na 65%

School Financial Status History of Management Company

2013 to Present Green Apple School Management, LLC

Green Apple School Management, LLC filed as a Florida Limited Liability in the State of Florida on Friday, December 14, 2012 and is approximately six years old, as recorded in documents filed with Florida Department of State. Its current manager is Constance Ortiz, the founder of Odyssey Charter Schools.

Financial Analysis

Financial Status Pursuant to Most Current Audited Financial Statement (FY 2017): Submitted to the District on August 30, 2017

Reported Revenue $ 3,082,650 Reported Expenditures* $ 2,860,760 % Administrative Expenditures** $ 1,638632 % Classroom Expenditures*** $ 1,222,128 Total Assets $ 4,422,437 Total Liabilities $ 4,033,466 Fund Balance $ 738,724 Current Ratio 9.78 Debt Ratio 0.912

*Reported Expenditures are defined as: Total current expenditures before capital outlay and debt services **Administrative Expenditures are defined as: All expenditures other than instruction

***Classroom Expenditures are defined as: Expenditures reported under “Instruction” in the audited financial report

School Compliance Status

Charter Contract Compliance Report:

Charter Tools Compliance Status / Score* 2013-14 Compliant / 96 2014-15 Compliant / 97 2015-16 Compliant / 90 2016-17 Compliant / 93 2017-18 In Progress

*The calculation for the benchmark score is as follows: (individual benchmark score) times (individual benchmark priority) divided by (sum of all priorities of the school’s benchmark for the current school year)

Title I Compliance Report:

Reporting Progress / Score 2013-14 Na 2014-15 Na 2015-16 Na 2016-17 91% / 67 2017-18 In Progress

Charter School Renewal Program Revieweagendatoc.brevardschools.org/02-27-2018 School Board Meeting...

Documents

Transcript of Charter School Renewal Program Revieweagendatoc.brevardschools.org/02-27-2018 School Board Meeting...